SAARC: - Members: Afghanistan, Pakistan, Maldives, India, Srilanka, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Nepal - SAARC in a deadlock situation due to Pakistan (brings up bilateral issues) - If good relation exist between India & pakistan it's beneficial to both, however they don't cooperate they lose in a big way. Good relations with India means Pakistan military lose its relevance, hence the distance. BIMSTEC - Members: Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Srilanka, Thailand, Bhutan, Nepal - Founded in 1997 - Represents 1.5 bn people & combined GDP $3.5 trillion. - PROJECTS: kaladan multi modal project & IMT trilateral highway - CHALLENGE: ability to deliver on projects: timelag, comparison to china: quick delivery - STEPS: MEA engaging with PRAGATI model bring: timely implementation - Countries are wary of China - Big but not benign - always China looks for its own interests Hambantota Port is gone from Srilanka due to indebtedness Hence, Countries look for India's engagement. India's Foreign policy: - Neighbor first: 2014 invited SAARC leaders, in 2019 invited BIMSTEC leaders. - Promoting BIMSTEC as a bridge between SAARC & ASEAN - 3C: Connectivity, Commerce & Culture - ASEAN Way Ahead: - UK model: to implement what PM has said by forming a body & giving them administrative & financial independence. - Not competing with China on Commercial enterprises rather focusing on our strength. - Broad based meetings: Culture - soft power. - Timely & quality delivery: Delhi Metro was before time - Accepting the reality that Pakistani s a troubled relationship but being open to them once they are willing to cooperate. We have investments in Afghanistan & pakistan is a key player there. India has a constructive engagement with its neighbours. While it's push for BIMSTEC is commendable but BIMSTEC & SAARC are complementary in the region. India has moved from look east policy to act east policy & Indo - pacific cooperation through its diaspora, culture & connectivity which has garnered tremendous goodwill in the region.
As quoted by Maj. Gen. Dhruv C Katoch Sir, a friendly relations with Pakistan will definitely benefit both India and Pakistan. And if the relations with Pakistan become as India as with Bangladesh then there would be a huge economic development or growth for the Pakistan economy but since it does take some effective measures in curbing the terrorism and other issues the realtions get worsen with the country. India's Act East Policy, have again rejuvenated BIMSTEC and Indian government is trying it's level best to take this organisation to extreme level. The various government projects such as Kalidan project and others and increased the neighbour cooperation in every field. As it was mentioned by one of the panelists BIMSTEC act as a bridge between SAARC and ASEAN. This policy will benefit the Indian Economy and India's stand at the global market. Another view point which can be drawn from discussion is the now with such an huge growing economy India has now got the denial power, if we look in the past due to slow growth rate of economy certain measures were taken which didn't benefit to India to greater extent. On the final note as said we cannot boycott Pakistan or chamge the change the geography. Our co-operation with the neighbour countries will strengthen our relations and the steps which would be taken up by NDA-II would be crucial in determining our diplomatic relations with others.
What is most important to us, is that BIMSTEC be renamed to define more of a global/regional grouping; An acronym *AARC* which stands for "Asian African association for Regional Cooperation" comes to mind. So BIMSTEC should be renamed as *AARC*, which is completely apt, since BIMSTEC nations anyway form an "Arc of protection of Africa and Asia", from the Seas onwards. Secondly, *AARC* (Or BIMSTEC) should open the invitation for Mauritius, Seychelles, Maldives, Kenya, Afghanistan, Cambodia, Singapore, Brunei, Indonesia, Vietnam and Malaysia to join, since all these nations are dependent on the sea, air and land lanes passing around the Bay of Bengal and through Indian Ocean. So it only makes sense that these nations also participate in this grouping, for the betterment of all Asian people of these regions. Thirdly, there should also be a defence/security component to this grouping; It can start with joint military exercises and anti-piracy/terrorism initiatives, and move on to defence technology, outer-space defence (i.e. Launching of satellites, joint space missions, etc), and a common military/economic headquarters like how NATO or NORAD have.
@john doe yeah the infrastructure may not be able to cope up with a summit of kind where head of states come together But atleast a foreign Secretariat level summit in some already existing big hotel in Andaman and Nicobar ,bcoz A&N is centre of BIMSTEC and it is high time we utilise Andaman Nicobar effectively
BIMSTEC is a bridge between SAARC and ASEAN Pak has to do opposite what India does Pak is not only country that left in BIMSTAK,aphganistan also Only 4 meeting by BIMSTAK in 22 years Commitment and delivery! China issue in South Asia China(single ruling party and bigger then india) deliver fast then India on what committed PM gets a big mendet (303 seat),hope positive
Well I'm not actually in course with what army general said as it has stated by world Bank that India pak has 40+ b$ trade capacity and India 🇮🇳 will have the upper hand in trade and also we will get the access to central Asia through pok..... But the current situation doesn't support trade relations with pak... So it is wrong to say that trade with pak is not beneficial...
Gagse nhr geror nhr jela mnpure postgagse ke nhr ka pane of keya jay dhan pk ga h pane bhut bhrah dhan sd jayg nhr ka pane bnd keya jay of of of hot fr p on asked on hot nhr gagse of
![[TH] 2024 PMGC League | Survival Stage วันที่ 1 | PUBG MOBILE Global Championship](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FVFT-PFwU80/mqdefault.jpg)
SAARC:
- Members: Afghanistan, Pakistan, Maldives, India, Srilanka, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Nepal
- SAARC in a deadlock situation due to Pakistan (brings up bilateral issues)
- If good relation exist between India & pakistan it's beneficial to both, however they don't cooperate they lose in a big way.
Good relations with India means Pakistan military lose its relevance, hence the distance.
BIMSTEC
- Members: Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Srilanka, Thailand, Bhutan, Nepal
- Founded in 1997
- Represents 1.5 bn people & combined GDP $3.5 trillion.
- PROJECTS: kaladan multi modal project & IMT trilateral highway
- CHALLENGE: ability to deliver on projects: timelag, comparison to china: quick delivery
- STEPS: MEA engaging with PRAGATI model bring: timely implementation
- Countries are wary of China - Big but not benign - always China looks for its own interests
Hambantota Port is gone from Srilanka due to indebtedness
Hence, Countries look for India's engagement.
India's Foreign policy:
- Neighbor first: 2014 invited SAARC leaders, in 2019 invited BIMSTEC leaders.
- Promoting BIMSTEC as a bridge between SAARC & ASEAN
- 3C: Connectivity, Commerce & Culture - ASEAN
Way Ahead:
- UK model: to implement what PM has said by forming a body & giving them administrative & financial independence.
- Not competing with China on Commercial enterprises rather focusing on our strength.
- Broad based meetings: Culture - soft power.
- Timely & quality delivery: Delhi Metro was before time
- Accepting the reality that Pakistani s a troubled relationship but being open to them once they are willing to cooperate.
We have investments in Afghanistan & pakistan is a key player there.
India has a constructive engagement with its neighbours. While it's push for BIMSTEC is commendable but BIMSTEC & SAARC are complementary in the region.
India has moved from look east policy to act east policy & Indo - pacific cooperation through its diaspora, culture & connectivity which has garnered tremendous goodwill in the region.
you will clear upsc this time
Impressive answer writing...... Will u guide me in writing answers 🙏
@@suffiakhanam5650 although, I dont feel qualified yet but I can help in whatever way I can.
very helpful
@@shashiketan so help me in writing sch a materialistic answer☺️
Only non-partisan and sane news channel. Hats off to host Mr. FR Pereira for making sure that decorum is maintained.
Good wishes for upsc Aspirants
Saarc and bimstec has been most confusing one. Thanks to this show, quite clear now.
This is meditating in knowledge 😌😌😌
As quoted by Maj. Gen. Dhruv C Katoch Sir, a friendly relations with Pakistan will definitely benefit both India and Pakistan. And if the relations with Pakistan become as India as with Bangladesh then there would be a huge economic development or growth for the Pakistan economy but since it does take some effective measures in curbing the terrorism and other issues the realtions get worsen with the country. India's Act East Policy, have again rejuvenated BIMSTEC and Indian government is trying it's level best to take this organisation to extreme level. The various government projects such as Kalidan project and others and increased the neighbour cooperation in every field. As it was mentioned by one of the panelists BIMSTEC act as a bridge between SAARC and ASEAN. This policy will benefit the Indian Economy and India's stand at the global market. Another view point which can be drawn from discussion is the now with such an huge growing economy India has now got the denial power, if we look in the past due to slow growth rate of economy certain measures were taken which didn't benefit to India to greater extent. On the final note as said we cannot boycott Pakistan or chamge the change the geography. Our co-operation with the neighbour countries will strengthen our relations and the steps which would be taken up by NDA-II would be crucial in determining our diplomatic relations with others.
One of the best, peaceful and well understandable debate.
Very well explained
What is most important to us, is that BIMSTEC be renamed to define more of a global/regional grouping; An acronym *AARC* which stands for "Asian African association for Regional Cooperation" comes to mind. So BIMSTEC should be renamed as *AARC*, which is completely apt, since BIMSTEC nations anyway form an "Arc of protection of Africa and Asia", from the Seas onwards.
Secondly, *AARC* (Or BIMSTEC) should open the invitation for Mauritius, Seychelles, Maldives, Kenya, Afghanistan, Cambodia, Singapore, Brunei, Indonesia, Vietnam and Malaysia to join, since all these nations are dependent on the sea, air and land lanes passing around the Bay of Bengal and through Indian Ocean. So it only makes sense that these nations also participate in this grouping, for the betterment of all Asian people of these regions.
Thirdly, there should also be a defence/security component to this grouping; It can start with joint military exercises and anti-piracy/terrorism initiatives, and move on to defence technology, outer-space defence (i.e. Launching of satellites, joint space missions, etc), and a common military/economic headquarters like how NATO or NORAD have.
I Dream of a BIMSTEC summit in Andaman & Nicobar island with minimal damage to the fragile ecosystem of A&N
@john doe yeah the infrastructure may not be able to cope up with a summit of kind where head of states come together
But atleast a foreign Secretariat level summit in some already existing big hotel in Andaman and Nicobar ,bcoz A&N is centre of BIMSTEC and it is high time we utilise Andaman Nicobar effectively
Respetedsirbimstecsabmitiamjoinintheapoinmentplaiecandsightfinalinformationdeclaredtrupointhisapoinmenrthankyousomachsir
Dhruv sir is awesome
Very very helpful thank you so much
Bold step must be true.
If not such then make rajpal yadav PM
Thanks rstv
Why India is all the time concerned about Pakistan, leave them?
BIMSTEC is a bridge between SAARC and ASEAN
Pak has to do opposite what India does
Pak is not only country that left in BIMSTAK,aphganistan also
Only 4 meeting by BIMSTAK in 22 years
Commitment and delivery!
China issue in South Asia
China(single ruling party and bigger then india) deliver fast then India on what committed
PM gets a big mendet (303 seat),hope positive
Well I'm not actually in course with what army general said as it has stated by world Bank that India pak has 40+ b$ trade capacity and India 🇮🇳 will have the upper hand in trade and also we will get the access to central Asia through pok..... But the current situation doesn't support trade relations with pak... So it is wrong to say that trade with pak is not beneficial...
Waaah modiji waah
This is not the edition of india's world but this is Big picture.#frank
Wov super
General stole the programme at 8 :15
Plz provide subtitle.
BIMSTEC countries 👍 monitoring every month. Accept bad relationship👍 Deal with Afghanistan
Jai Hindu rashtra
👍
I think time constrained...time should be more for elaboration.
Call happymon jacob from jnu
Jnu donkey
Daily ka to show nahi karta...5 din 1 week 2 week 1 month late ka show karta h...
Creating videos only in hindi is not a good idea..pls consider south also..we also hv ias aspirants nationalist.etc
Got you point
Jay Maharashtra.......♨️
@@reconquistahinduism346 💯
Jnu products are frustrated
Rstv walo hindi midium walo ka dhayn to rako
Gagse nhr geror nhr jela mnpure postgagse ke nhr ka pane of keya jay dhan pk ga h pane bhut bhrah dhan sd jayg nhr ka pane bnd keya jay of of of hot fr p on asked on hot nhr gagse of