Interpreting M+ Peaks in Mass Spectrometry

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ก.พ. 2015
  • Visit our website for the notes of this lecture: knowbeetutoring.wordpress.com/
    Get private tutoring from anywhere in the world, via your computer, from this instructor. He offers help in Organic Chemistry, General Chemistry, Physics, MCAT, PCAT, and DAT.
    SUBMIT AN MCAT PROBLEM AND I WILL SHOW YOU HOW TO SOLVE IT VIA VIDEO. FREE. VISIT WEBSITE FOR DETAILS.
    knowbeetutoring.wordpress.com/

ความคิดเห็น • 67

  • @SandyLucy11
    @SandyLucy11 7 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Thank you, sir. Your explanation was splendid and cleared a lot of my misconception. Thank you!~

  • @DSnowaws
    @DSnowaws 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    These are probably the best Mass Spec explanations I’ve ever heard in my life

  • @Ajtraytray
    @Ajtraytray 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Your explanations are simply amazing. God bless you

  • @victoriableecker8226
    @victoriableecker8226 ปีที่แล้ว

    2 minutes into the video I learned more than I did in lecture. Thank you so much

  • @rimshakhan9684
    @rimshakhan9684 7 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    thank you sooo much sir. your videos helped me a lot to get these spectroscopic techniques. i must say that u did an excellent job to help students like me :P
    stay blessed. may you get the best reward for doing these videos :)

    • @Knowbee
      @Knowbee  7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Fantastic compliment! Too kind. Made my day!

  • @khodaniganeli8489
    @khodaniganeli8489 6 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    i thought ill never understand mass spectroscopy but i was wrong, thank you Sir!!

  • @swadhinchetia2792
    @swadhinchetia2792 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Teacher should be like you. Great job. Hoping for more videos. Love from India

  • @shammahndzalama9731
    @shammahndzalama9731 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This has literally helped me to understand this much better ... thank you so much sir God enrochly bless you

  • @Sophia-sp7eb
    @Sophia-sp7eb ปีที่แล้ว

    this is the first time I understood any concept in o.chem 100%. thank you sir.

  • @MuhammadNaeem-mm8hk
    @MuhammadNaeem-mm8hk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the kind video sir. You have made my way of solving the spectroscopic problems very interesting. May you live long sir. ❤

  • @Theperfectblabla
    @Theperfectblabla 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you! This helped so much!

  • @user-tg1en3gk7k
    @user-tg1en3gk7k 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Perfect explanation, THANKS ALOT!!

  • @brenna760
    @brenna760 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is an amazing video and I needed it for my final tomorrow so thank you so much!!!!!

  • @SonuNigamUnofficial
    @SonuNigamUnofficial 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    you are the best teacher I HAVE ever come through in my whole Chemistry Studying life... Your are blessed with the ability of teaching tough things like Fairytales ...wow stay healthy and spread knowledge .. you are my favourite ... where to get the links to have chat with you sir .... and lastly What is your name ?? thank u so much

  • @aso1569
    @aso1569 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    thank you so much 😊 god bless you 🙏🏻

  • @kavitadumaga1973
    @kavitadumaga1973 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks sir.... It help me a lot.. Plzz prepare some more videos on organometallic chemistry

  • @urwabajwa3502
    @urwabajwa3502 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Life savour kind of videos🥺❤

  • @shushayhagos3190
    @shushayhagos3190 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No words , it is great

  • @rajeshkumarbehera9834
    @rajeshkumarbehera9834 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir it is my luck that i found your video which helped me very much.thank you

  • @lexibexitextinexi
    @lexibexitextinexi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    DUDE DESERVES A MEDAL FOR BEING SO CLEAR

  • @BilalAhmad-sr5uw
    @BilalAhmad-sr5uw 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir you gave a lot of knowledge.thankss

  • @krishna795
    @krishna795 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is smooth. Thank you

  • @romulus2225
    @romulus2225 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video and example sample analysis

  • @towhidsmail
    @towhidsmail 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much for your well organized and easy explanations. It made my study easy.

    • @Knowbee
      @Knowbee  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're welcome!

    • @shehanai123
      @shehanai123 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jijo2

  • @sammadsaeed3373
    @sammadsaeed3373 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Life saviour!!

  • @tuck295q
    @tuck295q 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think you might mixed up methyl butane MS with pentane from the previous video. The MS looks more like methyl butane one or am I wrong?

  • @ayeshaasif20asif73
    @ayeshaasif20asif73 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing explanation

  • @dhaneeshapb3154
    @dhaneeshapb3154 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you sir...

  • @wgdanmourad
    @wgdanmourad 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are the best

  • @Carvel
    @Carvel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THANK YOU!

  • @uzmabatool3437
    @uzmabatool3437 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant explanation

  • @goodluckgoody1366
    @goodluckgoody1366 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU VERY MUCH SIR

  • @mohammadhamza8942
    @mohammadhamza8942 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank youu legend

  • @abrahamrivera5660
    @abrahamrivera5660 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    very helpful!

  • @shammahndzalama9731
    @shammahndzalama9731 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir if it happens that we dont have m+1 how can we determine the molecular formula?

  • @akeedasharma4249
    @akeedasharma4249 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a doubt.
    I agree that relative intensities of molecular ion peak involving both Br isotopes should be same.
    The doubt is that why this m+2 peak. Is there for molecular ion peak and for other peaks such as base peak. Why don't we have M+2 base peak of same intensity
    Pl. Answer

  • @songohan393
    @songohan393 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you a lot

  • @benjaminhogan3157
    @benjaminhogan3157 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    BRAVO!!!!!

  • @ayeshasiddiqua2607
    @ayeshasiddiqua2607 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plz explain what will be the relative intensity of m m+2 m+4 peaks for 2Cl if present instead of Br

  • @zahoorahmad-rt1hl
    @zahoorahmad-rt1hl 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Due to the presence of different isotopes of an element in a compound, the parents ions responded differently. How about the daughters ions? As the individual parent ion will generate different daughter ions of different m/z values.

  • @amandawramage5865
    @amandawramage5865 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm confused as to why pentane is displayed on the graph? I thought only ions were displayed? Pentane does not appear to have an electron removed. Can someone please explain??

    • @Junior-hq3hy
      @Junior-hq3hy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I may be incorrect but the way it works aswell is such that sometimes the whole molecule just becomes an ion due to the way an electron hits the molecule (by just knocking off an electron whilst simultaneously not changing the molecule structure) that’s what they call the parent/molecular ion (in this case pentane)

  • @skylersorkin6129
    @skylersorkin6129 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you thank you thank you thank you

  • @gildebertvonhaargert5327
    @gildebertvonhaargert5327 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU

  • @chemistrysmystery8467
    @chemistrysmystery8467 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir

  • @thomasmuntzer1004
    @thomasmuntzer1004 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    But is there not a Chance that there are molekus that have 81br and 13C? So they weigh 125?
    By the way thank you very much!

  • @dimitrisgkiousas8928
    @dimitrisgkiousas8928 ปีที่แล้ว

    super!!

  • @rameshbanothu1058
    @rameshbanothu1058 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tnq sir

  • @fenfentang2263
    @fenfentang2263 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can anyone tell me that why secondary has more relative abundance than primary?

  • @nazlikianersi727
    @nazlikianersi727 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    it was usefull

  • @mukesh2400
    @mukesh2400 ปีที่แล้ว

    super

  • @kondwanimwafulilwa5521
    @kondwanimwafulilwa5521 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    👏👏

  • @drbalvindertalwar4749
    @drbalvindertalwar4749 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍

  • @s.k.sameer2219
    @s.k.sameer2219 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where 0.055 value come plz someone help me????

    • @girlish911
      @girlish911 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      were trying to see how tall the M+1 peak is compared to the M Peak, so we mark our M peak as being 100% (it is 100% of its own height) we took the height of the M+1 peak (by viewing the vertical axis in this spectroscopy -in this case, we cant see it) and we divided it by the height of the M peak. That number is where the 0.055 is where that number comes from

    • @koningA
      @koningA 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      5 carbons = 5 x 0.011 = 0.055 (Natural abundance of C-13 is 0.011 % ). Because the chance on 2 C-13 is negligible (0.0001%) this peak wasn't shown.

  • @s.k.sameer2219
    @s.k.sameer2219 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why value pridict0.055......

    • @comedydiary5988
      @comedydiary5988 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a given value for each isotope...

  • @shyamdedaniya2056
    @shyamdedaniya2056 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    literally great explanation than useless university PhD Professor

  • @mohammada4523
    @mohammada4523 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What the fuck this is amazing, thank you so so so so so so so so so so so fucking much

  • @namae270
    @namae270 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    why isnt the M+1 ion due to hydrogen isotopes? how exactly do you guys know m+1 peak is due to carbon isotopes?

  • @tusharmandge2899
    @tusharmandge2899 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir