How entangled black holes create Einstein-Rosen bridges | ER=EPR | Leonard Susskind

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ส.ค. 2024
  • Excerpts from Leonard Susskind's lecture on ER=EPR given at University of California, Santa Barbara
    Lecture date: August 20, 2013
    00:00 Funny anecdote about Sidney Coleman
    00:45 Insight into making progress in theoretical physics
    01:40 Thermofield double states as descriptions of entangled black holes
    05:40 Schwinger pair creation of black holes in electric fields
    07:13 Bridging black holes by coalescing Schwinger pairs
    08:15 Entangling black holes using entangled bell states
    09:10 ER=EPR Conjecture
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 83

  • @soumyaadhikari9842
    @soumyaadhikari9842 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Why this video does not have thousands of view where Public drama got millions of view.Why the comments section is not flooded.People really aren't curious in deep sense.

    • @jeevans1194
      @jeevans1194 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      SOUMYA ADHIKARI calm down

    • @soumyaadhikari9842
      @soumyaadhikari9842 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jeevans1194 😁

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      WHY ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS UNIFIED AND BALANCED WITH/AS WHAT IS GRAVITY:
      Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are LINKED AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, Einstein's equations and Maxwell's equations are unified (given the addition of a fourth spatial dimension); AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma; AS TIME DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, Einstein's equations predict that SPACE is expanding OR contracting in and with TIME; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.)
      Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
      Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. THE SUN purely exemplifies time DILATION. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!!
      The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Let's compare this directly with BOTH a falling object AND the speed of light (c). Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. Ultimately and truly, TIME is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The ultimate unification of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND includes opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. It ALL makes perfect sense. THINK !!!
      The Earth that undergoes time DILATION IS thus represented (ON BALANCE) as what is A POINT in the night sky, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (So, notice that the BLUE SKY IS no longer visible. Think.) E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is FULLY proven. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Alas, the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. I have truly, CLEARLY, AND MATHEMATICALLY unified physics/physical experience. OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. (Notice the black space of THE EYE, AND the DOME of a person's eye is ALSO visible.) THE EARTH is ALSO blue. Again, E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Time dilation proves that E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma, AS electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
      By Frank DiMeglio

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Susskind doesn't really understand physics.

    • @gamerdio2503
      @gamerdio2503 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@frankdimeglio8216 Capitalizing random words doesn't make you smarter

  • @akhuinnet
    @akhuinnet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Confusion s always good... Tnx for the enlightenment

  • @haz1788
    @haz1788 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    2:25 suuure I knew that. 🤯

  • @alexokin6819
    @alexokin6819 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This episode kind of plays out like a PhD soap opera. Prof Susskind asks class in beginning to not interrupt like Sidney Coleman did unless they are a Sidney Coleman level or higher. (spongebob voice) 10 minutes later - Suss explains the Einstein Rosen bridge, and the mysterious interrupter tells some stupid joke and one person laughs setting off a primal group response, invoking laughter in a segment of the crowd. This was the mysterious man's class for those 10 seconds. I wonder what Suss will do to get back at mystery man in next episode of Science Wars

  • @Ignominal
    @Ignominal 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm not a theoretical physicist by any spaghettification of the imagination, but I have a series of questions. Do we know black holes are or are not inherently an entanglement of sorts, specifically the timeframe spanning the beginning to the end of disentanglement? A black hole is basically a collapsed star, correct? So, maybe that spacetime collapse also begins the collapse of its entanglement? Collapsing entanglement results in a splitting of the previously entangled spacetime until two separate spacetime exist. What if the wormhole is the narrow band that emerges as disentanglement splits the entangled spacetime into two separate spacetimes? If that is true, then perhaps the Hawking radiation consists of particles sucked in by the oppositely entangled black hole that are entangled with the partucles sucked in by the black hole spewing the Hawking radiation and vice-versa?

  • @andreadelgaldo8609
    @andreadelgaldo8609 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    what is the name of the conjecture at minute 8.55? Can someone give me some references?
    Thanks in advance

    • @alex_romancino
      @alex_romancino ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it's the ER = EPR that he is talking about

  • @oguzhan2393
    @oguzhan2393 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ok we are seeing blackholes, why we dont see white holes. Lights should go out from somewhere. I wish that, we could create a small blackout for research.

  • @williamozier918
    @williamozier918 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In this model do the heavily entangled black holes have to have the same mass/spin/charge? Do differences in these effect entanglement? Does the expansion of the universe mean effect the entanglement?

    • @4inaftermath454
      @4inaftermath454 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Depends if it’s stable then yes, if not then no and you would require some exotic matter to stablize it

    • @targeted-individualdallas-9963
      @targeted-individualdallas-9963 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Negative energy requirements equate to exotic matter to host the bridge open from the inside -e=-mc^2

    • @williamozier918
      @williamozier918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@4inaftermath454 I think I understood that! Thanks!

    • @brendawilliams8062
      @brendawilliams8062 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Didn’t tiles take the problem on too.

  • @MuggsMcGinnis
    @MuggsMcGinnis 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where's the rest of the talk? It just ends at 12:39?

  • @Rajabbuttlive1234
    @Rajabbuttlive1234 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Joules energy to open the unseen portals of black holes

  • @buyiphilip
    @buyiphilip ปีที่แล้ว +1

    if you are into the spirit world, this will make everything make sense.

    • @Zenovarse
      @Zenovarse ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Uh... It shouldn't...

    • @ben1210
      @ben1210 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unless the spirit is whisky

  • @mediummusic6817
    @mediummusic6817 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is what the internet is for

  • @JeremiahLiend
    @JeremiahLiend ปีที่แล้ว

    Let's do it! Let's entangle some shit! I'm here for it!

  • @isaiah8577
    @isaiah8577 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So black holes are not impossible to escape past the event horizon?

    • @ryanhasmanners9997
      @ryanhasmanners9997 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You would not be able to escape the other end

    • @brendawilliams8062
      @brendawilliams8062 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A bridge. Does it have a sombrero on both sides. Hats up and up or down and down. Spinning in unisons. My. What a problem

  • @adelvoid1530
    @adelvoid1530 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome!

  • @aaronjennings8385
    @aaronjennings8385 ปีที่แล้ว

    The same black hole in two different places in spacetime?

  • @sobiaasif589
    @sobiaasif589 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    11:08 ooo lala

  • @aarongeorge2276
    @aarongeorge2276 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir could you teach me to make a real bridge?

  • @randomaccessfemale
    @randomaccessfemale 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    11:05 I love it when physicists talk dirty.

  • @alexokin6819
    @alexokin6819 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That initial sidney coleman story was a great kickoff to an otherwise standard theory of everything lecture. It is so interesting to see these brilliant minds absorb the information. We have an orange monster reeking havoc on a superpower and here we see a think tank of brainy theorizer in chiefs, sitting with angst in their UCal seats taking in what most of us know to be non-existent - the power of math being more satisfying to your amygdala for achieving higher levels of universal knowledge on the Maslow hierarchy, higher than any psychedelic or half decent mental breakthrough could ever garnish on your bequest - Hunter S. Thompson

    • @wintc
      @wintc ปีที่แล้ว +1

      📸 yup this one's going in the cringe collection

    • @ben1210
      @ben1210 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would have corrected your spelling on "reeking" to "wreaking" but he's just farted his way through a court appearance 👃🤮

  • @windigo000
    @windigo000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i understood P = 1 😁 not sure if i got the joke.

    • @radiowallofsound
      @radiowallofsound 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ER = EPR can be read as an algebraic notation, ( E times R equals E times P times R ) So P must be 1 in that expression. 🤓

  • @ben1210
    @ben1210 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm completely ignorant, be gentle with me. If there is quantum entanglement, could we imagine that on a different scale where it occurs on opposite (or adjacent) sides of a bridge. I'm not sure I'll be able to understand a reply, but I'd apprecite it if you could structure it simply

    • @ben1210
      @ben1210 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Looking at my question, I obviously haven't got a clue about physics or geometry, but I'd appreciate it if you could talk me through this like it's on kids TV 🙏

  • @rvgameking2758
    @rvgameking2758 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How and why do the black holes entangle?

    • @adamplentl5588
      @adamplentl5588 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Dragon FN I was pretty sure that the consensus was that spacetime is either flat or ever so gently curved.
      When you said that space is spherical did you that gravitic effects result in spherical objects in a vacuum?

    • @brendawilliams8062
      @brendawilliams8062 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why does 1 and 2 entangle

    • @Zenovarse
      @Zenovarse ปีที่แล้ว

      5:41 - 7:03

    • @Zenovarse
      @Zenovarse ปีที่แล้ว

      Watch the video

  • @waldwassermann
    @waldwassermann 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So basically... the meaning of life is love.

  • @frankdimeglio8216
    @frankdimeglio8216 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WHY ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS UNIFIED AND BALANCED WITH/AS WHAT IS GRAVITY:
    Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are LINKED AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, Einstein's equations and Maxwell's equations are unified (given the addition of a fourth spatial dimension); AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma; AS TIME DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, Einstein's equations predict that SPACE is expanding OR contracting in and with TIME; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.)
    Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
    Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. THE SUN purely exemplifies time DILATION. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!!
    The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Let's compare this directly with BOTH a falling object AND the speed of light (c). Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. Ultimately and truly, TIME is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The ultimate unification of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND includes opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. It ALL makes perfect sense. THINK !!!
    The Earth that undergoes time DILATION IS thus represented (ON BALANCE) as what is A POINT in the night sky, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (So, notice that the BLUE SKY IS no longer visible. Think.) E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is FULLY proven. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Alas, the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. I have truly, CLEARLY, AND MATHEMATICALLY unified physics/physical experience. OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. (Notice the black space of THE EYE, AND the DOME of a person's eye is ALSO visible.) THE EARTH is ALSO blue. Again, E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Time dilation proves that E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma, AS electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
    By Frank DiMeglio

    • @thinnspeaker6123
      @thinnspeaker6123 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      How did you come to this conclusion? About a year ago I got to the same conclusion because of the similarities between electric and gravitational fields. Their intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source.

    • @thattwodimensionalant4626
      @thattwodimensionalant4626 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How is E = mc^2 derived from
      F = ma? Care to show the mathematics?

    • @badmintongo4832
      @badmintongo4832 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thattwodimensionalant4626 No he won't simply because he's one of those ubiquitous, shenaniganal cranks who falsely claim they know everything. Just ignore these people.

    • @thattwodimensionalant4626
      @thattwodimensionalant4626 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@badmintongo4832
      That’s true. It’s a real shame that people who don’t even go through the education can make such claims. They don’t have the knowledge or skills needed to do anything other than talk, it’s the same with all of them.

    • @mudkip_btw
      @mudkip_btw 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thinnspeaker6123 welcome in 3 spatial dimensions brother

  • @wulphstein
    @wulphstein 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why black holes? Can we entangle two lumps of coal, atom by atom?

    • @abujabartheinsurgentstar206
      @abujabartheinsurgentstar206 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alexanderkunovszky7333 that or a longer way to get there but you would probably collapse it just by going through it unless you could stabilize it

    • @brendawilliams8062
      @brendawilliams8062 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m doing good to entangle1 and 2. Lol

  • @omvinodjadhav1484
    @omvinodjadhav1484 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think leonard sirs theory is right

    • @Mr_ST_720
      @Mr_ST_720 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tumhala kase mahiti

    • @omvinodjadhav1484
      @omvinodjadhav1484 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mr_ST_720 mazya vicharane hi gosht khup logical aahe ani scinence chya drishti konane mala barobar vaatte

  • @frankdimeglio8216
    @frankdimeglio8216 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Frank DiMeglio is the world authority on gravitation BY FAR. Susskind is not.

  • @Anigmus_
    @Anigmus_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What

  • @roadrunner9704
    @roadrunner9704 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    We humans doesn't even feel the force of the earth that circle around the sun because of the magnitute so never say never to a theory till it becomes reality.

  • @charliecats2056
    @charliecats2056 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like turtles.

  • @elicit6070
    @elicit6070 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whats tge point of learning this shit when theres no first hand prroof of wormholes and black holes are trillions of kms away

    • @ianmarshall9144
      @ianmarshall9144 ปีที่แล้ว

      you dont have to mate , but some of us would like a better explanation than the one offered up by the Arab goat herders ! One that adults have bothered to spend time and resources on , after all without the scientific revolution we wouldnt be communicating , going to hospitals for treatment , exploring the local universe , its the Homosapiens who are curious that seem to have improved the total knowledge of humanity .

    • @elicit6070
      @elicit6070 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ianmarshall9144Advancements just a little numbers game. the scientists who say they want to do all this shit don’t actually give a fuck about advancement. Its the personal perks that they get along with it. Its pretty laughable when you try to tell a buch of muppets who dont know the difference between XX and XY chromosomes to get on a ship and fly to mars.

    • @Mr_ST_720
      @Mr_ST_720 ปีที่แล้ว

      To every end n accomplishments how much distant it has always has a unmanifestable start. This very lecture is the early start for year of 2300 of first accomplishments.. if you do not understand the need of theoretical physics you are not suppose to be in this place.

    • @elicit6070
      @elicit6070 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mr_ST_720Dont appreciate the ad hominem mindset. I said it’s pointless learning about this shit because youl be dead before the real benefits from theoretical physics become a reality. To even study black holes your looking close to 1500+ years with light speed traversal. Not to mention the majority of the human population dont give a shit about interplanetary exploration. Those who do, don’t actually care about the future but only about the pay check they are going to get. Even if wormholes existed whats there to explore? Some plannet that has 1000m/s winds? Theres nothing out there cunt that anyones bothered to explore unless it comes with a massive paycheck