[건사오소리비교] KEF LS50 vs ProAc tablette Ref.8

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ส.ค. 2022

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @marcinlis645
    @marcinlis645 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Even accross PC i heard at ProAC is more 3D sound and Kef little bit flat. ProAc culd be better for long sessions but Kef for woogie boogie with dancing music.

    • @gunsao
      @gunsao  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. I agree. Kef like to flat & monitering speaker. Proac sound is more tensen to listen music

  • @user-kv4ly4et7v
    @user-kv4ly4et7v ปีที่แล้ว +2

    프로악이 첨 듣기에는 호감가는 소리지만 오히려 케프가 담백해서 실제소리에 가깝고 그래서 오래 듣기 좋지 않을가요.

    • @gunsao
      @gunsao  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      예. 케프의 장점을 잘 말씀해주셨네요. 스피커별 매력을 잘 이해하고 본인의 성향에 맞게 매칭해서 사용하시는데 도움이 도었으면 합니다^^

  • @surprisecode
    @surprisecode ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ls50은 저음없다고 서브우퍼를 추천하더군요 좀 어의없죠

    • @gunsao
      @gunsao  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      저음이 없진 않죠?!^^
      아마 만족스러운 저역이 아니여서지 않을까합니다?!

  • @user-bu9cr8gl7k
    @user-bu9cr8gl7k ปีที่แล้ว +2

    케프가 해상도가 높아보이네요

    • @gunsao
      @gunsao  ปีที่แล้ว

      예. 해상도 또는 선명함이 뚜렷한 모니터스피커 성향이 있는거 같습니다. 특히 보컬의 이탈감이 해상도가 좋다는 느낌을 많이 주는 편입니다^^

  • @voiceofjyp
    @voiceofjyp ปีที่แล้ว +1

    프로악 소리가 멋지군요, 케프는 심심해서 싫증날듯

  • @Nobodyxp
    @Nobodyxp ปีที่แล้ว

    Proac for sure, KEF is the way to be flat and digitalised

    • @gunsao
      @gunsao  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sounds good. But kef meta doesn't digitalised. meta is Better than ls50.

  • @changbokyoon9851
    @changbokyoon9851 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    프로악에 더 호감 !