FreeCAD FEM VS SolidWorks FEA Simulation - How Do They Compare?|JOKO ENGINEERING|

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Download this model:
    grabcad.com/library/solidwork...
    FREE SolidWorks Certification Course
    alison.com/course/solidworks-...
    Questions?
    jokoengineering
    jokoengineeringhelp@gmail.com
    If there is music in this video, it is legally used.

ความคิดเห็น • 50

  • @dimchohvarchilkov683
    @dimchohvarchilkov683 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent comparison! Thank you.

  • @DonnDIY
    @DonnDIY 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very informative. Thank you!

  • @wardropcr
    @wardropcr ปีที่แล้ว

    Great side-by-side. Thanks!

  • @berndhahnebach5784
    @berndhahnebach5784 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Great video, but as stated before the post processing pipline in FreeCAD lets you make post processing as nice as solid works! All off you guys are very welcome to share your FreeCAD FEM experience on the FreeCAD forum. cheers bernd

  • @JWAM
    @JWAM 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Excellent! Would be fun to try out on some future 3d-prints, as well as CNC-stuff. I need to migrate to FreeCAD fully so that I can build an automated pipeline from online-orders of custom things (such as a parametric wooden box) to g-code.

  • @iwbnwif
    @iwbnwif 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video, thank you! I want to model my planned house additions now!

  • @SomeGuyInSandy
    @SomeGuyInSandy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like fun to play with!

  • @xavicastello1
    @xavicastello1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good job. People like me will be less afraid of using open souce FEA now :)

  • @VeganRashad
    @VeganRashad 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you.

  • @gokhancakir6742
    @gokhancakir6742 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you. Very helpful

  • @loganxmen3114
    @loganxmen3114 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cool Gracias from Santiago of Chile.....👏👏👏👏👏👏.....😷👷

  • @williamweatherall8333
    @williamweatherall8333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very cool video. Thank you.

  • @LJHuang-jn8bj
    @LJHuang-jn8bj 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    great works

  • @SomeTechGuy666
    @SomeTechGuy666 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video.

  • @hesperaux
    @hesperaux 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So cool.

  • @anthoh5
    @anthoh5 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks

  • @sonofsun4
    @sonofsun4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    How would you proceed, if the force would be applied unevenly, say, close to only one side or close to only one leg of the table?

    • @fullfrontgunchannel3197
      @fullfrontgunchannel3197 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I don't know how to do it in Free CAD but in SolidWorks, you can make a sketch on the surface and do a split line command. Then in the simulation, you can pick the area you did the split line on instead of the whole face

  • @TECHNO_TURK
    @TECHNO_TURK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Maybe freecad fem developer can work on the color temperature resolution if we all ask them :D

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolutely! Also see this on visualization if you have not already:
      th-cam.com/video/zCi632QRcAE/w-d-xo.html

  • @CoopKeith1
    @CoopKeith1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I keep encountering an issue with FEM, saying FEM mesh has no volume elements, either define a shell thickness or provide a FEM mesh with volume elements.

  • @samfriedman2301
    @samfriedman2301 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What do you say regarding SelfCAD?

  • @Z-add
    @Z-add 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is a good 4 years old video. Can we get an update to the freecad fem.

  • @SlavaVB
    @SlavaVB ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you import an STL and do stress test on it?

  • @glitterkitten9499
    @glitterkitten9499 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it possible to do impact simulation in FreeCAD? For example a bullet hitting a armor plate

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have not tried a dynamic analysis like that, it would be an interesting question on the freecadweb.org forum. I would probably approach it by placing the equivalent force of the bullet on the surface area it would impact and see if it would go beyond the yield strength. Tracking the deformation of the bullet would be some real complex stuff though.

  • @Akshadeep27
    @Akshadeep27 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, thanks for the video. I want to know if there is any 5 or 6 axis free cam software

  • @catweazlemagic7483
    @catweazlemagic7483 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hummmmmmmmm, very interesting a stress peak on one node point: the table leg that is. A bit of local remeshing would be nice.

  • @Akshadeep27
    @Akshadeep27 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I mean to say is there any open source cam software for 5 or 6 axis

  • @malekkinos
    @malekkinos 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Apparently the simulation is about a table of solid metal. The elements are not hollow. Am' I right?

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's correct, if you look at the description you can download the models to see for yourself.

    • @malekkinos
      @malekkinos 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JokoEngineeringhelp I did it. I was surprised because incredibly strong, compared with a real metal table, thank you.

  • @atnfn
    @atnfn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bad colors in FreeCad if you're a bit color blind, the greens and yellows almost look the same.

    • @JokoEngineeringhelp
      @JokoEngineeringhelp  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      All FEA uses this sort of color scale, but the FreeCAD pipeline can put the color on a greyscale

  • @doublestarsystem
    @doublestarsystem 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Both softwares are equivalent...since there is no exact math formula to predict stress distribution with accuracy...only lab experience do...like aerodynamic profile for planes: Only miniature models in wind tunnels tell if the prototype is valid...no algorithm work

    • @ajarivas72
      @ajarivas72 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      :
      You are so right.
      People tend to think that a FEA solution is an exact solution or a good representation of reality. It is not.
      Even if the model mimic 100% the real system, nothing warranties that the numeric solution is correct. All numeric methods can fail or yield wrong results when converging to a wrong solution.

    • @Eng_Simoes
      @Eng_Simoes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      There are several formulae to predict stress distribution with KNOWN accuracy. Know your physics and know your software prior to analysis. Being able to turn a guitar on doesn't make you a rockstar. That said, I am not familiar with any accurate method ( as you're ALL about accuracy) to measure actual stress distribution on physical model.

    • @ajarivas72
      @ajarivas72 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Eng_Simoes
      Rafael
      Knowing how to use a FEA software does not make you an expert in stress analysis

    • @yodaiam1000
      @yodaiam1000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The equations of statics and the elastic compatibility for a true elastic material do have theoretically exact answers. Differences in meshing will produce different numerical results. The FEA are not developed from experimentation, they are developed from statics and compatibility of elastic materials. If you are dealing with non-linear materials, then you need to use experimentation for those properties. You would also not be using a linear static analysis.

    • @lawrencedoliveiro9104
      @lawrencedoliveiro9104 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is FreeCAD doing Delaunay triangulation?

  • @absolute___zero
    @absolute___zero 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    you converted the object to mesh, but what if the object was joined using bolts? bolts have much smaller contact area than a monolithic object, therefore this simulation doesn't worth a dime, because it assumes the table is made out of an entire piece of wood (or whatever)