Do We Still Have Ape Brains?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 4.3K

  • @m.streicher8286
    @m.streicher8286 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2130

    I never understood the idea that an evolutionary origin somehow diminishes our species.

    • @XKathXgames
      @XKathXgames 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +268

      If anything it's our ape brains that lets us be as intelligent.

    • @erikholgersson9235
      @erikholgersson9235 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +772

      It's because we are no longer Gods special children. It's basically saying to a spoiled child that thay are not the bestest most valuable thing on the planet. It's the truth, but people found it hard to swallow

    • @djdrocco
      @djdrocco 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Evolution contradicts the Special Old Book. On an individual level, it disturbs the blissful certainty of faith-based belief. In terms of power dynamics, it undermines the influence of religious establishments. Truth is the enemy of dogma, same as it ever was.

    • @ilikeRUNE
      @ilikeRUNE 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@XKathXgames you arent intelligent if you believe in evolution

    • @ilikeRUNE
      @ilikeRUNE 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@erikholgersson9235 low iq is the cause of the belief in evolution ... and these high production videos which shape the brains of low iq dense humans

  • @___.51
    @___.51 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1079

    It’s very comforting to believe that we’re just animals, using the same hardware as any other animal. It explains why we’re so imperfect. It helps me to feel compassion towards myself and others, instead of shame.

    • @19ate4
      @19ate4 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s actually disgusting and dehumanizing!!!
      there’s not one culture on earth that says that we came from monkeys but science says that we’re African monkeys that ran around the world that became Chinese and Europeans. I find this whole story to be racist and fucked up.

    • @firemangan
      @firemangan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

      If only everyone can feel the same.

    • @tenacityindarkess
      @tenacityindarkess 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this is so beautiful in a way
      @ThatGuy-bh9qh

    • @Manticore00
      @Manticore00 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      I think it’s comforting to people because if they’re right and there is no God or Afterlife at death it just ends, no matter what they did in life. But if they are wrong and there is a God or afterlife then eternal damnation or happiness could await them after death. It’s why I choose to believe in some sort of God, because if I live right and good, it’ll pay off, God or no God.

    • @shr1mppoboi950
      @shr1mppoboi950 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

      ​@Manticore00 "Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones."

  • @bluehorizon9547
    @bluehorizon9547 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    The ape that started with sharp stones, now with quantum computers, fusion reactors and multiverse portals.

    • @sparkofcuriousity
      @sparkofcuriousity 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Don't forget AI, nanotechnology and Gene manipulation :)

    • @DanCooper404
      @DanCooper404 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Don't forget antigravity, time travel, and faster-than-light travel.

    • @xenos_xd
      @xenos_xd หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I know we don't have multiverse portals but Ion care humanity solos rahhhh 🔥

    • @leojanuszewski1019
      @leojanuszewski1019 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Don't forget Joe Biden.

    • @unkouwnfigure2746
      @unkouwnfigure2746 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@leojanuszewski1019 A fine specimen indeed

  • @purplehaze2358
    @purplehaze2358 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +213

    "Homo sapiens have now reached the very pinnacle of encephalization, thus far, of any species on earth."
    The human says about itself.

    • @DaleOwens-x4q
      @DaleOwens-x4q 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      I'm convinced sperm whales and maybe a few other cetaceans possess higher raw intelligence than humans. We just hit the jackpot with opposable thumbs.

    • @hero303-gameplayindonesia8
      @hero303-gameplayindonesia8 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      ​@@DaleOwens-x4qinteresting take, I read somewhere that sperm whales and orcas (though the latter isn't really a cetacean) have language and dialects. It's just that our intelligence, combined with our environment and how our bodies are shaped allowed for more complex tool making and technological advancements, Whereas the ocean doesn't really support the idea of tool making.

    • @DaleOwens-x4q
      @DaleOwens-x4q 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@hero303-gameplayindonesia8Orcas are cetaceans. I've read somewhere, maybe a documentary too, that more advanced whale communication maybe be holographic in nature. Basically, they're able to form complex structures with their sonograms. But yes, our ability to manipulate our environment and pass on information via the written word has made all the difference.

    • @eedobee
      @eedobee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DaleOwens-x4qI don’t see any whales in the comments, only apes. Therefore apes > whale.

    • @whiskeytango9769
      @whiskeytango9769 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DaleOwens-x4q Humans have a 3 lb brain...Sperm whales have one that's 18 pounds...I tend to agree.

  • @andymcgowan9819
    @andymcgowan9819 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +445

    The way you tipped toed around the advent of the oldest profession amongst the Monkeys was epic.

    • @laaaliiiluuu
      @laaaliiiluuu 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ?

    • @dolbez9739
      @dolbez9739 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@laaaliiiluuu prostitution, the monkeys exchanged coins for food then gave the food to women to have sex.

    • @junodeer
      @junodeer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      @@laaaliiiluuumasturbation, dolphins do it too, and they are freaky with it 😭

    • @Princessk8
      @Princessk8 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +149

      ​@junodeer I think he meant prostitution. In regard to exchanging the food for sex

    • @cjroj7214
      @cjroj7214 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      What part of the video did this happen ??

  • @michaelwilliams2430
    @michaelwilliams2430 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +121

    There was a Seinfeld where a zoologist tells Kramer regarding a Chimp, "He's just an innocent primate." Kramer responds, "So am I!"

    • @Maximus_stupidus
      @Maximus_stupidus 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Lol kramer is fkn crazy

    • @letsdothis9063
      @letsdothis9063 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He spit on him, right?

    • @jimjones1130
      @jimjones1130 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      What did Kramer say about blacks?

  • @harlancollins1060
    @harlancollins1060 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +333

    I've been saying for years. We're still just cavemen hiding in our caves and hoarding food. Sometimes we'll go out and hunt/gather our stuff at the store. We really aren't all that much more advanced.
    Edit: I see a lot of people confuse complex for advanced…

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      Na see, its what takes place once in the cave that really matters. Sure the whole survival side of things would be similar since it simply works. Hunt, gather... not die. However with that free time much MUCH more advanced behaviors take place that is worlds apart from any primate on this planet. Them using a stick to get ants out of a log or a rock to crack a nut is pretty impressive yet here we are discussing this on a single crystal of sand in which we carved specific channels such that electrons can flow in such a way to perform calculations. The width of the gap between these two things is so incredibly vast its not even on the same chart. It requires precognition not only for our own future but the futures of our children's children's children to even begin. I am not sure as I have seen little to no evidence to suggest chimps are capable of recognizing the future of their species as a whole instead of simply ones own life.

    • @Monkey.D.Pression
      @Monkey.D.Pression 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      I'd say we're just looking for the same things (food,security, comfort) but cavemen cant walk on the moon and rocks can't run doom. We're the most advanced

    • @therealheyyous
      @therealheyyous 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I call us Modern primitives.

    • @markedis5902
      @markedis5902 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I’ve been saying for years that I aspire to be a caveman but a nice cave with hot and cold running water

    • @NewfieOn2Wheels
      @NewfieOn2Wheels 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      We're physiologically pretty well identical to the cave dwelling hunter gatherer homo sapiens of 100,000 years ago, you could time travel to the last ice age, kidnap an infant, and raise them today and they would fit in with no issues, achieve the same academic success and live just as full of a modern life. Our advancement is just built on the foundation of the advancements put in place by the thousands of generations before us.

  • @kellydalstok8900
    @kellydalstok8900 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

    Carl Linnaeus already noticed in the 1700s that he couldn’t really make a distinction between apes and humans when he tried to categorise them.

    • @CRT4Dummies
      @CRT4Dummies 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      One wears clothing, the others do not. How's that for a distinction?

    • @terdragontra8900
      @terdragontra8900 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      ​@@CRT4Dummies Well, lot of humans dont wear much clothes, especially historically. But yes, we can make them (well some can, i cant make clothes for myself!) because we are much cleverer than them, but that is a quantitative difference, not a qualitative one. Its a difference with immense consequences, but claiming that that makes us not apes is kinda like claiming bees are not insects, because of their remarkable behavior and success.

    • @texanman7191
      @texanman7191 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@CRT4Dummies he was comparing them by skeleton.
      Look at the human skeleton and compare it to a chimpanzee skeleton and gorilla skeleton.

    • @kudjoeadkins-battle2502
      @kudjoeadkins-battle2502 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@terdragontra8900more clever? Perhaps humans are all clever enough to adapt we are a highly adaptable species.

    • @Zombie-lx3sh
      @Zombie-lx3sh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nor should he, since humans are apes.

  • @TheGarmisch
    @TheGarmisch 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +447

    I can't be the only one who treats these videos like a guided meditation hour

    • @mariosevangelou7278
      @mariosevangelou7278 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ❤ me exactly

    • @kaiezesi6630
      @kaiezesi6630 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Before n after work 😅

    • @sojh17
      @sojh17 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Definitely not the only one

    • @maxoweenie
      @maxoweenie 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      I use it to fall asleep (in the best way possible!)

    • @PowerScissor
      @PowerScissor 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Every night for as long as they've been around.

  • @Fun_Dips
    @Fun_Dips 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +372

    The production value of all your videos, across ALL YOUR accounts, is friggin incredible man!

    • @CarlosGutierrez-ef2pd
      @CarlosGutierrez-ef2pd 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      It's definitely a Team

    • @craigwright7768
      @craigwright7768 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      What other account have they got? Ad love more content from these amazing people

    • @nicolainielsen7700
      @nicolainielsen7700 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      ​@@craigwright7768History of the Universe, History of the Earth, and Voices from the Past are the 3 others that I know of.

    • @MrSneakyGunz
      @MrSneakyGunz 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Look at the "channels" tab. It's to the right of Videos, Playlist, Community, etc.

    • @nicolainielsen7700
      @nicolainielsen7700 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @lit22006 Absolutely. And the Earth is flat right?

  • @user-pz4su9fi9r
    @user-pz4su9fi9r 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    For a channel this new, this feels exactly like a David Attenborough documentary. Well done!

    • @eingrobernerzustand3741
      @eingrobernerzustand3741 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      They run three other channels.
      History of the earth, History of the Universe, and Voices of the past.
      All of them are worth checking out.

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video just called you a monkey's nephew, and you think it was great? It's an insult. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

    • @BenDovers48372Channel
      @BenDovers48372Channel 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@eingrobernerzustand3741Got any recommendations for more videos like these?

    • @BlueBonnie764
      @BlueBonnie764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ditto🌎

  • @DavidinDetroit8157
    @DavidinDetroit8157 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    I can't believe this channel isn't more popular. Well thought out and narrated script, awesome video content, A++ in my book.

    • @Skiskiski
      @Skiskiski 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This would make the Bible a lie. The Bible states, it is impossible for God to lie. Adam and Eve were our first human parents who were created by God, not born from apes. Making us human too. We did not evolve from apes.

    • @shellos8
      @shellos8 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think it's a fairly new channel, and they haven't posted a lot of videos. I love their content and hope to see much more.

    • @BenDovers48372Channel
      @BenDovers48372Channel 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@shellos8I saw another comment saying it’s a new channel but they have 3 total channels.

  • @khalidalali186
    @khalidalali186 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    I watched this, and shared it with someone, whom I thought was a friend, and he, goes and reports me to the religious police, for spreading “Evolutionary Literature” among the masses haha, I kid you not. I had to sign a paper just half an hour ago, not to do it again, and yet, here we are 😂😅
    Awesome video dude! I was always under the assumption, that you only had one channel, “Voices from the Past.”
    A job well done. Truly, I thank you so very much.

    • @harrietharlow9929
      @harrietharlow9929 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Oh brother! I really wish religion would just give it a rest! Stay safe.

    • @siyacer
      @siyacer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What?!

    • @Mike-dn7ul
      @Mike-dn7ul 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Voicers from the past? !! thank you for that tidbit! And condolences for your ridiculous misfortune!

    • @user-th9tg3bc1g
      @user-th9tg3bc1g 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I would not have signed ,I personally would have gotten myself a banana. Stand by what you believe in !

    • @DonnaCsuti-ji2dd
      @DonnaCsuti-ji2dd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Better find new friends

  • @irishrebel1976
    @irishrebel1976 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

    That was one of the best things I’ve ever seen. So in depth and fascinating. Great job to your whole team. Keep up the great work!

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video is full of disinformation. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

    • @josephinetracy1485
      @josephinetracy1485 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just regurgitating mainstream drivel for clicks.

    • @jimjones1130
      @jimjones1130 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Calm down it was ok...
      Where you high when you wrote that lol?

  • @malegria9641
    @malegria9641 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    alfred russel wallace was honestly such a chill dude. when darwin came out with the same idea before him and got all the credit, he wasnt upset about it, he actually went out of his way to defend darwins way of thinking and research.

  • @Derly24
    @Derly24 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    “We are all homos… homo-sapiens.”
    -Michael Scott

  • @cjcogburn30
    @cjcogburn30 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    I am always so baffled by how good these videos are. Like where are you even getting some of these clips?

    • @metal_pipe9764
      @metal_pipe9764 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Earth

    • @myhksm3025
      @myhksm3025 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@metal_pipe9764 sphere earth I'd suggest, to avoid further confusions because we have folks living in the same earth religiously believe it's flat.😂

  • @nmarrs8539
    @nmarrs8539 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Yes. I don’t need to watch this to know that humans are still animals nothing more. We tell ourselves we’re some how more evolved than that so we can feel special.

    • @turntoyou
      @turntoyou 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I mean, if we're entirely natural with nothing else going on I'd be happy to quit worrying over how we treat the planet or other animals or each other. Morality is just a huge bummer tbh, nobody's mad at the rest of the zoo, even the nasty penguins (and they do some completely unmentionable stuff)

    • @user-fo8ey1ix6f
      @user-fo8ey1ix6f 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      A meaningless statement from a meaningless monkey right?

    • @ClannCholmain
      @ClannCholmain 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@user-fo8ey1ix6f😂
      Americans think they’re exceptional.

    • @fetafox
      @fetafox 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      collective narcissism really

    • @Scorned405
      @Scorned405 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are u gonna say that on judgement day when u are judged by Jesus?? Are u gonna say “ we are just animals “ before he gives u an eternal sentence to the lake of fire??

  • @mostrecenthero
    @mostrecenthero 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +259

    We’ve always been apes, and always will be apes. This was an extremely educational and enlighteningly thought provoking dwelling into the psyche of those we share our global home with.

    • @theender664
      @theender664 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      We won't be apes always
      Atleast we don't have to be

    • @theflyingdutchguy9870
      @theflyingdutchguy9870 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      havent always been. but yes, sinds there have been apes we have always been apes

    • @theflyingdutchguy9870
      @theflyingdutchguy9870 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@theender664well yes, actually. nothing outgrows their amcestory like that. same as us still being primates. the name ape would just be pushed further. but we will never not be apes. like we will never not be mammals. just like we will never not be vertibrates even if we lose our vertibre.

    • @DerekHowden
      @DerekHowden 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      it's understood that we had a pre ape that both humans and apes diverged from. Humans and chimps on one branch and apes on the other so technically we are cousins to apes and not apes. I'm not sure why the video says this, maybe the AI or researcher that wrote it used old material as a source.

    • @theender664
      @theender664 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DerekHowden we are apes

  • @dylananderson7658
    @dylananderson7658 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Such wonderful and beautifully narrated content - thank you.

  • @unpunnyfuns
    @unpunnyfuns 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    What? It's only been 2 weeks since your last masterpiece! Thank you!

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video just called you a monkey's nephew, and you think it was a masterpiece? It's an insult. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

  • @characterblub2.0
    @characterblub2.0 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    "Do we still have ape brains?"
    Well, we're apes, so... 😂

    • @Mr.Hazama-YuukiTerumi
      @Mr.Hazama-YuukiTerumi 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Welp, time to put you humans in a zoo

    • @danhtran6401
      @danhtran6401 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I came from Adam and Eve so I got human brains...phewww..

    • @characterblub2.0
      @characterblub2.0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @danhtran6401 No one cares about your cult but other cultists.

    • @pinopalotta
      @pinopalotta หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@danhtran6401 Nice fantasy bed story

    • @danhtran6401
      @danhtran6401 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pinopalotta you willing to bet your life on it?

  • @user-ul7fq8zw8o
    @user-ul7fq8zw8o 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    I never have understood why we equate bigger brains with higher intelligence. I've seen people with huge heads be as dumb as a rock and a people with tiny heads be genius. Possibly those old brains were small but highly intelligent.

    • @martinsmith6049
      @martinsmith6049 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've seen a massive Western nation elect a geriatric dodddering idiot as leader.

    • @kennyl4699
      @kennyl4699 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is true that in terms of humans' brain-to-body ratio, our brains are massive. But it is also true that a physically larger head or brain doesn't necessarily equate to higher intelligence. Birds' brains are physically small, but they are intelligent, social animals. Whales' brains are physically larger than humans' brains, but we're obviously more intelligent than them.
      Jehovah's Witnesses have used the "Women's heads are smaller, their brains are smaller" argument to indicate they're lesser than men and justify subjugating them. That's not how it works.

    • @plant-based-carnist
      @plant-based-carnist 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      ...Bigger brains have bigger chance of higher intelligence. The folds and creases in the brain which makes more brain surface area also helps. The other factor is the number of neurons in the cerebral cortex. The most intelligent creatures have all big brains like the elephant or the whale but humans have the most neurons in the cerebral cortex and the most crease and folds in the brain.

    • @mtman2
      @mtman2 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@plant-based-carnist
      Now understood as smarter then the apes are some birds...!

    • @johncassidy6574
      @johncassidy6574 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ha ha!!!

  • @loretta_3843
    @loretta_3843 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    What a coincidence! I only found out about Wallace (it was in relation to the "Wallace line") yesterday and here I find him mentioned in your video. He'll probably start popping up everywhere now!☺️

    • @Hundredyacrewoods
      @Hundredyacrewoods 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If you want to know more about him Bill Bailey did a 2 episode BBC documentary on him called " Bill Bailey's Jungle Hero" that's quite good.

    • @loretta_3843
      @loretta_3843 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Hundredyacrewoods ah! Thank you! I said he'd start popping up everywhere ☺️😄

    • @VenkataramanaPullela
      @VenkataramanaPullela 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Hundredyacrewoods0

    • @ihatespam2
      @ihatespam2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He’s always been there.

  • @johnshields6852
    @johnshields6852 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    My son was born in 1981, at about 1 month old we brought him to Drs for a checkup, the Dr sat him on the table and put his thumbs in my son's palms and rubbed them, then without warning pulls his arms up very quickly, to my shock my son was hanging on easily, then the Dr starts swinging him and he's holding on like he'd been doing it forever, it was stunning and convinced me that we definitely had a history in trees, anyone with a baby knows how good of a grip they have but it was amazing.

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It takes quite a leap to go from grasping a person's thumb to living in trees. I hope you didn't let your your baby dung like apes do. There are monumental differences between apes and humans structurally, behaviorally, physically, and in every other way. Videos like this use false equivocations in an attempt to minimize the differences between humans and apes. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

  • @TheCatzilla1
    @TheCatzilla1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Oh my lord, this episode was mind-blowing. Keep up the great work

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video was full of disinformation. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

  • @cinemaipswich4636
    @cinemaipswich4636 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It's good to see the crew who made "History of the Universe" (well worth watching) now spreading out to the other Sciences. They do great work and produce professional documentaries.

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video is full of disinformation, not science. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

  • @_robustus_
    @_robustus_ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +162

    It was always fascinating watching these brutal behaviors play out back when I was studying primatology. Sadly it was our species not theirs that I was seeing.

    • @StanSwan
      @StanSwan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then you are showing your bias. Many species kill for fun.

    • @19ate4
      @19ate4 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you believe you are an African monkey, then there’s no saving you
      Does human beings each other even beings like chimpanzees??
      The biggest thing for me is, how does humans sweats and apes do not this is a huge thing. It’s like trying to tell me a sperm whale somehow became bald eagle, but I just had to believe you because of the science.

    • @Whit-mh9nt
      @Whit-mh9nt 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unfortunately human intelligence varies wildly, from the common dumb as a stone type who is responsible for the violence and misery we inflict on every species on the planet, to the very rare individual capable of fathoming the deepest levels of the function of the universe, who is generally not very popular with the average primate on the street...

    • @willywonka4340
      @willywonka4340 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      lol😂

    • @Ezekiel903
      @Ezekiel903 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if evolution is true, what's next? will a new hominid appear and take the lead, or a new Fungus? otherwise this whole theory has many flaws, we see only species disappearing. Beside that, if not a new hominid or so will appear it means the whole evolution was here only to create us, bcs it seems we are the pinnacle of evolution right now and a similar species that can speak, using tools and can create machinery is no were to see. This whole things makes no sense, it seems more that somebody created us! Or are this UAP's/UFO's the ext evolution but we can't recognize it bcs it is already far ahead!!!

  • @jimc.goodfellas
    @jimc.goodfellas 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    This is going to be such a great series

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video is full of disinformation. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

    • @harrietharlow9929
      @harrietharlow9929 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely!

  • @bcurtis363
    @bcurtis363 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    This was great. I have always been irritated when people act like we humans are somehow not a terrestrial animal. We are just as primitive in our design as any other primate.

    • @tekcomputers
      @tekcomputers 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-ts1kj1te2j Humans don't have a concept of god either. We have an inventive imaginative element within our brains born from a desire to seek out patterns steming from early survival needs which benefited pattern recognition. It is the same thing which drives humans to "see" patterns where none exist because elements of it benefit our more advanced conception of tool making compared to other primates. Mythical god-beings are simply an outworking of that, there is no singular "concept of god" in humanity..... it's a mythical thing which varies considerably by population and over time.

    • @basedgodkyon
      @basedgodkyon 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jdrhea6712 What is an ape?

    • @TheMysteriousgirl9
      @TheMysteriousgirl9 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Have you heard about Anunnaki theory? This is what these people probably meant.
      TLDR: Anunnaki(aliens/gods from sky) converted some apes into slightly smarter versions for excavating minerals or anything else.
      Later they left Earth, but slightly smarter apes stayed to evolve further.

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video was full of misinformation and disinformation. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

    • @mtman2
      @mtman2 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@TheMysteriousgirl9
      Right so then from what did "they" eminate"...?
      Gotta start somewhere huh...!

  • @Nomadestra
    @Nomadestra 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    We as a species are still recovering from millions of years of horrors and stress that comes with trying to survive against weather, predators, diseases that saw our ancestors dead with no explanation. It's no wonder we still have so many psychological and neurological disorders that we still can't figure out how to cure. Catch me in 20 million years though.
    Then there's the exponential explosion of population increase. On the grand timeline of us it wasn't that long ago that our ancestors could do a 360 spin and see everyone that you knew you could trust and whom belonged to the same tribe you did. Then within thousands of years you see major towns and cities where you go all day moving amongst conplete strangers. In our primitive ape brain that translates to non stop analyzing every being because it might be an enemy. We are fucked up haha.

    • @Inmate16
      @Inmate16 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Finally, someone who’s actually smart and sane. You have no idea how long it took me to find you, but I agree with you completely.

    • @EFCDKZ
      @EFCDKZ หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Amazing comment. Explains why some people (me included) don’t deal very well in major cities and highly populated areas. I hate it.

  • @dfgdfg_
    @dfgdfg_ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Delightful timing, thanks team!

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video just called you a monkey's nephew, and you think it was delightful? It's an insult. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

  • @SB-qm5wg
    @SB-qm5wg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I was wondering if you'd mention the Chip Wars of Gombe. And you started off with it 👏

  • @nerysghemor5781
    @nerysghemor5781 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I'm a Christian and I don't understand what the "problem" is with evolution. I guess if you're a strict literalist with Genesis it's a issue but otherwise, it just means we're learning more about how that creation happened. Even the branches that died out still serve a very useful purpose in the lessons they teach us about how our own biology works, how species interact with each other and their environments, and similarly, the types of damage we risk doing by our own actions if we aren't careful. We learn both what it's possible for us to do, and what the potential consequences of those actions are.

    • @Axxe80
      @Axxe80 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly. Actually one could read it as agreeing to the scientific facts:
      Day 1: Light

    • @nerysghemor5781
      @nerysghemor5781 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Axxe80 What’s hilarious too is when I was a kid the birds seemed weirdly out of order. Then we confirmed where birds came from: dinosaurs. 🤣 It always cracks me up now to see a tiny little sparrow peeping in the yard and to remember that’s a dino!

    • @Axxe80
      @Axxe80 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nerysghemor5781 Yes, I think that's funny too. Actually (not a joke!) they found dormant DNA sequences coding for a dinosaur like reptilian tail in chicken DNA.

    • @nerysghemor5781
      @nerysghemor5781 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Axxe80 Wow!! Has anyone actually activated it and did the tail come out with feathers?

    • @Axxe80
      @Axxe80 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nerysghemor5781 As far as I know that hasn't been done until now - although an early form of it has been observed on chicken embryos but until hatching it has completly recessed.

  • @InHouseMaterial
    @InHouseMaterial 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Amazing as always. All your channels are fantastic quality. Thanks so much

  • @rararasputin7017
    @rararasputin7017 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Me have ape brain. Me see video that make brain tingle with smart. Me click. Me happy...

  • @chegeny
    @chegeny 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Nice vid, excellent production. Pretty hilarious how the Bonobos just solve everything with sex.

    • @snorkman2
      @snorkman2 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Apparently, they are stuck in the 60's, where as, the chimpanzees are stuck in the 50's.

    • @harrietharlow9929
      @harrietharlow9929 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@snorkman2 I'll take the 60s over the 50s anytime.

  • @michaelbatarick9617
    @michaelbatarick9617 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Not too sure, but whatever kind of brain I have, really enjoys every one of these creators videos

    • @19ate4
      @19ate4 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have a hybrid brain from a dead homing, not a fucking ape
      Because if the theory of evolution is true, why is it still called a theory after we mapped out the human Genome?

  • @hdew12354
    @hdew12354 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That thumbnail was RISKY god damn smart video though very well edited and very well written!

  • @grindingice
    @grindingice 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    One of my favourite lines from one of my favourite songs shows an observer watching all the species on earth from above...and they can't quite understand how we f'd up the gift of intelligence we were given....
    'Monkey killing monkey killing monkey over pieces of the ground
    Silly monkeys, give them thumbs they make a club and beat their brother down'
    (So true)
    And in the end we are of course still apes...we're just talking monkeys really

    • @characterblub2.0
      @characterblub2.0 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How they survive so misguided is a mystery 🤔

    • @BennyAscent
      @BennyAscent 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Repugnant is a creature who would squander the ability to lift an eye to heaven conscious of his fleeting time here

    • @sidpomy
      @sidpomy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And yet our ability to think in a way to produce that poem shows we are of both chimp and bonobo tendencies. Many comments are belittling humanity, but our capacity for community and stewardship are beyond compare. That just cohabitates with competitiveness and aggression. Both are evident in every human - the literal devil and angel on our shoulders. In some ways our ability to meld the two are likely the reason for our precipitous development of this technological civilization.

    • @godamid4889
      @godamid4889 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@sidpomywe are not doing as good as you imagine.
      Were we not prolific breeders, we would be a blip on ancient history.

  • @owenpancoast1163
    @owenpancoast1163 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Can’t believe I get to watch this for free!!!

  • @bobdillaber1195
    @bobdillaber1195 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    What a solid and fine documentary. I learned much just sitting back and enjoying it.

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video just called you a monkey's nephew, and you think it was fine? It's an insult. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

  • @AM-sw9di
    @AM-sw9di 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Recently ive been thinking that perhaps emotionally we are indistinguishable from apes. It explains why despite being capable of logical thinking we are rarely persuaded by it, instead making decisions based on unavoidable beliefs and biases that we often do not realise have an emotional and instinctual basis. We constantly act outsude their better judgement, even to the point of harming ourselves, yet we can create layers and layers of rationale, intricate hypotheses, fantasies, beliefs, moral justifications around the reason why we do things or why we think something. Our brains allow us to do this, it makes sense to me that we may not have changed much emotionally and instinctually from the other apes, our brains are built on the brains of old, reptilian, mammalian etc. Nature seems to only extend our capabilities, create more options to which we can (for lack of a better word) express ourselves. I'm sure if bonobos or chimpanzees developed the same mental and language capabilities as humans they too would be justifying their natures in similar complex ways, and struggling with cultural changes as we do now. It is true that groups of primates in seperate areas can develop different cultures in something as simple as the way they hunt or forage.

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is full of false equivocations. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

  • @Latruchasamarah
    @Latruchasamarah 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    In my opinión: language + writing is what made us what we are.

    • @purplehaze2358
      @purplehaze2358 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Language ain’t unique. Dolphins have vocal language so complex that they even assign each other names.
      Written language specifically, though, is something I’m not sure exists elsewhere in the animal kingdom.

    • @baykkus
      @baykkus 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@purplehaze2358 Human language is unique, the kind of information you can process and give with it is far more complex than that of any otehr animal. Language does set us apart, we all have capacity for written language but we were already different before we invented writing.

    • @godamid4889
      @godamid4889 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@baykkuscomplexity doesn't make it unique.

    • @pureone8350
      @pureone8350 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@purplehaze2358You are forgetting that you are communicating with another human through the internet across the globe. That is unique amongst us, it is still language.

    • @purplehaze2358
      @purplehaze2358 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pureone8350 That's still written language, even if the medium is different - which I myself have said is, as far as I can tell, distinct from that of other animals.

  • @telumatramenti7250
    @telumatramenti7250 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    30:20 The narrator appears to be suggesting that cranial volume is a reliable measure of intelligence and capacity for complex abstract cognition. While this mostly holds for hominids, - there is no direct positive correlation between intelligence and brain volume in the same specie, and in general, across mammals, large brains aren't always an indicator of superior intelligence. Dolphins, for example, have a much larger brain-to-body ratio than humans, however, most of that tissue is tasked with hunting and breeding in a 3-D environment. So the relationship isn't that simple. Rather than just volume, - what also matters a lot is the level of innervation of tissue, and function, or rather what the tissue is used for. If we take Cognitive Tradeoff idea seriously, then what separates us from all other animals - is how we use the small patch of tissue across Prefrontal and Parietal lobes. Chimps use it for superior visual memory and humans use it, in connection with Wernike area to behold worlds and universes and to talk about talking about thinking about thinking, the way I just did. The tradeoff, of course is that we suck at remembering positions of multiple objects we saw only for a split second. Chimps are simply unbeatable at those tasks, however - Complex Abstract Cognition, (that which makes us human) confers an enormous advantage to Homo not-so-sapiens.

  • @matanyaholmes3964
    @matanyaholmes3964 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Beautiful, watched the whole thing in one sitting. Fascinating as always.
    Well written, produced and thought out. ❤

    • @buttercxpdraws8101
      @buttercxpdraws8101 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is watching something for 55 minutes in one sitting a long time for you? Would you usually need to break up an hour long show into different sittings to finish it? You must have an incredibly busy life or a very short attention span lol ✌️😁

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video is full of disinformation. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

    • @godamid4889
      @godamid4889 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@buttercxpdraws8101that's an arrogant and shitty thing to say.

  • @Argethebarge
    @Argethebarge 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Love your guys content. Been binge watching all of these mini docs. Keep up the awesome work.

  • @AtamMardes
    @AtamMardes 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    "Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool." -- Voltaire

    • @JimK1rk
      @JimK1rk 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      👀

    • @johnsherfey3675
      @johnsherfey3675 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Religion began when certain thoughts were more advantageous to think than others for survival.

    • @godamid4889
      @godamid4889 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@johnsherfey3675fear and ignorance as tools were available before religion.
      Indoctrinating that fear and ignorance into babies was the proud achievement of religion.

    • @johnsherfey3675
      @johnsherfey3675 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@godamid4889 Depends on the religion and what their teaching or reinforcing.

    • @DonnaCsuti-ji2dd
      @DonnaCsuti-ji2dd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for the quote I didn't know that one appreciate it

  • @knowledgableed9607
    @knowledgableed9607 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Excellent documentary. It delivers a depth that most others do not. I hope the channel grows and continues to deliver great content.

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video is full of disinformation. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

  • @kwitshadie6539
    @kwitshadie6539 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Only 2 videos and you already do documentaries like they were on the History Channel in the 2000’s.
    Way to go OP! 😀

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video just called you a monkey's nephew, and you said, "way to go?" It's an insult. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

  • @matt47110815
    @matt47110815 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As older I get, the more primitive I see humans to be. The clapping of hands, the screaming of passengers in an airplane experiencing turbulence, hysterical laughter.... we are Apes! 😅
    We still produce energy by fire/heating water (although,we figured out to boil water via nuclear power, so that's something), we still basically throw rocks at each other in anger, we just replaced the stone with metal and let gunpowder do the more forceful throwing.

  • @JeffreyPar-pr2zw
    @JeffreyPar-pr2zw 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Humans did not evolve from bonobos, chimps, or orangutans. 40 M years ago, a tree dwelling mammal evolved a branch intp bipedal bonobos, apes, chimps, etc. Then about 7 million years ago the tree dwelling mammal branched into other bipedal mammals that eventually evolved into homosapiens, which is that we are. This is diverging evolution, when there is a branch and the species evolves into two separate species. This is a basic generalization. We have a common ancestry of bonobos, so we have some similarities but did not evolve from bonobos, chimps, etc.

  • @PitboyHarmony1
    @PitboyHarmony1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Let (or perhaps ... make) a young earth creationist watch this.
    Any one of them with the slightest intellectual capability,
    would not be able to finish this video,
    without walking away from their brainwashed belief.

    • @theflyingdutchguy9870
      @theflyingdutchguy9870 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      lets challenge kent hovind to watch it😂

    • @rickkwitkoski1976
      @rickkwitkoski1976 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @PitboyHarmony1
      Read the comments... they're watching. But only the dumb ones

    • @PitboyHarmony1
      @PitboyHarmony1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theflyingdutchguy9870 - I did say "with the slightest intellectual capability" ... soo that kinda locks hovind out. He's far too trapped in his self made bubble of illness.

  • @ripvanwinkle2002
    @ripvanwinkle2002 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    anyone who has spent 5 minutes in a walmart or tescos already knows the answer to this question

  • @BlackStar250874
    @BlackStar250874 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This, like you other channels is a treasure chest. Thank you for these.
    They are, as always, the best documentaries about certain subjects that I have seen.

  • @redwatch.
    @redwatch. 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I can't wait for more videos. This channel has become my favorite. Excellent narration, writing and visual content.

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video is full of disinformation. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

  • @ryansergas2776
    @ryansergas2776 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    We are literally apes, so yes.

  • @speedingatheist
    @speedingatheist 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great video. The thumbnail and title not so much. We will ALWAYS be apes and have ape brains. There's no way to escape the family tree.

    • @louismcglasson7913
      @louismcglasson7913 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We should be so lucky, haha, (I’m not sure you catch my drift .) 8:01

  • @HumanBeing1974
    @HumanBeing1974 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    When I hear people in any groups I always feel like I am hearing a bunch of Apes whooping and hollering 😂
    You should do a video with side by side comparisons just with that. We sound Exactly like each other in groups.

    • @zombie6386
      @zombie6386 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I think the same when I hear people laugh! Or when I myself laugh. Laughing just sounds so ape like and primal to me.

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Two things sounding alike doesn't mean they are the same or even related in any way. When I hear a parrot repeating human language I don't assume it descended from humans. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@zombie6386 when I laugh I think about what made me laugh, not apes. Sounds like someone has conditioned you to think about apes when you laugh. I would encourage you to not think of yourself as not being human.

    • @zombie6386
      @zombie6386 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@refuse2bdcvd324 I don’t think of apes when I laugh man it’s just something I’ve passingly thought of a few times when hearing groups of people laughing or a few times when I have laughed. Because it does sound similar to the whooping of a primate. We are primates after all man.

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@zombie6386 the term "primate" is a designation created by humans for the purpose of categorization, but there are clear and insurmountable differences between humans and animals. Apes don't consider humans to be part of their group in any way. They can't shed tears, build houses, make clothes, make boats, or do anything for their advancement. They are stuck doing the same thing, living in the same area generation after generation. You are not an ape and the term "primate" is only a superficial label. You are a human, made in the image of God. Anyone who tells you otherwise is trying to diminish you.

  • @ChefVegan
    @ChefVegan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I saw a woman taking a selfie with a wind chime today.

  • @99goat99
    @99goat99 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Beautiful and profound video. Anyone who has had a dog knows that even they have emotional states, and can consider their recent past actions through the lens of judgement - both their own and that of their pack leader. (Us). I have a parrot that I've come to read and understand in a way that you might someone of a different culture and language. The intelligence is certainly there, as is play, mischief, problem solving and emotional states. ("Moods"). The brain in this bird is the size of a pecan, but capable of all that and perhaps more. Their evolution is far more direct across that past 570 million years while human evolution is start and stop, extinctions and then a massive opportunity to fill ecological gaps over the past 66 million years. Birds are dinosaurs, a direct continuation of a lineage that began 190 million years before that, and back to amphibians, fish, chordates, etc. Meanwhile, the most advanced mammal 66 million years ago was no bigger than a 40 pound groundhog.

    • @origamiswami2275
      @origamiswami2275 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Forty Pound Groundhog Day AGAIN?

    • @kendexter
      @kendexter 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Spot on. living with dogs for almost 60 years i can confirm that

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video is full of disinformation. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

    • @kellydalstok8900
      @kellydalstok8900 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It is the ratio of brain size to body size that determines intelligence. The corvids are very intelligent too. Their problem solving skills are incredible. And there’s a video on YT of a crow using the lid of a jar to repeatedly sled down a snow covered roof.

  • @DarthStuticus
    @DarthStuticus 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    We cannot fail to have a brain that is of a Clade we belong to, so yes. We still have Ape brains.

  • @highfive7689
    @highfive7689 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Yes we essentially are. Down to our rain dance rituals evolved into complicated ballroom stage performance. Devolving in our 21st century drug induced hookup clubs back into our ancestral rain dances performances. Lol

  • @Krishna-Govender
    @Krishna-Govender 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Interestingly, the Hindu Vedas support the theory of evolution. It describes humans as transforming from fish to reptile to mammal to ape to man. There is also a final form that hasn't been attained yet.

    • @paulgoogol2652
      @paulgoogol2652 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It has. It is crab.

    • @ihatespam2
      @ihatespam2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      People see things in metaphors all the time. Some claim the Bible shows it. We see what we want, but if they knew this, they would have not been so vague and unable to make advances.

    • @enammemberseptember7366
      @enammemberseptember7366 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      There IS no final form, because evolution doesn't have a predetermined pathway. Evolution is adaptation to a certain environment, when environmental conditions change, the organisms most suited to the change survive and reproduce. The traits that adapted them to the change become more prominent

    • @NotSoNormal1987
      @NotSoNormal1987 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Crab is the ultimate form

  • @CarlWinter-oy8uf
    @CarlWinter-oy8uf 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The modern human skeleton still shows the vestigial remains of a" tail "---known as the coccyx ! Ask Jane Goodall why this exists ?

    • @CarlWinter-oy8uf
      @CarlWinter-oy8uf 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I DO KNOW WHY !---IT WAS A RHETORICAL QUESTION /STATEMENTfrom a devoted Darwinist --coccyx proves we descended from apes !!--

    • @reksraven
      @reksraven 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@CarlWinter-oy8uf pleasae say you aren't a darwinist anymore? Darwin is nice and all but quite outdated.

  • @tleon858
    @tleon858 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Are hardcore sports fans aware their behaviors are mimicking the chimpanzee's brush rattling?

    • @ghostfacepacifist6046
      @ghostfacepacifist6046 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes we're aware and proud 🗣 its the same with you geeks seeing a hot girl in comic con

  • @airpower7692
    @airpower7692 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So the title of this is the same thing of asking does a duck still have bird feathers

  • @advanced_monkey_2891
    @advanced_monkey_2891 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Yeah we're literally just slightly more advanced great apes, nothing more, nothing less either.

  • @gambitstill
    @gambitstill 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Im a huge lurker. Just want to say these videos you make are absolutely amazing for people like me. I have always been an academic but due to my own misfortune, I screwed up and am doing other things. Your videos allow to me to believe (for better or for worse), that I am in tune with modern day science. It is super important to me. Keep up the great work and I will be donating/subcribing soon to help support :)

  • @googleyoutubechannel8554
    @googleyoutubechannel8554 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Yes, quite literally we _still_ are. Wait until you find out we always _will be_ . By definition.

    • @AmandaHugandKiss411
      @AmandaHugandKiss411 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very true observation...

    • @ihatespam2
      @ihatespam2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, everything continues to evolve whales used to run around on land etc. we can evolve to a new species, after a few million years…

  • @NightfallShadow
    @NightfallShadow หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yes, we are apes. Deal with it YEC

  • @abelhapedras
    @abelhapedras 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    thank you, Carys! what a wonderful video!

  • @sarper9016
    @sarper9016 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Our ego surpasses our intelligence

    • @ihatespam2
      @ihatespam2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Speak for yourself

  • @dodoraptor8387
    @dodoraptor8387 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Homo sapiens (modern man) appeared around about 200k ago...I would assume that our brains didn't not change much from that time, but our humanoid ancestor australopichetus which was part ape and human had a much smaller brain size...As we changed our diet and habits our brains also changed, and we acquired new cognitive abilities, but deep down we still have our instinctive and more primitive brain

    • @harrietharlow9929
      @harrietharlow9929 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right. We have built a more complex brain on top of an older, more primitive primate brain. And underneath the more primitive ape brain is an even older reptilian brain. I think accepting that all these brains factor into human behaviour/thought does explain much about us.

    • @reksraven
      @reksraven 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      we are still apes tho.
      It goes eukaryiotes, vertibrate, mammal, ape, human.
      Now this is old taxonomy but the new one is a bit long and that is still servicable. Point being. We are still apes.

  • @LAkadian
    @LAkadian 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Listen to people laugh and cry and then try to tell me that isn't a monkey.

    • @Brandon-eo6mx
      @Brandon-eo6mx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ikr! Thats what i always thought

    • @itsClaptrap
      @itsClaptrap 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      or inversely, listen to apes playing. Listen to their vocalizations, their screams, especially in distress, sound eerily similar to a person screaming in terror

    • @tonyhawksproskater2406
      @tonyhawksproskater2406 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Chimps all have different finger prints, just like us.
      Its hard to not believe in this..

  • @despinaarzouman3080
    @despinaarzouman3080 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    We're apes. I see it in humanity all the time. Many drive cars too.

  • @kade-qt1zu
    @kade-qt1zu 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Average Creationist Comment Cycle be like:
    1. Creationist leaves comment stating evolution is false.
    2. Commenter responds stating evolution is true.
    3. Creationist leaves comment stating there is no scientific evidence for evolution.
    4. Commenter responds with comment containing scientific evidence for evolution.
    5. Creationist states that scientific evidence for evolution is not enough and shifts goal post.
    6. Repeat steps 3-5 50-500 times.
    7. Conversation ends with creationist either being humiliated or commenter getting bored/tired and leaving.

  • @saladinbob
    @saladinbob 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    So I've a question about the Chimpanzee war. How do we know they didn't learn it from us humans? There's no shortage of conflict, and we know they have the capability to learn, so perhaps they learned warfare from us? Just a thought.

    • @jamiecullum5567
      @jamiecullum5567 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because its pretty obvious they didnt. How do you imagine them learning it from us?

    • @gurk_the_magnificent9008
      @gurk_the_magnificent9008 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It’s more that their actions in the Chimpanzee War displayed a much more sophisticated level of social organization and grasp of strategy and tactics than anyone expected. It wasn’t a case where two groups of chimps happened to run into each other, had a fight, and one side won; one of the groups made a conscious, deliberate group decision to the wipe the other group out, developed a plan to do that, and worked together to carry it out.
      Animals will fight among each other, of course, and violently predate their own and other species, but this was the first time we had witnessed anything other than humans engaging in organized violence in pursuit of an abstract goal. The cognitive ability to do that isn’t something that can be learned.

    • @firemangan
      @firemangan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Warfare isn’t really a human invention, species have had inter species conflicts for as long as life have existed. Ants have been around long before we came into being and ant colonies are pretty much known to go into conflict with other ant colonies.

    • @theflyingdutchguy9870
      @theflyingdutchguy9870 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      a lot of social animals dp something like war. ringtail lemurs do. some mongoose species do. ofcourse lions do. hyena's as well. a lot of insects like wasps ( including ants and bees) and termites do as well. both interspecies and different species against each other. humans have just taken it to the next level.

    • @fluffysheap
      @fluffysheap 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@jamiecullum5567Obviously they read about it in the newspaper

  • @manuelwebe
    @manuelwebe 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent documentaries. Thoroughly documented and very well put together. Thanks for sharing.

  • @SorayaAzizSouleymane
    @SorayaAzizSouleymane 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Thank you so much for this masterpiece. How I wish we had lectures like these videos.
    I live just 15km from Lola ya bonobo in the DRC and I'd love to see an episode focusing more on them. ❤

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video just called you a monkey's nephew, and you think it was great? It's an insult. Every scrap of evidence used to support darwinism requires imagination, story telling, and assumption. Darwinism is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. It has a 0% success rate and a 100% fail rate. Therefore it fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. No scientist has observed the transition of one kind (taxonomic Family) to another kind (i.e. ape to man, wolf to whale, rat to bat, etc.). All we actually can observe is creatures always reproduce after their own kind, just like Genesis 1 says God created them to. So while observable biology refuses to validate darwinism daily, it obediently verifies scripture every moment of every day. That means people who reject scripture are denying observable science and documented history. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

  • @nem447
    @nem447 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I'm a naked ape and I'm fine with it. It's Ok not to have all the answers yet, we just have to live with that untill we do...

  • @0neIntangible
    @0neIntangible 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It began with art of play... grasping & picking up and playing with sticks, branches, leaves, grass, stalks, mud, pebbles, stones, rocks... and by playing with objects/toys/tools, learned striking, kicking, pounding, rolling and throwing stuff.

  • @scisher3294
    @scisher3294 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Also STILL mammals… and chordates… and Deuterostomes… and eukaryotes…

  • @Peekaboo-Kitty
    @Peekaboo-Kitty 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    They were not "Theories" at that time. They were Hypotheses.

  • @frankmalenfant2828
    @frankmalenfant2828 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    "Man in an ape... with car keys." - Capitaine Charles Patenaude, Romano-Fafard

  • @JustSomeGuyLV
    @JustSomeGuyLV 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    We are literally the modern apes, so yes we all have ape brain. That's not the bizarre or disgusting part. The disgusting part is that many humans refuse to use logic and rational reasoning over their instinctive violent behavior and their ignorant beliefs.

  • @antoniocricchio4814
    @antoniocricchio4814 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fascinating, interesting and incredibly well written and produced. Wow. For this, among the other high quality youtube docs, to be available with such ease is a real privilege. Vi auguro il meglio,
    Bravi

  • @charlesbrown1365
    @charlesbrown1365 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    We have primate brains ; we have mammal brains.

    • @johnharrison6745
      @johnharrison6745 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      THANK you. I was about to post a similar comment. The title of this video is "more awn Nick".

    • @ihatespam2
      @ihatespam2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We are mammal primates, so, that’s kind of a tautology.

    • @metal_pipe9764
      @metal_pipe9764 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We have fish brains

    • @ihatespam2
      @ihatespam2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@metal_pipe9764 we have fish brains, reptile brains, mammalian brains, and ape brains, if we’re lucky.

  • @sandramajeau2829
    @sandramajeau2829 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    We sure act likes animals sometimes 😊

    • @ihatespam2
      @ihatespam2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Animals do act like animals.

  • @peteg4957
    @peteg4957 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This was very well made, bravo

  • @R0GU351GN4L
    @R0GU351GN4L 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When you think about it, evolution is much more special than having been created as a design, we are the product of many random number generators essentially. If even one thing was different we would not exist at all.

  • @nikeisagreekgoddess4135
    @nikeisagreekgoddess4135 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    We really like to think we are more sophisticated than we really are. It's part of our biology to do so, just like we individually overestimate our attractiveness, intelligence, etc. It is a paradox that the very brains that gave us language and science, are the same that lie to us about self-perception.
    Unlike dogs and other animals, we may be able to identify ourselves when looking at mirror, but we are still incapable of being realistically self-aware.

    • @noncomplacent
      @noncomplacent 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I like how you just made everyone the same

  • @dominictarrsailing
    @dominictarrsailing 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I'm a huge fan of your History of... series. Interesting, and doesn't feel dumbed down like a lot of other science docs!

  • @Numba003
    @Numba003 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    A lot of this episode reminded me of my physical anthropology course in college. I quite enjoyed my anthropology courses. Thank you for another interesting episode!
    God be with you out there everybody. ✝️ :)

    • @jadenalmeida8592
      @jadenalmeida8592 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I assume your religious and you might be a Christian and you accept evil how do you put the talking snake and the Adam and Eve story with the evolutionary family tree

    • @Numba003
      @Numba003 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jadenalmeida8592 I am a Christian, and that is a fair question. Thank you for asking. I would like to caution you before I begin that much of the answers that follow are my personal opinions on the topic.
      Honestly, I think there are a few possible answers that would suffice regarding the literal happenings represented in the Genesis narrative. Without going into the details of those though, in general I think the Adam & Eve story is more "true" than "factual," if that makes sense, yet I don't see that fact as detracting from the truth of the Bible. To summarize, the first human beings were made by God and were innocent, but when tempted to do evil and rebel against God, they chose to do so. Afterward, their innocence was lost and they were no longer able to stand in God's presence and were doomed to experience pain, toil, and the eventuality of death.
      Having said this, I suspect this simple summary will not be comprehensive enough to answer your concerns in their entirety. As such, I would like to ask, where specifically do you see conflict between that narrative and natural history as we currently understand it? Also, please let me know if you would like me to go into any more detail as to any of my comments above. Thank you for taking the time to read this and respond. I look forward to your reply.

    • @jadenalmeida8592
      @jadenalmeida8592 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Numba003 well when I was 7 years when I was a religious catholic I believed that God put the soul in homo sapiens than in 2010 when I was 13 when savotee Pablo sequenced the neanderthal genes and found that Europeans and Asians had a bit of homo sapien genes I was frightened cause I am Indian there was a possibility of me having neanderthal genes I thought that if neanderthals I had neanderthal genes I dint have a soul and would not go to an after life but now I don't believe in a soul or anything . Just out of curiosity what do you believe that the common ancestor of neanderthals denisovans and homo sapiens had a soul or one of the homo sapiens only had a soul what do you believe

    • @OldSchoolKaki
      @OldSchoolKaki 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Numba003wow, this is such great vocab. Also, for some reason I read this with a Yorkshire accent 😭😭
      I'm really interested in where this conversation will follow.
      Perhaps, do you believe/think that the order within God created the Earth stated in the Bible, is factually incorrect?
      Like maybe Genesis isn't all that important when compared to the massage of all the other books in the bible. I haven't considered Genesis to be factual for years now, but rather I suspect it being an introduction to the Bible for beginners and Children/newer generations.
      To me, Genesis seems to be, as stated above, a story made to grasp the idea of the Lord and his all mightyness, rather than to be factual.
      As far as I'm aware, complex civilisations only started around 12 000 years ago, giving enough time for the language, Hebrew to develop. Some place in the Bible I vividly remember the names of all the generations linking King David to Jesus, and Abraham. But even all those names on that list don't exceed 12 000 years, which leads me to believe that Abrahamic religions are relatively new compared to any religions prior to the ice age.
      Let me know what you think, and thanks for reading ❤

    • @Numba003
      @Numba003 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jadenalmeida8592 Hello friend. First off, thank you for your polite reply. Regarding the exact nature of the soul, human evolution, and prehistory, I am sorry to say that I do not actually have much of an opinion because I feel as though I have very little to no information beyond speculation upon which to base such an opinion. I believe that we human beings are ourselves souls which have the bodies we do. At present, I think at some point in the past God made our earliest ancestors this way and endowed them with this quality of soul (which is where I think a lot of if not all of the meaning in "created in God's image" comes from), though when or the specifics of that are open to speculation. I have no opinion because I do not think I have any reliable way of knowing that beyond speculation, and I do not feel qualified to speculate on such things. I'm sorry if this reply is disappointing. Thank you for taking the time to read it, and I look forward to your next reply.

  • @joshuawhite9268
    @joshuawhite9268 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've been scrolling videos for past 3 hours , not knowing what I was even looking for , trusting I know when it decided to scroll past.
    Found it!

  • @elitecol69
    @elitecol69 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Please release these as podcasts like the history of the universe!

  • @bonkus4073
    @bonkus4073 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    evolution deniers : 😭

    • @thomaspaine7098
      @thomaspaine7098 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They really can’t accept that they’re not special

    • @Mr.Hazama-YuukiTerumi
      @Mr.Hazama-YuukiTerumi 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Me seeing "evolutionist and creationists fighting over something so trivial": 🍿

  • @Overlorddz
    @Overlorddz 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I always think the supreme qualities humans tend to value themselves on compared to any other animal is literally the most animalistic and predatory trait we have. By elevating our species above the enemy rich kingdom we not only protect and prolong ourselves but we also have a safe distance at which to kill the other species. The fact it's ridiculous to many people to consider not eating meat or including animal rights in law enforcement is very strange considering the favours we do our own. Fascinating video!

    • @Jack_Torrance.
      @Jack_Torrance. 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is their choice not to eat meat. The problem comes when they start demanding everyone else do as well. The environmental wack jobs are now insisting there be no meat in human diets to slow global warming. On the other side, there are 16,000 scientists that have signed a study that states there has been no more climate change than there has been since the, "Little Ice Age." But, that gives no more power to the wealthy-elite, nor is there money to be made with that finding. Thus, few hear about it. I will eat vegetables and meat as long as I want to. No environmental freak will stop me. I am going hunting this weekend, in a diesel vehicle.

    • @corylwillrise
      @corylwillrise 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      God elevated man above the animals for a reason: because the animals cannot choose to love the Creator God. The premise of your belief is to worship the creature over the Creator. This is the root cause of your convoluted belief in equity among the species.

    • @noncomplacent
      @noncomplacent 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Obviously there's a difference between humans and animals and we notice and value that. Never seen a gorilla do open heart surgery. We don't have to be animalistic to notice that.
      There are plenty of people who think the way you do about meat, animal rights, etc. Animals have no concept of rights at all.
      People are supposed to choose civility over animal instincts. It's sad that you have to make this comment because so many people act like animals.

  • @GeorgeHagstrom
    @GeorgeHagstrom 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You know what they call a canopy evolved creature driven onto the ground? Lunch.

  • @terranbiped8358
    @terranbiped8358 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The title had me wary because of the plethora of pseudo science junk that inhabits TH-cam but I was pleasantly surprised at the well presented, factual and comprehensive presentation that hit all the necessary benchmarks in the allotted time. A great primer and refresher for the interested layman.
    In the beginning there was the wet ware neuron. A most amazing interactive biological structure that led to us. Now there is the binary digital program, the dry ware, that is leading towards GAI. As Dawkins would say, our extended phenotype. We live in interesting times.