More like "you got 10 tabs open in your browser and found a single negative review in each of them leading you not even to consider any of the cameras" that's me. 🤣
Exactly this. I so dislike that whenever lower budget options are discussed, some brand fanboys always chime in with the sage advice to "just get the latest top-of-the-line model for 4.000 bucks, it's totally worth it, just start saving!" It's like, nope. I love photography, but at the end of the day it's a frivolous hobby for me, and since I'm not wealthy I absolutely can't justify dropping that amount of cash on it, even if I had it which I don't.
THings to consider: 1. Budget 2. Better build quality 3. FUlly manual and can change lenses. 4. Size of camera (micro 4:3 is smaller/lighter) 5. Image quality (smaller sensor sizes are fine if not printing massive prints) 6. Brand 7. Filming or not filming 8. Brand new vs. 2nd hand
Sorry to barge in, but I think there's another thing to consider at the top of the list : the price of the additional glass. You buy an interchangeable lens camera because you intend to change lens. (If not, go for a bridge). So the price of the other lenses you will add to your system becomes extremely important in the decision process. Usually the price of the nifty fifty one's almost bound to buy at some point is a good indication of how expensive the system is compared to the competition.
@@maryammaryam2689 Yes, absolutely. Actually the very first camera I bought getting back into photography was a Fujifilm XT1 seven or eight years ago. However, be aware because they use a different sensor than...well everyone, you may want to look into alternate editing programs. It's all a learning experience!
That's how you do it. You encourage and enable people, you ease them in, and you don't make them feel like the craft demands of them something other than their desire to learn. Good on you bro, I appreciat you.
My advice when getting a first camera is to just get the body and a cheap kit lens that covers a wide zoom range. Forget things like image quality, Image stabilization, and aperture for now. As you use that kit lens, you'll start to get a feel for what kind of photos you take most frequently and then you can start looking for lenses that fill those roles. That way you don't end up splurging on a super expensive piece of gear just to end up never using it.
hey there, I appreciate this tip. I think it is easy to get a little over-zealous to start out. That said, there are still so many dang options it's hard to choose. Any brand/model you might recommend? I am more familiar with Nikon and Canon brands, though admit I am a complete newbie with hopes to become proficient in nature/architectural photography. Thanks in advance.
@@bernardoguevara1058 I use the Canon 60D and started out with the 18-135 IS kit lens. (Skip to the end if you want the meaty bits) The wide zoom range allowed me to figure out which zoom ranges I shot most in, which is wide angle to portrait. I also noticed that I lacked low light capabilities due to a narrow aperture (f3.5-5.6). I used the Canon 50mm macro for low light since it went down to f2.5, but it wasn't image stabilized and the autofocus was slow. I considered all these factors and picked up the efs 17-55mm f2.8 for my next lens, which covers all of the mentioned issues I was having and I am very pleased with it. Now to the important bit. I would recommend a Canon 70D if this is your first camera, and its age means that good examples are 400-500 dollars. I recommend it over the 60D as it has double the autofocus points, autofocus when shooting video, in camera image processing, and a whole bunch of other improvements which I think makes the extra 100 dollars (60D is about 300) worth it. If you want to go the same route I did, you can pick up an 18-135 IS (non STM version) lens for around 200 USD. Don't bother with the STM version as you likely won't get any use out of its features when you're starting out, and you'll have grown out of it by the time those features would become useful. If you want an even lower price, a used Canon Rebel with a kit lens can go as low as 300 dollars. The downside is that you'll probably grow out of the body really quickly and find yourself seeking an upgrade. Remember to look at used and refurbished gear first. You can get some excellent deals in that area (I got my 17-55mm for 550 refurbished when it would've cost 900 new). Good used gear websites are keh and mpb as they offer 180 day warranties on their products in case something breaks. Excuse me for the wordy reply, and best of luck! :)
@justinhung9394 Justin, thanks a million for taking the time to break it down for me. I'm diligently researching, with cost in mind, and hoping to find something soon. Getting tired of this lol.🙏🏼What are your photography interests btw?
@@bernardoguevara1058 I'm just a hobbyist so I shoot just about anything, although I find myself leaning towards nature, wildlife, and city/landscapes.
I've been shooting for over 50 years and still use an "entry level camera. I switched from film to digital with a Nikon D50 about 2005. I've since moved up to a D3300. It may not do everything I'd LIKE it to do, but it does everything I NEED it to do. I can work around the features it doesn't have. For a beginner, I believe learning those workarounds will make them a better photographer. One good reason to not spend everything in the budget on the initial camera purchase is because there will be other things to buy. For starters, a second battery; if you want to shoot much video, consider a third and a fourth battery. Then there is the customary -uv filter to protect the lens; you don't want to get the cheapest one you can get unless you love soft focus. Maybe you'll want a second lens. Sooner or later your going to want a tripod. The list goes on and on.
@@patrycjaw8323 Simple question, not so simple answer. Just about anything with interchangeable lenses will work for you, but specifics depend on what you want to do with it. A body, a long zoom and a short zoom will probably do 90+% of anything you might want to photograph. It largely boils down to how much you have in the budget. But don't spend your entire budget on the camera. There will be odds and ends that can add up a fast. A bag to carry and protect your gear. An extra battery is a good thing. Filters, a tripod... there are any number of things you'll find you want/need.
I prefer my cameras to be made of metal, this is the primary reason I wouldn’t be seen dead with a Entry-Level camera. Rather than a Entry-Level digital camera, I would rather use a second-hand Nikon FM2N SLR.
As a novice photographer myself, I think there is also great use to actually learning how to properly set your camera for what you need it to do. The more you know the ins and out of your camera, the better you will get.
Overall great video. Being a professional photographer I appreciate how you guys give out great advice to beginners. My advice: A quality lens should be a consideration, it makes a huge difference. If I was just beginning in photography, my steps would be to find the best second hand high quality lens and match it with a budget body. I purchased my Canon 70-200 2.8L on craigslist very reasonably and have used it on several bodies and still use it on a mirrorless Sony today. So think of lenses first because they are the engine of your camera.
Lonnie is spot on. I have terrific pro lenses which will last the test of time. The camera body will advance in tech and features, but the lens will be sharp forever if it was best in class when you obtained it. Even so, Canon people stay Canon people because they buy.bought Canon lenses for Canon bodies. I am a Nikon user so I mostly stay within that world. If you are heading for a bridge camera with a single fixed lens then this makes no difference.
I was borrowed a Canon 400D by my uncle once he saw I showed interest in photography. I Never looked back since. The first camera I bought was a Canon 2000D and for a entry level camera this won me a couple of photo competitions. I feel this is a awesome beginner camera for the price and the quality it can produce. I have upgraded since though but the experience and knowledge the entry level brought me made me feel I deserved the upgrade.
Great to hear. I have just gifted my 400d to my 11 year old grandson. Hoping he will take the time to learn the basics. School photography class and a manual 🤞
A long time ago I bought a refurbished Canon 450D with the 18-55mm kit lens, just recently pulled it out again, charged the battery up, and it works perfectly - I love it!
"For learning photographers...start off with a budget camera." Literally the best advice I've ever heard someone say in one of these videos. And I wholeheartedly agree and make this same recommendation whenever someone asks me about getting an actual camera to start learning the craft. That said I would like to point out that 4k 60p is not super common in mid to lower range cameras and even when it is can take up a lot of space, so make sure you have a lot of storage space to work with the files in your video editing software of choice, because you will need room for the footage plus the render, and you will usually be rendering in 24p anyways so 4k 30p at 8 bit recording is absolutely more than enough for most people. And if you find yourself wanting to do a lot more slow motion video, then your needs are above the normal creators and you should look into more specialized hybrid cameras. Besides that one caveat I can safely say this is the only video I will be recommending to new photographers who ask me about cameras. As per usual you are absolutely bang on about everything here. Just, muah, chef's kiss a perfect explanation for beginners looking to get into the medium of photography.
Couldn't agree more Marc. I started off with a canon 4000d, £300 with kit lens and it blew me away with what it could do. Then 850d, then 7d mark 2 and built up to a sony A7R3. If I started with the Sony A7R3 to begin with I probably would of given up because of how complicated the sonys can be to use. I'm no professional but I started off low end and simple and built up steady and took my time.
I have a question I'm now taking my channel more seriously. I have a logitec brio web cam, should I invest in in a dslr now or just upgrade my set ( meaning was decore desk backdrop sign etc) the logitec brio does 1080p at 60fps and 4k at 30fps but it's a web cam. Help please
@@misscee6629 it doesn't really matter if its brand new or second hand. But if you go for second hand i would never get any camera with a shutter count of over 50,000 to 100,000 but that's just me. You can get lucky, I once bought a full frame canon 6d second hand what was released over 10 years ago and the shutter count was only 300. Sometimes people buy them brand new, use them a few times and give up. If money is no issue I'd go for brand new though, every time. I struggle for money, if it wasn't for selling things and getting a loan I wouldn't have the gear I have. But I love it. If you go for second hand make sure you have some guarantee from the shop, a good shop usually gives you 6 months. And they should be able to tell you the shutter count. Hope this helps 😊
I'm a beginner photographer. I've had a bit of experience wit a couple of cameras and what I found was a good thing to look out for is the Interface of the camera. So like the screens and the menus. I have the Canon 250D and that's done wonders in all things I've wated to do. It's allowed me to have a go at a range of styles of photography like nature, astro and so on. It also shoots vid that's rly good as well. When anyone asks me what one to buy I always recommend the 250D, but I do say that it is quite an expensive budget one at £600 odd for the body, 18mm to 55mm and a 55mm to 250mm. So overall its a good beginner camera if u have some cash.
One point re mirror-less versus mirrored (pentaprism) is with a mirrorless you can (with live view enabled) see what the camera will actually take, unlike a mirrored. Also you can get post image display in the viewfinder if you choose to have it. The delay issue is only really significant on high speed sports, and there are mirrorless (Sony's for example) that have extremely fast Electronic View Finders.
For beginners, the first thing I’d do is read as many photography books as I could and learn about composition etc… 2nd I’d start doing homework on cameras and decide what you want. As in any industry there is a brand war amongst consumers but the reality is that if you do step 1 then the camera won’t make a whole lot of difference. All the major brands are good these days, it mainly comes down to personal preference.
Any suggestion for books? I find sometimes books are more helpful than videos... (not to mention the algorithms that TH-cam & google start tracking you)
One important factor when picking the brand (which can vary significantly) is it’s general ecosystem: once you buy the camera, do you have a varied choice of lenses? Can you find plenty of items on the used market for when you may want to experiment with new lenses or other items?
My first camera is a7iii and I'm soo happy with my purchase, 3 years into the photo and video world video mostly I just started pushing the limits of my camera I purchased a gem of a lens the 28-75 tamron f2.8. The idea is to give it time. Shoot as much as possible.
I started with a canon t6i and just recently moved to a canon eos R and is an insane difference I love my old camera but mirrorless and full frame is beautiful
I've also been looking into the eos R and RP in the past days to be honest. What would you say makes it the cut, why would one upgrade from a t6i to an eos rp (becauise it's cheaper than the r)
@@Daniel-dj7fh If you’re not looking to spend a lot of money and the RP can get the job done I would go with the RP for me I wanted something a lil more then RP and my T7i i’m not going to lie I caught up in buying gear that I didn’t need like Sony A6100 that I don’t use just make sure whatever you do it’s an upgrade from what you already have.
I’ve been looking at getting my first camera and am liking the Canon T8i and all the advancements it had over the T6i & T7i. What are your thoughts everyone?
Good information. All cameras from the last 5 years can produce great images. I think secondhand is a good option. Everybody seems to want the latest and greatest so there are some terrific secondhand bargains at present. Also before spending a £1000+ on a camera I would rent one and see how it feels. Remember some lenses can cost more than the camera body so check out how much the lenses cost for the camera of your choice. Photography should be fun so do not take out a second mortgage to buy your first camera, you will only regret it. Rather invest the money on training courses/travel etc.
Yes, I agree. As for shutter count, my first camera was a Canon Rebel 750D (a great camera to learn on, by the way), on which it's not possible get a shutter count. It's shutter is rated at 100,000 shots, but it's been round the block easily three times that, I´m sure, and it's still going strong.
Good summary. One thing I don’t think you spent enough time on are ergonomics. How the camera fits in the hand, how the buttons and dials meet your fingers, is very important. Some cameras agree with us, others don’t, and it can be the difference between really enjoying photography and leaving the kit at home and just using your phone.
I ran a D3200 for over 5 years shooting motorsports. The last 2 I started to see where it fell short for what I needed. That being low light capability/sensor size and stabilization. So I upgraded to a D750 and it felt like a perfect transition especially paired with a 70-200 2.8 VRII. The image stabilization was a game changer
The D750 is a great camera, but for sports and telephoto I’d recommend the apsc D7200 instead… better resolution, a bit lighter to carry, and the cropped view, framing telephoto shots more tightly
This is a great comment. it's easy to say I need to upgrade. It's great when you realize why. those were some wise unrelated words I once heard but matter here too. upgrade when you know why to upgrade. Not just because it's better.
I got the canon 4000d as a starter and it's an absolutely amazing starter for very little money, it's very light and is great for learning the basics, now I'm looking to upgrade because as great as it is, it has a few features lacking like an adjustable viewfinder and no cord ports for stuff like external monitors/mics or any other equipment, it also doesn't support most external flashers, I definitely do not regret buying it though because it definitely gave me what I needed as a starter
I actually just picked a 4000d up for myself as a starter camera. I'm loving it so far, do you any recommendations for additional lenses you picked up along the way?
@@MurphysSlaw992 the best thing to do is to check out your local pawn shops, some of them don't know what they have and you can get some pretty awesome deals, I got a sigma 200-600mm and a 50mm for like $40, each lense has it's own purpose and you just gotta play with them to see what works for which situations
@@colosine There's a pawn shop right down the street from me that has a 50mm lens for just about 100 bucks cheaper than Amazon is asking, so this is definitely solid advice, thanks for replying!
This is one of the best and the most comprehensive videos out here. It takes enormous effort to put this much information together this well. Thank you very much!
bought my first DSLR 10 years ago. a Canon 550D with 18-200mm kit lens. love it. still use it today. last year i upgraded to a 5Ds from around the same build year. i have to say. i will never get rid of my 550D i learned so much on it before i eventually upgraded to full frame. when people ask me what is a good camera to learn on. especially if they are still unsure about photgraphy i recomend them early canon or nikon cameras such as the 600D or D3200. those cameras are dirt cheap on the second hand market and have all the manual functions which you need to learn how to expose properly. the fact that you can pick one up with a kit lens for under 200 euros these days is amazing. especially if you are just starting out and still deciding if photgraphy is for you. i also recomend getting some kind of free photo editing software and begin playing around with shadows and highlights, color tone etc. editing your shot is a big part about creating your art and getting a photo to look how you pictured it in your mind when you took the shot.
Great video. In 2007 I entered the digital world with an Olympus e-510. I soon moved to the e-5. I stayed with the brand because I have so many lens. I currently shoot an EM-1X. I’m so used to a cropped sensor because full frame didn’t exist back when I started. I have never seen the need to switch “up” to full frame. The 3 pictures I take in low light a year I use DXO to remove any noise. Mark is the best at explaining the benefits of any sensor size. My take is look at the cost of the body and the lenses. Size too. Size matters. My small systems weighs nothing. Nice job guys.
I bought two used Canon 7D and one 1D Mark IV with low shutter counts recently. I've been shooting wildlife as a hobbyist for last 13 years. I love these gems and know them well. They serve me very efficiently. No need to be concerned about new gears.
I currently use an old Canon 700d, which is okay but I am growing out of it. I have looked around at most of the options, tried a few out but for me it comes down to these factors. I already have money invested in Canon aps-c, that is four lenses, a flash, flash trigger, remote etc. So switching brands would be to expensive. I have tried mirrorless with evf's but I wear glasses and prefer DSLR's with out evf's. I tried Sony but I have reduced feeling in my fingers and kept pushing the lens release. So in the end I decided to go up to the Canon 90d, it's still a better camera than I currently have, but I can keep my lenses etc and it doesn't break the bank. In short be realistic and find the best camera for you that doesn't always mean having the best, brightest and most expensive camera just the best one for you.
Thank you. It's a great guide for people starting out with photography. I would like to add 3 points. 1. For still images even cheap basic 6 year old camera with any sensor size will produce images easily good enough for almost any situation. 2. Try to hold the camera that you are interested in getting. I've always chosen cameras that feel good in my hand. If you don't you are less likely to use the camera and won't have it well. 3. Don't forget the extras / accessories in your budget. E.g. memory card and reader.
I've been serious about photography for the past 17 years. I mostly shoot a Mamiya 7 or an RZ67. But if I had to start all over again, I'd get something like the Fuji X100V and keep it on manual modes until I learned how to see light and color the way my camera sees it. Putting your camera in any kind of "Auto" mode will cripple your learning experience. I learned on the RZ and would suggest that, but it's big and film is an extra thing nowadays. The X100V is not cheap, but it will last for years and be of good utility during that time . If you're going into this hobby without some commitment I suggest you turn back now. Buying the cheapest thing up front is a sign of low commitment.
Never ever be afraid of second hand and even antique! I once found a Konica AutiReflex T3 with two lenses in perfect working order in a local antique shop for $35
I started with a Nikon 70s, a 6 MP DSLR, and I used it for many years, developing myself from AUTO mode to M mode. My next one was a D300 and that was a big step. I still have it and shoot with it today. A few years later I bought a used D700, which I also still use. Then I started investing in some FX lenses and learned the difference between APS-C and Full Frame. For me it's not a question of quality, they both make great photos. It's how different they behave in the same situation, that was my learning project then. Recently I took another step and bought an APS-C Nikon Z camera, the fc to be precise. Now I'm learning how a mirrorless camera behaves and what it can do (including video that my DSLRs don't have). There is so much to learn all the time! I hope I get old enough to one day being able and switch to a full size sensor mirrorless, maybe a used Z9 or something similar. Photography is a big adventure, and it's really great to start with a small and simple camera to get into it. You can always make the next step when the time has come. Btw, I still have my D70s, it still works, takes nice pictures and I use it as a backup in case every other camera fails on me.
Hey at this moment, i have am using a D70s but the focus, no video, and many basic features that common these days are not in it, i just do casual photography and am gonna take classes on it and the camera was of my dad, sitting in bag for years so i just started taking more and more pics, it's been 2 years, and i have gotten a bit better but i am still pretty young at 16 years old and thinking about buying a Cannon MK II or Sony ZV e10 which one you think is better, but i think it will be a huge upgrade for sure
@@Justachamp772 I'm happy to hear that there are other people running the Earth who still use the D70s! I am not sure which Canon Mark II you aim on, there are several models who have Mk II in their model names. The Sony for sure is a big upgrade, make sure you buy a kit including a lens like for example the Sony E 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ OSS. I wish you all the best and a lifelong fun taking photos!
@@rakutzimbel4539 sorry m50 mk2 and thank you for the lens advice i will get one lens included but i need to learn more about them, cause i only use the one that came with it
@@rakutzimbel4539 i have taken over 10k pics with, i don't have any landscape place or travel at all outside my neighbourhood so i took pics of hotwheel cars, then they banned hotwheel cars in my country so now i take timer pics of myself, very hard to focus, low light perfomance was lacking, controls were a bit glichy that i can't always get a timer in very pic and have to change it every time but taling your own pic is hard as i didn't know shutter remote existed, but i want to make videos, self pics, macro shots, if i travel then landscape but most what that save my life was the tripod, i need it everywhere if i need more light in pics and no blur but focus sucks for sure, i am hyped to whenever i can get a chance to get any one of these, either a viewfinder one with good colours or better video, lowlight perfomance mirrorless will be a new experence
Just heard what I do actually know already - I’m into photography for about 14 years in a row and this is with DSLR’s. Yeah, only with Canon, but I like it :) The ergonomic of it is stunning (for me, compared to Nikon). Started with EOS 350D, then using 650D for several years bought 5D (classic). Again after about 5-6 years considered buying 5D Mark ii - for live-view experience with prime non-AF lenses as also for the new filming experience. Honestly, when you gained some experience with Crop camera and you feel you need the Full-frame than it’s going to be your next main camera: I really shoot with the 650D no more that often or better to say “quite rarely”. Wish all of you the best shots and to stay safe
Buy used, search classifieds, or look at camera shops for used cameras, you can frequently find them for hundreds off especially with older entry level dslrs
I bought a Canon EOS M50, so far it supports all my needs on producing quality videos..You are also right, it's really not on how expensive your camera is to take good photos and videos. This is great for beginners who looking for their first camera...Base on experience Canon M50 would be a great deal. Have a nice day!
Hi Marc, great video. As a beginner, I don't know other people so, as briefly mentioned at the start, I decided on a getting the best camera I could afford (that could also do video at 4k/60fps) I got a Panasonic S5 (£1400 with 20-60 mm lens and spare battery) my needs were for a general use camera thats good in low light and fast shutter speed and good quality video. its proved to be a great camera for me. I am a member of the school of photography and would highly recommend it to any beginner as not only will you learn so much, you will also find a great online community to help and support you, wherever in the world you are!
I am the "car guy" and "camera guy" in the office - people ask what they should buy. I always ask them - how much do you have to spend and what do you want to use it for? This video is perfect, the addition is to consider what you want to shoot- if want to take shots of their child doing indoor sports then autofocus ability and lens aperture will be more important - and they may need to save more or buy used. Thanks Marc - just joined the School of Photography today, time I paid back for the things I have learnt for free.
I have a Nikon D3500. Probably the best budget / beginners DSLR today. Especially for a 💩 photographer like me A viable purchase brand new here in Australia and a good array of lenses available A seriously absurd battery life rated at 1550 pictures but in real life ? It is wayyyyy beyond that Nothing else compares really
Having an experience actually helps in buying a new camera, its going to make you consider what specs or features that you need to have for the next camera and that's what this guy has been mentioning that when you are a first time buyer "ever" you start with a budget camera for you to not be disappointed on what the camera has in store for you and at the same time, you can discover yourself on what do you want to do with your camera. For tips, yes stick to your budget and this, compare cameras with the same price and try to choose what is best suited for you because every photographer or videographer have their biases and maybe you too so have a research before buying. Good luck!
Thanks, great video. Totally agree - a more expensive camera won’t make you a better photographer; understanding composition is far more important. Secondly, (and I’m not sure who’s quote this is), the best cameras is the one you’ve got with you when you want to take a photo. Make sure you get something that you’re happy to carry around.
I've arrived a bit late to the conversation. I started shooting basic film cameras back in the late eighties, and for a few years into the nineties, but I gave up on photography at the time. When the spark hit me again, everything changed, everything was new and shiny and megapixels were a thing. So, I did what any right minded person yearning for nostalgia would do, I bought one of these new contraptions. No interchangeable lens, just a super zoom bridge camera and thought to myself "Self, you will be the best photographer in the world now". So, that didn't pan out. About a month later, I hated the bridge camera. It was...ehh... alright for zooming in, but the options in the camera simply did not give me the control I wanted on the camera. Have you ever tried to adjust the focus manually on a bridge camera? it doesn't end well. So, I made the only rational choice I had available, I filed for divorce with the bridge. As it turns out, you don't need to hire a fancy lawyer to divorce a camera, you can just stick it back in its box and pretend it never happened. Like advantix film, and that library book you never returned. [I honestly wonder what my late fees are after twenty-eight years.] So, now with that entire pre amble out of the way, and the likely hood no one will read this, the actual story. I spent two months researching everything about modern digital photography, and began assessing what my needs actually were. What I wanted to do with photography in the short, as well as long term. So, my first round picks for cameras that functioned in the way I thought I needed were put aside. The Canon 5dmkII, Nikon D800, Sony A7R and S. All spectacular cameras, all cameras I knew all the spec sheets for... None of which would of done me any good at that time. [Not to mention they were all fairly new on the market, and cost prohibitive.] So, what I wanted, a camera I could hike with, a camera I could trust in bad weather, one that COULD get away with night photography when I wanted. Most importantly, one that I could afford realistically long term. I waffled between saving and buying one of the big fancy full frame cameras, got lost in fantasies about Medium Format. I was to the point of having fever dreams about cameras coming to take me to the insane asylum. I spent my entire downtime away from work researching cameras. At some point I began looking deeper into this whole contrived mythos built up around camera brands, features, bigger better, megapixel nightmare. Distilled it down, and realized, it's all subjective anyway. The ONLY person who is going to judge you for the camera in your hand is you. That's when I found it though, after all of this inane waffling of mine. A Fujifilm X-T1. It really captured my imagination, and made me feel nostalgic. It wasn't full frame, it didn't have a large lens ecosystem. It was mirrorless. At the time, I had no idea what any of that really meant anyway. I tried to rent the camera, no dice at that time. Then I went to a few local camera shops, and discovered they didn't have this mythical unicorn of a camera either. Finally, I just said to myself "Self, you are a world class photographer, buy that camera without ever laying hands on it!". Somehow, at the time, it made sense to me. So, I slapped my credit card down, and bought a camera. I think somewhere in the writing of this experience of buying a camera I had a moral in mind. If I really just condense this into a singular statement, it might read a little different. A camera is just a tool, just like a paint brush. A paint brush with buttons... and dials... and the end comes off...Ok bad metaphor.
Still using my d3200 from 9 years ago. Used to only shoot as a hobby but I’ve started using it for professional real estate photography and it’s more than capable for the job. I’m looking to add a full frame to my arsenal for the better depth of field and low light performance.
Two years later, could we have an update? Are you still using it? Is everything alright with your 3200? I'm considering getting the D3300 as my very first one.
@@JeffStark-uz6cd ive switched to the sony a7c. reason is the d3200 lacked a auto bracketing feature which I need for my real estate photos. you can get great deals on the a7c because the a7cii and the a7iv are out. get the exact same features as the a7iii but in a more compact body and better value. grabbed mine for $1200 used great condition. if you don't need crazy amounts of features or if your within a budget the d3000 series is still a top buy.
I was going to buy a camera to take pictures of nature views,I work on a boat so I like to take pictures of sunsets,the moon and other boats.this video was essential for me,I gain more knowledge about cameras and now I know what kind of camera I should get.Thank you school of photography for this video
I have an uncle who is a press photographer. He loaned me a few cameras to try to find what suits my needs. I ended up buying a CANON 2000D at about £350. I tried mirrorless but with a 100-300 mm zoom lens fitted the balance in the hand is horrible. So, No thanks. Canon also offers a range of lenses for all needs. Usually you get a 17-55 mm zoom supplied. Add a 50 mm F1.8 prime and a 55-200 mm zoom and thats about all you need. A pistol grip and a tripod are worth having and you still have a light camera bag.
there are more cameras that this doesn't apply to than systems it does apply to though. basically, Pentax/Canon efm/ and maybe the Nikon j series are about the main ones I can think of that will be very limited on lens choice. everything else these days is fairly safe to invest in.
Really well articulated overview of the main items to consider when looking to buy a camera. I went through the process about a year and a half ago. Decided on: Mirrorless, APS-C sensor, Canon. On the matter of budget I think one should examine the full range of gear wanted or perhaps needed i.e. bags to filters, extra batteries, etc. But don't forget items like editing software and will you need to travel to pursue you interest not to mention taking courses to help you learn? Great channel. Thanks. Oh, and lenses might be as important as the camera body.
Here is some great advise. Get yourself a used D5500 w/warranty think B&H, Adorama, etc. They are really cheap right now. It takes amazing pics. The lenses are also relatively cheap- get the nifty 50mm and the Nikor AF80-300mm and grab a nice Macro lens for fun. Then invest in a nice tripod like the 4 leg Leofoto. Pair that with a quality ball head. The quality of your gear matters. If you do panoramics (you should), get an indexing (clicking) pano head and a focus rail so you can compensation and limit parallax errors. Read some good books and fire away- in Manual or a priority mode and use the Raw format. Learn to edit using a program like Affinity Photo. I just got back from a trip out west and my pics came out amazing. I ordered some that are getting enlarged on metal- metalmouth does a great job. One of the best tips these books taught me was to go snap happy. Take 1,000+ pics- narrow down to ~100- edit those. Of the hundred find your top 10- print out your top 3! Especially with people, the best shots are not always when they pose- but before or after. With landscapes, use exposure compensation and use an ND filter as needed. There are only a few main techniques that can make your photos stand out. Almost the least important IMO is the actual camera. As long as it is 24MP or higher- the glass and your technique are much more important considerations. I am not a pro- just a Joe but I can finally take very decent pics. Last tip- if you have Amazon Prime, you can create completely FREE unlimited photo galleries. The site does not compress your image quality either and you can easily share galleries via a link. I have no idea why they don't market this- no one know about it and it's hard to find. From the "Main" home page- left side, click ALL>>>Digital Content>>>Amazon Photos. DONE. I have about 6 galleries- all free.
Wholeheartedly agree with starting with a budget camera rather than jumping the gun on an expensive one. My first camera was a Canon Rebel T5, and it taught me a lot of things - most importantly, it taught me that I HATED how big it was. I didn't take into consideration how big it was going to be at the time of purchase, but I found that carrying it around when I wanted to get into street photography was just not realistic. My assumption at the time was that if it was big and had a lot of buttons and dials, it was the better camera. Instead, the amount of buttons, coupled with my inexperience, caused me to be overwhelmed with options and led to a less enjoyable shooting experience. So after getting some practice in and realizing how much I did not like using a DSLR body, I went the completely opposite direction and bought myself a Ricoh GR II. Absolutely miniscule by comparison and had a fixed lens. That's when everything clicked for me - the limitation of the fixed lens and the portability of the GR II really allowed me to grow as a photographer, and I had a hell of a lot more fun too. I've since learned my preferences and have grown tremendously since those Canon T5 days. I now shoot with a Fujifilm X-E4, but I keep the Ricoh GR II with me when I still want something even smaller.
Size does make a huge difference in what you will want to use. I will say the cheaper model Canons are not intuitive or friendly. I have used the T models and do not like them at all. The 5Ds are much easier to get around. They are actually a little bigger and fit better in the hand. That being said, I really don’t enjoy carrying around a big camera and for video, I just like something like a DJI pocket or GoPro.
The most important thing is that most people only need a point and shoot camera. If you are well diverse in photography then you will know what you can afford and what you want to do with it . As a pro. most people don't know the difference between a f stop and a buss stop. The cell phone has taken over the industry. Photography is a trade ,last time I was in school of modern photography . 1960 . There is a lot to learn in this field. 🇨🇦 .
Two things I personally find important are weather resistance and image stabilisation. For those reasons I think the Olympus stands out above the rest, but for those for whom those points aren't relevant, your advice that the brand doesn't matter is certainly on the mark. There are really no bad cameras today.
The only thing to consider I missed in video is ergonomy - how the camera feels in your hands, how easy is to handle it. Just go to the camera shop and ask for cameras within range of your budget and take every camera in your hands - the differences are huge... But maybe this is important only for me :-) Anyway - great video!
Pentax is amazing beginner camera. Durable, weather resistant, in body image stabilization, - no other brand offers that bang for buck that pentax does.
I'm no professional photographer or really a photographer at all but I have taught myself how to take photos. I usually try to take pictures of animals but I almost never get a good photo but that's just how animal photography goes but I somehow got an amazing picture of one of my dogs and used one of windows free photo editor and slightly changed the contrast and made it look 100x better.
I started photography a couple of years ago. I did some research online & although still expensive to me, I opted for the entry level Nikon D3500. I had no idea what I was buying but the reviews were consistent in their praise for the camera. A couple of years on & I have to say I love it. I've gone through the stage of just photographing anything & everything in sight & am now starting to find areas of interest. I'm now using manual mode more often than not & can see improvement in my shots. The camera is great value & takes good quality images. I have the 'kit' lenses - 18-35 & 70-300mm and last year I bought a prime 50mm lens which I love using for night time street photography. On the advice of a SoP video; I bought lens hoods for my 'kit' lenses & that really helps improve daytime shooting. As the D3500 is entry level, the only thing I can say is that when shooting at night, the ISO doesn't cope well above 1600. Up to that point, the image quality is still very good but the next available option is 3200 & the quality is pretty rough. I'm sure more expensive cameras can cope better but for what I'm using the camera for, I can't praise the D3500 enough. I find it easy to use, especially as there is plenty of help available online or in manuals. The 50mm prime lens was also great value at around £150. It's unlikely I'll get to the stage where I can spend big bucks on a camera or lenses as the entry level was a big outlay for me. I'm just glad that I can still get great quality images and learn photography skills with a camera of entry level standard. (When I say great quality images, I mean the camera's image quality, I'm not blowing my own trumpet! 😁)
Excellent video I'm now the owner of 3 nikon cameras it's an amazing hobby. You will learn to see the world around you and yourself in very different ways. Hobby photography for me has become a form of therapy and I'm grateful for it.
I've been working as a professional photographer for over 30 years and I still use a Canon EOS 40D It's taken over 100,000 images, it's had 1 main circuit replacement and it still does a great job.
If you really want to enter photohraphy and I mean photography not video, and do something more than with your phone, go for these: Canon 5d mk 1,2,3, 6d Nikon d600, 610, 700,750...or sony or pentax or whatever FF. And a 50mm 1.8 lens. All you need. And when you get bored, you will easily sell it. If however, you stay in the photography world, and decide to get better gear, or maybe take it to the next level, then you can think of making a bigger budget and then get something new. And then first, start building lens arsenal, lens is much more important than the newest body with it's options. Also you need to learn how to use PS and Lightroom.
I would personally recommend a second hand past generation model. Often coming with one or two lenses, extra batteries, etc… so to get a kit to start. It’s only after practicing and learning that you will understand what your needs are. Therefore not worth spending too much on first camera kit. It could result being your first love but probably not the last one. And in case photography does not interest you anymore, than you have not lost too much money
I've personally gotten canons 50mm stm for resonably cheap second hand. And after maybe 3 years realised how not terrible the kit 18-55mm lense is. You really don't need any kit (except the camera + a battery and a lense) if you're a beginner.
100% agree with that. Even if you are like myself that did photography, but wanted to get into the DSLR and away from a film camera, I picked up a very good 2nd hand Nikon D7000 with the kit lense for around $600. Added a few more lenses to the stable plus all the other goodies like extra batteries, flash, remote flash, etc.....
M50m2, 18-150mm zoom is an fantastic combination for me. The camera can do just about anything I want to shoot with image quality good enough for an A2 print. One point I would mention but has nothing to do with the camera itself is to invest into a decent but simple to use photo editor package. IMO this is an absolute MUST with digital photos and will easily triple your shooting yield by being able to crop and thus concentrate more on the subject, cut away unwelcome intrusions at edges, level out the horizon or straighten vertical lines, adjust contrast, brightness, saturation and add sharpening. The editor I use cost me 60USD but yields excellent results. There a few available at roughly that price and most have a free trial period.
To add, I had a Canon Powershot 560HS, which is a bridge camera. The zoom range was phenomenal but eventually I got disillusioned by the limited F stop range, 2.5 stops at best, 1 stop at worst, the poor dynamic range (1.2/3 sensor IIRC), and having no touch screen. These were the reasons to buy an M50 and I am now more than happy with it.
Marc summed this up perfectly and I think a majority of us all make the same silly mistake of thinking that a particular camera will make you better but believe me it doesn’t. Budget is normally key when buying your first camera, more so at the beginning because you want to buy everything else that goes with it! If you can, try to narrow down your shortlist and then try and hold the camera as well to make sure it feels comfortable in your hand. When you buy into a system you tend to stick with it so it’s well worth making sure it’s what you really want so if it does seem too expensive then do consider used from a reputable company or camera store because these will all come with a warranty.
I have a mirrorless and I agree with you the real time aspect is missing. Its not always fun to view through the screen especially when you want to see the image immediately. My next camera is going to have mirrors.
I ended up with a choice of canon or Nikon at 500 notes with very similar spec , I chose the Nikon over the canon due to the feel in the hand when using it and neglected that it did not have an intervalometer or mic socket on it . In all honesty I haven't missed those as much as I initially thought after I came home and am truly impressed with the Nikon . Mpb , ffordes and lce are really handy for getting second hand quality lenses etc rather than running the risk of a complete stranger on a bidding site .
Absolutely top advice! I have always bought used from the well known companies and have saved a lot of money. The major ones always give at least 6 months guarantee, so that gives peace of mind. I have printed to A3 from the cheapest and I am perfectly satisfied. Keep up the good work!
I started off with the Nikon D3300 which I purchased online as someone I knew had one and found it easy to use, Mine had been used purely for video, so the shutter count is low. The only downside for me was its size as i have small hands. I saw a video on TH-cam featuring the Fujifilm X-T1 and liked the size and the layout of the buttons. The crazy thing is, this is a professional level camera that paired with a kit lens you can get for less than the price of an entry level camera off the high street. The mega pixel level is lower but the features are great and sites like MPB and LCE (London Camera Exchange) test and warranty all their cameras.
My first experience with SLR was a Manuel Pentax K1000. With it, I gained a good understanding of aperture, shutter speed and ISO. Some years later I stayed with the same brand DSLR K30. It's solid and I don't expect to outgrow it anytime soon.
Never experienced the solenoid problem? From what I've heard, it seems to ruin most of the K30s, K50s and K500s after 10 - 20k exposures. OTOH, if that happens, you can get a used K2 for about 200 quid today and keep your lenses.
Another thing, maybe not that important to some, is how the camera feels and the colour science. I have the Fujifilm X-T4, and have used Fuji due to the colour science and I love the feel and look of the camera.
I was gifted a Nikon D5100 and it's what I'm learning on. It won't last long since the older lenses are harder to find but it's working really well for me.
You have literally decades of lenses available (just the really oldest ones, made for film, may have no autofocus but can still mount them and manual focus with them). I am buying a used d7200 right now because I made all comparisons and it's basically same picture quality, more features and cheaper and has TONS and TONS of more lenses than any mirrorless out there atm. Sure don't spend thousands on lenses so you don't lock yourself in the ecosystem, but you can do several years with that camera. If you really outgrow it (doubtful, but say you're the 1% that really becomes advanced) it means you will want a full frame anyway so no matter the system that will be new lenses as well. I am only upgrading as I had a d50 which is a 6mp 2005 system with slower and less accurate focus and I really kind of need to at this point. My oldest lens is a 1987 35mm fixed focal length I got off ebay to experiment with.
Great information for those about to buy there first camera. The only thing i would add is that if like me you want to do wildlife phtography it is a good idea to pick a camera with a reasonably fast fps otherwise it is incredibly hard with fast moving animals.
I am new to photography. Thank you for your very informative video, one of the best on TH-cam. I love wildlife and Landscape. I Currently have a Bridge camera( Lumix) but find I am not getting the images I want( its probably me and not the camera). I now want an interchangeable lens camera, but which one? So many to chose from. I will continue with my Lumix fz82 for now, but can't wait to upgrade.
I have done photography from the early 8os starting with a Minolta 300, then to Minolta Autofocus models to eventually Sony digital. For the simple reason it used the Minolta lenses, now I use the original A7 and an A 6000. Both do all I need and more and reason went Sony was I could keep my Minolta lenses with an adapter, you don’t need latest or best I still use Minolta lenses. Buy what you can afford and take loads of photos keep away from fully auto and use manual or one of the priority settings. Most of all take plenty of photos that’s most important thing.
I'm glad I found this video. Back in the 90's my dad spent a few thousand dollars on a Minolta Maxxum 7000 and 4 lenses. He used it about a dozen times and forgot about it. Just before he passed, he asked me if I wanted the camera, knowing I was considering getting into photography. I of course was more than happy to accept it. It was in rough shape. The batteries had been left in the frame, the flash and others in a side pocket. Needless to say the camera is unusable, but the lenses were in their own pouches and in perfect condition. I had read that Sony a cameras can accept these Minolta AF lenses. I am now looking to buy my first camera and would like to make use of these lenses. Is the a6000 or another in that series, right for using these lenses?
This is an impressive video. I appreciate the balance and the nuance. There is no perfect solution for every situation and everyone really needs to accept this up front. For instance, sensor size is correlated with the capacity to gather light and ‘dynamic range.’ The reviewed cameras are ‘referenced’ to a 35 mm sensor (itself related to 35 mm film) but there are larger cameras to be had as well - Hasselblad makes a fine medium format digital ‘back’ that totally eclipses the light gathering of the best 35 mm digital sensor. But one would be hard pressed to use the Hasselblad in fast moving sports environments. And it’s expensive. I’ve shot the Minolta SRT 101 (my first film camera) and the Nikon F4 (also film), and the cropped sensor Nikon D90 and the full format Nikon D610, as well as the very nice (for people pictures) Fuji X100T. Most post-processing in Adobe Lightroom. I own DX and FX lenses for the Nikon system, some of them pro lenses, like the amazing 24-70, and the 200 mm micro lens. That said, all of this kit is frigging heavy to carry. Sure, I can pack the Nikon 24-70 (very heavy) and the Nikon 70-300 (ok lens) and have a full frame/full format range from 24 at the wide to 300 at the telephoto. I can toss my Really Right Stuff tripod into the trunk as well. And the … and the … and the … I feel like I need a Sherpa to tag along. Or, I can bring along the Sony RX 10 IV, which has a decent one inch sensor, a 25x fixed super telephoto lens with some wide at the short end (think 24-600 mm) and some macro capacity. It shoots in RAW and has decent fast action and slow mo options, shoots video, has a good grip handle, and is light to hold or carry! They say this is a ‘bridge’ camera, but at my age, carrying all the kit is not worth the greater dynamic range. As the gentleman says, if you can’t take a good picture with what is available, the camera equipment won’t help. Weight vs. low light/dynamic range/ vs. wide angle when needed vs. super-zoom telephoto when needed vs. ISO without noise vs. shutter speeds to stop action vs. good bokeh (the creaminess of the background that blurs together when tightly focused on something) … all important qualities, but not all of these are important all the time.
So I was on my photography project with a friend. He had an expensive camera and I had a cheap 10 year old canon. I had learned some basics of photography at college and let me tell you, having a camera that has more options to mess around with is super fun and did end up in better photos. It's unfair that I am comparing my $170 camera to his camera that was 10 times has expensive, but he didn't have any skills so i benefited
Great informative video. Thanks. I bought a NIKON D3300 - 24 mp in 2015 my first DSLR camera with just the kit lens of 18-55. I still have it and have never got round to getting any other lens for it ( not sure what would be the best one to get anyway - maybe you can advise). I have used it an awful lot and I get great images from it. I am only a hobby photographer anyway. Depending on where I am and what I am photographing I mostly used manual settings but still now and then revert to Auto No flash or sometimes just use a few of the built in effects for fun the only trouble with those is you have no control with settings using those. I tended to use flash quite a lot as well but don't do at present as I think there is now a loose wire/connection in it as it doesn't always go off unless I am lucky enough for the camera to maybe be tilted a bit in the right direction so the connection is being made inside for it to just go off just once, then it won't go off again. It really needs to be mended but I am thinking that it would cost too much to get sorted for what the camera is now worth now. I have seen a TH-cam video on how you can pull the flash apart to sort the wires out inside but I am reluctant to do so as it looks quite fiddly and am fearful of making things even worse as it is the only camera I have. Any suggestions as to what would be a good plug on flash unit to get instead maybe a ring one or something else to compensate for the built in flash not always working.. I really don't know where to start with that kind of stuff. Apart from my little flash problem I really love this camera and would like some advise if I were to upgrade which would be a reasonable one to go far as would like a better zoom but really don't want to have to keep changing lenses or carrying more of them with me. I also love macro but don't use this setting on the camera as I don't think it makes any difference as you can only get so close to a subject before it won't focus anyway. So I usually just crop the image afterwords and have still managed to get quite a lot of detail on those images although it probably wouldn't be quite as detailed as you can get using a dedicated macro lens it is still pretty good. Sorry for rambling on any advice from anywhere is welcome.
I am also "only" a hobby photographer, and I have no intention of ever venturing into the professional world. It's doesn't make you an inferior photographer.
I'm not a professional photographer either. I have a Canon 4000d. I recommend you buy the cheapest 50 mm (portrait) and 24 mm (nature, city, wide angle) lenses, if Nikon has them.
Already deep rooted into the Lumix G9. Doing a gender reveal with it next week with 10-25 1.7, 42.5 1.7 prime, 12-60mm, 50-100mm, Godox AD200 Pro, ND Filters, etc. 🥲 by summer, I might upgrade to full frame. R6 or S1R. I've done 2 weddings with my G9 as a second shooter, a Bat Mitzvah, and some Christmas photo shots. I feel like I can juice out my G9 for a while, and yes planning to keep the baby for long run for social media purposes and video content. But for higher end stills, definitely looking between S1R, R6 or R5 or A7R IV. God willing. But until then? Enjoying leica technology at a good price with Panasonic. Thank you for the video.
Bought my first ever camera the Panasonic Lumix GX80 w/ G.vario 12-34mm lens last month. For me it's the perfect camera because though it's a bit old it has the features I need. It produces sharp pictures and can shoot 4K videos if I want to. I'm still learning maybe if I'm a bit more experienced and confident I'll upgrade to a full format or APSC camera.
As a pro photographer, I totally agree with your vid. You will have helped a lot of beginners to choose the correct beginner's camera. Personally, I shoot Nikon D pro cameras I now photograph landscapes here in Scotland. For years I lugged a huge camera bag full of huge Nikon bodies and lenses plus as you said a heavy-duty tripod. by the time I climbed the path to The Old Man of Storr, on The Isle of Skye it took me 20mins and a cup of tea to get into some state of recovery haha. Then I discovered a little gem that broke all the said rules of pro photography. I stumbled across marcus pix vlog on the Panasonic G100 M4/3rds camera that Panasonic had launched as a vlog camera and was totally slated on some vlog vids. Marcus proved that this tiny little camera instead of being a vlog camera was in actual fact a damned fine stills and video camera capable of using a myriad of different makes of lenses. So I bought into this system discovering that this tiny camera is related to some of the top of the range Panasonic Pro cameras similar to the G9 and above but with the latest software upgrades. My landscapes are rarely printed above A4 they appear in calendars and magazines so ISO is never a problem the 20MB sensor is excellent at picking up the images. the biggest plus for me is my camera and associated lenses fit into a 15in by15in by 5in plastic waterproof case that I don't even notice I'm carrying. BTW weight is now a big factor for me I'm 70 years young and have MND the G100 suits me down to the ground and yes it still takes me ages and a cup of tea to recover from the climb to The Old Man of Storr.
Best camera (bag) is the one user can carry as often and to as many places as possible and not brand/religion icon collection sitting on shelf. What is claimed as photography community is really religion club as full of fundamentalists as Saudi government...
I'm not an experienced photographer, but I've been making pictures for a few years now. My only tip would be: People think they need something better, but it's their skills which needs to be better. You can even take really good pictures with cheap cameras.
What a video man, astonishing. I have watched so many videos but your content is just simple and self explanatory. I should have watched this video first hand . Good work man, cheers.
I've been doing photography for 12 years. I had a Nikon D3100 to start off with. I then got a D7000 and used that for 9 years. I just recently bought a used D500. I never needed a full frame camera. I never felt like my photography would have improved with full frame. But the last few months I've really gotten into my photography again and want to start posting and sharing my results so I will probably be looking at upgrading to the next generation of full frame mirrorless cameras. I should have waited. I think I learnt about photography and used the camera as a tool and only replaced it when I knew I had outgrown it. But yeah, you can get some great shots with very little gear. the gear is not the most important part. the enjoyment of photography and getting out to shoot is the only important part. But learning how to use the camera as a tool to be comfortable with it is also important.
Only 3.5 yrs of photography here after starting at 47 yrs old which started with a fujifilm s6500fd for the first couple of months, and then purchased canon's entry level 200d with 18-55mm and 55-250mm lens bundle, plus a bag, sd card and cheapest tripod I could get. Have since added an extra battery, Tokina 14-20mm lens, sigma f1.4 30mm and upgraded to a far better tripod plus a levelling base and nodal rail, all of this has me covered from milky way nightscapes with the Tokina to night street with the sigma 30mm and general scenes and local sports with the kit lenses. My upgrade will only be to a 90d or secondhand 5dmk4, when that will be I don't know but either will see me through what ever happens next.
Are you happy with your choice of the Canon 90D? I'm considering that one for my 1st interchangeable lens camera. Have previously used bridge cameras. I most enjoy shooting birds and wildlife. Is it a beast to carry?
Marc, I still own and use the first camera I bought it's a Canon 50d I bought, I bought it New, magnesium alloy body semi- pro they called it, I had a New shutter mechanism recently, great camera , I think you can get them fairly cheaply these days , I would say the downside is the use CF cards , far more expensive than SD card ,and you have to be gentle putting the card in, lots of pins to bend if your careless 15.5 mpx, the largest I print to is A4, loads of lenses for them EF & EFS both work well on the crop sensor , I like the white balance control on it on the K setting, another downside is no video unless you put magic lantern software in it , not for me though, hope this helps anyone
It's only been 3 weeks since I've got my first camera sony a6400 . It would still take time for me to get the hang of it but the features have amazed me . I feel I made the right choice, it's a semi-proffesional camera and absolutely dynamic with the use .
Such a lovely and informative video. I seriously got so hooked to this video, I can't appreciate it enough for keeping it so clean and right to the point. You sir have gained a subscriber! Again, I loved the video a lot!
Very informative video, but one thing I would add is what you plan to do with the camera in the future, if you are going to be shooting wildlife, taking portraits, etc the availability of lens that you might want to purchase in the future. For example there aren’t as many lens available for micro 4/3rds as there are for Nikon F mount.
Very sensible advice. Additionally, don’t get caught up in megapixel obsession. All the crop-sensor and micro 4/3 cameras have more than enough resolution. *(My first digital DSLR was a Panasonic L1; its now-laughable 7 megapixels was fine for 8x10 and even 11x14 prints.) One more comment: Consider your first DSLR or mirrorless camera as a temporary learning tool; after 3-5 years, you’ll know enough to decide whether you want to get a more sophisticated camera or keep your starter camera and upgrade with lenses.
I started with a "hand me down" 35mm film dslr Canon AE-1. Even learned to process my own film when I had it. Had it for a long time. Then I had a Canon T-3i because it was all I can afford at the time. Then switched to a refurbished Canon 5D Mark III until it stopped working. I recently purchased Canon R8 using my old EF lenses with an EF-RF lens. I'm happy with my R8.
My Canon M50 has been really nice for what I've used it for, but more and more I'm less on the photography side and more on the videography side, so I kind of wish I had bought a M6MKII for the dual pixel AF in 4K. It's still a great budget option, though the lens mount isn't going to be getting much love from Canon going forward. If you have the money, getting something with a RF mount is a better long term decision. Going with Sony is also a pretty good move, since they don't seem to want to abandon the E mount like Canon is with EF-M.
@@dynamicdestination Short answer is no. And TBH putting RF glass on an M50 would defeat the purpose of having a compact camera body in the first place. I see absolutely no reason to try to adapt RF glass when you have a number of great lenses in the EF-M line (The Sigma trio, the 11-22mm, the 32mm F1.4 etc). If I had RF glass money, I'd have an RF body to mount it to, and I can't think of any reason to go through the trouble to adapt a lens to a camera that would not be able to use the control ring.
@@LunarGlowMedia Thank you very much for answering me... And I asked for RF lenses because I don't have problems in future. My dream camera is R6 and in future, I will buy it.And that's why I asked, so that I can buy lenses from now on that will work well with the R6. I know that F lenses will also work with the adapter but this needs to be updated with the times to come. That's why I want to invest one time...
As a beginner split the budget between training ( photography and photoshop) and good used equipment from a reputable dealer, once you have enough knowledge save to get what you want, lenses first then body, buy well once and don’t get caught up in chasing the latest and greatest gear.
My question as a beginner is if it is really worth buying a camera instead of taking pictures with my iPhone, as I mainly take them when traveling or doing trips. 🤔
This is the perennial question. For the iPhone, it is convenient (and light) and takes impressive photos. If your use is primarily a quick photo which you want to share with others easily and quickly, then there is no reason whatsoever to buy a camera. Most folk who use an iPhone as their ‘camera’ don’t care about the rationale around choosing a camera. Where I am going is that if you are a beginner and want to improve your use of the iPhone as a camera, there are excellent tutorials out there to do just that. All that said, you are shooting in a compressed format, so every image you take is somewhat limited with what you can do with the image, that is, in post-processing, as a way to improve or correct errors. But even saying this suggests that post-processing is something you would want to do! I love this aspect of photography, but didn’t love the darkroom during the film era. As for printing, I am unwilling to invest in a high-enough quality color printer, so if I have images I do want printed, I send them out to a pro shop. The obvious three upsides to a ‘camera’ as opposed to a iPhone are (1) the capacity to shoot in RAW, so as to gather every single bit of light, (2) a larger lens and a larger digital sensor to capture more detail and more ‘dynamic range,’ and (3) the capacity to get all of this with a super-telephoto, like on the Sony RX 10 IV.
Watching this because looking to get back to photography. My last DSLR was the Olympus E-620 great handling, really like the skin tones, and serviceable lenses. Alas the electronics have gone belly up. Something similar would be nice.
I bought the nikon 3500 which was great for getting my head round the basic controls but couldn't stop myself buying the the D7500 because I enjoyed photography so much I wanted a camera that would challenge me more on the tech side as well. these are both crop senses so not too expensive ?. good info in vid
Hi Ashwin . The image quality is a step up due to the better sensor I think .ie Colours and sharpness.. plus the feel and learning to use a more top end camera. . Better lenses does make a difference too.
Just bought my camera yesterday, and saw this today 🙂 Good tips in this video, but I would add that if you are looking for a second hand camera, then check witch brand is represented most in your area. This will give you a adwance both in price and to find just that model you are looking for. Here in Denmark, in the range I was looking in, it was clear thatthe Sony a6000 models were best represented. So that is what I went with, and when I start looking for a second Lens, there should be plenty to choose from. Great video, thanks, just subscribed
What you intend to photograph decides what camera you need to buy. Personally I have a quality non DSLR that slips into my pocket for convenience. I have a big chunky DSLR with big heavy lenses for serious work and a lighter version for travel.
One tip that's missing: Leave at least two thirds of your budget for lenses. The kit lens that mostly goes with the body is ok for a start but will leave you frustrated in the long run. A good lens, if bought brand new, will easily cost you three or four times the price of the body. Also, if you don't like to buy used gear, choose a system with a living ecosystem. That leaves Canon R (full frame), Sony Alpha with E-mount, Nikon Z, Panasonic Lumix S (full frame), Fujifilm X (crop only), OM Systems (ex-Olympus, MFT) and of course Pentax for those who love "true" DSLRs. Everything else has been abandoned or will be soon. Careful with Canon, too, as they have closed their systems for third-party manufacturers, which means that beautiful and affordable lenses from Sigma, Tamron and the like won't be available anymore for users of newer Canon systems. On the other hand, 2nd hand markets are full of cheap gear for "vintage" systems, but as has been said, there's always a risk.
when i started to look for something better than a point and shoot box (still in analog times) i looked for works of great photographers hat took photoes with a style i would like to take too, and imagined the equipment and features neccessary to create a similar shot. Based on this i loooked for the camera options with the feature set i wanted. Then picked based also on available expansion options for my use case (lenses), brand reputation, price budget - and if there is an additional top model in the same line (maybe for future a-camera, that would be compatible to the same line of lenses). Then i started saving money... However i think You must think different if you are sure to ditch this learning camera after a short time, or if You consider keeping it for several years of usage.
The greatest photographers all used Leica rangefinders with a fixed 35 or 50 mm lens, because it was the best and most resistant the could buy at their time.
my first camera was a nikon 5100 (second hand) and i absolutely loved it. im not a professional, but the manual mode was very comfortable to use. It has a simple interface, sadly i had the problem about the cables for transfering the fotos. it is an old model, so many computers couldn't read my camera and i had to take out the memory itself, and if the memory got damaged, i just lost all the fotos on it. Sadly about a week ago i went to venice and someone stole my beloved camera (thats why im checking what to buy next), but i really wish i could get the same or a similar one.
More like "you got 10 tabs open in your browser and found a single negative review in each of them leading you not even to consider any of the cameras" that's me. 🤣
Yeap 😂
Someone gave a macro lens 1 star because it didn't make much difference and they helpfully included a picture and it was a landscape shot
@@therabbithatloll
@@therabbithati actually laughed out loud at this. Its so ridicilous and a true depiction of modern people 😂
You literally did not address anything about the best beginner camera...you made the water more muddy. Horrible video
Finally… Someone who understands that when we're not a professional, it's all about the budget.
👍
Exactly this. I so dislike that whenever lower budget options are discussed, some brand fanboys always chime in with the sage advice to "just get the latest top-of-the-line model for 4.000 bucks, it's totally worth it, just start saving!" It's like, nope. I love photography, but at the end of the day it's a frivolous hobby for me, and since I'm not wealthy I absolutely can't justify dropping that amount of cash on it, even if I had it which I don't.
THings to consider: 1. Budget 2. Better build quality 3. FUlly manual and can change lenses. 4. Size of camera (micro 4:3 is smaller/lighter) 5. Image quality (smaller sensor sizes are fine if not printing massive prints) 6. Brand 7. Filming or not filming 8. Brand new vs. 2nd hand
Time stamps in the video description 👍
9. Manual mode with auto ISO
Sorry to barge in, but I think there's another thing to consider at the top of the list : the price of the additional glass. You buy an interchangeable lens camera because you intend to change lens. (If not, go for a bridge). So the price of the other lenses you will add to your system becomes extremely important in the decision process. Usually the price of the nifty fifty one's almost bound to buy at some point is a good indication of how expensive the system is compared to the competition.
hello, can a beginner use a fujifilm camera as a start?
@@maryammaryam2689 Yes, absolutely. Actually the very first camera I bought getting back into photography was a Fujifilm XT1 seven or eight years ago. However, be aware because they use a different sensor than...well everyone, you may want to look into alternate editing programs. It's all a learning experience!
That's how you do it. You encourage and enable people, you ease them in, and you don't make them feel like the craft demands of them something other than their desire to learn. Good on you bro, I appreciat you.
So true. I'm put off a lot by some of the more stuck up pros.
My advice when getting a first camera is to just get the body and a cheap kit lens that covers a wide zoom range. Forget things like image quality, Image stabilization, and aperture for now. As you use that kit lens, you'll start to get a feel for what kind of photos you take most frequently and then you can start looking for lenses that fill those roles. That way you don't end up splurging on a super expensive piece of gear just to end up never using it.
hey there, I appreciate this tip. I think it is easy to get a little over-zealous to start out. That said, there are still so many dang options it's hard to choose. Any brand/model you might recommend? I am more familiar with Nikon and Canon brands, though admit I am a complete newbie with hopes to become proficient in nature/architectural photography. Thanks in advance.
@@bernardoguevara1058 I use the Canon 60D and started out with the 18-135 IS kit lens. (Skip to the end if you want the meaty bits) The wide zoom range allowed me to figure out which zoom ranges I shot most in, which is wide angle to portrait. I also noticed that I lacked low light capabilities due to a narrow aperture (f3.5-5.6). I used the Canon 50mm macro for low light since it went down to f2.5, but it wasn't image stabilized and the autofocus was slow. I considered all these factors and picked up the efs 17-55mm f2.8 for my next lens, which covers all of the mentioned issues I was having and I am very pleased with it.
Now to the important bit. I would recommend a Canon 70D if this is your first camera, and its age means that good examples are 400-500 dollars. I recommend it over the 60D as it has double the autofocus points, autofocus when shooting video, in camera image processing, and a whole bunch of other improvements which I think makes the extra 100 dollars (60D is about 300) worth it. If you want to go the same route I did, you can pick up an 18-135 IS (non STM version) lens for around 200 USD. Don't bother with the STM version as you likely won't get any use out of its features when you're starting out, and you'll have grown out of it by the time those features would become useful.
If you want an even lower price, a used Canon Rebel with a kit lens can go as low as 300 dollars. The downside is that you'll probably grow out of the body really quickly and find yourself seeking an upgrade.
Remember to look at used and refurbished gear first. You can get some excellent deals in that area (I got my 17-55mm for 550 refurbished when it would've cost 900 new). Good used gear websites are keh and mpb as they offer 180 day warranties on their products in case something breaks.
Excuse me for the wordy reply, and best of luck! :)
@justinhung9394 Justin, thanks a million for taking the time to break it down for me. I'm diligently researching, with cost in mind, and hoping to find something soon. Getting tired of this lol.🙏🏼What are your photography interests btw?
@@bernardoguevara1058 I'm just a hobbyist so I shoot just about anything, although I find myself leaning towards nature, wildlife, and city/landscapes.
that's great, man. This is what I am hoping to get into myself@@justinhung9394
I've been shooting for over 50 years and still use an "entry level camera. I switched from film to digital with a Nikon D50 about 2005. I've since moved up to a D3300. It may not do everything I'd LIKE it to do, but it does everything I NEED it to do. I can work around the features it doesn't have. For a beginner, I believe learning those workarounds will make them a better photographer.
One good reason to not spend everything in the budget on the initial camera purchase is because there will be other things to buy. For starters, a second battery; if you want to shoot much video, consider a third and a fourth battery. Then there is the customary -uv filter to protect the lens; you don't want to get the cheapest one you can get unless you love soft focus. Maybe you'll want a second lens. Sooner or later your going to want a tripod. The list goes on and on.
Thanks for sharing Rick 👍
Hi Rick. I would love to see your work. Can you share your social media profile link. I would visit your profile
Thank you. What one would you personally recommend to start on?
@@patrycjaw8323 Simple question, not so simple answer. Just about anything with interchangeable lenses will work for you, but specifics depend on what you want to do with it. A body, a long zoom and a short zoom will probably do 90+% of anything you might want to photograph. It largely boils down to how much you have in the budget. But don't spend your entire budget on the camera. There will be odds and ends that can add up a fast. A bag to carry and protect your gear. An extra battery is a good thing. Filters, a tripod... there are any number of things you'll find you want/need.
I prefer my cameras to be made of metal, this is the primary reason I wouldn’t be seen dead with a Entry-Level camera. Rather than a Entry-Level digital camera, I would rather use a second-hand Nikon FM2N SLR.
As a novice photographer myself, I think there is also great use to actually learning how to properly set your camera for what you need it to do. The more you know the ins and out of your camera, the better you will get.
Good advice Ben 👍
I bought some very nice DSLR gear from KEH, and for very little money. Way more tech than I need.
Overall great video. Being a professional photographer I appreciate how you guys give out great advice to beginners. My advice: A quality lens should be a consideration, it makes a huge difference. If I was just beginning in photography, my steps would be to find the best second hand high quality lens and match it with a budget body. I purchased my Canon 70-200 2.8L on craigslist very reasonably and have used it on several bodies and still use it on a mirrorless Sony today. So think of lenses first because they are the engine of your camera.
Thanks for sharing Lonnie 👍
Which sony lens do u recommend for newbbies?
@@jkwakopo I have the 24-105mm f4 Sony, all around good for wider shooting with minimal distortion.
Lonnie is spot on. I have terrific pro lenses which will last the test of time. The camera body will advance in tech and features, but the lens will be sharp forever if it was best in class when you obtained it. Even so, Canon people stay Canon people because they buy.bought Canon lenses for Canon bodies. I am a Nikon user so I mostly stay within that world. If you are heading for a bridge camera with a single fixed lens then this makes no difference.
I'm guessing the brand of lense is not interchangeable with brand or body? So the lense brand is what you will get for the rest of the camera?
I was borrowed a Canon 400D by my uncle once he saw I showed interest in photography. I Never looked back since. The first camera I bought was a Canon 2000D and for a entry level camera this won me a couple of photo competitions. I feel this is a awesome beginner camera for the price and the quality it can produce. I have upgraded since though but the experience and knowledge the entry level brought me made me feel I deserved the upgrade.
Thanks for sharing this 👍
Lent*
@@joshuabranovsky40 LOL
Great to hear. I have just gifted my 400d to my 11 year old grandson. Hoping he will take the time to learn the basics. School photography class and a manual 🤞
Thank you so much for this
A long time ago I bought a refurbished Canon 450D with the 18-55mm kit lens, just recently pulled it out again, charged the battery up, and it works perfectly - I love it!
"For learning photographers...start off with a budget camera."
Literally the best advice I've ever heard someone say in one of these videos. And I wholeheartedly agree and make this same recommendation whenever someone asks me about getting an actual camera to start learning the craft.
That said I would like to point out that 4k 60p is not super common in mid to lower range cameras and even when it is can take up a lot of space, so make sure you have a lot of storage space to work with the files in your video editing software of choice, because you will need room for the footage plus the render, and you will usually be rendering in 24p anyways so 4k 30p at 8 bit recording is absolutely more than enough for most people. And if you find yourself wanting to do a lot more slow motion video, then your needs are above the normal creators and you should look into more specialized hybrid cameras.
Besides that one caveat I can safely say this is the only video I will be recommending to new photographers who ask me about cameras. As per usual you are absolutely bang on about everything here.
Just, muah, chef's kiss a perfect explanation for beginners looking to get into the medium of photography.
Thanks Fi :)
Couldn't agree more Marc. I started off with a canon 4000d, £300 with kit lens and it blew me away with what it could do. Then 850d, then 7d mark 2 and built up to a sony A7R3. If I started with the Sony A7R3 to begin with I probably would of given up because of how complicated the sonys can be to use. I'm no professional but I started off low end and simple and built up steady and took my time.
I have a question I'm now taking my channel more seriously. I have a logitec brio web cam, should I invest in in a dslr now or just upgrade my set ( meaning was decore desk backdrop sign etc) the logitec brio does 1080p at 60fps and 4k at 30fps but it's a web cam. Help please
@Craig Robinson Hi Craig, did you buy 2nd hand or brand new? I'm new to photography and could really use the advice. Thanks
@@misscee6629 it doesn't really matter if its brand new or second hand. But if you go for second hand i would never get any camera with a shutter count of over 50,000 to 100,000 but that's just me. You can get lucky, I once bought a full frame canon 6d second hand what was released over 10 years ago and the shutter count was only 300. Sometimes people buy them brand new, use them a few times and give up. If money is no issue I'd go for brand new though, every time. I struggle for money, if it wasn't for selling things and getting a loan I wouldn't have the gear I have. But I love it. If you go for second hand make sure you have some guarantee from the shop, a good shop usually gives you 6 months. And they should be able to tell you the shutter count. Hope this helps 😊
I'm a beginner photographer. I've had a bit of experience wit a couple of cameras and what I found was a good thing to look out for is the Interface of the camera. So like the screens and the menus. I have the Canon 250D and that's done wonders in all things I've wated to do. It's allowed me to have a go at a range of styles of photography like nature, astro and so on. It also shoots vid that's rly good as well. When anyone asks me what one to buy I always recommend the 250D, but I do say that it is quite an expensive budget one at £600 odd for the body, 18mm to 55mm and a 55mm to 250mm. So overall its a good beginner camera if u have some cash.
would you still recommend a 250d? I'm planning to get one.
@@abucku Which one did you end up getting? Are you satsified with it?
One point re mirror-less versus mirrored (pentaprism) is with a mirrorless you can (with live view enabled) see what the camera will actually take, unlike a mirrored. Also you can get post image display in the viewfinder if you choose to have it. The delay issue is only really significant on high speed sports, and there are mirrorless (Sony's for example) that have extremely fast Electronic View Finders.
Just started looking into buying my first camera and had no idea where to even start, this video helped immensely, thanks!!
You are welcome Matt 😊
For beginners, the first thing I’d do is read as many photography books as I could and learn about composition etc… 2nd I’d start doing homework on cameras and decide what you want. As in any industry there is a brand war amongst consumers but the reality is that if you do step 1 then the camera won’t make a whole lot of difference. All the major brands are good these days, it mainly comes down to personal preference.
Thanks JT 👍
Any suggestion for books? I find sometimes books are more helpful than videos... (not to mention the algorithms that TH-cam & google start tracking you)
One important factor when picking the brand (which can vary significantly) is it’s general ecosystem: once you buy the camera, do you have a varied choice of lenses? Can you find plenty of items on the used market for when you may want to experiment with new lenses or other items?
RF lenses are a punish, who would want that?
My first camera is a7iii and I'm soo happy with my purchase, 3 years into the photo and video world video mostly I just started pushing the limits of my camera I purchased a gem of a lens the 28-75 tamron f2.8. The idea is to give it time. Shoot as much as possible.
I started with a canon t6i and just recently moved to a canon eos R and is an insane difference I love my old camera but mirrorless and full frame is beautiful
I completely understand how you feel I started with the T7i and moved to the eos R and I’m absolutely in love with this camera
I've also been looking into the eos R and RP in the past days to be honest.
What would you say makes it the cut, why would one upgrade from a t6i to an eos rp (becauise it's cheaper than the r)
@@Daniel-dj7fh If you’re not looking to spend a lot of money and the RP can get the job done I would go with the RP for me I wanted something a lil more then RP and my T7i i’m not going to lie I caught up in buying gear that I didn’t need like Sony A6100 that I don’t use just make sure whatever you do it’s an upgrade from what you already have.
I’ve been looking at getting my first camera and am liking the Canon T8i and all the advancements it had over the T6i & T7i. What are your thoughts everyone?
Good information. All cameras from the last 5 years can produce great images. I think secondhand is a good option. Everybody seems to want the latest and greatest so there are some terrific secondhand bargains at present. Also before spending a £1000+ on a camera I would rent one and see how it feels. Remember some lenses can cost more than the camera body so check out how much the lenses cost for the camera of your choice. Photography should be fun so do not take out a second mortgage to buy your first camera, you will only regret it. Rather invest the money on training courses/travel etc.
Some great advice, Michael. Thanks for sharing!
Yes, I agree. As for shutter count, my first camera was a Canon Rebel 750D (a great camera to learn on, by the way), on which it's not possible get a shutter count. It's shutter is rated at 100,000 shots, but it's been round the block easily three times that, I´m sure, and it's still going strong.
Good summary. One thing I don’t think you spent enough time on are ergonomics. How the camera fits in the hand, how the buttons and dials meet your fingers, is very important. Some cameras agree with us, others don’t, and it can be the difference between really enjoying photography and leaving the kit at home and just using your phone.
I ran a D3200 for over 5 years shooting motorsports. The last 2 I started to see where it fell short for what I needed. That being low light capability/sensor size and stabilization. So I upgraded to a D750 and it felt like a perfect transition especially paired with a 70-200 2.8 VRII. The image stabilization was a game changer
Thanks for sharing 👍
The D750 is a great camera, but for sports and telephoto I’d recommend the apsc D7200 instead… better resolution, a bit lighter to carry, and the cropped view, framing telephoto shots more tightly
@@Mortenthorpe-DK I agree and I almost went that route but I also need low light capabilities. Which full frame is the best choice for
This is a great comment. it's easy to say I need to upgrade. It's great when you realize why. those were some wise unrelated words I once heard but matter here too. upgrade when you know why to upgrade. Not just because it's better.
I got the canon 4000d as a starter and it's an absolutely amazing starter for very little money, it's very light and is great for learning the basics, now I'm looking to upgrade because as great as it is, it has a few features lacking like an adjustable viewfinder and no cord ports for stuff like external monitors/mics or any other equipment, it also doesn't support most external flashers, I definitely do not regret buying it though because it definitely gave me what I needed as a starter
I actually just picked a 4000d up for myself as a starter camera. I'm loving it so far, do you any recommendations for additional lenses you picked up along the way?
@@MurphysSlaw992 the best thing to do is to check out your local pawn shops, some of them don't know what they have and you can get some pretty awesome deals, I got a sigma 200-600mm and a 50mm for like $40, each lense has it's own purpose and you just gotta play with them to see what works for which situations
@@colosine There's a pawn shop right down the street from me that has a 50mm lens for just about 100 bucks cheaper than Amazon is asking, so this is definitely solid advice, thanks for replying!
This is one of the best and the most comprehensive videos out here. It takes enormous effort to put this much information together this well. Thank you very much!
bought my first DSLR 10 years ago. a Canon 550D with 18-200mm kit lens. love it. still use it today. last year i upgraded to a 5Ds from around the same build year. i have to say. i will never get rid of my 550D i learned so much on it before i eventually upgraded to full frame. when people ask me what is a good camera to learn on. especially if they are still unsure about photgraphy i recomend them early canon or nikon cameras such as the 600D or D3200. those cameras are dirt cheap on the second hand market and have all the manual functions which you need to learn how to expose properly. the fact that you can pick one up with a kit lens for under 200 euros these days is amazing. especially if you are just starting out and still deciding if photgraphy is for you. i also recomend getting some kind of free photo editing software and begin playing around with shadows and highlights, color tone etc. editing your shot is a big part about creating your art and getting a photo to look how you pictured it in your mind when you took the shot.
Thanks Jon
Great video. In 2007 I entered the digital world with an Olympus e-510. I soon moved to the e-5. I stayed with the brand because I have so many lens. I currently shoot an EM-1X. I’m so used to a cropped sensor because full frame didn’t exist back when I started. I have never seen the need to switch “up” to full frame. The 3 pictures I take in low light a year I use DXO to remove any noise. Mark is the best at explaining the benefits of any sensor size. My take is look at the cost of the body and the lenses. Size too. Size matters. My small systems weighs nothing. Nice job guys.
Thanks, appreciate you sharing your story
I bought two used Canon 7D and one 1D Mark IV with low shutter counts recently. I've been shooting wildlife as a hobbyist for last 13 years. I love these gems and know them well. They serve me very efficiently. No need to be concerned about new gears.
I currently use an old Canon 700d, which is okay but I am growing out of it. I have looked around at most of the options, tried a few out but for me it comes down to these factors.
I already have money invested in Canon aps-c, that is four lenses, a flash, flash trigger, remote etc. So switching brands would be to expensive.
I have tried mirrorless with evf's but I wear glasses and prefer DSLR's with out evf's.
I tried Sony but I have reduced feeling in my fingers and kept pushing the lens release.
So in the end I decided to go up to the Canon 90d, it's still a better camera than I currently have, but I can keep my lenses etc and it doesn't break the bank.
In short be realistic and find the best camera for you that doesn't always mean having the best, brightest and most expensive camera just the best one for you.
Great view
The most complete and non-biased honest video I’ve seen. Thanks
You're welcome 👍
Thank you. It's a great guide for people starting out with photography. I would like to add 3 points.
1. For still images even cheap basic 6 year old camera with any sensor size will produce images easily good enough for almost any situation.
2. Try to hold the camera that you are interested in getting. I've always chosen cameras that feel good in my hand. If you don't you are less likely to use the camera and won't have it well.
3. Don't forget the extras / accessories in your budget. E.g. memory card and reader.
I've been serious about photography for the past 17 years. I mostly shoot a Mamiya 7 or an RZ67. But if I had to start all over again, I'd get something like the Fuji X100V and keep it on manual modes until I learned how to see light and color the way my camera sees it. Putting your camera in any kind of "Auto" mode will cripple your learning experience. I learned on the RZ and would suggest that, but it's big and film is an extra thing nowadays. The X100V is not cheap, but it will last for years and be of good utility during that time . If you're going into this hobby without some commitment I suggest you turn back now. Buying the cheapest thing up front is a sign of low commitment.
Thanks for sharing 👍
any budget friendly alternative?
Never ever be afraid of second hand and even antique! I once found a Konica AutiReflex T3 with two lenses in perfect working order in a local antique shop for $35
I started with a Nikon 70s, a 6 MP DSLR, and I used it for many years, developing myself from AUTO mode to M mode. My next one was a D300 and that was a big step. I still have it and shoot with it today. A few years later I bought a used D700, which I also still use. Then I started investing in some FX lenses and learned the difference between APS-C and Full Frame. For me it's not a question of quality, they both make great photos. It's how different they behave in the same situation, that was my learning project then. Recently I took another step and bought an APS-C Nikon Z camera, the fc to be precise. Now I'm learning how a mirrorless camera behaves and what it can do (including video that my DSLRs don't have). There is so much to learn all the time! I hope I get old enough to one day being able and switch to a full size sensor mirrorless, maybe a used Z9 or something similar. Photography is a big adventure, and it's really great to start with a small and simple camera to get into it. You can always make the next step when the time has come. Btw, I still have my D70s, it still works, takes nice pictures and I use it as a backup in case every other camera fails on me.
Hey at this moment, i have am using a D70s but the focus, no video, and many basic features that common these days are not in it, i just do casual photography and am gonna take classes on it and the camera was of my dad, sitting in bag for years so i just started taking more and more pics, it's been 2 years, and i have gotten a bit better but i am still pretty young at 16 years old and thinking about buying a Cannon MK II or Sony ZV e10 which one you think is better, but i think it will be a huge upgrade for sure
@@Justachamp772 I'm happy to hear that there are other people running the Earth who still use the D70s! I am not sure which Canon Mark II you aim on, there are several models who have Mk II in their model names. The Sony for sure is a big upgrade, make sure you buy a kit including a lens like for example the Sony E 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ OSS. I wish you all the best and a lifelong fun taking photos!
@@rakutzimbel4539 sorry m50 mk2 and thank you for the lens advice i will get one lens included but i need to learn more about them, cause i only use the one that came with it
@@rakutzimbel4539 i have taken over 10k pics with, i don't have any landscape place or travel at all outside my neighbourhood so i took pics of hotwheel cars, then they banned hotwheel cars in my country so now i take timer pics of myself, very hard to focus, low light perfomance was lacking, controls were a bit glichy that i can't always get a timer in very pic and have to change it every time but taling your own pic is hard as i didn't know shutter remote existed, but i want to make videos, self pics, macro shots, if i travel then landscape but most what that save my life was the tripod, i need it everywhere if i need more light in pics and no blur but focus sucks for sure, i am hyped to whenever i can get a chance to get any one of these, either a viewfinder one with good colours or better video, lowlight perfomance mirrorless will be a new experence
Just heard what I do actually know already - I’m into photography for about 14 years in a row and this is with DSLR’s. Yeah, only with Canon, but I like it :)
The ergonomic of it is stunning (for me, compared to Nikon).
Started with EOS 350D, then using 650D for several years bought 5D (classic). Again after about 5-6 years considered buying 5D Mark ii - for live-view experience with prime non-AF lenses as also for the new filming experience.
Honestly, when you gained some experience with Crop camera and you feel you need the Full-frame than it’s going to be your next main camera: I really shoot with the 650D no more that often or better to say “quite rarely”.
Wish all of you the best shots and to stay safe
Buy used, search classifieds, or look at camera shops for used cameras, you can frequently find them for hundreds off especially with older entry level dslrs
I bought a Canon EOS M50, so far it supports all my needs on producing quality videos..You are also right, it's really not on how expensive your camera is to take good photos and videos. This is great for beginners who looking for their first camera...Base on experience Canon M50 would be a great deal. Have a nice day!
Thanks for your kind words, glad you enjoyed the video 😊
Hi Marc, great video. As a beginner, I don't know other people so, as briefly mentioned at the start, I decided on a getting the best camera I could afford (that could also do video at 4k/60fps) I got a Panasonic S5 (£1400 with 20-60 mm lens and spare battery) my needs were for a general use camera thats good in low light and fast shutter speed and good quality video. its proved to be a great camera for me. I am a member of the school of photography and would highly recommend it to any beginner as not only will you learn so much, you will also find a great online community to help and support you, wherever in the world you are!
Thanks for sharing 😊👍
I am the "car guy" and "camera guy" in the office - people ask what they should buy. I always ask them - how much do you have to spend and what do you want to use it for? This video is perfect, the addition is to consider what you want to shoot- if want to take shots of their child doing indoor sports then autofocus ability and lens aperture will be more important - and they may need to save more or buy used. Thanks Marc - just joined the School of Photography today, time I paid back for the things I have learnt for free.
Thanks, glad to have you on board 👍
I have a Nikon D3500. Probably the best budget / beginners DSLR today. Especially for a 💩 photographer like me
A viable purchase brand new here in Australia and a good array of lenses available
A seriously absurd battery life rated at 1550 pictures but in real life ? It is wayyyyy beyond that
Nothing else compares really
I want to buy a camera. I'm a beginner. Is this still good for 2022?
@@ashwinkumar5065 I believe it is still rated as by far the best beginners camera on the market so I would say go for it.
Having an experience actually helps in buying a new camera, its going to make you consider what specs or features that you need to have for the next camera and that's what this guy has been mentioning that when you are a first time buyer "ever" you start with a budget camera for you to not be disappointed on what the camera has in store for you and at the same time, you can discover yourself on what do you want to do with your camera.
For tips, yes stick to your budget and this, compare cameras with the same price and try to choose what is best suited for you because every photographer or videographer have their biases and maybe you too so have a research before buying. Good luck!
Thanks, great video.
Totally agree - a more expensive camera won’t make you a better photographer; understanding composition is far more important.
Secondly, (and I’m not sure who’s quote this is), the best cameras is the one you’ve got with you when you want to take a photo. Make sure you get something that you’re happy to carry around.
Thanks Mike 👍
I've arrived a bit late to the conversation. I started shooting basic film cameras back in the late eighties, and for a few years into the nineties, but I gave up on photography at the time. When the spark hit me again, everything changed, everything was new and shiny and megapixels were a thing. So, I did what any right minded person yearning for nostalgia would do, I bought one of these new contraptions. No interchangeable lens, just a super zoom bridge camera and thought to myself "Self, you will be the best photographer in the world now". So, that didn't pan out.
About a month later, I hated the bridge camera. It was...ehh... alright for zooming in, but the options in the camera simply did not give me the control I wanted on the camera. Have you ever tried to adjust the focus manually on a bridge camera? it doesn't end well. So, I made the only rational choice I had available, I filed for divorce with the bridge. As it turns out, you don't need to hire a fancy lawyer to divorce a camera, you can just stick it back in its box and pretend it never happened. Like advantix film, and that library book you never returned. [I honestly wonder what my late fees are after twenty-eight years.]
So, now with that entire pre amble out of the way, and the likely hood no one will read this, the actual story. I spent two months researching everything about modern digital photography, and began assessing what my needs actually were. What I wanted to do with photography in the short, as well as long term. So, my first round picks for cameras that functioned in the way I thought I needed were put aside. The Canon 5dmkII, Nikon D800, Sony A7R and S. All spectacular cameras, all cameras I knew all the spec sheets for... None of which would of done me any good at that time. [Not to mention they were all fairly new on the market, and cost prohibitive.]
So, what I wanted, a camera I could hike with, a camera I could trust in bad weather, one that COULD get away with night photography when I wanted. Most importantly, one that I could afford realistically long term. I waffled between saving and buying one of the big fancy full frame cameras, got lost in fantasies about Medium Format. I was to the point of having fever dreams about cameras coming to take me to the insane asylum. I spent my entire downtime away from work researching cameras. At some point I began looking deeper into this whole contrived mythos built up around camera brands, features, bigger better, megapixel nightmare. Distilled it down, and realized, it's all subjective anyway. The ONLY person who is going to judge you for the camera in your hand is you.
That's when I found it though, after all of this inane waffling of mine. A Fujifilm X-T1. It really captured my imagination, and made me feel nostalgic. It wasn't full frame, it didn't have a large lens ecosystem. It was mirrorless. At the time, I had no idea what any of that really meant anyway. I tried to rent the camera, no dice at that time. Then I went to a few local camera shops, and discovered they didn't have this mythical unicorn of a camera either. Finally, I just said to myself "Self, you are a world class photographer, buy that camera without ever laying hands on it!". Somehow, at the time, it made sense to me. So, I slapped my credit card down, and bought a camera.
I think somewhere in the writing of this experience of buying a camera I had a moral in mind. If I really just condense this into a singular statement, it might read a little different. A camera is just a tool, just like a paint brush. A paint brush with buttons... and dials... and the end comes off...Ok bad metaphor.
Still using my d3200 from 9 years ago. Used to only shoot as a hobby but I’ve started using it for professional real estate photography and it’s more than capable for the job. I’m looking to add a full frame to my arsenal for the better depth of field and low light performance.
Two years later, could we have an update? Are you still using it? Is everything alright with your 3200?
I'm considering getting the D3300 as my very first one.
@@JeffStark-uz6cd ive switched to the sony a7c. reason is the d3200 lacked a auto bracketing feature which I need for my real estate photos. you can get great deals on the a7c because the a7cii and the a7iv are out. get the exact same features as the a7iii but in a more compact body and better value. grabbed mine for $1200 used great condition. if you don't need crazy amounts of features or if your within a budget the d3000 series is still a top buy.
I was going to buy a camera to take pictures of nature views,I work on a boat so I like to take pictures of sunsets,the moon and other boats.this video was essential for me,I gain more knowledge about cameras and now I know what kind of camera I should get.Thank you school of photography for this video
You are welcome Jermaine 👍
I have an uncle who is a press photographer. He loaned me a few cameras to try to find what suits my needs.
I ended up buying a CANON 2000D at about £350. I tried mirrorless but with a 100-300 mm zoom lens fitted the balance in the hand is horrible. So, No thanks.
Canon also offers a range of lenses for all needs. Usually you get a 17-55 mm zoom supplied. Add a 50 mm F1.8 prime and a 55-200 mm zoom and thats about all you need. A pistol grip and a tripod are worth having and you still have a light camera bag.
One thing you may consider is the range and quality of lenses available (for future growth)
there are more cameras that this doesn't apply to than systems it does apply to though. basically, Pentax/Canon efm/ and maybe the Nikon j series are about the main ones I can think of that will be very limited on lens choice. everything else these days is fairly safe to invest in.
Really well articulated overview of the main items to consider when looking to buy a camera. I went through the process about a year and a half ago. Decided on: Mirrorless, APS-C sensor, Canon. On the matter of budget I think one should examine the full range of gear wanted or perhaps needed i.e. bags to filters, extra batteries, etc. But don't forget items like editing software and will you need to travel to pursue you interest not to mention taking courses to help you learn? Great channel. Thanks. Oh, and lenses might be as important as the camera body.
Here is some great advise. Get yourself a used D5500 w/warranty think B&H, Adorama, etc. They are really cheap right now. It takes amazing pics. The lenses are also relatively cheap- get the nifty 50mm and the Nikor AF80-300mm and grab a nice Macro lens for fun. Then invest in a nice tripod like the 4 leg Leofoto. Pair that with a quality ball head. The quality of your gear matters. If you do panoramics (you should), get an indexing (clicking) pano head and a focus rail so you can compensation and limit parallax errors.
Read some good books and fire away- in Manual or a priority mode and use the Raw format. Learn to edit using a program like Affinity Photo.
I just got back from a trip out west and my pics came out amazing. I ordered some that are getting enlarged on metal- metalmouth does a great job.
One of the best tips these books taught me was to go snap happy. Take 1,000+ pics- narrow down to ~100- edit those. Of the hundred find your top 10- print out your top 3! Especially with people, the best shots are not always when they pose- but before or after. With landscapes, use exposure compensation and use an ND filter as needed. There are only a few main techniques that can make your photos stand out. Almost the least important IMO is the actual camera. As long as it is 24MP or higher- the glass and your technique are much more important considerations. I am not a pro- just a Joe but I can finally take very decent pics. Last tip- if you have Amazon Prime, you can create completely FREE unlimited photo galleries. The site does not compress your image quality either and you can easily share galleries via a link. I have no idea why they don't market this- no one know about it and it's hard to find. From the "Main" home page- left side, click ALL>>>Digital Content>>>Amazon Photos. DONE. I have about 6 galleries- all free.
Wholeheartedly agree with starting with a budget camera rather than jumping the gun on an expensive one.
My first camera was a Canon Rebel T5, and it taught me a lot of things - most importantly, it taught me that I HATED how big it was. I didn't take into consideration how big it was going to be at the time of purchase, but I found that carrying it around when I wanted to get into street photography was just not realistic. My assumption at the time was that if it was big and had a lot of buttons and dials, it was the better camera. Instead, the amount of buttons, coupled with my inexperience, caused me to be overwhelmed with options and led to a less enjoyable shooting experience.
So after getting some practice in and realizing how much I did not like using a DSLR body, I went the completely opposite direction and bought myself a Ricoh GR II. Absolutely miniscule by comparison and had a fixed lens. That's when everything clicked for me - the limitation of the fixed lens and the portability of the GR II really allowed me to grow as a photographer, and I had a hell of a lot more fun too.
I've since learned my preferences and have grown tremendously since those Canon T5 days. I now shoot with a Fujifilm X-E4, but I keep the Ricoh GR II with me when I still want something even smaller.
Thanks for sharing Troy 👍
Size does make a huge difference in what you will want to use. I will say the cheaper model Canons are not intuitive or friendly. I have used the T models and do not like them at all. The 5Ds are much easier to get around. They are actually a little bigger and fit better in the hand. That being said, I really don’t enjoy carrying around a big camera and for video, I just like something like a DJI pocket or GoPro.
The most important thing is that most people only need a point and shoot camera. If you are well diverse in photography then you will know what you can afford and what you want to do with it . As a pro. most people don't know the difference between a f stop and a buss stop. The cell phone has taken over the industry. Photography is a trade ,last time I was in school of modern photography . 1960 . There is a lot to learn in this field. 🇨🇦 .
Two things I personally find important are weather resistance and image stabilisation. For those reasons I think the Olympus stands out above the rest, but for those for whom those points aren't relevant, your advice that the brand doesn't matter is certainly on the mark. There are really no bad cameras today.
canon r5 is superior 💪😤
@@treeman7856 In the same way that a Rolls Royce is superior to a Ford. You are not comparing apples with apples.
@@JimNicholls I like that analogy lol 😆
The only thing to consider I missed in video is ergonomy - how the camera feels in your hands, how easy is to handle it. Just go to the camera shop and ask for cameras within range of your budget and take every camera in your hands - the differences are huge... But maybe this is important only for me :-) Anyway - great video!
Thanks Petr
Pentax is amazing beginner camera. Durable, weather resistant, in body image stabilization, - no other brand offers that bang for buck that pentax does.
I'm no professional photographer or really a photographer at all but I have taught myself how to take photos.
I usually try to take pictures of animals but I almost never get a good photo but that's just how animal photography goes but I somehow got an amazing picture of one of my dogs and used one of windows free photo editor and slightly changed the contrast and made it look 100x better.
I started photography a couple of years ago. I did some research online & although still expensive to me, I opted for the entry level Nikon D3500. I had no idea what I was buying but the reviews were consistent in their praise for the camera.
A couple of years on & I have to say I love it. I've gone through the stage of just photographing anything & everything in sight & am now starting to find areas of interest.
I'm now using manual mode more often than not & can see improvement in my shots.
The camera is great value & takes good quality images. I have the 'kit' lenses - 18-35 & 70-300mm and last year I bought a prime 50mm lens which I love using for night time street photography.
On the advice of a SoP video; I bought lens hoods for my 'kit' lenses & that really helps improve daytime shooting.
As the D3500 is entry level, the only thing I can say is that when shooting at night, the ISO doesn't cope well above 1600. Up to that point, the image quality is still very good but the next available option is 3200 & the quality is pretty rough. I'm sure more expensive cameras can cope better but for what I'm using the camera for, I can't praise the D3500 enough. I find it easy to use, especially as there is plenty of help available online or in manuals.
The 50mm prime lens was also great value at around £150.
It's unlikely I'll get to the stage where I can spend big bucks on a camera or lenses as the entry level was a big outlay for me. I'm just glad that I can still get great quality images and learn photography skills with a camera of entry level standard.
(When I say great quality images, I mean the camera's image quality, I'm not blowing my own trumpet! 😁)
Excellent video I'm now the owner of 3 nikon cameras it's an amazing hobby. You will learn to see the world around you and yourself in very different ways. Hobby photography for me has become a form of therapy and I'm grateful for it.
Glad you enjoyed the video! We agree, photography is an amazing hobby 👍
Hi. What ones do you have?
@@patrycjaw8323 D700 used D7500 used D850
I've been working as a professional photographer for over 30 years and I still use a Canon EOS 40D
It's taken over 100,000 images, it's had 1 main circuit replacement and it still does a great job.
I am taking the Beginning Photography class with my Canon M50, and the M50 is producing results at the right price. Thanks Marc for this video.
Great to hear! Glad to have you on board.
If you really want to enter photohraphy and I mean photography not video, and do something more than with your phone, go for these:
Canon 5d mk 1,2,3, 6d
Nikon d600, 610, 700,750...or sony or pentax or whatever FF.
And a 50mm 1.8 lens.
All you need.
And when you get bored, you will easily sell it.
If however, you stay in the photography world, and decide to get better gear, or maybe take it to the next level, then you can think of making a bigger budget and then get something new.
And then first, start building lens arsenal, lens is much more important than the newest body with it's options.
Also you need to learn how to use PS and Lightroom.
I would personally recommend a second hand past generation model. Often coming with one or two lenses, extra batteries, etc… so to get a kit to start.
It’s only after practicing and learning that you will understand what your needs are. Therefore not worth spending too much on first camera kit. It could result being your first love but probably not the last one. And in case photography does not interest you anymore, than you have not lost too much money
Thanks for the input Andrea :)
Great advice.
I've personally gotten canons 50mm stm for resonably cheap second hand. And after maybe 3 years realised how not terrible the kit 18-55mm lense is. You really don't need any kit (except the camera + a battery and a lense) if you're a beginner.
100% agree with that. Even if you are like myself that did photography, but wanted to get into the DSLR and away from a film camera, I picked up a very good 2nd hand Nikon D7000 with the kit lense for around $600. Added a few more lenses to the stable plus all the other goodies like extra batteries, flash, remote flash, etc.....
M50m2, 18-150mm zoom is an fantastic combination for me. The camera can do just about anything I want to shoot with image quality good enough for an A2 print.
One point I would mention but has nothing to do with the camera itself is to invest into a decent but simple to use photo editor package. IMO this is an absolute MUST with digital photos and will easily triple your shooting yield by being able to crop and thus concentrate more on the subject, cut away unwelcome intrusions at edges, level out the horizon or straighten vertical lines, adjust contrast, brightness, saturation and add sharpening. The editor I use cost me 60USD but yields excellent results. There a few available at roughly that price and most have a free trial period.
To add, I had a Canon Powershot 560HS, which is a bridge camera. The zoom range was phenomenal but eventually I got disillusioned by the limited F stop range, 2.5 stops at best, 1 stop at worst, the poor dynamic range (1.2/3 sensor IIRC), and having no touch screen. These were the reasons to buy an M50 and I am now more than happy with it.
Thanks for your input, Peter! 😊
Marc summed this up perfectly and I think a majority of us all make the same silly mistake of thinking that a particular camera will make you better but believe me it doesn’t. Budget is normally key when buying your first camera, more so at the beginning because you want to buy everything else that goes with it! If you can, try to narrow down your shortlist and then try and hold the camera as well to make sure it feels comfortable in your hand. When you buy into a system you tend to stick with it so it’s well worth making sure it’s what you really want so if it does seem too expensive then do consider used from a reputable company or camera store because these will all come with a warranty.
Good advice Garry, thanks for sharing 👍
I have a mirrorless and I agree with you the real time aspect is missing. Its not always fun to view through the screen especially when you want to see the image immediately. My next camera is going to have mirrors.
I ended up with a choice of canon or Nikon at 500 notes with very similar spec , I chose the Nikon over the canon due to the feel in the hand when using it and neglected that it did not have an intervalometer or mic socket on it .
In all honesty I haven't missed those as much as I initially thought after I came home and am truly impressed with the Nikon .
Mpb , ffordes and lce are really handy for getting second hand quality lenses etc rather than running the risk of a complete stranger on a bidding site .
The ‘feel in the hand’ is one of the best points in any of these threads. Sooooooo important!
Absolutely top advice! I have always bought used from the well known companies and have saved a lot of money. The major ones always give at least 6 months guarantee, so that gives peace of mind. I have printed to A3 from the cheapest and I am perfectly satisfied. Keep up the good work!
Thanks Peter
I started off with the Nikon D3300 which I purchased online as someone I knew had one and found it easy to use, Mine had been used purely for video, so the shutter count is low. The only downside for me was its size as i have small hands. I saw a video on TH-cam featuring the Fujifilm X-T1 and liked the size and the layout of the buttons. The crazy thing is, this is a professional level camera that paired with a kit lens you can get for less than the price of an entry level camera off the high street. The mega pixel level is lower but the features are great and sites like MPB and LCE (London Camera Exchange) test and warranty all their cameras.
Thanks for sharing Peter 👍
My first experience with SLR was a Manuel Pentax K1000. With it, I gained a good understanding of aperture, shutter speed and ISO. Some years later I stayed with the same brand DSLR K30. It's solid and I don't expect to outgrow it anytime soon.
I started with a Pentax too.
Never experienced the solenoid problem? From what I've heard, it seems to ruin most of the K30s, K50s and K500s after 10 - 20k exposures. OTOH, if that happens, you can get a used K2 for about 200 quid today and keep your lenses.
Another thing, maybe not that important to some, is how the camera feels and the colour science.
I have the Fujifilm X-T4, and have used Fuji due to the colour science and I love the feel and look of the camera.
I was gifted a Nikon D5100 and it's what I'm learning on. It won't last long since the older lenses are harder to find but it's working really well for me.
what? Which "older lenses"? There are tons of lenses for the nikon F mount, and there will be for years to come
You have literally decades of lenses available (just the really oldest ones, made for film, may have no autofocus but can still mount them and manual focus with them). I am buying a used d7200 right now because I made all comparisons and it's basically same picture quality, more features and cheaper and has TONS and TONS of more lenses than any mirrorless out there atm. Sure don't spend thousands on lenses so you don't lock yourself in the ecosystem, but you can do several years with that camera. If you really outgrow it (doubtful, but say you're the 1% that really becomes advanced) it means you will want a full frame anyway so no matter the system that will be new lenses as well.
I am only upgrading as I had a d50 which is a 6mp 2005 system with slower and less accurate focus and I really kind of need to at this point. My oldest lens is a 1987 35mm fixed focal length I got off ebay to experiment with.
Great information for those about to buy there first camera. The only thing i would add is that if like me you want to do wildlife phtography it is a good idea to pick a camera with a reasonably fast fps otherwise it is incredibly hard with fast moving animals.
Great tip! Thanks Steve 👍
I am new to photography. Thank you for your very informative video, one of the best on TH-cam. I love wildlife and Landscape. I Currently have a Bridge camera( Lumix) but find I am not getting the images I want( its probably me and not the camera). I now want an interchangeable lens camera, but which one? So many to chose from. I will continue with my Lumix fz82 for now, but can't wait to upgrade.
I have done photography from the early 8os starting with a Minolta 300, then to Minolta Autofocus models to eventually Sony digital. For the simple reason it used the Minolta lenses, now I use the original A7 and an A 6000. Both do all I need and more and reason went Sony was I could keep my Minolta lenses with an adapter, you don’t need latest or best I still use Minolta lenses. Buy what you can afford and take loads of photos keep away from fully auto and use manual or one of the priority settings. Most of all take plenty of photos that’s most important thing.
Thanks for sharing Marc 👍
I'm glad I found this video. Back in the 90's my dad spent a few thousand dollars on a Minolta Maxxum 7000 and 4 lenses. He used it about a dozen times and forgot about it. Just before he passed, he asked me if I wanted the camera, knowing I was considering getting into photography. I of course was more than happy to accept it. It was in rough shape. The batteries had been left in the frame, the flash and others in a side pocket. Needless to say the camera is unusable, but the lenses were in their own pouches and in perfect condition. I had read that Sony a cameras can accept these Minolta AF lenses. I am now looking to buy my first camera and would like to make use of these lenses. Is the a6000 or another in that series, right for using these lenses?
This is an impressive video. I appreciate the balance and the nuance. There is no perfect solution for every situation and everyone really needs to accept this up front. For instance, sensor size is correlated with the capacity to gather light and ‘dynamic range.’ The reviewed cameras are ‘referenced’ to a 35 mm sensor (itself related to 35 mm film) but there are larger cameras to be had as well - Hasselblad makes a fine medium format digital ‘back’ that totally eclipses the light gathering of the best 35 mm digital sensor. But one would be hard pressed to use the Hasselblad in fast moving sports environments. And it’s expensive.
I’ve shot the Minolta SRT 101 (my first film camera) and the Nikon F4 (also film), and the cropped sensor Nikon D90 and the full format Nikon D610, as well as the very nice (for people pictures) Fuji X100T. Most post-processing in Adobe Lightroom. I own DX and FX lenses for the Nikon system, some of them pro lenses, like the amazing 24-70, and the 200 mm micro lens. That said, all of this kit is frigging heavy to carry. Sure, I can pack the Nikon 24-70 (very heavy) and the Nikon 70-300 (ok lens) and have a full frame/full format range from 24 at the wide to 300 at the telephoto. I can toss my Really Right Stuff tripod into the trunk as well. And the … and the … and the … I feel like I need a Sherpa to tag along.
Or, I can bring along the Sony RX 10 IV, which has a decent one inch sensor, a 25x fixed super telephoto lens with some wide at the short end (think 24-600 mm) and some macro capacity. It shoots in RAW and has decent fast action and slow mo options, shoots video, has a good grip handle, and is light to hold or carry! They say this is a ‘bridge’ camera, but at my age, carrying all the kit is not worth the greater dynamic range. As the gentleman says, if you can’t take a good picture with what is available, the camera equipment won’t help.
Weight vs. low light/dynamic range/ vs. wide angle when needed vs. super-zoom telephoto when needed vs. ISO without noise vs. shutter speeds to stop action vs. good bokeh (the creaminess of the background that blurs together when tightly focused on something) … all important qualities, but not all of these are important all the time.
Thanks Grace 👍
So I was on my photography project with a friend. He had an expensive camera and I had a cheap 10 year old canon. I had learned some basics of photography at college and let me tell you, having a camera that has more options to mess around with is super fun and did end up in better photos. It's unfair that I am comparing my $170 camera to his camera that was 10 times has expensive, but he didn't have any skills so i benefited
Great informative video. Thanks. I bought a NIKON D3300 - 24 mp in 2015 my first DSLR camera with just the kit lens of 18-55. I still have it and have never got round to getting any other lens for it ( not sure what would be the best one to get anyway - maybe you can advise). I have used it an awful lot and I get great images from it. I am only a hobby photographer anyway. Depending on where I am and what I am photographing I mostly used manual settings but still now and then revert to Auto No flash or sometimes just use a few of the built in effects for fun the only trouble with those is you have no control with settings using those. I tended to use flash quite a lot as well but don't do at present as I think there is now a loose wire/connection in it as it doesn't always go off unless I am lucky enough for the camera to maybe be tilted a bit in the right direction so the connection is being made inside for it to just go off just once, then it won't go off again. It really needs to be mended but I am thinking that it would cost too much to get sorted for what the camera is now worth now. I have seen a TH-cam video on how you can pull the flash apart to sort the wires out inside but I am reluctant to do so as it looks quite fiddly and am fearful of making things even worse as it is the only camera I have. Any suggestions as to what would be a good plug on flash unit to get instead maybe a ring one or something else to compensate for the built in flash not always working.. I really don't know where to start with that kind of stuff. Apart from my little flash problem I really love this camera and would like some advise if I were to upgrade which would be a reasonable one to go far as would like a better zoom but really don't want to have to keep changing lenses or carrying more of them with me. I also love macro but don't use this setting on the camera as I don't think it makes any difference as you can only get so close to a subject before it won't focus anyway. So I usually just crop the image afterwords and have still managed to get quite a lot of detail on those images although it probably wouldn't be quite as detailed as you can get using a dedicated macro lens it is still pretty good. Sorry for rambling on any advice from anywhere is welcome.
I am also "only" a hobby photographer, and I have no intention of ever venturing into the professional world. It's doesn't make you an inferior photographer.
I'm not a professional photographer either. I have a Canon 4000d. I recommend you buy the cheapest 50 mm (portrait) and 24 mm (nature, city, wide angle) lenses, if Nikon has them.
I bought a Canon 2000D/rebel T7 and I’m enjoying it very much. Great camera for a beginner like myself.
Already deep rooted into the Lumix G9.
Doing a gender reveal with it next week with 10-25 1.7, 42.5 1.7 prime, 12-60mm, 50-100mm, Godox AD200 Pro, ND Filters, etc.
🥲 by summer, I might upgrade to full frame. R6 or S1R.
I've done 2 weddings with my G9 as a second shooter, a Bat Mitzvah, and some Christmas photo shots.
I feel like I can juice out my G9 for a while, and yes planning to keep the baby for long run for social media purposes and video content.
But for higher end stills, definitely looking between S1R, R6 or R5 or A7R IV.
God willing.
But until then?
Enjoying leica technology at a good price with Panasonic.
Thank you for the video.
Bought my first ever camera the Panasonic Lumix GX80 w/ G.vario 12-34mm lens last month. For me it's the perfect camera because though it's a bit old it has the features I need. It produces sharp pictures and can shoot 4K videos if I want to. I'm still learning maybe if I'm a bit more experienced and confident I'll upgrade to a full format or APSC camera.
As a pro photographer, I totally agree with your vid. You will have helped a lot of beginners to choose the correct beginner's camera. Personally, I shoot Nikon D pro cameras I now photograph landscapes here in Scotland. For years I lugged a huge camera bag full of huge Nikon bodies and lenses plus as you said a heavy-duty tripod. by the time I climbed the path to The Old Man of Storr, on The Isle of Skye it took me 20mins and a cup of tea to get into some state of recovery haha. Then I discovered a little gem that broke all the said rules of pro photography. I stumbled across marcus pix vlog on the Panasonic G100 M4/3rds camera that Panasonic had launched as a vlog camera and was totally slated on some vlog vids. Marcus proved that this tiny little camera instead of being a vlog camera was in actual fact a damned fine stills and video camera capable of using a myriad of different makes of lenses. So I bought into this system discovering that this tiny camera is related to some of the top of the range Panasonic Pro cameras similar to the G9 and above but with the latest software upgrades. My landscapes are rarely printed above A4 they appear in calendars and magazines so ISO is never a problem the 20MB sensor is excellent at picking up the images. the biggest plus for me is my camera and associated lenses fit into a 15in by15in by 5in plastic waterproof case that I don't even notice I'm carrying. BTW weight is now a big factor for me I'm 70 years young and have MND the G100 suits me down to the ground and yes it still takes me ages and a cup of tea to recover from the climb to The Old Man of Storr.
Thanks for sharing Brian 👍
Best camera (bag) is the one user can carry as often and to as many places as possible and not brand/religion icon collection sitting on shelf.
What is claimed as photography community is really religion club as full of fundamentalists as Saudi government...
I'm not an experienced photographer, but I've been making pictures for a few years now.
My only tip would be: People think they need something better, but it's their skills which needs to be better. You can even take really good pictures with cheap cameras.
I don't think my eos2000d will not last forever either tbh.
What a video man, astonishing. I have watched so many videos but your content is just simple and self explanatory. I should have watched this video first hand . Good work man, cheers.
I've been doing photography for 12 years. I had a Nikon D3100 to start off with. I then got a D7000 and used that for 9 years. I just recently bought a used D500. I never needed a full frame camera. I never felt like my photography would have improved with full frame. But the last few months I've really gotten into my photography again and want to start posting and sharing my results so I will probably be looking at upgrading to the next generation of full frame mirrorless cameras. I should have waited. I think I learnt about photography and used the camera as a tool and only replaced it when I knew I had outgrown it. But yeah, you can get some great shots with very little gear. the gear is not the most important part. the enjoyment of photography and getting out to shoot is the only important part. But learning how to use the camera as a tool to be comfortable with it is also important.
Very informative video! I intend to use a camera for photography on mountain biking so was shocked to see my local biking spot featured at 11:30
Only 3.5 yrs of photography here after starting at 47 yrs old which started with a fujifilm s6500fd for the first couple of months, and then purchased canon's entry level 200d with 18-55mm and 55-250mm lens bundle, plus a bag, sd card and cheapest tripod I could get. Have since added an extra battery, Tokina 14-20mm lens, sigma f1.4 30mm and upgraded to a far better tripod plus a levelling base and nodal rail, all of this has me covered from milky way nightscapes with the Tokina to night street with the sigma 30mm and general scenes and local sports with the kit lenses. My upgrade will only be to a 90d or secondhand 5dmk4, when that will be I don't know but either will see me through what ever happens next.
I was surprised how many mirrorless cameras have no built in flash. For me, that was one of my deciding factors when choosing a new Canon 90d.
Are you happy with your choice of the Canon 90D? I'm considering that one for my 1st interchangeable lens camera. Have previously used bridge cameras. I most enjoy shooting birds and wildlife. Is it a beast to carry?
Marc, I still own and use the first camera I bought it's a Canon 50d I bought, I bought it New, magnesium alloy body semi- pro they called it, I had a New shutter mechanism recently, great camera , I think you can get them fairly cheaply these days , I would say the downside is the use CF cards , far more expensive than SD card ,and you have to be gentle putting the card in, lots of pins to bend if your careless 15.5 mpx, the largest I print to is A4, loads of lenses for them EF & EFS both work well on the crop sensor , I like the white balance control on it on the K setting, another downside is no video unless you put magic lantern software in it , not for me though, hope this helps anyone
Thanks Paul, appreciate your story here 👍
You can buy an SD to CF adapter and use SD in your camera.
It's only been 3 weeks since I've got my first camera sony a6400 . It would still take time for me to get the hang of it but the features have amazed me . I feel I made the right choice, it's a semi-proffesional camera and absolutely dynamic with the use .
AF, LIGHTWEIGHT and the wide range of lenses
Looking into buying a camera and had no idea where to even start, this video helped immensely also saved me a ton of money so a big thank you.
Such a lovely and informative video. I seriously got so hooked to this video, I can't appreciate it enough for keeping it so clean and right to the point. You sir have gained a subscriber! Again, I loved the video a lot!
Welcome aboard Khush 👍
Very informative video, but one thing I would add is what you plan to do with the camera in the future, if you are going to be shooting wildlife, taking portraits, etc the availability of lens that you might want to purchase in the future. For example there aren’t as many lens available for micro 4/3rds as there are for Nikon F mount.
Very sensible advice. Additionally, don’t get caught up in megapixel obsession. All the crop-sensor and micro 4/3 cameras have more than enough resolution. *(My first digital DSLR was a Panasonic L1; its now-laughable 7 megapixels was fine for 8x10 and even 11x14 prints.) One more comment: Consider your first DSLR or mirrorless camera as a temporary learning tool; after 3-5 years, you’ll know enough to decide whether you want to get a more sophisticated camera or keep your starter camera and upgrade with lenses.
My first camera had 1.3 megapixels. Today my phone has 48 megapixels!!!
I started with a "hand me down" 35mm film dslr Canon AE-1. Even learned to process my own film when I had it. Had it for a long time. Then I had a Canon T-3i because it was all I can afford at the time. Then switched to a refurbished Canon 5D Mark III until it stopped working. I recently purchased Canon R8 using my old EF lenses with an EF-RF lens. I'm happy with my R8.
My Canon M50 has been really nice for what I've used it for, but more and more I'm less on the photography side and more on the videography side, so I kind of wish I had bought a M6MKII for the dual pixel AF in 4K. It's still a great budget option, though the lens mount isn't going to be getting much love from Canon going forward. If you have the money, getting something with a RF mount is a better long term decision. Going with Sony is also a pretty good move, since they don't seem to want to abandon the E mount like Canon is with EF-M.
Thanks, appreciate the comments here 👍
Can i use Rf lenses in canon M50 mark ii??
@@dynamicdestination Short answer is no. And TBH putting RF glass on an M50 would defeat the purpose of having a compact camera body in the first place. I see absolutely no reason to try to adapt RF glass when you have a number of great lenses in the EF-M line (The Sigma trio, the 11-22mm, the 32mm F1.4 etc).
If I had RF glass money, I'd have an RF body to mount it to, and I can't think of any reason to go through the trouble to adapt a lens to a camera that would not be able to use the control ring.
@@LunarGlowMedia Thank you very much for answering me...
And I asked for RF lenses because I don't have problems in future.
My dream camera is R6 and in future, I will buy it.And that's why I asked, so that I can buy lenses from now on that will work well with the R6.
I know that F lenses will also work with the adapter but this needs to be updated with the times to come. That's why I want to invest one time...
@@LunarGlowMedia The meaning of my question was that I should take that lens for M50 which will help me in coming future.
As a beginner split the budget between training ( photography and photoshop) and good used equipment from a reputable dealer, once you have enough knowledge save to get what you want, lenses first then body, buy well once and don’t get caught up in chasing the latest and greatest gear.
Good advice Martin 👍
My question as a beginner is if it is really worth buying a camera instead of taking pictures with my iPhone, as I mainly take them when traveling or doing trips. 🤔
This is the perennial question. For the iPhone, it is convenient (and light) and takes impressive photos. If your use is primarily a quick photo which you want to share with others easily and quickly, then there is no reason whatsoever to buy a camera. Most folk who use an iPhone as their ‘camera’ don’t care about the rationale around choosing a camera. Where I am going is that if you are a beginner and want to improve your use of the iPhone as a camera, there are excellent tutorials out there to do just that.
All that said, you are shooting in a compressed format, so every image you take is somewhat limited with what you can do with the image, that is, in post-processing, as a way to improve or correct errors. But even saying this suggests that post-processing is something you would want to do! I love this aspect of photography, but didn’t love the darkroom during the film era. As for printing, I am unwilling to invest in a high-enough quality color printer, so if I have images I do want printed, I send them out to a pro shop.
The obvious three upsides to a ‘camera’ as opposed to a iPhone are (1) the capacity to shoot in RAW, so as to gather every single bit of light, (2) a larger lens and a larger digital sensor to capture more detail and more ‘dynamic range,’ and (3) the capacity to get all of this with a super-telephoto, like on the Sony RX 10 IV.
The biggest problem is the short focal length and the lack of unfocused background. Also you have no manual control.
Watching this because looking to get back to photography. My last DSLR was the Olympus E-620 great handling, really like the skin tones, and serviceable lenses. Alas the electronics have gone belly up. Something similar would be nice.
I bought the nikon 3500 which was great for getting my head round the basic controls but couldn't stop myself buying the the D7500 because I enjoyed photography so much I wanted a camera that would challenge me more on the tech side as well. these are both crop senses so not too expensive ?. good info in vid
Thanks Davey! Glad to hear you're enjoying photography 😊
@Davey Boy what is the difference u feel after the upgrade
Hi Ashwin . The image quality is a step up due to the better sensor I think .ie Colours and sharpness.. plus the feel and learning to use a more top end camera. . Better lenses does make a difference too.
Just bought my camera yesterday, and saw this today 🙂 Good tips in this video, but I would add that if you are looking for a second hand camera, then check witch brand is represented most in your area. This will give you a adwance both in price and to find just that model you are looking for. Here in Denmark, in the range I was looking in, it was clear thatthe Sony a6000 models were best represented. So that is what I went with, and when I start looking for a second Lens, there should be plenty to choose from. Great video, thanks, just subscribed
What you intend to photograph decides what camera you need to buy.
Personally I have a quality non DSLR that slips into my pocket for convenience. I have a big chunky DSLR with big heavy lenses for serious work and a lighter version for travel.
One tip that's missing: Leave at least two thirds of your budget for lenses. The kit lens that mostly goes with the body is ok for a start but will leave you frustrated in the long run. A good lens, if bought brand new, will easily cost you three or four times the price of the body.
Also, if you don't like to buy used gear, choose a system with a living ecosystem. That leaves Canon R (full frame), Sony Alpha with E-mount, Nikon Z, Panasonic Lumix S (full frame), Fujifilm X (crop only), OM Systems (ex-Olympus, MFT) and of course Pentax for those who love "true" DSLRs. Everything else has been abandoned or will be soon. Careful with Canon, too, as they have closed their systems for third-party manufacturers, which means that beautiful and affordable lenses from Sigma, Tamron and the like won't be available anymore for users of newer Canon systems. On the other hand, 2nd hand markets are full of cheap gear for "vintage" systems, but as has been said, there's always a risk.
when i started to look for something better than a point and shoot box (still in analog times) i
looked for works of great photographers hat took photoes with a style i would like to take too, and imagined the equipment and features neccessary to create a similar shot.
Based on this i loooked for the camera options with the feature set i wanted. Then picked based also on available expansion options for my use case (lenses), brand reputation, price budget - and if there is an additional top model in the same line (maybe for future a-camera, that would be compatible to the same line of lenses). Then i started saving money...
However i think You must think different if you are sure to ditch this learning camera after a short time, or if You consider keeping it for several years of usage.
The greatest photographers all used Leica rangefinders with a fixed 35 or 50 mm lens, because it was the best and most resistant the could buy at their time.
my first camera was a nikon 5100 (second hand) and i absolutely loved it. im not a professional, but the manual mode was very comfortable to use. It has a simple interface, sadly i had the problem about the cables for transfering the fotos. it is an old model, so many computers couldn't read my camera and i had to take out the memory itself, and if the memory got damaged, i just lost all the fotos on it. Sadly about a week ago i went to venice and someone stole my beloved camera (thats why im checking what to buy next), but i really wish i could get the same or a similar one.