Minx Of Madness World Record

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ค. 2024
  • This is the minx of madness, it has 5993 moving parts and weighs over 10KG. It was printed on desktop FDM 3d printers over the course of 2 months.
    You can find the Anycubic Kobra at
    Official store: bit.ly/37ZvN1j
    Amazon store: amzn.to/3sdwHhA
    A big thank you to Polymaker for providing all the filament used in this project.
    You can find their filament here: us.polymaker.com?aff=41
    Solving 250 Rubik's Cubes BLINDFOLDED (WORLD RECORD): • Solving 250 Rubik's Cu...
    If you are interested in buying this puzzle, or have any other business inquiries please email me at: corenpuzzle@gmail.com
    0:00 Intro
    1:25 Turning
    2:07 Number of permutations
    4:23 Tools and materials used
    5:37 Scrambling
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 5K

  • @JJAG3
    @JJAG3 ปีที่แล้ว +9299

    Honestly, every turn is probably the only time that permeutatiom will ever exist

    • @YoureASquidYoureAKid
      @YoureASquidYoureAKid ปีที่แล้ว +703

      Its the same for a 3x3x3 cube. Since it has 43,252,003,274,489,856,000 permutations

    • @choco_jack7016
      @choco_jack7016 ปีที่แล้ว +687

      well except for when it's close to being solved as the almost solved permutations would appear more often.

    • @Louis_2568
      @Louis_2568 ปีที่แล้ว +296

      @@YoureASquidYoureAKid but even so with how many and how many times people have cubes I’m sure some permutations have been repeated

    • @hdjabs1950
      @hdjabs1950 ปีที่แล้ว +141

      The same is true every time you properly shuffle cards

    • @zisischartampilas6601
      @zisischartampilas6601 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      The real question is is it easier to make it ot ssolve it?

  • @JD-oc5wk
    @JD-oc5wk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7886

    I feel like this is the one cube where taking it apart and reassembling it would be faster than solving it.

  • @AusUnHus
    @AusUnHus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +687

    Even 1 year later he’s still solving it. That is what I call commitment!

    • @towerofresonance4877
      @towerofresonance4877 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      We ain't gettin pinned. He moved on.

    • @jandedycker1748
      @jandedycker1748 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      At this point I bet he's just re-applying stickers.

  • @dogsareawesome9197
    @dogsareawesome9197 ปีที่แล้ว +252

    The mix of tiny square pieces, stretched out long pieces, and big middle pieces almost make the puzzle look glitched out when scrambled. Thats my favorite thing about it, honestly

    • @theseangle
      @theseangle 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It looks like Reddit

    • @user-xf2my3hq8x
      @user-xf2my3hq8x 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually the diffferent sized pieces eliminates a lot of possibliities compared to all of them being the same size that would have allowed puzzle to scrammbled into. - Richard.

    • @atiny_my901
      @atiny_my901 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@user-xf2my3hq8xok Richard

  • @Tingman
    @Tingman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3476

    The scrambled puzzle looks like the Tesseract from Interstellar! So beautiful and mindbending.

    • @x2y7
      @x2y7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      First to reply yay

    • @x2y7
      @x2y7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I’m trying to get Tingman’s attention

    • @01xc92
      @01xc92 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@x2y7 😁

    • @UnknownX268
      @UnknownX268 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what's the difference?

    • @x2y7
      @x2y7 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@teaperm3549 oooo

  • @MaverickJeyKidding
    @MaverickJeyKidding ปีที่แล้ว +3534

    we finally getting closer to "the longer you scramble it - the harder it is to solve"

    • @zonetothepowerof3
      @zonetothepowerof3 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      i think we've passed that milestone just from this.

    • @MetricJester
      @MetricJester ปีที่แล้ว +93

      Well considering that once you get past 25 moves on a regular rubik's cube you start solving it, in this case the halfway point is some near astronomical number.

    • @me_fault
      @me_fault ปีที่แล้ว +29

      ​@@MetricJester that assumes every random move made took you further away from solved

    • @samuels1123
      @samuels1123 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@me_fault you cannot make something beyond 'perfectly randomized' there is a limit to the amount of information stored on the cube while still being usable, the big one has a much higher capacity but still has this limit

    • @me_fault
      @me_fault ปีที่แล้ว +11

      let me put it another way
      if you make a random move in an attempt to make the cube a further number of moves away from solved, how do you know you haven't inadvertently reduced the number of moves away from solved

  • @paulmorphy6187
    @paulmorphy6187 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    When I was about 10 the Rubik's cube came out in the UK in around 1980....it was a sensation...everyone had one...I taught myself to solve it and really enjoyed spending hours with it.
    Fast forward to 2022 and I would probably still be trying to solve this one if it came out in 1980!!

  • @gartersnake3288
    @gartersnake3288 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +116

    Legend has it he's still trying to solve it to this day

  • @max2x000
    @max2x000 ปีที่แล้ว +3020

    I love the idea that a super computer would try to render this and immediately explode

    • @taoarg9000
      @taoarg9000 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      The reality is a computer. We live in the matrix

    • @kamikeserpentail3778
      @kamikeserpentail3778 ปีที่แล้ว +209

      It wouldn't though.
      If it tried to render every possible permutation though it would definitely freeze up before it got even a fraction of the way.

    • @hydroxide5507
      @hydroxide5507 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@kamikeserpentail3778 🤓

    • @thesoftone
      @thesoftone ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@hydroxide5507 "🤓"🤓

    • @hydroxide5507
      @hydroxide5507 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@thesoftone ""🤓"🤓 "🤓

  • @Howlflame
    @Howlflame ปีที่แล้ว +1655

    As someone who has never solved a regular Rubix Cube, this just makes me cry in fear XD

    • @shadowsfall42
      @shadowsfall42 ปีที่แล้ว +80

      I've been working on my fun little 2x2 for like 6 years now only ever been able to solve 3 colors. Don't feel bad though I can't tell you how many times I've been shamed by people for being " too stupid to solve the easiest Rubix cube on the planet"

    • @ratisbonawau
      @ratisbonawau ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@shadowsfall42 💀💀💀

    • @lmccord2995
      @lmccord2995 ปีที่แล้ว +86

      I get you there, I’ve been trying to solve this 1x1 Rubix cube for a decade, damn near impossible…

    • @where_the_hell_am_i
      @where_the_hell_am_i ปีที่แล้ว +45

      @@lmccord2995 i feel you too bud, but i just dont get why i cant solve the 0x0, like its so unsolvable and ive been trying to solve it everyday, and still to this day and i've been at it FOR YEARS

    • @madmouse1016
      @madmouse1016 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *same*

  • @tygamer1326
    @tygamer1326 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    It’s been a year since this was posted…
    I think he’s still solving this puzzle today!

    • @Jasseu
      @Jasseu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I came to say the same thing.

  • @allenkatz5652
    @allenkatz5652 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    At 2:36, here's what the mess in the denominator means.
    Firstly, it's important to define the difference between a permutation and a combination. With permutation the order (or placement) is important while with combinations it's not. So, for example, if a teacher from a class of 20 is picking two class representatives and chooses Albert and Brian, it's the same thing as choosing Brian and Albert so the different number of combinations is (20/2) * 19 = 190 (with the 2 in the denominator since the first representative chosen can be in two different spots). Now, if the teacher is choosing a president and vice president- choosing Albert for president and Brian for vice president is different than choosing Brian for president and Albert for vice president so the number of permutations is 20*19 = 380.
    To explain the denominator in the equation in the video, let's start with a Gigaminx. The face on a Gigaminx has a center pentagon, a middle ring and an outer ring (i.e., the edge). We're going to focus on the middle ring of one face and ignore the center pentagon and outer ring. The middle ring has five diamond shaped pieces and five trapezoid shaped pieces. Since placement of each diamond shaped piece doesn't make a difference, a solver can place the first diamond in five places, the second one in four places, the third one in three places, the fourth one in two places and the last one is forced into the remaining spot. So, there are 5*4*3*2*1 = 5! = 120 ways for the diamonds on the first face to be placed (all of which are correct in a solved Gigaminx). Similarly, there are 5! = 120 ways (again, all of which are correct) for the trapezoid pieces to be placed when solving the first face. So, with twelve faces there are twelve sets of diamonds and twelve sets of trapezoids for a total of 24 sets. With n = 2 for a Gigaminx we have 12*n*(n-1) = 12*2*(2-1) = 24 which is the 24 sets. And that's where the exponent of 24 comes from for the 5! in the denominator.
    Using other values of n: for n = 1 (a typical Megaminx) the exponent is 0 which makes the denominator 1 as expected since there's no user discretion where to place any piece (i.e., every single piece will be in the exact same spot when it's solved). For n = 2 (a Gigaminx) I showed above that the exponent is 24. For n = 3 (a Teraminx) the exponent is 72 as there are 6 different sets of pieces, on each of the 12 faces, that can be in five different locations each (0 in the innermost layer - the middle pentagon, 2 in the next layer, 4 in the next layer and 0 in the next layer - the edge). For n = 4 (a Petaminx) the exponent is 144 as there is one more ring than a Teraminx and each subsequent ring has 2 more pieces that can be in any of 5 places and (2+4+6) *12 = 144.
    Finally, for n = 10 (does it even have a name?) the exponent in the denominator is 1,080 (12*10*(10-1) = 1,080.
    Note that if each piece was numbered and had to go in a specific spot the exponent in the denominator would be 0.

    • @jjayala5512
      @jjayala5512 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      🥴

    • @nerksyo
      @nerksyo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      🥴

    • @littlegirlcry0211
      @littlegirlcry0211 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Damn

    • @josef2012
      @josef2012 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Beat it,nerd.

    • @ShoshanaLeahKatz
      @ShoshanaLeahKatz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      thanks dad that was really helpful. could you explain how the function of n in the exponent of the denominator is derived?

  • @zozo3071
    @zozo3071 ปีที่แล้ว +784

    Wow using the demon core to create an extreme puzzle is wild

    • @tbagwow
      @tbagwow ปีที่แล้ว +6

      yea

    • @subzerocatalyst
      @subzerocatalyst ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i knew i aint the 1st one to think that

    • @theliam3786
      @theliam3786 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well if it was a demon core it would be made of metal

    • @cripmusicongfrfr
      @cripmusicongfrfr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      gets screwdriver

    • @ThisIsOrangePumpkin
      @ThisIsOrangePumpkin 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      screwdriver about to make the whole thing explode

  • @williamsanborn9195
    @williamsanborn9195 ปีที่แล้ว +1360

    “How many possible ways are there to scramble this puzzle”
    Me: “TOO many.”
    “8.6x10^7924 possible ways.”
    Me: “Like I said. TOO MANY!”

    • @robbieaulia6462
      @robbieaulia6462 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      NOT ENOUGH

    • @magicalunicorn1296
      @magicalunicorn1296 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Theres more than 86 duomilli-sescentillion (the 2600th -illion), ways to scramble it

    • @zzztriplezzz5264
      @zzztriplezzz5264 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@magicalunicorn1296hello. I am aware of the fact that when naming powers of 1000 there are prefixes used in the words such as quadragin and nonagin and millia (I am quite fascinated with it, and I’ve been on the first 10000 powers of 10 website). However, I have yet to find a website that includes names for much larger numbers, like up to powers of a million. Do you have any? Or is there a rule you have to follow when naming them?

    • @magicalunicorn1296
      @magicalunicorn1296 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@zzztriplezzz5264
      th-cam.com/video/tP-pvo7N5ks/w-d-xo.html
      vidoe

    • @DumDouglas
      @DumDouglas ปีที่แล้ว

      Infinity.....

  • @Chris_691
    @Chris_691 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The amount of precision this need is unbelievable

  • @nicolasfranks3603
    @nicolasfranks3603 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So ready for that solved video! The dedication is wild!

  • @scrambledmc3772
    @scrambledmc3772 2 ปีที่แล้ว +652

    Just one thing: you never mentioned how many layer this has.
    Edit: just counted, this is a 21x21 minx. That’s impressive great job!

    • @ImScor327
      @ImScor327 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      This, if it was named after the prefixes of -byte words... Would be a god damn chonky hecka' bigass mindbreaking groundsmashing ENDECAMINX. Holy mother of Joseph...

    • @scratchthecatqwerty9420
      @scratchthecatqwerty9420 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@ImScor327 It's named with Metric prefixes, but if it was, then there will be not enough prefixes! In fact, you will need to invent 3 new prefixes to name it!

    • @ImScor327
      @ImScor327 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@scratchthecatqwerty9420 actually, just found out that you only need to invent one! Bronto- and geop- are units as well! Wtf
      P.D.: They are not SI units, but they're the most acceptable ones along with "hellabyte" as a substitute for "brontobyte"

    • @pawfectdogs4629
      @pawfectdogs4629 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ImScor327 undecaminx*

    • @ImScor327
      @ImScor327 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@pawfectdogs4629 guess spanish and english prefixes are different depending on which... It's endeca for me but anyways, still meaning 11 here

  • @Wunba
    @Wunba 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1224

    Insane video, well produced, it was entertaining all the way through and I cannot believe you’re actually solving it! My guess is 70 hours 😬

    • @baddgeeksquad
      @baddgeeksquad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      E

    • @baddgeeksquad
      @baddgeeksquad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ye

    • @cadenalexander6014
      @cadenalexander6014 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      didn't expect to see you here do you like cubing too?

    • @marcsusus
      @marcsusus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      wunba = cuber?

    • @shahbazmalik412
      @shahbazmalik412 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Wumba Likes cubing btw i am subed to both of these channels

  • @Bob_The_G0D
    @Bob_The_G0D 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This guy is honestly underrated

  • @yaboikennymccormick
    @yaboikennymccormick 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Guy:What do you you do for a living?
    corenpuzzle: I make Rubik’s cubes.
    Guy: Oh, that’s cool
    core puzzle: HUGE ONES.

  • @calebblack1420
    @calebblack1420 ปีที่แล้ว +215

    He was so busy wondering wether or not he could he never stopped to ask himself if he should. He’s warping the fabric of reality around him.

  • @RPGfanatic1996
    @RPGfanatic1996 ปีที่แล้ว +221

    As someone with no talent for these sorts of puzzles, I'm going to go out on a limb and say 3 years... due in part, to the sheer amount of possibilities and irl getting in the way of solving time.

    • @SuperChargeTheDumDum
      @SuperChargeTheDumDum ปีที่แล้ว +6

      As someone who has only solved a 3X3 2 times I’d say at least 2 years

    • @Felipera_
      @Felipera_ ปีที่แล้ว +17

      It's not even about knowing how to solve it. It's about the sheer size of this thing lmao. I take 2 weeks to solve my 8x8x8, this will take like 6 months for someone of his skill.

    • @ericvosselmans5657
      @ericvosselmans5657 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would say januari 2023

    • @shadowsfall42
      @shadowsfall42 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Try not being able to solve a 2x2 for 6 years... this is the pain I carry everyday.

    • @otamota7563
      @otamota7563 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Honestly, if he spends about 8 hours a day on the puzzle, he could probably finish it in less than a week.

  • @onebrickatatime9097
    @onebrickatatime9097 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Legends say he's still solving it to this day.

  • @midnightcat6116
    @midnightcat6116 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This looks like a beautiful piece of art 🖼️

  • @PowerOfNull
    @PowerOfNull ปีที่แล้ว +782

    After doing some research, This would technically be called the Vundaminx.
    Mega - 3
    Giga - 5
    Tera - 7
    Peta - 9
    Exa - 11
    Zetta - 13
    Yotta - 15
    Xona - 17
    Weka - 19
    Vunda - 21
    Now if only we could see a Lumaminx...

    • @SuB-mt6nv
      @SuB-mt6nv ปีที่แล้ว +8

      where did you get these names from?

    • @ericwu6571
      @ericwu6571 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      @@SuB-mt6nv prefixes for data units its one of the first few results on google

    • @SuB-mt6nv
      @SuB-mt6nv ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ericwu6571 thanks

    • @The_upgrater
      @The_upgrater ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @American Mapper
      luma - 23
      lotta -25

    • @The_upgrater
      @The_upgrater ปีที่แล้ว +3

      But what about the varieties of kilominx?

  • @seanbarraclough2484
    @seanbarraclough2484 ปีที่แล้ว +159

    I'd leave it scrambled, and just admire it. Phenomenal creation.

  • @hiedegabarda1204
    @hiedegabarda1204 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "Your heart beats faster, as you turn the minx of madness."

  • @JayTEP
    @JayTEP 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    “ a 1 in 8.6x10^7924 that tonight a meteor will come hurting through the atmosphere and come smashing your bed”. Just what I needed to fall asleep

  • @GrahamSiggins
    @GrahamSiggins 2 ปีที่แล้ว +250

    Congrats on finishing this! Must feel amazing. Can’t believe you’re actually trying to solve it lol. I’ll wager a guess of 55 hours over the course of a few weeks

    • @GrahamSiggins
      @GrahamSiggins 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Also thanks for the shoutout :)

    • @W4LRUS7769
      @W4LRUS7769 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      if this becomes mass produced, do multiblind with it

    • @adamgrundy4327
      @adamgrundy4327 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      i think it will be 70+ hours

    • @otamota7563
      @otamota7563 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it could be 48 hours

  • @futbol9847
    @futbol9847 2 ปีที่แล้ว +212

    The fact he did this all from a 3D printer is insane. Plus it has stickers. Way to go man!

    • @djalexander968
      @djalexander968 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      i used to get irritated when my 3x3 would lose a sticker... just imagine the anger that would incite on a rubik's that has more possible permutations that suns in the observable universe

    • @jayluck8047
      @jayluck8047 ปีที่แล้ว

      The stickers could easily be done on a Cricut.

    • @Pimp.My.Forklift
      @Pimp.My.Forklift 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A couple days ago I saw a 3d printed nerf gattling gun that could shoot 500 darts in 9 seconds, at this point I wouldn't be surprised if I read on the news that someone robbed a bank by tunneling under the vault with a 3d printed driveable mega drill.

    • @drsnova7313
      @drsnova7313 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I wonder why he didn't just print everything in different colors. Sounds far easier than applying all those stickers, and, more importantly, there's no chance of one falling off.

    • @jandedycker1748
      @jandedycker1748 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@djalexander968 not just stars in the observable universe... PARTICLES in the observable universe.

  • @monkchips
    @monkchips 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really fun project. Easily as much fun as testing how long it takes for each stubbed toe to stop throbbing, dependant upon the order they are stubbed in.

  • @rpg247a
    @rpg247a 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If I'm going to die in my sleep by getting smashed to death by 616 meteorites, then I officially blame this video for my death.

  • @Kewbix
    @Kewbix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +231

    Those were some really interesting analogies lol

    • @shaunthedcoaddict1656
      @shaunthedcoaddict1656 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hi kewbix im a great fan

    • @datshie5706
      @datshie5706 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm fan

    • @Dried.
      @Dried. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      kewbix how long do you think it will take to solve my guess is 80+ hours

    • @beronicagr
      @beronicagr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Big fan kewbix

    • @Cuber101
      @Cuber101 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Big fan

  • @epicroblox2955
    @epicroblox2955 2 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    The 21x21 rubiks cube takes 5-6 hours to solve, but the 21x21 version of a megaminx will take around 3 days is my guess. Especially since it's a lot more difficult to turn, and megaminxes take a lot longer to solve.

  • @mannyyoutube3259
    @mannyyoutube3259 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks really cool as a decoration piece for a lamp or a base when it's not solved, I could never solve it anyway.😱

  • @siriosstar4789
    @siriosstar4789 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Psychiatrist - so, how can i help you ?"
    patient - " minx of madness, minx of madness"
    doctor - i'm sorry what ?"
    patient - MINX OF MADNESS!"

  • @laiscube
    @laiscube 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    I thought the Atlasminx was recent. Impressed that you surpassed it relatively quickly compared to how often such "size records" are broken. Pleasantly surprised to see the Moyu-styled multi-tiered mechanism. A proven way to get both stability and smoothness, as shown by the big Meilongs and the Moyu 21x21.

  • @lethalbloom2147
    @lethalbloom2147 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Honestly I feel like it'll take at least a year to truly solve this monster

  • @Serenity_Dee
    @Serenity_Dee 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The denominator is to eliminate permutations that are only distinguished by overall orientation - that is, permutations that are identical save that the whole thing is rotated on an axis.
    As soon as I saw that equation, I knew that number would be on that order. Factorials scale up very, _very_ quickly.

  • @victordeluca7360
    @victordeluca7360 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude's conjuring a Rasengan by the end lol

  • @enmysune
    @enmysune 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    every time i think coren's reached the limit, he just pulls out another one of these.
    this is absolutely incredible, your dedication is amazing. congrats on this huge accomplishment!

  • @SteppingRazor762
    @SteppingRazor762 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Just having the puzzle sitting on your desk scrambled makes it a pretty awesome piece of art 👍

  • @Firestar4041
    @Firestar4041 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Evil scientist: "Behold! The Minx of Madness! *thunder cracks *evil laughter
    Schmoe: "Neat, hammer time." *smash
    Scientist: "Wait, hold on-"

  • @KCWPCCW
    @KCWPCCW 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mixes it up... stares at it... okay I'm not solving it, I'll just build a new one.

  • @mrs_plinkett
    @mrs_plinkett ปีที่แล้ว +4

    i have never seen any content abt Rubik's cube before and still got very entertained and engaged by this video, so props for your wonderful work! both in regards to puzzle designing and videomaking. I'll definitely stick around now lol

  • @GODDAMNLETMEJOIN
    @GODDAMNLETMEJOIN 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I'm not sure if your wrists will last long enough to solve it. Tens of thousands of turns and reorientations on a 10kg puzzle is hard work!

  • @420alfonzo6
    @420alfonzo6 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You know the math is serious when the numbers got exclamation marks.

  • @shelleyreynolds5810
    @shelleyreynolds5810 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WOW, seriously!!!!! Amazing!!!!!

  • @aaronrattanachaipipat
    @aaronrattanachaipipat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I’m just so mindblowned you managed to pull this off. This Is such an amazing design!!! I’m just speechless the amount of effort you put into making this a reality!

  • @bread4664
    @bread4664 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    This is completely insane. I am so happy I stumbled upon this. This really pushes the limits of consumer 3d printing. I am still impressed by printed 2x2 and 3x3s, much less this behemoth! Incredible work.
    My guess for the time is: 76 hrs

  • @drinny26
    @drinny26 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can’t with these things. Just attempting to start a regular Rubix cube stresses me out. This is just going to give me nightmares. 😂

  • @solarprogeny6736
    @solarprogeny6736 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think it looks really good scrambled as a decoration and art piece

  • @GalaxyBard
    @GalaxyBard ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I wouldn't have guessed you could actually solve it 😯 That will be cool to see. That's a real piece of art you made there man! Thanks for sharing the video 🥰

  • @carljameson3082
    @carljameson3082 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This man stared directly into the abyss and his body started moving on its own until this accursed artifact was complete. That's the only reason I can think of why someone would create this

  • @Shroomkoobing69
    @Shroomkoobing69 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Legend says he’s still solving it

  • @Ocraftj
    @Ocraftj 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how long did the stickering take?

  • @GregMakesThings
    @GregMakesThings 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Well now I'm getting worried that your next record will beat the part count of the 33x33x33 haha ! That being said you beat the sticker count ! Well done man, always a pleasure to see you push the FDM envelope further and further !

  • @infrabread
    @infrabread 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    In order to become insane, you must have been sane in the first place. Coren; you're a wonderful human being and I have loved every puzzle you have made.

  • @ethereal3679
    @ethereal3679 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The early stages of making this thing look like the most sinister way to contain something that could blow up a universe.

  • @andretromp4606
    @andretromp4606 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Listen: publish this towards well known minds like yourself and challenge people to solve it. You could be the guy who makes this a worldwide phenomenon. People from all over the world come to try to solve the unsolvable puzzle hehe

  • @CubesMadeEasy
    @CubesMadeEasy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Incredible work! Watching the assembly was super satisfying. It's crazy to me how well it seems to turn as well. My guess is 80 hours of pure solving time, although obviously you will be taking many breaks in between.

  • @kimirikscreations
    @kimirikscreations ปีที่แล้ว +30

    That's a really impressive 3d print build. And omg does it give me anxiety just looking at it scrambled.

  • @HypnoticGoon
    @HypnoticGoon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rumor has it he's still solving it a year later.

  • @bmeht
    @bmeht 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do you know when it's sufficiently scrambled? With something this big isn't the # of steps to solve highly dependent on its degree of "scrambledness"?

  • @zylanderr
    @zylanderr ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Still easier to turn than a rubik's branded cube

  • @HorologicRannygazoo
    @HorologicRannygazoo ปีที่แล้ว +8

    ummm, 200 hours. Fantastic job! The larger minxes aren't harder to solve from a solution perspective. But the weight of that puzzle, the sheer volume of turns it is going to take and the constant possibility of popping pieces out while still unsolved (I cringe at that possibility -- man). Just building it is staggeringly impressive. That is a serious synthesis of tech and art.

  • @ok-ky1ns
    @ok-ky1ns 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Look at this absolute unit of a puzzle

  • @BryndanMeyerholtTheRealDeal
    @BryndanMeyerholtTheRealDeal 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Quettakilominx is pretty large, but I think the amount of pieces factors for that since we can't have the pieces get too small…

  • @matthewwhitt5249
    @matthewwhitt5249 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    1 year for an experienced solver... and that's it. No one else, is unscrambling that.

    • @nathannorton5972
      @nathannorton5972 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah it's been 9 months, still not solved

  • @cookiesyruplover
    @cookiesyruplover ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I didn't expect the video to have the part where it's being assembled! With how insane it looked, I thought the entire video was just about solving it. I'm blown away with this puzzle. My guess is 250 hours in the course of months because self-care is important lol Glad to see people with their passions. I'm definitely watching the solving video.

  • @PeterTheLegend23
    @PeterTheLegend23 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are the random numbers in the background the actual layed out sum of the equations of the number of combonations?

  • @mrgreatauk
    @mrgreatauk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude hasn't posted in a year because he's still trying to solve this beast

  • @arlomoore
    @arlomoore 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Your engineering skills are incredible! How did you get inspired to build things like this? I’m going to guess 73 hours and 24 minutes.

  • @JJCuber27
    @JJCuber27 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Are you actually kidding me, I thought that the Atlasminx would be the limit but you’ve managed to prove me wrong.
    Congrats on making this puzzle but I can’t believe you actually scrambled it lol

  • @IndyCoreStudios
    @IndyCoreStudios 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The amount of scramble combos there are is insane. I caculated it. It 86 with 7925 zeros after it.

  • @VitorMiguell
    @VitorMiguell 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "how long will I take to solve?"
    13 years.

  • @ElricWilliam
    @ElricWilliam ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Not much into solving them but they are hella fun to build, a few of my cubing friends have me build their stuff and honestly I love it xD

  • @pokemoncappo3898
    @pokemoncappo3898 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I SHUDDERED TO DEATH WHEN I SAW IT!!! also, the exoskeleton of it looks nice.

  • @julieduncan4075
    @julieduncan4075 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I could solve this relatively quickly: Remove, and then reapply all the stickers! Hahaha! Seriously though, it really amazes me what humans can come up with when they set their minds to it! Just incredible! ❤

  • @RICOFRITO
    @RICOFRITO 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm no math expert but when you put exclamation points in that mathematical equations my brain goes hmmm must be scary big number... yes... number be big!

  • @codproyo7798
    @codproyo7798 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Me trying to solve it when I was 10: this is gonna be easy!
    999 year old me: done!

  • @harrymacdonald2672
    @harrymacdonald2672 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    My guess is 87 hours. Can't wait to see it solved again!

  • @ericscheit5540
    @ericscheit5540 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The person that made this is actually insane.

  • @Famoke
    @Famoke 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Incredible!
    Humans are making rubik's cubes larger until theyre unplayable

    • @duffman18
      @duffman18 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bigger cubes/other twisty puzzles aren't harder, they just take longer. Once you know the method for the lower order ones, like say a 5x5 minx aka a gigaminx, then you use the same method for this as you would foe the gigaminx. There's just more of it. It's why buying the speedcubes over a certain size gets a bit pointless. Like, a 9x9 cube is not at all harder than a 7x7 cube. It just takes longer. So it can turn into a chore with some of these ridiculously oversized puzzles, you might solve them once ever, and then that's about it.

  • @lethaldrew5804
    @lethaldrew5804 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Genuine question, would it have been easier to make this puzzle stickerless rather than sticker it by hand? I mean, i know it would make piece design atleast a little harder for the edge/corner pieces, but if you didn't have to sticker all the tiny center piece it probably would've been easier right? Especially since you can just put a different color filament in the printer and you're good to go. Idk just my random thought.

    • @cheers9430
      @cheers9430 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      just like paint a whole side it's big enough

    • @pickyyeeter
      @pickyyeeter 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Considering that several pieces contain more than one color of sticker, they way he did it seems easier to me

  • @daftlife-ns5hc
    @daftlife-ns5hc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i had a teraminx once. i had already solved it a few times. then one time, one turn, KABOOM. pieces went everywhere. i still have it in a bag somewhere lol

  • @96_stars22
    @96_stars22 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is nothing short of incredible

  • @quikbale
    @quikbale 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    My guess is he filmed the maths after he solved the cube to feel better about the solve time 😂

  • @pbmander3949
    @pbmander3949 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jesus Christ bro I thought 52! was insane. I've seen so many videos about the mind boggling size of that number but the number of permutations on this thing is beyond comprehension. Woah.

  • @SpiteAro
    @SpiteAro 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I’m honestly surprised each turn doesn’t break the universe

    • @lennoxtvthingy7408
      @lennoxtvthingy7408 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Uhhh… What? I don’t get where you’re going with this.

  • @cubingsummarized950
    @cubingsummarized950 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Incredible! I would say 4-5 days to solve the puzzle.

  • @nubbyderg
    @nubbyderg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Teratominx sounds like a fitting name for this, because it's a MONSTER.

  • @MagmaVA6
    @MagmaVA6 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i cant wait to have my sleep interrupted by 616 meteorites.

  • @boijyprogrammertv
    @boijyprogrammertv 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not gonna lie, this cube will make any pro cuber cry😂

  • @rustyshackleford9588
    @rustyshackleford9588 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Putting it together is almost as impressive as solving it.

  • @p_1749
    @p_1749 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    6:30 the cube in the top left corner of the table disapeared.

  • @irenel9726
    @irenel9726 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Solving this and creating this is hell

  • @JoeArty
    @JoeArty 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the next thing I need to 3d print right after the planetary gearbox 😅

  • @ka1ebsauce
    @ka1ebsauce ปีที่แล้ว +3

    dear god... i wouldnt wish the solving of this puzzle upon my greatest enemies, let alone the set up.

  • @mridontkn
    @mridontkn ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hard one: ill go with a safe guess of 74 hours, 35 minutes, 58 seconds and 176 milliseconds. Great video!