It seems like a good time to add to both if you like these companies. I have a position in O and I’ve been adding a little more to it over the past year.
First timer here to your channel. I like your analysis. One problem with using dividend yield theory is that when a stock returns to its average it may be due to a dividend cut. I got caught up in that with WBA, VFC, and INTC.
This is why the most important part of investing is making sure you find a great business to invest in. Valuation is a second consideration. My philosophy is based on finding high quality companies and then figuring out if they are reasonably valued. These 10 undervalued aristocrats appear like a deal but if you don’t like to fundamentals of the company this valuation is meaningless. It’s difficult to get your investing decisions right all of the time. You have to factor in that a handful of your investments will go on to fail. But if you also pick a few great “winners” along the way they’ll more than make up for those losses.
It’s highly likely that some of these are value traps. I did mention that just because these stocks look cheap doesn’t mean they are good investments. You need to figure out if the company is fundamentally strong and has good future prospects. I believe everyone should make that decision for themselves rather than me telling you what I think.
I bought some Medtronic this week and also added to my position in O. Thank you for your video.
It seems like a good time to add to both if you like these companies. I have a position in O and I’ve been adding a little more to it over the past year.
First timer here to your channel. I like your analysis. One problem with using dividend yield theory is that when a stock returns to its average it may be due to a dividend cut. I got caught up in that with WBA, VFC, and INTC.
This is why the most important part of investing is making sure you find a great business to invest in. Valuation is a second consideration.
My philosophy is based on finding high quality companies and then figuring out if they are reasonably valued.
These 10 undervalued aristocrats appear like a deal but if you don’t like to fundamentals of the company this valuation is meaningless.
It’s difficult to get your investing decisions right all of the time. You have to factor in that a handful of your investments will go on to fail. But if you also pick a few great “winners” along the way they’ll more than make up for those losses.
It would be nice at the end to have a comparison chart or table among those talked about. Thanks, it was a good presentation
Good suggestion!
Thanks
Hey is it possible to get that chart?
You mean the spreadsheet?
@@LongacresFinance yes that’s what I meant
@@joshuamcclam994 I uploaded it to my Patreon a few days ago.
You can join with a free trial and download it from there.
Why u didn't take consideration of value trap?
It’s highly likely that some of these are value traps. I did mention that just because these stocks look cheap doesn’t mean they are good investments. You need to figure out if the company is fundamentally strong and has good future prospects.
I believe everyone should make that decision for themselves rather than me telling you what I think.
Sjm seems interesting
There are about 30 something aristocrats that looked undervalued in this model. Perhaps I can create a follow up video about the rest.
Ur excel to big to see tickers and ur video not for nubes...
I know it was too small to see but otherwise it all wouldn’t fit on the screen.
That’s why I went over the 10 most undervalued in more detail.
👍