Night fighting with T80B 1: zero range 2: center hold chevron over target, laze. 3: manually select range to closest hundred meter increment, and hold slightly over or under center mass accordingly (hold over for round down, hold under for round up) 4: profit.
GTD-1000TF came out far later. The engines can run on a lot of fuels including commercial diesel but more commonly on marine diesel, which is a lot cheaper than commercial diesel. It's literally in the name.
You forgot to mention a very important aspect of the fcs:it does not account for vertical lead. If a tank is moving down a steep slope you won't be able to correctly lead it. The Abrams fcs is far superior due to this. If you want to visualize it, find a steep hill follow an imaginary target driving down the hill in a diagonal path with the fcs and fire. You will see that the dcs will only apply lead in the horizontal. Do the same on an Abrams, for example in the scenario "bold limit" and you will see that the Abrams has no issues with this.
Gas turbines are called that not because they ran on gas, but because they use hot gas turbines. They can run on anything actually, diesel, jet fuel, seed oil, petrol, etc. Anything that burns. Their problem is that they consume a ton of fuel to idle
Well.... It can't really. If you hit the turret a little above or below the composite arrays the m833 will go clean through even at 2500 meters. You can't rely on your armor against m833 at all. Against tows or older apfsds the armor is quite reliable.
while the graphics and models are already the best in a tank sim, i wish they would be even more high polygon. like those round surfaces on the barrels, light shrouds, etc are still jagged and angular. even in steel beast, the poly count on tanks is higher, especially in commander mode with the hatches unbuttoned you can see how rounded the lip of the hatches are. in this game they are square and angular, not radiused enough
Superb vid. I realised how much I needed to play SABOW and SF:Kharkov 1942 again, for troops! GHPC is just so sterile without infantry attacking trenches, using RPGs, grenades. Shame it will never happen
"Shame it will never happen"... Nope. Infantry models are still in the works. I also highly recommend Steel Beast for more of a complete sim and for those pesky infantry rpg teams.
Not sure if it was choice of words, but you said that the sg-1000 was controversial because it used gas instead of diesel. But the engine ran on the standard diesel as well as jet fuel, and of course could also run on gasoline. I have not read anything on them requiring gasoline, and the controversy comes just from the higher diesel fuel consumption that the gas turbine has over the piston diesel.
The first T-80 series used GTD‑1000TF gas turbine engines, which is what I said. From what I read and understood, they decided to go with gas instead of the traditional diesel like the other T-series tanks. It was first rejected because of its high consumption rate until a new leadership change happened.
@PhanPhantasy That's what I thought. It was just the choice of words. Saying "because it used gas instead of diesel" it sounds like your describing the fuel being used as opposed to the engine type.
@@PhanPhantasy Just did a quick read on the GHPC website, and it did mention about the alleged delay. However, it was talking about a delay for giving a ballistic solution, not a delay for the rangefinder to give the range. With that said, it's just a trivial mistake.
@@chrisblack6258 it depends on the conditions example if it's foggy/dusty battlefield when it can be as much as 3-5 seconds but normally it's about 1 second Shawshank redamation who is a T-64BV gunner did a hour and 25 minute video in 1A33 FCS and 1G42 gun sight fully backing it down and also showing the inside of the 1G42 sight
How good is the AI in GHPC? The one most disappointing thing about Arma 3 is that the driver AI was so pathetic. They couldn't even drive from A to B without tipping over when they hit a bush or tree, even the tanks.
@@PhanPhantasy sorry dude... "Gunner HEAT PC" didnt seem like a game name to me. Watched the video a while back and had to go look in the history. I feel like something i generally detest haha
Gas turbines can run on diesel. Basically any fuel that can be atomized into a fine aerosol can be used in gas turbines. That's their advantage. BUT yes, the maintenance is a nightmare.
![ลองสุ่มไอโฟน 990 โกงมั้ย? [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.101 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bfsWe0j492k/mqdefault.jpg)
I used to be a tanker like you, then I got a Sabot round to my knee
🍷🗿 ahhh, I see a man of culture
The extra equipment lost count was from the loss of the Mi-2
Ah, true. Poor heli 🫡
wake up babe, PhanPhantasy just updated t80 gunnery guide
Night fighting with T80B
1: zero range
2: center hold chevron over target, laze.
3: manually select range to closest hundred meter increment, and hold slightly over or under center mass accordingly (hold over for round down, hold under for round up)
4: profit.
Can't wait for the T-64B
The t80 is the coolest soviet tank out there
Check out Objekt 195. Thank god they collapsed before they could finalize it.😅
@@TacticalEd Can you explain what's so outstanding about it? Don't know much about tanks.
Ngl, if this had destructible environment and coop, I'd be in instantly. And at least two of my buddies as well.
Co-op is planned.
According to the roadmap on the game's official site, enhanced destruction and co-op are definitely the direction they want to go.
GTD-1000TF came out far later.
The engines can run on a lot of fuels including commercial diesel but more commonly on marine diesel, which is a lot cheaper than commercial diesel. It's literally in the name.
На керосине он работает. Остальное можно, но не рекомендуется. В мирное время только керосин
@@CorRubrum Wrong. Kerosene is a myth. Marine diesel is used.
@@CorRubrum Kerosene is only used by 4th guards, petrol is the only fuel not recommended. The rest is fine, most of them use diesel.
You forgot to mention a very important aspect of the fcs:it does not account for vertical lead. If a tank is moving down a steep slope you won't be able to correctly lead it. The Abrams fcs is far superior due to this. If you want to visualize it, find a steep hill follow an imaginary target driving down the hill in a diagonal path with the fcs and fire. You will see that the dcs will only apply lead in the horizontal. Do the same on an Abrams, for example in the scenario "bold limit" and you will see that the Abrams has no issues with this.
I heard that there are some parts of the t 80 fcs that give it an edge compared to the abrams one
Gas turbines are called that not because they ran on gas, but because they use hot gas turbines. They can run on anything actually, diesel, jet fuel, seed oil, petrol, etc. Anything that burns. Their problem is that they consume a ton of fuel to idle
Wow, didn't know T-80B could shrug off M833s at such a close range
Those tanks are sure impressive, and very effective but let's keep in mind that they are top of the notch for Soviet forces ;D
@@ex4lt341not in this case.
T-64B has same armour and T-72B has slightly better turret armour, but worse FCS.
Well.... It can't really. If you hit the turret a little above or below the composite arrays the m833 will go clean through even at 2500 meters. You can't rely on your armor against m833 at all. Against tows or older apfsds the armor is quite reliable.
@@ex4lt341 the T 80U which has even better armor is not yet in the game
@@PyromaN93на т80б была 5ти слойная влд, на т64 любой модификации 3х.
Well done video.
Would you be able to touch on the T-64’s limit of coincidence rangefinder below 1000m in the next video? Any tips?
I've already made a video on the T-64s fire control systems th-cam.com/video/mz7rS1KQvLY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=bQSoWaIonJo4wP-L
@@PhanPhantasyoh whoops my bad
*facepalms*
Late time here doesn’t helppp…. I should really sleep huh.
Apologies.
Please do enjoy your week/weekend!
You can set a battlesight range of 800m for HE and HEAT and 1200m for APFSDS. This also applies to the T-55A, T-62, and the T-80B's night sight.
while the graphics and models are already the best in a tank sim, i wish they would be even more high polygon. like those round surfaces on the barrels, light shrouds, etc are still jagged and angular. even in steel beast, the poly count on tanks is higher, especially in commander mode with the hatches unbuttoned you can see how rounded the lip of the hatches are. in this game they are square and angular, not radiused enough
Superb vid. I realised how much I needed to play SABOW and SF:Kharkov 1942 again, for troops! GHPC is just so sterile without infantry attacking trenches, using RPGs, grenades. Shame it will never happen
"Shame it will never happen"... Nope. Infantry models are still in the works. I also highly recommend Steel Beast for more of a complete sim and for those pesky infantry rpg teams.
who said it'll never happen?
18:45 "I used to be a tankist like you untill I took a sabot round to the knee"
I got hit by several tows in this thing. Im surprised it took them well.
Will there be soviet T-72s added or were they not present in Germany at the time period?
Not present with the Soviet Forces in Germany.
@@PhanPhantasy Damn, guess i will wait for the T-64B.
18:50 if he just got hit, by a sabot to the knee..... hmm... amassive lawn dart hittin gmy kneecap, what would happen 🤔
Nice bro
can you please post your FPS , resolution and CPU/GPU/Memory, i would like to compare with mine slide show. Many thanks
Not sure if it was choice of words, but you said that the sg-1000 was controversial because it used gas instead of diesel. But the engine ran on the standard diesel as well as jet fuel, and of course could also run on gasoline. I have not read anything on them requiring gasoline, and the controversy comes just from the higher diesel fuel consumption that the gas turbine has over the piston diesel.
The first T-80 series used GTD‑1000TF gas turbine engines, which is what I said. From what I read and understood, they decided to go with gas instead of the traditional diesel like the other T-series tanks. It was first rejected because of its high consumption rate until a new leadership change happened.
The other controversial part is how much more expensive the turbine engine itself is compared to your standard V12 diesel.
@PhanPhantasy That's what I thought. It was just the choice of words. Saying "because it used gas instead of diesel" it sounds like your describing the fuel being used as opposed to the engine type.
@plswhy certainly in up front costs.l definetly.
@@plswhy Thats why the T-80UD exists
I'm pretty sure the ranging is instant IRL. Only in ARMA 3 it takes time to range
No. The 1A33 has a bit of calculations delay but this isn't implemented in GHPC.
@@PhanPhantasy Interesting if that's the case, considering ranging on T-72A/B/M1 is done instantly
@@PhanPhantasy Just did a quick read on the GHPC website, and it did mention about the alleged delay. However, it was talking about a delay for giving a ballistic solution, not a delay for the rangefinder to give the range. With that said, it's just a trivial mistake.
@@chrisblack6258 it depends on the conditions example if it's foggy/dusty battlefield when it can be as much as 3-5 seconds but normally it's about 1 second
Shawshank redamation who is a T-64BV gunner did a hour and 25 minute video in 1A33 FCS and 1G42 gun sight fully backing it down and also showing the inside of the 1G42 sight
the t80 experience is :
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
gotta love turbines.
How good is the AI in GHPC? The one most disappointing thing about Arma 3 is that the driver AI was so pathetic. They couldn't even drive from A to B without tipping over when they hit a bush or tree, even the tanks.
Are this game still single player?
yes it is but its in the future plans i think
What game is this ? I dont see a title
It's Gunner HEAT PC. It's on the title and I've mentioned it in the video.
@@PhanPhantasy sorry dude... "Gunner HEAT PC" didnt seem like a game name to me. Watched the video a while back and had to go look in the history. I feel like something i generally detest haha
The original flying tank 🔥🔥🔥
Holy hell basically no night vision and can lase at night ?!! In the 80's ?!! It would've been a blood bath
80s soviet CAS had ZERO night capacity. Without illumination flares, they are pretty much blind and useless at night.
Gas turbines can run on diesel. Basically any fuel that can be atomized into a fine aerosol can be used in gas turbines. That's their advantage. BUT yes, the maintenance is a nightmare.
Б = B
К = K
О = O
У= U