It is very clear, and many photographers giving advice to the less experienced will tell you the same for prime lenses "you will zoom in and out with your feet" as you get close of far from your subject.
The first lens I bought was a Canon 50mm 1.8. The "Nifty Fifty" or "Plastic "Fantastic". I paid something like $135 with tax on sale around Christmas. Lens blew me away. Bokeh!!!!! (look it up) Plus it helped me learn and play around with various setting and got me more comfortable with manual mode. You can probably get a used one anywhere from $65-$90 CDN. honestly, for the price of that lens, there is NO better value. Primes will open up another aspect of photography for you. Canon 50mm 1.8 MK II or Canon 50mm 1.8 STM. I have upgraded to the STM, but both are all killer and no filler!
I went with the 50 1.4 for my first lens. I feel it was worth the extra cash. The build quality is great and I love the wider aperture. That said, I'm sure I would have been super happy with a nifty 50. I plan on hanging on to this 1.4 for quite some time!
I had the 1.8 II and burrowed the 1.4 While the autofocus is better on the 1.4 it can't reach the accuracy of the new 1.8 stm. This stm autofocus nails it 95% of the time and it's cheaper and lighter.
If throwing the budget out the window, may I recommend the Canon 17-55 constant f/2.8. This lens is fabulous. The only caveat to this lens is that it is just an EF-S and does not wear the badge of a red ring. Otherwise, it is one of the fabulous choice to go for APS-C sensor DSLR. Cheers.
I think if someone is buying the 70D and has the money get the 18-135mm STM lens. It's a good walking around lens for video and stills. It's seams to be sharp to. Good video Toby.
yes its a good lens on good thing and bad at the same time I guess is that its Sooo quiet. why is it bad.. Its not really I know the beep tells you when your in focus but it took me some time to believe it with out the R2D2 noise. And quiet is not the word DEAD silence. even with my ear right up next to it. I can barely tell when its moving and I have found the grinding of my other lenses really annoying now.
i just shot with it last night shooting a concert for a job. i found it very soft overall in a low light environment. it works great in bright daylight but in dark siturations, not so much. f5.6 @ 1/250 second at 800 iso. disappointed :(
Hello Toby! About a year ago you recommended the Sigma 17-50mm lens that I now own and LOVE! I have a newborn and have been doing quite a few portraits using my 50mm 1.4. I've started contemplating at 85mm lens. Namely the 1.8. I would love to hear your thoughts.
Okay few cooky questions. First off I had a 60D with the kit 18-55mm and 55-250mm. I sold that on eBay and recently purchased a 70D. Other lenses I purchased as of recently include; - EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM - EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM - EF 50mm f/1.8 STM I do have a tripod, monopod, external flash and possibly considering some SPL housing being that I live at the beach. Currently I have about $800 perhaps $1k to spend on another piece of glass. I have been told not to spend it unless I know what I need but this was money I put away for this purpose and if I don't use it now, its gone. Ideally I would get something else to help round out my collection to give me the most versatility possible. I am looking for any input. In addition, aside from my lens budget, does anyone feel the extra $300 is worth it to upgrade to the 80D? I can still swap my 70D out for a few more days. I just don't know the extra focal points makes any difference to me.
just pulled the trigger for the 24 105L, white box from full frame kit, paired it with my gripped 650D... couldn't be happier... tried at the shop the 18 135 stm and sigma 17 50 2.8, which feels its not much a substantial upgrade from crop kit lens... and yes, I don't miss the 18 23 range...
I'm surprised you recommended the 40mm over the 24mm, the 24mm on crop sensors becomes almost a 35mm which is a great focal length for street photography and it's also tiny and really cheap.
That may be true Nathan but I feel like a 24mm (35mm in this case) is a much more versatile focal length. You can do somewhat wide angle photography, while still being able to get decent reach with your lens. Also, the 24mm 2.8 is so damn cute on a camera body haha
I have the kit lens 18mm-55mm, and eventually got both the 24mm and 40mm(cheap). The 18mm barely gets out of my bag now. The pancake lenses are far better. I've done the test on the 18mm-55mm at 24mm and then 40mm, and then compare the photos with pancakes. In low light, the kit lens is merely murky and dark while the pancakes are sharp and clear.. The f2.8 of the two pancakes is wonderful. I recently rented a t7i with the new Digic7 processor, and the pancakes produced some incredible photos at Yosemite. Pancakes allow for using a lot smaller camera bag too. Street photos with the 40mm is my favorite, and the 24mm is good too.
I got the 70D with the 18-200 lense, it was a bit of a deal, though nothing to scream about. I did a quick week or so of reading on it and it seemed to be given great reviews and such where-ever I looked. But it's obviously not mentioned her, would you say it's a decent "all round" lense, disbarring it's price range. As you said the primes are better for more in-door shots, but my focus will be scenery, action shots of my dogs and other animals as well as random shooting, night exposure shots while traveling to Japan over the next year. If there is a cheap "alternate" lense you would recommend for something that the 18-200 just plain isn't suited for, that might give me overall a better experience with any one of these things, I might consider getting that as well, whether soon or later down the line. That said, i'm very beginner in photography. It's a dabbling interest and thus why I haven't had a decent DSLR like the 70D until... well now. Cheers.
Thanks for the Video. I recently got the 70D and I got these three lenses, and my next purchases (later down the track). 18-135 STM Kit - Awesome default lens it really is. Covers most family situations beautifully and the STM video with 70d is magic. 50 1.8 II - This I call my training lens. I have this lens to teach me photography, I have to move and compose my shots with care, and I get to play with DOF and light a lot more. It's also dirt cheap. Sigma 18-250mm Macro - This is my Travel lens. It's a nice telephoto range, and it works quite well for covering your range on the run. I'd usually have the 50mm in the pocket for low-light indoor though. So that is where I've started, and I'm super happy with the 3 starters. Where I go next is... Canon 40mm STM - it might be similar to the 50mm, but it's purpose is for lower light video and super light party lens. (it's also super cheap, so happy to have both). Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 - Instead of buying wider primes, I'll save up for this puppy. I know I won't be disappointed. Canon 100mm Macro 2.8 ( would love the IS L version but $$$ ) - A great lens for macro, but also wonderful for higher end portraits. Tokina 11-16 ATX Pro AF - ( I may get this guy if I really want some nice wide landscape or architecture photos, but it's a maybe. ) And after that I think the wife will cut my credit card, so doubtful if I'll make it to the L lenses that I'm also dreaming of. So method to my madness? G.
You have laid out several great options there and I'd like to hear more about what you like to photograph and the direction you want to go. I could then make a more inteligent recommendation - that said, all of those lenses on your list are either lenses I own or want to - so that's a good sign :)
I'm interested in exploring most types of photography. Especially Portrait, Landscape, Wildlife, and Macro, not so much Sport or Event Photography. I've just ordered a YN-568EXii with some 622Cs for offcam strobist stuff as well. Your video's have been incredibly useful Toby, so a big thanks for all your work mate.
Glenn Brown You do want to do it all :) Or almost all. You have to narrow it down before I can make a recommendation - The macro is quite different than anything else you currently own. - longer focal length with f/2.8.
Ha, I do indeed!! I was looking at the Canon 100mm 2.8 (not sure if IS L version is worth the stretch) or Tokina 100mm or maybe longer. Macro is a less pressing need at this stage so I can hold off a bit. Thanks again CameraRec Toby
BxSQUIRREL I couldn't reply to your comment - so linking instead - Any full frame lens will work just fine on a crop sensor- you do have to multiply by 1.6 to get what will be the true field of view - so it acts like a 112mm to 320mm but it will be excellent and the common complaint about that Sigma is soft corner - with a crop sensor those will be a non-issue.
Hello,i bought a 70d few days ago,but i by a 18-200mm efs,do i do the wrong choice? I was in doubt for a 18-135 stm or this one..Did i do wrong choice? Thanks..
R.D. P. I personally am not a fan of the do-it-all lenses, the lenses that cover 18-200 or more. They are certainly convenient but in my opinion you make sacrifices in image quality and convenience. The 18-135 range is about as high as I think someone should go. Do you want to do video? The STM of the 18-135 means video will be smooth and silent while autofocusing. with the 18-200 you will hear the lens as it autofocuses.
Ali Polaris I owned the 7D for over a year! Fantastic camera at the time but with the features of the 70D and the dual pixel AF I don't see any reason to go with 7D over the 70D for video work.
Ali Polaris get 70D like i said 3 lens u need for photos n video 18-135stm lens a 24-105 L red ring lens and 55-250 stm lens and your never go wrong and 32 gig sandisk class 10 sd card n extra insurance
I have the Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS and it's an outstanding lens. Very sharp, IS allows ridiculously slow handholds in low light and it focuses extremely fast.
Just purchased the Canon 80D and 70-200mm f/4 IS USM, then learned about crop factor and how it affects aperture. This combo still provides fantastic shots even with crop factor bringing your f/4 down to an f/6.4? Glad you recommended that lens. Wasn’t sure what to get for a trip to Iceland.
I'd honestly recommend EF 85 f1.8 - awesome portrait lens for some tele action and 35 f2 (or 28 f1.8) for some wider shots. That's a budget solution, on my opinion probably the best. I personally use 85 f1.8 and Sigma 35 f1.4 with my Canon 60D and love every second of it...
Thanks for the tip. I bought a used 80D for pretty cheap and dumped the rest of the available funds on a Canon 17-55mm 2.8, sigma 18-35mm 1.8, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 10-22mm wide angle lens, and a canon 70-200mm 2.8 IS II. I'm good on lenses for now. Maybe get a macro lens next when I have money again.
Hi !! i just wonder about a few questions that Right now i got a Sigma 50mm f 1.4 art series. First question is what can i do with the lense (the most suitable purpose of using the len) Second is what is the best body i should get !
I have been following your advice on lenses with amazing results! I bought the sigma 50mm 1.4 for my Canon t5i and tried it out at my brothers wedding. He had low, romantic lighting for the reception and with this amazing lens I was able to capture the warmth of the existing lighting without requiring additional light sources. The shallow depth of field created phenomenal results in each shot. I kept getting the same comments from everyone.. "Wow that is an amazing camera!" My next lenses will be the sigma 18-35. Thank you!
Ted Munford Awesome to hear. We love our Sigmas, they did just announce a 24mm f/1.4 too - very excited for that, so much cheaper than the Canon version. photorec.tv/2015/02/sigma-24mm-f1-4-art-series-announced/
I have recently purchased the 70d and it has been a serious upgrade from my Rebel xTi. I did get the 18-135mm kit lens and also got the Sigma 10-20mm lens. I really should have watched your video sooner because I have already purchased the 24-105 f/4 lens! I wanted a little better walk around lens....my main focus is getting used to a lens before traveling in Europe. I'm figuring I will need a lens that can handle low light situations for museums, churches, etc. I know most do not allow flash photography. I'm not too keen on bringing a lot of lenses with me due to weight restrictions for carryon luggage. I also have a 50mm f1.8, which is super light.....will the 24-105 lens be a safe bet? I can imagine needing a zoom bigger than that (although I do have an older Canon 70-300mm lens, but wasn't planning on bringing it). I wish I had purchased the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 but was afraid it didn't have a large enough zoom for my needs while traveling in Europe. What are your thoughts?
After several trips last year, I realized what limitations I'm dealing with on my t5i with the kit lenses. If you give the kit lenses enough light the pictures can be stunningly clear, but when the sun starts dimming, so does the quality of the shot. Video is different, the quality there is excellent even at night for say a concert. I eventually picked up 40mm & 24mm STM lenses for less than $300 for both. These two lenses beat the pants off the kit lenses for gobbling up light, and just OK for video as well. 40mm is also a nice street lens at night. Both of these pancake lenses really worked well in Yosemite, which goes in and out of direct sunlight quite often. Take these pancakes and the kits and take comparison shots in a low light room, and the kit lens pics will be darker and muddier.
Very new to DSLR (Canon 70D Kit) so everything still sounds like French to me but I must say; there is no advice for your Instructor ability. Pretty clean and clear. Awesome!
Mehndiartist_Hira i would suggest the Sigma 10-20mm for a budget, wide angle lens that does excellent video. Also, the Rokinon 14mm lens which is amazingly sharp except there is no autofocus or image stabilization.
I just bought a 60D and knew I wanted a zoom lens to begin with. I liked that it came with the 18-135mm and I picked the 50-250mm as a second lens. I feel vindicated by your recommendations. I love both lenses. I had been borrowing a camera with a 17-55mm and a 70-300mm. They worked great, but I felt that something was missing with the spread between the 55 and 70mm.
I just bought the 70D today. Sams Club had a Sams only bundle that included the 18-55 STM kit lens and the 55-250 STM zoom lens, a 32 gig card and a 2nd battery....all for $1400. Im really happy that I got the 250 STM zoom in my bundle. This video really solidified my decision. Thanks.
Thanks for the video. I have a Canon 7D (crop sensor) and have a 50mm 1.4 prime. I find that the 50mm quite restrictive indoors in tight situations (especially if I need to take full length photos or groups Im having to half hang out of a window) I am looking at a getting a zoom. I photograph families, newborns as well as headshots. I know I will be ok with my current 50mm for the headshots and newborns but a zoom would be great for the family shots especially if I do indoor ones and need to do full length group shots. I have heard that the 18-35mm 1.8 would be a good investment but I would love your imput too,thanks
So I'm back for the second time haha. Now I am looking into prime lenses. and you pretty much summed me up in this video. My question is about the 50mm f/1.8 STM, the new and improved 50mm prime lens. I really want to get that shallow depth of field, bowkeh, etc for portraits. However, that is an EF lens correct. So on my 70d cropped sensor it will be around 80mm? I feel that, that is a bit too close. I don't think it would be right to have to back up so far to get the shot. What do you think? I can't find any other cheap alternatives with such a nice aperture.
Wish I would have seen this before I went out and upgraded to the 70D body only. I regret so much in not getting the savings for the kit lens and having the added features many other kit lenses do not offer! Great video Toby!
Very nice video Toby! I do quite a little bit of video shooting in low light, but most of it is handheld. what would be a better choice considering this, the 18-35 or the sigma 17-50? I need the bigger aperture, but IS is kind of must have when shooting handheld without any rigs. Thanks for your great help as always and keep them coming!
very helpful videos. thanks. I need a camera with video for doing videos for a web sight. I'm just wondering if the 18-135 stm lens will do what I need it to do. I'm also new to all of this, but am going to dive in and learn as much as possible.
Just curious, why do you prefer the f/4 over the f/2.8 in the 70-200mm? Both have an amazing reputation, but I would think the f/2.8 would be more versatile.
I would like to start of with saying thank you for the nice videos you make Toby. I have a question regarding Canon 70D, we want to use it for making videos On TH-cam, Indoors and outdoors, we have choosen the 70D because of the incredible autofokus. The camera will be on a tripod most of the time but we would like to have the option to film without a tripod as well. Because we love to travel and save the memories. What kind of Lens do you recommend for the task? I have thought about a wide lens because of the depth of field and wide angle.
Yes Toby, the 50mm 1.4 is an excellent lens, that is a steal at its price! I agree with your opinion and assessment of ultra wide angle lens. Don't want them don't need them.
I need some help Toby with finding the most appropriate lenses for my Canond 70D. Currently, I am using the Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS in an attempt to have a one-does-all lens, but have noticed it struggling in poor light, and not being able to magnify at far distances such as stages at an auditorium, or on the local soccer field. I am tempted by the Sigma 35mm 1.4 as the go to lens at walking distances, and maybe supplementing it with a telephoto lens (which I have no clue what length is good for the examples listed above). I am tempted to upgrade to a full frame camera to boost low light. Also, I am looking into flashes as I have a friend's birthday party coming up later this month. I have avoided flashes in an attempt to have more natural photos (and I normally shoot in the dad), but ideally it would be good to have something on the smaller side, have a rechargeable internal battery, and have a swivel/twist head. Finally, audio microphones! I have a RODE Stereo Video Mic PRO, but hoping there is something smaller, and doesn't required replaceable batteries. A lot to ask, so I'm fine with any insight you can shed.
Hi Toby- I purchased the Canon 70D almost 2 years ago and have been overall happy with it with the exception of indoor shots. I have the 18-55 kit lens and also a canon 50mm 1.8. I mainly use my kit lens for everyday stuff (indoors) and use my 50mm for outdoor portraits. I am wanting to upgrade my lenses for these reasons: one, I want a lens that does well in low light, indoors and gives nice sharp pictures for everyday stuff. Two, I need a better lens for my outdoor portraits (I take mostly families and children) as the 50mm prime drives me crazy! It gives great bokeh, but I hate the fact that it can not zoom and I am constantly stepping back and forth. I am wanting a lens that has some zooming capabilities but also gives a nice sharp picture and pretty bokeh. Also, another factor for me is that i do depend on auto focus when i photograph people. I have tried using manual focus and never seem to get it right. What would you recommend for someone like me? I am not a pro but do want my photos to reflect that of a pro photographer. Also, the budget is tight....suggestions? Thank you!!!!
I know that usually when thinking of upgrading, the lens is the way to go instead of upgrading the body. I have a canon t3 (not t3i, just the regular t3), and it does not compare in picture quality or features to any of my friends t3i and t5i using the same kit lens. I have been trying to decide on what to upgrade, torn between replacing the body with a 70d or 7d, or replacing the kit lens with the tamron 28-75mm or the canon 24-105mm L. Seeing as my camera falls short in so many categories, would a high-quality lens improve my photos more than a new body would?
hi dear, I am looking forward to purchase a Canon 70D. I am just a beginner and quite impressed by seeing review of canon 70D. Is it worth to buy with 18-55 mm IS II?
***** Yeah, will do. My budget is very tight, so unless Sigma come up with another amazing bang-for-buck lens with a similar focal range, I'll just stick to this one.
***** $200 when bought as the bundled deal! What do you want? lens is longer but lightweight -plastic mount is not an issue in this case. To much is made of that on the web. Suggestions for a better zoom in that price range?
CameraRec Toby the Tamron 70-300 VC is a great lens as well, and price-wise is between the 55-250 and that 70-200/4L you showed, and most reviews place the Tam 70-300VC image quality at very close to the 70-200/4L lens.
Hey Toby, I think that another great lens to consider is the Canon EF-S 15-85. it is a great lens, and even though it's not quite cheap it has a great value for money. It is very sharp, that extra 3mm on the wide side are very helpful (more than I could have imagined before I owned it) and it has lots of L lens qualities, as well as good "walk-around" range and USM motor with full time autofocus. If you're not planning on going full-frame in the next few years - this lens worth a look.
Great video as always. I have a 70d and I'm looking for a prime lens, the 50mm looks like a very good lens for the money. Will go down to my local camera store and test one out.
Hi Toby, thank you for sharing your thoughts on these lenses, but i have a particular question about which prime to buy. I already have a 70D with the 18-135 kit lens, but I'm searching for a prime lens. I'm not really the most professional photographer in the world, but when i'm on a trip with my family or friends, I'm always the man behind the camera. A lot of my pictures are portraits of my friends and landscapes/street photos. I really hope you can give me a good suggestion about which lens to buy. Thanks
what crop lense would you recommend for wedding and portrait photography? I use a Canon 70D and have been doing a lot of photo shoots and a few weddings lately. I also do a bit of video as well.
Hi, I've been contemplating of getting Sigma 17-70mm 2.8/4 Macro or the Sigma 17-50mm f2.5 lens... What's your suggestion? Which lens should I be getting for my DSLR... I've tried both, and the result's still a little inconclusive... which lens would be a "better" upgrade from the kit lens that comes w/ my Canon DSLR (T5i), thanks a lot!
i have been using the 50 mm f/1.8 and 40mm f/2.8 and my kit lens but i have made a big investment i purchased a Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 i have just got it what type of shots should i take to practice and learn the characteristics of the lens thanks for your videos
How is this for a basic starter system and would you recommend some changes? Thanks. Canon EOS 70D with 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 STM Lens Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 Lens Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM Lens
I don"t know if anyone already said this. But full frame lenses on crop sensor have different fstop and focal length. Fe the 50mm f/1.8 full frame lens will become 80mm f/2.9 on a crop sensor.
Really enjoy the info…I'm interested in getting an everyday lens and I'm leaning towards the canon 85mm f1.8. I'm need to the dslr world and I respect your opinion so what are your thoughts? I'm also very interested in the sigma 18-35 f1.8.Thanks in advance for your help.
Hey Toby, had a few questions. So I was planning on buying a canon 70d, but wasn't going to get it new (eBay) and the body. I'm pretty sure I'm gonna get an 18-135 stm, a 70-300 (both canon), but on the tamron 28-75. I heard that the 28-75 was very loud when af is this true? Also is it worth it to get the 50-250 stm vs. the 70-300? Thanks keep up the work
I have a very common question that should i invest on body or lens, i want camera more for videos and little bit of photography, or may i go for NIKON D7100.
Hi. Thanks for the recommendations. It's all nicely done. I recently took a course in photography, and I'm all set to take great photos - hopefully! Problem is, I find the 18-135mm lens on my Canon 70D lacking in quality, especially with indoor shots. Would you recommend investing in a Tamron 28-75 F/2.8, a Canon EF 50mm F/1.4 or a Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4.5 -6 IS STM? I am mainly interested in photographing my kid, and taking great shots whilst traveling, since we go on vacations often. I'd really appreciate some guidance.
Been using the 70D with 18-135 for years. Looking to get better sharpness and better colour with a better lens. I shoot video primarily. What do you recommend? I'd like to start at around 18, but don't need huge zoom. I do need lens that is quiet and fast enough on zoom. The 50 1.2 does a great job, but zoom is loud and slow.
hi, i am wondering which lense to get. my budget is about $1000 for a starter bundle. but am willling to do my own bundle within reason. I love taking family pics with landscape showing in the background, and also landscape photos, and wildlife. these are my main interest to start with. Oh also, the night sky. I will be purchasing the canon t6s. thanks
Thank you for the video,,, I have canon 70D and got a 50mm lens from canon with f1.4 and USM drive. I love taking photos for landscape. Do you think I should have another 24 mm lens, or better to get the 18 to 35 mm one from sigma you have spoken about in your video ?
Nice! I have decided that I would buy a 60D plus a 70-200 F4 L, since I already have the 50mm 1.8 (yeah, the nifty fifty), but Im bit confused which wider lens I will buy. That Tamron looks really nice and its not that expensive. Do you recommend to buy an used Tamron?
recommendation for concert photography: what lens should I used for sharp photos and also that will have enough zoom to get close into the stage? (sorry about my English) ? Thanks.
quick question! i just bought the cannon 70d to shoot short films, but the quality is grainy in dem light & sometimes in regular light. which lens would you recommend that will give me that clear sharp look?
I cover this in here Photo Mish Mash Podcast -Episode #1!! - Reader Questions- Picture Styles, Low Light Quality and a prime lens is what you want. Recommended Canon Prime Lenses
I think it would be a great idea comparing the video quality of the 70d vs. both generations of 5d mark 2 and 3. Can you also use the same cheaper lenses on the cameras? Like the 18-135 lens on both cameras. And please compare side by side.
FYI - 18-135 STM is an EF-S lens, only fits on APS-C cameras like 70D, T5i(700D) etc. Won't fit/mount on full frame camera. I probably will test with a nice prime lens.
Hello, I have a canon t6. Right now I mostly use a 50mm f1.8 and the kit lens 18-55mm. I do automotive photography. What lens could I use that would have a very wide range for close ups detailed pictures and far away pictures?
Hi Toby, I've been doing a lot of street photography lately, and I find my current 50mm f1.8 + 70D combo way too tight for my liking. I'm looking to get closer to my subjects (people doing stuff or walking about), and nice bokeh to go along. I've kinda settled on Tokina 11-16 f2.8, but can you perhaps recommend me an alternative, faster wide-angle prime lens around the same price range as the Tokina?
Hey. Awesome video! I'm going to rent the t5i to see if that is the camera I want to upgrade to for my tech videos. What lens would you recommend me renting it with if I shot smartphones reviews and other tech related content? Thanks.
ok, I just need to get something cleared up and I do hope you can assist. I am looking to purchase a 70D and get a 24-105 lens. I know I must multiply by 1.6 to get the field of view..but what I want to know if I also have to multiply the f stop as well or will it remain at f4 still?
Hello, thanks for the recommendations. I own a Canon 7D. I've been shooting for a year now with a EF-S 18-200mm, EF 50mm f1.8 and a Sigma 8-16mm. I'm happy with the results but miss faster lenses for low light situations. I'm thinking to go with the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 and Sigma DC 50-150mm f2.8 + a 2x teleconverter. What do you think? Thanks.
Tody, thanks for the great videos! Really helps when your new in the field and looking for answers. I am just entering the Real Estate field and using the T5i. What is the best wide angle lens to use? Obviously I want to get the most I can in every shot and want the highest quality as well.
What should be my first prime lens for a canon SL2 crop sensor camera? I’ll be using the camera to record TH-cam videos in my room to promote my small business products!
I am debating whether to get a Canon 6d or 70d, I've watched your comparison video, however I plan to do a lot of run and gun shooting in mostly low-light situations and on a low budget. The full-frame sensor on the 6d along with the price is very attractive and also the full-frame lenses and not having to deal with the crop factor of the 70d is attractive. However, because I plan on doing run and gun shooting, the AF system of the 70d also caught my eye, since the 6d has no AF in video mode at all. Back to lenses, I am looking for a lense that is good for filming that includes IS and a low aperture from about f/2.8- f/1.4 because I will not have time to set up a tripod or have the money for a shoulder rig or steadycam and I plan on having lots of bokeh in my film. I've been going crazy on choosing between the two cameras and lens options, Please Help!
I have a Canon T3 (1100D), and am trying to shoot a lot of night photography. I also shoot in otherwise a lot of low light situations, and the 1100D is just noisy. I'm about to upgrade either with lenses or the body itself. I have the 50 F1.8, 55-250 mk ii (non STM), and the 18-55 kit mk ii (also not STM). Most of what I come across says to upgrade your lenses before the body, but I was thinking of jumping to the 7D mk ii when it comes out. I think the general rule is to upgrade lenses, but going from a T3 to a 7D mk ii is a pretty big upgrade for the body. Do you think that upgrade would still be less of an 'upgrade' than getting a better lens or two? Also, I understand for low light, that an upgrade to full frame would probably be even more justified, but the 6D would be the only one in my price range, and I've noticed that it sacrifices some features, and I'd only have one lens compatible with it (50mm). Any advice? From CameraRec Toby or anyone else?
Another good video, thanks. I have one question that you may be able to answer. I know I cannot use an EF-S lens on a full frame camera because of the physical difference, but are there other differences? Since an EF-S lens is designed for a crop-sensor camera do I still have to multiply by 1.6 or is my EF-S 15-85 actually 15-85 ? I have searched but never found a solid answer. Love your videos and look forward to the Friday mish-mash.
Hi Larry - it's funny but all lenses are marked with the non crop value. So even if you are looking at the 18-55 EF-S lens it still needs to be multiplied by 1.6x Thanks for the compliments!
Hi Toby....this video was very good....but I was little bit confused on choosing walk around lense for my T3i. I have considered the sigma 17-50 mm f2.8 lense and sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4. Is there any possibility to comment on both lense and which one to buy with your perspective. I was leaning more on 17-50 as it has constant aperture and some reviews told it is more sharp and crisp. Also kindly comment on build quality of sigma lenses with comparing with canon lense. As my handling will be bit of average and I expect to be bit robust.
Great videos. I have quick question, I have a t5i and was looking at getting a 70-200mm f/2.8 by sigma. This lens says it is "optimized for full frame Canon DSLRs". Will this lens work on my camera or will there be any effect in image quality? Thanks
Hi. I am using Canon 60D with kit lens 18-200mm past 10months. Now I want to take my photography to next level. I am more interested in macro photography and landscape photography. Could you recommend me a good lens for both. Budget is not a problem and yet please do recommend from lowest to highest. Thank you Dr. Raj
Hello Toby, I found this video of yours quite useful. I am planning on upgrading my photography levels. I have the Canon T3i and my first lens after the kit is 50 1.8, which kind of kicked in my photographic intrigue. Im in love with fast prime lenses. Which lens do you suggest me buying now. Im looking at 85 1.8 and 35 2 from Canon or should i go for the sigma 18-35 1.8. Im also planning to use this new lens of mine for my brothers wedding for my own collection. Id appreciate you advice. Thanks.
Hi Toby, Im a big fan of your youtube channel, Im kicking off an idea to buy an EOS 70D with 18-135mm plus 50mm f1.8 prime lense.my question is do I have a advantage of having both of these lenses together? Is there any techniques that we cannot do in 18-135mm lense and 50mm can do? If so i can i skip the 50mm lense or do I need to buy 50mm f/1.8 for good bokeh effect? Thanks and good day
Since you didn't necessarily touch on wide lenses, What do you think about the 10-18mm lens? It's the most affordable, has an image stabilizer, and is pretty sharp from what I've researched. I also have a Canon 70d. I'd use it for real estate photography and just some nice wide angled video.
Hi. I have two cameras:the 70D and the 450D (both Canon). with the newer 70D I bought the EFS 18-55mm 3.5-5.6 IS STM kit lens and the 50mm f1.8.II With the 450D the kit lens was the EF28-80mm f3.5-5.6. I also got an Old Sigma 170-500mm f5.6 which is heavy but ok. My 70D is my main camera and I am starting to take more studio style portraits now. I would love to get the 70-200 f2.8 or f4, but price tags are still a little high for me. Should my next lens be something like the 55-250mm? And if so EF, or EF-s? Thanks for great videos BTW.
Hey Toby, I've had my 70d for a couple weeks now, thought I'd be using it mainly for videography work, but I've been getting more and more into photography as well, shooting landscapes and macro stuff mostly. I found your videos to be very informative and bought the Tamron 28-75 2.8 on your recommendation... Unfortunately, there were some errors in communication between the lens and the camera in video mode, but due to it being a gray market lens (unbeknownst to me when I purchased it from amazon) tamron will not repair it... So I'm in the process of returning it. It seemed like a nice lens, but seems more like just a "buy this if you can't afford the canon" type of lens.... Everyone I have talked to says it is better to just shell out the big bucks and get one or two super quality lenses rather than just spending half that amount on a PRETTY good lens... Over and again, lusting after the high end but being to cheap to make the leap... At the moment, I mostly shoot with a 50mm 1.8... Which I love, but it's tough to have on the camera all the time, especially when I'm looking for a wider shot in tight spaces... I do have access to all sorts of older 18-55 and 55-250 kit lenses... I've had to resort to using them with the lens trouble I've been having. I've also shot extensively with an 18-135 usm lens on a 7d that I quite liked... But long story short of it, I'm thinking that L quality glass Is the way to go... Eventually I'll get the 70-200 f/4, but I need something much wider obviously first for filmmaking before I worry too much about the telephoto... I already plan on purchasing the 40mm 2.8 because it looks sweet (plus it's cheap) but I am basically after the absolute best walk around lens I can put on my 70D... I'm leaning toward canon's 24-105 f/4L... What do you think? I'm willing to spend money to get the best glass I can... (Though not crazy money of course... Like around 1,000 or less probably). I don't think I wanna try tamron again... Or if I do I'll certainly have to Be more careful... I would also like to stick with EF lenses so I'm not limited if I ever decide to go full frame someday... Please help! Love your vids by the way, very helpful.
Hi Parker - sorry to hear you had troubles with the Tamron. I know a handful of videographers that love this lens - it really isn't necessary to always spend the big bucks but it can help to avoid these sorts of things. I originally bought the pricey Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 IS and had loads of lens errors with that lens too. So The Canon 24-105 is very good, the current march rebates - if you are in the US make the 24 - 70 f/4 IS an excellent buy docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AivpkCmcHcoTdDdMWk9kampFR3J3amFVQlhQdGJmeGc&usp=drive_web Happy to chat more.
Hi Toby, i am interested in a great lens to take wedding, family, animal portraits as well as scenery. I have the efs 18-135 mm. What would you recommend. I'm a beginner.
´´it doesn't zoom........you zoom with your feet´´ ....quote of the year
I thought this was hilarious
It is very clear, and many photographers giving advice to the less experienced will tell you the same for prime lenses "you will zoom in and out with your feet" as you get close of far from your subject.
The first lens I bought was a Canon 50mm 1.8. The "Nifty Fifty" or "Plastic "Fantastic". I paid something like $135 with tax on sale around Christmas. Lens blew me away. Bokeh!!!!! (look it up) Plus it helped me learn and play around with various setting and got me more comfortable with manual mode. You can probably get a used one anywhere from $65-$90 CDN. honestly, for the price of that lens, there is NO better value. Primes will open up another aspect of photography for you. Canon 50mm 1.8 MK II or Canon 50mm 1.8 STM. I have upgraded to the STM, but both are all killer and no filler!
I went with the 50 1.4 for my first lens. I feel it was worth the extra cash. The build quality is great and I love the wider aperture. That said, I'm sure I would have been super happy with a nifty 50. I plan on hanging on to this 1.4 for quite some time!
I had the 1.8 II and burrowed the 1.4
While the autofocus is better on the 1.4 it can't reach the accuracy of the new 1.8 stm. This stm autofocus nails it 95% of the time and it's cheaper and lighter.
But won't it be tighter on a crop sensor?
Is Sigma 17-50 is really sharp for event, birthday etc
If throwing the budget out the window, may I recommend the Canon 17-55 constant f/2.8. This lens is fabulous. The only caveat to this lens is that it is just an EF-S and does not wear the badge of a red ring. Otherwise, it is one of the fabulous choice to go for APS-C sensor DSLR.
Cheers.
I think if someone is buying the 70D and has the money get the 18-135mm STM lens. It's a good walking around lens for video and stills. It's seams to be sharp to. Good video Toby.
I agree- and every time I go out traveling/vacationing I really appreciate the light weight and convenient range of the 18-135STM.
yes its a good lens on good thing and bad at the same time I guess is that its Sooo quiet.
why is it bad..
Its not really I know the beep tells you when your in focus but it took me some time to believe it with out the R2D2 noise.
And quiet is not the word DEAD silence.
even with my ear right up next to it. I can barely tell when its moving
and I have found the grinding of my other lenses really annoying now.
i just shot with it last night shooting a concert for a job. i found it very soft overall in a low light environment. it works great in bright daylight but in dark siturations, not so much.
f5.6 @ 1/250 second at 800 iso. disappointed :(
Hello Toby! About a year ago you recommended the Sigma 17-50mm lens that I now own and LOVE! I have a newborn and have been doing quite a few portraits using my 50mm 1.4. I've started contemplating at 85mm lens. Namely the 1.8. I would love to hear your thoughts.
Skip to 4:00... you’re welcome
thanx
Rockstar.
Better than the 18-35mm sigma?
Okay few cooky questions. First off I had a 60D with the kit 18-55mm and 55-250mm. I sold that on eBay and recently purchased a 70D. Other lenses I purchased as of recently include;
- EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
- EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM
- EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
- EF 50mm f/1.8 STM
I do have a tripod, monopod, external flash and possibly considering some SPL housing being that I live at the beach. Currently I have about $800 perhaps $1k to spend on another piece of glass. I have been told not to spend it unless I know what I need but this was money I put away for this purpose and if I don't use it now, its gone. Ideally I would get something else to help round out my collection to give me the most versatility possible. I am looking for any input. In addition, aside from my lens budget, does anyone feel the extra $300 is worth it to upgrade to the 80D? I can still swap my 70D out for a few more days. I just don't know the extra focal points makes any difference to me.
I was planning to get the canon 70D with the kit lenses 18-55 mm STM and the 55-250 mm STM, is it a good choice?
YES, IT IS
just pulled the trigger for the 24 105L, white box from full frame kit, paired it with my gripped 650D... couldn't be happier... tried at the shop the 18 135 stm and sigma 17 50 2.8, which feels its not much a substantial upgrade from crop kit lens... and yes, I don't miss the 18 23 range...
I'm surprised you recommended the 40mm over the 24mm, the 24mm on crop sensors becomes almost a 35mm which is a great focal length for street photography and it's also tiny and really cheap.
I agree as I own the 24 too. But I think it may not have been out when this video was made.
Nathan Lewis The 40mm is Sharper...
That may be true Nathan but I feel like a 24mm (35mm in this case) is a much more versatile focal length. You can do somewhat wide angle photography, while still being able to get decent reach with your lens. Also, the 24mm 2.8 is so damn cute on a camera body haha
The 24mm f2.8 "pancake" wasn't out when this video was released. It is much better though!
I have the kit lens 18mm-55mm, and eventually got both the 24mm and 40mm(cheap). The 18mm barely gets out of my bag now. The pancake lenses are far better. I've done the test on the 18mm-55mm at 24mm and then 40mm, and then compare the photos with pancakes. In low light, the kit lens is merely murky and dark while the pancakes are sharp and clear.. The f2.8 of the two pancakes is wonderful. I recently rented a t7i with the new Digic7 processor, and the pancakes produced some incredible photos at Yosemite. Pancakes allow for using a lot smaller camera bag too. Street photos with the 40mm is my favorite, and the 24mm is good too.
I got the 70D with the 18-200 lense, it was a bit of a deal, though nothing to scream about. I did a quick week or so of reading on it and it seemed to be given great reviews and such where-ever I looked. But it's obviously not mentioned her, would you say it's a decent "all round" lense, disbarring it's price range.
As you said the primes are better for more in-door shots, but my focus will be scenery, action shots of my dogs and other animals as well as random shooting, night exposure shots while traveling to Japan over the next year.
If there is a cheap "alternate" lense you would recommend for something that the 18-200 just plain isn't suited for, that might give me overall a better experience with any one of these things, I might consider getting that as well, whether soon or later down the line.
That said, i'm very beginner in photography. It's a dabbling interest and thus why I haven't had a decent DSLR like the 70D until... well now.
Cheers.
I have a Canon 70d and I am looking for the best wide angle lens for it. What are your recommendations?
+harrrMONICA Canon 10-18 is the cheap and easy solution but watch th-cam.com/video/Lj-NIN4QhgU/w-d-xo.html
Thanks!!
Actually, I have another question. Could you use a full-frame ultra wide-angle lens on a APS-C body?
+harrrMONICA Sigma 18-35mm constant f/1.8 :)
i would suggest the sigma 18-35mm 1.8 art lens.
Thanks for the Video.
I recently got the 70D and I got these three lenses, and my next purchases (later down the track).
18-135 STM Kit - Awesome default lens it really is. Covers most family situations beautifully and the STM video with 70d is magic.
50 1.8 II - This I call my training lens. I have this lens to teach me photography, I have to move and compose my shots with care, and I get to play with DOF and light a lot more. It's also dirt cheap.
Sigma 18-250mm Macro - This is my Travel lens. It's a nice telephoto range, and it works quite well for covering your range on the run. I'd usually have the 50mm in the pocket for low-light indoor though.
So that is where I've started, and I'm super happy with the 3 starters.
Where I go next is...
Canon 40mm STM - it might be similar to the 50mm, but it's purpose is for lower light video and super light party lens. (it's also super cheap, so happy to have both).
Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 - Instead of buying wider primes, I'll save up for this puppy. I know I won't be disappointed.
Canon 100mm Macro 2.8 ( would love the IS L version but $$$ ) - A great lens for macro, but also wonderful for higher end portraits.
Tokina 11-16 ATX Pro AF - ( I may get this guy if I really want some nice wide landscape or architecture photos, but it's a maybe. )
And after that I think the wife will cut my credit card, so doubtful if I'll make it to the L lenses that I'm also dreaming of. So method to my madness?
G.
You have laid out several great options there and I'd like to hear more about what you like to photograph and the direction you want to go. I could then make a more inteligent recommendation - that said, all of those lenses on your list are either lenses I own or want to - so that's a good sign :)
I'm interested in exploring most types of photography. Especially Portrait, Landscape, Wildlife, and Macro, not so much Sport or Event Photography. I've just ordered a YN-568EXii with some 622Cs for offcam strobist stuff as well. Your video's have been incredibly useful Toby, so a big thanks for all your work mate.
Glenn Brown You do want to do it all :) Or almost all. You have to narrow it down before I can make a recommendation - The macro is quite different than anything else you currently own. - longer focal length with f/2.8.
Ha, I do indeed!! I was looking at the Canon 100mm 2.8 (not sure if IS L version is worth the stretch) or Tokina 100mm or maybe longer. Macro is a less pressing need at this stage so I can hold off a bit. Thanks again CameraRec Toby
BxSQUIRREL I couldn't reply to your comment - so linking instead - Any full frame lens will work just fine on a crop sensor- you do have to multiply by 1.6 to get what will be the true field of view - so it acts like a 112mm to 320mm but it will be excellent and the common complaint about that Sigma is soft corner - with a crop sensor those will be a non-issue.
Hello,i bought a 70d few days ago,but i by a 18-200mm efs,do i do the wrong choice? I was in doubt for a 18-135 stm or this one..Did i do wrong choice? Thanks..
R.D. P. I personally am not a fan of the do-it-all lenses, the lenses that cover 18-200 or more. They are certainly convenient but in my opinion you make sacrifices in image quality and convenience. The 18-135 range is about as high as I think someone should go. Do you want to do video? The STM of the 18-135 means video will be smooth and silent while autofocusing. with the 18-200 you will hear the lens as it autofocuses.
R.D. P. 18-135 stm and 24-105 L red ring lenses and u will not go wrong
Ali Polaris I owned the 7D for over a year! Fantastic camera at the time but with the features of the 70D and the dual pixel AF I don't see any reason to go with 7D over the 70D for video work.
Ali Polaris get 70D like i said 3 lens u need for photos n video
18-135stm lens a 24-105 L red ring lens and 55-250 stm lens and your never go wrong and 32 gig sandisk class 10 sd card n extra insurance
I have the Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS and it's an outstanding lens. Very sharp, IS allows ridiculously slow handholds in low light and it focuses extremely fast.
canon 70D
18-135 lens stm ??
Just purchased the Canon 80D and 70-200mm f/4 IS USM, then learned about crop factor and how it affects aperture. This combo still provides fantastic shots even with crop factor bringing your f/4 down to an f/6.4? Glad you recommended that lens. Wasn’t sure what to get for a trip to Iceland.
Don't stress about crop factor and aperture - just get out and shoot - Iceland is Awesome!! Enjoy!
Is that Murphy from RoboCop?
lmao....that serious fucked up the video
lmaoooo hahahahaha good one ..lol
hahahahhaahha OMFG!!! HAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA
Tom Petty?
Damn , hahahaha good one ☝🏽 btw great video !!
I'd honestly recommend EF 85 f1.8 - awesome portrait lens for some tele action and 35 f2 (or 28 f1.8) for some wider shots. That's a budget solution, on my opinion probably the best. I personally use 85 f1.8 and Sigma 35 f1.4 with my Canon 60D and love every second of it...
sigma 17-50 os?
dont think there is a sigma 18-50 os with constant 2.8
+Captain Slow www.amazon.es/Sigma-17-50mm-f2-8-HSM-estabilizador/dp/B003A6NU3U/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1450600512&sr=8-1&keywords=sigma+17-50
Mohammed Moumene that’s for Nikon though
Thanks for the tip. I bought a used 80D for pretty cheap and dumped the rest of the available funds on a Canon 17-55mm 2.8, sigma 18-35mm 1.8, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 10-22mm wide angle lens, and a canon 70-200mm 2.8 IS II. I'm good on lenses for now. Maybe get a macro lens next when I have money again.
"you zoom with your feet"
Hi !! i just wonder about a few questions that Right now i got a Sigma 50mm f 1.4 art series. First question is what can i do with the lense (the most suitable purpose of using the len) Second is what is the best body i should get !
I want my 70d to look like black magic or red footage
use final cut pro and add a red or black layer in top of the video thats it! good luck bro!
Graphicsc how do you find the red or black layer on fcpx
Have the 70D with a 18-55, and a 70-200mm f/2.8 IS, purchased it 2 weeks ago. ❤🙃
The picture frames in the background are not even. They are very distracting to me.
I have been following your advice on lenses with amazing results! I bought the sigma 50mm 1.4 for my Canon t5i and tried it out at my brothers wedding. He had low, romantic lighting for the reception and with this amazing lens I was able to capture the warmth of the existing lighting without requiring additional light sources. The shallow depth of field created phenomenal results in each shot. I kept getting the same comments from everyone.. "Wow that is an amazing camera!"
My next lenses will be the sigma 18-35. Thank you!
Ted Munford Awesome to hear. We love our Sigmas, they did just announce a 24mm f/1.4 too - very excited for that, so much cheaper than the Canon version. photorec.tv/2015/02/sigma-24mm-f1-4-art-series-announced/
I am considering the Tamron 28-75 for my full frame. For my 30D (crop) I had the Tamron 17-50 for more versatility of wide angles.
I have recently purchased the 70d and it has been a serious upgrade from my Rebel xTi. I did get the 18-135mm kit lens and also got the Sigma 10-20mm lens. I really should have watched your video sooner because I have already purchased the 24-105 f/4 lens! I wanted a little better walk around lens....my main focus is getting used to a lens before traveling in Europe. I'm figuring I will need a lens that can handle low light situations for museums, churches, etc. I know most do not allow flash photography. I'm not too keen on bringing a lot of lenses with me due to weight restrictions for carryon luggage. I also have a 50mm f1.8, which is super light.....will the 24-105 lens be a safe bet? I can imagine needing a zoom bigger than that (although I do have an older Canon 70-300mm lens, but wasn't planning on bringing it). I wish I had purchased the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 but was afraid it didn't have a large enough zoom for my needs while traveling in Europe. What are your thoughts?
After several trips last year, I realized what limitations I'm dealing with on my t5i with the kit lenses. If you give the kit lenses enough light the pictures can be stunningly clear, but when the sun starts dimming, so does the quality of the shot. Video is different, the quality there is excellent even at night for say a concert.
I eventually picked up 40mm & 24mm STM lenses for less than $300 for both. These two lenses beat the pants off the kit lenses for gobbling up light, and just OK for video as well. 40mm is also a nice street lens at night. Both of these pancake lenses really worked well in Yosemite, which goes in and out of direct sunlight quite often. Take these pancakes and the kits and take comparison shots in a low light room, and the kit lens pics will be darker and muddier.
Very new to DSLR (Canon 70D Kit) so everything still sounds like French to me but I must say; there is no advice for your Instructor ability. Pretty clean and clear. Awesome!
Thanks Frankie! I am slowly working on a 70D guide so stay tuned.
I'm planning to buy 70D with 18mm-135mm lenses . I'm a bigginer. Interesting to watch your video.
Thanks and regards,
Indika
hello... can you please recommend me a lens for canon 70d for making sharp, focused and clear videos.. ?
Mehndiartist_Hira i would suggest the Sigma 10-20mm for a budget, wide angle lens that does excellent video. Also, the Rokinon 14mm lens which is amazingly sharp except there is no autofocus or image stabilization.
Sharp images are not from cannon Sony is the best camera have sharp images
I just bought a 60D and knew I wanted a zoom lens to begin with. I liked that it came with the 18-135mm and I picked the 50-250mm as a second lens. I feel vindicated by your recommendations. I love both lenses. I had been borrowing a camera with a 17-55mm and a 70-300mm. They worked great, but I felt that something was missing with the spread between the 55 and 70mm.
I just bought the 70D today. Sams Club had a Sams only bundle that included the 18-55 STM kit lens and the 55-250 STM zoom lens, a 32 gig card and a 2nd battery....all for $1400. Im really happy that I got the 250 STM zoom in my bundle. This video really solidified my decision. Thanks.
Image stabilization (especially if the lens has 2 or 3 mode of image stabilization) can help with moving subjects if you are panning...
Thanks for the video. I have a Canon 7D (crop sensor) and have a 50mm 1.4 prime.
I find that the 50mm quite restrictive indoors in tight situations (especially if I need to take full length photos or groups Im having to half hang out of a window)
I am looking at a getting a zoom. I photograph families, newborns as well as headshots. I know I will be ok with my current 50mm for the headshots and newborns but a zoom would be great for the family shots especially if I do indoor ones and need to do full length group shots. I have heard that the 18-35mm 1.8 would be a good investment but I would love your imput too,thanks
So I'm back for the second time haha. Now I am looking into prime lenses. and you pretty much summed me up in this video.
My question is about the 50mm f/1.8 STM, the new and improved 50mm prime lens. I really want to get that shallow depth of field, bowkeh, etc for portraits.
However, that is an EF lens correct. So on my 70d cropped sensor it will be around 80mm? I feel that, that is a bit too close. I don't think it would be right to have to back up so far to get the shot. What do you think? I can't find any other cheap alternatives with such a nice aperture.
Wish I would have seen this before I went out and upgraded to the 70D body only. I regret so much in not getting the savings for the kit lens and having the added features many other kit lenses do not offer! Great video Toby!
very good video, I use this 3 lenses: 18-55 stm, 70-200 f4, 24-105 L F4 and currently looking to buy either 10-18 stm, or 55-250 stm
Very nice video Toby!
I do quite a little bit of video shooting in low light, but most of it is handheld. what would be a better choice considering this, the 18-35 or the sigma 17-50? I need the bigger aperture, but IS is kind of must have when shooting handheld without any rigs.
Thanks for your great help as always and keep them coming!
Hello I just purchased a canon Eos 70d and am wondering what sort of lense would be good to go to a concert with (needs good zoom) thanks 😃
very helpful videos. thanks. I need a camera with video for doing videos for a web sight. I'm just wondering if the 18-135 stm lens will do what I need it to do. I'm also new to all of this, but am going to dive in and learn as much as possible.
Just curious, why do you prefer the f/4 over the f/2.8 in the 70-200mm? Both have an amazing reputation, but I would think the f/2.8 would be more versatile.
I would like to start of with saying thank you for the nice videos you make Toby. I have a question regarding Canon 70D, we want to use it for making videos On TH-cam, Indoors and outdoors, we have choosen the 70D because of the incredible autofokus. The camera will be on a tripod most of the time but we would like to have the option to film without a tripod as well. Because we love to travel and save the memories. What kind of Lens do you recommend for the task? I have thought about a wide lens because of the depth of field and wide angle.
Yes Toby, the 50mm 1.4 is an excellent lens, that is a steal at its price! I agree with your opinion and assessment of ultra wide angle lens. Don't want them don't need them.
I need some help Toby with finding the most appropriate lenses for my Canond 70D. Currently, I am using the Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS in an attempt to have a one-does-all lens, but have noticed it struggling in poor light, and not being able to magnify at far distances such as stages at an auditorium, or on the local soccer field. I am tempted by the Sigma 35mm 1.4 as the go to lens at walking distances, and maybe supplementing it with a telephoto lens (which I have no clue what length is good for the examples listed above).
I am tempted to upgrade to a full frame camera to boost low light.
Also, I am looking into flashes as I have a friend's birthday party coming up later this month. I have avoided flashes in an attempt to have more natural photos (and I normally shoot in the dad), but ideally it would be good to have something on the smaller side, have a rechargeable internal battery, and have a swivel/twist head.
Finally, audio microphones! I have a RODE Stereo Video Mic PRO, but hoping there is something smaller, and doesn't required replaceable batteries.
A lot to ask, so I'm fine with any insight you can shed.
Hi Toby- I purchased the Canon 70D almost 2 years ago and have been overall happy with it with the exception of indoor shots. I have the 18-55 kit lens and also a canon 50mm 1.8. I mainly use my kit lens for everyday stuff (indoors) and use my 50mm for outdoor portraits. I am wanting to upgrade my lenses for these reasons: one, I want a lens that does well in low light, indoors and gives nice sharp pictures for everyday stuff. Two, I need a better lens for my outdoor portraits (I take mostly families and children) as the 50mm prime drives me crazy! It gives great bokeh, but I hate the fact that it can not zoom and I am constantly stepping back and forth. I am wanting a lens that has some zooming capabilities but also gives a nice sharp picture and pretty bokeh. Also, another factor for me is that i do depend on auto focus when i photograph people. I have tried using manual focus and never seem to get it right. What would you recommend for someone like me? I am not a pro but do want my photos to reflect that of a pro photographer. Also, the budget is tight....suggestions? Thank you!!!!
Thank you Toby.. I have purchased the Sigma 18-35 F/1.8 lens.. It is really a very sharp lens...
This video really helped, I'm buying a camera today and was researching this exact question
I know that usually when thinking of upgrading, the lens is the way to go instead of upgrading the body. I have a canon t3 (not t3i, just the regular t3), and it does not compare in picture quality or features to any of my friends t3i and t5i using the same kit lens. I have been trying to decide on what to upgrade, torn between replacing the body with a 70d or 7d, or replacing the kit lens with the tamron 28-75mm or the canon 24-105mm L. Seeing as my camera falls short in so many categories, would a high-quality lens improve my photos more than a new body would?
hi dear, I am looking forward to purchase a Canon 70D. I am just a beginner and quite impressed by seeing review of canon 70D. Is it worth to buy with 18-55 mm IS II?
Great video as always, Toby! I think I've made up my mind for which lens to buy next (the 55-250 STM). Thanks!
***** Yeah, will do. My budget is very tight, so unless Sigma come up with another amazing bang-for-buck lens with a similar focal range, I'll just stick to this one.
***** $200 when bought as the bundled deal! What do you want? lens is longer but lightweight -plastic mount is not an issue in this case. To much is made of that on the web. Suggestions for a better zoom in that price range?
CameraRec Toby the Tamron 70-300 VC is a great lens as well, and price-wise is between the 55-250 and that 70-200/4L you showed, and most reviews place the Tam 70-300VC image quality at very close to the 70-200/4L lens.
Thank you very much for all of your video's. They have been extremely helpful in deciding what camera to buy and lenses.
Hey Toby,
I think that another great lens to consider is the Canon EF-S 15-85.
it is a great lens, and even though it's not quite cheap it has a great value for money.
It is very sharp, that extra 3mm on the wide side are very helpful (more than I could have imagined before I owned it) and it has lots of L lens qualities, as well as good "walk-around" range and USM motor with full time autofocus.
If you're not planning on going full-frame in the next few years - this lens worth a look.
It is a good lens - I agree. thanks!
Great video as always. I have a 70d and I'm looking for a prime lens, the 50mm looks like a very good lens for the money. Will go down to my local camera store and test one out.
Hi Toby, thank you for sharing your thoughts on these lenses, but i have a particular question about which prime to buy. I already have a 70D with the 18-135 kit lens, but I'm searching for a prime lens. I'm not really the most professional photographer in the world, but when i'm on a trip with my family or friends, I'm always the man behind the camera. A lot of my pictures are portraits of my friends and landscapes/street photos. I really hope you can give me a good suggestion about which lens to buy. Thanks
thanks a lot. Thank you. Should I buy a 14 mm or 8 mm for interior? i have 70D
+Becon Studio 8mm will be fisheye lens, dont recommend that anything but artistic photography
ok tnaks a lot .. great channel :)
what crop lense would you recommend for wedding and portrait photography? I use a Canon 70D and have been doing a lot of photo shoots and a few weddings lately. I also do a bit of video as well.
Hi, I've been contemplating of getting Sigma 17-70mm 2.8/4 Macro or the Sigma 17-50mm f2.5 lens... What's your suggestion? Which lens should I be getting for my DSLR... I've tried both, and the result's still a little inconclusive... which lens would be a "better" upgrade from the kit lens that comes w/ my Canon DSLR (T5i), thanks a lot!
i have been using the 50 mm f/1.8 and 40mm f/2.8 and my kit lens but i have made a big investment i purchased a Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 i have just got it what type of shots should i take to practice and learn the characteristics of the lens thanks for your videos
+Mirza Ahmed oh I'm using a t4i which is a fantastic camera
How is this for a basic starter system and would you recommend some changes? Thanks.
Canon EOS 70D with 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 STM Lens
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 Lens
Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM Lens
I don"t know if anyone already said this. But full frame lenses on crop sensor have different fstop and focal length. Fe the 50mm f/1.8 full frame lens will become 80mm f/2.9 on a crop sensor.
thank you for an in depth insight on the lenses for crop sensor Canon cameras
Really enjoy the info…I'm interested in getting an everyday lens and I'm leaning towards the canon 85mm f1.8. I'm need to the dslr world and I respect your opinion so what are your thoughts? I'm also very interested in the sigma 18-35 f1.8.Thanks in advance for your help.
Hey Toby, had a few questions. So I was planning on buying a canon 70d, but wasn't going to get it new (eBay) and the body. I'm pretty sure I'm gonna get an 18-135 stm, a 70-300 (both canon), but on the tamron 28-75. I heard that the 28-75 was very loud when af is this true? Also is it worth it to get the 50-250 stm vs. the 70-300? Thanks keep up the work
I have a very common question that should i invest on body or lens, i want camera more for videos and little bit of photography, or may i go for NIKON D7100.
Hi. Thanks for the recommendations. It's all nicely done. I recently took a course in photography, and I'm all set to take great photos - hopefully! Problem is, I find the 18-135mm lens on my Canon 70D lacking in quality, especially with indoor shots. Would you recommend investing in a Tamron 28-75 F/2.8, a Canon EF 50mm F/1.4 or a Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4.5 -6 IS STM? I am mainly interested in photographing my kid, and taking great shots whilst traveling, since we go on vacations often.
I'd really appreciate some guidance.
Been using the 70D with 18-135 for years. Looking to get better sharpness and better colour with a better lens. I shoot video primarily. What do you recommend? I'd like to start at around 18, but don't need huge zoom. I do need lens that is quiet and fast enough on zoom. The 50 1.2 does a great job, but zoom is loud and slow.
hi, i am wondering which lense to get. my budget is about $1000 for a starter bundle. but am willling to do my own bundle within reason. I love taking family pics with landscape showing in the background, and also landscape photos, and wildlife. these are my main interest to start with. Oh also, the night sky. I will be purchasing the canon t6s. thanks
Hi Toby,
Would these recommendations still be valid for the 7D mark ii? If not, any alterations that you would recommend?
Thanks very much
Mike
Thank you for the video,,, I have canon 70D and got a 50mm lens from canon with f1.4 and USM drive. I love taking photos for landscape. Do you think I should have another 24 mm lens, or better to get the 18 to 35 mm one from sigma you have spoken about in your video ?
Nice! I have decided that I would buy a 60D plus a 70-200 F4 L, since I already have the 50mm 1.8 (yeah, the nifty fifty), but Im bit confused which wider lens I will buy. That Tamron looks really nice and its not that expensive. Do you recommend to buy an used Tamron?
Very informative and refreshing to not have to click on ads. Thanks for posting!
recommendation for concert photography: what lens should I used for sharp photos and also that will have enough zoom to get close into the stage? (sorry about my English) ?
Thanks.
quick question! i just bought the cannon 70d to shoot short films, but the quality is grainy in dem light & sometimes in regular light. which lens would you recommend that will give me that clear sharp look?
I cover this in here Photo Mish Mash Podcast -Episode #1!! - Reader Questions- Picture Styles, Low Light Quality and a prime lens is what you want. Recommended Canon Prime Lenses
I think it would be a great idea comparing the video quality of the 70d vs. both generations of 5d mark 2 and 3. Can you also use the same cheaper lenses on the cameras? Like the 18-135 lens on both cameras. And please compare side by side.
FYI - 18-135 STM is an EF-S lens, only fits on APS-C cameras like 70D, T5i(700D) etc. Won't fit/mount on full frame camera. I probably will test with a nice prime lens.
Hello, I have a canon t6. Right now I mostly use a 50mm f1.8 and the kit lens 18-55mm. I do automotive photography. What lens could I use that would have a very wide range for close ups detailed pictures and far away pictures?
Hi Toby, I've been doing a lot of street photography lately, and I find my current 50mm f1.8 + 70D combo way too tight for my liking. I'm looking to get closer to my subjects (people doing stuff or walking about), and nice bokeh to go along. I've kinda settled on Tokina 11-16 f2.8, but can you perhaps recommend me an alternative, faster wide-angle prime lens around the same price range as the Tokina?
Hey. Awesome video! I'm going to rent the t5i to see if that is the camera I want to upgrade to for my tech videos. What lens would you recommend me renting it with if I shot smartphones reviews and other tech related content? Thanks.
NothingButTech88 40mm f/2.8 STM
Thank you can you send me a link to the best one? Thank you.
NothingButTech88 www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/870179-REG/Canon_40mm_f_2_8_EF_Pancake.html?BI=4773&KBID=5287
Hi thank you. I noticed that this is a prime lens can you recommend a zoom lens?
ok, I just need to get something cleared up and I do hope you can assist. I am looking to purchase a 70D and get a 24-105 lens. I know I must multiply by 1.6 to get the field of view..but what I want to know if I also have to multiply the f stop as well or will it remain at f4 still?
thanks for ur awesome tutorials mate...just a qn... is the 18-55 IS II same as 18-55 IS STM ?
Hello, thanks for the recommendations.
I own a Canon 7D. I've been shooting for a year now with a EF-S 18-200mm, EF 50mm f1.8 and a Sigma 8-16mm. I'm happy with the results but miss faster lenses for low light situations. I'm thinking to go with the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 and Sigma DC 50-150mm f2.8 + a 2x teleconverter. What do you think? Thanks.
Tody, thanks for the great videos! Really helps when your new in the field and looking for answers. I am just entering the Real Estate field and using the T5i. What is the best wide angle lens to use? Obviously I want to get the most I can in every shot and want the highest quality as well.
What should be my first prime lens for a canon SL2 crop sensor camera?
I’ll be using the camera to record TH-cam videos in my room to promote my small business products!
I am debating whether to get a Canon 6d or 70d, I've watched your comparison video, however I plan to do a lot of run and gun shooting in mostly low-light situations and on a low budget. The full-frame sensor on the 6d along with the price is very attractive and also the full-frame lenses and not having to deal with the crop factor of the 70d is attractive. However, because I plan on doing run and gun shooting, the AF system of the 70d also caught my eye, since the 6d has no AF in video mode at all. Back to lenses, I am looking for a lense that is good for filming that includes IS and a low aperture from about f/2.8- f/1.4 because I will not have time to set up a tripod or have the money for a shoulder rig or steadycam and I plan on having lots of bokeh in my film. I've been going crazy on choosing between the two cameras and lens options, Please Help!
I have a Canon T3 (1100D), and am trying to shoot a lot of night photography. I also shoot in otherwise a lot of low light situations, and the 1100D is just noisy. I'm about to upgrade either with lenses or the body itself. I have the 50 F1.8, 55-250 mk ii (non STM), and the 18-55 kit mk ii (also not STM). Most of what I come across says to upgrade your lenses before the body, but I was thinking of jumping to the 7D mk ii when it comes out. I think the general rule is to upgrade lenses, but going from a T3 to a 7D mk ii is a pretty big upgrade for the body. Do you think that upgrade would still be less of an 'upgrade' than getting a better lens or two? Also, I understand for low light, that an upgrade to full frame would probably be even more justified, but the 6D would be the only one in my price range, and I've noticed that it sacrifices some features, and I'd only have one lens compatible with it (50mm).
Any advice? From CameraRec Toby or anyone else?
High Toby. What is you take on using the 100mm 2.8 L IS for portraits. I am currently using a 7D.
Another good video, thanks. I have one question that you may be able to answer. I know I cannot use an EF-S lens on a full frame camera because of the physical difference, but are there other differences? Since an EF-S lens is designed for a crop-sensor camera do I still have to multiply by 1.6 or is my EF-S 15-85 actually 15-85 ? I have searched but never found a solid answer. Love your videos and look forward to the Friday mish-mash.
Hi Larry - it's funny but all lenses are marked with the non crop value. So even if you are looking at the 18-55 EF-S lens it still needs to be multiplied by 1.6x Thanks for the compliments!
Hi Toby....this video was very good....but I was little bit confused on choosing walk around lense for my T3i. I have considered the sigma 17-50 mm f2.8 lense and sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4. Is there any possibility to comment on both lense and which one to buy with your perspective. I was leaning more on 17-50 as it has constant aperture and some reviews told it is more sharp and crisp. Also kindly comment on build quality of sigma lenses with comparing with canon lense. As my handling will be bit of average and I expect to be bit robust.
Great videos. I have quick question, I have a t5i and was looking at getting a 70-200mm f/2.8 by sigma. This lens says it is "optimized for full frame Canon DSLRs". Will this lens work on my camera or will there be any effect in image quality? Thanks
Hi.
I am using Canon 60D with kit lens 18-200mm past 10months. Now I want to take my photography to next level. I am more interested in macro photography and landscape photography. Could you recommend me a good lens for both. Budget is not a problem and yet please do recommend from lowest to highest.
Thank you
Dr. Raj
Hello Toby, I found this video of yours quite useful. I am planning on upgrading my photography levels. I have the Canon T3i and my first lens after the kit is 50 1.8, which kind of kicked in my photographic intrigue. Im in love with fast prime lenses. Which lens do you suggest me buying now. Im looking at 85 1.8 and 35 2 from Canon or should i go for the sigma 18-35 1.8. Im also planning to use this new lens of mine for my brothers wedding for my own collection. Id appreciate you advice. Thanks.
Hi Toby,
Im a big fan of your youtube channel, Im kicking off an idea to buy an EOS 70D with 18-135mm plus 50mm f1.8 prime lense.my question is do I have a advantage of having both of these lenses together? Is there any techniques that we cannot do in 18-135mm lense and 50mm can do? If so i can i skip the 50mm lense or do I need to buy 50mm f/1.8 for good bokeh effect?
Thanks and good day
What are your thoughts on the Canon 24-105mm F4L lens for a beginner?
Since you didn't necessarily touch on wide lenses, What do you think about the 10-18mm lens? It's the most affordable, has an image stabilizer, and is pretty sharp from what I've researched. I also have a Canon 70d. I'd use it for real estate photography and just some nice wide angled video.
+Jeffrey Green This video was made before the 10-18 came out - I like it, watch this th-cam.com/video/ypARnDnnYCE/w-d-xo.html
Hi. I have two cameras:the 70D and the 450D (both Canon). with the newer 70D I bought the EFS 18-55mm 3.5-5.6 IS STM kit lens and the 50mm f1.8.II With the 450D the kit lens was the EF28-80mm f3.5-5.6. I also got an Old Sigma 170-500mm f5.6 which is heavy but ok. My 70D is my main camera and I am starting to take more studio style portraits now. I would love to get the 70-200 f2.8 or f4, but price tags are still a little high for me. Should my next lens be something like the 55-250mm? And if so EF, or EF-s? Thanks for great videos BTW.
Hey Toby,
I've had my 70d for a couple weeks now, thought I'd be using it mainly for videography work, but I've been getting more and more into photography as well, shooting landscapes and macro stuff mostly. I found your videos to be very informative and bought the Tamron 28-75 2.8 on your recommendation... Unfortunately, there were some errors in communication between the lens and the camera in video mode, but due to it being a gray market lens (unbeknownst to me when I purchased it from amazon) tamron will not repair it... So I'm in the process of returning it. It seemed like a nice lens, but seems more like just a "buy this if you can't afford the canon" type of lens.... Everyone I have talked to says it is better to just shell out the big bucks and get one or two super quality lenses rather than just spending half that amount on a PRETTY good lens... Over and again, lusting after the high end but being to cheap to make the leap... At the moment, I mostly shoot with a 50mm 1.8... Which I love, but it's tough to have on the camera all the time, especially when I'm looking for a wider shot in tight spaces... I do have access to all sorts of older 18-55 and 55-250 kit lenses... I've had to resort to using them with the lens trouble I've been having.
I've also shot extensively with an 18-135 usm lens on a 7d that I quite liked... But long story short of it, I'm thinking that L quality glass Is the way to go... Eventually I'll get the 70-200 f/4, but I need something much wider obviously first for filmmaking before I worry too much about the telephoto... I already plan on purchasing the 40mm 2.8 because it looks sweet (plus it's cheap) but I am basically after the absolute best walk around lens I can put on my 70D... I'm leaning toward canon's 24-105 f/4L... What do you think? I'm willing to spend money to get the best glass I can... (Though not crazy money of course... Like around 1,000 or less probably). I don't think I wanna try tamron again... Or if I do I'll certainly have to Be more careful... I would also like to stick with EF lenses so I'm not limited if I ever decide to go full frame someday... Please help! Love your vids by the way, very helpful.
Hi Parker - sorry to hear you had troubles with the Tamron. I know a handful of videographers that love this lens - it really isn't necessary to always spend the big bucks but it can help to avoid these sorts of things. I originally bought the pricey Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 IS and had loads of lens errors with that lens too. So The Canon 24-105 is very good, the current march rebates - if you are in the US make the 24 - 70 f/4 IS an excellent buy docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AivpkCmcHcoTdDdMWk9kampFR3J3amFVQlhQdGJmeGc&usp=drive_web Happy to chat more.
Hi Toby, i am interested in a great lens to take wedding, family, animal portraits as well as scenery. I have the efs 18-135 mm. What would you recommend. I'm a beginner.