Yes I did. We see so little of him that I forgot he existed. He was supposed to be in one of the cancelled games so maybe that's why they added him to the Lords Of Shadow timeline.
Right. This was the only mention of her. At the end of her game, she has a child that is widely believed to be hers and Alucard's. While not confirmed that child could be Trevor, Christopher, or Simon since Legends was originally supposed to be the Castlevania origin story.
Sonya isn't a Belmont in the official timeline. Her inclusion actually makes it impossible for the rest of the Belmont to continue given she was supposed to have had a child with Alucard. That would require her to have a child out of wedlock regardless to carry on the Belmont name because women take on their husband's surname. If anyone knows anything about history and Eastern Europe, you're disowned or worse for having kids outside of marriage and that child is considered a bastard and doesn't inherit anything. So either she has a dhampir that breaks it being possible for Belmont like to continue or she has a kid that doesn't actually become head of the clan. It's part why Iga excluded it and also the team behind Legends didn't actually put thought behind it.
The most badass vampire killer family. Yes
Bro forgot about victor from LOS2
Yes I did. We see so little of him that I forgot he existed. He was supposed to be in one of the cancelled games so maybe that's why they added him to the Lords Of Shadow timeline.
@@Vampiresanddemonds yeah he was supposed to be in game where sonia was supposed to be featured in
0:51 But she is not Canon right?
Right. This was the only mention of her. At the end of her game, she has a child that is widely believed to be hers and Alucard's. While not confirmed that child could be Trevor, Christopher, or Simon since Legends was originally supposed to be the Castlevania origin story.
You burned the story..., But thank you ✨
Correct. It presents too many issues to be possible.
Yessssd
Sonya isn't a Belmont in the official timeline. Her inclusion actually makes it impossible for the rest of the Belmont to continue given she was supposed to have had a child with Alucard. That would require her to have a child out of wedlock regardless to carry on the Belmont name because women take on their husband's surname. If anyone knows anything about history and Eastern Europe, you're disowned or worse for having kids outside of marriage and that child is considered a bastard and doesn't inherit anything. So either she has a dhampir that breaks it being possible for Belmont like to continue or she has a kid that doesn't actually become head of the clan. It's part why Iga excluded it and also the team behind Legends didn't actually put thought behind it.