UI impresses the user, UX helps the user. The fun fact is that the help occurs without the knowledge of the user, that's the diff. Even with that being said, it's hard to me saying that UX is more important because if the design of a website literally sucks, the user won't stay on that page. For me is 50-50. Good video, keep like that.
Agreed. Its like saying what MAKES a cup coffee and arguing if its the water the beans or the cup. Without one, the others dont make the whole, UI UX is 1 coin but 2 sides and in a 3D world we cant have 2D 1 sided coins, theres always 2 sides that make the coin.
This video should be shown to people without UX experience. It feels like a lot of businesses prefer something that looks different and modern instead of giving a good user experience. One of my biggest frustrations in recent years is the UX of big gaming franchises like Call of Duty, Battlefield or Halo. The old menu's used to be clean, clear and fast. Now it's cluttered, unorganized, slow and they force you to view items you don't want to see just to increase sales. I feel bad for any designer that has to design it, because they are just forced to make bad UX decisions, even though they probably know better as well.
Any updates regarding the A-B testing? I really like your content. So much good information. I’m surprised you don’t have more views. Keep it up, brother.
Thank you so much for your support. I don't have an update for the test, I don't think I have enough conversation opportunities on my website to do such a test. Though this is something I really would like to find out some day.
Great video, informative & easy to digest! Would love to see more of your content. Your views & subscribers aren't doing you justice. Would've been even better if your case example at 08:40 had included how to make that website better. Keep it up!
I've always been pretty skeptical of overly pretty websites. They tend to get in the way of my UX. They tend to have poor navigation, scummy sales/conversion practices, and annoying amounts of scrolling and waiting. Also, interesting that you would say that gradients on buttons look outdated. I'll have to re-evaluate some of the buttons on my client's live site...
i'd argue that UI may influence people emotion therefore resulting in more purchases. but it's not really impactful in per section level but the impact explode when everything arranged in harmony. it just gives good mood along the scroll and resulting in people more leaning towards buying. what do you think?
@@arpitshrmah data supports that, it's called the Aesthetic-Usability Effect. According to Nielsen Norman Group: "Visual designs that appeal to your users have the side effect of making your site appear orderly, well-designed, and professional. Users are more likely to try a visually appealing site, and they’re more patient with minor issues."
Wikipedia is the standard for encyclopedia type pages. People are just used to it and other websites are cloning the same aesthetic. It would be a bad move to change Wikipedia in my opinion.
One thing to point out: Amazon and Wikipedia can get away with poor design because there are no alternatives. People will use them anyway, because there are no other options. Of course there are other online stores, but Amazon has some unique treats. And pricing. And a brand.
I think "getting away with" is not what they are doing, I think its intentional. They have every financial means for design overhauls if they wanted. If it works...
@@akyarenA lot of big companies don't redesign their sites according to the latest trends because there's a behavioral phenomenon in UX called change aversion, besides having other qualities that can sustain an outdated look. Amazon is a very innovative company that provides a unique service such as superfast delivery, a virtually free streaming service, and lower prices. New companies wouldn't face the same luck unless they could provide something as valuable. Design can be a great differentiator when your product becomes a commodity without any significant difference from your competitors. Design won't save a bad product/service, just help it.
My design strategy is: 1. Start with a word document to establish the content and hierarchy of information 2. Add some relevant pictures to improve the message 3. Build the layout in figma or on paper 4. Translate the layout to mobile design 5. Write the html, css and javascript
UI impresses the user, UX helps the user. The fun fact is that the help occurs without the knowledge of the user, that's the diff. Even with that being said, it's hard to me saying that UX is more important because if the design of a website literally sucks, the user won't stay on that page. For me is 50-50.
Good video, keep like that.
Agreed. Its like saying what MAKES a cup coffee and arguing if its the water the beans or the cup. Without one, the others dont make the whole, UI UX is 1 coin but 2 sides and in a 3D world we cant have 2D 1 sided coins, theres always 2 sides that make the coin.
But he said "simplistic" design for UX vs. UI.
That's because UI is a part of UX. UI is not more important than UX indeed, but a crucial important part of UX.
This video should be shown to people without UX experience. It feels like a lot of businesses prefer something that looks different and modern instead of giving a good user experience.
One of my biggest frustrations in recent years is the UX of big gaming franchises like Call of Duty, Battlefield or Halo. The old menu's used to be clean, clear and fast. Now it's cluttered, unorganized, slow and they force you to view items you don't want to see just to increase sales. I feel bad for any designer that has to design it, because they are just forced to make bad UX decisions, even though they probably know better as well.
It’s about building trust too. If you’re a visual product company then looking crap is not a great look. But otherwise, be usable!
currently watching each of you video, thanks for these.. I really want to be great in front-end
Any updates regarding the A-B testing? I really like your content. So much good information. I’m surprised you don’t have more views. Keep it up, brother.
Thank you so much for your support. I don't have an update for the test, I don't think I have enough conversation opportunities on my website to do such a test. Though this is something I really would like to find out some day.
Great video, informative & easy to digest! Would love to see more of your content. Your views & subscribers aren't doing you justice. Would've been even better if your case example at 08:40 had included how to make that website better. Keep it up!
I've always been pretty skeptical of overly pretty websites. They tend to get in the way of my UX. They tend to have poor navigation, scummy sales/conversion practices, and annoying amounts of scrolling and waiting. Also, interesting that you would say that gradients on buttons look outdated. I'll have to re-evaluate some of the buttons on my client's live site...
Watched a couple of your videos. As a designer, they helped me a lot! Thanks.
i'd argue that UI may influence people emotion therefore resulting in more purchases. but it's not really impactful in per section level but the impact explode when everything arranged in harmony. it just gives good mood along the scroll and resulting in people more leaning towards buying. what do you think?
Data is the king. Doesn't really matter what you or The Website Architect think. If data supports that, sure
@@arpitshrmah data supports that, it's called the Aesthetic-Usability Effect. According to Nielsen Norman Group: "Visual designs that appeal to your users have the side effect of making your site appear orderly, well-designed, and professional. Users are more likely to try a visually appealing site, and they’re more patient with minor issues."
Wikipedia is the standard for encyclopedia type pages. People are just used to it and other websites are cloning the same aesthetic. It would be a bad move to change Wikipedia in my opinion.
Underrated channel
Great information! UI complements UX.
One thing to point out: Amazon and Wikipedia can get away with poor design because there are no alternatives. People will use them anyway, because there are no other options. Of course there are other online stores, but Amazon has some unique treats. And pricing. And a brand.
I think "getting away with" is not what they are doing, I think its intentional. They have every financial means for design overhauls if they wanted. If it works...
@@akyarenA lot of big companies don't redesign their sites according to the latest trends because there's a behavioral phenomenon in UX called change aversion, besides having other qualities that can sustain an outdated look. Amazon is a very innovative company that provides a unique service such as superfast delivery, a virtually free streaming service, and lower prices. New companies wouldn't face the same luck unless they could provide something as valuable. Design can be a great differentiator when your product becomes a commodity without any significant difference from your competitors. Design won't save a bad product/service, just help it.
Berkshire Hathaway: Am I bad enough? 😅
My thought is that great UI is more important to web designers than it is to anyone else.
all UX have an UI.
Thank you! Awesome video
Great!
Modern Design Extension name plz😳?
Of course
wow nice
music in the background is very annoying
My design strategy is:
1. Start with a word document to establish the content and hierarchy of information
2. Add some relevant pictures to improve the message
3. Build the layout in figma or on paper
4. Translate the layout to mobile design
5. Write the html, css and javascript
I liked because “666” was a bad number…