so for exmaple if its asking if further intervention in a market is neccary but intevtion is already taking place should my FOR points focus on e.g a higher subisdy not just a subsidy?
I would but examiner would most likely accept subsidy in general but to show higher level of evaluation and analysis, it would be stronger to consider a pre-existing subsidy.
hi, I wonder in paper 3, is it acceptable to like, take a few phrases from the paragraphs from extracts as my application in the 25 marker, instead of using the main opinions expressed in those extracts? For example, if extract A talks about subsidies being useless in a sector, can I still argue for it in a paragraph, but later use the lines in extract A to evaluate it? Or maybe, my entire point is simply based on one very small sentence in the extract, is that ok?
Yes, sounds absolutely fine. But let’s say it suggests subsidies are useless, you would have to consider why they’re intervening with subsidies in the first place! That will be your main analytical argument and then you can use the phrase about it being useless as your counter, evaluative point!
I am so grateful to you for this video! Absolute masterpiece! You are going to may great places. Thank you for this ❤
bit late to be finding this vid the morning of but wow its absolutely amazing. so helpful and will be using tips from this :)
absolutely quality video mate
so for exmaple if its asking if further intervention in a market is neccary but intevtion is already taking place should my FOR points focus on e.g a higher subisdy not just a subsidy?
I would but examiner would most likely accept subsidy in general but to show higher level of evaluation and analysis, it would be stronger to consider a pre-existing subsidy.
hi, I wonder in paper 3, is it acceptable to like, take a few phrases from the paragraphs from extracts as my application in the 25 marker, instead of using the main opinions expressed in those extracts?
For example, if extract A talks about subsidies being useless in a sector, can I still argue for it in a paragraph, but later use the lines in extract A to evaluate it?
Or maybe, my entire point is simply based on one very small sentence in the extract, is that ok?
Yes, sounds absolutely fine. But let’s say it suggests subsidies are useless, you would have to consider why they’re intervening with subsidies in the first place! That will be your main analytical argument and then you can use the phrase about it being useless as your counter, evaluative point!
*many