I just recently learned about the Deep Water Cycle, how the way plate tectonics works with subduction zones where ocean crust sinks beneath continental crust and recycles into the mantle. Some water goes down, too, and after getting broken down into hydrogen free radicals may make its way back up to the surface via a volcanic erruption. With water cycling through the mantle, it stands to reason that coastal subduction zones have also dumped a lot of fossils into our molten recycle bin. Animals in transition between land and water would favor the coast. If that coast was EVER a subduction zone, we're unlikely to find anything cause the oldest rock was melted down before we figured out picks, shovels, or chizels.
This is one of the greatest tragedies of paleontology. There are so many fossils from the depths of the ocean and along tectonic boundaries that we'll simply never find. So many ancient life forms, forever lost to time. It makes each one we do find all the more remarkable.
I'm German. At school, I learned there is no plural for fish in English. And here I am, 47 years old, learning from a much better educated, much younger person that there are occasions to say "fishes". Life's for learning.
Growing up, i had never heard anyone use the term “fishes”, the plural was always “fish”. When we went down to the lake to go fishing, NO ONE would come back talking about how many “fishes” they caught. It wasn’t until i started watching science videos that I’ve heard the word “fishes”. I have had it explained to me once that “fish” can be singular or plural, with “fishes” being employed specifically to encompass multiple groups or classifications of fish. I cannot speak to whether or not that distinction is commonly used. I would round out my reply with: language is what it’s used to be. Definitions and connotations change all the time simply by words being used in new and different ways. Or not being used in ways it previously was employed. So there is never any harm in learning new ways a word can be used.
@Salamander_falls I'm 36, I was told as a child (circa 1996) that "fish" is the plural of one species and "fishes" is the plural of multiple species eg 16 salmon = 16 fish, 8 salmon and 8 cod = 16 fishes
@ I’ve heard that in my later years. I’m never gonna come back from a day on the lake and say “I got 12 perch and 2 trout, so i caught 14 fishes.” Lol, that seems crazy to me. I can see it when speaking of a phylogeny “the varies fishes that make up the ‘shark’ group” or whatever. But i think there’ll always be a separation for me between technical and common speech
Mummychubs. Breaths oxygen, flops on land to get from one body of water to another, highly tolerable to toxins, can survive in low oxygen water, low temps 5C to 30C. Burrows in mud to 6 inch deep to hibernate over Canadian winters. Mummychubs were the first fish in space.
@1hybodus There quite a few sources stating the Mummychug. Did you have any resources for your claim? www.google.com/search?q=first+fish+in+space&oq=first+fish+in+space&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBwgAEAAYgAQyBwgAEAAYgAQyCAgBEAAYFhgeMggIAhAAGBYYHjIICAMQABgWGB4yDQgEEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyDQgFEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyCggGEAAYgAQYogQyCggHEAAYgAQYogQyBwgIECEYjwLSAQg3ODQxajBqN6gCFLACAQ&client=ms-android-samsung-ss&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
@@stevenarseneault1972 1hybodus is right by the aforementioned technicality. Mummichogs reached space in 1973. Laika reached space in 1957. Of course, most people wouldn’t consider Laika to be a fish in the first place.
Let me guess, "The Romers Gap"? Jennifer Clack did a good job at trying to fill it in, there is a documentary on her on my early tetrapods playlist I also suggest these books for more: 'At the Waters Edge: Fish With Fingers Whales with Legs' by Carl Zimmer (awesome well rounded intro to the history of early tetrapod/proto cetacean Paleontology and Paleontologists) 'Earth Before The Dinosaurs' by Sebastian Steyer 'Your Inner Fish' by Niel Shubin 'How Vertebrates Left the Water' by Michel Laurin 'Gaining Ground' by Jennifer Clack (THE book on early Tetrapods) 'Vertebrates: Comparative Anatomy, Function, Evolution' by Kenneth Kardong
@@jora8575 I think I read a paper exploring this and coming to the theory that because there isn't an unfilled niche in their ecosystem they could fill terrestrially, they proooooobably won't survive anthropogenic climate change in time for niches to change and open up for them to do so.
I was just thinking I don't come across them as often as I used to. All the creationism, intelligent design, "teach both theories" I guess they are busy being "skeptical" about other well-established theories.
Cool ! Now if I could only grow those gills back for those increasingly lenghty humidity days. Also, i wonder if I could get those gills to filter polutants from the air. ❤ Oh, to dream. 🤣
Relatively close to Blue Beach in Nova Scotia is a place called the Joggins Fossil Cliffs. It's situated in a bay where the tides are the highest in the world, which results in erosion in the cliffs to expose fossils.
It should also be noted that the British Isles and North Eastern North America were connected around this time, as part of a subcontinent called Avalonea. This is all very amateur work on my part, so please correct me if I've missed something.
It's hard to take paleontology seriously when they name sites like Willy's Hole and reference concepts like Romer's Gap. So did Willy finally fill Romer's Gap or what?
Polypterids have been around since the devonian period. Their branching cousin was the first "fish" to become all terrestrial life. Im honestly blown away that no one even researchs the Polypterus family being that they have been traced all the back to nearly 400 million years in the fossil record and are still alive and thriving today.
My hypothesis. Usually fossils are formed when there is volcanic activity that put ashes on the ground in layers, sudden landslide that buries animals, or even a tsunami. So in order for a fish to be able to slowly evolve into land animals earth nust have been at that time very calm for a long time, thus giving the animals a chance to adapt to the new found land. Which in turn prevents fossilization because Earth was calm.
A more recent finding shows a population of tetrapods with a distinctly Romer's Gap-like morphology but which lived in seclusion for long enough to meet with early mammals. In fact they eventually took on an exoparasitic relationship with mammals in their region by obtaining sustenance from the mammal's lactation. It has been dubbed the purplenurpeton.
I tend to wonder how those Scientists find these strange places like "Willie's Hole", which is somewhere near Nodamnwhere just south of Bumfug. I mean, who was wondering out in the Badlands, dying of thirst, finding some rocks that looked a little bit like a bug and then wandered home and told somebody at the local university about it and exactly how to get there! Could the legends of the wondering Geologists be true?
my science teacher told us that you have a .1% of becoming a fossil when you die if you are in the correct environment. And then it will come down how long it will last and if it will be discovered.
Imagine finding a fossilized mudskip and know you can definitely peice together the history of the world lol I like these videos , and I'm sure we learn slot from fossils, but most things have been lost to time and simply didn't leave fossils...
I suspect that it has something to do with the bacteria development during that time, the few creatures on land at that time would die and were probably decomposing in an abnormal way or a way that leaves no fossil behind. (Slowly, or even rapidly who knows.) And because of this decomposition bacteria being under evolved and unable to properly deal with flesh bodies on land it it might have contributed to this mysterious gap in the record. - But I am not an expert or anything, I have just had this theory every since I learned that all Coal comes from before Fungus evolved to decompose wood properly, and It made me wonder if perhaps a similar phenomenon was happening with Bacteria Biomes that hadn't fully evolved enough to accommodate these new land dwelling bodies. - and after about 30 million years the bacteria would evolve to fill that hole in the ecosystem and capitalize on body decomposition leaving many more skeletons and remains behind to form fossils. - leading to the fossil Record becoming populated again. - Just a hunch from a Dinosaur/fossil nerd.
I understand the focus of this episode was on Romer's gap, but still, if discussing tetrapod evolution, why no mention of the Zachełmie tracks that were almost certainly made by a land-dwelling tetrapod and predate Tiktaalik by more than 10 million years?
Bill Wurtz's summation of that period was ... pithier. 😉 It's amazing how often he comes to mind when talking about history ... until remembering, he talked about all of it.
Or maybe their local environment changed and the ones with the most appropriate traits survived the changes, leaving the prior, perhaps more commonly dominant traits behind in the evolutionary trail.
My guess it's missing because they probably came out of the water in one tiny area that has since disappeared. I doubt it was a world wide phenomenon it go from breathing water to being able to breath air
Are there many fossils forming now? Should we be creating durable physical copies of all current species for future civilizations to discover, in case all of our research gets wiped out?
Earth never had a species like humans. But what about relatively compared to other animals. The first fish . The first hypocampus episodic memory and can recall memories at will memories routines territories . And social structures compared to slug that can barely move and have their memories really by what stimulates .but the first moble animals. Fish Quality thought we exclusive to mammals .but human are wiping out so many species . But when first early mammals appeared First 62'000 years of early mammals was worst extinction in Earth's history
Australia has been known as a hotspot for ecological discovery for more than 30 years and i can never understand why New Zealand and the prior Zealandia or whatever it was called before most of it sunk into the ocean millions of years ago, is not one... it makes sense that neighbouring countries could hold missing pieces to the whole Auzzy puzzle so to speak.. More discoveries seem to happen monthly lately and i think personally alot left to find in and around New Zealand but also in between there and Australia it just makes sense. I also want marine biologists to finally find the cause of 1000s of male great whites in the oceans near New Zealands southern coasts (forgot the places name sorry 😅) Why no females? Where are the females? Ect.. Science is endlessly fun. 🎉
Title based guess! Transitional fossils are hard to find because their transitional? There are millions of the species that took over and 5 of the prototype.
My channel is dedicated to examples of the last universal common ancestor However it is a genetically superior creature , that is, seraphim My 10 minute video gives references to electrical processies that have obscured them
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 87 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องชัย vs โชคปรีชา"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YN6e7HVnekw/mqdefault.jpg)
![ร้อยพ่อพันแม่ - WanMai [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XY2pNYASEbg/mqdefault.jpg)
Start speaking a new language in 3 weeks with Babbel. Get up to 60% OFF your subscription here: bit.ly/SciShowNov
After watching the video, the title should be "we CAN find the most important fossils ever".
10:23 "finding Willy's hole right in the middle of Rhomer's Gap"
...you guys knew what you were doing
thank you willy
if i had a nickel for every time he says "Willy's Hole" I'd have 5 nickels, that's not a lot but strange it happened more than once.
He totally has a cheeky look on his face
I don't get it, can someone plz explain
@@stoneytheclownto me as a Brit, Willy is childish slang for male genitalia, and in that context, hole and gap could be innuendo too, making it funny.
Usually I get a little weirded out when people find dead animals in Willie's Hole, but I am so happy that they found these history-changing relics
All because of some damn fish wanting to live on land. I now have to worry about buying a house and taxes.
Or you can live with the spiders
No taxes in Antarctica. Build an igloo, go fishing…😊
At least you don't have to worry about sharks very much
@@nickus9119antarctica is technically forbidden land. No living, only science. Probably leaving nothing behind
@@nickus9119eat fish raw? Theres no wood 🤣
Willie's Hole is a very mature and serious place.
And it's very important that we found Willie's hole in Romer's itty bitty crevice.
😂
I just recently learned about the Deep Water Cycle, how the way plate tectonics works with subduction zones where ocean crust sinks beneath continental crust and recycles into the mantle. Some water goes down, too, and after getting broken down into hydrogen free radicals may make its way back up to the surface via a volcanic erruption.
With water cycling through the mantle, it stands to reason that coastal subduction zones have also dumped a lot of fossils into our molten recycle bin.
Animals in transition between land and water would favor the coast.
If that coast was EVER a subduction zone, we're unlikely to find anything cause the oldest rock was melted down before we figured out picks, shovels, or chizels.
Hello fellow Octopus lady enjoyer!
There are Many coasts, not just one.
That could be part of the puzzle! Something like half of coastlines are subduction zones.
This is one of the greatest tragedies of paleontology. There are so many fossils from the depths of the ocean and along tectonic boundaries that we'll simply never find. So many ancient life forms, forever lost to time. It makes each one we do find all the more remarkable.
We're all just silly fish tryna live on land
Fish aren’t real.
And trying to earn a salary. Big trues of the life.
@@North_West1Naw, that's birds
Yeah, and I'm not very good at it.
@Totalinternalreflection Take it easy. We all are just trying.
I'm German. At school, I learned there is no plural for fish in English. And here I am, 47 years old, learning from a much better educated, much younger person that there are occasions to say "fishes". Life's for learning.
I find the word fishes silly. I was taught the word fish was singular and plural. Now it has changes.
Growing up, i had never heard anyone use the term “fishes”, the plural was always “fish”. When we went down to the lake to go fishing, NO ONE would come back talking about how many “fishes” they caught.
It wasn’t until i started watching science videos that I’ve heard the word “fishes”. I have had it explained to me once that “fish” can be singular or plural, with “fishes” being employed specifically to encompass multiple groups or classifications of fish. I cannot speak to whether or not that distinction is commonly used.
I would round out my reply with: language is what it’s used to be. Definitions and connotations change all the time simply by words being used in new and different ways. Or not being used in ways it previously was employed. So there is never any harm in learning new ways a word can be used.
@Salamander_falls I'm 36, I was told as a child (circa 1996) that "fish" is the plural of one species and "fishes" is the plural of multiple species eg 16 salmon = 16 fish, 8 salmon and 8 cod = 16 fishes
@ I’ve heard that in my later years. I’m never gonna come back from a day on the lake and say “I got 12 perch and 2 trout, so i caught 14 fishes.” Lol, that seems crazy to me. I can see it when speaking of a phylogeny “the varies fishes that make up the ‘shark’ group” or whatever. But i think there’ll always be a separation for me between technical and common speech
Fishes = different kinds of fishes
"Which is why it was so awesome to find Willie's Hole right in the middle of Romer's Gap." I'm sorry. Very sorry. I'm so immature.
Stefan, that's some fine reporting for a fish! Well done!
Mummychubs. Breaths oxygen, flops on land to get from one body of water to another, highly tolerable to toxins, can survive in low oxygen water, low temps 5C to 30C. Burrows in mud to 6 inch deep to hibernate over Canadian winters. Mummychubs were the first fish in space.
Phylogenetically speaking, canis familiaris (Laika) was the first fish in space since all tetrapods are lobe-finned fish in the clade sarcopterygii
@1hybodus There quite a few sources stating the Mummychug. Did you have any resources for your claim?
www.google.com/search?q=first+fish+in+space&oq=first+fish+in+space&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBwgAEAAYgAQyBwgAEAAYgAQyCAgBEAAYFhgeMggIAhAAGBYYHjIICAMQABgWGB4yDQgEEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyDQgFEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyCggGEAAYgAQYogQyCggHEAAYgAQYogQyBwgIECEYjwLSAQg3ODQxajBqN6gCFLACAQ&client=ms-android-samsung-ss&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
@@stevenarseneault1972 1hybodus is right by the aforementioned technicality. Mummichogs reached space in 1973. Laika reached space in 1957. Of course, most people wouldn’t consider Laika to be a fish in the first place.
@@hypanusamericanus9058 I mean, if fish aren't real, can't anything be a fish?
Sorry I couldn't help myself.
@@1hybodus canis lupus familiaris*
(in a thick scottish accent)
AHCK- STAY OUHTTA WILLY'S HOLE!
Let me guess, "The Romers Gap"?
Jennifer Clack did a good job at trying to fill it in, there is a documentary on her on my early tetrapods playlist
I also suggest these books for more:
'At the Waters Edge: Fish With Fingers Whales with Legs' by Carl Zimmer (awesome well rounded intro to the history of early tetrapod/proto cetacean Paleontology and Paleontologists)
'Earth Before The Dinosaurs' by Sebastian Steyer
'Your Inner Fish' by Niel Shubin
'How Vertebrates Left the Water' by Michel Laurin
'Gaining Ground' by Jennifer Clack (THE book on early Tetrapods)
'Vertebrates: Comparative Anatomy, Function, Evolution' by Kenneth Kardong
you guessed correctly! 🌟
Mud-walkers/mud-skippers still be a-walking, so the process is repeating over and over
Could result in an alternate lungless tetrapods evolutionary line!
@@jora8575 I think I read a paper exploring this and coming to the theory that because there isn't an unfilled niche in their ecosystem they could fill terrestrially, they proooooobably won't survive anthropogenic climate change in time for niches to change and open up for them to do so.
I thought I was mature, watching educational videos. Turns out I'm very very very immature.
You're like a "baby calf just born"
here before creationists take the title out of context
I was just thinking I don't come across them as often as I used to.
All the creationism, intelligent design, "teach both theories"
I guess they are busy being "skeptical" about other well-established theories.
already quite a few comments like that
They're so dishonest
They're so dishonest
Willie's Hole helping us fill the Romer gap sounds lime some weird weird innuendo
My ass would've stayed in the primordial soup if I knew there was gonna be days like this.
Remember the Far Side cartoon, with the baseball that went up onto land?
Cool ! Now if I could only grow those gills back for those increasingly lenghty humidity days. Also, i wonder if I could get those gills to filter polutants from the air. ❤ Oh, to dream. 🤣
Willis hole is right In the middle of roamers gap? 🤔
whyd they have to -walk id rather be a silly lil fish 😭
How to return to fish please
instructions unclear: am still fish; can't breathe water
Relatively close to Blue Beach in Nova Scotia is a place called the Joggins Fossil Cliffs. It's situated in a bay where the tides are the highest in the world, which results in erosion in the cliffs to expose fossils.
It should also be noted that the British Isles and North Eastern North America were connected around this time, as part of a subcontinent called Avalonea.
This is all very amateur work on my part, so please correct me if I've missed something.
Also I have to say that all that talk about Wily's hole and Romer's gap makes me really excited.
Take a shot every time he says willys hole 😂
I counted
He says it 5 times. Drink up!
They found Willie's Hole right in the middle of Rover's Gap
Hell no I have to function today, I can't get wasted on science
Willie, Hole, Gap Crevice...Devonian rule 34?
3:37 sounds like a jackpot to me
It's hard to take paleontology seriously when they name sites like Willy's Hole and reference concepts like Romer's Gap. So did Willy finally fill Romer's Gap or what?
because it was the paleontologists who named it, and definitely not the Scots ;)
I would love to visit Willie's Hole.
Just learned about devil hole pupfish on tangents, and though OH NO NOT THEM when i saw the title image
Willy reached for comment, “15 million year old tetrapods? ‘Tisn’t the strangest thing I found in me hole…”
Land Curious?! that was so telling, wholesome - and funny! 😂
Some of the gaps could be due to geologic conditions.
so many holes and gaps
This is why paleontologists are so lucky to have found that homotherium cub :)
1:38 why does this thing have eyes pointed upwards? Is it expecting something up in the air? Did it live at the bottom of the sea?
They live in shallows.
Plate tectonics, vulcanism, episodic climate changes really suck, huh?
Just for scientists. Without them we may never have been here.
Thanks to these fish I have to go to work every day. Thanks guys.
Polypterids have been around since the devonian period. Their branching cousin was the first "fish" to become all terrestrial life. Im honestly blown away that no one even researchs the Polypterus family being that they have been traced all the back to nearly 400 million years in the fossil record and are still alive and thriving today.
We also can't find the fossils before the Cambrian "explosion" and it's WAY more than 7 million years.
Thank you for this video
If only purgatorius had gone back to the water. It worked for indohyus!
My hypothesis. Usually fossils are formed when there is volcanic activity that put ashes on the ground in layers, sudden landslide that buries animals, or even a tsunami. So in order for a fish to be able to slowly evolve into land animals earth nust have been at that time very calm for a long time, thus giving the animals a chance to adapt to the new found land. Which in turn prevents fossilization because Earth was calm.
👍⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐EXCELLENT!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR EXPLANATION. I LOOK FORWARD TO NEW VIDEOS!
A more recent finding shows a population of tetrapods with a distinctly Romer's Gap-like morphology but which lived in seclusion for long enough to meet with early mammals. In fact they eventually took on an exoparasitic relationship with mammals in their region by obtaining sustenance from the mammal's lactation. It has been dubbed the purplenurpeton.
"Willie's Hole" Chuckling like Beavis and Butthead.
Willy's hole is crazy name
I tend to wonder how those Scientists find these strange places like "Willie's Hole", which is somewhere near Nodamnwhere just south of Bumfug. I mean, who was wondering out in the Badlands, dying of thirst, finding some rocks that looked a little bit like a bug and then wandered home and told somebody at the local university about it and exactly how to get there! Could the legends of the wondering Geologists be true?
Invertebrates wouldn't cause that kind of predicament!
I need to see the bloopers for this episode
I love fossil hunting here in NS
my science teacher told us that you have a .1% of becoming a fossil when you die if you are in the correct environment. And then it will come down how long it will last and if it will be discovered.
Imagine finding a fossilized mudskip and know you can definitely peice together the history of the world lol
I like these videos , and I'm sure we learn slot from fossils, but most things have been lost to time and simply didn't leave fossils...
I suspect that it has something to do with the bacteria development during that time, the few creatures on land at that time would die and were probably decomposing in an abnormal way or a way that leaves no fossil behind. (Slowly, or even rapidly who knows.) And because of this decomposition bacteria being under evolved and unable to properly deal with flesh bodies on land it it might have contributed to this mysterious gap in the record. - But I am not an expert or anything, I have just had this theory every since I learned that all Coal comes from before Fungus evolved to decompose wood properly, and It made me wonder if perhaps a similar phenomenon was happening with Bacteria Biomes that hadn't fully evolved enough to accommodate these new land dwelling bodies. - and after about 30 million years the bacteria would evolve to fill that hole in the ecosystem and capitalize on body decomposition leaving many more skeletons and remains behind to form fossils. - leading to the fossil Record becoming populated again. - Just a hunch from a Dinosaur/fossil nerd.
I’m a TETRAPOD! 😆
You never mentioned Miguasha. It happens to be a world heritage site .
I understand the focus of this episode was on Romer's gap, but still, if discussing tetrapod evolution, why no mention of the Zachełmie tracks that were almost certainly made by a land-dwelling tetrapod and predate Tiktaalik by more than 10 million years?
"the most important fossil ever". Me, a plant biologist
Plants kind of suck at fossilizing, don’t they?
Archaeopteris Archaeopteryx Archaeopteris Archaeopteryx Archaeopteris Archaeopteryx 😂
Archaeopteris Archaeopteryx Archaeopteris Archaeopteryx Archaeopteris Archaeopteryx 😂
Nah, there are a lot of plant fossils, check out Archaeopteris (NOT Archaeopteryx)
@@zlodevil426
Nah, there are a lot of plant fossils, check out Archaeopteris (NOT Archaeopteryx)
Bill Wurtz's summation of that period was ... pithier. 😉
It's amazing how often he comes to mind when talking about history ... until remembering, he talked about all of it.
Or maybe their local environment changed and the ones with the most appropriate traits survived the changes, leaving the prior, perhaps more commonly dominant traits behind in the evolutionary trail.
That was a REALLY long trip to a mediocre, but still appreciated, pun.
The NAMES in this video??? TikToklick?? Pederpes?? Willie’s Hole??
My guess it's missing because they probably came out of the water in one tiny area that has since disappeared. I doubt it was a world wide phenomenon it go from breathing water to being able to breath air
Those damn fish are responsible for life that I currently live in
After watching the video, the title should be "we CAN find the most important fossils ever".
Are there many fossils forming now? Should we be creating durable physical copies of all current species for future civilizations to discover, in case all of our research gets wiped out?
So what was all that about enlarged holes and tight cracks?
(Ghost World)
The fossils are hiding because they paved the way to the birth of Earth's destroyers. XD
Well were early ones heavy in cartilage than bone, with bones being a later development since they would be better for walking....
Have you checked between your couch cushions?
Ever heard of a mudskipper? Or any amphibian?
Earth never had a species like humans. But what about relatively compared to other animals. The first fish . The first hypocampus episodic memory and can recall memories at will memories routines territories . And social structures compared to slug that can barely move and have their memories really by what stimulates .but the first moble animals. Fish Quality thought we exclusive to mammals .but human are wiping out so many species . But when first early mammals appeared First 62'000 years of early mammals was worst extinction in Earth's history
"Excavations at Willie's hole revealed..."
🤨
Australia has been known as a hotspot for ecological discovery for more than 30 years and i can never understand why New Zealand and the prior Zealandia or whatever it was called before most of it sunk into the ocean millions of years ago, is not one... it makes sense that neighbouring countries could hold missing pieces to the whole Auzzy puzzle so to speak..
More discoveries seem to happen monthly lately and i think personally alot left to find in and around New Zealand but also in between there and Australia it just makes sense.
I also want marine biologists to finally find the cause of 1000s of male great whites in the oceans near New Zealands southern coasts (forgot the places name sorry 😅)
Why no females? Where are the females? Ect..
Science is endlessly fun. 🎉
Imagine if sharks started to walk on land .. 🦈
Title based guess! Transitional fossils are hard to find because their transitional? There are millions of the species that took over and 5 of the prototype.
do you think willie or rhomer is the uke?
Stupid fish should have known that this would eventually lead to a runaway greenhouse effect and/or nuclear armagedon 😑
Lol, so the missing link is a fish!
I wonder how many won’t get the “mind the gap” joke at the end…
Oh man I was quick today
I wasn't and still was 3rd stfu
@@travisburkley23 you weren't 3rd
not Willie's hole
I have them, they've been sitting in my closet for a while
Silly fishes wanted to be humans little do they know we're devolving into crabs.
Layund Fish?
those tetrapods changed their names cuz they did not want to be found
"Land curious"
The FBI (Fossil Bureau of Information) has blackened a few million years of pages. Again.
I don't mind the gap either
Willies hole and roamers gap😅
Did you check under there?
Ok i got bored, wanna go draw an ivhniosaurus😅😅.
My channel is dedicated to examples of the last universal common ancestor
However it is a genetically superior creature , that is, seraphim
My 10 minute video gives references to electrical processies that have obscured them
Excuses are mountains of nothingness
Willy's hole, really?
A hole in the gap? 🤔
So our ancestors were fishy...
Where the fossils going from fish to ape??
Sowwy, i eated them all😖😖