OJ25 Episode 21 - The TRUE Story of the OJ Simpson Trial (Court TV Docuseries)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ม.ค. 2021
- #ojsimpsontrial #ojsimpson #nicolebrownsimpson #rongoldman #truecrime #courttv #OJ25
More experts are called to testify about evidence such as a footprint found on an envelope and piece of paper at the crime scene and a happy phone conversation O.J. had the night of the murders; renowned forensic expert Dr. Henry Lee suggests there may have been more than one killer.
© 2020 Court TV Media LLC, part of The E.W. Scripps Company.
Amazing how so much of this trial had nothing to do with whether he killed 2 people.
Ito completely lost control of the trial. As poor a job as the prosecution did in many respects, Ito was even worse.
@@davidschlaefer8078
Except for all that evidence. But this wasn’t a trial about evidence or what it showed. It was about payback.
Who's leaving who's comments in 2024?
Me! 😂
Bruce fromong seems credible doesn’t he
Me
I guess detective Lange is an expert on everything excpet following police procedures and collecting evidence correctly.
Bruce, no blood on the glass? No blood in the sink ? No blood on the vanity? Must have been cleaning up a cut after the murders.
Just one stain on a face cloth. It doesn’t make sense.
If the shoe fits, you must convict
That doesn't rhyme
@@ksmith5325 you said the rhyme you did the crime
As we saw from the video shoe ( amd the evidence collection) didnt fit. Good thing too since we cant have all people with size 12 shoes, which is half the men I know, accused and tried for this crime.
@@QuatMan There was never any shoe ,knife or bloody clothing.
@@philipwilliams1754 Shush! Who cares about facts anymore?🤣 I have even seen Marcia Clark doing interviews where she lies about these details. I saw one where she lied and said there was a bloody footprint inside the bronco. And millinials are so unfamiliar with this case ( or anyone with extreme bias), that these details keep being missed. The Goldman Golddiggers keep rehashing the lies too, and are never challenged on Ron's drug connections. He was good looking after all!
As a white man, after listening to the testimony of all the people in his use of the N word I viewed Mark Furhmans appearance on this TV channel as a joke, he does not show remorse, just a blasè attitude to the whole situation and a kind of I am the scapegoat message / "woke culture got me fired because everyone else did this at the time too" fuck him. Was OJ guilty, more likely than not, but did Furhman see an opportunity to fix up a black man he assumed was gulity anyway DEFINITELY. So you reap what you sow justice system, it is unfortunate the families of the victims had to be in the crossfire
Nicole Brown Simpson, was a golddigger, cocaine addict, that kept the company of several men You reap what ya sow
Unfortunate for the Goldman"s
Ron Goldman, was a drug informant.
The incompetent actions, of this investigation, & careless actions of the prosecution won't tell you that Simpson is responsible
Cammo...the second this jury was picked the case was over.I rooted for OJ, because I have no respect for a golddigger or anyone in the Goldman family.That being said,black people suck bronco balls.
I can only agree. He's clearly coming off as a despicable narcissist without any remorse for what he said or the fact that the he helped in a huge way to torpedo this case!
I agree. He just LOOKS like that classic 80s and 90s halfway crooked lapd officer.
Listen, the double murderer showed no remorse…that was being tried, not this cop’s morals.
How did the jury pay their mortgages?
I’d be homeless for sure by the mid way of the trial.
Ito ordered the state to pay bills,also money for shopping and clothing.
How dare you assume they have mortgages
Mortgages were likely paid off already!
@@jonathanperry6302comments like this is why he got off
I think because it’s every American’s civil duty , the company you work for is required to continue your employee paycheck.
Worst prosecution team ever. They used the jury as a handy scapegoat.
The prosecution fucked up several times, but the jury IS to blame. Anyone and everyone who isn't a deceitful, dishonest idiot knows that OJ did it. The evidence was massive and overwhelming. If his bloody clothes and the murder weapon were found with him when the Bronco chase ended, that fucking idiot ass jury would have STILL concluded that he was framed. You have to be a fucking dumbass to be on that jury and not understand how plain it was that he was guilty.
@@slyjokerg That's because the defense used a top notch jury consultant where as Marcia refused to use one for the prosecution team 🤦
@@michaelhalterman8812 Lots of things went into it... prosecutorial mistakes, terrible rulings from the bench, a never ending trial itself, and on and on... but the fact remains that that jury was a gaggle of ridiculous morons that was racially driven and ignored the evidence.
@@slyjokerg Well said! 😔
@@slyjokerg The glove didn't fit,Fhurman lying,EDTA in the blood,Vannatter taking OJs blood to the crime scene.
That writer is crazy annoying and went out of her way to get some notoriety and asked him to be racist…she should be ashamed of herself
I must say. I saw a police woman during riots in London, get absolutely obliterated by a man. He literally picked her up, and threw her. Same man was brought down by a male police officer. I’m a woman, and I know I’m not as strong as a man, any day. That being said….women are invaluable as police officers. Especially for victims of abuse, sexual violence, etc.
common sense..............it could be a good partnership but when it is getting heated , a man would have way more power, that's the way it is, whatever we like it or not
Women are taught to argue with and poke at men now a days. Entitled women at least. 🤓
@@sethdavid2117 not just at men. Trust and believe there's more females out here who hate other women with a very strange passion. It's disgusting and disturbing. But I agree with you, unfortunately 😒😞
They shouldn’t be cops. They can’t keep up physically even with the weapons and tools. They’re weak
certain people do not want to admit to the reality and differences and shortcomings between the 2 genders
nowadays they want to believe in mermaids and unicorns
I feel like the word "upset" was a real problem during this trial. The meaning of upset is different for a lot of people. To some it can mean anger/hate etc. To others it can just mean sad/crying/depressed. It seemed like there was some confusion there at times.
I know. Poor Kato was given SO much crap from Marcia over the definition of "upset"!
Some jobs pay jury service
Yes dumb dumb. You use anything you can to prove your case. Right down to picking apart a word for translation. It’s how it goes in court. It’s a painful long process
@@Radiodaze1073”dumb dumb”? I hadn’t heard that since I was in elementary school. Very childish like. What are we six years old?
@@mrs.vhorton8045 yes. 6 and a half to be correct
Cops don’t rat out other cops
That’s a problem.
Wow ito Has some nerve saying the lawyers pondered to the cameras when that's exactly why the fame struck ito allowed cameras in proof being him allowing a trial to go 11 months. That's unheard of ! Trials take 3 weeks tops on ave for murder. He allowed way too much useless things in. The jury also for a lot of days when the lawyers constantly argued over every little issue esp by the defense. The sad part is in interviews after the trial 3 lawyers on ojs team believed he was guilty! So all their disputable tactics as every single thing pointed to oj. It's too bad they didn't do the leg work to prove oj owned Bruno maglis which was used & proved in the successful civil case. It's threatens to pull the cameras & admits they were a mistake near the end of a freaking year long trial but he doesn't. Then a huge mistake & legally their was no reason for ito to release all 42 excerpts of the furhman tapes where he let the jury only hear 2 excerpts.
He couldn't wait til after the trial to release them to the public? He hypicritcally says the lawyers played it up for the cameras b/c of the public yet he himself releases the tapes " for public interest " really. So u rule 2 are aloud in ^ during the trial u release them which incited the community more. Of course the release of those tapes got back to the jury through conjugal weekly visits ! Ito was a disgrace. No wonder that jury only deliberated for like an hour. They say out of the 3 or 4 hours they deliberated which has to be another record given how long this case was . 1 hour was lunch the other was it took an hour to sign & go through all the paperwork needed to put their verdict in. Initially the verdict was 10 -2. I don't know who the holdouts were. But b/c the other 10 juros wanted to go home as they were basically imprisoned themselves for a year. They were stuck in their hotel for 11 months! They weren't allowed to ever leave for fear they'd hear public opinion they had zero TV. Zero magazine papers zero calls. Good lord all they had was a weekly visit & movies rented & a couple field trips. What a jerk ito was to let this trial go on & on. As I said 11 months is unheard of. They had that dr " lucky " on the stand for a record 8 days ! Fung 4 days. So many witnesses were on the stand 2 days. That's crazy. When I was a kid I figured this was how long a murder trial takes place. As I got older I was shocked to read they only go weeks. I believe Simpsons civil trial went a couple months. They also were successful. I know the standard are lower for civil cases u only need a majority of the jury. So I think they had 9 jurors. If 5 vote liable that's enough. In criminal of course u need all 12 jurors that's a hung jury. When these jurors " deliberated " which they really didn't usually a verdict takes days. I Remember the media was stunned as were the lawyers as many were called back from their vacations. The jury got the case turned over to them & reports came in They made their decision by noon same day ! The reason ito scheduled for the verdict to be read the next day was so all the lawyers could be present. Shockingly as well w/ only 2 weeks to go ito wanted a 2 week intermission to go on a vacation he had planned b4 the trial! What a creep. To have been fine making a jury wait 2 weeks w/ zero to do was insane. They originally had like 20 alternates some purposely got themselves kicked off cause they couldn't take or afford to be held sequestered that long. Ito didn't Care that many of the jurors couldn't work their regular jobs to u know support their families. As a juror ur paid really low wages. I know by law u can't be fired if u get jury duty. But u also after a certain amt of time can't be paid from ur regular job making way more than the crappy money u get as a juror. I believe here in ny like 15 years ago my mom was on jury duty for 2 weeks & was paid like 20$ a day. I guess many of these jurors didn't have jobs cause as I said they can't be fired for jury duty but an employer can still replace u as they need to have the worker their. So some were let go so they could at least get unemployment. I thought the jurors sounded like dopes in their interviews but I do think it sux they were pretty much imprisoned for a year. Even prisoners get to watch TV & read the papers. Plus I can't imagine when they were at the trial how boring so much was. I got bored watching so many witnesses cause a lot is on yt. So many inane questions were asked as well. That's where the judhe is supposed to step in & say " where is the Lind of questioning going," or " make ur point quickly counsel " or move on counsel. The judhe can stop lines of questions going nowhere. That's why Marcia needed to get the d.a. explained easier to the jury. Like spoon fed. This was done in like 2 min to the jury in the Civil trial. They had one expert basically break it down for that jury to simply explain this is dna this is why it works & its 99.99999% correct. One dopey juror actually said " they said dna is 1 in a billion people but their are more than a billion people on earth " I mean how stupid is that logic? Yea the dna happend to match Simpson out of a billion people. A guy w/ a huge amount of circumstantial evidence & a proven wife beater who stalked Nicole. So some other person out of a billion people happened to match ojs dna ? Another dumb juror said " this is not a domestic violence case this is a murder case. U want to try d.v go to another court. Huh? So that connection to wife beating & murder by an enraged controlling ex husband couldn't have escalated to murder tk this lady ? That's akin to obesity or being heavy has nothing to do w/ food.
Judge ito: “That causes me to believe the lawyers are pandering to the cameras” hahah. ok buddy…hypocrisy much? 😂🥴
What's with the "much" to end the comment? Rediculous
@@johnnycash1365 what’s with you commenting on something so minor and irrelevant you went out your way when you could’ve just kept scrolling 😂😂 people really do say some annoying shit
@@johnnycash1365 it’s “ridiculous”. And, she was saying “hypocrisy much?” And, you are being obtuse if you are claiming you don’t understand what she means.
@@pommiebearsexactly..and don't listen to Johnny cash..he can't spell ridiculous
Johnny's mad at the judge that he begged to keep! haha
Shiiiiit OJ was white until this trial
Doesn't make him a killer
No, for them he was a N..ger with lot of Money.
Jurors should have been allowed to sit in a room with one-way mirrors so they could have complete privacy from witnesses, the attorneys, the media and the public, while themselves being able to observe reactions from everyone else
The night of the murder , what was the detectives doing at OJ house , they had no business being there,? OJ was not a suspect yet and that alone they didn’t explain but saying they expected finding 2 bodies at his house and that’s just not a good reason
@@qalba3016 they DID explain it, quite well, in fact they have and still have witnesses galor proving what they claim to every last detail oh and they only lived a few mins apart from each other, they treated it as a possible crime IN progress, read more, it’s all there
@@respectdawildo_danjones508 Furhman was there first.
@@respectdawildo_danjones508 You'll never get through to some of these dullards. It's like talking to Holocaust deniers.
@@jimreily7538 Exactly. Like any people who cling to a conspiracy theory: there is nothing you can put in front of them that will change their mind.
''Julie nose job'' is getting muted by me every time she comes on the screen. Lange is next.
17:51 in my opinion this was irrelevant because a lot of times I cut my hand on glass, Blood was never on the glass.
I would have immediately dismissed Fuhrman as a witness.
Glad Fhurman testified,or he would've continued framing,maiming and murdering.
They tried.At the prelim hearing,Clark didn't ask Fuhrman about the gloves.Shapiro notified the Judge if the gloves were not introduced here,we will fight to prevent them from coming in the criminal trial.Fhurman was recalled,he testified I saw them.The rest is history.
@@philipwilliams1754 there was no framing. The blood in the car only got their one way and it couldn’t have been planted.
@@darbyohara The blood in the Bronco was found in August,all 7/10th of a drop.
@@philipwilliams1754 no it wasn’t. It was seen the morning after the murders when police could see into the bronco windows. It wasn’t tested until later
.................................................... Chicago airport has no surveillance where the trash cans sat ? No video cameras ? That's odd .
I thought he brought the evidence back to LA and handed it off to Rob Kardashian.
@@philipwilliams1754 He can't be that stupid
@@RychAhlberg That's what was stated.
Honestly, in retrospect it would've been best if cameras would NOT have been allowed, despite OJ's fame and notoriety.
On the one I hand I agree with you for a fair and accurate trial but on the other hand I think the people (as in the American people, the country, not the prosecution the people lol) have a right to know. It is true freedom of the press, or otherwise known as freedom of speech.
@@briannawaldorf8485 Bazillions of trials are still conducted without being televised. There is no need for any trial to be televised. If I was a judge who was in the position to make such decisions, no trial over which I presided would ever be televised. It is off the charts inappropriate. The press has access to any and all trials. There is no need to broadcast it.
@@briannawaldorf8485 Brilliant,we would never see the glove not fitting.
wrong. there was 1 camera
Laura McKinney has had a lot of success in film. Lol. We all sat in coffee shops in LA in the 90's writing our 'novel' or our 'big screenplay '. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
What a joke.
What the jury went through i wasnt surprise when one of them had a meltdown i would too if i had go through that they were treated like your aversge immate at the county jail 😢😢😢😢😢
Am I crazy or is Tom also Grandpa Joe from the original Charlie and the Chocolate factory?!
ur crazy
@@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821 look again, I'm quite sane.
how many hours of mark furhman tapes were played?
I think they only played a few snippets of the tape to the jury.
the jury already were set on a verdict not guilty from the first day they step in the courthouse.
One of the black jurors was a member of the black panther movement......the other 7 black jurors were bias and racist against white people....they were never going to convict OJ not even if they saw him committing the crimes
They knew the truth from day one. OJ was NOT GUILTY!!! All the planting of evidence and mistakes of the LAPD, LAPD criminalist proved the jury was correct.
I doubt that. #whoisaware The Dream Team just worked their case better than the prosecutors. ❤️✌🏼✊🏽🤷🏽♀️😎
I like juror #6. I'm very surprised he didn't find a publisher for his notes. He is articulate and thoughtful. Three of the female jurors collaborated on a book but from what I've heard, his notes are just as good if not better.
The publishers had to go with the female jurors books or they would had cried to peta , madd and all kinds of womens activists groups
@@AR-zm8kd PETA? They were human beings who happened to be females, not ANIMALS. Maybe you're trying to be jocular but keep your bloody misogyny to yourself, dude.
He is an asshole who looked for any tiny thing to justify a predetermined "Not guilty". His notes you think so much of reveal this. He is a shitbag.
@@AR-zm8kd Peta isnt a womans activist group lmao
@@kanyebreast6072 i ddnt say it was. I said peta. Madd. AND all kinds of WAGs
Of course OJ did it, and I empathize and sympathize deeply with the victims. But it frustrates me to hear the Goldmans attack the defense for doing their job -- and a good one -- and then praise the prosecution and cops who presented a HORRIBLE case that they kept saying was airtight as the defense opened up one massive hole after another -- and these were BIG HOLES in their case. They couldn't even find the Magli shoes photo that Petrocelli found in the civil trial. The Goldmans and Browns should be angry at the police and prosecution for being both incompetent and clumsy at best, and corrupt at worst. Notice, Lange's response to every defense argument is "oh, it's nonsense, garbage..." Sorry, but it's not nonsense - failing to wear gloves while collecting DNA evidence, or a police officer with a history of violent racism and a hatred of interracial couples finding the glove etc.
As a former cop, I would like to clear something up. I watched this trial and remember being absolutely positive that Mark Furman was racist and would absolutely plant evidence to jam someone like OJ Simpson up if he had the opportunity. I always felt the glove found behind Kato's apartment on OJ's property was planted. Furman wondering off on his own and finding the most compelling piece of evidence in this case is shady as hell. Also, when they found the glove, nothing around it looked disturbed like someone had been crashing around back there when they dropped it. It was argued the killer dropped this glove. The killer would have been covered in the victim's blood, tired, possibly injured and they left no blood or disturbed anything as they moved around back there enough to drop a glove. Then Furman gets back on the stand at the end of the trial and asserts his 5th amendment privilege lmao. He got caught lying, was outed as racist, and in my opinion was the reason OJ was found not guilty. It's too bad everyone cannot fight for their freedom like OJ was able too because too many cops get away with shit like this on a regular basis and it's sad.
I don’t even know where to begin with this nonsensical reply. Let’s just speak open and plainly without trying to build cases to defend opinions or gut feelings!!
OJ is f guilty as f--!!!!
He got away with murder because he’s rich!! End of story!! If you want to tell me hey he was found innocent in a court of law not only are you a fool!! Your painting yourself in a corner. The “ courts” found the cops who blatantly beat the shit out of Rodney King innocent! Can they both be true??
You have to check yourself of exactly why you need to believe that a clear cut easy!!!! Case of murder is somehow tainted!!
Be a human stop believing BS
If this actually happened, where the fuck was the police department ousting this alleged racist behavior in 85 or 90?
@@darbyohara I’m sorry I don’t understand.
@@sgoody334 if furman was planting evidence and being a racist why didn’t the lapd see and do something about it in 85 or in 90 long before the oj trial
@@darbyohara the 2 subjects are not attached. They had a massive race problem there with a lot of the police force. The world has changed so much over the last 50-60 years so a discussion on racism in the police force is one topic. The OJ murder trial is another! 2 completely different subjects. A lot of people only wanted to see him found innocent because of their experience with the police.
A good lawyer or 4!! Can make any argument sound ligament but the facts are the facts. Listening to lawyers say if OJ this super popular guy can’t find justice what hope does the average man have. That is so stupid and purposeful!! Give those average people your services along with the other lawyers there and see how the cases go
Damn the jury being locked away for so long I bet some of them lost their jobs. It's not like the court is gonna hand them another one after the trial.
nope, drunkard. did u bother to use ur brain before commenting?
they are not allowed, by FRICKIN LAW, to be fired for jury duty. ever. that is automatic fine and potential jail sentence for the boss
Bet most were welfare
@@johnnycash1365 probably and unemployment
@@johnnycash1365 Probably not, because most of them were black. The major majority of people on welfare in this country are white.
@Carrie's Beauty Reviews You do realize, that the major majority of people on welfare, look a lot like you ?
Watching this back I realize there were two separate trials happening inside the courtroom:
1. The People vs. OJ aka the murder trial which the prosecution was trying.
2. The African-American community vs. the LAPD which is what Johnnie was trying.
As I’ve heard before, Marcia put OJ on trial. Johnnie put the whole system on trial.
If you want to blame anyone, blame Ito because he allowed it and didn’t stop some of the absurd defense connections they were insinuating.
OJ was not “found innocent”. Stop. Bad. No. OJ’s lawyers tried their case better than the prosecution did.
I agree with everything except the assertion that the defense was better than the prosecution. Based on later interviews, that jury had no intention of convicting OJ Simpson.
Exactly right.
You're innocent until proven guilty 🤷🏾♂️ don't know why that's even up for debate at this point.
Why didn’t Darden make Clark cross examine the screenplay?!
Darden make Clark? LOL. Clark was the lead prosecutor.
Dr Erwin Golden did the original autopsy ,testified two knives were used.
Really?
@@andrerobinson2923 Yes.
@@philipwilliams1754 And? One killer can use 2 knives.
@@kanyebreast6072 Brilliant,so the victims stand while the killer,changes knives.???
No he didn’t, he said it was possible
Tom Lang the perfect example of a cop who does not believe anything other than his opinion or gut
I mean, not really. He’s just straight forward. Unless evidence proves otherwise. Evidence directs him to his opinion
@@SethMacLeod95 your opinion is wrong then....Lange would not give a inch even on things that we know were bs....he said as recently as of 2018 that the cops in the Rodney King tape did nothing wrong and didn't use excessive force, clearly that's him thinking as a cop first and only....same approach he and Vanhatter took in the case
Naw youre wrong. Lange is an amazing detective
They can get tunnel vision sometime.....but considering the fact OJ's blood was at the crime scene and the victim's blood was in his car & home.....so what if he did? They charged the right guy. (And should have gotten a conviction.)
Exactly. He swears his opinion is the only one and everyone should take it as fact lol otherwise it’s “b.s.”
DEAR OJ SIMPSON
everybody in this case made millions just from there side of the story. even furhman
His motive for planting the evidence and snitching him self out to the reporters.
Dr. Henry Lee ? Wow, this guy is not a clown from the FB! with a Liberal Art degree
He made mistakes though, and didn’t finish testifying. Try and find cross examination of Dr Lee in this case. He left before the prosecution could ask him anything lol.
@@pommiebears Lee pointed out the blood on the sock had soaked through to the third side.He also testified about the Bundy drops not having any cast off between.A lense of the glass had a finger print in blood on it,disappeared.
If the "shoe" print on the envelope is not in blood.
It could have come from anywhere at any time.
Well what would it be in, if not blood? Soil?
It may take a week or more to get through all of these OJ25 (over 40 minutes long) videos! How many of these videos are there?
Not sure i originally thought it would only be a 10 or 12 part series, and much to my (pleasant) surprise the episodes just seem to keep coming lol
@@raymondstantz3069 That's alright; I had already watched them all. I think there were over 20 episodes in all. Maybe about 25 in total.
@Neel1567 That explains it. Thx.
It was intended to be 37 episodes since the trial lasted 37 weeks, but then COVID happened. I’m guessing they had to cut down the number of episodes to 25.
@Neel1567 I thought the Oj25 was because it was 25 years later. I don’t know when they actually aired but 25 years from the Not Guilty verdict would have been October 2020…
That MAW sounds like something off of Married with Children.
Hold up...Dardan at the start of the case..said the N word is offensive and inflammatory and the jury shouldn't be subject to its use in court. Cochrane said that black ppl are subject to racism every day and that if the word drives the point home then the jury should be presented with it....and now Dardan is down playing it...I understand he has to bc of the stance the prosecution is taking...just a note I kept in mind.
Darden was saturated with Glue, he just refused to stick. The defense gave the prosecution the complete business.
what was played in court of mark furhman
18:50 tom lang wonderland?
34:40 yes Henry Lee just say what ever you paid him. He is a doctor expertise yes but he was years later in the stair case murder trail for the defense too and told also a stor to cause doubt. In that trail a book came up that was signed by Henry lee to a police officer. So I can believe he wa on good terms with many law officers and know he has to tell something it was expected. I think the prosecution in that case of that Oj can’t buy expertise like doctor Henry lee. It’s not that he is that much better than some other experts but his name and like the women told earlier in this episode he was worldly known and that’s must have an impact on the jury or people on general.
O so the defense experts just say whatever they are paid for, but the state experts who work for the state their entire life don't?
@@hernandayolearyallda THANK YOU
Looks like a shoe print to me. The prosecution just couldn't admit they were wrong. Guilty or not it didn't happen the way they say it happened.
Yeah the prosecution really shit the bed with this case... originally i thought the jurors were mistaken with their verdict back in the day, but after watching this as well as other documentaries on this case- it’s impossible to say that the prosecution proved their case beyond reasonable doubt. Their work was a sloppy mess from the get go. Yes i understand people make mistakes but Jesus lol.
100% I personally think he did it only because of his post trial interviews but like if I was a juror I’d have to vote not guilty! They absolutely fucked their case up with sloppy police work and racist cops. And they under estimated the defence because they’re used to trying murders where the defendant doesn’t have the money for a good defence like OJ did. It really shows a hole in the legal system in the inequality and how many people go with out good defence lawyers because they can’t afford them
Lange had his eyes only set on Simpson based on his initial contact with Denise brown and suggested this in an interview and Vannatta admitted to the same attitude towards case from the outset based on his statements to certain individuals. From here we see what has unfolded.
Find the cross examination of Dr Lee. You won’t find it. He knew he was wrong and went home before the prosecution could ask him ANYTHING.
@@pommiebears Lee did testify fully.The heel print in the cement ,had a print in blood on top.
🥃
How can oj come home with bloody clothes, bleeding hands, and not get one drop of blood on his white carpet or in the drains of the shower or sink. Even the towels he dried off with should have had traces of blood. Something don’t add up.
There were blood drops leading to Simpson's front door, in the foyer of his house (witnessed first by Kato Kaelin, not the cops), and in the sink and shower drain in his bathroom. It is believed his bloody clothes were thrown in the washing machine and retrieved by his assistant Cathy Randa.
I've always known this part..... HE JUMPED IN HIS POOL.
@@riverebec1lies
They checked the drains and washing machine, wasn't a trace of blood!!!
37:41 what about the others?
3:39 How they felt bout Darden
"I'm deeply offended and disgusted." -- Karen, er Marcia Clark
she sounds no different than the defense that keep hammering a murder trial onto racism
Why would OJ be mad if Nicole was with other men and he was with many women during the marriage and controlled her and then when she does what she wanted it’s wrong. Many men and tbh women too do this and it’s so ridiculous
Ask OJ. He left 5 blood drops at the crime scene. OJ murdered both of them.
It's life happens every day but not everytime with mortal consequences.
I don' t want you no more but you shouldn' t be with other man/woman too.
Just do your commitment take care on the kids and live like a nun.
OJ is a psycho, treated Nicole like his private possession.
And now try to imagine OJ' s feeling when a good friend told him about Nicole' s many lovers, her drug abuse and how much she humiliated him.
And then there comes a time and enough is enough, maybe because he was not invited to family dinner and Goldman was at the wrong place at the wrong time.
Just thinking.
Controlling behaviour is a classic early warning sign of abusers.
@@lesterpaul9657 you aren't thinking hard enough because what you said is stupid
He was a jealous prick who had just been dumped by his girlfriend then been knocked back by 2 others within 4 hours. he might have been a little mad ?
I feel for the jurors.
Yeah, I was shocked they were subjected to four days of testimony from the shoeprint expert. Shoeprints! A total dead end.
Don’t, they don’t deserve your empathy. Feel for the victims’ families.
@@bjsing247 I send my empathy to the Jurors.
@@daffyduckfan4478 Shocker, another agenda driven black supremacist. Appreciate the honesty though. Wear a shirt telling everybody
@@bjsing247 There is no agenda. You cannot tell me who I should feel for. Who the hell are you?
Julie Grant you are gorgeous and I could listen to your beautiful self all day!
28:38 duck loose
He dropped a glass 😊😁😂🤣 😀 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
The fact that dr Phil cop Tom Lang said he couldn’t break a glass in the sink is hilarious how can you not break a glass in a sink
because a sink has no friction, which is what causes the force to transfer and break the glass. It's more likely that the sink would crack due to the force of the strike. More time studying physics and not TH-cam if you think that's not possible ?
@@thickus your telling me if I drop a glass in a sink the sink has more of a chance of cracking lol that’s why I hate you scientist always trying to sound smart. As someone who dropped plenty of glasses the sink never broke on me. Don’t comment on a TH-cam post criticizing someone for watching TH-cam that’s pretty ignorant
@@Booknowlakealmonor My degree in physics says yes. There is a lot of research in mechanical degredation due to an external force. It has proved that friction and direction of travel have everythig to do with it. It's actually more possible he would have got cut from a chiped part of the sink. hard materials that make up bathroom items are so hard they crack easily.
try droppping a bottle of aftershave in your sink, or even a medium weight hotel glass. Tell me how much your new sink costs, I'd be interested
@@thickus this has to be the most ignorant thing I have ever hear as some who is a behavioral consultant I am appalled that you have a degree. How the hell do you truly believe dropping a glass dropped in the sink will not break the glass? Have you ever dropped a glass in a sink? Better yet film this for me do 10 trails and show me the consistent damage caused by the glass you idiot. Your the reason this society is damaged how can you have a degree in physics and not understand basic concepts such as sinks break glass that we teach 5 year old for safety but your idiot self would think it was safe for your child to drop a glass in the sink?
@@thickus there no wonder why you only have subscriber😂😂😂😂😂🙏😂🙏🙏👌👌👌
Lang and Everyone Else is mad he was innocent and their Frame job Failed. R.I.P. oj
Bingo
@@theinquisitiveprince7095 yezzir
No thanks
Except we DO know he didn't do it, as was proven by the defense as nauseum. We may simply always have people who choose not to look at what was presented in great detail and accept it.
3 take them do for prints an art bell
GENUINE CORROBORATION? TO ALIGN NOT HEARSAY EMITTING DIRECTLY FROM
THE "HORSE'S MOUTH". CORROBORATION
TO GUARANTEE HE IS NOT "LYING" ON
HIMSELF? 😎
Furhman will go down in history as the man who let a killer walk free and for ever be a racist cop. Who lost the most important case of his law enforcement career and made every cop America think twice about your action because you will pay a heavy price.
16:30 wait... this is the guy that OJ pulled a gun on and got jail time for. He is now defending OJ!! omg. what a world.
Lang all over the place
Oj might have been guilty but furman definitely planted evidence
"oh regardless what this world renowned expert says, there was no other footprints there period." Arrogance thy name is Tom Lange
He swears he is the only one who knows what the truth is 😂😂😂
How Simpson did not get extended injuries from 'his' to the death fight with Goldman...???...The story of Glen Rodgers being the killer is to consider....
Couldn't agree more
Goldman would of been trying to defend not attack from a knife while being viciously stabbed, I could stab you repeatedly and barely have a mark on me
You don’t lose chunks of skin if you’re just hitting out. He hit the tree, and the bark took the chunk out of his hands.
Cuz he didnt do it. These idiots think tje man fighting for his life hit the air and trees to sustain the injuries...everything but the obvious: he hit the person stabbing him to death.
@@QuatMan yeh he did injure the man who murdered him, oj Simpson
My daughter wentbto t h e art school she works for with a scholarship there. It was a beautiful theater that they graduated
Possibly 2 sets of prints? Yep - someone else was there....Jason
Could have been Glen Rogers
No evidence Jason or Glen Rogers were there.
@@Catbooks because they weren't suspects so they didn't even look into it
@@ramslife7295 They weren't suspects because there was no evidence pointing to them. Jason had a solid alibi. Glen Rogers was somewhere else. No evidence.
Plus do you think OJ would take the fall for Jason? Haha hell no. He loves himself too much.
So far by episode 20 this is what we got so far :
1- Dr Henry Lee, the worlds authority said the patterns are NOT from BMaggli shoes
2 -Dr Badén, worlds authority says the autopsy was a total shitshow
3- The Lead detective took vials of blood HOME with him instead of turning them into the evidence room
4- The 2nd detective LIES in the stand and turned out to be a total racist, who says he would FRAME black people. On tape . Then has to plead 5th so he doesn’t end up in jail.
5- No murder weapon was ever found and no prints of OJ in crime scene, however , a print and hair from another person was found in crime scene.
If this doesn’t add up to reasonable doubt , then what does ??
Thats the mountain of evidence that cleared Simpson.
good question
You are badly mistaken about the Bruno Magli thing. He’s not referring to the footprints, but to markings on Ron’s jeans and a piece of paper
@@iPro3million umm ok. What bout all the other stuff I mentioned
@@AR-zm8kd 2 - there were mistakes by Golden made in the autopsy. However at the civil trial, Dr Baden disowned a lot of the statements he made during his testimony in the criminal trial as they were inaccurate.
3 - Vanatter did take evidence home with him, bad practice and slightly suspicious but he did give an explanation.
4 - Fuhrman is obviously a despicable person but if you use logic and reason, it’s practically impossible for him to have planted evidence in this case
5 - No murder weapon, true, probably the biggest piece of evidence the Prosecution didn’t have.
All of these things, however partially true, do not change the evidence that does exist against OJ: his blood and hair at the crime scene, footprints matching his size and a rare shoe he owns, the gloves (one at crime scene, other at his house) Nicole had purchased those exact make and size of glove a couple of years earlier, victims blood in OJ’s car and on his socks, limo driver not seeing his Bronco parked outside his house at ~10.20pm
That juror needs to shut up !!
The most important trial of the 20th century was the Nuremberg trials.
Not this so called "trial of the century"
But the results of Nuremberg was a foregone conclusion.
my personal opinion is this, and it is only my opinion.
OJ was there, but with another person and that person was the one who did the killings. OJ was to beaten up and weak to be able to fight off a 25 yr old young healthy male while stabbing him. The prosecution was solely based on Ron had fought the killer, yet, OJ only had a small cut on a finger. if anyone who has ever seen or been in a fight, especially with 2 people, you would see bruises, cuts, scrapes and contusion all over everyone.
The reason why I say this is that OJ, knowing there would be no evidence against him, "took one for the team" and forced the prosecution to focus on him, and not his partner. and I believe his partner to be his oldest son, not nicole's son. the DNA evidence would be nearly the same, but back then it wasn't 100% able to tell the difference.
that would explain why the glove is in the back, and the blood was in the front of the house. OJ had his son go around back to avoid being seen by the limo driver just incase. and once OJ changed his clothes and left, his son waited with the evidence, the bloody clothes and knives, and left afterwards. The police testified that when they went to OJs house, the lights were on. Anyone leaving their home to go on a flight, would not leave all the lights on if they are going to be out of town.
DNA showed only partial DNA of OJ, but did not exclude the mixture of the son's mother, who he had 50% of her DNA too.
That is my opinion. OJ was with his son and went to see Nicole and Ron showed up.
Glen Roger
Good theory...may be accurate......I thought it was 2 dealers..wanting payment..set up oj... called and said...go check his Kidd's...or else..
he went..saw the works...left the scene...knowing he was setup??
His son has been excluded. Only one person slaughtered those 2 people and his name is OJ. Throw out all the questionable evidence - there is still mountains of it against him
His son has been excluded. Only one person slaughtered those 2 people and his name is OJ. Throw out all the questionable evidence - there is still mountains of it against him
After all these years, I'm still not convinced of guilty or innocent for OJ. One thing that the defense could never explain were those blood drops from the scene & at OJ's house. They were present BEFORE they took a vial of his blood. They couldn't explain that but due to sloppy detective & crime scene work, we will nvr know!!
Wrong,watch Dr Robin Cotton testimony under cross from Peter Neufeld.
The evidence shows that OJ parked the bronco, went through the gate and walked into the house. This is based purely upon (non-movement type) blood drops leading from the bronco to the house. The fact that every blood drop was straight down means that OJ would have stopped at every location and dripped, then kept walking. Then, they want us to believe that he left the house, went ALL the way around the property, over the chain link fence, dropped a wet bloody glove. Got no blood on the wall or the fence or from there, back into the house. Sorry, it doesn’t work for me. I believe OJ was there either before, during, or after. But I believe someone else killed those people with his knowledge.
@@daspicsman Love it,I believe Ron was the intended victim.Blood Oath,links Fhurman,Timothy McViegh and the DNA expert that worked at Ceder Sinai where all the Simpson clan,gets treated.
The Defense was able to establish Vannatter brought his blood sample to Rockingham and they showed the tape, The prosecution wasn’t able to explain they lost 1.5 ccs of his blood
@@garrickgregory6403 yeah I remember that.
25:33 so I wonder what juror #6 already going into this planning to write a book? He had a lot a lot a lot of notes. And his form of a sentencing when he writes his very book like. So did he ever write a book? Seems like he went into this planning to write a book. If so, can someone let me know I would really really like to read. It sounds like it will be good.
I don't understand "beeps". I heard nothing in this episode or on the tapes that Fuhrman said that was racist.
Mr four a. Exaderate
31 e plaai
Imma be real I'm only 25 so I wasn't alive when this was going on
But with that being said still i think OJ did it but fuhrman planted that glove behind Kato house to make the shit stick
Marsha fucked up her own case and people need to stop giving Johnnie and his team so much shit ITS HIS JOB TO SECURE HIS CLIENT THE BEST DEAL POSSIBLE.. Marsha you decided to bring these witnesses you didn't question them enough to find holes in their stories don't get mad at Johnnie for bringing the defense he brought because YOU Marsha brought the witness you brought aka Racist Ass Fuhman
and the time line of how OJ left Rockingham to go to Bundy and get back doesn't add up to me.... now to be fair I've never been to California so I'm it qualified to say how long it would take but looking at google maps it doesn't look like he could execute all of that in that little amount of time and I think that's all on Marsha for bringing the case too quickly and really just reaching too much... no doubt OJ did it but you trying to say OJ killed both of them in like 45 minutes is OD yeah he's an athlete but be real lady wtf
Furman used the n word on the tapes as a fictional character. They tried to sell the thing to radio stations. How can it be taken as him really saying it like in real life?
Imgur Lund It wasn't a fictional character you fool. He was talking what he used to do as an officer
Fuhrman gave the defence a way in to the case, race. Once he said he never used the N word that jury would call bullshit, then the tapes too, this guy was a racist piece of shit. But I believe he found the glove where oj dropped it while rushing from his bronco to quickly get cleaned up and changed before getting in the limo with Allan park. The blood drops at rockingham that led from the bronco upto and into the house fuhrman couldn’t of planted because where would he get OJ’s blood from that night. No matter your thoughts on fuhrman doesn’t alter the fact that oj killed his wife and her friend
@@TheMrbc74 The jury heard very little from Furhman so you are wrong. The reason they voted not guilty is because of how badly the police handled the evidence. Go to Brian Heists TH-cam channel and you will see more lies debunked about this trial
@@christiansoldier77 so do you believe someone else committed those murders and used bruno magli shoes that photos showed oj wearing
@@TheMrbc74 We don't know those are Bruno Magli. This is one of the biggest lies about the case.
We'll never know . He wasn't THAT athletic anymore . He had know aches and pains , no swelling , nothing .
Victorious Light you don't have to be swollen m He has arthritis and many football ⚽ injuries. Plus the workout video showed he had knee problems
@@christiansoldier77 The workout video was filmed over a 5 day period.
@@philipwilliams1754 Your point is ?
@@christiansoldier77 Showing OJ was not capable of extended physical routine.
@@philipwilliams1754 arthritis doesnt come and go. If he has it, he wouldnt be able to do the exercises, full stop
Way too much playing the race card in this trial. It wasnt fair to Nicole or Ron at all!! When you're afraid you can win, you can always use the RACE CARD.
When the prosecution star witness turns out to be a full-on genocidal racist, it's unavoidable.
That's just an excuse for racists to hang to after a loss such as this. The truth is the LAPD up to that point had cops that were planting evidence on people, it went on for years, but the primary target were black people. It would have been incompetence not to explore that. There was much reason to go after Fuhrman. The race card had been played by racists against blacks for years, and they finally got nailed with it. No one should accept that racist cops can just frame up people and nothing ever said about it. Fuhrman was the racist cop with the reputation for targeting blacks, and he was part of that case as an investigating detective. You damn well better believe a defense attorney worth his (or her) salt will go after that type of witness.
It confirmed what we in black neighborhoods had known for years. Observing that line of questioning in real time was a catharsis for us.
@@NkrumahTure the Asian officer is on tape planting drugs on the black suspect.Last year.
They used brains, all you see is a race card, can't you use your brain? At first I thought he did it too just from watching snippets videos online but after watching this series I have tremendous doubts, Please answer the following questions:
1. Would he be stupid enough to drop one glove at the crime scene and another at HIS house but diligent enough to dispose his bloody clothes and murder weapon, not being found to-date
2. Why was the a mirror image pattern on "his" bloody socks found in his house
3. How was he able to dispose his bloody clothes but not his bloody socks
4. There are blood drops from the main gate to his house but apparently he jumped over the fence after committing the murders and supposedly dropped of his bloody glove?
Please create a theory that makes sense because the prosecutors didn't convince me he did it, the defense really did a good job, because if I were a juror I would vote "Not guilty". I underestimated the dream team at first before watching this series and just thought it was a bunch of lawyers who played the race card just from watching 10 minute videos on TH-cam and reading other people's comments but after watching this. The defense team did a phenomenal job.
Pointing out a racist cop and playing tapes of him talking about how racist he is isnt playing any cards. Just reporting what he said and the contexts in which he said racist things. With a black man on trial, it is justified.
SPOILER ALERT:...football bully/thug butchers x-wife and friend in jealous,egomaniac rage!...
Imagination.
@@philipwilliams1754 works for me! (and mostly NORMAL and stable human beings!..lol!)
Oh u were there? Lol
Look at the photos carefully ,you will see one of them shows OJ standing on turf,and Dolphin cheerleaders in the back ground.The Fins have never played a home game on turf.
I’m not there yet but I would assume it was in Buffalo as i thought he did bills games And they played on turf.
@@oldironsides4107 Read my post,he's on turf,there are Dolphin Cheerleaders in the back ground.The Dolphins has never played a home game on Turf,if it's in Buffalo,Cheerleaders do no travel.
Different venue possibly playoff
@@philipwilliams1754 ^
What is the significance of the picture and the turf? I don't understand but would like to pls.
The writer: "What is on the tape is what Officer Fuhrman said to me. I dont know if he was lying or anything else."
Quit acting like this woman GAVE him a script to read. He was giving HER the dialogue...not the other way around.
The prosecution did an AMAZING job, but the fact that OJ was innocent simply could not be hidden.
"the fact that OJ was innocent". what the heck are you smoking Mrs. Quat Mann?
OJ has always been innocent. Thanks for realizing it. So many people don't look at logic instead they go with emotion instead...
@@JOHNNYSGIRL1960 lol. I see what you doing here. lol
@@JOHNNYSGIRL1960 Irony. He's always been guilty. Only the gullible don't know that by now.
I want some of what you’re on please.
Julie Grant is a very beautiful intelligent woman. I could listen to her all day
Totally not interesting. Go to the Brian Heiss channel to see the truth about the OJ Simpson trial. (Hint: %100 innocent)
I don’t care weather oj, did it or not. The fact that he is exposing the corruption and the way people are mistreated by la pd. I agree and support him 100 percent.
He didn't expose anything, that was his defence team. He was totally self-interested. You SHOULD care that he brutally murdered two people and got away with it. What if it were your sister, your daughter, your brother, your son?
Mistake to put clark on the case black woman hated her
He did it. 🥱
How are you so sure with all of the discrepancies in the evidence and timeline
How do you know? Were you there that night?
You don't get it
The comment is simply to make you laugh #joke
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@jonathanperry6302 yup, I was der. He dun did it. 🤓🫃🏻🇺🇸🍻
I’d say most of the public agrees that he did it. Hell his lawyers probably thought he did. I know Kardashian did. But their job was to put reasonable doubt in the mind of the jury. It’s pretty remarkable how they went about it.
There u go simpson charlie n a c shoe's duh
Please join my Facebook group, titled fans of the o.j. trial