It's very simple. Democrats see an advantage to be seen "fighting for" all these issues but never actually "succeeding". Succeeding means they can't fundraise off the issue in the future. But voters aren't stupid. Democrats think people ARE stupid, and this makes us ANGRY.
I told my wife that the Trump insurrection trials were fake. They never intended to put Trump in prison, it was four years of waste of time! yet, the 1/6 rioters were sentenced and put in prison. Trump didn't even get a trial on it! why did democrats do this? well to please the democrat base! also, If Trump went to prison, democrats fear their next democrat president will end up in prison for payback. It was all a scam trial to please the democrat base! all democrat talk no action!
Are you under the impression that Trump is not working specifically to benefit corporate interests at the expense of the American people? Musk literally bought his way into the White House and acts like he owns the place
The Democratic Party would rather lose with their preferred candidate than cede power to progressives and win. I’m not voting for harm reduction anymore. It didn’t work this time so I’m not supporting a broken party anymore.
Would you vote for everyone to get a million dollars, how about 100 dollars and hr minimum wage, what about 4 months vacation, or 150k a year at 62. Democrats do this over and over again. They act like cost doesn't matter, like we can print any amount of money and it will have no effect on the economy. Polling doesn't mean you should do it. Or that the country can afford it. You can tax every Billionaire at 100% and you could not pay for all the give aways Democrats would love to have. Also, corporations do not pay taxes, they pass it on to consumers. Stop believing these lies. You are entitled to anything, except opportunity and in the US you have that. Why do you think so my migrants come here and start businesses. I have owned franchises and we had migrants in every class to learn how to operate.
I don't consider abortion, min wage, or sick leave "progressive" issues. They seem like normal liberal issues. Also, voters rejected democrats bc most recently democrats have made all these grand promises and not delivered.
@mapleknot3 not even liberal issues... just human issues. I may vote for the right, but I still believe women have a right to choose. The problem is we only got to pick from two candidates.
They are not exclusively the issues of any one group. Both progressives and liberals support these things, as do many conservatives as well. The problem is that both major parties are heavily corrupted by big donor money, and things like paid family leave and a higher minimum wage would cost the donors a lot of money.... which they hate.
Somehow he can squeeze money out of rocks to fund wars and weapons though. I swear presidents are just salespeople and lobbyist for weapon manufacturers
"I Didn't Leave the Democratic Party...the Democratic Party Left me" Never has this Statement been more true...some will admit it and some will not, but we ALL know it.
The DP has long been a right wing party. When Bill Clinton took over they rebranded to "the New Dems", basically taking the Republican strategy of catering to the major lobbies, and the rest is history
@@roscojenkins7451 Young men were chased out of the party in 2016 as a means keeping Bernie away from a general election. The donor class couldn't allow real change.
It’s puzzling that they keep running such bad candidates. If Tulsi Gabbard had been the candidate I believe she would be the incoming president. Sadly she’s too anti-war to be a Democrat these days.
Progressive policies are open borders, open racial discrimination, transitioning kids and investing in failed institutions. Only progressive mental deficients support these policies.
We didn’t even have a democratic primary. Y’all just chose Biden and then when you realized he’s cooked in the head you chose Harris. Nobody wanted either of those clowns.
They appointed the last 3 presidential candidates, this last time they were so bold about it they didn’t even bother with the primary. I don’t know how they expect anyone to believe that they want to protect democracy.
@@richardhay645 now extend that logic to its rational conclusion that the other party does the same exact thing and only we the people can save ourselves. No billionaire
@payleryder45 Obamacare isn’t perfect, but it did give access to 60 million Americans on healthcare with preexisting conditions protections and Medicaid expansion.
@@pjpatronPeople already had "access" to healthcare via Medicaid, charity care and emergency rooms. Obamacare required below-market coverage of the uninsured AT THE EXPENSE of everyone else who had insurance. It also required coverage for high cost nonsense like trans therapy/drugs/surgeries. Obamacare made insurance more expensive and incentivized insurers to deny more claims in order to cover costs for the free riders. It was a disaster.
@@justinb2630 clearly that is not going to happen, or they would be bigger than they are by now. There has not been a time in my lifetime that more people have been so discontent with the duopoly or more open to a third party. Now is the time for an actual viable new third party.
Bingo. When I was a kid I remember listening to a House Representative talk about how they were going to "fix" the illegal immigration problem. Decades and decades later that politician is still in office talking about how they will fix the problem. Her name is Nancy Pelosi.
Democrats did not discuss issues..the focus on racism, hitler, fascist, name, calling…not economic issues."or any plan that makes sense..price checking in grocery stores…really
That's the controlled opposition party for you. Democrats don't want to fix things because that stops their donor money. Democrats are just Republicans with a blue tie
It’s the pivot that Hillary Clinton tried when she was running against Trump and the Democrat party never figured out that it was a bad tactic. Probably because Hillary herself couldn’t admit she messed up.
I think a lot of it boils down to - nothing would fundamentally change under Harris. How useful is a stick of beef jerky on a sinking ship? Not that Trump's policies will do anything to help, it's just seen as more of a wild card.
YELP, SO TRUE --- PEOPLE VOTE ON VIBES NOT POLICIES ---- A SURVEY FOUND THAT VOTERS LIKED HARRIS POLICIES WHEN TOLD ABOUT THEM BUT THE SAME VOTERS, MANY OF THEM SAID THEY WERE VOTING TRUMP ---
It's amazing at what could be done if we stopped these wars, or supporting other countries. Instead, we're taxes more than most European countries but have nothing to show for it
It's because our tax money funds the European lifestyle. Something ridiculous like >10% of Germany's entire GDP is due to the US "defense" spending with all our military bases on their lands.
Hilarious that trump claimed in his threats to invade Canada that we would pay less tax…. We don’t pay that much more than you but we actually have benefits including 18 months paid parental leave and medical….
What's really ironic is had the Dem ticket been reversed with Harris as the VP again and Walz as the candidate, he would have won. His approval rate was higher than both Trump and Harris towards the very end as he had the same appeal to may of the folks who voted for Trump as Sanders did in 2016. I think he actually had a net positive rating here in Georgia going into the election. I genuienl believe if Harris would have made more of an attempt to disconnect her campaign from Biden's administration and at least appealed a little more to the base instead of Republicans who ended up voting for Trump anyway she would have done better.
@@thedelapo1606 I don't think sexism played a decisive factor in it actually. Her being tied to the administration and parading Liz around are really what did her in. It suppressed the base voter turnout in too many areas. It was a dumb maneuver for her to do given the circumstances of the political environment we're in. I don't think Walz or some other nonstandard Democrat would have done it, and it's pretty obvious with how badly Walz struggled to defend it when he was directly pushed on it by Jon Stewart.
Supporting progressive policies and actually making them happen are 2 different things. Obama supported making Abortion a protected right but when he had the chance, he said fuck yall. The choice was between Trump, who had the power to get his vision across, and Kamala who was just full of empty promises and word salad.
This guy is not very smart. 1-Abortion is legal one way or the other in majority of states-Not a general election issue. --2-to have sick leave or minimum wage, you need a job first!! That's why people voted Trump.
For some reason, these political analysts often lean heavily liberal and tend to be consistently off the mark in their political analysis, election projections, and related commentary. Saying they are unreliable would be putting it mildly.
What if you also tell them that, in some cases, the alternative is to hope like hell you never slip up and fall of the capitalist treadmill or you'll end up on the street?
Does Sagar have any friends on this channel? All these additional channels are left of center. We were supposed to get both sides of the political aisle
Find a right of center channel that critiques the ruling class and capital… we will wait. You won’t, because conservatism ideologically aligns with the ruling class. Of course, you’d have to turn off the color TV and read a book to realize that. I would recommend Thomas Paine’s ‘Rights of Man’, but I doubt you possess the reading comprehension, or the internal constitution, to make it through the first 10 pages.
Find a right of center channel that critiques the ruling class and capital… we will wait. You won’t, because conservatism ideologically aligns with the ruling class. Of course, you’d have to turn off the color TV and read a book to realize that. I would recommend Thomas Paine’s ‘Rights of Man’, but I doubt you possess the reading comprehension, or the internal constitution, to make it through the first 10 pages.
I marked this video as a 75% truth. Because he missed some clear things. Such as the fact that in my state of California voters have rejected progressive crime policies, two progressives DA's were ousted, more citizens are taking a get-tough approach to homelessness & drug addicts, mayors who have been considered part of the problems as either being too progressive or inept have been removed. Also, it was a multiracial working class that came out to vote more and overtook the college-educated middle to upper class mostly white progressive left voters who are out of touch with the average citizen and their wants and desires at the ballot box. In Los Angeles County, former SF, DA and former SF Police Chief turned L.A. DA Greg Garson was voted out in favor of Republican Nathan Hochman. In Alameda County (where Oakland and Berkeley are), DA Pamala Price was successfully recalled. Proposition 36 passed as a statewide referendum to re-increases penalties for certain theft and drug crimes which reversed the previous state referendum. Mind you that Democratic-super majority in both houses of the state legislature were trying to thwart the will of the people before we could have a vote on Prop 36 and are mad that the majority of the voters got our way. The Mayor of San Fransico London Breed was ousted as an ineffective mayor. The Mayor of Oakland Sheng Thao was successfully recalled in part due to her ineptness, progressive, economic & crime ideas and having been raided by the feds. th-cam.com/video/Rx0cBIR49LY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=pzMdK6rhi2Vr3DlJ
It’s simple, people love the policies of progresses, but I hate the candidates because they’re too extreme socially and how close the democrats became when it comes to being corporate friendly. Yes, Republicans are also just as corporate friendly, but when it comes to social issues, they understand that reality and there’s also one more thing, Republicans are more honest about what they hate than Democrats. The Republicans are more on this about their hatred towards the working class than the Democrats, Republicans are more honest on the hatred of minorities Democrats, and Republicans don’t need to Pender and pretend they care about minority groups like how Democrats love to do. It’s simple Republicans are more honest about the heat trade it towards the working class than Democrats and Elise. When you come to Republicans, you know you’re gonna get screwed over than Democrats. Democrats simply lie through their teeth all the time and never tell the truth and that is why the Democrats lose. The Democrats lost because of the constant pandering, lies, poor management, when it comes to real issues, and their willingness to abandon the working class when they need them the most. I love you both parties as a seam, and the only difference between Democrats and Republicans is one pretends to care while the other is open on their hatred towards the working class. Who do you think is more likely to win, the liar, who hates the working class, but panders to the culturally extreme or The party is more honest about their hatred towards the working class, but understands the cultural norms that people care about.
The US Constitution provides only for "the general welfare", like roads and bridges, not government charity to individuals like the almost 100 federal redistribution programs already confiscating money earned by taxpayers. Amending the Federal Constitution is very difficult. State citizens can more easily change their state constitutions to expand their states powers to create government charity welfare states, including "healthcare access" programs. As long as the states have balanced budget laws each state will have realistic limits to curb state politicians pandering to buy votes. Of course, the federal government should not provide money to states that are incapable of governing themselves to pass balanced budgets. The federal government could then reduce federal taxes and let the individual states raise their taxes to continue previously federally funded individual charity welfare programs bringing governments closer to the people they serve. Only by abiding by the Constitution can democracy and our republic be preserved.
What percent of the nation are all of these: 1. Pro-abortion 2. Women 3. Child bearing age 4. Living in a state where abortions are limited The answer is less than 2% of the countey fit into all of these categories. That's why it's not the voting priority that people say it is. The people who want abortions already live in states where it's readily available.
Neither candidate of either political party represents the American people... So why would u think you made a good decision? Also... Our vote didn't and doesn't matter since the electoral college chooses
"the other candidate" did NOT support those things. They just SAID IT in public.. didn't do a DAMN THING for me the last 4 years. 27 seconds into this video and I'm already ready to go
It’s shocking how little people who cover politics understand politics. They think Americans vote for president based on their policies. Despite the mountain of evidence every election cycle, like this, that they do not.
The average person isnt mature enough to vote on issues, they vote on vibes. Thats how someone like Rogan become a MAGA cheerleader despite also loving Bernie. These arent serious people.
Bernie was always a clown and was finally exposed. Joe is far from a MAGA cheerleader. He voted for Trump because the Dems are insane and Tulsi and Bobby.
Rogan's biggest issue was "I hate censorship." Interesting how that was branded MAGA by the media as they keep pushing for centralized control over "misinformation"
Everyone that thinks Republicans aren't equally accountable to voters needs to leave the discussion. The asymmetry in expectation is staggering. We're trying to create a representative government here, and we can't do that if the party actually running the government isn't expected to be representative.
I live in Alaska. we vote for these things once a state level. We don't need a federal level sick leave because we took care of it on our own. State level laws work just fine without a federal version. This holds true for minimum wage laws and abortions as well.
I don't think very many people at all voted for abortion to be a Constitutional right. For one, it isn't. Period. Get over it. Two, it very much is a STATE right and that's what people voted. Those who voted for abortion in their state but also voted for Trump made that abundantly clear.
The Democratic party is the rich donor party, they have long abandoned the working class. Trying to convince them to be who we want them to be is an exercise in futility. We've been through this song and dance soo many times. At what point does repeating the same action and expecting different results become recognized for the insanity that it is?
Well, let's see how America does with an Oligarchy, instead I guess. Anyone voting for Trump because they thought he'd "drain the swamp", we're just getting a different kind of swamp.
I lived in Florida until recently. That 60% rule isn't all bad, back in 2018 there was a poorly worded ballot measure backed by all the major power companies that would've ended cash back incentives for solar power. Gore himself came down to campaign against it but because the wording sounded positive many were fooled into voting for it anyways but it failed to reach 60%.
If you wanna have a relationship, you share your health issues and you make them as a team. You don’t wanna follow these rules and you wanna complain. Stay out of it then.
This is dishonest. Most people are in favor of free money, but not in favor of lower wages in exchange for sick leave, which is the practical outcome of this policy
Conservatives can play this stupid game too; the overwhelming majority of Americans support mass deportations, tough-on-crime policy and would vote to eliminate income tax (at least in their own tax bracket) if they could. Ergo; Americans support CONSERVATIVE policy.
You missed the point of your entire video. We live in a Republic. State's most Republicans understand this. We want the state to have more power than the federal government. Each state should decide what their policies are, not the federal government deciding for everybody.
If you’re talking the right to an appointment and half the bill covered your half as the female that you would cover alongside the male you work with and make the decision equally as a team. Sure, they are plenty of males and females that would be happy to get on board.
spreading that abortion misinformation again. the supreme court decision was not on whether abortion should be legal or illegal. only about whether it was a state or federal issue based on the roe v wade case. the justices decided correctly. from a purely legal perspective. and obviously it being a state issue, which trump has affirmed, means that people can vote for it on a state level. not at all weird that people would vote that way. you also have to be very specific when talking about "abortion rights" since it covers A LOT of ground. technically allowing abortions in cases where both mother and child would otherwise die is abortion rights. so is abortions at will up to the fetus being viable outside the womb with no restrictions and no need for medical consultation. at yet these are obviously not the same. grouping everything together here is misleading as hell.
When I hear Americans criticizing the Democratic Party, it is almost always about politics and the word socialism. So, if democrats get off of that distracting junk, they'll be able to win enough elections to pass much more serious reform to improve the lot of the lower middle classes. The American public does deserve a lot of blame here because they don't notice when democrats due an act, policy that benefits them or when republicans and act policy that hurts them. Americans for the most part barely pay attention to what's going on in terms of policy and democrats really have to win enough elections to pass very dramatic reforms like medicare for all for them to notice.
Democrats offer a lot of aesthetics without substance Trump said he'd blow sh*t up and people took a chance that maybe something good might come out of that mess
These are not federal issues.States can decide what’s their minimum wage.It cost more to live in New York than Nebraska.Probably should read the10th Amendment again to get a proper perspective.
It's very simple. Democrats see an advantage to be seen "fighting for" all these issues but never actually "succeeding". Succeeding means they can't fundraise off the issue in the future. But voters aren't stupid. Democrats think people ARE stupid, and this makes us ANGRY.
Amen!
They did succeeded.
spot on
I told my wife that the Trump insurrection trials were fake. They never intended to put Trump in prison, it was four years of waste of time! yet, the 1/6 rioters were sentenced and put in prison. Trump didn't even get a trial on it! why did democrats do this? well to please the democrat base! also, If Trump went to prison, democrats fear their next democrat president will end up in prison for payback. It was all a scam trial to please the democrat base! all democrat talk no action!
Democrats made the election about abortion and immigration.
That is why I voted for Trump.
Corporate controlled candidates will never be for the people. Never.
Do you think sometimes they could be for the people?
Yeah!! Just Israel controlled ones!
Both of our options were corporate controlled
Are you under the impression that Trump is not working specifically to benefit corporate interests at the expense of the American people? Musk literally bought his way into the White House and acts like he owns the place
@@chasd9504 Please name the corporations which "controlled" Mr. Trump.
The Democratic Party would rather lose with their preferred candidate than cede power to progressives and win.
I’m not voting for harm reduction anymore. It didn’t work this time so I’m not supporting a broken party anymore.
💯
Would you vote for everyone to get a million dollars, how about 100 dollars and hr minimum wage, what about 4 months vacation, or 150k a year at 62. Democrats do this over and over again. They act like cost doesn't matter, like we can print any amount of money and it will have no effect on the economy. Polling doesn't mean you should do it. Or that the country can afford it. You can tax every Billionaire at 100% and you could not pay for all the give aways Democrats would love to have. Also, corporations do not pay taxes, they pass it on to consumers. Stop believing these lies. You are entitled to anything, except opportunity and in the US you have that. Why do you think so my migrants come here and start businesses. I have owned franchises and we had migrants in every class to learn how to operate.
@@crogers4912go somewhere else with that "financial responsibility for thee, but not for me bs" and yeah we can afford it
@@crogers4912 Exactly. The COVID payments were popular when they were made. The rapid and extreme inflation that they caused was not popular.
^ exactly this. Republicans didn’t win, democrats lost.
I don't consider abortion, min wage, or sick leave "progressive" issues. They seem like normal liberal issues.
Also, voters rejected democrats bc most recently democrats have made all these grand promises and not delivered.
@mapleknot3 not even liberal issues... just human issues. I may vote for the right, but I still believe women have a right to choose. The problem is we only got to pick from two candidates.
Tbh most all American left economic positions are actually moderate positions. America is an anomaly when it comes to things like healthcare.
What the word liberal means has changed. They are what we used to call moderates. And moderates compromise with right even when they don’t have to.
They are not exclusively the issues of any one group. Both progressives and liberals support these things, as do many conservatives as well. The problem is that both major parties are heavily corrupted by big donor money, and things like paid family leave and a higher minimum wage would cost the donors a lot of money.... which they hate.
I would not call these issues "liberal." Today's liberals are pro war, pro corporate, anti labor, etc. They're not much different from neo-cons.
Remember a few months ago when Biden was telling everybody what he will do if reelected like he couldn't do those things right now?
"Listen fat"
Somehow he can squeeze money out of rocks to fund wars and weapons though. I swear presidents are just salespeople and lobbyist for weapon manufacturers
But "we finally beat Medicare"!
"I Didn't Leave the Democratic Party...the Democratic Party Left me"
Never has this Statement been more true...some will admit it and some will not, but we ALL know it.
More like they RIGHT you... Cuz many didn't even have to move left to not coincide with the Democratic party anymore....
This is an oligarchy
@@roscojenkins7451 Today's DEM party is a mixture of Extreme Left-wing ideology and Corrupt Corporate backing. They are sadly totally lost today...
The DP has long been a right wing party. When Bill Clinton took over they rebranded to "the New Dems", basically taking the Republican strategy of catering to the major lobbies, and the rest is history
@@roscojenkins7451 Young men were chased out of the party in 2016 as a means keeping Bernie away from a general election. The donor class couldn't allow real change.
We rejected her because shes a terrible propped up candidate.
It’s puzzling that they keep running such bad candidates. If Tulsi Gabbard had been the candidate I believe she would be the incoming president. Sadly she’s too anti-war to be a Democrat these days.
Progressive policies are open borders, open racial discrimination, transitioning kids and investing in failed institutions. Only progressive mental deficients support these policies.
Democrats are Yt supremacists too.
You display a shameful lack of racism and sexism.
And Trump was preferable? I wasn’t terribly happy with any of this but I still wasn’t ready to shoot myself in the foot to prove a point.
We didn’t even have a democratic primary. Y’all just chose Biden and then when you realized he’s cooked in the head you chose Harris. Nobody wanted either of those clowns.
"whwn you realized you couldn't fool anybody with how cooked Biden was in the head"
They appointed the last 3 presidential candidates, this last time they were so bold about it they didn’t even bother with the primary. I don’t know how they expect anyone to believe that they want to protect democracy.
Republicans got to pick the candidate they wanted, democrats didn't
I'm left leaning. The Democratic party simply doesn't represent me. We need a new party, plain and simple.
Democrat politicians promise BUT ALMOST NEVER DELIVER.
@@richardhay645 now extend that logic to its rational conclusion that the other party does the same exact thing and only we the people can save ourselves. No billionaire
They deliver all the time. But people like Krystal lie to you and say they don't because people like Krystal are actually right wing fascist
Democrats delivered Obamacare and the American healthcare system has been excellent ever since. Dude, get out a little.
@payleryder45 Obamacare isn’t perfect, but it did give access to 60 million Americans on healthcare with preexisting conditions protections and Medicaid expansion.
@@pjpatronPeople already had "access" to healthcare via Medicaid, charity care and emergency rooms. Obamacare required below-market coverage of the uninsured AT THE EXPENSE of everyone else who had insurance. It also required coverage for high cost nonsense like trans therapy/drugs/surgeries. Obamacare made insurance more expensive and incentivized insurers to deny more claims in order to cover costs for the free riders. It was a disaster.
Policies, not candidates, are what matter
Yeah flood the border, give handouts to everyone, and trans the kids. Amazing policy
You're assuming most people in the this country aren't complete idiots
Policy towards Israel is a problem in both parties.
This is the US; vibes are what matter
I will certainly ask the candidate if they unconditionally support Israel. I did not expect a Democrat to support a genocidal regime.
Exactly! We need an actual Progressive Party.
Would only be successful if they drop the everything is racist and gender games people.
lol epic fail.
Green Party is the party that everyone should get on board with.
@@SoCalFof if they drop the crazy parts the party has a chance. But if they keep all the nonsense from the last 8 years then no chance
@@justinb2630 clearly that is not going to happen, or they would be bigger than they are by now. There has not been a time in my lifetime that more people have been so discontent with the duopoly or more open to a third party. Now is the time for an actual viable new third party.
Democrats promise, but never deliver. Never.
One of the reasons I enjoy breaking points is because they offer both perspective. This is not that.
Democrats talk about it but will never act on it.
Fr, after the parliamentarian trick for minimum wage, I knew we were getting nothing.
@@DiscordBeing
I knew we weren’t getting anything after he lied about the $2k checks
@WeArlett they did send out 1,400$ checks. But that was because they already sent out 600$ checks in 2020.
Bingo. When I was a kid I remember listening to a House Representative talk about how they were going to "fix" the illegal immigration problem. Decades and decades later that politician is still in office talking about how they will fix the problem. Her name is Nancy Pelosi.
It's not your policies, it's you.
Nobody should be surprised they were rejected
Harris would have never increased minimum wage.
A tax YOU pay is called a “fair tax”.
A tax I pay is called an “unfair tax”.
Cons coping over progressive policies being popular in 3… 2… 1…
Robbing petter to pay Paul, will always be popular with Paul
Its easy democrats promise things and never deliver. They get punished for not delivering.
Did Vox make this for BP? 😂
this guy has huge soy energy
The propaganda is strong with this one…
4:46 I especially like how this guy cut the very important “BUT”
Democrats did not discuss issues..the focus on racism, hitler, fascist, name, calling…not economic issues."or any plan that makes sense..price checking in grocery stores…really
Reason grocery prices …will sort itself out IE in a major grocery store milk for 1/2 gallon milk 2.29 at Aldi 1.25 Eggs 5.00 vs 3.02 etc
That's the controlled opposition party for you. Democrats don't want to fix things because that stops their donor money. Democrats are just Republicans with a blue tie
It’s the pivot that Hillary Clinton tried when she was running against Trump and the Democrat party never figured out that it was a bad tactic. Probably because Hillary herself couldn’t admit she messed up.
I think a lot of it boils down to - nothing would fundamentally change under Harris. How useful is a stick of beef jerky on a sinking ship?
Not that Trump's policies will do anything to help, it's just seen as more of a wild card.
The majority of the electorate is stupid and vote on vibes not policies.
Kyle stan: detected
YELP, SO TRUE --- PEOPLE VOTE ON VIBES NOT POLICIES ---- A SURVEY FOUND THAT VOTERS LIKED HARRIS POLICIES WHEN TOLD ABOUT THEM BUT THE SAME VOTERS, MANY OF THEM SAID THEY WERE VOTING TRUMP ---
It's amazing at what could be done if we stopped these wars, or supporting other countries. Instead, we're taxes more than most European countries but have nothing to show for it
It's because our tax money funds the European lifestyle. Something ridiculous like >10% of Germany's entire GDP is due to the US "defense" spending with all our military bases on their lands.
Hilarious that trump claimed in his threats to invade Canada that we would pay less tax…. We don’t pay that much more than you but we actually have benefits including 18 months paid parental leave and medical….
That’s because America is a corporation. Don’t know why more don’t understand this
What's really ironic is had the Dem ticket been reversed with Harris as the VP again and Walz as the candidate, he would have won. His approval rate was higher than both Trump and Harris towards the very end as he had the same appeal to may of the folks who voted for Trump as Sanders did in 2016. I think he actually had a net positive rating here in Georgia going into the election. I genuienl believe if Harris would have made more of an attempt to disconnect her campaign from Biden's administration and at least appealed a little more to the base instead of Republicans who ended up voting for Trump anyway she would have done better.
lol stop drinking both of them are lunatics. He wasn't winning anything
If the ticket was reversed with Walz at the top, Trump would've won every single state.
😂 you're so delusional. Let me guess it was just sexism😂😂😂😂
@@thedelapo1606 I don't think sexism played a decisive factor in it actually. Her being tied to the administration and parading Liz around are really what did her in. It suppressed the base voter turnout in too many areas. It was a dumb maneuver for her to do given the circumstances of the political environment we're in. I don't think Walz or some other nonstandard Democrat would have done it, and it's pretty obvious with how badly Walz struggled to defend it when he was directly pushed on it by Jon Stewart.
I like how you cut off the JD Vance quote before he reiterates that it should be a states rights issue.
Supporting progressive policies and actually making them happen are 2 different things. Obama supported making Abortion a protected right but when he had the chance, he said fuck yall. The choice was between Trump, who had the power to get his vision across, and Kamala who was just full of empty promises and word salad.
This guy is not very smart. 1-Abortion is legal one way or the other in majority of states-Not a general election issue. --2-to have sick leave or minimum wage, you need a job first!! That's why people voted Trump.
This video is peak delusion
For some reason, these political analysts often lean heavily liberal and tend to be consistently off the mark in their political analysis, election projections, and related commentary. Saying they are unreliable would be putting it mildly.
What the heck is this Vox lite?
They seem to have employed the same editing/production team - not to mention the writing..
Might as well just title the video "We lost, now we cry."
If you ask anyone generic questions about providing benefits, they will say "Yes".
...but nothing is FREE!
What if you also tell them that, in some cases, the alternative is to hope like hell you never slip up and fall of the capitalist treadmill or you'll end up on the street?
@@Introverted100 I would like to visit this capitalism treadmill. Can you provide an address?
Exactly. Wishful thinking. Corporate tax will pay for everything.😂
I think you can afford to send a few billion less for war and give your people some benefits?
Sean O'Brien w/ T.Carlson - Teamsters President reveals Kamala Harris last words "I'll Win with or without You"
Everyone should listen to that podcast...
*LMFAO!!!* 😆😅😂🤣
@@mboiko👈👈👈👈 "You better get on board." ~ QUE MALA LA LA LA 🥥 🌴🍹
@@RichardKing-sx6xc Yup, or else..."I'll will without you."
I would make the language a little less academic so this video is accessible to most people, rather than the Breaking Points audience.
It became obvious that Biden was not running the show , so why put in another person who will be doing the same.
Policies are popular until you ask them about the higher taxes needed to fund them
Shocking that people weren’t persuaded by a koala
Does Sagar have any friends on this channel? All these additional channels are left of center.
We were supposed to get both sides of the political aisle
Find a right of center channel that critiques the ruling class and capital… we will wait. You won’t, because conservatism ideologically aligns with the ruling class. Of course, you’d have to turn off the color TV and read a book to realize that. I would recommend Thomas Paine’s ‘Rights of Man’, but I doubt you possess the reading comprehension, or the internal constitution, to make it through the first 10 pages.
Find a right of center channel that critiques the ruling class and capital… we will wait. You won’t, because conservatism ideologically aligns with the ruling class. Of course, you’d have to turn off the color TV and read a book to realize that. I would recommend Thomas Paine’s ‘Rights of Man’, but I doubt you possess the reading comprehension, or the internal constitution, to make it through the first 10 pages.
@@Gobbldeegoo1 Of course - Tucker Carlson, friend and admirer of the Ruling Class.
I thought sagar became a lefty?
I marked this video as a 75% truth. Because he missed some clear things. Such as the fact that in my state of California voters have rejected progressive crime policies, two progressives DA's were ousted, more citizens are taking a get-tough approach to homelessness & drug addicts, mayors who have been considered part of the problems as either being too progressive or inept have been removed.
Also, it was a multiracial working class that came out to vote more and overtook the college-educated middle to upper class mostly white progressive left voters who are out of touch with the average citizen and their wants and desires at the ballot box.
In Los Angeles County, former SF, DA and former SF Police Chief turned L.A. DA Greg Garson was voted out in favor of Republican Nathan Hochman.
In Alameda County (where Oakland and Berkeley are), DA Pamala Price was successfully recalled.
Proposition 36 passed as a statewide referendum to re-increases penalties for certain theft and drug crimes which reversed the previous state referendum. Mind you that Democratic-super majority in both houses of the state legislature were trying to thwart the will of the people before we could have a vote on Prop 36 and are mad that the majority of the voters got our way.
The Mayor of San Fransico London Breed was ousted as an ineffective mayor.
The Mayor of Oakland Sheng Thao was successfully recalled in part due to her ineptness, progressive, economic & crime ideas and having been raided by the feds.
th-cam.com/video/Rx0cBIR49LY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=pzMdK6rhi2Vr3DlJ
What’s funny is that these people think voters can’t make these kinds of calculations.
Some didn’t vote at all! Seeing both sides as not serving the public needs!
This kids, is what we in the business like to call propaganda.
It’s simple, people love the policies of progresses, but I hate the candidates because they’re too extreme socially and how close the democrats became when it comes to being corporate friendly. Yes, Republicans are also just as corporate friendly, but when it comes to social issues, they understand that reality and there’s also one more thing, Republicans are more honest about what they hate than Democrats. The Republicans are more on this about their hatred towards the working class than the Democrats, Republicans are more honest on the hatred of minorities Democrats, and Republicans don’t need to Pender and pretend they care about minority groups like how Democrats love to do. It’s simple Republicans are more honest about the heat trade it towards the working class than Democrats and Elise. When you come to Republicans, you know you’re gonna get screwed over than Democrats. Democrats simply lie through their teeth all the time and never tell the truth and that is why the Democrats lose. The Democrats lost because of the constant pandering, lies, poor management, when it comes to real issues, and their willingness to abandon the working class when they need them the most. I love you both parties as a seam, and the only difference between Democrats and Republicans is one pretends to care while the other is open on their hatred towards the working class. Who do you think is more likely to win, the liar, who hates the working class, but panders to the culturally extreme or The party is more honest about their hatred towards the working class, but understands the cultural norms that people care about.
NO voters rejected both.
LoL con coping
Wrong. Progressive policies like raising wages won in red county's.
Then why did voters vote for left-wing policies at the same time as right-wing candidates?
atleast trump is saying the quiet part out lout when it comes to what he believes in. i trust him more than the democrats for this reason.
The popular vote says otherwise
It should be regulated no extremism. 🎉
The US Constitution provides only for "the general welfare", like roads and bridges, not government charity to individuals like the almost 100 federal redistribution programs already confiscating money earned by taxpayers. Amending the Federal Constitution is very difficult. State citizens can more easily change their state constitutions to expand their states powers to create government charity welfare states, including "healthcare access" programs. As long as the states have balanced budget laws each state will have realistic limits to curb state politicians pandering to buy votes. Of course, the federal government should not provide money to states that are incapable of governing themselves to pass balanced budgets. The federal government could then reduce federal taxes and let the individual states raise their taxes to continue previously federally funded individual charity welfare programs bringing governments closer to the people they serve. Only by abiding by the Constitution can democracy and our republic be preserved.
It doesn't call for federal infrastructure and the federal government should be almost non existent.
@@nedhill1242 Agreed. "General Welfare" are the most abused words in the Constitution.
Krystal and Ryan the boss over the content on this channel lol
I'm disappointed this was published by BP. They've become increasingly less informative and more opinionated. Leave these to Vice news.
What percent of the nation are all of these:
1. Pro-abortion
2. Women
3. Child bearing age
4. Living in a state where abortions are limited
The answer is less than 2% of the countey fit into all of these categories. That's why it's not the voting priority that people say it is. The people who want abortions already live in states where it's readily available.
We've been saying it for years. I was a Democrat my whole life. Voted for the other guy this time.
'Cause that's a lot better.
Neither candidate of either political party represents the American people... So why would u think you made a good decision?
Also... Our vote didn't and doesn't matter since the electoral college chooses
Good for you, you’re starting to get it! :)
Vote 3rd party!
Break the Monopoly!
@@roscojenkins7451 The electoral college chooses.... after the electors are elected by the votes of voters. 🤡
This is the vacuum for working families party
It’s called racism over logic
If you have a the right to pass a law. Please make laws saying you prefer to do business with states that provide for the citizens
"the other candidate" did NOT support those things. They just SAID IT in public.. didn't do a DAMN THING for me the last 4 years. 27 seconds into this video and I'm already ready to go
The dems refuse to enact ANY of these policies. So why vote for them?
Y’all could have had Bernie…..
It’s shocking how little people who cover politics understand politics. They think Americans vote for president based on their policies. Despite the mountain of evidence every election cycle, like this, that they do not.
The average person isnt mature enough to vote on issues, they vote on vibes. Thats how someone like Rogan become a MAGA cheerleader despite also loving Bernie. These arent serious people.
Bernie was always a clown and was finally exposed. Joe is far from a MAGA cheerleader. He voted for Trump because the Dems are insane and Tulsi and Bobby.
Rogan's biggest issue was "I hate censorship." Interesting how that was branded MAGA by the media as they keep pushing for centralized control over "misinformation"
Kyle stan: detected
Everyone that thinks Republicans aren't equally accountable to voters needs to leave the discussion.
The asymmetry in expectation is staggering.
We're trying to create a representative government here, and we can't do that if the party actually running the government isn't expected to be representative.
I live in Alaska. we vote for these things once a state level. We don't need a federal level sick leave because we took care of it on our own. State level laws work just fine without a federal version. This holds true for minimum wage laws and abortions as well.
I don't think very many people at all voted for abortion to be a Constitutional right. For one, it isn't. Period. Get over it. Two, it very much is a STATE right and that's what people voted. Those who voted for abortion in their state but also voted for Trump made that abundantly clear.
Sure buddy. Whatever you say lol.
Establishment Democrats may feel like supporting Progressive policies, but are given the opportunity to be rich instead.
The Democratic party is the rich donor party, they have long abandoned the working class. Trying to convince them to be who we want them to be is an exercise in futility. We've been through this song and dance soo many times. At what point does repeating the same action and expecting different results become recognized for the insanity that it is?
Saying democrats care about abortion yet they had 3 chances to codify it into law but refused to do so dispels your "point" there.
You can agree and be for these issues all day but if other more pressing issues take priority then 🤷♂️
Well, let's see how America does with an Oligarchy, instead I guess. Anyone voting for Trump because they thought he'd "drain the swamp", we're just getting a different kind of swamp.
These are all state issues and not federal issues. That's why you don't see these issues on Trump's campaign.
Maybe people realize these measures are left to states and should not be decided on the federal level.
Nobody talks about abusing abortion as a contraceptive
Who is this man?
He's Batman
@@ryanslings6234not with that physique
Spencer Snyder I think it has his info in the video description.
@@wisekodiak2668 he's aged. He's no spring chicken. It gets harder to stay in shape over time.
Way to pick the most narrow and inconsequential issues. What a waste of time.
Why is that? Because Kamala Harris didn't really support those things.
It’s time to leave the Democratic Party and build a populist left coalition
I lived in Florida until recently. That 60% rule isn't all bad, back in 2018 there was a poorly worded ballot measure backed by all the major power companies that would've ended cash back incentives for solar power. Gore himself came down to campaign against it but because the wording sounded positive many were fooled into voting for it anyways but it failed to reach 60%.
If you wanna have a relationship, you share your health issues and you make them as a team. You don’t wanna follow these rules and you wanna complain. Stay out of it then.
Because no one believes they will ever actually do any of them.
This is dishonest. Most people are in favor of free money, but not in favor of lower wages in exchange for sick leave, which is the practical outcome of this policy
as long as money is in politics and we don't have term limits, nothing will change!!
Paper abortions should be given the same accessibility as abortions.
Democrats must stop being YT supremacists first - that is my concern!!!
If you can't afford the child, why kill it? Have the child, give it up for adoption. You people are sick!
Breaking Points has become the “disconnected elites” they warn us about. A sad day for a once good show
Conservatives can play this stupid game too; the overwhelming majority of Americans support mass deportations, tough-on-crime policy and would vote to eliminate income tax (at least in their own tax bracket) if they could. Ergo; Americans support CONSERVATIVE policy.
You missed the point of your entire video. We live in a Republic. State's most Republicans understand this. We want the state to have more power than the federal government. Each state should decide what their policies are, not the federal government deciding for everybody.
If you’re talking the right to an appointment and half the bill covered your half as the female that you would cover alongside the male you work with and make the decision equally as a team. Sure, they are plenty of males and females that would be happy to get on board.
Neither parties are for the working class
Because the policies aren’t actually that popular
spreading that abortion misinformation again.
the supreme court decision was not on whether abortion should be legal or illegal. only about whether it was a state or federal issue based on the roe v wade case.
the justices decided correctly. from a purely legal perspective.
and obviously it being a state issue, which trump has affirmed, means that people can vote for it on a state level.
not at all weird that people would vote that way.
you also have to be very specific when talking about "abortion rights" since it covers A LOT of ground.
technically allowing abortions in cases where both mother and child would otherwise die is abortion rights.
so is abortions at will up to the fetus being viable outside the womb with no restrictions and no need for medical consultation.
at yet these are obviously not the same. grouping everything together here is misleading as hell.
When I hear Americans criticizing the Democratic Party, it is almost always about politics and the word socialism. So, if democrats get off of that distracting junk, they'll be able to win enough elections to pass much more serious reform to improve the lot of the lower middle classes. The American public does deserve a lot of blame here because they don't notice when democrats due an act, policy that benefits them or when republicans and act policy that hurts them. Americans for the most part barely pay attention to what's going on in terms of policy and democrats really have to win enough elections to pass very dramatic reforms like medicare for all for them to notice.
Yep, we're sure that everyone loves what we're selling. Even though nobody is actually buying it.
Democrats lost! Because they never deliver...
Democrats offer a lot of aesthetics without substance
Trump said he'd blow sh*t up and people took a chance that maybe something good might come out of that mess
extremists and fanatics care about candidates, normal people care about and vote on issues!
These are not federal issues.States can decide what’s their minimum wage.It cost more to live in New York than Nebraska.Probably should read the10th Amendment again to get a proper perspective.