I rode in a '99 Citroen Xantia "zan-sha" in Belgium at the time and this car was amazing! It went up paver roads in Brussels like they were asphalt. You heard the road, not felt it. Eventually I drove it, and it cornered like a VW GTI, but normally the suspension was perfect!
I owned three different Xantias, and they were all a revelation. The car had passive rear steering, so you cold really push it in the bends, but beware the squirrely handling at the limit!
My elderly grand parents had an XM Familiale Diesel in the UK they lived off road in the country to get to their house they had to drive down a rutted track that was nearly a quarter of a mile from the main road, they though it was perfect for the job I do remember that it was quite an unreliable car as it aged especially with the brakes and electrics, the car ultimately went to the Scrap yard as many big Citroens did prematurely.
It's a shame we couldn't get this car officially back in 1992. It would have probably cost in the mid-$30,000 range instead of close to $50,000 after being imported by CXA. The XM wagon would have been great to have now.
03:00 the reason why people bought a Citroën back then, the best ride quality of all cars back then the Xantia has even the best results in the Swedish elk test
XM wonderfully different. Totally an oddball rare buy in EU. Especially in UK. Don’t doubt France was at best a low seller. It’s a larger saloon. They don’t sell
I was a mechanic back then when those cars where 2 years old (Europe) My god always something broken they loved the service shop!! Most of them luckily 4 cil gas or Diesel engines. They drove nice when they did…🙃
@@FEGTTTSDH The lack of reliability only applies to the very first production year(s?). The cost cutters botched up the electronic connectors, IIRC keeping test connectors in the first production batches. They changed that weakness quickly and the first Generation (Y3) is even more rust resistant than the second (Y4) produced from 1994 onwards.
@@aviestrela they aren't, you can clearly see that they aren't as wide and that the grille is widened to make it look like it's supposed to be that way.
They're the headlights from an early 90s Pontiac Grand Prix, which are a little narrower than the original lights. There's a painted piece to fill the gap.
... poorly designed??? 🙄It's not true, have in actually a great Technology. I own 12 Hydropneumatik-Cars. 3.0 hdi C6, C5, 3x xm y4 v6, Xantia Activa v6 and 4 further Xantia, BX, GSA Pallas. I believe, I have enough Experience that to say.... 😉
apart from the ill-fated and unreliable Audi Offroad, large Citroens are the ONLY vehicles that are a relaxing drive at 110 mhp, can up their suspension in case of high water or a snowdrift, and have good fuel economy. A truly civilized and versatile car. Setright knew what he was talking about when he praised them.
In this case, American English is closer to the French pronunciation than British English... Unless I am mistaken. Same in how Americans say Citro-en, more similar to the French pronunciation.
Citroen is NOT a reliable car!! I m professional mechanic in Europe for 25 years!! No French car is reliable!! Even today! Except 1994 Renault Twingo!!🙂🤣
When I was self employed I had two Citroen Dispatch vans (98 and 02) that went way past 200K miles without a hitch. My 2015 Renault Trafic I sold with 225K a year ago and the guy still has it and uses it daily. I also had two Ford Transits that were nothing but trouble.
And how exactly is it not reliable ? Some owners had issues, some of them hadnt any, so it mostly depends on luck, same with modern German and Italian crap.
I have worked on Citroëns for 30 years and in the same time driven over a million km in XM´s. And I´m happy to say that you don´t know what you are talking about. The XM is a VERY reliable car. And no, I´m not a "Citroën only". My personal "collection" has always had both Swedish and German cars together with the French. One of my four XM´s has over 500000km on the clock and has not left me stranded once. The myth about poor reliability is only kept alive by bad mechanics that doesn´t know anything about Citroëns, and of course bad journalists like this one in motorweek. Long time since I saw such a bad review. I mean, he managed to complain about interior space in the front in the car with the same space as an S-class. Also, complaining about body-roll when Tiff Needell judged the handling on par with a Lotus. I guess it´s like when biased motorweek killed the Isuzu Trooper in the handling test (and lost in court after beeing sued). Bad journalists makes bad tests.
@@michaelheimbrand5424 Wow that is nice to hear. We had C5 Estate 1.6 HDI 1.Gen (bought new), it had few factory issues in the beginning , but after issues were resolved it ran flawlessly, sadly it was sold at 125K KM, because of financial reasons. Modern hydropneumatic suspension can last a long a time before it needs some servicing, but for comfort it is definitely worth the money.
The XM is a delightful sleek aerodynamic wedge, thank you very much! Not some boring 3-box sedan. 😉 The idea the quality is noticeably worse than other European cars is untrue IMO. Besides a little TLC is part of the charm. Same goes for the even more beautiful Alfa Romeo 164. 😊
XM wonderfully different. Totally an oddball rare buy in EU. Especially in UK. Don’t doubt France was at best a low seller. It’s a larger saloon. They don’t sell
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 87 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องชัย vs โชคปรีชา"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YN6e7HVnekw/mqdefault.jpg)
Used to have a 1991 Citroen XM Pallas. What a gorgeous car it was.
I rode in a '99 Citroen Xantia "zan-sha" in Belgium at the time and this car was amazing! It went up paver roads in Brussels like they were asphalt. You heard the road, not felt it. Eventually I drove it, and it cornered like a VW GTI, but normally the suspension was perfect!
I owned three different Xantias, and they were all a revelation. The car had passive rear steering, so you cold really push it in the bends, but beware the squirrely handling at the limit!
My elderly grand parents had an XM Familiale Diesel in the UK they lived off road in the country to get to their house they had to drive down a rutted track that was nearly a quarter of a mile from the main road, they though it was perfect for the job I do remember that it was quite an unreliable car as it aged especially with the brakes and electrics, the car ultimately went to the Scrap yard as many big Citroens did prematurely.
It's a shame we couldn't get this car officially back in 1992. It would have probably cost in the mid-$30,000 range instead of close to $50,000 after being imported by CXA. The XM wagon would have been great to have now.
03:00 the reason why people bought a Citroën back then, the best ride quality of all cars back then
the Xantia has even the best results in the Swedish elk test
I believe the Xantia holds the "moose test" record to this day.
Naaa volvo 240
@@Tuppoo94 XM and Xantia is best cars of Citroem
I think this is a beautiful car; sad that Americans dislike French cars. I’d own it!
Not all Americans.
Good camerawork for the '90's
That is like $98,395 today. That is a little bit more than I value it at, I think I will go with a Saab. Cool car tho.
Actually, that V6 engine (PRV) was installed in the DeLorean too. ;)
Not this one.
What engine was installed in that one??
@@jlindborg1105 That was the 2849 cc from the Peugeot 604/505/Renault 25. This XM uses the later 3L.
@@KR1275 I was actually under the impression that it factually was the PRV engine that was installed in the DeLorean. Peugeot Renault Volvo. 2963 cc.
@@KR1275 This the 12valve PRV v6. The 24V is completely different.
XM wonderfully different. Totally an oddball rare buy in EU. Especially in UK. Don’t doubt France was at best a low seller. It’s a larger saloon. They don’t sell
They made over 300,000 that ain’t bad for a high-priced premium car. I can still see at least one or two every week.
These cars were bullit proof. Very durable and reliable.
I was a mechanic back then when those cars where 2 years old (Europe)
My god always something broken they loved the service shop!!
Most of them luckily 4 cil gas or Diesel engines.
They drove nice when they did…🙃
Later versions are much more reliable... even citroen fans reccomend avoid first gen...
@@FEGTTTSDH The lack of reliability only applies to the very first production year(s?).
The cost cutters botched up the electronic connectors, IIRC keeping test connectors in the first production batches.
They changed that weakness quickly and the first Generation (Y3) is even more rust resistant than the second (Y4) produced from 1994 onwards.
I would love to have seen a Citroen XM hatchback, XM wagon, and a Peugeot 605 here in America. They all sound like great upscale cars.
Presumably those smaller headlamps and therefore wider grille are US spec. Or am I seeing things?
yes, the headlights were from some kind of Pontiac or Oldsmobile of the time, done to meet some US regulatons.
@@aaaabababa they look OEM to me
@@aviestrela they aren't, you can clearly see that they aren't as wide and that the grille is widened to make it look like it's supposed to be that way.
They're the headlights from an early 90s Pontiac Grand Prix, which are a little narrower than the original lights. There's a painted piece to fill the gap.
What might have been 'wrong' with the original lamps...?@@compu85
Thats pretty good money back then
Unfortunately there hasn't been a french car imported into the US in nearly 30 years!
You should be happy that they aren’t importing french cars as they are horrendously bad
You have no idea about Cars from France 🙈
@@christinajoachim386 I fix them for a living they are hideous to repair and are poorly designed
... poorly designed??? 🙄It's not true, have in actually a great Technology. I own 12 Hydropneumatik-Cars. 3.0 hdi C6, C5, 3x xm y4 v6, Xantia Activa v6 and 4 further Xantia, BX, GSA Pallas. I believe, I have enough Experience that to say.... 😉
Which have you owned?@@bmwman1981
apart from the ill-fated and unreliable Audi Offroad, large Citroens are the ONLY vehicles that are a relaxing drive at 110 mhp, can up their suspension in case of high water or a snowdrift, and have good fuel economy. A truly civilized and versatile car. Setright knew what he was talking about when he praised them.
Et maintenant pour quelque chose de complètement différent.
A very beautiful car 😊👍
Best car of Citroen
What is that Pooh Show he's talking about?
I would love to see a test to that famous french Poohjoe car.
In this case, American English is closer to the French pronunciation than British English... Unless I am mistaken. Same in how Americans say Citro-en, more similar to the French pronunciation.
@@TassieLorenzo and how does that relate with any of what I said? I really don't see where you are getting at.
What a supercar this was
Reminds me of an ‘88 Tercel hatchback
Wait....What???
@@ohguy1991 Profile view particularly, it has subtle similarities.
I hate how Americans call Peugeot "Poo-joe"
$128,116 in 2023. I’m shook
I think the proce was only so high because of the cost to import it and make it US legal.
Must've been 1's of them brought in🤔
I'm assuming that their business model failed.
Citroen is NOT a reliable car!!
I m professional mechanic in Europe for 25 years!!
No French car is reliable!!
Even today!
Except 1994 Renault Twingo!!🙂🤣
When I was self employed I had two Citroen Dispatch vans (98 and 02) that went way past 200K miles without a hitch. My 2015 Renault Trafic I sold with 225K a year ago and the guy still has it and uses it daily. I also had two Ford Transits that were nothing but trouble.
Oh please…
And how exactly is it not reliable ? Some owners had issues, some of them hadnt any, so it mostly depends on luck, same with modern German and Italian crap.
I have worked on Citroëns for 30 years and in the same time driven over a million km in XM´s. And I´m happy to say that you don´t know what you are talking about. The XM is a VERY reliable car. And no, I´m not a "Citroën only". My personal "collection" has always had both Swedish and German cars together with the French. One of my four XM´s has over 500000km on the clock and has not left me stranded once. The myth about poor reliability is only kept alive by bad mechanics that doesn´t know anything about Citroëns, and of course bad journalists like this one in motorweek. Long time since I saw such a bad review. I mean, he managed to complain about interior space in the front in the car with the same space as an S-class. Also, complaining about body-roll when Tiff Needell judged the handling on par with a Lotus. I guess it´s like when biased motorweek killed the Isuzu Trooper in the handling test (and lost in court after beeing sued). Bad journalists makes bad tests.
@@michaelheimbrand5424 Wow that is nice to hear. We had C5 Estate 1.6 HDI 1.Gen (bought new), it had few factory issues in the beginning , but after issues were resolved it ran flawlessly, sadly it was sold at 125K KM, because of financial reasons. Modern hydropneumatic suspension can last a long a time before it needs some servicing, but for comfort it is definitely worth the money.
55k in '93 for an ugly unreliable car? 🤣🤣🤣 that's a lot of money even today for a reliable car
The XM is a delightful sleek aerodynamic wedge, thank you very much! Not some boring 3-box sedan. 😉
The idea the quality is noticeably worse than other European cars is untrue IMO. Besides a little TLC is part of the charm. Same goes for the even more beautiful Alfa Romeo 164. 😊
This looks like a French Chevy Corsica that’s way too expensive
Too expensive for what?
We’re so lucky they stopped importing these
XM wonderfully different. Totally an oddball rare buy in EU. Especially in UK. Don’t doubt France was at best a low seller. It’s a larger saloon. They don’t sell