The Birth of a Nation - Official Movie Review
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2016
- The Birth of a Nation starring Nate Parker, Armie Hammer, Penelope Ann Miller, and Gabrielle Union is reviewed by Ben Mankiewicz (Turner Classic Movies), Alonso Duralde (TheWrap and Linoleum Knife podcast), and Christy Lemire (www.ChristyLemire.com).
Read what other critics had to say: www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_...
Set against the antebellum South, THE BIRTH OF A NATION follows Nat Turner, a literate slave and preacher, whose financially strained owner, Samuel Turner, accepts an offer to use Nat's preaching to subdue unruly slaves. As he witnesses countless atrocities--against himself and his fellow slaves--Nat orchestrates an uprising in the hopes of leading his people to freedom.
Watch more movie reviews: • Reviews of Movies Rele... - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
It took 10 minutes for white people to complain about being vilified in a slavery movie. I applaud your restraint.
***** Well, since I haven't seen the film yet, I can't speak to whether or not it has a simple story structure. As far as religion goes, yes many older African-Americans may feel personally attacked by the film using religion to justify slavery. My hope is that the younger black audience, who like most millennials are becoming less religious will understand what the film is trying to say and won't have the emotional religious response that our parents may have.
Have tyou seen the way Nazis were portrayed in Schindler's List? Or the way the English were portrayed in Braveheart? Suddenly we need this special empathy?
***** The words of one critic in an ocean of film criticism disproves my point? More like the exception proves the rule. And many things go into a RT score outside of the portrayal of the villains. But even so, 78 is a very good score.
yet when it comes to crime it is often referred to as if its an issue with the black community, as oppose to an economic condition.
***** So emotional. Weren't you the one who came at me, then told me to leave you alone and now you are coming back again? You didn't make any real points outside of petty name-calling. Show me the part where you said Birth of a Nation had the same RT score as Braveheart. The truth has you so enraged you're hallucinating.
You people watch and review Woody Allen films every single year. It shouldn't be so hard to separate the art from the artist.
Exactly.
did they talk about separating the art from the artist from Bryan Singer X-Men movie?
hmm....
adds: presidents/slave massas reportedly raped their [slaves], yet the can separate 'that crime' from the "great legacy" of those former politicians too. Jefferson is rarely ever mentioned [by minds like theirs'] in the same breath as Sally H.
*****
christy and the others have never brought up the notion of how they werent able to separate the artist fromt he art during those movies. and i have seen their reviews for the last 2 xmen movies. no issue with those reviews.
Racist be like "Stop bring up history!"
More like reasonable people be like "stop glorifying this nutcase who's claim to fame is hacking random white people to death"
Charles Baylor One of his co-stars has come out against Parker for his rape during college for which he received no punishment, much as a certain white defendant recently received (less even). The story here is one thing, though I think the movie '13th' sounds better, but the person that made it is a poor star for Hollywood or any institution to laud.
Mick Travis I Know right! They think slavery was just forced labor. The type if slavery practiced in the Americas was so barbaric compared to any other form of slavery.
One white person died compared to hundreds of blacks... Shows how much racists value someone's life over anothers just because of skin color. The world would be a better place if they would value the life of innocents equally instead of only getting pissed because one pretty white lady died
Charles Baylor
Wow that's a stretch, the four fathers were great men Turner was a nutcase
"he lost his way" because he took the wipe out of the slave master's hand and gave him a taste of his own medicine?
I hope Ben criticizes the Allies who invaded Nazi Germany & liberated the Jews.
Glad that you guys judged the film by it's own merits, I wish the audience could do the same.
I'll probably see it next year when the awards type of films come out here in Chile.
Why did you doubt they could? A positive review would be suspect?
don't get your panties wet yet, these are the same guys who gave Carol a high score and praise and that movie went largely forgotten and didn't win shit at awards season, they absolutely hated and trashed The Revenant and that movie was one of last awards season big winners.
Of course Christy would give it the lowest score, and yes I'm going there
going where exactly? All you pointed out was a mere factoid. What inference do you want to make here? That you don't like women? That's she's wrong and you're right? Have you even seen the movie?
Get a life and grow a brain Mick. Reported for bullying.
*****
You're a self-loathing idiot if you don't enjoy Christy on multiple levels.
Did Ben say Nat Parker ? Smh.
So did Alonzo...
Has anyone actually read the book 12 Years a Slave was based on? The 12 year old son of Epps (Michael Fassbender's character, who wasn't depicted in this film) whipped slaves mercilessly. They didn't show that in the film adaption. You say Nat Turner wasn't a good guy, Ben, okay. But he's better than a guy who watches "incest porn."
I don't mind him killing children ,babies and women.....they did it to us too.
Unfortunate that you're alright with sinking to the oppressor's level - as far as killing innocents. Thankfully others think differently and work to lead society away from this sort of cycle of violence.
I hope you can get it out of your system through movies like this and then join folks who would rather see a just peace than unjust peace or unproductive vengeance.
You don't find the brutal murder of innocent children? Wow
i think you guys forgot that the children too, were evil. and the movie tried to address that when Solomon hung
These white reviewers are obviously butt hurt about this powerful movie.
yes
Egles42025 lol if you knew anything about the far left you would understand TYT is not remotely close to that.
The killing of children is such a difficult topic to discuss. Those children might have become horrible pro-slavery, rapist adults; but on the flip side, who knows?
Either way they probably would have grown up to fight for the confederacy. So Nat was really helping the union win the civil war. True patriot. lol
well, do we know what was definetly in the books of history, slave children being sold into slavery, raped, beat, and lynched. all as a child, with other atrocities done.
Elephant in the room. Christy were you able to seperate the man from the movie. I wonder. People have to see this movie. Really really strong.
I thought Alonso was the elephant
no, I don't "have to" see it, in fact I won't.
Ben needs to take his own personal beliefs about religion and watch the movie without bias. The main character was deeply religious in the early 19th century and that was common, as depicted in the film.
Trump supporters prefer the first version. It's a kind of Ghostbusters situation.
lol took the bait
Technically Hillary hasn't either
Don't insinuate that everyone who prefers the first ghostbusters and aren't happy with the reboot are Trump supporters as you did lol.
The God Emperor I think he's talking about the first version of The Birth Of A Nation
I'm troubled by Alonso's remark about "historically inaccurate rapes" History according to WHOM?
Hey Christy, did you have a problem separating the artist from the art for all of those Bryan Singer movies?
*****
christy has never stated the inability to separate the artist from the art in a bryan singer review though. but she has to bring it up almost immediately during this review?
So all Nazis weren't that evil....got it
And the Jews that fought back weren't good guys...
Towards the end of the war Germany had many child soldiers fighting in their ranks. Look it up. Breaking News, war sucks.
Palestine
This film has a 4.8 on IMDb. I guarantee most of the people who rated it didn't even see the fucking movie. They just hate Nate Parker because he was ACCUSED of sexual assault. Even though there was NO evidence. What a bunch of bullshit!
Actually it had that same score before the allegations even started. The fact is that this is not a very good movie.
the score comes from racist downvoting or people who don't Like white guilt oscarbait
Sudev Sen You make it sound like not liking white guilt Oscar bait is a bad thing LOL! Also explain to me then why 12 Years a Slave has an 8.1 on IMBD? Explain that one to me sherlock
12 years a slave handled that 'good slaveowner' thing perfectly.
A lot of people liked Benedict Cumberbatch as did Solomon but as the audience as Solomon were reminded, he was a slaver. A kind slaver but complicit all the same.
Funny how everyone has already forgotten 'Django Unchained', which really kicked off this whole enterprise of making interesting revisionist slave movies.
Chris Wright 'Revisionist'. Hey guys, have you heard! The Civil War was about States Rights! States Rights everybody!
Your comment is stupid.
DarkEpyon123 That's exactly the reason it's in quotations. And kinda the entire point of my post.
Though I do notice that I said kind slaver at the end there so you're right overall.
Ving Rhames
Not entirely sure where you're going with this bro. I dd not mean revisionist in a negative sense, not in the slightest. On the contrary, historical events reappropriated to the current age and social climate are invaluable tools for changing attitudes and beliefs, and engendering courage in the righteous and free.
Ving Rhames
i got you man, my comment wasnt meant towards you, i saw the quotations.
i just meant that in general, when i hear that in any other place. we're on the same page.
I thought "12 Years A Slave" was a good picture not great
Totally disagree, I think its a fantastic film and Steve McQueen is one of the best and most interesting directors of our time
"of out times".... calm down, he's only made three films!
Terry Silvester But all three of his films are brilliant plus he's made plenty of short films that prove his ambition and skill as a director. And I said ONE OF, not THE best of our time.
***** Well hopefully you enjoy Hunger more because I think it's fantastic (in case you couldn't already tell) and I definitely disagree about the characterization in 12 Years a Slave. The characters have slightly less depth than those in Hunger and Shame, but that didn't bother me as much as it may have bothered you because I think there still was plenty of depth in performance and McQueen's use of the camera to convey emotion never fails to impress me.
I love you all. such an honest review. you guys are my favorite TH-cam channel.
Member slavery? Member christianity? Yeah I member.
member lynchings, member assassinations? I member.
member forced breeding between the slaves? member how the offspring were taken from the parents and sold in to slavery?
i member...wait what?
Bolg-Gro-Markarth yeahhh you member
12 years a slave is such a better representation of slavery than this....and the fact he left alot out of the actual story takes alot away from it
as a black woman and a child of the 70'and teen of the 80's i have seen many movies depicting slavery i think it is horrible and disgusting for any human to be treated that way i wish someone would make a film about whites being treated unfairly and inhumane
What was the documentary they recommended at the end? Thirteen? I can't find it online.
Me neither. Looked everywhere.
It's called 13th.
www.rottentomatoes.com/m/13th/
What is the movie that Alonso says not to see at the end of the review? "The Griffith"? What's that?
the birth pf a nation by griffith (the director) ,which is really racist
What was that movie that they were recommending? 13th what? I could not understand them.Does anyone know?Thank you
13th documentary
I agree this was better than 12 years a slave
The white characters were oversimplified? Really? Nearly all whites were not directly involved but were complicit which is just as heinous. Y'all really couldn't get any Black people at YTN to review this? Smh
Josie Alford a no 12 years of slavery was way better and had a way better plot. The Slave became a free man
hilarious did they not see the horrific treatment of the slaves, perfect example of Siena history through white lenses there okay until you stand up and fight back
I was wondering what would happen, after the initial reaction at Sundance I started to hear people say that maybe it isn't quite that good.
What movies are they saying at 13:10
regarding the comments around the 1:34 mark -- Back in the 19th century Nietzsche mentioned that when people are in the mountains, the high altitude tends to relieve their worries and give them happy feet.
Slave used to keep slavery alive until said slave becomes a direct victim of slavery then becomes spiritually awakened isn't complex enough? ok
she said @3:00 that he was basically indifferent about the killing, when actually the movie spent a min. of film time showing him physically ill over killing his master.
Alonso is a little over-eager at 7:30 in jumping in to tell Ben why Ben preferred this movie to 12 Years a Slave. Kind of arrogant and rude and presumptuous. And of course Ben just brushed off the comment because it simply wasn't true.
What an odd historical figure to make an inspirational movie about. Nat Turner was a crazy religious nutjob. When is Frederick Douglass going to get a worthy biopic?
He was crazy because he literally believed he was a biblical messiah. I'm sorry but that's objectively crazy.
You need to read the book "The Fires of Jubliee" and realize how much of a conflicted figure Nat Turner was. He was equally a nut case as he was noble for wanting freedom. Spartacus, as far as I know, never proclaimed to be chosen by a god.
I think he wanted to make it especially for the controversy
Right? It's just gross making that nutcase murderer out to be a hero
+D So, if you were enslaved, would you not rebel? I mean, if you wanna live like an animal your whole life, go ahead
So we saw Birth of a Nation this afternoon. Starts off a little slow. And sort of meanders along like that wagon Nat and Turner drive through the countryside. You know what's coming but nothing prepares you for the end. Packs a wallop. I cried, as I'm sure a lot will, from the power of the conclusion. Unbelievable that human beings can treat each other that way. But they did, and sometimes they still do.
I wanted to see this film the first weekend out because of the controversy. I'd heard the movie was perfect. Won awards at Sundance. Projected to be a run away winner at the Oscars (no #OscarSoWhite in 2016), then the shoe fell and we read about Nat Parker's college days, and the tragedy that happened to his ex-girlfriend. And the possible end to his film career. As the mother of 2 daughters I was appalled, but I'm also the daughter of an African American man who was subjected to Jim Crow South Carolina and in his honor I felt the need to support Nat Parker's film.
As Ben Mankiewicz said, it's not hard to separate Nat Parker filmmaker from Nat Parker the man, when he has such a compelling story to tell and he tells it so brilliantly. I'm also with Alonso Duralde, I'm looking forward to Parker's next film. He has a lot to say and I believe we need to hear from diverse voices like his. I truly wish him well on this film because if ever there was a time in history that we need to remember where we came from as a nation it's today when factions in the political arena strive to take us back.
Any relation with great movie The Birth of A Nation by D.W.Griffith?
It's a mocking of that movie. The original was important in terms of film/editing techniques, but was one of the most bigoted pieces of media ever made. Naming a black directed movie by that name is a big 'fuck you' to racist america
All three are wearing really cool tops today. Christy with the cozy lime green sweater, Alonso with a very nice Ralph Lauren plaid, and then Ben with that soft cotton button-up.
I disagree with Ben because 12 years a slave was based on true events. The production didn't want to fabricate any scenes just to make it less unsettling to watch. They wanted to create a story genuine to its history as much as possible. Besides, they're moments were the movie gives you an emotional release such as the very last scene.
"I would argue Steve McQueen is more an artist than Nate Parker"!
Yeah! No shit Sherlock! He's one of the YBA's from the 90's along with Damien Hirst and Tracey Emin and was nominated for the Turner Prize in '99.
in the grand scheme of things, that doesn't mean shit. art is subjective, and I may (or may not) consider Parker to be a better artist than McQueen. But if I did it would have jack shit to do with trophies. And Tracey Emin? Stop right there.
You guys underrated this film immensely. This film is close to a classic!
i honestly dont expect these people to give a non biased prospective on the film
:25 - "...young Nat Parker?"
4:34 , No for every line that tells us how to be a good slave, there are 2 more that condemns it and reveals the slavers' punishment
I wonder if David Duke enjoyed this movie.
this movie looks like it's made by a edgy 1st year history student
this movie didn't get a Hollywood budget. It was paid for by the director and friends. It was shot with a 7 million dollar budget. What do you expect? an epic?
triple double homicide Ive seen far better movies made at 500k
Sudev Sen name some.
triple double homicide Birdman was a far superior movie and cheaper, Ex Machina also, even 12 years a slave was cheaper and better than this shit.
Avenger07 12 Years a slave budget: 22 million
Bird man budget:$16.5-18 million
Ex Machina budget: $15 million
The birth of a Nation budget: 7 million
When a book can be used to justify diametrically opposing positions (i.e. whether to keep slaves or treat everyone equally), then at the very least it must be admitted that such a book can't be inspired by a perfect creature. In any other context where truth is paramount, no book that contains that much contradictory nonsense would have garnered the level of reverence that the Bible enjoys.
Perfection could never be universal, that's simply impossible. If the Bible is inspired by a perfect creature, it must be because they perfectly served a function at a certain time and context.
Trying to apply it endlessly and universally is obviously nonsense.
seeing it now!!!
Did Alec Guinness make Ben's shirt in a lab?
I saw it Friday I was emotionally touched watching this movie. Oscar worthy two thumbs up🖒🖒
This has a 4.8 on IMDb...
Never trust Imdb ratings, RT is more accurate.
Your God Wilfred RT is the critic review, IMDb is the public... I tend to look at both but IMDb usually decides whether I watch the film or TV show.
Tom Monty RT does have audience reviews.
Your God Wilfred I am aware.
+Tom Monty The movie had a 5 before anyone saw it, because IMDB racists rate black films 1 star without even seeing it. After the rape scanal came out, it went down even more. The 4.8 has nothing to do with the actual film.
BEN YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT ABOUT 12 YEARS A SLAVE BLACK PEOPLE DONOT LIKE THAT MOVIE ITS A BRING DOWN MOVIE WE ARE TIRED OF NOTHIGN BUT SLAVE MOVIES THAT JUST SHOWS HOW SHITTY IT WAS TO BE A SLAVE WE WERE PEOPLE WITH STORIES EVEN AS SLAVES 12 YEARS A SLAVE CRAP MOVIE THE BIRTH OF A NATION THEY FINALLY GOT IT RIGHT!!!
the girl on the train looks more Oscar worthy than this
They totally missed the point.
For those of you who want to REAL story of Nat Turner's slave uprising, you need to read the book "The Fires of Jubilee" by Stephen B. Oates. It tells about the slave rebellion and doesn't leave out the unsavory parts. Like how Nat Turner thought he was chosen by god personally and he wanted to establish a new Jerusalem and so on. And how when he failed he was cut up and his body fat was used to make candles.
Children and Babies, what color were they?
3:20 is where i got offended. and by that i mean. PLEASE DO NOT FORGET that bible is about black slaves from Israel, who have a history of being in slavery, every age( not the dark ages though, we ruled that ) understand that. nat turner read Deuteronomy, read his condition and the bible and realized that. HOWEVER, i agree Nat wasn't reading the book properly, or was he?????
I feel like they missed the point. the movie was about Nat turner. It was supposed to be all about him. why was it difficult to see that history would not have portrayed the white people as villains but to a certain point. How would the story of Nat turner have been proven so long after he was dead and villanized for so long?
I really feel like there are a sizable amount of critics who shouldn't be reviewing this movie. I read 23 reviews for this movie on rotten Tomatoes. Most of the rotten scores I read read as an indictment of Nate Parker. If you can't separate the artist from the art then please refrain from sharing your opinion to a large audience who respects you. They deserve better than your b game. I feel like there are critics who are so focused on Nate Parker that they have failed at reviewing this movie. This PC world is killing our intelligence.
the can separate the artist from the art, they are just choosing not to with this film.
see if they made similar reviews for any of the Bryan Singer X-Men films.
GATOR BAIT !! look that shit up
I'm one of those who wished he didn't kill the women and children in bed. But then as he's walking up to be hanged, even the young girls are screaming at him hatefully. Human beings all suck. The movie was brutal but it could have been even more gory. They did what they felt they had to do. And none of us were in their position to judge.
Birth of a Nation is a GREAT movie.
They look uncomfortable reviewing a slave movie where white people lose
I bet if it was a movie like 12 years a slave where slaves were getting the flesh on their backs beaten of them, they would be all smiles during the review and saying "how awesome and fantastic" the movie was.
These fools that talk this stuff about slave movies must realize that slavery was not that long ago. Desegregation was less than forty years ago. And slavery ended in 1864! It terns of a historical perspective it was not that long ago. This movie from the filming to the relationships of the people on the plantation all were effected by the evil of slavery. Racism and hatred does not only affect the one that is being oppressed but the oppressor is damaged, physiologically, spiritually,and physically by the evil of slavery.This movie was a real human experience to have a relationship with your Master and to have a liking to him, yet having a hatred towards him for continuing and perpetuating a evil system of slavery. The filming of the camera created infinitesimal living environment that made you think you were really breathing the air in the world.I and many others enjoyed this movie will see it again and will discuss it with others on improving relationships and have authentic conversations to grow and learn so that this institution of evil will never be repeated again. This movie was breathtaking!
I just watched it and I was unimpressed...story needed some help...even nat turner was not a fully developed character...yikes
I think I'm done with WhattheFlick, much better reviewers exsist on this site
like who? kermode maybe
is he that British critic guy?
Mick Travis RLM don't really about movies like these.
All he knew of the world was through the eyes of a slave or the images of the bible. As humans our dreams and fantasies are based on our world view . We typically develop perspective through living a full life and what we learn through education. All things that developed the human mind was suppressed in the slave. It was illegal for slaves to venture pass the masters property line. Imagine what narrow view of life that would leave the mind with. That is the significance of the scene when his master threatened his life for suggesting he knew the value of 250 dollars. If you were held in mental darkness and the only light you were given was bible images, what might your fantasy of your freedom and true worth Intel? If you read princess and fairy tell books to your child daughter, your child may fantasize about becoming a princess, is that crazy?
Hey Ben, slave owners didn't have humanity. They were monsters.
GREAT MOVIE!
Theres is no way in hell (or more specifically 2016) that alonso would say ANYTHING negative about this flick. Big virtue signaling baby!
Ben. The only guy reviewer here with a brain. So that guy in the middle needed more empathetic white people? Because Nazis in holocaust movies have a lot of Nazis you like and they weren't all that bad because it was just the way things were. Nazism and all yeah? As for the lady, I haven't a clue what she was talking about. I saw the film and she thinks the character had no depth and was just too righteous? Ben gave it 8.9 reduced it to 8 and everything he said is exactly how i felt. It was better than 12 Years A Slave which I bet those other two loved. Jokerss
Lol, she said see BOTH films. Which two would that be? Oh yeah.... the "black" movies, lol. That's how she labels them in her mind. Two totally unrelated fucking films. One is a damn documentary. Smh..... Her heart is probably in the right place though....
Can't Ben keep his conservative politics on the main channel? Christ. So John Brown and Turner weren't ok b/c they were messianic? So the fuck what! They were also revolutionaries and if they used proto-liberation theology to mobilize their followers so be it. Wtf does that matteR?
How the fuck can Christy give a superhero movie like Captain America Civil War an 8.3, but a historically accurate movie like BoaN a 5.8? I've lost respect for WTF. There are much worse movies that get higher ratings. I gotta say I'm surprised by the nit picky reviews. "Birth of a Nation" was a terrific film that dealt with historically accurate subject matter. I guess I'm ridiculous for liking movies based on a true story and not flying robots or superhero movies. Also, yeah Nate Parker may be a bad dude, but did we hold that against "The Pianist" by Roman Polanski? Come tf on people!!!
Fam, they're racist the movie made her feel uncomfortable, she was given a peek in the mirror and she didn't like the truth
6.5 5.8 alonso and christy yall RASCIST!!!!
2:48 Christy, when you say Nat Turner was portrayed as a "good guy" you show an oversimplification that could be interpreted as "the director wanted to make me feel bad about being White". Nat Turner was simply portrayed as a guy in a messed up situation with no good options, which is correct. Where is your nuance, empathy, understanding and an ability to put context (slavery for crying out loud) into your opinion? To point out that the rapes were not historically accurate is trivial DURING SLAVERY where if those rapes didn't happen, you know others did. My biggest beef with this review is that you appear to not understand that Nat Turner and his "rebellion" was in a WAR for their freedom, a righteous cause. In that context, yes Christy, he was a good guy as was everyone in his rebellion. Please be a little more nuanced.
Amusing that they ask "Why has the love for this film cooled off since Sundance?" Isn't the answer obvious? The audiences who watched this film at Sundance were unaware of Parker's past crime and thus able to judge this film on its own merits. Anyone who watches it now has difficulty praising a film made by a rapist. Will the WTF reviewers take time away from a review to mention Polanski's past crime, the next time he has a newly released film?
He was acquitted. Thus he is not a rapist. Even if you would like to think so. That's the point of going to court and having a trial. You should say, you believe he is a rapist even though you were not there and have no idea what really happened. Polanski did it, admitted it and he ran away to AVOID trial. So stop comparing them.
TALKBACKWORLD You obviously misunderstood every word I wrote. Please read more carefully in future.
SoulStylistJukeBox No I didn't. You equated him with Polanski and said will they treat him the same as Nate by asking that question. My point is Nate went to court and was found innocent and Polanski never went to court.
TALKBACKWORLD Is English your first language? It it were you'd understand that the point of my post was to present a theory WHY the film isn't getting the reviews it deserves. Objective opinions of this film are forever tainted by the fact that almost everyone who reviews it feels the need to mention Parker's past. Because of it, anyone who watches the film feels shitty about praising it. My point was, I never read modern professional film reviews of Allen and Polanski's work that mention their past controversies SO WHY is this happening for Birth of A Nation? All of this was mentioned in my original post but for some odd reason you chose to misunderstand it.
TALKBACKWORLD Being acquitted unfortunately means NOTHING to the pitchfork wielding masses. Why do you think people are STILL talking about this?
Im not white, so i dont have to review the movie with white guilt. The movie wasnt a masterpiece like 12 years a slave. It was sloppy, dull and forgettable...
The original was better
Ha, you're funny. 12 Years a Slave was leaps and bounds better than this
No. It wasn't.
Oh no..another movie to talk race. We don't want that in America..
the point of the movie is the bible revealing that blacks are the Israelite
Yeah we get it, slavery was very bad...so the country outlawed it 151 years ago. It is not necessary to keep showing how bad it was back in those days. Every child learns about it plenty all throughout middle and high school.
J.A. Contes no they dony
They dony?? Is that some kind of slang term for don't? I wouldn't be surprised if that is the next big rap song. I can hear it now "No they dony" and it has to have some kind of ridiculous dance move that everyone will be doing until it becomes so overused that some new song and dance will have to replace it...
LOL And let's be fine with another 10 WWII movies that come out each year. But oh no, not another movie about slavery...
Oh I would not be okay with another 10 WWII movies coming out each year, that is my whole point. Don't even get me started on comic book movies...
Hey JAC off, would you prefer a movie about the modern state sanctioned extra judicial executions of African Americans and the poor? Or are you just trying to get us to ignore all American injustices one by one?
this film doesn't show any white people in a good light...5/10 but go see it.......lol terrible review
Is this a white supremacist movie review channel?