Top 7 Best Strategic Bombers in the World
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ก.ค. 2024
- A strategic bomber is a medium- to long-range penetration bomber aircraft designed to drop large amounts of air-to-ground weaponry onto a distant target for the purposes of debilitating the enemy's capacity to wage war.
We lists some of the Top 7 Best Strategic Bombers in the World operational Today.
Other videos you might like:
The Biggest Aircraft Carriers ► • The World's Biggest Ai...
No One Wants to Fight the A-10 Warthog ► • Why No One Wants to Fi...
Javelin Anti-Tank Missile ► • How Powerful is Javeli...
🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO US ► th-cam.com/users/USMilitaryN...
Thank You - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
The B-2 is not "primarily" operated by the US Air Force. It is operated ONLY by the US Air Force.
No crap we all got that without that pointless input
@@nicholasmupchurch604 The U2 program was with the Air Force and then the CIA took it over for a while - or have you forgotten the "1960 U2 incident". So it's possible that any other organization of the U.S. security/defense apparatus can justify taking it under its wing (see what I did there?).
No one NO ONE CAN BUY THE B-2 SPIRIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
True
@@TeezMalt every nation will get the b-2 but it’s 2.2 billion dollars well sadly the whole planet cannot buy the B-2 spirit
Everybody gangster till the sky start screamin
Don't run, you'll only die tired.
บํอว่าถีงได้กาพคุน
Brrrrrrt
Чё бро?!
You forgot Canada's Beaver class Cessna 303, two-man bombers with both smoke and frag hand-released grenade payload variants.
Aboot the best plane evr made aye!
Arcsecant good one years later 🇺🇸⚓️
It isn't strategic, and anyway, the Canadians are ruled out since their Avro-adventure. So are the norty British with their TSR 2.
@@Retroscoop what do any of those have to do with bombers?
The "Beaver," the single most iconic bush plane of all time, is an all-Canadian design built by de Havilland of Canada. As the old saying went, the Beaver was your "half ton truck with wings" and its larger cousin, the Otter, was your "one ton truck..." These aircraft have, for over six decades, been absolutely essential to the Canadian economy as the vast majority of Canada's uninhabited North is not accessible by road. On a side note, American actor Harrison Ford (of Han Solo fame) has one among his collection of aircraft and calls it his personal favorite... "the rugged spirit of the wilderness embodied in a thoroughbred Canadian design."
Where did you find your research for this video and the B-1b Lancer? There’s a whole lot of details about this aircraft that are worth listing. I literally broke my back about 6 different times over 10 years working on them. I still get chills watching a low level, wings swept, very high rate of speed flyby! I miss my maintainer family a lot as well.
I found it funny that they named a hanger at Edwards after Bennefield, who screwed up and killed his crew in testing of the B-1.
@@johntomasik1555 Is that so?
Seeing the TU-160 last year in South Africa was incredible!
B1 ripoff. Its like they were all in bed together.
@@pamcheney3239 Lmao not even look same
@CAG Hotshot
That is the reason for military espionage.
Das ist der Sinn der Militärspionage.
@CAG Hotshot Funny thing is, you've done the same to the Germans in WWII, reverse-engineering u-boats. And did you forget the Russian yak-38 and yak-141. F-35's vtol design? LOL.
Seeing the Tu-160 flying to Venezuela two years ago in California was ... The spectators had to change diapers ...
70 B1B Lancers ready for action at any given time, that's awesome
Based on range and payload capacity you said ...
Since they can refuel midair lets stick to what they can carry:
1 Tu-160 40000kg(about 88000lb)
2 B-1B 34000kg(about 75000lb)
3 B-52 31500kg(about 70000lb)
4 Tu22M 24000kg(about 53000lb)
5 B-2 18000kg(about 40000lb)
6 Tu-95 15000kg(about 33000lb)
7 H-6 10000kg(about 22000lb)
but i guess that's why you're "US" military news...
B2 is undetectable by radar mostly unless its a very targetted search between multiple bands and the B1 Lancer has the speed and ability to quickly get in range and shoot long range cruise missiles and then exit the area its not always about oayload
B2 perfectly easy to track in damp/rainy weather
@@bootymane9907 Stealth only applies to American taxpayers. The Serbs shot down the invisible man with a household microwave and an old Soviet rocket... I shouldn't have destroyed your fantasies
Евгений Палеев pogs imagine losing a stealth bomber to a microwave
And the unit cost. Don't forget that one.
Your channel should be much more popular. It is very good.
b-3 ?
Of course! In Russia we like to see Bonhomme Richard fire... BlackLifeMatters riots in the democratiest country of the World... Please, continue... We are watching... And waiting... )))
Very interesting
At last for 17 years, I found Leaflet Drop icon from CC Zero Hour in a real photo 5:49
I have understood almost every word in the sentence (CC have excluded), but can't understand the sentence... Can you translate this to simple English with comments?
The list on the b1b lancer didn’t seem like it was going to end lol
b1b is going to end lol
Thank you for your service
Hello from Russia, American friends🇷🇺🇺🇸
No, we are NOT friends with Russia !
@@otavioa7544 , Chill ? I am just telling it like it is.
No sugar coating it.
ALPHA and OMEGA our governments might not like one another but as civilians there’s no point in hating each other
chanctonbury63 where is Boris? I don’t see him.🤷♂️
@A E Putin or Trump wheres the difference?
Other bombers: “Noooo! You can’t just pull off maneuvers that only a fighter can do!”
The Bone: *Haha do a barrel roll!*
8:09
I T C A N O V E R C O M E S O F I S T I C A T E D A A B Y R O L L I N G L M A O
Not sure how that roll would be useful against a jet fighter, even the best bombers don't stand a chance, their safety is in far distances or being accompanied by other allied jet fighters
The new The Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider will be a massive game changer which will pack the Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb, the B-61-12 thermonuclear gravity bomb, and the Long Range Stand Off (LRSO) nuclear-capable cruise missile. Note It is only one part of a family of strike systems. The Air Force conceived Raider as one piece in an overarching architecture of systems designed to support long-range strike missions That “family” of systems (as the Air Force calls it) includes air frames, munitions, reconnaissance systems, electronic warfare platforms, and resilient communications channels. Some features of this architecture, such as the role played by reconnaissance satellites, are not publicly discussed. B-21 will have the functionality to tap into any feature of this architecture that is useful in accomplishing its strike missions.
May I ask? A year has passed, has there been any news about what you described in your comment? How are things going with the ultra-long-range. super heavy and hypersonic systems??? Still not???
@@loftagqx all I can gather from the countless new and exotic announcements coming out of Russia and China is that they appear to be talking big time up those weapons that you mention, the Americans and the rest are as per usual less talkative about the comings and goings of theirs !
@@SNOWDONTRYFAN on, hypersonic tests are carried out systematically, though all unsuccessful... well, for the rest, only money is knocked out in Congress... every year )
U got the right stuff....Thanks..!
It's partiality I think the russian tu160 is the heaviest,fastest and most payload carrying bomber in the world and putting it on number 3 is not fair,this is a us sponsored channel, so guys those who need real comparison or top 10 videos check other channels who will show unbiased comparison.Thank you🙏🇮🇳
@Madulas pag Basa B1 or B2 can only deliver to papuas or beduins... S-300, S-350, S-400, S-500, Tor, Buk, Pantsir can stop all your fling irons... and F-22, F-35 too... )))
Envy & keep yelping "America Über Alles"!
boogabootoo none of that made sense lol
@@boogabootoo these russian defences are pretty much harder to penetrate as russia is good in making air defence systems in comparison to others.and when the s500 will be ready then nothing existing now the names you mentioned is useless and will be overwhelmed by s500😅
@@lordisback1947 Our air defence is multi-range. S-300,400,500 - protect long & average distance (S-500 even near orbits). S-350, Tor, Buk - average. Pantsir - near distance & it guards the S-... And all of them are working in a bundle, exchanging info about targets.
@@Jbolo123 None of you & your country made sense ))
9:25 that's really a mouthful
What does it mean? Can you comment?
beautiful but dangerous birds..😯
The tips of the propellers isn't what makes the Tu-95 so loud, Its because of the friction created by the counter rotation!
Too bad the Vulcan is long retired. It belongs alongside these aircraft for its iconic design, its wartime service in the Falklands, and especially for the truly glorious howl of its Olympus turbojets at full throttle. The Bear may be louder, but the Vulcan is sweeter.
I stood at Biggin Hill with my lad a few years back. Saw a Vulcan flanked either side by 2 Typhoons. It was the loudest noise from engines I will ever hear in my life. The Phoons turned on after burners went vertically in the just as they were about to pass us. I'm telling you, the ground was shaking when the Vulcan flew slowly pass. Sweet is the correct way to describe it. Not sure the Vulcan can carry the latest weapons or if it could, carry then very far.
Nice thought though. But the UK government believe that the sub is the best platform to launch our nuclear deferent so i can totally why the UK doesn't have strategic bomber of their own. Because we sure know that could build one just as good as the Americans.
Not sure if you implied to the contrary - but you listed the B-1B as being able to carry B61/83 bombs - which yes it can physically carry - but the B-1B is not longer a nuclear capable bomber as it has been converted to conventional bombing duties only. Loved the video!
This is old. Are they still going to make it a missile truck? (Working with platforms like F-35 and such)
Or is the B1B dead
What's the difference between nuclear capable and not? I assumed that a bomb as a bomb, and as long as the weight could be carried, any plane could drop a nuclear bomb.
@@mihalis1010 Nuclear Capable I believe incorporates specific shielding and coatings to deal with radiation. The USAF only has a few airframes that care designated as "Nuclear Capable" which include the B-2 Spirit, B-52 Stratofortress, and I believe the F-16. This may not be an exhaustive list (as I am not a USAF airframe expert or maintainer) but I do know the B-1Bs lost their Nuclear Capable designation during some refitting years ago and their emphasis is now on conventional armaments.
@@BBCharger5spd American nuclear Shields comes built into tthe bomb not the aircraft.
@@BBCharger5spd what are you talking about, the B-1B-D&E Models are “nuclear” capable. The B-52, B-1B and B-2 “bomber wise” are all “nuclear” capable. Idk where you’re getting that the B-1 isn’t but it is, and you can’t say the B-1 isn’t coated with “nuclear shielding” means it’s not capable, who knows maybe the B-1 is coated with a protection layer and the USAF hasn’t mentioned it or maybe the bombs/missiles are… who knows.
Nice
That Bone doing a roll…gets me every time! 8:05 🤙🏼
India never operated TU 22M. However Indian navy had used TU 92(now retired).
You are absolutely right but still it is confusing to mention here that not only this channel but several others YT channels from time to time have reported about India operating Tu22M3 Bombers with its operational bases operating from car nicobar airbase/ Landfall Naval airbase in Great nicobar island 😅😄😃😃😅
Did you know that the Tupolev Tu-95 Bear was the plane that dropped the Tsar Bomba?
Bobby Liberator464 that grants it ultimate bomber rank
@TheOGGamer0428 Xbox-Minecraft yes but actually no, thanks to the data of Tsar Bomb the Russians have managed to build a nuclear torpedo with a power of 100 megatons called poseidon.
@TheOGGamer0428 Xbox-Minecraft yes. But that weapon is for ultimate defense. If you want peace prepare the war
@TheOGGamer0428 Xbox-Minecraft Really....!!!!!!!!
@TheOGGamer0428 Xbox-Minecraft It was a scientific project, no one would want to drop the Tsar' Bomba on civilians.
I love the Paint Job on the Back Fire.
« إِنَّ اللَّهَ وَمَلَائِكَتَهُ يُصَلُّونَ عَلَى النَّبِيِّ ۚ يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا صَلُّوا عَلَيْهِ وَسَلِّمُوا تَسْلِيمًا » 🥰
Yes - the B1's potential weapon loads will be in the test next week.
What is the load - again bricks? )))
The Tu-16/H-6, the Tu-95, and the B=52 are (give or take a bit) based on designs that are 65+ years old and all will be surviving another 20+ years I bet. Basically all USAF and Soviet/Russian gear - the Chines h-6 is a licensed produced copy. Nobody else has a need or ability to operate long range strategic bombers.
Makes you wonder if they are even relevant
@@badlandskid they are still very useful since they can be used to launch hypersonic missiles. Smaller fighter craft doesn’t have that much space to host these missiles.
@@frankfan9127 good point
THE B-52 STRATA FORTRESS IS TRUELY AWESOME. LIKE A FINE BOTTLE OF WINE THE OLDER IT GETS THE BETTER IT FLY'S 🔥💥🎇🎆💯🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 !!!!
I'd be like a child during Christmas if I was the pilot for the Lancer. And heard that list of ordinance. That was so cool.
6:55 Love the fog lights.... 😎
Nice vid for newbies..tbh they are the top 7 because they are the only 7 in service
And your point is master?
@@donaldmurray978 exactly what I said above
Oh. Thank you master. We are all stupid and rely on you infinit wisdom oh master. What a tool
@@donaldmurray978 well you said it..not me, but some do have intimate first hand knowledge on this subject. These 7 airframes are the only "strategic" bombers still in service
@Matthew McPeek lies
Well done
Tu-160 is by far the best bomber today
I’ve seen the B-2 Twice, both times it was SO AWESOME. They flew right over my school
it's funny - you proud american technique from the previous century because in our century america can't build anything normally working... f-35 - typical example )))
U.S. nambawan
@@boogabootoo Then why are Russia and China trying to copy American stealth strategies with their failing SUck-57 and Junk-20?
@@randomdude7301 Stealth tech is an old Soviet Russian tech, published in last centure in free & open papers, like pop mech )))
Your Fuck-22 & Fuck-35 is only flying irons & can be detected with old Soviet radars. And i'm not talking about S-400 etc... ))) Suck off & envy...
@@randomdude7301 u do know america needed to buy yak38 tech to make the f35 XD yet again people another overly biased american and yes I am also fully american ACCEPT THE FACT THAT AMERICA ISNT ALWAYS THE BEST COME BACK WHEN UR NOT BIASED
Tu-160 is something totally
different
Junk?
@@GlobalRage B-1B?
@@lightningbolt5431 How many sorties has the B-1 flown? and then how many has the Russian? lol at ya bro! 600 mph 100 feet off the ground you hear it after it goes over your head...seriously you are clueless.
@@GlobalRage How many against organized army? Oh yeah some deseart niggas in XL size flipflop. Send that against a country which actually have an army. Even ground force will shot it down.
I never heard it or never will because it will eat dirt before it come any closer to my country.
@@lightningbolt5431 you are a paper tiger barks and don't bite,and too much propaganda about your junk tech
Thanks
Giving some info in miles and some in KM’s in confusing, it would be great if you could harmonise the facts
Loud and Proud the Tupolev Bear is to be respected for the load it carries!
Oh yeah the plane can be heard by submarines!! That’s why any Russian bomber is a piece of $@%}!!!
Good lord the B1B payload capability 08:34. That was one long list.
You can use b1b to transportation of bananas... There is no any useful war tasks for this flying iron...
B-52 and the Bear are the real champions..... decades of service and decades more to come.
They both outlived multiple plans to replace them (the other surviving bombers on the list weren't specifically planned as replacements).
B-21 going into production says hi from the future.
1991 in the sand box we could see the B-52s headed East about an hour later they were on the way back to Diago Garcia.
I was first armored 19k thank you for your service as well
Wow, all three of our bombers are on this list! LETS GO USA
lol... That is ALL the bombers of the World
@@thesirmaddog8209 Which is both hilarious and sad.
@@Predator42ID
Actually its good cause its less tension than if more countries had them
@@mlodyczaja
LOL... Name them... I know I keep up with Aircraft... Only 3 countries have them China has one and Russia has 3 and U.S. has 3 for now, the U.S. soon will be down to only 2 types
@@mlodyczaja ??? They just listed 7 ReWatch
Nafikiri ubora na kutoonekana kwa ndege husika kumezingatiwa. Tanzania
These birds are pretty amazing! Seems they are used alot during war.
The Tu-22M3 was never operated in India as claimed at 04:07. The Tu-142M were operated by the Indian Navy for maritime reconnaissance and ASW, which are replaced by Boeing P-8I Neptune. Any of the Indian Armed Forces never had Tu-22M3.
Tu-160 and Tu-22m3 are the best, because they are now able to carry hypersonic weapons.
First you have to have a hyper sonic weapon that works. So far, you ain’t got it.
@@MrTunaChaser kinzhal works. And as of now, so does the zirkon.
Have a nice day.
@@MrTunaChaser 2 years later we can now confirm you were wrong.
Cool
The Lancer is just nex level badassery!! 🇺🇸💪
Watching a B1 do a barrel role is freaking amazing
It was a Roll not a barrel roll.
@@Ace-Av8er as long as it's King's Hawaiian I won't argue over terminology.
What is the containment of the barrel - is it was a salt cucumbers?
Love the B2. One of the craziest planes to ever be designed and flat out the best bomber ever designed.
It needs a computer to compensate for flight instabilities, is subsonic and outrageously expensive. The TU 160 carries a bigger bomb load and has a longer range, not to mention supersonic capabilities. If it wasn't for it's stealth, the B2 would be near the bottom of the pack.
@@jsmariani4180 LOL blocked, enjoy trolling elsewhere. Trying to compare the TU160 to the B2 and actually thinking the TU160 is better. The B1B lancer, carries a larger payload by over 20,000 pounds, has similar speed(Being the B1A model is even faster then the TU160, and they didn't mass produce it, why? Speed ruins stealth and gives a higher RCS) and it's nowhere near as good as the B2, but by your logic the B1B must be the best bomber ever since it carries a larger payload then the TU160 and has similar speed. Trolls kill me. Enjoy trolling others.
@@ThatCarGuy well have the trolls claiming that the f 35 is way better than the su 57 kill u?
@@jsmariani4180 That is correct and, moreover, the B-2 has never competed against an equal opponent, a real air defense. His "enemies" were always hopelessly inferior "enemies", as if an adult man were taking away the toys from the little boys in the playground. Das ist korrekt und dazu kommt noch dass der B-2 noch nie gegen einen ebenbürtigen Gegner, eine richtige Luftabwehr, angetreten ist . Seine "Feinde" waren immer hoffnungslos unterlegene "Feinde", etwa so als würde ein erwachsener Mann den kleinen Jungs, auf dem Spielplatz, die Spielsachen wegnehmen.
@@jsmariani4180 yes, but is stealth, so is first
- list of best with range and load capacity
- B-2 №1
pick one
Nice video . 😎
TU160 Number one! =)
Too bad ballistic missiles are replacing supersonic bombers :(
@@myusername3689 Tu-160 (White Swan, not blackjack) is the best strategic missile carrier. X-101 can fly 5500 km. Nuclear variant X-102 - more distance. We can do the Fallout game is real for you with Tu-160 from our territory. And White Swans are only one part of the Triad.
@@myusername3689 >Too bad ballistic missiles
American missiles - yes, you right. Minuteman is bad, Tomahawk is worst. American industry is still in degradation.
Russian RS-28 Sarmat with ordinary warhead penetrates (like a hot knife into butter) through your missile defense. Sarmat can carry hypersonic glider Avangard, as you know. The Burevestnik? The Poseidon? Don't be a menace to Russia while drinking your juice in the hood.
@@boogabootoo I never said russian missiles are bad I just said they’re replacing their bombers with missiles.
@@myusername3689 Bomber can be used to destroy ISIS, for example, without a strong air defense system. And only. Multilevel air defense system like in Russia makes them useless. S-500, 400, 350, 300, Buk, Tor, Pantzir, Tunguska... And we don't take into account fighters and interceptors.
I'm pretty he ment to say that the B-2 spirit is operated Solely by the U.S. Airforce instead of primarily.
You must send them all to Russia, Russian S-300/400/500 needs some targets for praxis
... )))
Porque no mencionan el armamento completo y variado que puede transportar el tupolev 160?
finally, a speaker without a whiny nasal voice.
the best bombers are b52 and tu95 they tried to replace it many times but they outlived them and still strong
The vulcan was better than the b52
Are you kuddin’?
@@Hattonbank look up operation sky shield
@@ferdypl322 I know about that, but the Vulcan was withdrawn 40 years ago. I could argue that the Victor was better, or the B-58 or Nirage IV both in different ways.
I loved the Vulcan but it could not really be compared some of those on the list.
They need to base these rankings, on which one has whooped the most ass over the years. That would be the B-52 by a mile.
The Bone does it with more style, and speed.
...also suffered the most combat losses.
13o0tylici0u5 because it saw the most combat...
@@medic6039 Seeing more combat doesn't make an aircraft design any better ... seeing more combat or less is purely the result of politics. If the U.S. had turned isolationist following 'nam and never sold the F-15 to Israel or deployed its own to the gulf, would the F-15 be a worse 'aircraft' simply because it hadn't seen action?
@@otyliciu you dodged the point of the comment the B52 has by far seen the most combat there would most likely see more losses in combat. It had nothing to do with it being the best bomber.
Gotta try that
The B52 is a BADASS!!
I'm sure you know, but for "some reason" forgot it... TU-160 should be on first place)
Ту-160 не какой-то там бомбардировщик, Ту-160 - ракетоносец... Этим всё сказано... )))
@@boogabootoo, и не просто ракетоносец, а стратегический этить-колотить)
@@serghw Прости, слово "стратегический" забыл упомянуть... )))
Но для них всё-равно B-1B - лучший! И Патриоты их самые лучшие! И даже летающие индейские топоры - Томогавки, - тоже! )))
@@boogabootoo, как говорится, Задорнов был прав!
@@serghw В эпоху толерантности - ну альтернативно одарённые! )))
the b1's weapons... holy! can you repeat that lmao
TU 160 has deadly red carrots :V
@@milokhanh313 Ты про ядерные смертоносные морковки? )))
The B-2 sprit bomber is my favorite bomber
Sorry I missed it but, what is the crew size on a B1-B?
Why does it feel like the USAF has been the Russia’s R&D department for the last half century?
@@mburnhors Why does their "copy" fly nearly twice as fast as our "original" then? Reality is that the laws of math and physics are universal and different nations, building aircraft to meet similar strategic requirements, are likely to produce similar solutions (1+1=2 is true everywhere, not just in 'Murica).
@CAG Hotshot The Tu-22, from which the Tu-22M was directly derived, first flew twelve years earlier than the B-1A. Neither the variable geometry wing nor new power plant, the most notable changes in the Tu-22M, were American inventions. Sometimes, it is better to base arguments on what actually happened (any professional discipline will demand it) than on what you would simply prefer to imagine.
Love our military, the best in the world.
It's kind of crazy but a single US super carrier has a larger "air force" on board than 70% of the worlds militaries, often a single super carrier is enough to establish air superiority in most areas. Also, the worlds largest air force is the US Air Force, with #2 being... the US Navy and the US army still appears in the top 10 depending on how you count them. The Army though doesnt have that sophisticated of an air force, they mostly have older air craft and drones, but the US Air Force and Navy both have top tier quality air craft.
@@arthas640 It's kind of crazy that one single russian supersonic missile launched from a submarine, a navy ship, a plane or a truck 5.000 miles away, travelling 20 times the sound speed can disappear a US Aircraft Carrier in the middle of the ocean.
The black Jack is such a beautiful plane
Copy of the B1, same as the Soviets copied a stolen B29.
f35 is a copy of yak 141
Cool planes 👍
I have not watched it yet but number 1 is probably the b2 stealth bomber
and thats a joke, b2 is designed for hollywood, not for war
Never liked Tu-95 before but it just looks so cool in the 21st century!
Ask Howard Hughes how he feels about counter-rotating propellers.
I love the F117 Stealth!
B-52 is powerful bomber - Vietnamese are the only ones could shot down these superfortress , about 35 of them. Now you can see B-52 wrack in Huu Tiep lake, Hanoi.
No offense, but I guess, the Vulcan did deserve a place in here. Even if you had to make a list of Top 8!
I know
Amit Sharma the Vulcan ain’t in operation today
Yeah it’s my fav plane
No longer in operation.
If you see what a complicated effort it took to drop a few bombs on the Falklands, I'm not even sure it can be called "strategic".... But I saw it flying above the house I was born in, and on the Belgian Air Force Base of Kleine Brogel, it looked impressive indeed, although I prefered the early white version compared to the camouflage outfit. And I'm sure if you would have added the Vulcan, the French would object their Mirage IV is not in the list etc.
I like the weapon US, compact, perfect..
Smashing all notorious MOB over
Самое смешное,то что ТУ - 95 и Ту - 160 стреляют ракетами дальность которых 3000 км! Им не нужно куда то лететь,им нужно подняться в воздух!!!!!))
Ну вообще-то, Х-101 - неядерный вариант, летит на 5500 км, а ядерный - Х-102, еще дальше... Пущщай супостат трепещет... )))
TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!
@@texanpride2007 What does it mean? Типа - о чём ты, чувачок?
И быть унечтоженными системами пво или перехватчиками.👍
The Tu 160 it's better than B1
B-1B is the BEST LOOKING bomber , ever....F-111 was also beautiful and XB-70 would have the BEST looking and the fastest bomber if it would have gone into service.
Don't forget the B-58
Tu-160 and TU-22 look much much better. TU-160 IS BEST LOOKING EVER BOMBER.
Oh B1 can obey... Use the Force, Luke! )))
Top 7 Best Strategic Bombers in the World. SUPER. SUPER. SUPER.
That's a lot of metric designations used for a video meant for US audience 😂
hey - you are unmistakably the speaker of WATOP too !!!
I love the b52 sooooo much
Tu160 surpasses all these bombers in most indicators. Speed, maximum altitude, combat load, range. B2 spirit can not develop even half the speed of the Tu160 and carries a load almost half as much. Yes, it is theoretically inconspicuous, but only theoretically. A serious air defense system it will not pass, it will be perfectly seen and destroyed. At the same time, the Tu160 may not enter the air defense zone at all. The Use of X101 cruise missiles with a range of up to 5500 kilometers allows you to solve a wide range of tasks at a safe distance without using any stealth. Although these missiles are of course much more expensive than conventional bombs.
but b-2 invisible
@@danielbeaudin7888 invisible😂😂😂
@@danielbeaudin7888 The F-117 was also completely invisible, but in 1999 it was shot down by a missile created in the USSR in the 60s of the last century - the SA-3 Goa. The Su-35 in Syria easily detected and filmed the invisible F-22. Do you believe the propagandists from the Pentagon telling fairy tales to increase the budget?
On the beggining of video says list of best with range and load capacity, then TU 160 is on third place...loool
Of course american hammer is better than Russian Tiger! )))
Of course american patriot is better than Russian S-400! )))
B1b still my favourite
On them they will fly to the stars.
TU-160 looks very similar to B 1B.
My favorite bomber is still the Bear. It's the Chuck Norris of airplanes.
It was a remarkable solution, using technologies at hand, to a strategic need many thought beyond Soviet technologies of the time.
@Archangel Migel For a jet, however, the B-52 isn't as exceptional as the Tu-95 is for a turbo prop (literally the fastest non-jet aircraft ever made).
@Archangel Migel As they first flew during exactly the same year, it is rather hard to call one an "imitation" of the other. As per which has destroyed more targets, that is a result of foreign policy as much as it is of the aircraft. Russia simply has not embarked on many foreign wars where they felt compelled to actually use their strategic bomber force. The cruise missile capability is one the Bear also has. Most effective strategic bomber of all time? So, in your view, the B-52 has performed a greater role in the U.S. military than the B-17, B-24, B-29 etc.? That makes sense.
Big targets!
hey nick they can and will defend themselves ! enmey can launch we send back 30 of the deadly air weapons !
Smash the Rogers onsite
A single Tu-160 with 12,300 km (7,600 mi, 6,600 nmi) practical range without in-flight refuelling, carry 12 kh 101/102 nuke payload range 4500-5500km..
Who need stealth when you can launched standoff missile from great great distance and return to base safely..
Think smart.
Они до сих пор считают важным незаметно проникнуть на территорию противника! Хотя их прекрасно видно - у нас многодиапазонные радары. Но эту идею "Amerika über alles" - можно вышибить только Русским Ядерным Молотом Правосудия и Возмездия! Он бьёт только раз - но навсегда!
@Massimo Hack
What range B2 standoff missile ?
How many weapons load B2 can carry ?
Before you talk nonsense..please check info about Tu160 and Kh101/Kh102..
Why this aircraft being no1 for weapon load and speed for bomber, jamming and range with minimal support.
About the missile this aircraft carry, check how far this missile can go, weight of the warhead and if this is missile Kh family are STEALTH ?
After that you can comment..
сам себя не похвалишь-никто не похвалит
da eto tochna
Все очень правильно расставлено. Я бы еще на третье место B-52 поставил. Твой путин за все время ни одного стратегического бомбардировщика не построил... То, что представлено - это старая советская техника. Китайская копия Ту-16 и то посовременнее будет.
Content de suivre les découvertes récente et anciennes
The Tu-22 looks so ridiculous from the front that I thought the thumbnail was photoshopped
Say this to terrorists in Syria... They will laught... in their graves...