Fugitive Detective Reviews Manhunt Scenes, from 'Joker' to 'Thelma & Louise' | Vanity Fair
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 มิ.ย. 2024
- Retired fugitive detective fact checks manhunt scenes from movies including 'Joker,' 'The Fugitive,' 'The Legend of Billie Jean,' 'Dirty Harry,' 'Catch Me If You Can,' 'Thelma & Louise,' 'The Bourne Ultimatum,' 'The Boondock Saints' and 'U.S. Marshals' and analyzes their probability, craft, and execution.
Detective Chris Anderson is from ID’s Reasonable Doubt.
Still haven’t subscribed to Vanity Fair on TH-cam? ►► bit.ly/2z6Ya9M
ABOUT VANITY FAIR
Arts and entertainment, business and media, politics, and world affairs-Vanity Fair’s features and exclusive videos capture the people, places, and ideas that define modern culture.
Fugitive Detective Reviews Manhunt Scenes, from 'Joker' to 'Thelma & Louise' | Vanity Fair - บันเทิง
![ความรักของยักษ์เขียว (ทศกัณฐ์) - เดี่ยว ไออุ่น [OFFICIAL MUSICVIDEO 4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yCCy-QVHqK8/mqdefault.jpg)
You know back in his prime this dude totally chased down fugitives and said some cool and relevant line as he was cuffing them.
He was like a young Captain Holt in his day
@@TheOneManWhoBeatYou NINE-NINE
Shaft
“Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill.”
I jerked off and then cried. It a bad day at the truck stuff.
I need to include "tactical error" in my vocabulary more often
no factor
Teacher: “this essay is filled with typos! Why did you make such a badly written essay?
Me: sorry, it was a tactical error
@@zxp3ct3r41 I see you've met Jocko🤣
Jjiiklvxcct
I did, and my friends have been calling me agent 007 ever since.
Why this guy lit like a borderlands character?
Video contrast turned up too high in post-processing.
I didn't know what you meant at first but then I was wow! You're right!
because there's a pandemic going around and they are working with what they have.
it kinda looks like a deepfake. also unrelatedly there are very few comments for the amount of views the video has
came to the comments looking for this
"I'm innocent!"
"I don't care."
sums it up doesn't it
In theory police are supposed to arrest, that is take into custody, any suspect, and once they're clearly not a suspect they should be released without charges. But it's hard to say how often that actually happens since we've been shown evidence that police will and do fabricate charges on people they arrest for no reason, I guess to make themselves not look like idiots or something, not really sure what goes through the minds of corrupt cops.
The Fugitive is one of the best thrillers ever
Cops in a nutshell.
@@EricLing64 that I never got they have 72 hour holding unless they manage to get patriot act on which let’s just say no dirty cop with that power would use it on something like that and it goes to court the cop would look so dumb in front of all the people in the court room if it even reaches court so I would say looking better safe than sorry is better than trying to press charges with not even circumstantial evidence.
One correction. In Joker, they definitely jumped on the cops, because they knew they were cops.
Twas a "tactical error" on his part
I love the way he pronounces Tommy Lee Jones as one word like Tommillyjoans.
His full name is Tommillyjoans Lee Jones, that's why.
But...that’s how it’s pronounced?
@@markfelix8737 😂😭
Amyqotd yep
I deadass was reading your comment when he said Tommillyjones
Another good expert video. You can hear the hesitation in his voice when he talks about police shooting fleeing suspects
then again acab
Abab ajab
@@kitenoticing yo chill
@@kitenoticing Applied Biochemistry And Biotechnology? American Journal of Agriculture and Biology?... I genuinely don't know what those two abbreviations represent.
What about what he said about Dirty Harry?
Tommy Lee Jones even felt like his character pulling out his gun and shooting at Harrison Ford's character, especially in a crowded building, felt out of character.
Next one should be “ghost/demon reviews scenes in horror movies”
Lmao bring in Queen Elizabeth
I've fallen into a black hole of these videos....and I love it!!!
11:34 Tom Hanks' "Hey! Oh god-dammit" is a phrase I still use to this day. It's so great.
I love that line. It's hilarious the way he says it.
@@Arch3an It just applies in so many circumstances
"You thinking what I'm thinking partner?"
"Aim for the bushes"
"Fugitive Detective" kinda sounds like a fancy word for bounty hunter
Bounty Hunter works for the Bail Company. Fugitive Detective is a police officer charged with tracking fugitives.
He's also a homicide detective he's on a bunch of The First 48 seasons
Harry Stotle yea bounty hunters have a bad reputation. There know for breaking the rules. They are civilians acting like cops without cop training
@@Tker1970 Thank you.
Bounty hunters are civillians who go after people who jumped bail. This guy seems like law enforcement who goes after people to bring them in to be charged.
When it came to _Joker_ I thought he was going to mention how unlikely it was that only two cops in all of Gotham knew that Arthur Fleck was a person of interest, and how no other cops were sent after him after those two cops were incapacitated _until_ he committed a murder on live TV.
True facts: the last scene is exactly how Wesley snipes tried to escape the IRS
wow where u there?
lol
7:57 this lady's screams sound like an awkward game audio trigger
The audience wants the noise to stop and for the woman to be pistol whipped like that. It's deliberate by the filmmakers
Regarding the Joker movie; I believe the passengers knew these guys are Policemen. There had been riots between the Public and the Police if I recall correctly.
Chris Anderson was interesting, please bring him back for more.
He’s in first 48
To be fair, in the Bourne movies they aren't exactly cops; they're spooks. Unrelatedly, it's really interesting to see how some of the spectacle isn't just made up.
What does that even mean
@@shadymcnasty5920 people involved in espionage. Usually CIA.
I love these breakdowns, I wish there was more of them lol
The Fugitive is one of the best thrillers ever
Thank you! It's my favourite movie but whenever I mention it no one knows what I'm talking about ;-;
Watched it yesterday lol. I love Harrison but I didn't think the movie was that good. Maybe it's because the plot twist has become so common....
It is
Not even remotely
/ MOVIES IN GENERAL
"No officer can use lethal force to take into custody a fleeting fugitive."
Say what? Do US police know about this law? Somebody really needs to tell them.
Lethal*
There are some major caveats he did not mention. In this case the fugitive is not suspected to be armed. Many cases seen on the news involve suspects with a weapon or who are known to be dangerous. If those people are fleeing towards people whom they might harm or take hostage then officers are legally allowed to stop that threat. If lethal means are the only way to stop that threat then that is what an officer is allowed to do. What this guy said is not wrong but he was only referring to the particular case at hand where lethal force was obviously not legally justified. Shooting that man does not stop an actual threat to the officer or others.
Jonathan Fairchild The cases that really make the news, and that justifiably spark outrage and protests, are the many cases where police have shot unarmed suspects multiple times giving reasons that include: 1/ he was fleeing 2/ he was moving towards us 3/ he moved his hand towards his waistband 4/ he was resisting 5/ he flinched 6/ etc. etc. In short, pretty much any reason seems to be enough for police to shoot and kill unarmed suspects. What this guy says may be true on paper, but as I said, someone needs to tell the police about it. Oh, and what do you mean “Shooting that man does not stop a threat to officers or others”?
@@mydogdeli I hate to break it to you but you can survive a gunshot. In us there were only a few unarmed shootings last year and almost all it was dark out and they pointed something at the cops, they pulled a fake gun out, etc. Its a terrible thing but its not this daily thing that happens daily.
TopHatPenguin Cops are trained to shoot at the mid-body and to keep shooting “until the threat is stopped”, which is why victims will be hit at least 8 times, often more. Hate to break it to you, but would you survive that? Yeah, thought
not.
Notice how he says it ‘shouldn’t happen’ that an officer fires a weapon at a fleeing fugitive, not ‘it doesn’t happen’. Sad world we live in…
brave and thought-provoking comment
5:31 when talking about Tennessee V. Gardner.
He is right and wrong. Where he is wrong is they are allowed to use deadly force against a fleeing suspect if the officer reasonably believes the person fleeing will cause serious bodily injury or death to another if the suspect does escape.
This man was a homicide detective in Birmingham Alabama
I've been there
He gets my respect
He has been there and done that
I thought I heard Alabama in his voice.
Around 5:25 he's explains something that happens ALL THE TIME but it's illegal SMDH
so if you commit a crime and don't wanna get arrested all you need to do is run and you're untochable?
MudgateBronn untouchable , no. Alive , yes.
@@Cosdamotto Exactly. Evading arrest shouldn't be essentially a capital offense. Even if the suspect gets away, it isn't worth killing someone unless they're an immediate danger of harming others.
Joshua Davidson what if there pushing people
@@michealjackson8716 if they are pushing people you really want the police firing guns at a fugitive? They could easily hit one of the people who was being pushed out of the way.
This was a great video. I would gladly watch this man discuss several more movies. Thank you!!
The guy says phones traced or something to that effect when he knows that’s exactly what happens
My man left out the rest of Tennessee v. Garner:
“Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment, when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, the officer may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless "the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."[1]”
That's great on paper, but does it really matter? Police will still look for any excuse to say someone posed a serious threat even if they're unarmed.
@@CulturedDegenerate oh, what flavor was the Kool-Aid?
@@docsavage8640 Cherry. What color is your blindfold?
“Was it worth it? Absolutely not, he’ll never walk again.” 😂
My man from First 48!
Yep.
Tumbely Jones is a great actor. Right next to Harroldson Ford
Hahahahaaha
The detectives in Joker got plummeled hard
@@alexpaxton1336 The reactions to those detectives really ran the gambit of violent crimes we see today
Reminds me of the.. "Substitute Teacher" - Key and Peele Lmao!! A-A-Ron!
These series are so crazy to me because I grew up on that exact same tv screen
7:58 gotta love that same scream being played 3 times
“An officer doesn’t fire his weapon at someone who is just running away...”. Surprised he said that with a straight face.
I believe he said should never, not that they don't. It's something that should not happen.
@lygophile I didn't quote him exactly, but they come to mean the same thing. "It shouldn't happen" is the same as "Should never happen." He hesitates when he says it, because he knows it does, but it should (not/never) happen. They're interchangeable in this context.
Key word is "just"...generally they aren't "just" running away when they get shot
Actually shooting a fleeing felon is legal.
@@JJ-nu8qi because they’re so dangerous. Right.
as long as he had reason to believe that person is a danger to the people around him, TN v Garner says thats perfectly okay
"In 1985 Tennessee v. Garner, the Supreme Court ruled that no officer can use lethal force to subdue or take into custody a fleeing fugitive"
Yet here we are...
It doesn't count when the fugitive uses violence against officers, and/or is armed and presents a threat either to officers or to the public.
Came here to say this.
I was about to comment this too
"A fleeing *white* fugitive"
Fixed it
@@Pretzil43 Good boy. Now go back to cnn hq to get your cookie.
5:25 - few weeks ago cops killed a security guard because he simply ran away
While wielding a handgun
@@LB-ou8wt No he didn't have a gun, that's a verifiable lie.
@@DalionHeartTTV I cant find a single source that says he didn't have a gun oyher than quoting his family who wasn't on the scene insisting he didn't, and a handgun was found on the scene afterwards, so. Probably shouldn't have shot him but benefit of the doubt
@@DalionHeartTTV Verifiable by what?
Max Haupt I never get the benefit of the doubt when I shoot suspicious people in the back...
Hmm, these are very interesting tips Mr. fugitive detective..
...I'll be sure to keep these in mind...for things....
One of the better reviews! Thank you!
"1985 TN vs Garner: you shouldn't see an officer fire a weapon at a person who's simply running away"
Hes wrong you can shoot fleeing felon even says it in that case.
@@JJ-nu8qi He's not wrong but he didn't fully explain the case law, I don't blame him though, it's not his fault that the internet is full of morons who don't know anything.
He says shortly after an officer can if the suspect is a potential public danger
He was on some episodes of the First 48, that’s where I recognize him!! Respect.
I watch him on the ID series 'reasonable doubt'
Was expecting an actual fugitive to provide the commentary. Slightly disappointed
Awesome chap, thanks for the great info.
5:20 to clarify, an officer is only allowed to use lethal force against a fleeing suspect when that officer has an articulable and reasonable belief that that suspect presents a serious threat to the safety of the public or other police. I.E., suspect runs down a woman with a pipe and hits her in the head, police show up, he runs carrying the pipe... Police can shoot him while he's running because there is a high enough probability that he will injure or kill someone else if he escapes. Same goes for active shooters. The point is you can't use deadly force to stop a fleeing felon if they aren't a violent criminal who just recently committed a violent crime and may well do so again. In Tennessee V Garner, an officer shot a fleeing house burglar who wasn't known to be carrying any weapons or to have gravely harmed someone during the house robbery.
That's a great summary of it. I kind of wonder though if he didn't include that info, and that they just edited it out for time.
@@jek4837 true, very well could be the case. Just wanted to mention it if anyone was wondering/wanting more info.
Love Reasonable Doubt! The show on ID channel he’s done for years
This series of #Vanityfair are awesome 👏 more please this is good
I remember this dude was on a reality show I wanna say 08ish. It pretty much detailed how him & his team went about locating & hunting down his fugitive. I believe the name of the show was called “Manhunters”
can we get some captions on these videos, these type are my favorite
PE was never my strongest subject, I would suck at this job. 😅
imagine it your job to wrestle with huge guys that take steroids and are bigger and stronger than you, and unlike you, has absolutely nothing to lose. no thanks. not even for money. easier ways to earn a living.
Love the way he says tommy lee jones
4:41 "So, that's not a skretch of he imagination." 5:07 "That...is a skretch." What the..., lol
The US has different accents 🤷🏽♀️
@@Itsrainingcatsyall You're confusing diction with accents.
Gott get up and skretch
5:15 Wow weird, huh
Research and understanding the law is key in this instance.
Kinda crazy how stupid you are... The case law states that an officer can't use lethal force to stop a fleeing suspect if the suspect is NON-VIOLENT.
@@itb4255 they’re not stupid , just uneducated about the topic.
really great video, love this whole series. but also 2:57 this man says "blummel"
"That shouldn't happen." He had his eyes closed when he said that.
You never got me Chris!
He forgot the last part about Tennessee vs. garner either that or it was edited out. An officer cannot use lethal force to stop a fleeing suspect Unless they have reason to believe that he posses a serious threat of harming another person.
Love the old 70's filter on the Joker movie.
“You shouldn’t see an officer firing a weapon at a person who’s simply running away”... This guy must be a rookie.
Yea, I hear about it happening a lot.
Not really, he is saying it shouldn't happen, not that it doesnt happen.
It depends on the situation if you just killed someone and now you're running away yes you will be shot if you were running away 'cause your shoplifter you most of the time won't get shot cops are trained to use the use of force model which says if you're not posing a threat you're not going to get shot.
i could listen to him for hours
Great expert perspective!
Chris was awesome!! Gotta get him back if you can!!
That's a pretty nice vase, Vanity Fair. Pretty nice.
*Tennessee V. Garner:*
"Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, a police officer may use deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect only if the officer has a good-faith belief that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."
Sounds familiar, doesn't it....
@@troy3423 no, not at all, explain please.
Harrison Ford didn’t pose a threat tho
And yet...
@@littlemar22 "fugitive"
These were pretty spot on. I'm a little disappointed that he didn't call out Bourne giving away his location. I've always hated that scene because of it.
Lots of great films. I was kinda hoping for No Country for Old Men XD
5:35 unless of course they fear that they may cause harm
3:34 so... well deserved the Oscar for Tommy
"Tomily Jones" 😂 The way he says it🤣
I own movie legend I Billie Jane One of my favorite movies I watch it all the time Thanks for Including it
Me reading the description: YES THEY HAVE THE FUGITIVE ON HERE!
To bad they didnt have him review Seven
I was hoping he'd also review the movie Heat too
at 2:58 "They begin to plummel him"... Plummel?
Ya that was a "skretch"
lol @ how he makes the video his resume at the end
8:06 😭😭😭😭
Cool stuff.
“What is this joker not in handcuffs?” Comedy! I know that’s right!
17:30 Southie!
This guy has a show on ID. Its pretty good 👍
He got Tennessee v. Garner Bass akwards.
Nobody else is gonna talk about how Leo DiCaprio said he was the flash in catch me if you can?
cool video, thank you
I love the lady screaming her brains out at 8:00
I wish the audio quality was better.
Shoulda shown “the other guys” clip
Shouldn't happen, but happens all the time
These Skillshare courses are really getting out of hand
Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment, when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, the officer may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless "the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."
5:15 when they start enforcing that law????
17:42 "air quotes"
idk how i feel about this
Why not back up posted at exits. Radio ahead ? Tommy Lee in the stairwell
A fugitive never go to the police station? Jacques Mesrine sure did
9:33
Is that The Flash?
Yes, that's a minor plot point in the film that DiCaprio's character likes Flash comic books.
him doing outer banks would be cool too
Who knew Daniel Cormier also has an alternate career as a detective, next to his UFC career?
😂🤣😂🤣
Hunting down Bones after he ran over another woman
My man looking like he in a TellTale game
Garner point is wrong. They absolutely can use lethal force on a fleeing suspect if the suspect is a danger to others lives. Which Harrison Ford was believed to be.
After 200 million dollar heist Frank is on TH-cam.
I like the video enough but remember when Vanity Fair wasn't just buzzfeed?