For musicians after hearing this piece 40 million times, most of which are no different from each other, hearing the piece here like this is just a musical playground.
@@paulmcmahon6275Same. But I don’t think it is some sort of arrangement. I think it just needed to be “a tempo” with the pace of the military to create atmosphere
Yes they did. It seemed to me that they played it forever…I really don’t directly remember anything except Chopin and the muffled drums. But they seemed to go on and on. We only had two channels on our TV so whichever channel you went to there was the drums
It was sped up because us Americans don’t do the 70 pace per minute funeral march so it was at normal marching speed. The pitch was also raised as well.
@@FrankDaBank25 isnt that how years are numbered aka after or before christ? What dont u get? Are u that thick?? Year 2023 after christ or year 2076528353 after christ, is that clear enough for you?
Haunting. I sat glued to the TV all day and even not a royalist, shed a silent tear as the queen's coffin was lowered. As a former British colony, we still have many laws and dress codes inherited by the British Empire and I absolutely love the pomp and circumstance.
I prefer this even to Beethoven's. It puts into music the pangs of grief in a way unrivaled. I was in London and Windsor to hear both for Her Majesty's funeral.
The Royal commentators talked through several bars of the London drill which was distracting for us TV viewers. However, as the coffin proceeded along the long walk to Windsor they became absolutely silent. The beat of the drums was magnificent. Tremulous...
When I was in the orchestra, we played this march much slower, always motionless. Maybe at such a slow pace it would be difficult to march to the beat.
Difference between your school band and these musicians are countless. They don't get months to practice, they're playing near enough every other day, different marches each time.
And of course everyone is holding a smartphone. I get that it is a big event but seems distasteful. Yes. It is in tv and internet anyway but I see a difference
@@caracowman3954 they really do. Look it up. Few years back there was a documentary where they were talking about preparations for the Queen's birthday party in the whole process that the guardsman go through and they were talking about how you're all sweaty and whatnot afterwards and from marching through the horse poop you have to get undressed get out of the sweaty clothes clean your boots pretty much immediately than get your shirt and what not to the laundry and the rest of the dress uniform cleaned up and stored
In fact, it was, in an orchestrated version. Not wished for by the dying Chopin, though. He never intended this piece to be a funeral march, it's a movement of his 2nd Sonata. He wished for Mozart's Requiem and got it. He was quoted from his deathbed: "Play Mozart and I will hear you!" They had trouble making it possible, the priests didn't approve (female voices were not permitted to sing in Cath. Churches in those days in France), but they managed in the end. Some of Chopins own music was played because some of his friends couldn't resist.
@@Dryhten1801 1. It has everything to do with the empire. 2. Yes. 3. What does the form of government has to do with the people's culture? 4. You mad, bro?
@@Niklas.the.13th. 1. No, it has nothing to do with the Empire. The actions carried out by the government of a constitutional monarchy rarely reflect the thoughts and opinions of the monarch, and even when they do, the monarch would never express their opinion. It's bizarre to assume that a funeral regarding the monarch of these nations has anything to do with the Empire. The Commonwealth Realms (members of the Commonwealth that retain the monarchy) do so purely by choice and not by any form of authoritarian connection to the United Kingdom. The territories of the United Kingdom retain status as British subjects also by choice---see the referendum results in the Falklands, for instance. There is no British Empire in the modern day---there is only a conglomeration of nations with shared histories that DECIDE to retain a connection even today. There is no valid reason for that to be torn down, given that the entire reason for it's existence is the people's will. 2. Yes, you're going to comment it on every video you see of British culture and then have no fair discourse because you don't want anyone to change your mind---you're far too close-minded for that. 3. The form of government may have been the cause of this event, but you're assuming that a) the form of government cannot affect popular culture and b) the constitutional monarchy does NOT affect the people's culture. That's just bizarre. Estimates range wildly, so I'm not going to quote tourist money from the Monarchy or anything, but even without that statistical evidence, it's pretty obvious that the Monarchy has had a profound effect on British culture---ask an American what the first thing they think of when they think of Britain and a large amount will say something regarding the monarchy. I believe it's what brought the whole culture of manners and tea and whatnot (though a large simplification of what British culture entails, at least it's not negative) to the world stage. It avoids a wholly negative view of Britain on the world stage. Anyhow, royal figures have had a great impact on the people's culture with their actions, words, and whatnot. 4. Yes. It is entirely reasonable to be mad when someone with a presumably subpar education regarding history, government, and politics makes a bold and unreasonable claim, is questioned on it, then refuses to elaborate anything beyond a few sentences that only further confusion. That's ridiculous.
![[[OFFICIAL MV]] เอิ้นขวัญให้อ้าย- อ๊ะอาย สกุณาพร | ค่ายเพลงเป็นหนึ่ง](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/83x6L3X3qh0/mqdefault.jpg)
Chopin has changed the world with this piece
I like this best.
O tak!! Polska ⭐🇵🇱
Yes!!!
@@dominika1247Poland plays piano🇵🇱
@wadahabbasher
In what way has Chopin changed the world with that exciting piece of music? I didn't see anyone dancing.
For musicians after hearing this piece 40 million times, most of which are no different from each other, hearing the piece here like this is just a musical playground.
This was the quickest I heard it played at a funeral.
@@paulmcmahon6275you should listen to the the US Navy band's rendition. We like it fast and loud
@@paulmcmahon6275Same. But I don’t think it is some sort of arrangement. I think it just needed to be “a tempo” with the pace of the military to create atmosphere
Man imagine being chopin watching a immortal being die and then hearing his masterpiece play
0:21 it sounds like the. Batman 2022 theme
@@kodesh1674it was based on funeral march
@@laytonrobinson-xChopin copied from batman ofc
@@mrmaxboypvp5097lmao 😂
The Chopin Funeral March was also played during JFK's funeral procession in 1963.
Yes they did. It seemed to me that they played it forever…I really don’t directly remember anything except Chopin and the muffled drums. But they seemed to go on and on. We only had two channels on our TV so whichever channel you went to there was the drums
Plus Leonid Brezhnev
It was sped up because us Americans don’t do the 70 pace per minute funeral march so it was at normal marching speed. The pitch was also raised as well.
@@NewEnglandFoamerThe JFK rendition seemed much darker and more somber which reflected the shock and gloom everyone felt
@@JUNE10215and Margaret Thatcher
This was the best part!!! Chopin is timeless even in year 2 billion after christ
2 billion? Wtf are you talking about 😂
@@FrankDaBank25 isnt that how years are numbered aka after or before christ? What dont u get? Are u that thick?? Year 2023 after christ or year 2076528353 after christ, is that clear enough for you?
lmao what
He means this will be this good, in the year 2 billion.
But why understand the comment when you can just berate him.
@@marcoeire44 But why know the human race will never survive this long?
The speed is really fast and changes the whole character of the piece.
Yes, but it still sounds mournful, and being played by a live marching band makes it very visceral I think.
i’m thinking that they’ve had to have practiced this piece for years, just in case. it was definitely intentional
The USA played it at JFK's funeral slower
Exactly very too fast. La rapidité fait perdre le ton de la cérémonie.
D’autant plus que leur pas n’est pas adapté au rythme. Dommage.
It's fast because the band has to march hence the music's tempo should be fast as well.
I actually like this piece. I want it played at my funeral.
All I can imagine is going back in time and showing this future tense to Chopin and showing him the impact he had on modern society
Haunting. I sat glued to the TV all day and even not a royalist, shed a silent tear as the queen's coffin was lowered. As a former British colony, we still have many laws and dress codes inherited by the British Empire and I absolutely love the pomp and circumstance.
I have never heard the whole funeral March besides the obvious part it’s a beautiful piece
This isn't the whole piece. It is much longer.
Still can't believe she's gone... May her spirit be with God.
My condolences to the British from America. It’s the least I can do after you played Star Spangled Banner for us the day after 9/11.
🇬🇧 🇺🇸
A haunting echo from almost 2 years ago. I remember that day like it was yesterday
It's still almost unbelievable she's gone
Everything and everyone does eventually fade away. Be it people or empires, eventually it’s gone, no matter how certain their existence was
I prefer this even to Beethoven's. It puts into music the pangs of grief in a way unrivaled. I was in London and Windsor to hear both for Her Majesty's funeral.
Death, the great equaliser.
Kings, Queens, Canons, Commoners, all will be dust in the end.
And yet man's will still endures thru the ages.
Thank you for posting this. I must have missed it.
The Royal commentators talked through several bars of the London drill which was distracting for us TV viewers. However, as the coffin proceeded along the long walk to Windsor they became absolutely silent. The beat of the drums was magnificent. Tremulous...
so sad to watch again, I sat all day on the day to watch it live.
Rest in peace, elizabeth.
You will be missed.
When I was in the orchestra, we played this march much slower, always motionless. Maybe at such a slow pace it would be difficult to march to the beat.
Even I feel if the tempo is halved but the march doesn't change, it would be epic.
Played during JFK, Brezhnev, queen Elizabeth funerals. Simply the most influential march ever composed by the french-polish compositeur
Polski kompozytor *
God save the Queen. Long Live the King.
We miss u Elizabeth II
I still tear up when I watch this.
Great piece of music ….really a somber tone….I wish I could have this played at my funeral procession lol
What is surprising to me, is that these musicians need lyres for the sheet music. We memorized everything we played in high school/university band.
They don't need them it is just part of the show and pageantry ,they could play with their eyes shut,all brilliant musicians.
Idiot it wasn’t expected
These bandsmen play hundreds of marches in a different order every time, and they are kept to a far greater standard than your school band.
Difference between your school band and these musicians are countless. They don't get months to practice, they're playing near enough every other day, different marches each time.
@@thegame2797 I get that, but the vast repertoire of music we were required to memorize, especially for university, just makes this look out of place.
At a speed appropriate for the occasion, it is a beautiful piece; and I appreciate the piece, and the occasion at which it is played.
0:46 now that was epic
R.I.P. Queen Elizabeth.
That one lone bell.....
Rip 😢
thank you
Long live the crown! Glory to the late queen. May all Gods blessings abound her
The world's only remaining empire culture.. Tudors
The Tudors are gone though?
@@sileikalaimonas yes you are right
And of course everyone is holding a smartphone.
I get that it is a big event but seems distasteful.
Yes. It is in tv and internet anyway but I see a difference
Just imagine how Difficult it would of been to stay in line but to also avoid horse Shit on the road
They actually march through it
They do not. Actually? Wtf?
@@caracowman3954 they really do. Look it up. Few years back there was a documentary where they were talking about preparations for the Queen's birthday party in the whole process that the guardsman go through and they were talking about how you're all sweaty and whatnot afterwards and from marching through the horse poop you have to get undressed get out of the sweaty clothes clean your boots pretty much immediately than get your shirt and what not to the laundry and the rest of the dress uniform cleaned up and stored
@@RabidNemo holy crap bro
They march straight through it.
Still feels mental that we have a King. It just doesn't feel right.
I was summoned
I wonder if this march was played at Chopin's funeral?
In fact, it was, in an orchestrated version. Not wished for by the dying Chopin, though. He never intended this piece to be a funeral march, it's a movement of his 2nd Sonata.
He wished for Mozart's Requiem and got it. He was quoted from his deathbed: "Play Mozart and I will hear you!"
They had trouble making it possible, the priests didn't approve (female voices were not permitted to sing in Cath. Churches in those days in France), but they managed in the end. Some of Chopins own music was played because some of his friends couldn't resist.
Brezniev version was better imo
A shame that the queen's death is yet another nail in the coffin of British national pride.
This is the funeral march par excellence
I like this slightly faster tempo version.
„na wieczny sen”
Stalin had the same piece and I will have it, too 😅
2:08 holy
more!
March should’ve been slower, but I suppose we live in times where everything has to be at a faster tempo.
00:46 🖤💥
2x is way better.
Only 2.8K?!?
No wonder I don’t like England.
She's on her way there
And we all thought that she was immortal
Played with suitable style, vim and vigour by the British military bands.
👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑
REINA
Polish Master.
Should be played with original tempo - more dignified.........
earth her nails!
Death is always the winner!
Very moving.
💔😥
😞😔
I’m proud🥹
Im from poland and im love queen elizabeth. Im just so proud because our polish music was played on queen funeral (sorry for my spelling error)
R.I.H.
you rest in hell
Thats how should it soud : th-cam.com/video/GTptfCtzwWk/w-d-xo.html
Sorella oi i didn't deserve harrased from Australia
Откуда эта скорость? Где торжественность? Уродство.
🧱♥️💋
Wagner is iconic
Beethoven
Down with the Crown. Viva Republic
The empire fell off for good
Long live the King!
@@twumwaa319ha kings coming to run your house....😅
Literally what has this to do with the empire? You gonna comment that on any video you see of British culture?
@@Dryhten1801 1. It has everything to do with the empire.
2. Yes.
3. What does the form of government has to do with the people's culture?
4. You mad, bro?
@@Niklas.the.13th. 1. No, it has nothing to do with the Empire. The actions carried out by the government of a constitutional monarchy rarely reflect the thoughts and opinions of the monarch, and even when they do, the monarch would never express their opinion. It's bizarre to assume that a funeral regarding the monarch of these nations has anything to do with the Empire. The Commonwealth Realms (members of the Commonwealth that retain the monarchy) do so purely by choice and not by any form of authoritarian connection to the United Kingdom. The territories of the United Kingdom retain status as British subjects also by choice---see the referendum results in the Falklands, for instance. There is no British Empire in the modern day---there is only a conglomeration of nations with shared histories that DECIDE to retain a connection even today. There is no valid reason for that to be torn down, given that the entire reason for it's existence is the people's will.
2. Yes, you're going to comment it on every video you see of British culture and then have no fair discourse because you don't want anyone to change your mind---you're far too close-minded for that.
3. The form of government may have been the cause of this event, but you're assuming that a) the form of government cannot affect popular culture and b) the constitutional monarchy does NOT affect the people's culture. That's just bizarre. Estimates range wildly, so I'm not going to quote tourist money from the Monarchy or anything, but even without that statistical evidence, it's pretty obvious that the Monarchy has had a profound effect on British culture---ask an American what the first thing they think of when they think of Britain and a large amount will say something regarding the monarchy. I believe it's what brought the whole culture of manners and tea and whatnot (though a large simplification of what British culture entails, at least it's not negative) to the world stage. It avoids a wholly negative view of Britain on the world stage. Anyhow, royal figures have had a great impact on the people's culture with their actions, words, and whatnot.
4. Yes. It is entirely reasonable to be mad when someone with a presumably subpar education regarding history, government, and politics makes a bold and unreasonable claim, is questioned on it, then refuses to elaborate anything beyond a few sentences that only further confusion. That's ridiculous.
I prever the soviets fot doing this not a country in the west !
음악이 아깝다