Thank you for the values. I love Lazarus's cognitive mediation. If there is no cognition for example we are asleep so we would not be afraid of bare and so the sensation, emotion, and physiological response would not happen. please notice the difference could be milliseconds(1/1000 OF A SECOND WOW VERY SHORT TIME) that is why without MRI AND ACCURATE MEASUREMENT WE COULD NOT SAY FOR SURE BY OUR OWN SENSES OR JUDGEMENTS. OUR SENSATION IS THROUGHTelectro-chemical movement then the brain orders slower back up hormone()endocrinology remember again millisecond, then the body's nervous system responds as this is our survival mechanism to get us out so we can survive and produce( the evaluation bit). thank you for the enlightenment. Life Coach Davoud here with love.
Crazy how in 2024 I’m in college learning about this in Brain and Behavior but neither the book nor the professor mentioned the most reasonable theory, the Lazarus Cognitive Mediational theory (stimulus, cognitive appraisal, feel emotion, physical response).
This was fascinating to watch! I believe all the theories, LOL. If I alter stimuli, I recognize different patterns for myself. Like the bear as stimulus gives me #Schachter whereas a robber would make me feel #CannonBard
Why a Theory of Emotion from 1897 may be the correct one after all The colors of the rainbow do not begin to reflect all of the infinite hues of reflected light. However, the myriad colors of the world are not separate things, but are in truth admixtures of three primary colors, red, yellow, and blue. This simple conceptual scheme provided the explanation of color that made the replication of color easy, to the delight no doubt of interior decorators the world over. Deriving complex structure from elemental processes is foundational to all the physical and biological sciences, and like the metaphors of disease and space and time, can encapsulate a world view in a phrase. However, feelings or affective states have not been so tractable, though an early psychologist would demur. He was the late 19th century psychologist Wilhelm Wundt, the founder of experimental psychology. Wundt wanted to know the rudiments of felt experience, or affect, and his aim was to see if affect, like color, can be derived from rudimentary components. Wundt believed that the affective components of the human mind could be determined by rigorously objective introspection. That is, he thought that affect or feelings could be broken down (or reduced) to their basic elements without sacrificing any of the properties of the whole. Wundt’s introspection was not a casual affair, but a highly practiced form of self-examination. He trained his students to make observations that were free from the bias of personal interpretation or previous experience, and used the results to develop a theory of affect which derived from three bi-polar dimensions. According to Wundt: “In this manifold of feelings… it is nevertheless possible to distinguish certain different chief directions, including certain affective opposites of predominant character.” Wundt identified three bipolar dimensions whose permutations comprised moment to moment affective states: (i) pleasurable versus un-pleasurable, (ii) arousing versus subduing, and (iii) strain versus relaxation. An attentive reader would note that strain versus relaxation also reflect unpleasant and pleasant affective states, however these states differ from our workaday pleasures and pains because they are continuously rather than intermittently present. So, with this new perspective, Wundt in effect postulated one discrete and two continuous affective dimensions. For example, a delicious meal or touching a hot pan are pleasurable and un-pleasurable states that occur discretely, however the relative activity of the covert musculature is continuous, as is our moment-to-moment state of alertness, or attentive arousal. For Wundt, the affective modalities or pleasure and arousal and their respective intensity were features or qualities of the simple feelings that arise from internal bodily sensations. People are, wrote Wundt, never in a state entirely free from feeling. What Wundt did not know and could not know at the time due to the rudimentary observational tools then available was the source of arousal and pleasure, which are respectively due to the activity of mid-brain dopaminergic and opioid systems. The neuromodulator dopamine elicits a feeling of alertness and energy, but not pleasure, and is induced through the experience and anticipation of novel positive events. On the other hand, opioids are responsible for pleasure, and are elicited in very small regions or ‘hot spots’ in the brain by exteroceptive (food, drink) and interoceptive stimuli (relaxation). Finally, arousal and pleasure are not just complementary but synergistic. In other words, pleasure stimulates arousal, and arousal stimulates pleasure. This reflects the fact that the neuronal assemblies or nuclei that induce dopaminergic and opioid activity abut each other in the midbrain, and when individually activated can have synergistic effects, or dopamine-opioid interactions. This can explain why high arousal and pleasure, or ecstatic, peak, or ‘flow’ experiences, correspond to novel and ‘meaningful’ experiences during relaxed states. If we map the continuous affective dimensions of Wundt’s proposal to each other, when informed by affective neuroscience, Wundt’s color wheel can bloom, and account for and predict different affective states. The vertical axis would represent dopaminergic activity, from high to low, whereas the horizontal axis would represent the degree of covert neuro-muscular activation, or muscular tension, again from high to low. High arousal would be felt as a sense of energy or alertness, and low arousal would be felt as a sense of lethargy or depression. High tension would be felt as anxiety or nervousness, and low tension would be felt as a pleasurable state of calm or relaxation. Mapping these affective events to their physiological correlates gives us emergent subjective states that match the emotional labels of our affective wheel, or an ‘emotional circumplex’. Thus ‘elation’, or a state of pleasure and arousal would occur when arousal is high and tension is low, ‘frustration’ would reflect high arousal and high tension, ‘worry’ would reflect low arousal and high tension, and ‘relaxation’ would correspond to low arousal and low tension. And so with a little tinkering of Wundt’s proposal, his observations are correct after all, and perhaps as the affective wheel turns can help psychologists arrange the colors of emotion in ways that would do interior decorators of the soul proud. From www.doctormezmer.com/post/the-colors-of-affect For a more detailed analysis of Wundt’s work and how is accurate introspection can map to simple neurological truths, see pp. 47-56 in my little book linked below and on my website on the history and implications of the neuropsychology of incentive motivation. www.scribd.com/document/495438436/A-Mouse-s-Tale-a-practical-explanation-and-handbook-of-motivation-from-the-perspective-of-a-humble-creature
Hello, that was very well explained. Reviewing at the end was greatly helpful in learning too. Thank you. I hope you are making more videos on psychology lessons/topics.
Always thought two factor theory made sense the most. Maybe I'm biased as it was one of the very first thing I learned about emotions or psychology itself.
our emotional arousal depends on both physiological changes and the cognitive or mental interpretation of those changes. cognitive process controls how we interpret our feelings. without conscious effort our innate tendency take the charges of the entire limbic system for the sake of survival. but the cognitive interpretation or conscious effort can changes those feelings triggered by both physiological and cerebral responses.
3:25 ...oh. lol, I was comparing JL to CB theory and thinking like stimulus ➡️ why this is a problem i.e. a known danger is here and my life might be in danger ➡️ BOTH simultaneously as the result of the *danger* conclusion-- and then you flipped to SS and my thoughts got illustrated 🤭 maybe that's the camp I'm in 4:05 okay now idk I just know I'm in the Cognitive Appraisal camps
All this time I thought when I press the link, there is one test with plenty of item. I’m kinda disappointed that there isn’t really a test for Psycchology - Theories of Emotion, but the links will give you random tests but still psychological in nature. Hmm. 😕
I think these are all a little true and false at the same time. One thing we know in psychology is that the prefrontal cortex isn't in charge of decision making. It, often times, rationalizes the decision. So if you find yourself feeling scared you then come up with a reason to explain the fear. BUUUT you can also see something, realize it is a threat, and that sets off a chain reaction in your body which causes fear. I think there's more than one potential route involved in the creation experience an emotion.
@@LearnMyTest What was the name of the guy who did the study... He could effectively predict if someone was gonna twitch his left hand or right hand... Before even the knew which hand they were gonna twitch. Then he used a probe to make them twitch the opposite hand than the one they were about to twitch.. He later said something like "I noticed you twitched this hand when the brain scan indicated you were gonna twitch the other had... Know why?" They answered simply "I guess I just changed my mind." Shouldn't it have felt weird that their body was literally hijacked? That they did the opposite what they intended? Seemed perfectly natural to them.
Absolutely amazing, just helped me master a whole class in 6 min 😂
This is exactly what I was looking for - well done.
Thanks for watching!
Same here... This kind of explanation is what I want in every topic... It really makes us interested and want to learn more
After reading my notes and watching countless of videos on this, your video is the best. Great explanation and I’m gonna take your practice test
YOUR EFFORT MADE MY CONCEPTS CRYSTAL CLEAR ! THANK YOU
Thank you for the values. I love Lazarus's cognitive mediation. If there is no cognition for example we are asleep so we would not be afraid of bare and so the sensation, emotion, and physiological response would not happen. please notice the difference could be milliseconds(1/1000 OF A SECOND WOW VERY SHORT TIME) that is why without MRI AND ACCURATE MEASUREMENT WE COULD NOT SAY FOR SURE BY OUR OWN SENSES OR JUDGEMENTS. OUR SENSATION IS THROUGHTelectro-chemical movement then the brain orders slower back up hormone()endocrinology remember again millisecond, then the body's nervous system responds as this is our survival mechanism to get us out so we can survive and produce( the evaluation bit). thank you for the enlightenment. Life Coach Davoud here with love.
thank you so much for this video. i really understand this lesson much better. a big help for a first year psych student like me. 💗
Thanks so much for watching! 😁
Same
This is so clear! Better than all the MCAT prep books I've seen.
Good luck on the MCAT! I hope you destroy it 💪
Crazy how in 2024 I’m in college learning about this in Brain and Behavior but neither the book nor the professor mentioned the most reasonable theory, the Lazarus Cognitive Mediational theory (stimulus, cognitive appraisal, feel emotion, physical response).
Lazarus's theory is definitely better than others and is the most LOGICAL ONE unlike others which lack LOGIC
I agree!
@@LearnMyTest Bro, to which country you belong and how old are you?
I am 33 and from the USA. you?
@@LearnMyTest I am 17 years and from INDIA. Your Donald Trump is right now in our country 😀❤️
Lazarus FTW.
I'm currently reviewing for my Personal Development class exams. Thank you! This video helped me a lot.
🤩 awesome! Thank you so much for watching! 😊
@@LearnMyTestwhere is the link of practising your tests
Was preparing for my exams and was finding theories of emotions in TH-cam.......... The way you explained helped me
This video is so frutifull to understanding the theories of emotion and I also request you to make videos on the theroies of personlaity
Thank you soo much sir
This help me alot.. i was only bit confused in Cannon-Bard theory but because of your video i revised all these theories...
Yup its completely beneficial for me ....I am watching this half day before my exam 👉🏻👈🏻✌🏻
It is really helpful, especially the bear examples and pictures. Appriciate!
Thank you so much for watching ♥️
This is so helpful. Clear and concise.
Thank you for watching! 😃
Best video came across so far.kudos to you for explaining it in such a simpler and innovative manner.
By far the best explanation someone has given me regarding these theories.
Thanks for watching!
So happy I found this video I was so stressed out about my test because I did not understand it I get it now and feel more confident
the doubble tts in sweatting is a bitt disstracting, but I appreciate the clear, concise explanation.
this was by far the best explanation I've seen!
You just saved me, for my BA's first xms exact before xms❤❤❤❤❤
this is the best video on youtube about all these types of theory's thank you so much
This was fascinating to watch! I believe all the theories, LOL. If I alter stimuli, I recognize different patterns for myself. Like the bear as stimulus gives me #Schachter whereas a robber would make me feel #CannonBard
Lazarus theory makes sense
Thank you for this, it's so helpful.
The best video on theories of emotions🎉❤
Very clear explanation ,thank you
Why a Theory of Emotion from 1897 may be the correct one after all
The colors of the rainbow do not begin to reflect all of the infinite hues of reflected light. However, the myriad colors of the world are not separate things, but are in truth admixtures of three primary colors, red, yellow, and blue. This simple conceptual scheme provided the explanation of color that made the replication of color easy, to the delight no doubt of interior decorators the world over.
Deriving complex structure from elemental processes is foundational to all the physical and biological sciences, and like the metaphors of disease and space and time, can encapsulate a world view in a phrase. However, feelings or affective states have not been so tractable, though an early psychologist would demur. He was the late 19th century psychologist Wilhelm Wundt, the founder of experimental psychology. Wundt wanted to know the rudiments of felt experience, or affect, and his aim was to see if affect, like color, can be derived from rudimentary components. Wundt believed that the affective components of the human mind could be determined by rigorously objective introspection. That is, he thought that affect or feelings could be broken down (or reduced) to their basic elements without sacrificing any of the properties of the whole. Wundt’s introspection was not a casual affair, but a highly practiced form of self-examination. He trained his students to make observations that were free from the bias of personal interpretation or previous experience, and used the results to develop a theory of affect which derived from three bi-polar dimensions. According to Wundt: “In this manifold of feelings… it is nevertheless possible to distinguish certain different chief directions, including certain affective opposites of predominant character.”
Wundt identified three bipolar dimensions whose permutations comprised moment to moment affective states: (i) pleasurable versus un-pleasurable, (ii) arousing versus subduing, and (iii) strain versus relaxation. An attentive reader would note that strain versus relaxation also reflect unpleasant and pleasant affective states, however these states differ from our workaday pleasures and pains because they are continuously rather than intermittently present. So, with this new perspective, Wundt in effect postulated one discrete and two continuous affective dimensions. For example, a delicious meal or touching a hot pan are pleasurable and un-pleasurable states that occur discretely, however the relative activity of the covert musculature is continuous, as is our moment-to-moment state of alertness, or attentive arousal. For Wundt, the affective modalities or pleasure and arousal and their respective intensity were features or qualities of the simple feelings that arise from internal bodily sensations. People are, wrote Wundt, never in a state entirely free from feeling.
What Wundt did not know and could not know at the time due to the rudimentary observational tools then available was the source of arousal and pleasure, which are respectively due to the activity of mid-brain dopaminergic and opioid systems. The neuromodulator dopamine elicits a feeling of alertness and energy, but not pleasure, and is induced through the experience and anticipation of novel positive events. On the other hand, opioids are responsible for pleasure, and are elicited in very small regions or ‘hot spots’ in the brain by exteroceptive (food, drink) and interoceptive stimuli (relaxation). Finally, arousal and pleasure are not just complementary but synergistic. In other words, pleasure stimulates arousal, and arousal stimulates pleasure. This reflects the fact that the neuronal assemblies or nuclei that induce dopaminergic and opioid activity abut each other in the midbrain, and when individually activated can have synergistic effects, or dopamine-opioid interactions. This can explain why high arousal and pleasure, or ecstatic, peak, or ‘flow’ experiences, correspond to novel and ‘meaningful’ experiences during relaxed states.
If we map the continuous affective dimensions of Wundt’s proposal to each other, when informed by affective neuroscience, Wundt’s color wheel can bloom, and account for and predict different affective states. The vertical axis would represent dopaminergic activity, from high to low, whereas the horizontal axis would represent the degree of covert neuro-muscular activation, or muscular tension, again from high to low. High arousal would be felt as a sense of energy or alertness, and low arousal would be felt as a sense of lethargy or depression. High tension would be felt as anxiety or nervousness, and low tension would be felt as a pleasurable state of calm or relaxation. Mapping these affective events to their physiological correlates gives us emergent subjective states that match the emotional labels of our affective wheel, or an ‘emotional circumplex’. Thus ‘elation’, or a state of pleasure and arousal would occur when arousal is high and tension is low, ‘frustration’ would reflect high arousal and high tension, ‘worry’ would reflect low arousal and high tension, and ‘relaxation’ would correspond to low arousal and low tension.
And so with a little tinkering of Wundt’s proposal, his observations are correct after all, and perhaps as the affective wheel turns can help psychologists arrange the colors of emotion in ways that would do interior decorators of the soul proud.
From www.doctormezmer.com/post/the-colors-of-affect
For a more detailed analysis of Wundt’s work and how is accurate introspection can map to simple neurological truths, see pp. 47-56 in my little book linked below and on my website on the history and implications of the neuropsychology of incentive motivation.
www.scribd.com/document/495438436/A-Mouse-s-Tale-a-practical-explanation-and-handbook-of-motivation-from-the-perspective-of-a-humble-creature
content of your videos is really good . i really appreciate your work. thank you
Thank you so much! I'm glad you enjoyed and thank you for watching!
Your clarifications are awesome and made me to subscribed your channel
Amazing one ❤
Thankyou for such a good explanation.
My goodness ! this video is really helpful ..thankyou so much Sir . please do more videos like this.
Helpful theory👍
Yes very insightful
Which is being appraised in the S-S theory? is it the stressor, the physiological arousal, or both?
Hello, that was very well explained. Reviewing at the end was greatly helpful in learning too. Thank you. I hope you are making more videos on psychology lessons/topics.
Hopefully soon, once I get some more time. Thank you so much for watching! :-)
Always thought two factor theory made sense the most. Maybe I'm biased as it was one of the very first thing I learned about emotions or psychology itself.
Easy to understand. Thanks
Thanks for watching!
Video was beautiful...
But where is is the Lindsey activation theory of emotions???
Thanks for explaining such a beautiful way☺️
I just burbed in AP Pychology class iin secoind semestwer. And I scared myself! 😱😱😱😱😱😱
Thank you a lot for this helpful, clear and well described video.
Thank you so much for watching!
Thank you for this informative video! Succinct and clear! :)
Short and informative, well done ✨♥️
Absolutely useful,thanks you for such a thoughtful and wonderful explanation!
Good explanation, thanks
Awesome job!! I finally get it :-)
our emotional arousal depends on both physiological changes and the cognitive or mental interpretation of those changes. cognitive process controls how we interpret our feelings. without conscious effort our innate tendency take the charges of the entire limbic system for the sake of survival. but the cognitive interpretation or conscious effort can changes those feelings triggered by both physiological and cerebral responses.
Why your channel has less subscribers i wish i add thousands of subscribers to your channel your explanation is just awesome 😇
That's so nice! Thank you so much for watching and subscribing 😃
Appreciated
Sencu from Uganda
this is really awsome explanation... more than awsome
Great video! Couldn’t have explained the theories better :)))
Thanks for watching! Glad you liked it!
Thank you So much bro for this wonderful explanation ❤
Well explained and very helpful. Great Job !!!
Thank you so much for this. It’s so helpful
Thank you
Thankyou sir,this is beautiful!
Thanks for the video 🤠🎀
Each theory Started with the stimulus of seeing, does our bodies respond the same way with hearing the stimulus?
Well explained sir👌🏻
Thank you so much, it helps me a lot
Thank you👍
thank you this video was sooo helpful
SOOO easy to understand thank you!!!!
Superb
thank you very useful
Loved this so much
Thank you so much Sir, it helped me a lot
Thank you sir 👍
are there any other example instead of bears and dogs causing the emotion fear?
sweating is one T no ..?
Thank you Sir!
Thank you so much for this! Helpful guy :)
Amazing 👏
Thank you for this video, it was very helpful.
Please correct the spelling of sweating ("sweatting").
Thanks for watching and the feedback.
thank you for this awesome video! :)
Good Video. Thank you !!!!
Thank you for watching 😀
Nice sir I like it I understood it
Thanks for watching!
This was so well done
Why no one have not made the video on Lindsey activation theory of emotions yet.
😐
sir,what about the common sense theory?
Very nice , thank you
Thankyou! very well explained.
thank you explained it better than Khan academy
Thank you so much for watching!
Thank u
Perfect
this is so helpful, thankyou :)
Thankuu
please discuss emotional wellbeing
nice video!
3:25 ...oh.
lol, I was comparing JL to CB theory and thinking like
stimulus ➡️ why this is a problem i.e. a known danger is here and my life might be in danger ➡️ BOTH simultaneously as the result of the *danger* conclusion--
and then you flipped to SS and my thoughts got illustrated 🤭 maybe that's the camp I'm in
4:05 okay now idk
I just know I'm in the Cognitive Appraisal camps
No Lisa Feldman Barrett? 🤔
nice!
I love you sir.....
good!
All this time I thought when I press the link, there is one test with plenty of item. I’m kinda disappointed that there isn’t really a test for Psycchology - Theories of Emotion, but the links will give you random tests but still psychological in nature. Hmm. 😕
Yes that is my bad. I'm going to have to find time to make quizzes for each of the individual videos.
I think these are all a little true and false at the same time. One thing we know in psychology is that the prefrontal cortex isn't in charge of decision making. It, often times, rationalizes the decision. So if you find yourself feeling scared you then come up with a reason to explain the fear.
BUUUT you can also see something, realize it is a threat, and that sets off a chain reaction in your body which causes fear.
I think there's more than one potential route involved in the creation experience an emotion.
That is incorrect. The frontal lobe is important in decision making. I would encourage you to research Phineas Gage.
@@LearnMyTest What was the name of the guy who did the study... He could effectively predict if someone was gonna twitch his left hand or right hand... Before even the knew which hand they were gonna twitch. Then he used a probe to make them twitch the opposite hand than the one they were about to twitch..
He later said something like "I noticed you twitched this hand when the brain scan indicated you were gonna twitch the other had... Know why?"
They answered simply "I guess I just changed my mind."
Shouldn't it have felt weird that their body was literally hijacked? That they did the opposite what they intended? Seemed perfectly natural to them.
where is the link?????
Did I just mastered all these theory in 6min?