If you ask me TH-cam really needs to step up and do something about this because with this, it defeats the purpose of even having an online platform when making videos I'm having a community some communication would help
Hey Ralph I think if you try to just post images and it like a slideshow PowerPoint format it won't be as severe because I do have some Dragon Ball videos on my channel if you look
Damn, 3 hours to reclaim a vid. So, basically, it will take over 18 days to obtain the vids? Damn, “big winner” to Susan of TH-cam who nominated herself the “freedom of speech” award. 🤦♂️ No wonder we hate her guts and Google’s, but anyway, NGL, other than just Toei, I hope Japanese companies just chill out and understand that IP appraisal is not “theft”.
I really like Mark's videos but, tbh, I'm not as convinced as most people are that _all_ his videos, without _any_ doubt, fall under fair use. Will be interesting to see how this unfolds, but I think there's a chance some videos will not return. Some of his videos (GT Black Star Dragon Ball review, DB Tien Saga review, DB Super Broly review) have been gone since August and still haven't returned. From what I understood, if the copyright claims are not legit, the videos will return after two months and some few days. The fact that four months later they still haven't returned makes me think Mark may have lost his appeal and that they were thus legitimate takedowns. This would mean that Mark did in fact commit copyright infringement or was at least unable to show he did not. Some people say that when a video is transformative or a review then you're good to go. I just looked up Google's page on fair use and it doesn't say it _exactly_ like that though. It says that being transformative and being a review increases the chances of your video being legit, but doesn't guarantee it. It also says that if you monetize your video your chances decrease. And you're less likely to get a legit copyright claim if you use non-fictitious work, rather than fictitious work (which Mark uses). I also noticed it says you can get a copyright claim for using just few seconds of copyrighted material. I guess in practice this is basically a big caveat to the "transformative" rule. The fair use page gives an example of a little portion of a song being used in a video that can lead to a copyright claim. Mark did just that with his GT review, sharing a portion of the opening song (music + video) for no reason other than to say he likes it (which I doubt counts as a "review" on the song). The GT video still isn't back after four months. Perhaps he did commit copyright infringement here? Anyway... just my thoughts. I do hope he gets them back, but with so many videos taken down I think there's a chance not all will come back.
Great point man. In general, the whole fair use thing is kinda in a grey area. It not super clear and of course is up to the original owner. Let’s just hope he gets more videos back.
@@DragonBallCode well photos are still technically their property. So they weren't exactly wrong there either. I also saw another video where he drew things also licensed by Toei and those videos got taken down too. I'm not defending them in anyway whatsoever but come on! These content "creators" are using their property. What did they expect?
Dragonball super was crap and he criticized it , this is why they are trying to make his job harder .
Budokai Goku; STOP IT!!! I won't ALLOW YOU to get away with this anymore!!!
Mark were here to support you don’t let toei bully you and toei should not have to take your videos but who now know?
If you ask me TH-cam really needs to step up and do something about this because with this, it defeats the purpose of even having an online platform when making videos I'm having a community some communication would help
Agreed
Remember when Saiyan Scholar lost like 300 of his videos due to strikes
I didn’t know about that one but wow, that’s insane!!
Glad to see you address this man 😊
Yeah. I fell like it is something that needs to be talked about.
@@DragonBallCode yep! Seeing Mark cry made me feel so bad and I almost cried myself
Strong composing for this one!
Thank you!
Hey Ralph I think if you try to just post images and it like a slideshow PowerPoint format it won't be as severe because I do have some Dragon Ball videos on my channel if you look
According to Mark it still happens 😩
They did this with saiyan scholar to and a lot more creators if toei goes this way Dragon ball won’t be on TH-cam
Completely true
Toei and Bandai been tripping lately!!!!😤😤😤
Yeah. A little too much
THIS SOUNDS SO UNREAL THAT IT"S PURE COMEDY 150 ?
It’s crazy!
Damn, 3 hours to reclaim a vid. So, basically, it will take over 18 days to obtain the vids? Damn, “big winner” to Susan of TH-cam who nominated herself the “freedom of speech” award. 🤦♂️ No wonder we hate her guts and Google’s, but anyway, NGL, other than just Toei, I hope Japanese companies just chill out and understand that IP appraisal is not “theft”.
Yes. They have to relax. It took him 3 for all of the video.
I really like Mark's videos but, tbh, I'm not as convinced as most people are that _all_ his videos, without _any_ doubt, fall under fair use. Will be interesting to see how this unfolds, but I think there's a chance some videos will not return. Some of his videos (GT Black Star Dragon Ball review, DB Tien Saga review, DB Super Broly review) have been gone since August and still haven't returned. From what I understood, if the copyright claims are not legit, the videos will return after two months and some few days. The fact that four months later they still haven't returned makes me think Mark may have lost his appeal and that they were thus legitimate takedowns. This would mean that Mark did in fact commit copyright infringement or was at least unable to show he did not.
Some people say that when a video is transformative or a review then you're good to go. I just looked up Google's page on fair use and it doesn't say it _exactly_ like that though. It says that being transformative and being a review increases the chances of your video being legit, but doesn't guarantee it. It also says that if you monetize your video your chances decrease. And you're less likely to get a legit copyright claim if you use non-fictitious work, rather than fictitious work (which Mark uses).
I also noticed it says you can get a copyright claim for using just few seconds of copyrighted material. I guess in practice this is basically a big caveat to the "transformative" rule. The fair use page gives an example of a little portion of a song being used in a video that can lead to a copyright claim. Mark did just that with his GT review, sharing a portion of the opening song (music + video) for no reason other than to say he likes it (which I doubt counts as a "review" on the song). The GT video still isn't back after four months. Perhaps he did commit copyright infringement here?
Anyway... just my thoughts. I do hope he gets them back, but with so many videos taken down I think there's a chance not all will come back.
Great point man. In general, the whole fair use thing is kinda in a grey area. It not super clear and of course is up to the original owner. Let’s just hope he gets more videos back.
He also used anime clips. Fair use or not everyone knows that toei target these. It's genuinely his fault
He also mentioned that videos with photos only also got taken down.
@@DragonBallCode well photos are still technically their property. So they weren't exactly wrong there either. I also saw another video where he drew things also licensed by Toei and those videos got taken down too. I'm not defending them in anyway whatsoever but come on! These content "creators" are using their property. What did they expect?
Short answer: No.
But you should still check out the video anyway.
Just as short answer; yes
I'm happy that I was wrong about this. @@johnathan7313