- 1st mistake trusting TA data. - 2nd mistake circulating TA Cali propaganda list. The truth is TV partner want programs with fanbase will watch (good& bad yrs), fill stadiums, and sell merchandise. Thats means these programs are in trouble: * Stanford, Cal, Indiana, NWern, Illinois, Rughers, Vandi, Kentucky, WF, SMU, GT, Cus, Duke. Lose there seat to programs such as: * BYU, CIncy, UCF, OSU, BOISE St. Its not about academics & waterpolo it about CFB business model and making money, perod.
@@cjon3006 And you are WRONG on MOST of what you posted. But hey!! Don't let FACTS and NUMBERS interfere with your EMOTIONS and FEELINGS!! i.e. In 2023, the revenue generated, not including TV media payouts, by the athletic program of Rutgers EXCEEDED that of UCLA!! UCLA is now #18 in The B1G Conference behind #17 Rutgers. Funny YOUR EMOTIONS didn't include UCLA in your list of "bottom dwellers."??! And USC ranks at #11!!! Behind Minnesota and ahead of Maryland!!! Stanford is the #33 Nationally Ranked TV Viewership....which is 10 spots ahead of #43 BYU....and the others you listed as "replacements" are so low on the list they belong on a streaming-only platform.....Boise is even way lower than SMU at #70! And funny you didn't include Missouri on YOUR list since they ranked lower than #32 Indiana; #44 Northwestern; #41 Kentucky. If you think anybody lower than #33 Stanford should be eliminated.....then why didn't you include #34 WVU; #35 South Carolina; #37 Utah; #40 UNC?!!!!!!!
They have raised a ton of money, but they need to perform first. After that, I am definitely going to bump them up. Plus, TV viewership will certainly rise in the ACC for them.
There are college programs on the rise now that would be left out if the college football system locked them out. Schools like SJSU, SDSU, Fresno St, probably Boise gets left out, then there's Tulane, SMU, Coastal Carolina, Memphis, USF, UTSA, Temple, UAB, UNT, Troy, James Madison, NM St, NM, UNLV, Toldeo, Marshall, ECU, Appalachian State, Charlotte, UConn, UMass, ... etc. These are all potential rising stars. Many are in major metropolitan areas with large student bodies (UNT has 45,000 students, for example; Liberty has 90,000 students).
If Texas A&M leaves the SEC the Big 10 will snap them up in a heart beat. Florida and Texas are the only two major TV markets that aren’t covered by the Big 10.
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen Penn Staters will PAY to NEVER have to deal with sPitt ever again!! Their fans are basically Steelers fans from the burgh and DON'T know how to act!! sPitt was offered to continue the series but ONLY 2-for-1. Because Penn State played most of the series in Pittsburgh....and sPitt OVERCHARGED for the Penn State game because they knew predominantly Penn State fans would pay the prices for tickets. It was cheaper to buy a sPitt season ticket than just that single game. So, Penn Staters did, then sold the others online for $1, or donated them to local high schools, or burnt the other game tickets in the parking lots as sPitt fans walked by.🤣🤣🤣 And Virginia Tech fans say the same thing about playing WVU! Even WVU fans dominate the Heinz Field when they play sPitt! sPitt is a "city school". With NO place to even put a stadium on its campus. Just like Temple. Colleges must have an ON-Campus stadium to survive. THAT is the reality in the coming years. After 48-14, it's been ALL DOWNHILL for sPitt!
If you’re going to do a College Football Super League, I recommend you either have a 68-team league or even an 80-team league. Then…please bear with me…you could do a “Civil War” style league with 2 conferences. 40 teams in each conference, and 5 divisions with 8 teams in each division. P.S. I’m a big U.S. History buff. That’s where this idea comes from. 💡🧐
I'm having a problem with My MOUNTAINEERS being ranked 51st. There's absolutely no way they should ever be ranked outside the top 40. Just my opinion, looking forward to week 3 😁 let's go MOUNTAINEERS
After the two super duper gigantic conferences start splitting off because they will claim that they are getting screwed we will be right back where we started.
When you create a league like that all networks are involved. They wouldn’t lose money. Also, kinda funny when the majority of the Big Ten besides Ohio State and Michigan are mediocre. 😂😂
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen but they are the highest watched conference..the problem with the media nowadays is that just because you didn't win a championship that it means your worthless..that is sad. Even a Northwestern's brand is worth more then say west Virginia, PItt , I would even say Miami too
@@joemetallo2183 no they are not. Big Ten would push numerous teams out in a heart beat. Without question. So much dead weight. And when you add all those teams together with the other networks and teams that want to use their resources, they would not lose money because viewership would be through the roof.
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen actually no..the big ten presidents would not let that happen! I know it doesn't fit the agenda that the media wants but there are 100 million other fans that just watch their teams and could care less for other games..just because Alabama is playing say Georgia doesn't mean it gets watched by all the football fans, sure they get the diehard football fans but the average fan will watch their favorite team and then go about their life
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen wtf are you talking about? They go 5 to 6 teams deep and will be better when Michigan State gets going again. The original schools are grandfathered in so they are not going anywhere. If anything the power 2 breaks off.
Terrible list! In no universe should West Virginia be listed below any of the following...!!!! Maryland, Arkansas, Illinois, Arizona St, TCU, Indiana, Purdue, Duke, Colorado, NC State, Virginia, Northwestern, Rutgers NO WAY! Move WVU up to a bare minimum of 38. And then there are anouther 10-15 schools that WVU has a strong case against. That would put ius clsoer to top 30. Which would be way more accurate.
The problem is the ranking has too many factors. There is only one factor that matters the total disposable income of the university fan base. That is what advertisers are looking for and that is what ESPN and Fox will provide for the highest price they can obtain. The California schools are high because while they don’t have as many fans they are far more affluent than most schools fans giving them higher total disposal incomes.
CFB league: Blue: Oregon Oregon state Washington Washington state Michigan Michigan state Pittsburgh Penn state Ohio state Cincinnati Purdue Notre Dame Northwestern West Virginia Rutgers Maryland Syracuse Boston college Indiana Illinois Nebraska Wisconsin Colorado Utah BYU Arizona Arizona state Iowa Iowa state Missouri USC UCLA California Stanford Minnesota Red: Alabama Auburn Arkansas Kansas Kansas state Oklahoma Oklahoma state Mississippi state Ole miss LSU Florida Florida state Miami UCF Texas Texas A&M Texas Tech TCU Baylor Houston SMU Georgia Georgia tech Kentucky Louisville Tennessee Vanderbilt Clemson South Carolina North Carolina North Carolina state Duke Wake forest Virginia Virginia tech
How is UMass on the list ahead of some teams? UMass is beating JMU and right next to App St. Liberty isn't even listed and they're a top tier G5. Pretty sure his methodology doesn't check out.
Your thinking based on just football, but there are numerous factors that were involved in this list. I agree, JMU should be higher though. Especially last 5 years.
If a Super League was to form like the NFL it would have to be a 64 team to make divisions. 68 wouldn’t work. That’s why I think the B1G and SEC will go to 20 teams and the Big XII 24. I wouldn’t pay too much homage to anything Tony Altimore says. He was wrong about everything PAC12 and gets verbally abusive to anyone that doesn’t agree with his narrative.
You lost me at any ranking where Pitt is listed this high by any set of metrics. Delusional. Have you ever been to a Pitt game? Seriously, come on man.
Yes I have. Have you ever been to a Pitt game? What college games have you attended? WVU? Stats came out this week that they have had an increase in attendance since 2018. Numbers don’t lie. Even if you don’t like them.
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen And Penn Staters......🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 at you!!! Are you still selling your season tickets for "Buy 1 season ticket for $119...get the second for ONLY another $19!!!"
If limited in number, at all, other than current FBS status, then the number ought to be at least 96 - determined by each Super Conference (of 3) having 32 members in their league, and even that leaves out at least 32 additional schools who should be a part of it all. (3 super conferences assumes a merger of Big12r+ACCr+Pac2.) I like college football because its college football and I hate the NFL. I don’t want to watch a 4th tier semi professional league. I want to watch college ball without the kneeling spoiled overpaid ungrateful A holes of the NFL. If you are going to do a semi pro league, then do 32, but leave my colleges and teams out please: LSU, SMU, Arkansas. Id like those colleges to remain college sports teams, not some bastardized semi pro league. And BTW, Ive been in Management (and ownership) of a third tier pro BB league team - they don’t make very much money, ownership wise or player wise. (Its not going to work.)
I agree!!! 💯. As soon as the players start getting paid....I STOP watching....NO more season tickets....NO more contributions to the football program/booster club......NO more contributions to even the scholarship fund! or even my college and department!! I'll find other more deserving organizations and charities to send my money to. My once wonderful alma mater that used to be a bastion of solid American values is turning Woke and into shit!! College is a SCAM!! It has turned into a monster of NON-taxed Corporate GREED. Tuitions are beyond belief...totally irrational and just over-priced INDOCTRINATION Camps!
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen There no way that Stanford and California should be ranked higher than Washington State and Oregon State. In the lawsuit Florida State argued that Washington State and Oregon State are more valuable than Stanford and California.
@@tylernelson3343 I agree that Stanford and Cal should be lower, but Stanford is easily above Oregon State and Washington state. Stanford Athletic department is miles ahead of them. Cal there is definitely an argument.
None of this stuff us going to happen. It's going to be just like it has always been. Just with more teams in fewer conferences. PAC is DEAD. MWC/AAC/C-USA - 1 of those is Next. Their best teams will get sucked into the Big 12 as backfill when the remaining Value is sucked out of the Big 12 in the next 5 years. B1G will not go without a piece of the Texas Market ACC will steal away the rest of the Meat on the Big 12's Bones. Big 12 will survive as the best G5. Mid 12.
There are no college football teams listed that I would be watching if that is the best that college football can come up with. I would much rather boycott college football than see any of the teams play each other that you have listed. I would encourage others to boycott with me if this is where football is going.
All but FSU, Clemson and UNC are happy staying in the ACC. Perhaps the remaining schools think that with those three schools gone, they will have legitimate shots at being ACC football champions and get into the playoffs. That’s plausible but only a short term gain for them. With the smaller CFP payout and smaller TV money it’s a diminishing financial situation for the remaining ACC faithful. The ACC will face a greater likelihood to lose ESPN’s deal then will face the same predicament the PAC10 faced, no TV deal. Sucks to be a member of the ACC.
With UNC openly saying they are connected to NC State, I believe that holds them back in the ACC. ESPN, even if they don’t exercise the option, (Which I expect them to exercise it) would engage parters Apple, CW, ESPN (would still own ACC Network just have a smaller percentage), would still have a media deal as it is now or a little more. PAC 12 and ACC situations are completely different and not even remotely the same. Regardless a new Super League is strongly being discussed as well. ACC will survive the more this goes on.
The reason why people like Tony Altimore isn’t a professional media consultant is that he doesn’t correctly weigh the true value of what college sports tv revenues produce. The reason why the NCAA Basketball Tournament dwarfs the CFP Playoffs in revenue is class of fan. Fans from schools like Kansas, Duke, North Carolina go on to hold positions in society that are much higher class than your average college football fan. There’s a reason why during college basketball games you see adds for Northwestern Mutual, Mercedes Benz and Capitol One. College Football games advertise Cheese-it’s, Dr Pepper, and Chuck-Cheese. College Basketball fans make millions upon millions of dollars more professionally than college football fans. College Basketball fans are better people and are valued much more than football fans. The proof is everywhere. The PAC 12 had great football and terrible basketball teams. That’s why the conference failed.
![[안방1열 풀캠4K] 베이비몬스터 'DRIP' (BABYMONSTER FullCam)│@SBS Inkigayo 241110](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AQ4RIghEvUs/mqdefault.jpg)
Let me know your thoughts in the comment section, like the video, and SUBSCRIBE! Thank you as always!
Are we ranking Basketball, Baseball, etc? If so, some SEC, and Big Ten schools are ranked too high.
No just football because that’s what realignment is about.
Agree 100%. I have been saying the same for months.But any algorithm that ranks Northwestern ahead of Va Tech, WVU and GA Tech is suspect.
Great show, JJ! BTW, Tony Altimore was 100% wrong on the future of the PAC 12 and he was probably intentionally dishonest about it.
Thank you for the support! I agree about Altimore. I take it with a grain of salt. I do like footballscoop though.
- 1st mistake trusting TA data.
- 2nd mistake circulating TA Cali propaganda list.
The truth is TV partner want programs with fanbase will watch (good& bad yrs), fill stadiums, and sell merchandise.
Thats means these programs are in trouble:
* Stanford, Cal, Indiana, NWern, Illinois, Rughers, Vandi, Kentucky, WF, SMU, GT, Cus, Duke.
Lose there seat to programs such as:
* BYU, CIncy, UCF, OSU, BOISE St.
Its not about academics & waterpolo it about CFB business model and making money, perod.
@@cjon3006 And you are WRONG on MOST of what you posted. But hey!! Don't let FACTS and NUMBERS interfere with your EMOTIONS and FEELINGS!!
i.e. In 2023, the revenue generated, not including TV media payouts, by the athletic program of Rutgers EXCEEDED that of UCLA!! UCLA is now #18 in The B1G Conference behind #17 Rutgers. Funny YOUR EMOTIONS didn't include UCLA in your list of "bottom dwellers."??! And USC ranks at #11!!! Behind Minnesota and ahead of Maryland!!!
Stanford is the #33 Nationally Ranked TV Viewership....which is 10 spots ahead of #43 BYU....and the others you listed as "replacements" are so low on the list they belong on a streaming-only platform.....Boise is even way lower than SMU at #70!
And funny you didn't include Missouri on YOUR list since they ranked lower than #32 Indiana; #44 Northwestern; #41 Kentucky.
If you think anybody lower than #33 Stanford should be eliminated.....then why didn't you include #34 WVU; #35 South Carolina; #37 Utah; #40 UNC?!!!!!!!
Good to see the Beavs and Cougs make the cut, they've had a rough year.
Yes. I’d even want them in the ACC too. Love their schools.
Go WVU..looking for a great season
Excited for the Backyard Brawl!
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen oh yeah..will be fun
I’ve heard that SMU is raising lots of money. Might want to move them up in the list.
They have raised a ton of money, but they need to perform first. After that, I am definitely going to bump them up. Plus, TV viewership will certainly rise in the ACC for them.
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen SMU vs. Miami could eventually become a good rivalry.
@@donnie2832 yes. It will be interesting to see what SMU does.
There are college programs on the rise now that would be left out if the college football system locked them out. Schools like SJSU, SDSU, Fresno St, probably Boise gets left out, then there's Tulane, SMU, Coastal Carolina, Memphis, USF, UTSA, Temple, UAB, UNT, Troy, James Madison, NM St, NM, UNLV, Toldeo, Marshall, ECU, Appalachian State, Charlotte, UConn, UMass, ... etc.
These are all potential rising stars. Many are in major metropolitan areas with large student bodies (UNT has 45,000 students, for example; Liberty has 90,000 students).
James Madison, Boise state, Fresno state, App State are clear rising programs so far
No way any of those schools make it if it comes down to 60-66 schools. If it’s 70-75 they make it.
If Texas A&M leaves the SEC the Big 10 will snap them up in a heart beat. Florida and Texas are the only two major TV markets that aren’t covered by the Big 10.
@@matthewhuszarik4173 I actually expect Texas A&M to go to the Big Ten at some point. Just to mess with Texas.
Congratulations on hitting 1k.
Thanks brother!
I'm curious, IF you had to choose, would you Rather continue with the "Backyard Brawl", or revive the Penn State rivalry with Pitt?
Pitt vs WVU. Penn State is a lost cause. It would be great but that school is lost. It’s a shame
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen Penn Staters will PAY to NEVER have to deal with sPitt ever again!! Their fans are basically Steelers fans from the burgh and DON'T know how to act!! sPitt was offered to continue the series but ONLY 2-for-1. Because Penn State played most of the series in Pittsburgh....and sPitt OVERCHARGED for the Penn State game because they knew predominantly Penn State fans would pay the prices for tickets. It was cheaper to buy a sPitt season ticket than just that single game. So, Penn Staters did, then sold the others online for $1, or donated them to local high schools, or burnt the other game tickets in the parking lots as sPitt fans walked by.🤣🤣🤣
And Virginia Tech fans say the same thing about playing WVU! Even WVU fans dominate the Heinz Field when they play sPitt!
sPitt is a "city school". With NO place to even put a stadium on its campus. Just like Temple. Colleges must have an ON-Campus stadium to survive. THAT is the reality in the coming years. After 48-14, it's been ALL DOWNHILL for sPitt!
If you’re going to do a College Football Super League, I recommend you either have a 68-team league or even an 80-team league. Then…please bear with me…you could do a “Civil War” style league with 2 conferences. 40 teams in each conference, and 5 divisions with 8 teams in each division.
P.S. I’m a big U.S. History buff. That’s where this idea comes from. 💡🧐
64 or 72 at most
Good Video! Thanks for sharing.
I'm having a problem with My MOUNTAINEERS being ranked 51st. There's absolutely no way they should ever be ranked outside the top 40. Just my opinion, looking forward to week 3 😁 let's go MOUNTAINEERS
I agree. Backyard brawl will be great as always.
As long as my team is not 69 I’m good
Ikr… nerds 😅
Well that's the rub, yeah? Lol. There's always teams on the bubble
Liberty and Coastal Carolina should be in
Highly unlikely just due to lack of resources and being in the G5. It’s hard to imagine any of the G5 make it in.
Let’s gooooooooo! 68 😅
lol! Wish Oregon State and Washington State joined the ACC as well. Two great schools and fan bases.
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen hopefully soon 🤞 between calford travel and possible more shakeup I think we’d be getting the call
@@HMbeav8404 I would expect that as well.
Nice job on this video
Thank you for the support as always. 💪🏼
After the two super duper gigantic conferences start splitting off because they will claim that they are getting screwed we will be right back where we started.
Purdue gets in
I hope they do. I like Purdue.
Who you kidding Big ten teams are not going to give up 100 million a year for the teams and they're like pit etc
When you create a league like that all networks are involved. They wouldn’t lose money. Also, kinda funny when the majority of the Big Ten besides Ohio State and Michigan are mediocre. 😂😂
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen but they are the highest watched conference..the problem with the media nowadays is that just because you didn't win a championship that it means your worthless..that is sad. Even a Northwestern's brand is worth more then say west Virginia, PItt , I would even say Miami too
@@joemetallo2183 no they are not. Big Ten would push numerous teams out in a heart beat. Without question. So much dead weight. And when you add all those teams together with the other networks and teams that want to use their resources, they would not lose money because viewership would be through the roof.
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen actually no..the big ten presidents would not let that happen! I know it doesn't fit the agenda that the media wants but there are 100 million other fans that just watch their teams and could care less for other games..just because Alabama is playing say Georgia doesn't mean it gets watched by all the football fans, sure they get the diehard football fans but the average fan will watch their favorite team and then go about their life
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen wtf are you talking about? They go 5 to 6 teams deep and will be better when Michigan State gets going again. The original schools are grandfathered in so they are not going anywhere. If anything the power 2 breaks off.
Terrible list! In no universe should West Virginia be listed below any of the following...!!!!
Maryland, Arkansas, Illinois, Arizona St, TCU, Indiana, Purdue, Duke, Colorado, NC State, Virginia, Northwestern, Rutgers
NO WAY! Move WVU up to a bare minimum of 38. And then there are anouther 10-15 schools that WVU has a strong case against. That would put ius clsoer to top 30. Which would be way more accurate.
A 68-team super conference will NEVER happen.
Never say never. Breakoff coming soon from NCAA I’m hearing.
The problem is the ranking has too many factors. There is only one factor that matters the total disposable income of the university fan base. That is what advertisers are looking for and that is what ESPN and Fox will provide for the highest price they can obtain. The California schools are high because while they don’t have as many fans they are far more affluent than most schools fans giving them higher total disposal incomes.
Right they set this up to make sure they include certain schools which makes the whole thing bullshit 😂😂
The G5 schools should switch to spring football and form their own championship.
Tony is not creditable
Credible.
I wouldn't put any value in anything from Tony Altimore. His charts and numbers are dishonest, cherry-picked, and biased. He's a clown.
Yes in some, but this list was made by FootballScoop. They have been great. And some of Altimores stuff has been pretty good lately.
Tony Altimore lacks credibility.
WVU is criminaly low. We are easily a top 30 choice. And I am shocked that BYU is in the 70s.
#34 WVU
CFB league:
Blue:
Oregon
Oregon state
Washington
Washington state
Michigan
Michigan state
Pittsburgh
Penn state
Ohio state
Cincinnati
Purdue
Notre Dame
Northwestern
West Virginia
Rutgers
Maryland
Syracuse
Boston college
Indiana
Illinois
Nebraska
Wisconsin
Colorado
Utah
BYU
Arizona
Arizona state
Iowa
Iowa state
Missouri
USC
UCLA
California
Stanford
Minnesota
Red:
Alabama
Auburn
Arkansas
Kansas
Kansas state
Oklahoma
Oklahoma state
Mississippi state
Ole miss
LSU
Florida
Florida state
Miami
UCF
Texas
Texas A&M
Texas Tech
TCU
Baylor
Houston
SMU
Georgia
Georgia tech
Kentucky
Louisville
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
Clemson
South Carolina
North Carolina
North Carolina state
Duke
Wake forest
Virginia
Virginia tech
VERY BIASED !!!
How so?
Disagree with these rankings. Why? Because SMU will make sure they buy there way into Heaven. Opps, I meant the Power 2, or the Top 20.
Possible but I doubt it. Too much power in those two conferences.
How is UMass on the list ahead of some teams? UMass is beating JMU and right next to App St. Liberty isn't even listed and they're a top tier G5. Pretty sure his methodology doesn't check out.
Your thinking based on just football, but there are numerous factors that were involved in this list. I agree, JMU should be higher though. Especially last 5 years.
If a Super League was to form like the NFL it would have to be a 64 team to make divisions. 68 wouldn’t work.
That’s why I think the B1G and SEC will go to 20 teams and the Big XII 24.
I wouldn’t pay too much homage to anything Tony Altimore says. He was wrong about everything PAC12 and gets verbally abusive to anyone that doesn’t agree with his narrative.
I don’t believe some of the rankings. Especially Utah’s.
I think Utah should be a little higher. I agree.
Small payouts with 68 teams. Unacceptable number for blueblood schools. 32 is realistic.
You lost me at any ranking where Pitt is listed this high by any set of metrics. Delusional. Have you ever been to a Pitt game? Seriously, come on man.
Yes I have. Have you ever been to a Pitt game? What college games have you attended? WVU? Stats came out this week that they have had an increase in attendance since 2018. Numbers don’t lie. Even if you don’t like them.
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen And Penn Staters......🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 at you!!!
Are you still selling your season tickets for "Buy 1 season ticket for $119...get the second for ONLY another $19!!!"
If limited in number, at all, other than current FBS status, then the number ought to be at least 96 - determined by each Super Conference (of 3) having 32 members in their league, and even that leaves out at least 32 additional schools who should be a part of it all. (3 super conferences assumes a merger of Big12r+ACCr+Pac2.)
I like college football because its college football and I hate the NFL. I don’t want to watch a 4th tier semi professional league. I want to watch college ball without the kneeling spoiled overpaid ungrateful A holes of the NFL.
If you are going to do a semi pro league, then do 32, but leave my colleges and teams out please: LSU, SMU, Arkansas. Id like those colleges to remain college sports teams, not some bastardized semi pro league.
And BTW, Ive been in Management (and ownership) of a third tier pro BB league team - they don’t make very much money, ownership wise or player wise.
(Its not going to work.)
Bubble life 😅
I agree!!! 💯. As soon as the players start getting paid....I STOP watching....NO more season tickets....NO more contributions to the football program/booster club......NO more contributions to even the scholarship fund! or even my college and department!! I'll find other more deserving organizations and charities to send my money to. My once wonderful alma mater that used to be a bastion of solid American values is turning Woke and into shit!! College is a SCAM!! It has turned into a monster of NON-taxed Corporate GREED. Tuitions are beyond belief...totally irrational and just over-priced INDOCTRINATION Camps!
TCU Horned Frogs are one of the TOP Big XII Programs
I wouldn’t say one of the top but there is so much criteria that went into the rankings. Still a good program.
Haha Pitt at 28 🙄…who made this list Dave Wannstedt ?
@@Scottwvu lol I knew one WVU fan would be upset
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen I had to give you crap when I saw you were a Pitt fan. It’s was a great video. Im going to subscribe.
@@Scottwvu you are the best Scott. Pumped WVU and Pitt are playing again. It better never go away lol. Best rivalry in football!
I DO NOT AGREE !!!!
Why not? Would love to hear your thoughts.
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen My opinion is that Stanford and California are ranked too high in the list.
@@tylernelson3343 I would agree with that.
@@talkingcfbwithJJKitchen There no way that Stanford and California should be ranked higher than Washington State and Oregon State. In the lawsuit Florida State argued that Washington State and Oregon State are more valuable than Stanford and California.
@@tylernelson3343 I agree that Stanford and Cal should be lower, but Stanford is easily above Oregon State and Washington state. Stanford Athletic department is miles ahead of them. Cal there is definitely an argument.
I think a 68 team league is too large. I think it will be a 48 team league at most.
Very good point. I would actually like that a lot.
None of this stuff us going to happen. It's going to be just like it has always been.
Just with more teams in fewer conferences. PAC is DEAD. MWC/AAC/C-USA - 1 of those is Next.
Their best teams will get sucked into the Big 12 as backfill when the remaining Value is sucked out of the Big 12 in the next 5 years.
B1G will not go without a piece of the Texas Market
ACC will steal away the rest of the Meat on the Big 12's Bones.
Big 12 will survive as the best G5. Mid 12.
@@MercerKnowsBall I think this will happen. Get rid of teams who don’t have the resources and then those that do. It’s coming.
@@MercerKnowsBall I think the B1G and the SEC go to 24 teams each for a total of 48. All the other FBS teams will play in G5 conferences.
@@Patrick-sg7cm I feel like they will take teams who can compete and drop teams that can’t.
Hmmm... 68 teams. That is enough for a POWER THREE.
3 Conference Networks. Coincidence. Nope. ACC, SEC, B1G - then a Mid 12 on Tier 2.
There are no college football teams listed that I would be watching if that is the best that college football can come up with. I would much rather boycott college football than see any of the teams play each other that you have listed. I would encourage others to boycott with me if this is where football is going.
Total crap
All but FSU, Clemson and UNC are happy staying in the ACC. Perhaps the remaining schools think that with those three schools gone, they will have legitimate shots at being ACC football champions and get into the playoffs. That’s plausible but only a short term gain for them. With the smaller CFP payout and smaller TV money it’s a diminishing financial situation for the remaining ACC faithful. The ACC will face a greater likelihood to lose ESPN’s deal then will face the same predicament the PAC10 faced, no TV deal. Sucks to be a member of the ACC.
With UNC openly saying they are connected to NC State, I believe that holds them back in the ACC. ESPN, even if they don’t exercise the option, (Which I expect them to exercise it) would engage parters Apple, CW, ESPN (would still own ACC Network just have a smaller percentage), would still have a media deal as it is now or a little more. PAC 12 and ACC situations are completely different and not even remotely the same. Regardless a new Super League is strongly being discussed as well. ACC will survive the more this goes on.
The reason why people like Tony Altimore isn’t a professional media consultant is that he doesn’t correctly weigh the true value of what college sports tv revenues produce.
The reason why the NCAA Basketball Tournament dwarfs the CFP Playoffs in revenue is class of fan.
Fans from schools like Kansas, Duke, North Carolina go on to hold positions in society that are much higher class than your average college football fan.
There’s a reason why during college basketball games you see adds for Northwestern Mutual, Mercedes Benz and Capitol One.
College Football games advertise Cheese-it’s, Dr Pepper, and Chuck-Cheese.
College Basketball fans make millions upon millions of dollars more professionally than college football fans. College Basketball fans are better people and are valued much more than football fans.
The proof is everywhere.
The PAC 12 had great football and terrible basketball teams. That’s why the conference failed.
UCLA is actually more important than LSU and Cal is actually more important than Oregon when you see nothing but football you lose track of reality…
This is a post about a college FOOTBALL league so football is what's important.
Cal should be ghosted