Bridge Camera Still Worth Buying and Beaten Some Top Mirrorless Camera
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2024
- Jack of all trades, but master of none- this is what comes into many people's minds when they think about the Bridge camera. To some extent, you can say it’s a trade-off, but there are some perks that you simply can’t get in other cameras. From our experience, we’ve noted some key-points that can be deciding factors for you to get one or not. So, let’s try to debunk, are bridge cameras still valuable in 2022?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our social media:
Facebook: / thecamerazone
Instagram: / thecamerazone
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: The following video abides by the TH-cam Community Guideline. The footage used in this video is for educational purposes and all the information covered in this video was collected from unofficial sources and assumptions.
***Footage, music, images, and graphics used in the video falls under TH-cam Fair Usage Policy Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976. If you have any copyright issues, please contact us.
#CameraZone #bridgecamera #compactcamera
![ไปอยู่ไสมา - ช๊อปเปอร์ โตเกียวมิวสิค [ OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sWuVNbRTJbc/mqdefault.jpg)
They are still very relevant...if they improve the resolution and the range of depth of field in the next generation bridge cameras, then they will have a competitive advantage.
I agree, I would have liked to have at least received image stabilizer even in 4K and at least 4K-60 video as many other cameras have it and even higher resolution today
I use the Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 and as long as you respect the limits of the small sensor it can give great results. I paid $400 CAD but to replace it with a mirrorless, 600 mm lens and 2x teleconveter would be several thousand dollars.
I love bridge cams for traveling. My first was a Canon S3 and then a S5 which I used for many years. Now I take along a Lumix FZ300 or an FZ1000 II or a Sony RX10 IV. Not needing to think about lenses, weight and changing is less hassle while traveling. I like mine.
Are the performances still up to the mark?
@@camerazone_ It depends, what the cameras I listed are compared to. I have a knack for Superzooms and also have the Sony 400V and the Canon HX60 which you both listed. As always it dependes on what the individual photographer wants to do with images. For my travel needs one of the two the two Lumix Cameras or the RX10IV are perfect. If I have the intention of extended use, I take along a Lumix G9 or an Olympus M5 Mk III or perhaps the trusty Canon EOS 800D or my Nikon D5200.
For my needs the cameras listed are sufficient. Perhaps I will buy a used Olympus M1 Mk II some day..
do you have the 3 cameras that you mention? which you think is better the fz or the sony?
@@ramipo1 Yes I do. The FZ1000 II is smaller and lighter and costs less. It is easy to handle. The Sony is larger, heavy, more expensive and the handling is something to get used to. The images are great. Would buy it again anytime.
I am planning to buy a fz 1000 ii. I am beginning with photography into travelling and wildlife. Will that be worth it?
The FZ300 is perfect for me, I'm doing industrial equipment inspection, it's a good all around macro/zoom perfect to document defects and sturdy enough to withstand field use.
Lumix fz1000 a 1 " bridge is the most versatile camera and excellent for photo and video. No fungus cleaning on the lens,sensor cleaning etc. Peace of mind for hobbyists .
While I have a huge kit of SLR's, DSLR's, and lenses, I still use my old Nikon Coolpix 8400 for its film like CCD sensor and more than 'good Enough' Pics which is probably why I still use my older Olympus and Nikon CCD DSLR's,
The 'Lumix Fz1000' is a great professional grade camera and a particularly good bloggers camera.
I used to use compact
Cameras years ago for their simplicity but when I restarted this year I got a couple of old bridge cameras that I found in a pawn shop one a Nikon Coolpix L 110 the other a sony
Dsc h 300 although both models are old they are still quite good starter bridge cameras especially the Sony one which has a higher zoom than the Nikon then I decided later in the year to get a newer Kodak astro zoom and settled for the 425 model as it had a mid range zoom but is still way better than the Sony because I found out that the major drawback with bridge cameras is the larger the zoom lens the heavier the camera gets so you have to draw a line of comfort of use and usibility against weight and function that is the trade off with bridge cameras
For years I was a compact camera user and gave up in the early 2000s because films were becoming more expensive and digital cameras were still very basic at an affordable price point which is around £ 200 or less but when I restarted my my old hobby at the star of 2024 after 20 year break the technology has become good enough so if you buy a new bridge camera within the affordable price point you will get one with a decent mega pixel quality and the same goes if you buy an older camera that would have sold at a higher price point 10 years ago but you can now get for around £100 or less making it a good starter camera untill you can get a newer model at a latter date
I still like and occasionally use a compact camera but like the extra versitility that you get from a bridge camera
Nature photography: Birds, flowers, Bugs… Changing lenses back and forth? No way. To annoying to me. To much to carry on, I‘m on a hike after all, not professionally engaged. It’s a hobby. Smartphone won‘t (yet) do it, I need the zoom. And the flip display. And a viewfinder.
For Wildlife changing lenses is to much of a hassle. Till you managed to get the correct lense on the animal can already have moved on...
I've only got the old Canon SX20is. The experts say its no good but I make use of all its modes and features and it works brilliantly.
I love my Panasonic FZ50 and FZ200, great cameras and I got both for under $200.
thanks for sharing
Bridge cameras are great for beginners, sure. But they are also great for nature photographers who might want to travel light. It's a "compromise camera"
you are not wrong
For me it is very relevant after having used only Bridge cameras for the last 15 years I can only use my right hand so DSLR is a big no no for me. And on video cameras, unfortunately, much has been moved to the screen on the left side more difficult on them to.
Even smartphones are much harder for me to film or photograph with as I don't have a steady grip.
So yes I hope for more development of Bridge cameras so I can continue to develop the image quality of my videos. when i have external microphones etc.
It is sad that they have fallen behind, considering that in any case Panasonic was early with both HD, Full HD and 4K
We feel the same! Hopefully, it'll come back strong!
Recently ordered a Lumix FZ300 and am excited for it!
Ive had an FZ48 Lumix for over 10 years but haven’t got much use out of it since phone camera's got so good in that period.
I have a DSLR itch i want to scratch 😂
I have two bridge cameras and one DSL that I have never bother to use it... Bridge camera is the future of the photography.
Hopefully, we'd love to see the comeback!
Fz48, FZ330 and Nikon P7100. Love all 3.
I have a nikon coolpix p1000 bridge camera for sale! Incredible for moon photography and bird/ nature photography. I have lenses and filters for it. Let me know if you're interested in purchasing!
I am chasing one Nikon Coolpix p1000 but as usual they come and they go quickly out of the shelves
Much as I would love to, they are still so expensive
"A jack of all trades is a master of none, but oftentimes better than a master of one." -OP
The S100fs served me well. Now I want the HS50EXR as a daily driver. I have a D610 and S5 Pro
still on the fence! still can't make my mind up yet, do I or don't I? such choice, full frame, DSLR, bridge, point and shoot, or stick with my phone camera? the list is endless 😰
Go for bridge camera if you want to take your photography knowledge next level. Phone photography is enough for casual uses.
@@camerazone_ I’m looking at getting a bridge camera for all round general use and the Canon Powershot SX70 seems to stand out to me, what do you think of it? Is it worth the price when I can get an EOS 4000D for almost £200 less?
I would consider what you want to shoot and how much you want to spend. Most bridge cameras are far less expensive than the equivalent DSLR or mirrorless with the same lens capabilities. I bought the Lumix DC-FZ80 and have been really enjoying it for my amateur bird and wildlife photography. It was $400 CAD but a similar equipped DSLR would be around $5000. I will admit the image quality would be better on the DSLR but I couldn't dream of spending that much unless I was making money from it.
You can have them all! I have a Nikon P950 bridge camera, Canon 90D DSLR and a Canon M50 mirrorless. Next is a full frame Camera! lol! (GAS - Gear Acquisition Syndrome).
It's useful for daylight shooting, to get close up shots without paying thousands and walking with heavy bulky equipment,using the new ai noise reduction software also makes it easier to get something useful from the small sensor
Is there a website where I can compare images of bridge cameras with images of DSLRs? For example when a Bridge camera says its has 24-600mm zoom lens, can I see an image of its 600mm zoom and compare that with the image of a proper DSLR with 600mm zoom lens?
Nikon Coolpix P900,
Canon Powershot G3X,
Panasonic Lumix FZ 2500*
Three of the most amazing cameras.
Hi. Probably no one will see this. But there is some options i can buy for starting my photography hobby again. I see this camera is good price and performance. My other option is Sony Alpha ZV-E10L APS-C 16-50 mm lens. This one is bridge camera and I don't wanna spend a lot on lenses. But the Sony has better sensor. And it's newer. Idk if I'll be happy with the Panasonic. It is heavier and so hard to carry maybe. But i like the zoom and macro options in one camera. Any help about my situation ?
Is it possible to put an APS C sized censor into a bridge camera instead of a 1 inch censor?
Sony Cybershot R1
@@photobyTaps I agree with you Sony Cybershot R1 is a great camera for it's price vs features, however it only has a fixed 24-120mm equivalent lens. With modern day technology Sony can easily put a 24-240mm equivalent lens, with possibly lower aperture for better low light performance as well as bumping up the resolution and the range of depth of field!
I wish Sony would update the A37 with their 24mp sensor
Not to mention that they have ccd sensors!
Only the older ones. The ones made after 2010 mostly all have CMOS sensors. My Panasonic FZ200 from 2012 has a CMOS sensor.
2023?
Sony RX 10 Iv is the best by far.
theres the claim that the image quakity of the rx10 iv is better than full frame cameras with thdir superzoom lenses. is there any superzoom lens that has better quality? maybe the new lumix ir nikon ones? maybe tamron 18-300 for apsc?
thanks for sharing
The damn motor,my bridge camera motor is dead and company says camera is outdated.Fuck bridge cameras.....but.....they are so convenient 😭
Sorry to hear that.
Canon PowerShot G3X is the best. 🥰