Support me at: Buymeacoffee: buymeacoffee.com/scienceisdope Patreon: www.patreon.com/scienceisdope_ YT Membership: th-cam.com/channels/g--ENXdDpXh5LyLigolg2g.htmljoin UPI: scienceisdope@icici (QR Code available on www.scienceisdope.com/support )
@ScienceIsDope : I liked this one Pranav. Well I think what Chavda meant by 95% is basically about Dark matter, and he turned it into a wishful thinking where he said he hoped its good energy, or God. Thing is people might think Dark Matter or Dark energy is negative energy or something bad. While in reality it is the matter which we expect to be out there which accounts for the gravitational attraction and rotation of planets and stars but yet we are not able to see that matter or interact with it. There is nothing positive or negative about energy. This is just stupidity to belive energy is positive or negative. People who are deep into spiritualism might hold these views. Here Dark = Unseen + Uninteracted. Keep up the great work. We need the merch now. Definitely buying something for sure.
Hey @ScienceIsDope is there any book you may suggest on logical fallacies? I hear many influencers quote logical fallacies but I couldn't find a book on it yet.
I would say to the youth that they should be proud of their own achievements instead of their ancestorswhose actions or achievements have little to no evidence. This ideology of feeling pride for other's achievements is the core cause that 80% of youth are now unhireable by top companies. The youth is busy feeling pride for fake things which nobody can prove or disprove. Its a time waste and dumbing down of the youth that the elites have created using social media.
@@T3Rmin4LCuRi0siTy You are absolutely right. What's worse is that even when studying past accomplishments, we often just chalk up the credit to the community or nation. This is not evil on its own, but often we do this while ignoring hte individual contributor. For example, all Indians know that numerical zero was first conceived in India, but how many can name the individual scholar who made the discovery?
@@T3Rmin4LCuRi0siTypeople are proud of thier ancestors because they were indoctrinated since first grade to be ashamed of thier ancestors thier culture, that thier ancestors were loosers and the culture was a foreign culture not your own. The more newer research is conducted the more these false indoctrination is falling apart, our ancestors were the only ones to fend off Islamic invasions for more than 300 years while great nations like Persia fell in 30 years, it was our culture that we spread around the globe and not that Aryan invasion BS. This is the reason people are proud, because they were forced to be ashamed for a false reason before
fr 😂😂why are they asking him those questions, as if he had a research done on it,lol.if the viwers wanted such answers they could have watched a random video on aliens existence on yt, i feel like they are just dumb kids without any education background, just targeting the vulnerable audience[ we know who the audience are..🤡🤡]with random dumb questions.
They are decently smart. They have seen what works on TH-cam India and are following the same track as BeerBiceps. Their thumbnail and title includes all the conspiratory catch phrases to lure in Ranveer's and Chavda's established audience base
But why should be anybody be proud of anything they themselves have not achieved ever in their life One should have pride only for their own accomplishments and not of others
@@theunbeatable728 While personal achievements are a significant source of pride, there's another dimension to consider. People often take pride in their cultural heritage or their ancestors' contributions to society. This pride is more about acknowledging and appreciating one's roots, history, and the collective progress made by their community. It doesn't necessarily replace personal accomplishments but adds another layer of emotional connection and identity. Just like we can feel proud of a friend's success, even if we didn't directly achieve it ourselves, this broader pride is about celebrating the accomplishments of a larger group that we're part of. It's a way to value both personal achievements and our connection to a wider community.
More than he deserves. This guy is not an credited historian. He's a physicist, and that "one" study he co-authored is not even peer-reviewed. He's a hack, plain and simple.
@@besthing-hg1zp what do you mean by light is same speed in all directions. Light does travel at the same speed in all directions. What's wrong with that?
Glad you did this video Pranav and gave a reasonable take. That podcast showed up in my recommended and I was like, "Oh shit, Pranav should pounce on this." And you did! Thanks!
Abhijit is historian, archeologist, physicist, genetist, engineer, defence expert, political analyst, social scientist and legal expert..... His new expertise is astronomy
Dhruv Rathi uses well researched academic paper to show his point but people like Abhijit Chavda who only says "There are evidences" but never bring them forward.
@Prodigious147 I am just saying that by his logic if Abhijit chavada is Johny sins, than dhruv must bhi johny sins pro max, just use some of your analytical power, for you anyone who is anti congress, aap is irrational, same leftist logic which deals in binary
@@amreshsingh3763 re chutiye first of all dhruv rathi sorry dhruv tatti only shows those paper whose political ideology is leftist and anpadh ganwaar have u ever watch abhijit chavda discussions with IISC Professor Arindhan Ghosh ex IAS Ved veer arya prominent Historian Meenakshi Jain the amount of knowledge these people have dhruv tatti cant learn in his whole life and chutiya kids like u believe in his papers lol
If we did invent the batteries and aeroplanes, where is the archeological evidence for it? What were the applications of those? And why did such an advanced civilization lose all that knowledge? Lol.
Why aren't we thinking logically?If flight was invented in India, why can't our archaeologist find material remains flight engine or other parts. How can they design so called " flying machines" even before discovering correct fuel. Also, the world moves forward not backward, if we were flying jets and curing cancer in ancient India, in 2016 we could've been vacationing on Mars. I did like to quote The Social Network (2010): "You know, you really don't need a forensics team to get to the bottom of this. If you guys were the inventors of Facebook, you'd have invented Facebook." Vedas and Upanishads are work of fiction at best just like all other religious books are.
@@jeanettewee8805 if you read rigved hindi translation you will see lots of things they are talking about inventing and what they need to make their life easy rather than formula or blueprints etc Sage ask his student: what kind of vehicles workers should make The kid replies a vehicle which can be useful both in water and air for transportation It will make their life easy and all Rigved is not something science book but its a book acknowledging things they have Thanking god for making such knowledgeable texts and all Thanking for sun jissey andhera door hota hai aur crops ache hote hai Etc etc it mentions lots of achievements That basically shows that they had such things Indian traditions was oral Writing culture came later Vedas and puranas are just acknowledgement Real knowledge was in shastras
Quite like the classic Jekyll and Hyde, Abhijit Chavda exhibits the persona of a man of science, logic, and rationality, yet flips into a conspiracy theorist when it comes to the history and culture of his own country.
@@agnosticatheist4093Bhai please listen to all the podcast with Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chawda, if you have the logical answers to his point then say it. He asks it to the most scholars of history but no one till now, proves him incorrect, only persons like science is dope says that the scholars don't believe him. But it is only opinion of science is dope's creator, no facts or evidence to prove him incorrect.
@@nicesed Apologies, but I don't lend my viewership to channels like Sanjay Dixit's or any extremist outlet without good reason.I have watched most of Abhijit Chavda's videos from which I have formed my opinion, not because someone else told me to, or based on a single video. Now, let's move on to the main issue. The burden of proof lies on the individual making the claim. Given that these claims have been made by Abhijit Chavda, it's his responsibility to substantiate them. There are numerous basic flaws in Abhijit Chavda's narrative, which could be exposed with proper cross-questioning by any rational mind.It's like you're running alone in a race, and everyone else is just cheering you on. Science necessitates robust empirical evidence - no quantity of logic can substitute this. Even Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity had to be validated through rigorous testing. Simply offering logic, referencing books, presenting mathematical calculations, or accusing an individual or organization does not constitute evidence. Science thrives on empirical evidence, which I regret to say, seems to have eluded Mr Chavda's purview in his discussions and podcasts to date.
@@nicesed yeah science is wrong. but abhijit chavda who believes Lalitaditya Muktapida conquered all of india and the world like alexander (ignoring the existence of other kingdoms throughout india and asia) is right. this is when the kannauj triangle wars started. forget about the world, he completely ignored the history of india. yeah, the caliphate lost to Lalitaditya Muktapida and the Romans just never mentioned such an important event. "Be proud of your ancestors & traditions but not at the expense of your reason & rationality"
@@spuriusscapula4829 well.....they do. watch them carefully Plus their hypocrisy is unbelievable. I know a huge chunk of people in India don't like India being get praise or get credited for its achievement in any field. It's pretty normal and common.
@@sawedoffshotgun8462not true Most of the time his view on other countries'politics is too shallow and he always talks about the past(40 years ago, 50 years ago something happened) to make sense of the present which is completely irrelevant of the topic.
It is not just in the field of science, Chevda peddles lots of half-truth, biased opinions about many historical topics also. These people along with that BeerBiceps with whom Chevda regularly collabs, have gotten their popularity because we Indian audience have a lack genuine research oriented inquisitive mind.
As an atheist myself the content you produce is very enlightening and based on scientific evidence. I started watching your channel since March 2023 and I've learned alot from your videos. The way you present the information is very easy to understand I've recommended your channel to lot of my friends. Keep up the good work and thank you.❤
Hey Pranav, invite Ranveer Allahabadia on your podcast, it'll be so fun seeing you interacting with him and him just nodding his head😂😂 Edit : like Duh? Ik he won't come, I'm just joking, imagining it happen.
Bro he is a podcaster who is there to make Money from the content his guest provide what will he come and talk when people critize him i really just can't do anything but laugh
Pranav: Lets talk science. Ranveer: Bro have you seen Yeti? Pranav: No Ranveer: Ok bro do you practice no-fap Pranav: No Ranveer: Ok lets talk Geopolitics bro... bro brrooooo Pranav: Bhakk
The whole video was amazing, found it really to the point. But I have to say that a person can have an opinion outside of consensus and have his own reasons to think that way. Aren't there a lot of examples in history of how general consensus were proven wrong upon further research or findings... So I think that's a topic of discussion rather than calling it "wishful thinking". Also the thing about " hoping for a supernatural being" is actually the wishing part. It's like saying "Everyone dies someday but I hope immortality is possible" not like he would rather believe in immortality over greater longevity. I think you misunderstood that part a bit. But I agree with everything else. It was a great video with real constructive and meaningful criticism.
Yup there have been many such incidents. The most popular and tragic one happened to Galileo. The general consensus was earth is the centre and sun and other planets revolve around it but Galileo claim which was against the consensus that sun is the centre was proven right later.
@@Samir12357 Bro I think u forgot to mention that Galileo had a telescope and his findings were backed up by observational evidence. It wasn't out of the blue that he got the idea of heliocentrism. He was among the first group of ppl to ever use a telescope for his research.
@@adhishwartak4766 the problem is pranav used scientific method logic where we directly observe the evidences and even 1 counter evidence is enough to discard our theory but unlike in history we always find evidences against our theory and based on them we make our interpretation. And there are all our hypothesis, that we find even 2 eminent historians differing on some points.
@@Samir12357That wasn't galelios opinion but observation Anyone can have any opinion Be it majoritarian opinion or minoritarian opinion it would be accepted in culture but not in science
Don't think that's a fair point people should be able to criticize whomever but haven't seen a single person make that appeal to authority, rw are doing good job making points not making fallacious statements like Dhruv rathee
@@booksanimeenthusiast What good points did left wing make? I can name Anand ranganathan, J Sai deepak. Even these two make u left wingers run away with tail bw your legs. And Dhruv isn't a LW figure even though he has the largest Media channel lol okay
You should collab with him & talk about science & rationality would be very interesting to see people of different ideologies having a conversation on same topic
Abhijit chavda is just the younger, evolved and updated version of rajiv malhotra. Both these guys love to talk about things that are nowhere near their area of expertise, that too with a lot of confidence. Especially rajiv needs some dawkins treatment that deepak chopra recieved on stage.
Abhijit Chavda might've have been fairly rational, but let's not forget he's also a prominent RW ideologue. And ppl who use logic to justify bigotry are the most harmful kinds of intellectuals.
@@suyashverma15can you show us all you ass.... Just curious Oh wait.... You're already doing that since what you're doing is basically shitting in comments section by asking for national/religious/caste identification.
Abhijit Chavda like most RW ideologues is a Faker. He publishes papers on physics which obviously are written by his father and publishes in non-descript journals and claims himselves as a physicist, but talks about Anthropology.
@@shanuyok615 so replying to every Chavda comment is not waste of time? Oh wait that's productive work for you, probably gives your life higher meaning or maybe pays your bills. Keep grinding mate.
Of course the sages didn't know everything, nor anyone will. Sages discovered who they are rather than comprehending what everything is or will be as their main goals of their lives. Whoever said they knew everything are ignorant.
Exactly!! like okay there were some extraordinary individuals, but didn’t every major civilisation had some? Its the present of the country that matters more.
Acharya Prashant who is a Vedic Scholar and have good knowledge of Vedas has mentioned many times that Vedas have no mention of science or scientific theories. Also Vedas have no mention of temples and idol worship.
man...i have book..which is about scientific history of India..And its written by one of former RSS leader in Gujarat..(80:20 =psuedo science: factzzz)...and irony is that my sister got it from Gujarat biotech research centre 😅😅😂
RSS hv hijacked hindu religion..they are harming hinduism more...they are literally killing the reasoning , rationality of majority indians.. They just use religion for power
He is expert in everything 😂. People are putting all of their life to be expert in particular subject but he is becoming famous by omitting his half ass knowledge
His main objective is a cultural change, where he wants people to embrace their own culture, by knowing about the history the knowledge that we had, and using that to make our nation stronger. We need a big economy, a strong army to do that, but for all that to happen we need to embrace our own culture first and not just romanticize about other cultures. When you want this level of a cultural shift you might have to get your hands DIRTY. Watch his videos and you will find this pattern. Btw what science is dope is talking about, is also spot on, but both of them have different objectives.
@@rishabhdiwan6928 We need stronger economy and not culture TBH. Even gulf countries have strict culture but not all are having stronger and consistent economy. Culture also takes out freedom so please study properly what basic schools tried to teach us.
@@sskamble6758 We do need our culture as mucha s economy because, think of the music today, how much of it is actual classical music, don't you think it's a knowledge we need to preserve. This is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of what our culture has to offer, there are more things that are top tier in our culture and can be used into translating into a stronger economy. Think of Yoga it's a huge these days in the west, it came from India. KNOWING HISTORY AND OUR OWN CULTURE IS REALLY IMPORTANT. think about it.
@@rupeshmagar-db9qmWhat lies? I am not getting? Think of a unicultural world, it will be really boring. Think of Japanese animes, think of western fantasies like LOTR and elder scrolls etc these all are the result of a multicultural world out of which money was made. I am not getting whaat is wrong in preserving our culture. Indians have been long kept away from the truths of how great we really were and forced into embracing westerns culture, now is the time for the truth to come out. I am glad that people like Abhijit chavda are doing it. The main point is people should be intelligent enough to understand the objective of the person they are listening to, and than everything will be clear.
The Egyptians literally laid out how they created the pyramids, in carvings and drawings. This ambiguity of how the pyrimads were build has been debunked
12:33 abhijit is perfectly right here. Rishi Kanad's philosophical idea of atomism is quantum in nature. The definition of quantum is "A quantum (plural: quanta) is the smallest discrete unit of a phenomenon" You are misrepresenting his views and connecting as if he is talking of modern quantum physics
Indians discovered teleportation, quantum computing, cryonics, quantum time travel and computing several millennia ago. I know coz it was written in the Vedas 1:35
18:28 I think you could give him the last one as he makes it clear it is wishful thinking on his part which makes it no more than something he wants should be true but clearly states might not be.
Ghanta astrophysicist. He doesn't have a PhD, works at some research institute which only exists on paper, and only has shady af publications. All his research is published with another Chavda guy (who is actually a physicist and possibly a relative). None of their published work is peer-reviewed or have a shared of scientific acceptance beyond the minds of these two guys. What's most probably happening is that he is latching on to the other Chavda guy who actually knows physics to publish far-fetched theories so that he can claim to be an 'astrophysicist', use that to gain some credibility on TH-cam which in turn allows him to spout nonsense on anything he wishes. He is nothing but a fraud and a simple 15 minutes research on his credentials reveals all this.
@@rudrasingh883 My academic profile is much better than his.I do not hold a 'Mtech degree in Mechanical Eng' from some mickey mouse engineering college like this fraudster. Do not even compare this scamster to me. I would die rather than write such substandard non peer reviewed research papers and call myself a scientist.
@@rudrasingh883Any one can write and publish a research paper in india, do you know how many research papers are published everyday. Most of them are useless
I don't know about specific claims of chavda but history isn't an exact science like natural sciences. Concensus of historians can not hold same value as say newton's laws.
Actually the only difference is historical evidence isn't as direct and straightforward as evidence in physics. But as far as consensus is concerned. It's the same no matter which empirical field you take
@@scienceisdopeit is most definitely not the same as in STEM Science, science is based on hard facts and empirical evidence whereas Historiography needs Understanding of Mythology linguistics Genealogy Anthropology which are subjective and non empirical sciences to form a Hypothesis that have a lot of grey area and nuance unlike Hard science which does not have nuance. They fundamentally are not the same fields
@@scienceisdope social science theories can only be considered as conjecture in natural sciences. Hence facts ascertained from these theories can't hold same value. I agree about consensus, it would hold same value in respective field that it is best knowledge we have. But we assign certain importance to consensus not just on principle, but from its utility. Basically science makes aeroplane fly. I am post modernist-ish on social issues.
So delighted to see this video pop up in my feed! I've been waiting for Pranav to tackle this guy's claims. But, I couldn't help but chuckle before hitting play, realizing the irony of our shared name in this context. LOL. Kudos for the fantastic breakdown, Pranav! On the topic of Abhijit's ambiguity about God versus his confidence in enunciating very clear views about 'aliens' using the same rationale, I'd be inclined to cut him some slack in that regard. Having identified as an atheist for nearly two decades, I've come to recognize the delicate nature of challenging someone's core beliefs. Often, these beliefs form the bedrock of their identity. And sometimes, it's more compassionate to let people journey through their beliefs at their own pace rather than confront them. Keep up the insightful work, Pranav, and cheers to more enlightening content!
Being hopeful is good, being hopeful of finding something supernatural or observing some sort of energy that can be beneficial for Earth is itself a big inspiration for any scientist, especially in the field of astrophysics.
Sir. 🙏 Thank you for this video. This Chavda guy while not all bad is just getting ridiculous for the past one year or so. Thanks and please sir you have a Coffee at Starbucks 😝 but on it may i recommend Blue Tokai or Flying Squirrel. They are good if you do it french press.
"chavda" in malayalam means telling someone to die, in that case the name he has he really deserved because its like telling abhijith chavda as it translates to abhijith go die 🤣🤣
My question is that why do we need to have invented modern tech in ancient times, and have some grand ancient mysteries, in order for us to be proud of who we are? I am proud of the cave paintings and mud huts and sacred groves and classical dances and folk tales, because they showcase the vibrant culture and social richness of our past. Why you need to chase these grand claims and feel some weird sense of superiority to feel connected to our roots?
@@Ameyiscool definitely doesn't progress from a widespread culture of patriarchy, racism, casteism, homophobia, bullying, paan-spitting, littering, religious fanaticism, and personality cults either.
I am a regular Abhijit Chavda viewer and an agnostic (not atheist). The thing you said about him being ‘neutral on aliens and hopeful about god’ felt a little incorrect because hope means the desire for a particular thing to happen. AC, me, you and everyone else of scientific temperament is almost certain of existence of extra terrestrial life (statistically speaking) and me being an agnostic, I take a neutral stance on the existence of god, a stance of uncertainty. From all of AC’s talks I’ve heard, he seems to be an agnostic too. When he says that he’s hopeful that there is a god, he means that he ‘wishes that there is a god’ (it’s his desire), because a universe with a god is a lot less intimidating that a universe without a god
Pranav probably sees a great opportunity at hitting AC to attract attention.... A writer of Alexander's time (I have to check the name) wrote about Amatrachus ---> which was Greek of the then king of gangetic plains (Magadha) named DhanaNanda the last Nanda ruler ... and said The forces of Alexander refused to move beyond Indus after the treaty with Puru.... learning about the 200000 foot soldiers and 20000 cavalry with 5000 elephants.... of The Nanda's... The court of Nanda's were having some of the finest sages who dealt with Sun Moon and Stars calculations... But Pranav is so baised in his science love that he is blinded by that towards the complexity reality presents.... Possibilities are king and rationale is good until it engulfs the raw intelligence.
Anyone who listened to podcast will get that he is just wishing that there is a god. But looks like instead of listening to it people are taking everything at face value and commenting 'finally someone debunked AC' etc. From the day I was recommend this channel I knew there would be more political tribalism than scientific discussion in the comments.
@@khosrowanushirwan7591 right, I like Pranav and what he is doing, but he isn’t perfect (like every other human). But still he is way better than his viewers, most of his viewers condemn ‘scientific authority’ and then flock towards a scientific authority themselves, irony.
It is interesting that this "construction of Daniel Cells" doesn't talk about the experiences the rishi had in using it. Like when Leyden jar was invented, it was literally about getting shocks, and then about generating electricity. Heck electrolysis wasn't even invented before Leyden Jars.
The "atom" of Kanada is far from being an actual atom. firstly, there is no mention of size of this "atom" in the original vaisheshika sutra. because it a was mystical concept not physics but later texts have given several inconsistent definitions of Paramāṇu: in one definition, one paramāṇu is 1/30th of the size of the smallest speck of dust visible to naked eye. there are living beings smaller than that. there is 90 billion atoms in an E. coli bacterium in another definition, a paramāṇu is 1/32768th size of an barley cone. barley cone is about the size of 1ml of water. there is a trillion atoms in one ml of water. basically, none of these are even close to being the concept of atom we have today.
@Prodigious147 yep.. why these people wants to live in imagination...non existing things etc..i dont understand them.. why they are in mass numbers?is it our cultural problem or a biological inability?
You should have a debate with Chavda about this. I hope he will stay away from pseudoscientific claims so that his actual expertise, if any, will become more valuable.
@@krox477 But Abhijit would dominate the debate, he's really impressively well read, he can give you reasons for any claim you'd ask him, It's just these podcasters like Ranveer whom I'd want to stfu with the dumb questions
@Prodigious147 Abhijit Chavda. has just a `BSc in physics from the college, his father used to teach. He has no idea of science or history but has a big ego and inferiority complex being the child of a physics professor and could not make anything in life. If you read the papers published by him in journal, you will always see his father as co-author and most papers are just 2-3 pages of salami slicing.
None of theirs 33 crore gods showed up during covid 19 & even the devotees were scared to visit temples 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂covid-19 exposed all types of gods n godmen 😂
3:40 This is an outright appeal to authority fallacy. Hiis criterion to call a theory proposed by someone wrong is that it is not accepted by majority of scholars of the field, and not pointing out the particular flaws in the aspects of the theory. Lol, that shows what kind of "rationalism" he has. Why don't you go ahead and refute Abhijeet's Out of India Theory by giving arguments rather than making an appeal to the authority of consensus of most historians? Simply calling anybody's theories "conspiracy theories" is not a refutation, Abhijeet provides rational arguments to propose his theory and refute Aryan Invasion Theory rather than simply calling it a conspiracy theory.
goes to show that even though you do not have evidence or any sort of research you can say something that the masses would like to hear and believe to a point that they would literally try to deflect any debunking against it
You are using arguments from authority to claim his positions on history are false instead of debating the arguments he presented, by saying it’s not accepted by experts. In fields like history, there are clear political agendas, we know a lot of artifacts are not available or researched and just because academics tell you something, doesn’t mean it’s true. The consensus of many things has been wrong historically over and over again.
now i understand how these Sanskrit books are made I'm so dumb that i forgot we live in 2023 where you can translate English to Sanskrit on your fingertip
@@VaibhavKarthik why would you be "staunch" in your beliefs in god? 2ndly if pranav can change your mind between faith and blind faith then you are probably not "staunch". Look up what "staunch" means. Also yeah, I don't know how and why your caste was relevant to your original comment but it seems like a performance to include it. Byeeeeee!
@@akshayde first of all there's a difference between "helped me change my mind" And "draw a line". Secondly brahmins have comparatively more blind beliefs than others.
When AC talks about scientific topic he does a fairly good job of representing facts. But hishistory knowledge is mind boggling I once heard him say that Akbar is buried in Delhi when it's a known fact that He is Buried in Sikandarabad near Agra. He has no credibility when it comes to history and Beer Biceps has done a huge disservice by allowing him his platform multiple times.
@@anchitbose4151 I'm talking about real one. Where his body was buried and exhumed by Jaat forces and burned. Mr. Chavda claimed that it was buried in Delhi where Sikhs exhumed it and threw the bones to the dogs. which is absolutely false.
Pranav, he doesn't have any expertise in History as well. History doesn't judge people's personalities in retrospect. He uses historical facts (sometimes misinformation) to forward his agenda. He doesn't have any background in History.
Well... I guess you haven't seen the whole video. He never commented on history in the entire video. He commented only on those parts which intersected with science. On the contrary, he commended Mr. Chadwa for his rational answers to the illogical questions asked by him.
@@harishnair4252 definately he has no background in history and same goes with ramchandra guha , romila thapar , irfan habib n all 😂 And RTIs are revealing propaganda after propaganda filled in the ncerts 😂 just like ncerts claimed many thing abt qutub minar 😂 and satvahanas ...actually textual history of india is never got the upgrade of current findings ...
@@Diasaster History doesn't care about names. All the claims should be corroborated with archaeological evidence and reliable historical documents. People don't believe historians but the evidence they provide. Historian's words are not proof just like exaggerated folk lores cannot be considered as historical evidence.
You don't have to debunk him. He started nicely but now he made a blunder about himself by making weird statements. He is not even a researcher neither knows how it works. He is just another TH-camr with topic "History". He mocks current research and then gives his theories which aren't true either.
@@alpha-vs1fx and that doesn't mean physicist or a historian. You have to produce research paper to have the tag. He has only done Masters not PhD. Neither he works for research.
I have nothing after watching that I am like it is okay until he is hopeful but problem if he teaches that hopeful as reality to other. As long as he doesn't accept it as reality and adds as a check I am gonna agree with him 😊
It's shocking that this Chhevda guy speaks more about history and politics than science while he's supposed to have scientific study as his educational background.
How can anyone be proud of their nationality, religion, caste or creed? None of these are the result of one's choice. All of us are accidents of history and are born without our consent. So what is there to be proud of? Yes of course you could proud of your own achievements in a particular field of your choice, because that's your work and you should be proud of that. Being proud of one's nationality is different from being a responsible citizen of their country (which includes not spitting on public places, not violating traffic rules, showing respect to fellow citizens irrespective of religion, colour, gender, caste and class and helping one another in need) which many don't want to be.
Because of conditioning since birth, these people are indoctrinated since birth using different binaries like religion, caste, nationality, language etc, these ignorant melieus then form the botnets for the psychopaths at the top, who use them to maintain hegemony and control over the system, this is the reason they promote culture, religion, irrationality, nationalism, language and all kinds of useless constructs, media tunes their biases and programs them to love or hate groups according to the whims of the apex apes!
He said Rishi Kanad came up with Theory. Isn't theory a hypothesis and legitimate approach even if the lack of technological advances don't allow to build experiments?
Hmm. It doesn't really make sense. For example I can claim that 100 or 1000s year later humanity would walk on another planet. I just Don't have enough technological material to actually achieve it. Does this mean i invented inter-planetary travel?
@@bullymaguire5838 strange argument! More recent example, Machine Learning methods of data science theoretically were developed in 1980s but could not be used until recently due to lack of computational power, does it mean machine learning theory was wrong? Theory wud almost always precede practice....
@@pulkit8628 yes I also believe so but you're confusing vague mentioning with established theories. For example we know a man making mechanical wings and flying towards the sun is pretty popular story but that doesn't mean the writer should be given credit for making aeroplanes or jetpack. Hypothesis have been found about most things since ancient times but they didn't gave Amy exact formula, or evidence that's why they're not credited. I'm pretty sure millions of people thought about gravity before newton but none of them gave rules, formula etc to actually prove it.
@@bullymaguire5838 my question how do you know the theory by Rishi Kanad is vague? Or it's just a story? The depth of philosophical thought is most of our ancient philosophies is mind boggling... Just see Yog school of philosophical thought...
Hi pranav, just wanted to let you know that in ajeet Bharti's video he didn't talk about hope like at 19:05, but said there definitely is cause there's dark energy and dark matter... argument from ignorance from his part here I'm not sure why he's being meek..
I hope you go to a podcast and say everything 100% logical and correct. Eveyone has their own interests on different conspiracies and their ideas and beliefs on a subject matter and there is a 100% chance that half of the things he talked was false but i don't think someone sitting in a room should suggest about what the other person said is wrong or right.
@@rohittekchandani5720 There's nothing wrong with that and if he had analyzed Abhijit chavda video from his channel then i would be fine but not in podcast. people say number of things and not everything is correct. if we go by your logic he shoul analyze every podcast in the world cause not a single podcast may be 100% right
I would love for this man invite him in a podcast and actually interview him. Abhijit is a well of knowledge and i would love for this guy to interview him and actually get his biases removed.
Support me at:
Buymeacoffee: buymeacoffee.com/scienceisdope
Patreon: www.patreon.com/scienceisdope_
YT Membership: th-cam.com/channels/g--ENXdDpXh5LyLigolg2g.htmljoin
UPI: scienceisdope@icici (QR Code available on www.scienceisdope.com/support )
Make a video on Oppenheimer and his views on Hinduism and Gita
Overall, how would you rate Abhijit chavda since i listen to him at times
@@Sartaj_1 I think he's good tbh, this video was a bit unnecessary, like I have a mind and I can say what is not scientific and what not 😅
@ScienceIsDope : I liked this one Pranav. Well I think what Chavda meant by 95% is basically about Dark matter, and he turned it into a wishful thinking where he said he hoped its good energy, or God.
Thing is people might think Dark Matter or Dark energy is negative energy or something bad. While in reality it is the matter which we expect to be out there which accounts for the gravitational attraction and rotation of planets and stars but yet we are not able to see that matter or interact with it. There is nothing positive or negative about energy. This is just stupidity to belive energy is positive or negative. People who are deep into spiritualism might hold these views.
Here Dark = Unseen + Uninteracted.
Keep up the great work. We need the merch now. Definitely buying something for sure.
Hey @ScienceIsDope is there any book you may suggest on logical fallacies? I hear many influencers quote logical fallacies but I couldn't find a book on it yet.
"Be proud of your ancestors & traditions but not at the expense of your reason & rationality !" Well Put, Pranav 👏
I would say to the youth that they should be proud of their own achievements instead of their ancestorswhose actions or achievements have little to no evidence. This ideology of feeling pride for other's achievements is the core cause that 80% of youth are now unhireable by top companies. The youth is busy feeling pride for fake things which nobody can prove or disprove. Its a time waste and dumbing down of the youth that the elites have created using social media.
@@T3Rmin4LCuRi0siTyvery well said, tbh I haven't heard truer words than that for a long time. Thank you!
@@T3Rmin4LCuRi0siTy You are absolutely right. What's worse is that even when studying past accomplishments, we often just chalk up the credit to the community or nation. This is not evil on its own, but often we do this while ignoring hte individual contributor. For example, all Indians know that numerical zero was first conceived in India, but how many can name the individual scholar who made the discovery?
Ok if you have guts, criticize Islam, Christian why their religious texts are history and ours is myth.That would be some video give it a shot.
@@T3Rmin4LCuRi0siTypeople are proud of thier ancestors because they were indoctrinated since first grade to be ashamed of thier ancestors thier culture, that thier ancestors were loosers and the culture was a foreign culture not your own. The more newer research is conducted the more these false indoctrination is falling apart, our ancestors were the only ones to fend off Islamic invasions for more than 300 years while great nations like Persia fell in 30 years, it was our culture that we spread around the globe and not that Aryan invasion BS. This is the reason people are proud, because they were forced to be ashamed for a false reason before
Let's not ignore the stupidity of those young Men.
We all missed that observation. It's sad
fr 😂😂why are they asking him those questions, as if he had a research done on it,lol.if the viwers wanted such answers they could have watched a random video on aliens existence on yt, i feel like they are just dumb kids without any education background, just targeting the vulnerable audience[ we know who the audience are..🤡🤡]with random dumb questions.
They are decently smart. They have seen what works on TH-cam India and are following the same track as BeerBiceps. Their thumbnail and title includes all the conspiratory catch phrases to lure in Ranveer's and Chavda's established audience base
@@1Satyam1that's true
not stupid, just shameless. trying to exploit the dumb population.
Be proud of your ancestors and Traditions But not at the expense of reason and rationality
-Pranav Radhakrishna
We should be proud of the first fish which evolved as a land animal@@kingflockthewarrior202
@@kingflockthewarrior202😂😂💪
But why should be anybody be proud of anything they themselves have not achieved ever in their life
One should have pride only for their own accomplishments and not of others
@@theunbeatable728 While personal achievements are a significant source of pride, there's another dimension to consider. People often take pride in their cultural heritage or their ancestors' contributions to society. This pride is more about acknowledging and appreciating one's roots, history, and the collective progress made by their community. It doesn't necessarily replace personal accomplishments but adds another layer of emotional connection and identity. Just like we can feel proud of a friend's success, even if we didn't directly achieve it ourselves, this broader pride is about celebrating the accomplishments of a larger group that we're part of. It's a way to value both personal achievements and our connection to a wider community.
@@theunbeatable728i think its more about gratitude
You have actually treated Chavda with a lot of respect.
+1
More than he deserves.
This guy is not an credited historian. He's a physicist, and that "one" study he co-authored is not even peer-reviewed.
He's a hack, plain and simple.
Every person deserves respect
@@besthing-hg1zpGive me one example of that.
@@besthing-hg1zp what do you mean by light is same speed in all directions. Light does travel at the same speed in all directions. What's wrong with that?
Glad you did this video Pranav and gave a reasonable take. That podcast showed up in my recommended and I was like, "Oh shit, Pranav should pounce on this." And you did! Thanks!
Haha of course!
sir aren't you the one from newslaundry
@@4m0d Yeah. He is.
@@Astronaut430 why he left?
🎉
Abhijit is historian, archeologist, physicist, genetist, engineer, defence expert, political analyst, social scientist and legal expert..... His new expertise is astronomy
'Alien, Fairy, Dragon, ...a God, etc.' ...these can be good addition in that list. 🤔
What do you think?
@@warrior_of_liberation a modern Rishi, lord Brahma himself revealed him all the knowledge he has.
@@Cray-wilder How do you know he is not Brahma himself? 😏😂
@@warrior_of_liberation because he has hair like a sage
he has a physics degree.
bro very few people have the scientific temperament like you. it should increase in our country to be a progressive country.
Thats our constitutional duty, but yeah we have government Ayurveda clinic and homeopathic clinics. Jokes on us i guess.
Chavda is a big Tunni scientist- ones who try whitwash or justify their religion, culture by science.
@@sorenutpal6091 why you are spamming everywhere 😂 butthurted of Mr. Chavda
@@hariprasath6120 what is your science idiots that's just business of west nothing scientific in it
Lol. Are you talking about this Byju scamster?
Abhijit Chavda =Johnny sins Cuz he is Physicists,astronomer, geographer, Geopolitics, Historian, Rocket scientist, Weapon expert, Lawyer etc 😂😂😂
still not better than duggal sahab dhruv tatti
@Prodigious147 look i am a rationalist,i am not a right or left wing, i am neutral. but you gotta say that dhruv rathee is somewhat biased isn't it?
Dhruv Rathi uses well researched academic paper to show his point but people like Abhijit Chavda who only says "There are evidences" but never bring them forward.
@Prodigious147 I am just saying that by his logic if Abhijit chavada is Johny sins, than dhruv must bhi johny sins pro max, just use some of your analytical power, for you anyone who is anti congress, aap is irrational, same leftist logic which deals in binary
@@amreshsingh3763 re chutiye first of all dhruv rathi sorry dhruv tatti only shows those paper whose political ideology is leftist and anpadh ganwaar have u ever watch abhijit chavda discussions with IISC Professor Arindhan Ghosh ex IAS Ved veer arya prominent Historian Meenakshi Jain the amount of knowledge these people have dhruv tatti cant learn in his whole life
and chutiya kids like u believe in his papers lol
Dear fellow Indians, please wake up for the sake of our future generations. Our country is falling into a pit.
Only you seems in a pit
There will be no generation in future 😂
Yes, by taking advice from a Byju scamster.
@@shanuyok615 work on your English first
United we fall , United we stand 😂
If we did invent the batteries and aeroplanes, where is the archeological evidence for it? What were the applications of those? And why did such an advanced civilization lose all that knowledge? Lol.
Bcoz MuzMuz /s
I wrote a book where ancient humans used facebook 10000 years ago.. the book is still in my hand but nobody can find the evidence
Not just evidence as big as a battery or aeroplanes , find me something as small as an alloy metal or something.
Why aren't we thinking logically?If flight was invented in India, why can't our archaeologist find material remains flight engine or other parts. How can they design so called " flying machines" even before discovering correct fuel. Also, the world moves forward not backward, if we were flying jets and curing cancer in ancient India, in 2016 we could've been vacationing on Mars.
I did like to quote The Social Network (2010):
"You know, you really don't need a forensics team to get to the bottom of this. If you guys were the inventors of Facebook, you'd have invented Facebook."
Vedas and Upanishads are work of fiction at best just like all other religious books are.
@@jeanettewee8805 if you read rigved hindi translation you will see lots of things they are talking about inventing and what they need to make their life easy rather than formula or blueprints etc
Sage ask his student: what kind of vehicles workers should make
The kid replies a vehicle which can be useful both in water and air for transportation
It will make their life easy and all
Rigved is not something science book but its a book acknowledging things they have
Thanking god for making such knowledgeable texts and all
Thanking for sun jissey andhera door hota hai aur crops ache hote hai
Etc etc it mentions lots of achievements
That basically shows that they had such things
Indian traditions was oral
Writing culture came later
Vedas and puranas are just acknowledgement
Real knowledge was in shastras
Bro u left no gap for trollers 😂
Bro he is astrophysicist, historian, archaeologist, and geopolitical expert without formal education in any of the above disciplines 😂
Like modi 😂
With the advent of the internet and the ability to read, there's nothing stopping you from being an expert on topics
From Chavda and Chavda University! Do some authentic research and the share your pearls of wisdom 🙂
Oh..he is physist..
@@PHYSICS-sz1ns yeah a fake one from Chavda and Chavda university.
I always wondered that why people are not doubting chavda.
Exactly.. he pretends to be an expert on everything.. just like me after 3 pegs..😂
Exactly
@@japsahibdhillon5014me too man i can talk about alot stuff when I'm drunk but that doesn't make me an expert
ikr my dad sent me one of his videos in which he said "studies of science is small when compared to philosphy or spiritualism" i cringed so hard
Because he speaks and asks people to see the evidence themselves
Not bla bla bla like others with Full of confidence
AC is like Jhonny Sins, he is a historian, quantum physicist, mathematician, indologist etc etc but none of them in reality.
The guy talks about pushing Viana in his history channels the guy is only brainwashing
@@nikhilhembrom8952he say about a claim not actually agreeing on it. He always been neutral 😅
Who else is revisiting just to see chavda fans cry in comments 😂
Good one!
Rice bag spotted.
Quite like the classic Jekyll and Hyde, Abhijit Chavda exhibits the persona of a man of science, logic, and rationality, yet flips into a conspiracy theorist when it comes to the history and culture of his own country.
Bullshit He says it with proof
@@saikatghosh9073 Bhai age giya scientific evidence kake bole por, abhijit chavda moto manushder kache kono empirical evidence nai, r jodi thakto tahole oh ekhane podcast chalato na. Oh sudhu bose bose selective argument daye ebong tar poripekhite nijer motamot prodan kore.
@@agnosticatheist4093Bhai please listen to all the podcast with Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chawda, if you have the logical answers to his point then say it. He asks it to the most scholars of history but no one till now, proves him incorrect, only persons like science is dope says that the scholars don't believe him. But it is only opinion of science is dope's creator, no facts or evidence to prove him incorrect.
@@nicesed Apologies, but I don't lend my viewership to channels like Sanjay Dixit's or any extremist outlet without good reason.I have watched most of Abhijit Chavda's videos from which I have formed my opinion, not because someone else told me to, or based on a single video.
Now, let's move on to the main issue. The burden of proof lies on the individual making the claim. Given that these claims have been made by Abhijit Chavda, it's his responsibility to substantiate them. There are numerous basic flaws in Abhijit Chavda's narrative, which could be exposed with proper cross-questioning by any rational mind.It's like you're running alone in a race, and everyone else is just cheering you on.
Science necessitates robust empirical evidence - no quantity of logic can substitute this. Even Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity had to be validated through rigorous testing. Simply offering logic, referencing books, presenting mathematical calculations, or accusing an individual or organization does not constitute evidence. Science thrives on empirical evidence, which I regret to say, seems to have eluded Mr Chavda's purview in his discussions and podcasts to date.
@@nicesed yeah science is wrong. but abhijit chavda who believes Lalitaditya Muktapida conquered all of india and the world like alexander (ignoring the existence of other kingdoms throughout india and asia) is right.
this is when the kannauj triangle wars started. forget about the world, he completely ignored the history of india. yeah, the caliphate lost to Lalitaditya Muktapida and the Romans just never mentioned such an important event.
"Be proud of your ancestors & traditions but not at the expense of your reason & rationality"
Kanad was most probably referring to the dust particles that we see early morning when sun ray enters through ventilators
No he wasn't
Key word most probably ??
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Were you his brother or smthng😂
Chavda is an "expert" in almost every field. 😂
That's called Polymath
not jokers and trollers like you
Who can't do anything😂😂😂
@@shanuyok615 well then it's a disgrace considering his silly statements which just end up as "my India bestest".
@@spuriusscapula4829yeah... What about Rathee and Akash banerjee.
I guess they are legit expert in every field... right?
@@ANO-123 I'm pretty sure they don't go around beating their chest spouting conspiracies saying "my India besht".
@@spuriusscapula4829 well.....they do.
watch them carefully Plus their hypocrisy is unbelievable.
I know a huge chunk of people in India don't like India being get praise or get credited for its achievement in any field.
It's pretty normal and common.
abhijit chavda is to geopolitics
that arnold Schwarzenegger is to
Bharatanatyam
That's why consults experts😊
dude can't form a sentence and is talking about geopoltics
Not true. His geopolitical analysis tend to be spot on. He is however a very unreliable historian. Both are different.
@@sawedoffshotgun8462not true
Most of the time his view on other countries'politics is too shallow and he always talks about the past(40 years ago, 50 years ago something happened) to make sense of the present which is completely irrelevant of the topic.
@@saptarsi7868well it's relevant Duh
Geography shapes history
It is not just in the field of science, Chevda peddles lots of half-truth, biased opinions about many historical topics also. These people along with that BeerBiceps with whom Chevda regularly collabs, have gotten their popularity because we Indian audience have a lack genuine research oriented inquisitive mind.
I see you are butthurted because of him
As an atheist myself the content you produce is very enlightening and based on scientific evidence. I started watching your channel since March 2023 and I've learned alot from your videos. The way you present the information is very easy to understand I've recommended your channel to lot of my friends. Keep up the good work and thank you.❤
The future belongs to the atheist 🔥💪
Are u an upper caste?
@@rajivhumain 🙄 Why would a social construct matter with what I think is morally superior than the traditional religion which is forced upon us.
@@_Mephisto because I haven't seen many upper caste be atheist. That's all bro!
@@_Mephistodude He was simply asking which category you belong to: OBC, SC, ST, or the unfortunate miserable general category
Hey Pranav, invite Ranveer Allahabadia on your podcast, it'll be so fun seeing you interacting with him and him just nodding his head😂😂
Edit : like Duh? Ik he won't come, I'm just joking, imagining it happen.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ranveer won't come
There's no way he'll come to the podcast
Bro he is a podcaster who is there to make Money from the content his guest provide what will he come and talk when people critize him i really just can't do anything but laugh
Pranav: Lets talk science.
Ranveer: Bro have you seen Yeti?
Pranav: No
Ranveer: Ok bro do you practice no-fap
Pranav: No
Ranveer: Ok lets talk Geopolitics bro... bro brrooooo
Pranav: Bhakk
The whole video was amazing, found it really to the point. But I have to say that a person can have an opinion outside of consensus and have his own reasons to think that way. Aren't there a lot of examples in history of how general consensus were proven wrong upon further research or findings... So I think that's a topic of discussion rather than calling it "wishful thinking".
Also the thing about " hoping for a supernatural being" is actually the wishing part. It's like saying "Everyone dies someday but I hope immortality is possible" not like he would rather believe in immortality over greater longevity. I think you misunderstood that part a bit. But I agree with everything else. It was a great video with real constructive and meaningful criticism.
Yup there have been many such incidents. The most popular and tragic one happened to Galileo. The general consensus was earth is the centre and sun and other planets revolve around it but Galileo claim which was against the consensus that sun is the centre was proven right later.
@@Samir12357 Bro I think u forgot to mention that Galileo had a telescope and his findings were backed up by observational evidence. It wasn't out of the blue that he got the idea of heliocentrism. He was among the first group of ppl to ever use a telescope for his research.
@@adhishwartak4766 the problem is pranav used scientific method logic where we directly observe the evidences and even 1 counter evidence is enough to discard our theory but unlike in history we always find evidences against our theory and based on them we make our interpretation. And there are all our hypothesis, that we find even 2 eminent historians differing on some points.
@@Samir12357That wasn't galelios opinion but observation
Anyone can have any opinion
Be it majoritarian opinion or minoritarian opinion it would be accepted in culture but not in science
Fun fact: Pranav is an alien that's why he's opposing those ideas 😂
😐
i second this
AMONG US 😂😂😂
Also, a very good f*ck buddy of LiverDoc 😆
he opposes everything🤣
He's the type of historian who creates history
Literally 😂
Note - the synonym 'fabricate' is in use here. 😂
Everyone is a historian except jokers like you 😂😂😂
😂😂 for a sec i was like historians are not supposed to create history.. and then oh yeah sarcasm 😂
@@phaneendhraajaythota1025 Iundbhakts like you and this youtubers who think books and school history is absolutely necessary and Omly Truth 🤣😂🤣😂
🤣
waiting for those who will say "u dont have right to say anything about him, he is astrophysicist"
He is not an astrophysicist
Don't think that's a fair point people should be able to criticize whomever but haven't seen a single person make that appeal to authority, rw are doing good job making points not making fallacious statements like Dhruv rathee
@@abhinavgokhale6917 what good points RW made?
@@abhinavgokhale6917 And you bringing up dhruv name is enough proof that you think he is some kind of authority in left wing.
@@booksanimeenthusiast What good points did left wing make? I can name Anand ranganathan, J Sai deepak. Even these two make u left wingers run away with tail bw your legs. And Dhruv isn't a LW figure even though he has the largest Media channel lol okay
Pseudo Science makes me sick.
if beer biceps is Afghanistan Realhit is north korea
🤣🤣🤣
Bruh 💀😂😂
The way one of the hosts on the podcasts goes "so believing in evidence is your ideology"💀💀💀
😂😂
they're cashing on stupid audience with cheap internet
You should collab with him & talk about science & rationality would be very interesting to see people of different ideologies having a conversation on same topic
@@user-nx9cr2wy5w everybody has political biases even the most centrist or neutral person, they are either kinda left or right.
@@Indianpsychonaut No you can always choose to be in center if you have enough understanding.
That requires research, not stories.
Abhijit chavda is just the younger, evolved and updated version of rajiv malhotra. Both these guys love to talk about things that are nowhere near their area of expertise, that too with a lot of confidence. Especially rajiv needs some dawkins treatment that deepak chopra recieved on stage.
So by that logic pranav shouldn't speak on medicine as he's not a doctor.
@@anchitbose4151his background is in science and teaching science, so yeah, he does
@@A_n.t_i.s_o.c_i.a_lhis background is in electrical engineering not pharmacy 🤦♂️
@@anchitbose4151teaching includes biology, and again, all of the stuff he debunks, he gives his sources, whuch are yk? PUBLIC INFORMATION
@@A_n.t_i.s_o.c_i.a_l pharmacy is a very specialised field. Class 10 bio won't help you beyond a certain level. Lol
Abhijit Chavda might've have been fairly rational, but let's not forget he's also a prominent RW ideologue. And ppl who use logic to justify bigotry are the most harmful kinds of intellectuals.
💯
@pertyfleur can you tell your real name? Just curious
+1
@@suyashverma15can you show us all you ass....
Just curious
Oh wait.... You're already doing that since what you're doing is basically shitting in comments section by asking for national/religious/caste identification.
Abhijit Chavda like most RW ideologues is a Faker. He publishes papers on physics which obviously are written by his father and publishes in non-descript journals and claims himselves as a physicist, but talks about Anthropology.
The Chavda supporters should atleast counter the video with counter proofs and not painting the patriotism picture.
No need to counter because i don't waste time on youtube like you😂😂😂
@@shanuyok615 so replying to every Chavda comment is not waste of time? Oh wait that's productive work for you, probably gives your life higher meaning or maybe pays your bills.
Keep grinding mate.
@@thesmilingtitan replying me in midnight is very important and productive for you right LOL 😂🤣
@@shanuyok615 keep spamming.
You'll eventually earn enough for a decent breakfast or a bottle of cheap alcohol.
@@thesmilingtitan i don't do any of these you idiot 😂😂 grow up and see who's spamming raally
Abhijit chavda is conspiriest pseudo historian too . He spread lot of lies about Sanskrit and Vedas stuff
Don't people get tired of "Our Ancient sages knew everything"
No
Indians have a deep rooted insecurity of being Indians. These people just tap into that and kaboom our sages become inventors of them all.
Of course the sages didn't know everything, nor anyone will. Sages discovered who they are rather than comprehending what everything is or will be as their main goals of their lives. Whoever said they knew everything are ignorant.
Exactly!! like okay there were some extraordinary individuals, but didn’t every major civilisation had some? Its the present of the country that matters more.
No.
I don’t see anything to be tired of.
Pranav, we would like to see you in "The Seen & The Unseen" Podcast with Amit Verma.
Acharya Prashant who is a Vedic Scholar and have good knowledge of Vedas has mentioned many times that Vedas have no mention of science or scientific theories. Also Vedas have no mention of temples and idol worship.
A very mature critique I would say....Your presentation has improved ten folds
man...i have book..which is about scientific history of India..And its written by one of former RSS leader in Gujarat..(80:20 =psuedo science: factzzz)...and irony is that my sister got it from Gujarat biotech research centre 😅😅😂
RSS hv hijacked hindu religion..they are harming hinduism more...they are literally killing the reasoning , rationality of majority indians..
They just use religion for power
Man i love to read it 😂 what's he name of book
@@emptiness3390 book by Suresh Soni - Indian glorious scientific tradition.
Problem? You don't think Indians can create scientific discoveries? Self hate is big with this one.
@@mandippatel3178 Read IIT Professor Bhaskar Kamble book The Inseparable Seed
He is expert in everything 😂. People are putting all of their life to be expert in particular subject but he is becoming famous by omitting his half ass knowledge
His main objective is a cultural change, where he wants people to embrace their own culture, by knowing about the history the knowledge that we had, and using that to make our nation stronger. We need a big economy, a strong army to do that, but for all that to happen we need to embrace our own culture first and not just romanticize about other cultures.
When you want this level of a cultural shift you might have to get your hands DIRTY.
Watch his videos and you will find this pattern.
Btw what science is dope is talking about, is also spot on, but both of them have different objectives.
@@rishabhdiwan6928 We need stronger economy and not culture TBH. Even gulf countries have strict culture but not all are having stronger and consistent economy. Culture also takes out freedom so please study properly what basic schools tried to teach us.
@@sskamble6758 We do need our culture as mucha s economy because, think of the music today, how much of it is actual classical music, don't you think it's a knowledge we need to preserve. This is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of what our culture has to offer, there are more things that are top tier in our culture and can be used into translating into a stronger economy. Think of Yoga it's a huge these days in the west, it came from India. KNOWING HISTORY AND OUR OWN CULTURE IS REALLY IMPORTANT. think about it.
@@rishabhdiwan6928 then it will be like house of card made on lies which crumble easily
@@rupeshmagar-db9qmWhat lies? I am not getting? Think of a unicultural world, it will be really boring. Think of Japanese animes, think of western fantasies like LOTR and elder scrolls etc these all are the result of a multicultural world out of which money was made. I am not getting whaat is wrong in preserving our culture. Indians have been long kept away from the truths of how great we really were and forced into embracing westerns culture, now is the time for the truth to come out. I am glad that people like Abhijit chavda are doing it. The main point is people should be intelligent enough to understand the objective of the person they are listening to, and than everything will be clear.
The Egyptians literally laid out how they created the pyramids, in carvings and drawings.
This ambiguity of how the pyrimads were build has been debunked
@@1-_-I debunked by whom
12:33 abhijit is perfectly right here. Rishi Kanad's philosophical idea of atomism is quantum in nature.
The definition of quantum is
"A quantum (plural: quanta) is the smallest discrete unit of a phenomenon"
You are misrepresenting his views and connecting as if he is talking of modern quantum physics
Indians discovered teleportation, quantum computing, cryonics, quantum time travel and computing several millennia ago.
I know coz it was written in the Vedas 1:35
😂😂😂😂...then who destroyed it...why indians were slave for 1200 years .
There is no idol worship in vedas..follows that too..❤
@@deception6666 sarcasm bro sarcasm
He's a gold medalist WhatsApp professor. 😅
Just like this joker youtuber😂😂 and his supporters
You are right bhai
Realhit guys be like , “cmon man say those bullshit that you say at BeerBiceps’ podcast. Give us some masala”😂😂😂
Thanks!
Here take my money please for the good you are doing for humanity:)
Thank you so much! This will go a long way!
18:28 I think you could give him the last one as he makes it clear it is wishful thinking on his part which makes it no more than something he wants should be true but clearly states might not be.
Avijit Chavda is a problematic person. He’s very very biased, and makes crude conclusions from real data.
Yeah finally someone is talking about WhatsApp University historian.
He was an astrophysicist, i think thats where he gets his scientific temper from
Ghanta astrophysicist. He doesn't have a PhD, works at some research institute which only exists on paper, and only has shady af publications. All his research is published with another Chavda guy (who is actually a physicist and possibly a relative). None of their published work is peer-reviewed or have a shared of scientific acceptance beyond the minds of these two guys.
What's most probably happening is that he is latching on to the other Chavda guy who actually knows physics to publish far-fetched theories so that he can claim to be an 'astrophysicist', use that to gain some credibility on TH-cam which in turn allows him to spout nonsense on anything he wishes. He is nothing but a fraud and a simple 15 minutes research on his credentials reveals all this.
Yes ,at the basement of his house.
@@subhadeepghosh3961 but unlike you keyboard warriors he has actually written research papers in his basement
@@rudrasingh883 My academic profile is much better than his.I do not hold a 'Mtech degree in Mechanical Eng' from some mickey mouse engineering college like this fraudster. Do not even compare this scamster to me. I would die rather than write such substandard non peer reviewed research papers and call myself a scientist.
@@rudrasingh883Any one can write and publish a research paper in india, do you know how many research papers are published everyday. Most of them are useless
Science is Dope for sure 😊
We need to have a debate platform and debunk such people publically
I don't know about specific claims of chavda but history isn't an exact science like natural sciences.
Concensus of historians can not hold same value as say newton's laws.
Actually the only difference is historical evidence isn't as direct and straightforward as evidence in physics. But as far as consensus is concerned. It's the same no matter which empirical field you take
@@scienceisdopeit is most definitely not the same as in STEM Science, science is based on hard facts and empirical evidence whereas Historiography needs Understanding of Mythology linguistics Genealogy Anthropology which are subjective and non empirical sciences to form a Hypothesis that have a lot of grey area and nuance unlike Hard science which does not have nuance. They fundamentally are not the same fields
@abhinav Bro, do you know what empirical means?
@@scienceisdope social science theories can only be considered as conjecture in natural sciences. Hence facts ascertained from these theories can't hold same value.
I agree about consensus, it would hold same value in respective field that it is best knowledge we have. But we assign certain importance to consensus not just on principle, but from its utility. Basically science makes aeroplane fly.
I am post modernist-ish on social issues.
So delighted to see this video pop up in my feed! I've been waiting for Pranav to tackle this guy's claims. But, I couldn't help but chuckle before hitting play, realizing the irony of our shared name in this context. LOL.
Kudos for the fantastic breakdown, Pranav!
On the topic of Abhijit's ambiguity about God versus his confidence in enunciating very clear views about 'aliens' using the same rationale, I'd be inclined to cut him some slack in that regard. Having identified as an atheist for nearly two decades, I've come to recognize the delicate nature of challenging someone's core beliefs. Often, these beliefs form the bedrock of their identity. And sometimes, it's more compassionate to let people journey through their beliefs at their own pace rather than confront them.
Keep up the insightful work, Pranav, and cheers to more enlightening content!
Being hopeful is good, being hopeful of finding something supernatural or observing some sort of energy that can be beneficial for Earth is itself a big inspiration for any scientist, especially in the field of astrophysics.
finding something supernatural would be more terrifying then beneficial
Nonsense nothing comment. Support your statement with evidence.
Modi not only invented electricity but he also time traveled and made the pyramid.
Alert!!Andhbhakts on the way:-)
Look who is talking...
The moat non rationalistic witch hunter christian
@@jishamp7539 😅😅😅
I read an ancient book which taught how to make smartphones.
Sir. 🙏 Thank you for this video. This Chavda guy while not all bad is just getting ridiculous for the past one year or so. Thanks and please sir you have a Coffee at Starbucks 😝 but on it may i recommend Blue Tokai or Flying Squirrel. They are good if you do it french press.
Ironically 1/2 the taxes & profits of that Starbucks coffee will go to the coffers of a certain party, into the IT cell
& into Chavda.
itna paisa but he deserves it
Thank you!
"chavda" in malayalam means telling someone to die, in that case the name he has he really deserved because its like telling abhijith chavda as it translates to abhijith go die 🤣🤣
Adi sakke 😂
@@ModiKohl8-zx3mylmao😂
@@ModiKohl8-zx3mywhat is your language?
Abhijit - 0 ; Pravav - 1 😂
You commented before watching the video 😂😂😂
@@AkashPatel-cz3pq Gukan - 0 ; Akash -1 😂
Ban Gaya cool . Ab Nikal BC
Ok bro what did he say in this video that made him win lol 😂
@@aravindarao9523 it doesn't matter . These kids think this is cool 🙂
People who know science and history but not enough ...is exactly the target audience of this person
My question is that why do we need to have invented modern tech in ancient times, and have some grand ancient mysteries, in order for us to be proud of who we are? I am proud of the cave paintings and mud huts and sacred groves and classical dances and folk tales, because they showcase the vibrant culture and social richness of our past. Why you need to chase these grand claims and feel some weird sense of superiority to feel connected to our roots?
Respect.
Also grand architecture , detailed sculptures and urban planning.
Society doesn't progress from cave paintings and folk tales.
@@Ameyiscool definitely doesn't progress from a widespread culture of patriarchy, racism, casteism, homophobia, bullying, paan-spitting, littering, religious fanaticism, and personality cults either.
@@spuriusscapula4829 Those are parts of every societies in the world 😊
Thanks
Abhijeet chavada should see one of Neil De Greys Tysons podcast.Most of people will love it.
You think Neil de grasse Tyson is the epitome of Scientific knowledge? How daft are you?
why ,your father is englishmen? why you not interested in your own people's podcast?
@@GyanTvAmit 😂😂😂
@@GyanTvAmitNeil degrasse tyson is a black American…
I am a regular Abhijit Chavda viewer and an agnostic (not atheist). The thing you said about him being ‘neutral on aliens and hopeful about god’ felt a little incorrect because hope means the desire for a particular thing to happen. AC, me, you and everyone else of scientific temperament is almost certain of existence of extra terrestrial life (statistically speaking) and me being an agnostic, I take a neutral stance on the existence of god, a stance of uncertainty. From all of AC’s talks I’ve heard, he seems to be an agnostic too. When he says that he’s hopeful that there is a god, he means that he ‘wishes that there is a god’ (it’s his desire), because a universe with a god is a lot less intimidating that a universe without a god
Pranav probably sees a great opportunity at hitting AC to attract attention.... A writer of Alexander's time (I have to check the name) wrote about Amatrachus ---> which was Greek of the then king of gangetic plains (Magadha) named DhanaNanda the last Nanda ruler ... and said The forces of Alexander refused to move beyond Indus after the treaty with Puru.... learning about the 200000 foot soldiers and 20000 cavalry with 5000 elephants.... of The Nanda's... The court of Nanda's were having some of the finest sages who dealt with Sun Moon and Stars calculations...
But Pranav is so baised in his science love that he is blinded by that towards the complexity reality presents.... Possibilities are king and rationale is good until it engulfs the raw intelligence.
Anyone who listened to podcast will get that he is just wishing that there is a god. But looks like instead of listening to it people are taking everything at face value and commenting 'finally someone debunked AC' etc. From the day I was recommend this channel I knew there would be more political tribalism than scientific discussion in the comments.
@@khosrowanushirwan7591 right, I like Pranav and what he is doing, but he isn’t perfect (like every other human). But still he is way better than his viewers, most of his viewers condemn ‘scientific authority’ and then flock towards a scientific authority themselves, irony.
It is interesting that this "construction of Daniel Cells" doesn't talk about the experiences the rishi had in using it. Like when Leyden jar was invented, it was literally about getting shocks, and then about generating electricity. Heck electrolysis wasn't even invented before Leyden Jars.
The "atom" of Kanada is far from being an actual atom. firstly, there is no mention of size of this "atom" in the original vaisheshika sutra. because it a was mystical concept not physics
but later texts have given several inconsistent definitions of Paramāṇu:
in one definition, one paramāṇu is 1/30th of the size of the smallest speck of dust visible to naked eye. there are living beings smaller than that. there is 90 billion atoms in an E. coli bacterium
in another definition, a paramāṇu is 1/32768th size of an barley cone. barley cone is about the size of 1ml of water. there is a trillion atoms in one ml of water.
basically, none of these are even close to being the concept of atom we have today.
Most of the subscribers for these youtubers are andhbakths who are bjp voters. I think .
@Prodigious147 yep.. why these people wants to live in imagination...non existing things etc..i dont understand them.. why they are in mass numbers?is it our cultural problem or a biological inability?
bro what is Brahmanism
@Prodigious147Cleverly ignored Islamic history... What a malicious leftist u are Islamic bot
Most big problem I see are Andhnamazis
@Prodigious147 what is Brahmanism
You should have a debate with Chavda about this. I hope he will stay away from pseudoscientific claims so that his actual expertise, if any, will become more valuable.
Honestly debating is waste of time Both are content creators
@@krox477 But Abhijit would dominate the debate, he's really impressively well read, he can give you reasons for any claim you'd ask him, It's just these podcasters like Ranveer whom I'd want to stfu with the dumb questions
@Prodigious147explain me the difference between rational povs and scientific debates
@Prodigious147 oh ic got it
@Prodigious147 Abhijit Chavda. has just a `BSc in physics from the college, his father used to teach. He has no idea of science or history but has a big ego and inferiority complex being the child of a physics professor and could not make anything in life. If you read the papers published by him in journal, you will always see his father as co-author and most papers are just 2-3 pages of salami slicing.
You should make more videos , keep going buddy , all the best to you .
None of theirs 33 crore gods showed up during covid 19 & even the devotees were scared to visit temples 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂covid-19 exposed all types of gods n godmen 😂
@@maitrinop : 33 crore gods/goddesses ….😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@maitrinop : all ur religious texts are fake just as your caste loving gods
Naah thats not 33 crores
Its 33 supreme Gods
Yeah it still sits perfectly with your statement
THere is no Dark side of the moon, there is only Far side and a near Side.
3:40 This is an outright appeal to authority fallacy. Hiis criterion to call a theory proposed by someone wrong is that it is not accepted by majority of scholars of the field, and not pointing out the particular flaws in the aspects of the theory. Lol, that shows what kind of "rationalism" he has. Why don't you go ahead and refute Abhijeet's Out of India Theory by giving arguments rather than making an appeal to the authority of consensus of most historians?
Simply calling anybody's theories "conspiracy theories" is not a refutation, Abhijeet provides rational arguments to propose his theory and refute Aryan Invasion Theory rather than simply calling it a conspiracy theory.
goes to show that even though you do not have evidence or any sort of research you can say something that the masses would like to hear and believe to a point that they would literally try to deflect any debunking against it
'Science is dope' is indeed dope. Fair assessment.
You are using arguments from authority to claim his positions on history are false instead of debating the arguments he presented, by saying it’s not accepted by experts.
In fields like history, there are clear political agendas, we know a lot of artifacts are not available or researched and just because academics tell you something, doesn’t mean it’s true. The consensus of many things has been wrong historically over and over again.
now i understand how these Sanskrit books are made I'm so dumb that i forgot we live in 2023 where you can translate English to Sanskrit on your fingertip
Your videos are not just informative but also a big stress buster for me. Proud of you ❤
If you can't prove anything is false It doesn't mean it is true.
Then what it is??
I'm a brahmin and a staunch believer of god. Your channel helps me draw a line between faith and blind faith. Love your content 🙏🙏
You could have said you are a Hindu and a staunch believer in god. But I see that proclaiming yourself to be a high cast elitist was important here 😅
@@akshayde dude.... Ssly😑😑
@@VaibhavKarthik why would you be "staunch" in your beliefs in god? 2ndly if pranav can change your mind between faith and blind faith then you are probably not "staunch". Look up what "staunch" means.
Also yeah, I don't know how and why your caste was relevant to your original comment but it seems like a performance to include it. Byeeeeee!
@@akshayde first of all there's a difference between "helped me change my mind" And "draw a line". Secondly brahmins have comparatively more blind beliefs than others.
@@akshayde you'll have much more problems if u take everything to ur heart😆😆 chill buddy
When AC talks about scientific topic he does a fairly good job of representing facts. But hishistory knowledge is mind boggling I once heard him say that Akbar is buried in Delhi when it's a known fact that He is Buried in Sikandarabad near Agra. He has no credibility when it comes to history and Beer Biceps has done a huge disservice by allowing him his platform multiple times.
Akbar's fake grave lies in Delhi it's a fact.
@Prodigious147 akbar has a fake grave incase you don't know
@@anchitbose4151 I'm talking about real one. Where his body was buried and exhumed by Jaat forces and burned. Mr. Chavda claimed that it was buried in Delhi where Sikhs exhumed it and threw the bones to the dogs. which is absolutely false.
Pranav, he doesn't have any expertise in History as well. History doesn't judge people's personalities in retrospect. He uses historical facts (sometimes misinformation) to forward his agenda. He doesn't have any background in History.
Well... I guess you haven't seen the whole video. He never commented on history in the entire video. He commented only on those parts which intersected with science. On the contrary, he commended Mr. Chadwa for his rational answers to the illogical questions asked by him.
@@PencilSketch_TariniPNayak I was talking about Chavada. Forgot to write 'he'.
@@harishnair4252 definately he has no background in history and same goes with ramchandra guha , romila thapar , irfan habib n all 😂 And RTIs are revealing propaganda after propaganda filled in the ncerts 😂 just like ncerts claimed many thing abt qutub minar 😂 and satvahanas ...actually textual history of india is never got the upgrade of current findings ...
@@Diasaster History doesn't care about names. All the claims should be corroborated with archaeological evidence and reliable historical documents. People don't believe historians but the evidence they provide. Historian's words are not proof just like exaggerated folk lores cannot be considered as historical evidence.
Sad part is people who are interviewing these kinda people are YOUNGSTERS AND EDUCATED themselves, still spreading this kinda stuff.
You don't have to debunk him. He started nicely but now he made a blunder about himself by making weird statements. He is not even a researcher neither knows how it works. He is just another TH-camr with topic "History". He mocks current research and then gives his theories which aren't true either.
Exactly.He has none of the credentials required to be a physicist or a historian.
@@subhadeepghosh3961he has a degree in physics and astronomy.
@@subhadeepghosh3961said by a keyboard warrior
@@alpha-vs1fx and that doesn't mean physicist or a historian. You have to produce research paper to have the tag. He has only done Masters not PhD. Neither he works for research.
@@sskamble6758 never said it means that lol. Just that it makes his word more legit.
After reading the Bhagwat Geeta
Oppenheimer invented the atom bomb
Nope
Gita is not a scientific book
It's a philosophical book
@@mr.gamerkabir8142 sarcasm
@@LIGHTYAGAMI-m2w nope
Have you even read gita?
@@mr.gamerkabir8142he was talking about his own comment
@@Sujo89 oh...
Maybe I am new to this "atheist" humour
I have nothing after watching that I am like it is okay until he is hopeful but problem if he teaches that hopeful as reality to other.
As long as he doesn't accept it as reality and adds as a check I am gonna agree with him 😊
Iam waiting for years someone to shut up and expose chawda . Thank god the day has come.❤
????c'mon man he's just talking about science what the fuck do you want from him just don't watch him go such Duggal rathis
It's shocking that this Chhevda guy speaks more about history and politics than science while he's supposed to have scientific study as his educational background.
Because he gets money from the bjp IT cell.
How can anyone be proud of their nationality, religion, caste or creed? None of these are the result of one's choice. All of us are accidents of history and are born without our consent. So what is there to be proud of? Yes of course you could proud of your own achievements in a particular field of your choice, because that's your work and you should be proud of that. Being proud of one's nationality is different from being a responsible citizen of their country (which includes not spitting on public places, not violating traffic rules, showing respect to fellow citizens irrespective of religion, colour, gender, caste and class and helping one another in need) which many don't want to be.
Because of conditioning since birth, these people are indoctrinated since birth using different binaries like religion, caste, nationality, language etc, these ignorant melieus then form the botnets for the psychopaths at the top, who use them to maintain hegemony and control over the system, this is the reason they promote culture, religion, irrationality, nationalism, language and all kinds of useless constructs, media tunes their biases and programs them to love or hate groups according to the whims of the apex apes!
He said Rishi Kanad came up with Theory. Isn't theory a hypothesis and legitimate approach even if the lack of technological advances don't allow to build experiments?
Hmm. It doesn't really make sense. For example I can claim that 100 or 1000s year later humanity would walk on another planet. I just Don't have enough technological material to actually achieve it.
Does this mean i invented inter-planetary travel?
@@bullymaguire5838 strange argument!
More recent example, Machine Learning methods of data science theoretically were developed in 1980s but could not be used until recently due to lack of computational power, does it mean machine learning theory was wrong?
Theory wud almost always precede practice....
@@pulkit8628 yes I also believe so but you're confusing vague mentioning with established theories.
For example we know a man making mechanical wings and flying towards the sun is pretty popular story but that doesn't mean the writer should be given credit for making aeroplanes or jetpack.
Hypothesis have been found about most things since ancient times but they didn't gave Amy exact formula, or evidence that's why they're not credited.
I'm pretty sure millions of people thought about gravity before newton but none of them gave rules, formula etc to actually prove it.
@@bullymaguire5838 my question how do you know the theory by Rishi Kanad is vague?
Or it's just a story?
The depth of philosophical thought is most of our ancient philosophies is mind boggling...
Just see Yog school of philosophical thought...
I see new pranav video, I hit like, I get more enlightened.
Simple life.
Hi pranav, just wanted to let you know that in ajeet Bharti's video he didn't talk about hope like at 19:05, but said there definitely is cause there's dark energy and dark matter... argument from ignorance from his part here I'm not sure why he's being meek..
I hope you go to a podcast and say everything 100% logical and correct.
Eveyone has their own interests on different conspiracies and their ideas and beliefs on a subject matter and there is a 100% chance that half of the things he talked was false but i don't think someone sitting in a room should suggest about what the other person said is wrong or right.
What's the problem in analyzing someone's opinion and criticizing the wrong things to spread awareness among people?
@@rohittekchandani5720 There's nothing wrong with that and if he had analyzed Abhijit chavda video from his channel then i would be fine but not in podcast. people say number of things and not everything is correct. if we go by your logic he shoul analyze every podcast in the world cause not a single podcast may be 100% right
Hold up!! since when did those creators start a podcast ??
Im viewer of AC, but I really appreciate Pranav's analysis of his podcast.
There should be logical criticism.
16:06 I will try to find the source of this verse. Whether it is new or was already known for centuries.
I would love for this man invite him in a podcast and actually interview him. Abhijit is a well of knowledge and i would love for this guy to interview him and actually get his biases removed.
@@adityathakur9132 then you will see him changing tune
so a genuine question do u firmly believe history is not distorted and science academics have no propaganda?