Nuclear Plant - 10 Earthquakes COMPARISON
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ย. 2024
- I hope these simulations will bring more earthquake awareness around the world and educate the general public about potential earthquake related hazards. All these simulations take into consideration only the shaking caused in close proximity to the earthquake's epicenter. Also, a friendly reminder that for this video's purpose, I have shortened the actual duration of the simulation. Any earthquake over M 7.5 could last for more than a minute. The great Tohoku quake that hit Japan in March 2011 had a magnitude of 9 and lasted for about 5 minutes.
--------------------------------------------------
Live California Seismograph: @CaSeismograph
-----------------------------------
These earthquake simulations were created in Blender 3D with the Bullet Constraints Builder (BCB - a structural simulation code made by Kai Kostack) which extends Blender´s basic physics functionality with a sophisticated toolset to simulate load dynamics in building structures.
Music provided by Epidemic Sound: share.epidemic...
For any questions and collaborations, you can reach out to me at earthquakesim@gmail.com
----------------
Simulación de terremoto | simulazione di terremoti | भूकम्प सिमुलेशन | 地震シミュレーション | jarðskjálftauppgerð | Erdbebensimulation | 地震模拟 | भूकंप सिमुलेशन | deprem simülasyonu | simulare de cutremur | tremblement de terre
#earthquake #awareness #animation
The good news is that modern nuclear reactors are designed to immediately go into emergency shutdown (called a "SCRAM") if an abnormality in their operation is detected and will do so automatically. Assuming the reactor containment vessel remained intact and that there are plenty of backup systems that remain operational, the chances of a large-scale radiological incident resulting from a scenario like this should be minimal.
@Orca19904 I am interested in nuclear reactors and I know that the reactor building is specially reinforced and surrounded by a second building and (at least in PWR reactors) the core is also protected by a reactor pressure vessel (RPV) and if for some reason the core cannot be cooled down and it melts, then the RPV and the double reactor building will protect against the leakage of radioactive substances into the environment, besides, when building a nuclear power plant, you need to do a safety analysis that takes into account things like earthquakes and other natural disasters.
As long as they're not Russian plants built during the cold war, a scram should be fine. But if the control rods are graphite tipped, it could be catastrophic, see Chernobyl
@@thomasvlaskampiii6850 RBMK's also lack a fully enclosed containment vessel, allowing escape of fission products in a major incident.
@@Orca19904 Pretty much everything about an RBMK screams "who thought this was a good idea?"
the 10 to 12 scram would not work to much damaged happens to fast and the power plant would get a lot of attention to try and stop meltdown lets just hope it don't use graphite if that is the case there would be a 2nd chernobyl with fire everywhere but that is if it is all out meltdown because the containment building would not fall apart like that to let you know how strong those are THEY CAN TAKE A JET AND BE FINE
its so interesting how the main buildings never collapsed, even when everything around them was reduced to rubble. they mustve been extremely well built.
Steel structures🙂
It's probably because the cores have tons of lead, concrete and rebar in order to stop radiation, but in doing so, it also makes it far more stable
@@JonasColorado It’s also made to not get destroyed in earthquake
Earthquake Slim is the beasties Channel on World the Real 3D Grafics and animation 4K 8K 9K Videocording 😮
@@MariosBillTsirkas499 :)
Remember that Fukushima Daiichi took a magnitude 8 earthquake AND a tsunami on the same day.
Can we just appreciate the fact that the buildings are very nice
I’m happy you like them!!
Well, sadly their gone now, only rubble
your boreing!
Over 24 hour of work for an 8-9 minute video. That takes a persistent, determined person.
Well but the whole creation process took one week 🙂 rendering the physics, editing, adding lights and shadows
I experienced the March 11, 2011 M9.0 earthquake at my workplace in Ibaraki, south of Fukushima. The seismic intensity around here is equivalent to IX in MMI (JMA seismic intensity 6+), but when the building was constructed from 1967 to 1971, it was not expected that an earthquake of M9.0 and huge tsunami would occur. It caused an accident.
it went from barely anything to pure destruction, this shows how powerful earthquakes really are.
I'm glad you like my new video formats! From now on I will always keep it like this 😄
Richer 1-4.6 power plant : no thanks bro
Of all of your videos ive watched, the destruction physics have only gotten better and more realistic. I would like to see a skyscraper that is designed to withstand earthquakes for a new sim. Keep up the great work!
Fukushima event be like
Yep but it also got hit by a tsunami
@@EarthquakeSimone of the power plant exploded
Hey that's what I said in da livestream
To make more like Fukushima
1-4.6 power plant: no
If this video taught me anything, it's that the safest place is in the cab of a diesel train. That sucker barely budged off it's tracks.
Your videos are so interesting. I feel compelled to watch them. Keep up the good work😊
Thank you for watching my simulations 🙂
Wow, EqS, you are at 20K subscribers, on this channel, and every video becomes more impressive. I have wondered, are most of the world's earthquakes in the daytime, or do you know the percentage? Thank you for trying to keep in touch, but I know, from the number of subscribers, on both of your channels, that it is an almost impossible task. Thank you, for being a good, dear friend who manages to entertain and instruct thousands of us.
So happy to hear from you!! You are right, I think TH-cam comments are the fastest I reply to. 😄 there is an equal amount of earthquakes striking during the day or night in any particular year. Good question!!
Whenever plates shift I makes an earthquake at the fault but it depends on the speed the plates collides because then the ground shifts up and down creating movement because of the scraping on the plates so it can happen at any time because the plates are always moving
Its so satisfying to see it crumble
RBMK reactor corpuses with huge steel ventilation stacks: i think i can feel the ground shake...
“EQS Nuclear” lol
It stands for Earthquake Nuclear
@@KaycinEditsbreh thats not what it means it stands for earth quake sim = eqs
Now I can see who truly knows my channel😄😄❤️❤️❤️
Yeppp!!!
EQS is a big company lol. Bookstores, Airports, nuclear powerplant, grocery, you name it. But it s also signature of this channel. Up to 1 million views and also so much subscribers
Your videos are getting better by the minute!
We just experienced a strong earthquake. Please take immediate action and follow the emergency protocol. Stay calm and move to a safe location. Check on your colleagues and ensure their safety. Listen to the instructions of the authorities and be ready for aftershocks. Stay away from damaged buildings and power lines. We will update you as soon as possible. Stay safe!
All fun and games when u realized the phone is shaking
the powerline is strong.
Wait so can you make a stadium with a concert? That will be cool
Yes I could!
So what's the earthquake epicenter of depth? If possible happens near ground then our scientist can predict disaster and shut down the plant.
I like to see Dam next !!!
Can you simulate an earthquake on the beach? 🙏
That would be very interesting!
Those r strong buildings!
the good news is the building is staying upright
Steel buildings are particularly strong
Can you show us the reactor room and other critical elements for these magnitudes? I feel like the outside part of the building suffering damage doesn't really show you where or at what point the critical reactor elements start taking damage. That seems like something that might be important in terms of hazards. I can imagine that if the quake created a flaw within the coolant loops it might cause severe damage to the reactor even before the first window breaks in the main building.
I'm quite skeptical when it comes to the realism of this video. Nuclear power plants are designed to withstand even the strongest earthquakes possible. Just think of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, in Japan. If i'm not wrong it was a 9.1 on the Richter scale and the Fukushima daichii and dainii npps were not damaged at all.
@@sciekimike280 this video simulates the plant being close to the epicenter Fukishima was a considerable distance away so it was felt but it didn't do much damage to the plant itself.
Could you make one in a neighborhood?
What is the depth of earthquake in this simulations? Because this type of destructions is not normal for that insensities.
Very shallow depth, 5 miles.
Nice job for making the nuclear power plant strong 😊
Containment domes are stronger than cooling towers so I'm not sure why this simulation crushed the containment domes first
What was funny was that none of the cars moved an inch.
True probably on parking mode
Can’t wait to see more angles and higher magnitudes of this!
Imagine what chairs would look like if our legs were bent backwards
I really like this kind of videos, since they can show how dangerous earthquakes can be.
I wanted to see every video when i have seen the first video of this kind:the supermarket one.
Thank you so much!!
We had a 7.8 Richter scale earthquake here in Alaska. Everything is so well built all that happened were a few collapses. A lot of roads opened up and swallowed cars though. I was in school auditorium eating my breakfeast and the floor started swaying and like the ocean
Can you make a city earthquake? (Too much skyscrapers)
I can definitely try that!!!
@@EarthquakeSim Thanks and I obviously love your context!
Idea for new simulation. A harbour with big ships and oil rafinery
What app do you use?
As an Alaskan I can say I’ve felt every kind of earthquake on this list and it hurts, no really, I still have head aches from the one in 2018.
The reactor containment building wouldn't crumble that quickly, it's designed to take an impact from a fully fuelled Boeing 747 at mach 1 and stay in one piece, no way an earthquake is going to breach it
do one in an abandoned factory or a really really really tall construction site! love ur vids
Выглядит завораживающе и ужасающе!
Согласен
Wow you got 20k nice
Yes!! Thank you for being here❤️
@@EarthquakeSim your welcome
What software are you using to create these simulations? Also I love seeing these complex structures get destroyed.
I am using Blender 3D with bullet constraints builder extension 🙂
Thanks!
I am still transposing the videos, for further analysis and researching construction materials along with specs 😊I hope to have better comments as I go along Thanks, your work has opened doors for me 😅😅
Thank you so much for your feedback! I'm glad you are finding my videos helpful!!
I highly doubt that a 7.1 would cause the reactor's containment vessel to collapse. Especially if the cooling towers remain standing. Maybe there wasn't a concrete material option in this simulator.
Yes, this strikes me as extremely unlikely. The containment buildings use truly obscene amounts of rebar and (per the World Nuclear Association) in Japan in 1995 they withstood accelerations equal to approximately 1G, firmly in IX+ intensity territory based on the estimations from USGS shake maps. The cooling towers, on the other hand, tend to be lighter, more delicate structures with primary members being straight lines along the surface of the hyperboloid; thus, the way one would fail is very different than shown here.
The good news is that there are no earthquakes in Zaporizhia 😊
The bad news….
Thank you so much for being part of this wonderful community!! 😊 we can all contribute to spreading more earthquake awareness around the world
I like how tree dancing
Building at XII Intensity: *Dies*
Train: Skill Issue!
at least modern reactor cores would still not meltdown
Fukushima 2011:
Yep.. Except it was hit by a tsunami also
I’d be intrigued to know how the actual reactor building stood up, the reactor containment walls are built to survive just about anything.
Good Video, Earthquake Fetish Boy!!!
This is such an awesome recreation! Keep it up!
Eqs kinda sound like mercedes model
Me encanta tu canal
Graciiaaass❤️❤️
finnaly youtube reccomends me smth good
so happy that you found my channel interesting! :)
should you make a suspension bridge next
But I've done 3 so far😁I want to focus on structures that I haven't tried before
@@EarthquakeSim maybe a mall or a huge restaurant
The last earthquake
One of the tower or whatever you call that made a little roof for the cars 8:20
Trees are more stronger than mankind made even in tsunami sometimes
very nice to see the earthquakes being simulated on this one 🙂
That one locomotive surviving every single intensity:
better evacuate the city after that earthquake, cuz that reactor gonna meltdown
I'm sorry I couldn't make it i lost power and still without power💀
Bravo, felicitări sa o ti tot așa!
Mulțumesc mult! Din ce zona ești?
@@EarthquakeSim Din Sibiu
Știam ca ești roman, te urmăresc de ceva timp
@@ThEhArD61 super fain! Mă bucur că ești aici😄cum ai descoperit canalul meu?
@@EarthquakeSim pai a fost cutremurul ala din Gorj și îmi apăreau clipurile tale la recandate😂
Mi se par foarte interesante
The Train 🗿 but respect this looks amazing + Abo 👍🏻
Thanks for watching!!!
Very cool!!!
Do u remember me from the Livestream when you were building
No explosion?
I know we were all waiting for a nuclear explosion.
Duration is pretty significant too as well as intensity
Wow!, Seeings it go from kust a shake to the whole thing being destroyed...
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
All building as well as power line are destroy but… train is still standing and on track, not fall over
Next up astroid impact one mile from nuclear power plant XD do it pls
Can you keep the earthquake durations longer?
Yes but that would take a lot of extra time to simulate...😊
@EarthquakeSim just buy a super computer lol
We wouldn't need a range of intensities. Just pick an intensity that is doing damage and we see how long till all fall down.
the cars are made out of literally titanium
TBH, I feel like at 6.0, no parts of the building(s) should be falling apart. Especially by todays standards and especially a structure as critical as a nuclear power plant. 7.5, maybe some superficial damage. 8.0 and higher is understandable.
can you please do a simulation video of EQ in Lake Havasu Cty. we can see "London bridge"- coming down🤔😄
I: no pain!
III: mild
V: moderate
VIII: severe
X: very severe
XIII: AHHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHHHHHH!!!!
This is my first earthquake comment:Map:Burj khalifa i to xiii quakes.
At intensity 12, the reactors would have a total meltdow
Fukushima in wich Mercalli intensity do you calificate?.
Fukushima experienced VIII on Mercalli scale. Sendai airport IX
This video hits a bit different with a particular event in Japan from 12 years ago.
Surely the destruction would be more devastating if the earthquake type was different ? This model is for a slip fault by the way the buildings are shaking. If it was a thrust type then the buildings would fall at a lower intensity. There’s also a subduction type where one plate slides under another
Wouldn't the containment dome hold together a bit better than that? It's strong enough to hold something like 4 bar of pressure.. Very strong!
I know the us nuclear commission has a probability scale for the risk of a earthquake seriously damaging a reactor (ex: Browns Ferry with 1:100,000)
During the Super Outbreak of 2011 the Brown's Ferry Nuclear power plant had an extremely close call with a tornado which passed just barely to the south of the plant; sparing the plant, but it had to go into S.C.R.A.M mode.
Those main buildings are built to last!
Same with those electrical towers: The three closes to the reactors withstood even the strongest quake!
Simulate a tsunami
That locomotive never fell!
By the time you hit a 5.0 on the richter scale, the entire plant will go into shutdown and a LOOP(loss of offsite power).
Hiii
Welcome here😊👍
how about you do an alarm instead of music in the background to make it more scary and realistic
No, don’t! Use Chernobyl to do it!
Building in Chilean 2010 earthquake didn't collapse but here chimneys goes first must have been too weak 😂
Do a magnitude 20 earthquake
What! No nuclear holocaust explosion?
Luckily nuclear power plants are built very well to resist to extreme events such as bombing or earthquakes.
Fun fact: Only the train survived without taking any damages
What is that song
Hello
How are you😊
Good