Lara Brown, the Speakers Officer, looks like she's bored in the beginning when she's not talking. At the end of the interview she seems to be enjoying it more, and Bear was a gentleman to give her praise at the end of the interview!
There seem to be a trick in what is known as (game theory, if not in game theory, some other game theory), nonetheless, to what I am referring and want to highlight is this....! If a start up point for anyone is by default a type of honesty based on the five senses (at minimum), and (then) for all possible combinations of reason and, logic in all possible fields of life is substituted with the opposite of honesty (let's call it dishonesty)....! Then....: The opposite of honesty would take the start point with and within anyone, and having been adopted through all possible combinations of reason and logic, this new initial start up point would be more or less exactly as the original start up point of honesty by default of being with five senses (at minimum). The question is....! In such a scenario where the opposite of honesty acts and behaves exactly as honesty, until.....! What type of scenario or combinations of would trigger (the until part) the being of the false honesty becoming that which is true, (the opposite of honesty)!?!? It should not be asked, but as I see it to be important to what I am referring to, I will. Why? Why would the true appearance of the opposite of honesty be triggered!?!?! I have to emphasise that when in possession of such an answer, in relation to the (why), a substantial series of events, most probably, serious in nature, would have already happened for the (why) answer to be with and within anyone. I say this in order to point something (more specifically a understanding) that can derive from such a form of being, which has to do with a true statement in relation to all types of survival, one that can be confirmed by all that have been part of, and are in knowledge of, including people who train for, and it is that....! Survival in its true existence is boring and it involves a series of traumatic points that when and if completed round up in one total boring and traumatic event. I say boring, because trauma is that, unless trauma is though of as an exciting experience, then I have been missing big chunk of history, or everyone taking part in history is not telling the truth. Meaning they are starting from the opposite of honesty initial state. A final question is this...! If what I point out has any weight of truth with and within....! Then what is failure, and what does it mean not giving up for anyone!?!?! One very specific and although peculiar it is highly complex, form of being that derives from such an existence is possibly this...! Once such a state is understood as being with and within anyone, that makes a perfect setting for only one type of interaction, if that anyone refuses to adopt the same move as anyone involved in using the opposite of honesty in the exact same way as honesty. And the interaction has to do with the fact that there would be no place for anyone to be kindly honest, instead there would be only the perfect place for anyone to be horribly honest, putting even more confusion in establishing where honesty and the opposite of honesty resides if witnessing or observing, without leaving aside the taking part bit.. (Maybe that is the exciting part of survival I have been missing in understanding). Because if applying such a method in being, then anyone making use of the opposite of honesty as honesty, win's in two very determined ways. If a horrible even if in honesty reaction is directed at them, that makes a win for most of the tries. If anyone in full honesty of being, switches to the opposite of honesty because of the interaction, that makes a win also. What it achieves as it's main purpose is a division of groups where the interactions in being can be predicted at minimum as a structure. I believe in such a scenario there is anything else, but survival. Meaning...! If anyone of you that are going to be in positions where your failure will effect a lot of people, even if on the terms of money, don't try again, give up, unless you are not going to fail. Then anyone will be able to see if a failure is really that, or a success is really that.
Lara Brown, the Speakers Officer...after all his accomplishments of "The Bear Grylls"...you sit him on a off balance cheap bar stool. Both you and the prestigious school should be embarrassed. even he called it out as you sat your big butt down in a comfortable chair. you acted as if you not interested in what he had to say. get someone that appreciates a hero and a positive influencer to both young and old. you gotta love Bear! such a humble man, great father to his sons and husband to a wonderful supporting wife of many years. thank you Bear for setting an example for this 72 year ol man....
This was very disrespectful to Bear.He is such a nice humble man... He has done more in his career than that girl there... How she has that type of gut is beyond me I'm sorry but seeing someone disrespected who was a big part in my childhood...I mean.come on...
Thank you for this video! Bear is soooo encouraging, humble, kind, and shines positivity!
Our pleasure!
Bear Grylls, such a nice and warming guy, no arrogance to him whatsoever. Will have national treasure status before long.
🤭🤢🤮
That went into some surprising areas. It was a bit like one of his adventures down this and that avenue. Very inspiring.
An awesome,really inspiring interview! Bear is so humble ,authentic and true. Great advices!
Show us more Man vs. Wild 🏕
I am looking forward to hearing Bear Grylls! He is such an inspirational hero and great heart! ❤
Lara Brown, the Speakers Officer, looks like she's bored in the beginning when she's not talking. At the end of the interview she seems to be enjoying it more, and Bear was a gentleman to give her praise at the end of the interview!
Awesome guy
You can't hate this dude, you gotta love him ,he is a hero
There seem to be a trick in what is known as (game theory, if not in game theory, some other game theory), nonetheless, to what I am referring and want to highlight is this....!
If a start up point for anyone is by default a type of honesty based on the five senses (at minimum), and (then) for all possible combinations of reason and, logic in all possible fields of life is substituted with the opposite of honesty (let's call it dishonesty)....!
Then....: The opposite of honesty would take the start point with and within anyone, and having been adopted through all possible combinations of reason and logic, this new initial start up point would be more or less exactly as the original start up point of honesty by default of being with five senses (at minimum).
The question is....! In such a scenario where the opposite of honesty acts and behaves exactly as honesty, until.....! What type of scenario or combinations of would trigger (the until part) the being of the false honesty becoming that which is true, (the opposite of honesty)!?!? It should not be asked, but as I see it to be important to what I am referring to, I will. Why? Why would the true appearance of the opposite of honesty be triggered!?!?! I have to emphasise that when in possession of such an answer, in relation to the (why), a substantial series of events, most probably, serious in nature, would have already happened for the (why) answer to be with and within anyone.
I say this in order to point something (more specifically a understanding) that can derive from such a form of being, which has to do with a true statement in relation to all types of survival, one that can be confirmed by all that have been part of, and are in knowledge of, including people who train for, and it is that....! Survival in its true existence is boring and it involves a series of traumatic points that when and if completed round up in one total boring and traumatic event. I say boring, because trauma is that, unless trauma is though of as an exciting experience, then I have been missing big chunk of history, or everyone taking part in history is not telling the truth. Meaning they are starting from the opposite of honesty initial state.
A final question is this...!
If what I point out has any weight of truth with and within....!
Then what is failure, and what does it mean not giving up for anyone!?!?!
One very specific and although peculiar it is highly complex, form of being that derives from such an existence is possibly this...! Once such a state is understood as being with and within anyone, that makes a perfect setting for only one type of interaction, if that anyone refuses to adopt the same move as anyone involved in using the opposite of honesty in the exact same way as honesty.
And the interaction has to do with the fact that there would be no place for anyone to be kindly honest, instead there would be only the perfect place for anyone to be horribly honest, putting even more confusion in establishing where honesty and the opposite of honesty resides if witnessing or observing, without leaving aside the taking part bit..
(Maybe that is the exciting part of survival I have been missing in understanding).
Because if applying such a method in being, then anyone making use of the opposite of honesty as honesty, win's in two very determined ways. If a horrible even if in honesty reaction is directed at them, that makes a win for most of the tries. If anyone in full honesty of being, switches to the opposite of honesty because of the interaction, that makes a win also. What it achieves as it's main purpose is a division of groups where the interactions in being can be predicted at minimum as a structure.
I believe in such a scenario there is anything else, but survival.
Meaning...! If anyone of you that are going to be in positions where your failure will effect a lot of people, even if on the terms of money, don't try again, give up, unless you are not going to fail. Then anyone will be able to see if a failure is really that, or a success is really that.
Sagarmatha*
but full credits to Grylls. Respect.
Hilarious how he is throwing these bugs around in this prestigious hall 😂😂
Embrace my fear of playing my Melodeon in public. Mmm well I can give it a go!!
Yes interviewer was not giving the concentration or respect to him. She looked a child next to him
Interviewer is a good sport at the end! Surely he was not meant to have the stool though while the interviewer gets the wing back chair? 🤔
Lara Brown, the Speakers Officer...after all his accomplishments of "The Bear Grylls"...you sit him on a off balance cheap bar stool. Both you and the prestigious school should be embarrassed. even he called it out as you sat your big butt down in a comfortable chair. you acted as if you not interested in what he had to say. get someone that appreciates a hero and a positive influencer to both young and old. you gotta love Bear! such a humble man, great father to his sons and husband to a wonderful supporting wife of many years. thank you Bear for setting an example for this 72 year ol man....
Sbe wants to kill bear Grylls
This was very disrespectful to Bear.He is such a nice humble man...
He has done more in his career than that girl there...
How she has that type of gut is beyond me
I'm sorry but seeing someone disrespected who was a big part in my childhood...I mean.come on...