Why Diamond DA50 is Extremely Well Designed
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ค. 2024
- Established Titles are now running an early Black Friday Sale. Go to establishedtitles.com/DWAYNE and get an additional 10% off on any purchase with code DWAYNE. Thanks to Established Titles for sponsoring this video!
#DiamondDA50RG #DiamondAircraft
The Diamond DA50 RG has been a product with which Diamond Aircraft has sought to impress consumers and the general public from the first moment, both for its design and exterior and interior features, as well as its overall performance. Also, this company has accustomed us to the durability of their products, so it is a guarantee that the DA50 RG will be flying the skies for a good number of years.
Chapters:
00:00 - Introduction
00:29 - Exterior Design
01:24 - Interior
02:19 - Engine
04:12 - Performance
05:24 - Avionics
06:28 - Systems
07:02 - Variants
07:36 - Market
08:06 - Established Titles
09:22 - Pros
10:02 - Cons
10:36 - Conclusion
_________________________________________________
To contact me directly: Dashboardglobal@techie.com
_________________________________________________
Our channel is about Aviation.
We make the best educational aviation videos you've ever seen; my videos are designed to clear misunderstandings about airplanes and explain complicated aviation topics in a simple way.
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | ครอบครัวสะท้านทุ่ง "นางบี & อ้ายสติ๊ก"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/A1rhYcxxNtA/mqdefault.jpg)
Bought one. Waiting on the FAA and just can't wait till it gets here.
congratulations!! where are you gonna be flying it out of?
how long till it gets here, how much was it, and what was the process like buying one??
It will be interesting to see how Continental’s modified Mercedes 0M642 Diesel engine works out.
Love the wide cabin. Simply marvellous! But the 3 seat rear bench looks cramped. More suitable for 2 adults and 1 skinny/small kid. Also, on the minus point, the 44 foot span will not fit inside a typical 40 foot hangar. Overall I like it's sleek super sexy looks. A C172 or 182 would look like a dowdy old granny compared to this.
I’m sorry. I really wanted to like this plane, but like many others have mentioned here, after you take all of the sensationalism, this plane does not do anything outstanding for its price point: not pressurized, not a 6 seater, not a twin, no parachute, and it’s max speed is 185kts. Really?
It seems Diamond wants us to pay an extra $800k for an easy start and burn $80.00 less on fuel per hour. Do the math.
Why would anyone by this airplane instead of an SR-22T, a Panthers, a Lancair or even the DA-62 is beyond me.
Exactly what I was thinking. An SR22T DA62 or DA42 are all better GA options in this price bracket.
The only thing Diamond pushes is the low cost of fuel, when owners bring it into the shop for maintenance, they are surprised it’s not a $2K annual including squawks…..closer to $5K-$7K depending on findings
can you elaborate? are they poorly built or use cheap parts?
as i watch i might add, is it due to the amount of technological components in the cockpit? i’m a lowly cfi in a 172 lol but genuinely curious why mechanics give diamond aircraft heat
@@jesster777 Both, but more just simply cheap in terms of quality, you still pay high costs for the parts many times.
Literally was just talking with my boss today about this, one of our customer has a brand new DA62, already getting a whole new engine. At least it’s warrantied for him.
@@jesster777 no, as with all new aircraft all the systems are “generally” the same with their own flavor. Think the Perspective avionics in Cirrus….basically G1000/NXI.
To me, every system in Diamonds from a mechanics point of view (even the interior stuff like seats) was an afterthought. Many tasks are a pain to complete.
I would’ve better liked it if they stayed with the original Da 50 design, the cost would’ve been a lot less and it would have had an engine that doesn’t go to the trash can after reaching it’s hour limit. Ok it would’ve been an AVGAS burning engine but still one with FADEC. Now you have a plane that costs so much it doesn’t make any sense to buy it no matter how much fuel it burns. I wonder if they’re actually selling well?
Yes that three seats in the back looks very cramped, I thought it had the same seating arrangement as the da62. I guess I was wrong
So the DA50 is a four seater, with two people in the back you only have a few inches between them, 10 inches at the most, maybe three kids will fit in back
Largest single in the world for GA aircraft is the USA. They produce an airplane which won’t fit in a standard T-hanger!!
Pros: cabin space, rear door. Jet-A, solid built quality Cons: slow for a retractable, no parachute nor Garmin safe home feature. Only 50 gallons of fuel so range 3 hours plus reserve. Continental Fadec engine still unproven. Unless one needs the space or reliant on Jet-A, a cirrus is superior. This comes from somebody whi flies a DA-62. If you can, buy a DA-62
The jet fuel burning turbo diesel engines are ultra fuel efficient and powerful. 😎
got me hooked
Shameless advertising for a pretty plane that is too expensive and not very capable compared to the competition.
Your videos just sound like a high schooler wrote marketing copy for diamond.
Two big problems:
Total Cost oder TCO
Anti Sanctions guarantees.
I think Pipistrel Panthera will be more successful on the market.
As experimental to swap out the carbureted rattler with a FADEC unit? Definitely.
It has a fuel injected engine, not a carburetor. But perhaps they could swap it from an IO-540 to a TEO-540. Although that fadec would raise the cost significantly.
@@kristus20 Indeed it does. Swap it with like a UL Power or something.
@@abel4776 you know a UL power probably wouldn’t suffice, for one it’s not certified. And regardless their biggest engine is 200hp, while the fuel injected IO-540 the panthera uses now has 260hp. I know the panthera is only experimental as of now, but the plan is to have it certified soon, and therefore you need a certified engine. I actually like this IO-540 it’s a solid reliable engine and will easily make it to tbo and beyond. But I realize fuel economy could be better and some are fond of the simplicity fadec brings to the pilot, I believe their best bet would be to offer a fadec engine version as an option, so people would have a say in it. Best option in that area would be a fadec version of the 540 engine and it already exists, (used by a Tecnam P-2012), they only require lycoming to produce a modified version of it, suitable to the panthera. It would be doable and not crazy expensive to have it certified.
Well, I stopped listening to the Panthera story when full electric versions where promised. That's obviously impossible without a miracle in battery gravimetric energy density (assuming you want to fly more than 30 minutes at comparable speeds) or finally redirecting investments towards fuel cells and H2. Comparing an existing product to a ghost 👻 ? I would like the Panthera with a BRS, Jet A engine and 6 digit price better than the 50 as it is, but you can't always get what you want.
Pipper M350 is lest price, faster and more distan!
Biggest issue for me was safety.
I don't have to worry about weight and balance huh?
Always funny to use the argument of fuel saving on something that costs over a million dollar to purchase.
The price is too high for what you get. Add a bit more money and get a used 6 seater pressurized turbine.
Still, you can get a brand new pressurized 6 seater piper M350 for the same price. It has more power and flies faster. All right it burns twice the amount of fuel, but it’s worth it and to be honest, if you can afford the plane, you can easily afford the fuel.
@@kristus20 don´t only think about fuel, maintenance costs for a pressurised plane and a turboprop are way higher.
@@MickeLang M350 is not a turboprop, yes the pressurization costs more to maintain. But that wasn’t really the point. It’s just you can get so many planes with equal or even better performance for far less money. And a private individual is not ever going to earn that back by saving a little on fuel costs. Also that CD-300 engine that’s in a DA50 might be fuel efficient but costs a lot more to replace, and has to be replaced after TBO. It can not get an overhaul. So there’s another thing to factor in. And if that’s not bad enough, not many A&P’s are familiar with this design, it doesn’t have the support a piper, cessna, beech etc. Enjoys and the engine again just makes that worse.
Really best of the best !
Great airplane, horrible ad
Not the safest. Bullshit. Does it have a parachute like the Cirrus? WTF dude.
With crash landing cage fuselage? Exit out of spins easier than a Cirrus? Arguably.
Diamond DA42 is the safest GA airplane out there. It has the lowest rate of accidents and fatalities.
All diamond aircraft are made with that same philosophy in mind.
21,000 ceiling 🤣 1,000,000 + base. 👎 👎
Am not taking my family in a piston, despite what the marketing department says.
They’ve been around for a century now, it’s not “the marketing department” it’s statistics. A comment like that is just out of place and harmful for the aviation community. If you get in a car you’re taking a lot more risk compared to when you’re in ANY current aircraft.
@@kristus20 Mate, am a pilot myself. I said what I said because of my experience and the aviation community is way bigger than armchair simulator pilots.
@@snowblazed3442 Avaition community is bigger? On which world? Not our planet. The private pilot registry peaked in 1980, and has been declining every year since. Sometimes it plateaus, but rarely if ever goes upwards. When I do my annual cross country trip across 5 states and 6.5 hours in the left seat, I rarely if ever have to deal with another aircraft on my journey. And yes, it's in a piston airplane. Look up a Cessna 182. Has quite the safety record.
@@snowblazed3442 congrats, I’m a pilot too you know. And hey, I realized you might be somewhat right depending on what part of the world you live in, Africa doesn’t have a very sound safe record, but then, neither do African airlines flying jets. I fly with planes maintained up to standards set by EASA, and I can assure you, I trust those aircraft with my live. Don’t put blame on perfectly fine engines, how safe that plane is depends on the pilot flying it and it’s maintenance record. You can make anything unsafe.
@@kristus20 By your name, you sound like one of those salty white south Africans who got chased away by the real Africans. Btw... am an Aussie mate. My single point was that I wouldn't trust taking my family in a single piston, it was obviously my subjective opinion based on my flying experience so no need to be too riled up about it. It's just a youtube comment, not your life.
It’s just plain ugly.
Thumbs down. I wonder when someone will post an honest review of this plane’s poor capability to cost ratio.
Wayyyy too expensive… moving on…
All that technology and no BRS parachute. 🙄
Da50 glides less feet per min. than a sr22 does when the chute is deployed.