Physics 35 Coulomb's Law (7 of 8) Example 3 (Challenging Problems)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @ajob_kaktarua
    @ajob_kaktarua 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    At 4:40, we have
    Q1-Q2=something,
    Q1*Q2=something.
    Now, we know that,
    // (Q1+Q2) square = (Q1-Q2) square + 4*Q1*Q2 //
    We now have the value of both, (Q1+Q2) & (Q1-Q2).
    Q1 & Q2 can be determined easily!
    Simple calculation!

    • @namanbartia6845
      @namanbartia6845 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes i did it in the same way🤗

  • @pi_rand4266
    @pi_rand4266 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir, great to see your lectures ...you are awesome...........
    Sir actually this method involves a lot of calculations....instead we can find the ratio b/n charges ie Q1*Q2=4Q3^2....
    As we know when the charges are touched .charges ae transferred till they are of same charges....ie Q1=Q3+x and Q2 = Q3-x
    now we can equate and finally get the answer......
    THANK YOU SIR !

  • @oszkarbiro2029
    @oszkarbiro2029 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sir, first of all thank you for your videos even in 2021. I have a remark though, wouldn't be simpler if we've just express Q1 as Q2/C1? The we can substitute this into the equation of (Q1-Q2)^2=4C2. We get a relief of a little bit shorter algebra, and since we do not lose any roots the solution will be exactly the same. Can it be a mistake to suppose that either Q1 or Q2 cannot be zero?

  • @jatinrathore3997
    @jatinrathore3997 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sir,if Q2 is also a positive charge but with a lesser magnitude than Q1 then what will Q3 be equal to?Will it be Q1+Q2/2?

  • @SantanaSummer
    @SantanaSummer 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was so helpful! 🙌 thanks you the man

  • @RiyaTomar-jd3mw
    @RiyaTomar-jd3mw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir, if the negative charge has a greater magnitude than the positive the remainder would contain the negative charges, right?? because then it would be Q2-Q1.
    Also, when two charges are brought in contact is it induction....when the charges are neutralized?

  • @xvgx
    @xvgx 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why when finding out F1, you multipy Q1 and Q2. But for F2, you are squaring Q3? I thought you had to multiply the two q's( Q1 and Q3) to find F2.

    • @phattirap.2907
      @phattirap.2907 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought so and want about the direction of Q3 and Q1?

  • @Mushyrulez
    @Mushyrulez 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You didn't add 5 of 5 into the playlist!

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mushyrulez That is right. I had forgotten about that video. Thanks

  • @a7prabhat21
    @a7prabhat21 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir i am belongs to india🇮🇳. And I just watch this vedio totally change my mind 🙏🙏

  • @umukunzitimothee9
    @umukunzitimothee9 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank you sir, your videos are more helpful. I was just less in engineering physics, few days after watching your videos, i totally improved. but sir where I can get your PDF notes,I hope it will help me more. thank you.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      At this time, there are no PDF notes available.

    • @umukunzitimothee9
      @umukunzitimothee9 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oooh!, no matter though it would help me. I will keep following your videos. Fortunately I will know more. May I have your email address?

  • @nikhilwardrobe
    @nikhilwardrobe 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    When you will be adding the fifth video?

  • @phuti3031
    @phuti3031 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    could you please explain the neutralizing q2 part why did you minus and not plus and why are you neutralizing q2

    • @phuti3031
      @phuti3031 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      please if possible explain in simple terms

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Some of the excess positive charge of Q1 cancelled out the negative charge of Q2. The remainder positive charge of Q1 is then equally distributed among both 1 and 2

  • @shirus100
    @shirus100 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, thank you so mach for the video!
    you do (Q1-Q2)/2=Q3 because one of the charges is negative and the other one is possitive?

  • @a7prabhat21
    @a7prabhat21 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ❤❤❤❤❤

  • @ahmedhamed-fm3um
    @ahmedhamed-fm3um 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks , but why (Q1_Q2)/2=Q3???

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Q1-Q2 is the remaining charge after they are added together. Then the remaining charge is divided equally between the two object (each getting half of the net charge that is left).

  • @hypnotize8155
    @hypnotize8155 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    When the video is at 6:30, you are adding 4C2( 4 c subscript 2) + 2C1 (2 c subscript 1)= C3 (c subscript 3), how?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sana,
      Sometimes the equation becomes "messy" and it is difficult to see what to do next.
      Replacing a more complicated part of the equation with a simple substitution makes it easier to complete the problem.
      You just have to re-substitute the original expression back in when you are done