Complete GMAT Course EP9: GMAT QUANT Remainders & Divisibility

[@ashishsinha9035]

Thanks GMAT Club, GMAT Ninja and Charles for this awesome, fantastic session! At the end, Charles he described Harry as follows-is smarter, sleeps more, has s**ier accent, taller, has better hair and is awesome. But let me tell a plain and unvarnished truth-Harry, or any GMAT tutor for that matter, does not have the sense of humour that Charles has!

[@gmatclub]

agree!

[@linus284]

But he’s wrong on question #4, right?
If the range of seven different integers is six, than they have to be consecutive. At 33:31 he started to put in numbers in his example that would increase the range to over six.
That means that both statements mean the same and are both sufficient on their own (D)

[@samcollis2525]

The range of the seven REMAINDERS is 6... not the seven numbers themselves. So if you had:
7 (r=0)
13 (r=6)
20 (r=6)
27 (r=6)
34 (r=6)
41 (r=6)
48 (r=6)
The sum would be 36, and the range of the remainders would be 6.
However if you had:
7 (r=0)
8 (r=1)
9 (r=2)
10 (r=3)
11 (r=4)
12 (r=5)
13 (r=6)
The sum would be 21, and the range of the remainders would still be 6.
I think you confused the numbers themselves having the range vs. the range of the remainders

[@linus284]

@@samcollis2525 oh damn yeah, you’re right. Got it.

[@footlongchen]

watched thanks

[@gmatclub]

Thanks for the visit. Don't forget to LIKE and SUBSCRIBE.

[@sameerraa-g8t]

Hey Kean👋