Best Telescope for Viewing the Planets - Celestron NexStar 8SE

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 164

  • @kylew4920
    @kylew4920 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    My 6 inch Mak-Cass is pretty darn good at that. 1800 FL with a 2X Barlow. The planets are up close and personal 😃

  • @terrycooper4149
    @terrycooper4149 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    The best telescope is one you'll use the most, the most portable at the best price point in value. Having a 12" goto Dobsonian, an 8" EdgeHD on an AVX mount, a 6" F/5 Celestron Newtonian, and an 8" F/5.9 Celestron Starsense Dobsonian--I'll use the 8" Dob the most. Love 'em all.

    • @Thisfutureman
      @Thisfutureman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Whats the price?

    • @SmackU718
      @SmackU718 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m new to this but I want to be able to zoom in real far and see some stuff what should I buy. Please help !

    • @muddirt8040
      @muddirt8040 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      All said and done what kind of cost am I looking at?

  • @jonnyreverb
    @jonnyreverb 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I agree. I was vheap and tried to put together a budget scope, and I wound up spending more money on the parts than if I had bought the 8se. After 15 years of upgrades I have a C8 on an 8se mount, do basically the 8se and a basement full of parts.

  • @flyboyu777
    @flyboyu777 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    A high quality f-6 or greater 8-12” Newtonian will beat almost all SCT’s on the planets due to improved contrast. Another great option is the 180 Maksutov sold by SkyWatcher.

    • @BjFoley
      @BjFoley 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You got that right i use an Orion skyquest 8 Newtonian on a Meade Lx85 goto mount

    • @neomatrix6115
      @neomatrix6115 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Question - won't the 8SE SCT have a higher magnification (and thus see craters better on the moon, etc.) due to longer focal length than an 8" dob? I'm very torn between the 8SE and the 8" or 10" Celestron StarSense Explorer (DOB)! Input appreciated!

    • @hideCarson
      @hideCarson หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@neomatrix6115what did you end up going with?

  • @martynh5410
    @martynh5410 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I think this is a solid recommendation. I’m using the Nexstar 8 EdgeHD and managed some great views of planets with it. Pretty good for Astro photography even with its slightly jerky AltAz mount. A few thousand frames of video stacked can give great results. I’ve seen all the planets plus Pluto (although to be fair Pluto only as an image and it looked like a dim star!).

  • @Boxxkarr
    @Boxxkarr 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I use a 102mm Celestron Omni AZ, and a Baader zoom eyepiece, for my grab and go to see that, or my 10 inch Dobsonian if I have time and energy to set it up. I can see this 8 SC is like a combination of those 2! The price is a little more than both combined, but i like the Go To, and compact size of the 8SC.

  • @DavidAlexJonas
    @DavidAlexJonas หลายเดือนก่อน

    The best I had was a Celestron C14. I now have an 8” Meade SC. The C14 was magnificent! At a focal length of 3910 mm, the planets looked great.

  • @muddirt8040
    @muddirt8040 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    How much said and done in cost?? I been looking for this exact visual. !!

  • @JaxPlays251
    @JaxPlays251 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    i bought the Apertura AD8 afew days ago, cant wait to look at the planets and stars with it!

    • @twisterwiper
      @twisterwiper 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you don’t mind me asking. How has your experience been? I’m considering the similar GSO 8” which is available in my part of world. Thanks.

    • @JackHudack
      @JackHudack 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It will outperform any 8 inch SCT

  • @roadboat9216
    @roadboat9216 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very nice. I have a nexstar CPC 8. With the twin fork mount. The mount is more stable, especially for photography. But is is heavier and not as portable.

  • @OnlineLearningCS
    @OnlineLearningCS 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    My Sky-Watcher SkyMax 180 Pro Maksutov-Cassegrain has a better focal length at 2700mm. It is not a beginners telescope, but I feel it is a better planetary telescope than the 8SE.

    • @oceanside2152
      @oceanside2152 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those Maks are awesome on the planets. Over 150 mm they're better than the 8 inch music store that doesn't like to sell percussion..
      ...
      Wait for it....
      ...
      ...
      ....
      The 8-inch Sell Less Drum !
      ...
      Thank you I'm here all week

  • @jeannettejimenez5228
    @jeannettejimenez5228 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Que precioso, lo felicito!!!

  • @Jellyman1129
    @Jellyman1129 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A 7” Mak-Cass is also fantastic with a focal length of 2700mm. It’s literally nicknamed “The Planet Killer”.

  • @Azop_live
    @Azop_live 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    is 500mm Optical tube length and 80mm Lens diameter of the objective??

  • @viniciusmagalhaes385
    @viniciusmagalhaes385 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    my dream!

  • @jaygallant8635
    @jaygallant8635 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    Yeah. My 10” dob sees the planets just fine and clear. And it’s half the price of the nexstar

    • @nicusorbenny4434
      @nicusorbenny4434 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree.

    • @Faheemm-o3x
      @Faheemm-o3x ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What is the price of your telescope and can I buy a good telescope under 30k for planets moon and to see the moons of planets plz rply

    • @HelloThere-gv5os
      @HelloThere-gv5os ปีที่แล้ว

      How kuch

    • @HelloThere-gv5os
      @HelloThere-gv5os ปีที่แล้ว

      Much

    • @yannisjaeh8690
      @yannisjaeh8690 ปีที่แล้ว

      and has more light gathering capacity

  • @KINGCUZ51773
    @KINGCUZ51773 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When are they gonna make it have automatic tracking features using your phone?

  • @Roblify
    @Roblify 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Going to get a Celestron NexStar 4SE, but hey, may not be as powerful as the 8SE, but its still pretty dang cool, and its $600, the 8SE is $1.4K on amazon

  • @andreaslack8379
    @andreaslack8379 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would have loved to get Nexstar 8SE or bigger but the weight was just too much. I got a Nexstar 6SE which seems adequate

  • @bikashkarak319
    @bikashkarak319 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beautiful ❤️❤️

  • @amymbeauty8765
    @amymbeauty8765 ปีที่แล้ว

    Okay, hopefully you can help me out. Im a beginner, and I've learned some things just taking it out and using it a few times, but i can never seem to get it to allign properly. What are the basic accessories that you would recommend for a beginners ease of use? Such as things like the wifi module, battery supply, initial lenses, and is something like the $450 star sense thing necessary, and does it really help? Lol, any advice and a basic list would be immensely helpful because the only thing I've been able to view accurately is the moon. Thanks in advance!

    • @highpointscientific
      @highpointscientific  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Amy! These are all great questions. We can go into much further detail with you and get you on your way viewing the planets and deep sky objects. In regards to something like this, we recommend you email our team at Highpointscientific.com! We will be more than happy to point you in the right direction! :)

  • @mohitastrophotography8499
    @mohitastrophotography8499 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What about deep sky objects ? Is this telescope ideal for deep sky astrophotography?

    • @highpointscientific
      @highpointscientific  12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Unfortunately, it is not suited for deep sky use. The supplied alt-azimuth mount is not accurate or solid enough for long exposures with such a long focal length telescope

  • @_stardust62
    @_stardust62 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hasn't the new Celestron Evolution taken the next Nexstar8 place?...i do own the Nexstar, the 8 inch is the best aperture for most folks.

  • @Ked778
    @Ked778 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would you recommend the 8SE or Celestron C8 with a decent tracking mount?

    • @highpointscientific
      @highpointscientific  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hi! The Nexstar 8SE is a fantastic system overall. If you took that optical tube off and paced it on a heavy duty EQ style mount, that would be great! Keep in mind however that the overall system will be heavier, more costly, and less portable overall.

  • @dominquejam
    @dominquejam 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can it use for long range mountain view

  • @Forest99279
    @Forest99279 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You Don’t need 8 inch. You can have 4-8 inch and easily view planets nebula and galaxy. But with 4 inch it will be less detailed

  • @jessicaramirez9200
    @jessicaramirez9200 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dumb question but would a Sky-Watcher 200 Dobsoniab 8’ aperture work ? 😅

  • @Astronurd
    @Astronurd ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Decent OTA but the mount is terrible. Touch the focuser and it vibrates so much you can't see the target clearly to reach proper focus.

    • @Astro_Ash_Jeremy
      @Astro_Ash_Jeremy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lower the mount legs, vibration pads, and set the scope on a concrete surface. Problem solve 👌🏻

    • @Astronurd
      @Astronurd 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Astro_Ash_JeremyNo I just bought a proper EQ mount and a 10" Maksutov.

  • @hvboy2131
    @hvboy2131 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about a 16 inch dobsonian? I have one of those

  • @alvint4944
    @alvint4944 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there a non-computerized version of this telescope?

  • @kimex5164
    @kimex5164 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i got the evo 9,25. amazing scope!

  • @mbfamilychannel3456
    @mbfamilychannel3456 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there a professional company that cleans them? Name website etc please

    • @JackHudack
      @JackHudack 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Celestron itself or possibly company 7

  • @viniciusmagalhaes385
    @viniciusmagalhaes385 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    very expensive here in Brazil

    • @davidrhp847
      @davidrhp847 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not cheap anywhere. As he said in the title the best beginner telescope. $1500 on Amazon U.S.

  • @burrito_banditt4505
    @burrito_banditt4505 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where can I buy this?

  • @jimbop6614
    @jimbop6614 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Pimp my Celeston NexStar SE8 scope! 😁

  • @gamingmisthios
    @gamingmisthios 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best budget telescope for phone? ( Viewing planets and milky way )

  • @alticoo
    @alticoo หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had a Celestron 9.25 and that gave me some extraordinary views of universe. it's a great telescope. Now I have a n old apanese refractor, it's very good for planetary obrevations, it gave me some beautiful views of Mars during its 2020 great opposition.

  • @groundhoppingwlkp3622
    @groundhoppingwlkp3622 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For viewing 7 inch Mak Cass is even stronger option. Celestron 8 wins in astrophotography with options to reduce focal lenght (6,3 reducer and hyperstar to f2)

  • @jponz85
    @jponz85 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the 4se... what's the main difference between the 4se and 8se? I'm curious as they look practically the same lol even color too haha

    • @kenh733
      @kenh733 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      One is 4” and one is 8” the 8” would bring in more light I’m guessing

    • @oceanside2152
      @oceanside2152 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Simply aperture..
      The 4 inch will do a great job on the planets.. especially if you catch a nice clear and still night!

  • @urbandeepsky8445
    @urbandeepsky8445 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4” APO f9 is better on most nights than my C8…. More to it than theoretical applications. Seeing and thermal realities are mostly the limiting factors

  • @NaturalBornKelli
    @NaturalBornKelli 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Purchase a Nikon P900, P950, or P1000 with a tripod and Thousand Oaks solar filters to safely observe the sun. You won't regret it - these cameras are far superior to any affordable telescope, from $0 to around $10k, and are offered at an unbeatable price. However, you must act quickly, as Nikon has discontinued all three models. This decision is entirely unreasonable, as they are among Nikon's best-selling cameras. If you know the truth about where we live, you will understand why these gems are being discontinued.

    • @neutronenstern.
      @neutronenstern. 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what are you talking about?

  • @The.RandomTube
    @The.RandomTube ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've heard a lot of fiasco about requiring a power switch for the telescope, what's up about that?

    • @highpointscientific
      @highpointscientific  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They may be referring to the use of an AC adapter. This is recommended over the option 8 x AA batteries as the AC adapter supplies constant and consistent power over then entire duration of use!

    • @The.RandomTube
      @The.RandomTube ปีที่แล้ว

      @@highpointscientific Oh gotcha, Thank you soo much! Looking forward to getting the nexstar 8SE soon!

  • @DouglasLippert
    @DouglasLippert ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Celestron C5 is the better choice for most people.

  • @Vates104
    @Vates104 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can I see Ceres with this?

  • @Wolf21973
    @Wolf21973 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's cool, but what about for someone who is just starting out and has a budget of 300 dollars? Lol. I don't expect it to be like this, of course, I just know very little of telescopes.

    • @nms8382
      @nms8382 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Find your local astronomical society, they can guide you and you will probably be able to use a few different types begore committing to purchasing one.... Good luck

  • @skywatcherca
    @skywatcherca ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Respectfully, if you truly believe that the Celestron NexSTAR 8SE is the best telescope for viewing planets - ok, well you are wiser than I am and we certainly DO NOT agree: I'd much rather use a 7" or 7.5" REFRACTOR, or a 14" Celestron HD EDGE or a 16" Meade ACF LX200.

    • @highpointscientific
      @highpointscientific  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      In these recommendations we are considering price point, ease of use, portability, and performance. We definitely understand that a 7.5" refractor or a 16" SCT would perform very well in comparison. A 32" Obsession would be awesome as well! These recommendations are multifactorial with the beginner and intermediate amateur astronomers in mind.

    • @Ked778
      @Ked778 ปีที่แล้ว

      Those scopes are way more expensive you bonehead.

    • @Ked778
      @Ked778 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Even I can say that I'd much rather use the JWST instead of your HD EDGE and Meade ACF

    • @RoshanD.Ra1
      @RoshanD.Ra1 ปีที่แล้ว

      What’s the best telescope on the market regardless of price?

    • @terrycooper4149
      @terrycooper4149 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The best telescope is one you'll use the most, the most portable at the best price point in value. Having a 12" goto Dobsonian, an 8" EdgeHD on an AVX mount, a 6" F/5 Celestron Newtonian, and an 8" F/5.9 Celestron Starsense Dobsonian--I'll use the 8" Dob the most. Love 'em all.

  • @lordprotector3367
    @lordprotector3367 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe, but all I can see with mine is bright lights, certainly no colour, unlike with my Nikon P1000. Why is that?

  • @aguyfromneptune1616
    @aguyfromneptune1616 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    StarSense 10” ?

  • @Jeremy-13312
    @Jeremy-13312 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How much does it cost?

  • @NWWsnapMOAB
    @NWWsnapMOAB 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i got makustov 90/1250 i can see the bands on jupiter saturn but i did not capture mars yet

  • @fragmenteddiamond
    @fragmenteddiamond ปีที่แล้ว

    How use?

  • @MM0IMC
    @MM0IMC ปีที่แล้ว +3

    An eight inch Dobsonian is far cheaper and even better!

    • @Astro_Ash_Jeremy
      @Astro_Ash_Jeremy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is not better but is cheaper 👌🏻

  • @starastronomer
    @starastronomer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It must be an Astro-Physics refractor 👀🔭😉

  • @donaldking757
    @donaldking757 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sorry have used a Nexsrar SE8 and my 8 in Apertura AD8 kicks it ass

    • @makncheese2727
      @makncheese2727 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which telescope do u use cause I’m tryna get a better telescope

  • @dukemarlar1740
    @dukemarlar1740 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    1500$ it better be badass

  • @Zane268
    @Zane268 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It doesnt have to be a Schmidt-Cassegrain.

  • @Harshhh_0807
    @Harshhh_0807 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are yhh using aaj tak bgm?

  • @Lion-pu4vm
    @Lion-pu4vm 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And a cheaper version? 😅 maybe about 7% of the celestron’s price ? 😊

  • @Spieler2049
    @Spieler2049 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bernhard schmidt was a friend of my grandpa

  • @VASTVOiiD
    @VASTVOiiD 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How much

  • @JohnnysCafe_
    @JohnnysCafe_ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If Galileo could have seen what this telescope can it would have blown his mind in the best way.

  • @rubio90r
    @rubio90r ปีที่แล้ว

    What about nexstar evolution 9.25?

  • @khai.2.2
    @khai.2.2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can’t wait until I get a job 😐

  • @Alex-x8k8u
    @Alex-x8k8u ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The best telescope would be a APO refractor ,4 inch and up…has no central obstruction ,F10 and up….my opinion..

    • @BjFoley
      @BjFoley 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's very true but most people can not Afford a premium Apo Telescope 8.newtonian still better

  • @gerryroush8391
    @gerryroush8391 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would rather have a 4 inch Teleview or Takahashi 😊 🔭

  • @IngramSnake
    @IngramSnake 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jupiter scares me

  • @bawihzikapautu448
    @bawihzikapautu448 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You can find your long lost alien cousins ❤

  • @AmatureAstronomer
    @AmatureAstronomer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And, for elder and feeble folks like me, it must weigh less than 8 pounds, which rules out the 8", which weighs 12 pounds. The 6" weighs 6 pounds, add in a Sky Watcher AZ GTi mount at 8.5 pounds and a ZWO ASI294 cooled camera at 1 pound, you get 15.5 pounds. Nice.

  • @redstonecommander5190
    @redstonecommander5190 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Here’s a fun fact about Jupiter that you just shown on the video. Jupiter is one of the largest planets in the solar system.
    The great red spot on Jupiter is a continuous storm system that can contain more than three earths. Gas Planets, such as Jupiter contains no solid surfaces rather its gashes material becomes denser in deeper parts of the planet. Jupiter’s 3 rings can move at speeds up to 400 mph.

  • @wesleyjohnson597
    @wesleyjohnson597 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about a 127 mak

  • @mikemuha7537
    @mikemuha7537 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My 12" Meade Coma free has a longer focal length and better contrast.

    • @FISHGOOSE-td6sw
      @FISHGOOSE-td6sw 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s also thousands more dollars 💀

    • @Astro_Ash_Jeremy
      @Astro_Ash_Jeremy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well duhhh ! If I’m paying more thousands, I better have better everything 😂

  • @jrlv62
    @jrlv62 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    That’s a $1600 telescope, can you come up with something a little cheaper?

  • @Chumlee69
    @Chumlee69 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks cool my wallet is looking really dry so yes maybe in some other lifetime

  • @Zeron18
    @Zeron18 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The best telescope is the one that gets used the most.

  • @debbielegros9828
    @debbielegros9828 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have the 6se

    • @StKnightis64
      @StKnightis64 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s the one I’m hoping to buy this year. Like it?

  • @anata5127
    @anata5127 ปีที่แล้ว

    Big boy like you should prefer 14” Celestron.

  • @rakeshkumar-hb9yx
    @rakeshkumar-hb9yx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bro do you think in India I'm gonna spend 2.5k dollars to buy a telescope to just view 7 planets and a moon

  • @BjFoley
    @BjFoley 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So dose my skyquest xt8 Newtonian Reflector

  • @AllesWirdGut1502
    @AllesWirdGut1502 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i have a Celestron C8 and a relativly cheap Newton 250mm... and the Newton beats the C8 by far. My old selfbuild Newton 150mm beats the C8 also.

  • @kevinburke8608
    @kevinburke8608 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had a Celestron Comet Catcher as a kid... I love SCTs. I remember looking at the planets through that... Now have a C9.25
    8" is an awesome scope and would be happy with either. 8" is the sweet spot between capability and cost... That thing has Faststar too...

  • @thanosp.8140
    @thanosp.8140 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    People mentioning their inches in the comments is weird. 😂

  • @KrazyCone
    @KrazyCone 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Btw it’s 1,500$

  • @lcmattern
    @lcmattern ปีที่แล้ว +1

    only downside compared to my 5" telesecope that cost around 200$ is this one is more than 7x the price :/ At this point might as well go for a 5k one.

  • @sulproductions_
    @sulproductions_ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you a bit I bought the cheapest one £165

  • @tanayaprasanna9249
    @tanayaprasanna9249 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    bro not all telescopes need to be 8" to view jupiter

    • @highpointscientific
      @highpointscientific  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are correct! But considering price point and budget, performance, portability, ease of use, and size - the Nexstar 8se is a great option that many beginner and advanced enthusiasts agree upon.

  • @akishamalupet6744
    @akishamalupet6744 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I wish i have a telescope pike that but im a 7 year old kid

  • @SterlingFoley-cr8xl
    @SterlingFoley-cr8xl 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hate to Disappoint you the nextstar 8 is not the Best A 8" Newton reflector or better yes the Orion Cc8

    • @SterlingFoley-cr8xl
      @SterlingFoley-cr8xl 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The 8 se has a lot of Images history or mirror Flop in it

  • @CarmySCL
    @CarmySCL 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    yes but it costs $2000

  • @frankguyton9596
    @frankguyton9596 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The 8 not the best the 14 is the best.

    • @Cakebattered
      @Cakebattered ปีที่แล้ว

      But you'll use the 8" way more. That 14" is a beast to move around.

    • @Astro_Ash_Jeremy
      @Astro_Ash_Jeremy ปีที่แล้ว

      Well duhhh ! He means for the price is one of the best. Of course is better The 14 cost is almost 10 grand and the 11 is 5grand, the 8 is 1,500 and performs on planets not far off. in that case the 14 is not the best. The Hubble and jwst are

    • @Rick-or2kq
      @Rick-or2kq ปีที่แล้ว

      You cannot carry around the 14" with tripod like you can the 8". The 14 is great if you have a permeant observatory set-up. But I would say the 8" is the largest aperture you can carry with tripod comfortably.

  • @TheInvisibleOrange26
    @TheInvisibleOrange26 ปีที่แล้ว

    Must have a saveings account and high paying job to afford

  • @chrisg9602
    @chrisg9602 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The 8 Evo is better. The tripod is better then the Se

    • @Astro_Ash_Jeremy
      @Astro_Ash_Jeremy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They have same OPT ..and It cost 1000 dollars more for a slightly better mount . With that money i can just get even a better mount and add it to the SE

  • @YScript
    @YScript 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So I guess it is not suitable for deep space

  • @LiterallyPluto
    @LiterallyPluto 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    cool let me just sell my car

  • @RobotSnake
    @RobotSnake 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Definitely not the best. Most popular maybe.

  • @lapisredux
    @lapisredux 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    planets....refractor.

  • @thunder7382
    @thunder7382 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    nope.. C14 👋😬

  • @DanHidden
    @DanHidden 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not absolutely the best

  • @makemystronger..freemegapi6800
    @makemystronger..freemegapi6800 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not Barlow used?

  • @vinod_54
    @vinod_54 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    𝑯𝒐𝒘 𝒎𝒖𝒄𝒉?

  • @kikepena2896
    @kikepena2896 ปีที่แล้ว

    @jaygallant8635 ???