Thank you for this, very interesting! The Sony does have a pleasing look baked into it and at first glance was my preference but upon closer examination it seems that the warm cast kind of slightly pushes all colors in one direction and results in less color separation compared to the Fuji. Also looking at the shadow areas like top right of your forehead and shadow side cheek it looks like the Fuji has more refined contrast. Would love to see the comparison with the new F-Log2 C on the Fuji which massively improved its colors!
Thank you for your in depth thoughts. I can tell you really inspected the footage thoroughly. I haven't tried the F log 2c yet, curious what that will do. Maybe I can do a comparison on that when I find the time, good idea! Thanks again for taking the time to comment.
i assume youre using the same lens model for both? i know different lenses can affect color. currently trying to decide on a camera and im leaning towards the fuji. even in this video i prefer the fuji, though seems from the comments im the only one... lol
Not the same lens but both Sigma's. Sigma 18-35 on the Sony FX30 and Sigma 18-50 on the Fuji. Difference could be there, but I wasn't expecting this much of a difference. I have to say I am currently liking the FX30 better, I don't know why. If you're still trying to decide: Fuji just released a firmware update though improving the AF. I just dropped a video about it. Certainly more reliable so that in combination with your preference of the Fuji look could be a factor in your decision. Thank you for commenting!
This video almost made me sure I wanted the Sony fx30 but I just realized you’re using the a high contrast Fuji sim which makes the skin look too sharp and washed out 😭😭😭 idk anymore which colors I like better
I go back and forth all the time wondering which one I like better. I actually maybe like the Sony better to be completely honest. I just like how it looks and how it renders colors. Fuji feels more hit or miss sometimes for me, in terms of performance and look. White balancing properly when shooting also feels more like a challenge with the Fuji. Thank you for commenting!
In the first part Fujifilm clearly has the more natural skin tone. Although you did use a film simulation which already has a bit of a look to it. Maybe next time use a more neutral one. With the LUTs applied, all bets are off anyway...
I wanted to compare the punchy, contrasty PP off look from the Sony to one of the more punchy looks that Fuji offers apart from Classic Chrome for example. I was still amazed by the noticeable difference between the two. I follow your opinion in terms of skin tones, but for corporate videos for example I actually like the way the Sony looks a lot. In terms of the LUTs, you often see LUTs offered to be "compatible with any camera". But as you stated and as you can clearly see results are so different. Thanks for taking the time to comment!
I’m torn. I already have the whole Fuji setup, been a photographer for 12 ish years. Zero video experience, delving into it this year. Thinking about just buying an A7SIII (or FX3/30) and a single prime to be the dedicated video camera. Also can’t help but think an XH2S would work with my current prime collection just fine. Torn torn. Colors look better on the Sony here for sure, which leans me harder that way since Sony has better AF and typically Fuji is known for colors. Any insights would be dope!
It sure is a hard decision to make, but I too was already invested in the fuji system, that's why I went with the X-H2s. But I needed something that was an absolute work horse and made my life as easy as possible when doing jobs due to my marketing job which involves corporate shoots with quick turn around times. That's why I ended up getting the FX30 as well. I have to say it's super reliable and really feels like a work tool that gets jobs done. Colors in my opinion also look better as of lately comparing the two. But the X-H2s will serve you great as well. The new AF update (I made a video on that as well) really steps it up in terms of reliability. The Fuji certainly is the better all round camera, with superb hybrid qualities. Also the video quality is supposed to be super impressive. I have seen the potential at times, but I have experienced some issues in the past as well. And trust me, it never stays "that one prime" lens. So if you already own multiple fuji lenses, I would go with the Fuji. Although I have mostly used one lens on my FX30 for almost one and a half year now (Tamron 17-70mm). Apologies for my late response and thank you for your question! Keep me posted on your decision ;).
@@AntonJDCreatives Super thorough response greatly appreciated. I no longer rely in my camera for income so super dope family home videos and the occasional client is enough for me :) I have a dozen Fuji primes already so I’ll likely just stick with an X-H2S. I appreciate you taking the time! For now been filming handheld on the X-T3, figure there’s people out there ten billions times more talented using lesser gear than I already own do skill>gear, but looking forward to the upgrade as well to help. The main reason I never went full dive into video was the amount of time I already spent in post as a photographer. I knew adding sound design and hours of footage would only add to the post side. Any tips for someone who wants the highest quality video to look back on for the least amount of, or better said, most efficient use of, post time would be welcome. I like to try to master anything for fun so I’ll be going all in on video finally :)
It's important to set the whitebalance right you can take out the greenshift with the camera whitebalance settings. Sony hast always this strange yellowish tint for me extreme difficult to remove without affecting the whole footage. Do Do somebody has a solution for that?
Haven't really noticed what you are referring to, but I understand your frustration. White balancing is always a challenge and I have had trouble in post fixing it many times. Thanks for your comment!
FX30 footage looks sharper, but it could be due to the lens choice as someone already mentioned. I do not like the sharpness as it makes it look less filmic but you can also take that sharpness away if you are skilled enough in davinci. The sony is also a little bit greener but that is what sony is famous for :)
That's exactly how I feel about this test. I think the Fuji has a green shift instead of the Sony, as opposed to what you always read online. Overall the FX30 just looks more pleasing to me here.
Already someone who picked up on the little hidden AF test with me sitting down 😁 To be honest, in talking heads like this I don't think you can notice a significant difference. In run and gun work, the FX30 also struggles from time to time, it's no magic machine. But the X-H2s is indeed less reliable. As far as settings go, I don't fiddle with them too much. AF tracking is at +4 and speed at -3. Area mode and eye AF is almost always on. Thanks for your question!
the fx30 is probably the best camera for the price to performance ratio, but the they both have their advantages and disadvantages. They are both winners to me in their onw right.
@@AntonJDCreatives Im usually not a fan of super sharpened images, but I think the Sony handles it really beautifully! Like it's not so jarring like other sharp cameras. It's sharp in a flattering way, idk
So once and for all, which one do you REALLY prefer, brand bias aside?
i was such a fuji girl, but this convinced me to reconsider my whole life and look at the FX30 lmao
Thank you for this, very interesting! The Sony does have a pleasing look baked into it and at first glance was my preference but upon closer examination it seems that the warm cast kind of slightly pushes all colors in one direction and results in less color separation compared to the Fuji. Also looking at the shadow areas like top right of your forehead and shadow side cheek it looks like the Fuji has more refined contrast. Would love to see the comparison with the new F-Log2 C on the Fuji which massively improved its colors!
Thank you for your in depth thoughts. I can tell you really inspected the footage thoroughly. I haven't tried the F log 2c yet, curious what that will do. Maybe I can do a comparison on that when I find the time, good idea! Thanks again for taking the time to comment.
i assume youre using the same lens model for both? i know different lenses can affect color. currently trying to decide on a camera and im leaning towards the fuji. even in this video i prefer the fuji, though seems from the comments im the only one... lol
Not the same lens but both Sigma's. Sigma 18-35 on the Sony FX30 and Sigma 18-50 on the Fuji.
Difference could be there, but I wasn't expecting this much of a difference. I have to say I am currently liking the FX30 better, I don't know why. If you're still trying to decide: Fuji just released a firmware update though improving the AF. I just dropped a video about it. Certainly more reliable so that in combination with your preference of the Fuji look could be a factor in your decision. Thank you for commenting!
This video almost made me sure I wanted the Sony fx30 but I just realized you’re using the a high contrast Fuji sim which makes the skin look too sharp and washed out 😭😭😭 idk anymore which colors I like better
I go back and forth all the time wondering which one I like better. I actually maybe like the Sony better to be completely honest. I just like how it looks and how it renders colors. Fuji feels more hit or miss sometimes for me, in terms of performance and look. White balancing properly when shooting also feels more like a challenge with the Fuji. Thank you for commenting!
In the first part Fujifilm clearly has the more natural skin tone. Although you did use a film simulation which already has a bit of a look to it. Maybe next time use a more neutral one. With the LUTs applied, all bets are off anyway...
SÍ, FUJI tiene mejor color en la primera parte
I wanted to compare the punchy, contrasty PP off look from the Sony to one of the more punchy looks that Fuji offers apart from Classic Chrome for example. I was still amazed by the noticeable difference between the two. I follow your opinion in terms of skin tones, but for corporate videos for example I actually like the way the Sony looks a lot. In terms of the LUTs, you often see LUTs offered to be "compatible with any camera". But as you stated and as you can clearly see results are so different. Thanks for taking the time to comment!
@@AntonJDCreatives Have you tried the new Reala Ace on Fuji? That looks pretty punchy but still natural.
I’m torn. I already have the whole Fuji setup, been a photographer for 12 ish years. Zero video experience, delving into it this year. Thinking about just buying an A7SIII (or FX3/30) and a single prime to be the dedicated video camera. Also can’t help but think an XH2S would work with my current prime collection just fine. Torn torn. Colors look better on the Sony here for sure, which leans me harder that way since Sony has better AF and typically Fuji is known for colors. Any insights would be dope!
It sure is a hard decision to make, but I too was already invested in the fuji system, that's why I went with the X-H2s. But I needed something that was an absolute work horse and made my life as easy as possible when doing jobs due to my marketing job which involves corporate shoots with quick turn around times. That's why I ended up getting the FX30 as well. I have to say it's super reliable and really feels like a work tool that gets jobs done. Colors in my opinion also look better as of lately comparing the two. But the X-H2s will serve you great as well. The new AF update (I made a video on that as well) really steps it up in terms of reliability. The Fuji certainly is the better all round camera, with superb hybrid qualities. Also the video quality is supposed to be super impressive. I have seen the potential at times, but I have experienced some issues in the past as well. And trust me, it never stays "that one prime" lens. So if you already own multiple fuji lenses, I would go with the Fuji. Although I have mostly used one lens on my FX30 for almost one and a half year now (Tamron 17-70mm). Apologies for my late response and thank you for your question! Keep me posted on your decision ;).
@@AntonJDCreatives Super thorough response greatly appreciated. I no longer rely in my camera for income so super dope family home videos and the occasional client is enough for me :) I have a dozen Fuji primes already so I’ll likely just stick with an X-H2S. I appreciate you taking the time! For now been filming handheld on the X-T3, figure there’s people out there ten billions times more talented using lesser gear than I already own do skill>gear, but looking forward to the upgrade as well to help. The main reason I never went full dive into video was the amount of time I already spent in post as a photographer. I knew adding sound design and hours of footage would only add to the post side. Any tips for someone who wants the highest quality video to look back on for the least amount of, or better said, most efficient use of, post time would be welcome. I like to try to master anything for fun so I’ll be going all in on video finally :)
It's important to set the whitebalance right you can take out the greenshift with the camera whitebalance settings. Sony hast always this strange yellowish tint for me extreme difficult to remove without affecting the whole footage. Do Do somebody has a solution for that?
Haven't really noticed what you are referring to, but I understand your frustration. White balancing is always a challenge and I have had trouble in post fixing it many times. Thanks for your comment!
keep up the good work! ✨
curious, what lens do you use for the fx30?
Thanks for the kind words! I use the Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 on my FX30, it's the only Sony lens I own currently!
@@AntonJDCreatives y como comentas mas arriba que usas Sigma 18-35 para la fx30 ?
FX30 footage looks sharper, but it could be due to the lens choice as someone already mentioned. I do not like the sharpness as it makes it look less filmic but you can also take that sharpness away if you are skilled enough in davinci. The sony is also a little bit greener but that is what sony is famous for :)
Very true! Thank you for taking the time to comment.
In this video the Sony fx30 had 100% better colors.
That's exactly how I feel about this test. I think the Fuji has a green shift instead of the Sony, as opposed to what you always read online. Overall the FX30 just looks more pleasing to me here.
Is the AF Performance that much of a difference? I notice a lot of jumping in my XH2S while Video. Which settings do you use?
Thank you
Already someone who picked up on the little hidden AF test with me sitting down 😁 To be honest, in talking heads like this I don't think you can notice a significant difference. In run and gun work, the FX30 also struggles from time to time, it's no magic machine. But the X-H2s is indeed less reliable. As far as settings go, I don't fiddle with them too much. AF tracking is at +4 and speed at -3. Area mode and eye AF is almost always on. Thanks for your question!
the fx30 is probably the best camera for the price to performance ratio, but the they both have their advantages and disadvantages. They are both winners to me in their onw right.
They really are! Thank you so much for the comment.
colors - sony but bery sharp
I like the crispy look out of the Sony to be honest!
@@AntonJDCreatives Im usually not a fan of super sharpened images, but I think the Sony handles it really beautifully! Like it's not so jarring like other sharp cameras. It's sharp in a flattering way, idk