This was a truly excellent series by the BBC, and in particular, their rendering of Nietzsche was spectacular if not brilliant. I think I heard a rumor that the BBC later pulled this series from their own website, as if to cover up something they had exposed.
Apply Ockham’s Razor. It’s far more likely to be a legal issue if the documentary used footage that the BBC didn’t have the rights to. Not everything is a conspiracy.
This one looks like the Nietsche one: th-cam.com/video/u9f1F5jUzaM/w-d-xo.html and this like the Heidegger one: th-cam.com/video/EDJ7Os-BNU8/w-d-xo.html
Sarte..... road to hell. " Those who are thus bewildered are attracted by demonic and atheistic views. In that deluded condition, their hopes for liberation, their fruitive activities, and their culture of knowledge are all defeated. " Bhagavad Gita chapt9 v.12
It was true, I had always realized it-I hadn’t any “right” to exist at all. I had appeared by chance, I existed like a stone, a plant, a microbe. I could feel nothing to myself but an inconsequential buzzing. I was thinking…that here we are eating and drinking, to preserve our precious existence, and that there’s nothing, nothing, absolutely no reason for existing. Jean-Paul Sartre, Nausea
sartre began to lose popularity when he questioned the colonialist objective of his own country and western/european powers. the basic questions surrounding our freedom is eternal. i think it is better to exist with the concept that we have freedom, even if it is illusory, than the concept that we dont.
If any one is interested in real philosophy they should learn from Plato, Aristole and the Scholastics( and from the Germans). This means that you should are expected to learn ancient Greek, Latin and German. The order in which you study is rational philosophy, moral philosophy and natural philosophy. I have learnt rational philosophy but indeed to skip to Natural Philosophy( part of Natural Philosophy called Metaphysics)
Nice opinion, but not everyone shares your affinity for this “real” philosophy. Just because you disagree with someone doesn’t mean they’re not a real philosopher.
@@gavinyoung-philosophy It was addressed not you(I understand you're already into studying philosophy) but those who want to get into philosophy. I think you understand qualifier "real" in a literal sense( i.e. that which makes something what it is..."doesn't mean they're not real philosper"). By "real philosophy" I meant real philosophy such that its opposite is not that which is not philosophy-as something that is of gold is opposed to something that is not of gold-but such that its opposite is that which is of philosophy but less so, as pure gold is opposed to its alloys. By philosophy I didn't mean what is meant by philosophy now( I think this is what you took it for), but what is meant by philosophy nominally. Latter necessarily pertains to wisdom in some sense. These different understanding of the the same names is due to existing outlooks towards reality that are formed from different points of view and through a different route too.
@@gavinyoung-philosophy "Nice opinion, not everyone shares your affinity for this "real" philosophy." Not everyone shares in affinity for the three divisions of thought from which philosophy stems: rational, moral and natural. Rational or Logical consists of study of arguments. For e.g. "That which casts a curved shadow is round. Since the earth casts a curved shadow on the mood during an eclipse, it is round". But since arguments are made of statements and statements are made of terms, all these are studied under Logic. Moral Philosophy studies human action and consists of monistic ethics, political ethics and domestic ethics. Natural philosophy consists of physics, psychology, metrology, metaphysics and also mathematics, astronomy and music. That no everyone shares in something doesn't mean that some don't. "Just because I disagree with someone doesn't mean that they're not a real philosopher" I didn't say disagreed with anyone. I think everyone has something to say that's related to truth. It's not like it's difficult. As the proverb says, "no one misses the door".
Sartre was a great enemy of fascism, anti-Semitism, racism and the rigid hierarchy of capitalist society. The rejection of mass murder for political reasons greatly influenced his philosophy. Existentialism is a celebration of life, freedom and the problematization of unreflective consensuses that make injustice invisible and preserved, from the political and social level to the personal and psychological level. I think he would not be able to calmly accept the genocide of Palestinian children in Gaza. Under Netanyahu's bestial government, Israel is a violent and bloodthirsty representation of the deepest denial of everything that Sartre considered good, beautiful and fair. Existentialism would now side with the Jewish rabbis who are attacked and even arrested because they dare to raise their voices against the genocide of the Palestinians promoted by Zionism with the nauseating support of the French, German, American and English authorities.
An informative talk,
good share!
This was a truly excellent series by the BBC, and in particular, their rendering of Nietzsche was spectacular if not brilliant. I think I heard a rumor that the BBC later pulled this series from their own website, as if to cover up something they had exposed.
Apply Ockham’s Razor. It’s far more likely to be a legal issue if the documentary used footage that the BBC didn’t have the rights to. Not everything is a conspiracy.
@@markofsaltburn b-but my own political agenda
@@markofsaltburnToo intellectual and eye-opening for the masses,bread and circuses is better and more enjoyable.
what a treat
Thanks, would be great if you could upload Nietzsche and Heidegger ones too.
This one looks like the Nietsche one: th-cam.com/video/u9f1F5jUzaM/w-d-xo.html and this like the Heidegger one: th-cam.com/video/EDJ7Os-BNU8/w-d-xo.html
beautiful
I am so glad another Iranian is watching this program.
زن زندگى آزادى
Is Sartre/Existentialism popular in Iran?
💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
The title is a little bit of embarrasment for the legacy of Bertrand Russell.
Explicate?
If Sartre tried voicing his considerations today he'd be called an "Edgelord" and told to STFU - and I actually feel that's a fair response
Sarte..... road to hell. " Those who are thus bewildered are attracted by demonic and atheistic views. In that deluded condition, their hopes for liberation, their fruitive activities, and their culture of knowledge are all defeated. " Bhagavad Gita chapt9 v.12
"Religion is the opium of the poor." The Gambler, the Nun, and the Radio, E. Hemingway
@@Pun116Thank you
It was true, I had always realized it-I hadn’t any “right” to exist at all. I had appeared by chance, I existed like a stone, a plant, a microbe. I could feel nothing to myself but an inconsequential buzzing. I was thinking…that here we are eating and drinking, to preserve our precious existence, and that there’s nothing, nothing, absolutely no reason for existing.
Jean-Paul Sartre, Nausea
How horrifying. And false. Jesus Christ created this world!
You know it's gonna be bullshit when you see Bernard-Henri Levy in the introduction.
fashion philo Henry Levy but he got fashion argoument against Dugin
sartre began to lose popularity when he questioned the colonialist objective of his own country and western/european powers. the basic questions surrounding our freedom is eternal. i think it is better to exist with the concept that we have freedom, even if it is illusory, than the concept that we dont.
I hate Sartre when started to say Camus was not philo skill
@@danilogiannibirolo1187 did you know the french killed up to 2 million algerians?
Pretty suspect series in its premise.
What would you suggest as an alternative?
If any one is interested in real philosophy they should learn from Plato, Aristole and the Scholastics( and from the Germans). This means that you should are expected to learn ancient Greek, Latin and German. The order in which you study is rational philosophy, moral philosophy and natural philosophy. I have learnt rational philosophy but indeed to skip to Natural Philosophy( part of Natural Philosophy called Metaphysics)
Nice opinion, but not everyone shares your affinity for this “real” philosophy. Just because you disagree with someone doesn’t mean they’re not a real philosopher.
@@gavinyoung-philosophy It was addressed not you(I understand you're already into studying philosophy) but those who want to get into philosophy. I think you understand qualifier "real" in a literal sense( i.e. that which makes something what it is..."doesn't mean they're not real philosper"). By "real philosophy" I meant real philosophy such that its opposite is not that which is not philosophy-as something that is of gold is opposed to something that is not of gold-but such that its opposite is that which is of philosophy but less so, as pure gold is opposed to its alloys.
By philosophy I didn't mean what is meant by philosophy now( I think this is what you took it for), but what is meant by philosophy nominally. Latter necessarily pertains to wisdom in some sense.
These different understanding of the the same names is due to existing outlooks towards reality that are formed from different points of view and through a different route too.
@@gavinyoung-philosophy "Nice opinion, not everyone shares your affinity for this "real" philosophy."
Not everyone shares in affinity for the three divisions of thought from which philosophy stems: rational, moral and natural. Rational or Logical consists of study of arguments. For e.g. "That which casts a curved shadow is round. Since the earth casts a curved shadow on the mood during an eclipse, it is round". But since arguments are made of statements and statements are made of terms, all these are studied under Logic. Moral Philosophy studies human action and consists of monistic ethics, political ethics and domestic ethics. Natural philosophy consists of physics, psychology, metrology, metaphysics and also mathematics, astronomy and music. That no everyone shares in something doesn't mean that some don't.
"Just because I disagree with someone doesn't mean that they're not a real philosopher"
I didn't say disagreed with anyone. I think everyone has something to say that's related to truth. It's not like it's difficult. As the proverb says, "no one misses the door".
Mr Rhee is incompetent to teach philosophy.
Also comparing Russell's union stands and Sartre's fascisct stands is kind of an insult to the people who read political philosophy 😊
no i disagree
Sartre was a great enemy of fascism, anti-Semitism, racism and the rigid hierarchy of capitalist society. The rejection of mass murder for political reasons greatly influenced his philosophy. Existentialism is a celebration of life, freedom and the problematization of unreflective consensuses that make injustice invisible and preserved, from the political and social level to the personal and psychological level. I think he would not be able to calmly accept the genocide of Palestinian children in Gaza. Under Netanyahu's bestial government, Israel is a violent and bloodthirsty representation of the deepest denial of everything that Sartre considered good, beautiful and fair. Existentialism would now side with the Jewish rabbis who are attacked and even arrested because they dare to raise their voices against the genocide of the Palestinians promoted by Zionism with the nauseating support of the French, German, American and English authorities.
Sartres was a collabo, pedo and what not, an obnoxious man.