@@bosertheropode5443 Registered nurse, 20+ years acute and critical care experience, including ER, Level I Trauma, and Level II NICU. What's your area of medical specialty, sweetie? Edit: Any degree from Trump U doesn't count.
@@kt550 Yes let's not compare it economic wise because it doesn't affect you financially. Its more fun to be in a place where you can harass and yell to women about it.
Well according to the Biden approved Democrat justice, there is no definition for a woman. I think you are bigotted, doesn't the left say men can indeed give birth? The correct term is 'birthing-people'.
The illegality of killing another human being is an American moral. It’s not about religion. It’s about protecting the natural rights that a human has. A baby in the womb is a human. It has unique dna and it’s actually an innocent life believe it or not. But I’m glad your quick to blame the religious folks for being on the wrong side 😬
And irresponsible women who don't practice birth control. We have free health clinics that offer free exams and free birth control. These clinics were created to help reduce unwanted pregnancies and women are still getting pregnant ??
Forced to give birth or Forced to be responsible and be more careful about thier choices. Protecting human life and having kids is a blessing not a curse.
I'm not sure why only your life is valuable. Every human deserves to be here just like you and if you don't protect that process before birth you wouldn't be here none of us would be here
If you know for a fact according to your doctor that the baby you're carrying has medical issues that will impact the baby future's, deciding what best to do that's will help you and the baby is a must. What's
Yk Iceland aborts most of the babies who have Down’s syndrome. Last I checked a disease doesn’t make you less human. So how about you respect the life and innocence of the baby instead of letting another human have the “right” to kill another human.
So if the same baby they wanted to Kill before birth has been born into the word and has become a 2 year old is it now ok for the mother to still abort the child’s life and why not ?
These videos are so important to illustrate the problems we face, but they don't tell us what we can do to change things. We need a call to action, something that those who are watching can do to make a difference. Yes, those who care a lot about these issues will look into ways to protest and try to change the outcome, but the purpose of these videos is to reach out to people who don't already understand how much this will affect women and people with uteruses. The people this video is targeted at may not care enough to go research ways they can make a difference, but they might take a small action if Now This gave them a call to action or an opportunity where they could do something concrete that would make a difference. @NowThis, you are missing out on such a big opportunity by not providing viewers with a call to action! (Edited for grammar)
So here’s the thing. A pregnant mother has 10 fingers, 10 toes, 1 heart and 1 brain. The baby inside of her is not a body part. It is a human. It has unique dna made of partly by the mother. Now just because you are related to a human does not give you the right to kill that human. You can’t make a life and the kill that life. That’s not how the world works. Instead of respecting the right to kill an unborn baby how about we respect the natural rights that baby has (life liberty property… the whole point of America etc.) now that unborn baby might not have any property but you get my point
@@DominiNostriJesuChristi dude, everybody has the right of bodily autonomy over their own body. You dont actually care about life, if you did then you would make adoption shelters more of a vialable option by fixing and removing the corruption that runs rampart in them, all you care about is extorting power over women so that she isnt allowed to say no to you. Women are equal and deserve equal rights no matter what your backwater religion says about them, they are more then just breeding slaves that only exist for your pleasure. No means no
@@DominiNostriJesuChristi everybody has the right of bodily autonomy over their own body and in no way should one remove another person right over their body.
@@DominiNostriJesuChristi tell me exactly how you're not part of my body when you're inside my body feeding of the food i eat and draining my blood to grow?
Get back to me once the father will have the right to say that he doesn't want a child and mother is forced to support him alone. You want the equal rights, right?
@Robert Martin You want no responsibility? We are talking about human life. I'm absolutely sure you are thankful your life was preserved in the womb. Under the guise of 'bodily autonomy,' it's far too easy to discuss ending a life that isn't yours.
@Robert Martin You really think it is acceptable to end an infant's life before it can properly begin? Do you really want 'bodily autonomy'? By supporting the surrender of a life? Does the life of the baby not count? Is their bodily autonomy not worth anything to you? I am certain you are grateful someone considered your life of value and allowed for you to be born. It is very interesting the term 'woman' suddenly has gained some relevance all of a sudden amongst the left. I thought the left preferred 'birthing people'? Didn't the Democrat approved next justice say there was no definition for a woman?
@@monarchist1838 let me ask you this: Do you believe that the law should compel you to give me your kidney if I'll die without it? Surely my right to life is greater than your right to an organ that you don't need in order to survive? If you say no to that, then let's lower the ask: you give me your kidney for nine months. That should let me survive long enough to find a permanent donor, but if not then you still get your kidney back at that point even if it means I die. (And yes, double transplantation of kidneys is a thing that happens in the real world.) You're demanding that women surrender, not just their kidney for 9 months, but *all* of their organs for 9 months.
I think they forgot to ask the grown child that was born in poverty whether or not they wished they were killed. Every baby deserves to live, the idea that selfish financial reasons is a good reason to KILL a baby is absurd
@@franklaferriere5754 first of all that’s a global statistic. Secondly, no I’m not ok with that. However, your solution to stop World hunger is to kill them before they are born? You and this video are saying it would have been better if the starving children’s mom had killed them.
Jeshua, let me ask you this: Do you believe that the law should compel you to give me your kidney if I'll die without it? Surely my right to life is greater than your right to an organ that you don't need in order to survive? If you say no to that, then let's lower the ask: you give me your kidney for nine months. That should let me survive long enough to find a permanent donor, but if not then you still get your kidney back at that point even if it means I die. (And yes, double transplantation of kidneys is a thing that happens in the real world.) My answer to both of those questions is "No, that's insane. My right to life does not override your right to control your body and what is done to it." I suspect you agree with that and would feel no obligation to give me your kidney...except you're also saying that a fetus's right to life overrides the woman's right to control her body and what is done with it. You're asking her to donate, not just a kidney for 9 months, but *all* of her organs for 9 months. Pregnancy is a life-altering thing. It permanently changes a woman's body. Among other things, it can cause tearing that leads to permanent incontinence and, oh yes, maternal mortality in the USA is roughly 1 in 5000. It also drastically reduces or eliminates a woman's ability to work or pursue her normal activities. Would you be so quick to support forced birth if you were required to go through the same thing that your pregnant girlfriend/wife was? Suppose it was mandated that you had to wear weights strapped to your belly 24/7 for the duration of her pregnancy, you had to have water injected into your ankles every day, you had to take nausea-inducing pills for months, and if she died in birth then you would be immediately executed. If you aren't willing to undergo those things, why are you requiring that a woman should?
@jeshuadedic, how many children have you fostered? How many have you adopted? How many homeless women with children have you welcomed to your home and help get a job? How many hours do you spend each week volunteering at a women's shelter?
I think it’s so insane that we’re still fighting for basic rights like this 🙄
Yeah, the basic right to kill your offspring
@Snyder The Star Wars Fan Oh wow, since when do Star Wars incels get to decide on my healthcare rights?
@Snyder The Star Wars Fan That seems on brand for you, brain trust.
@@plaidpanda And I suppose you have a degree in medicine?
@@bosertheropode5443 Registered nurse, 20+ years acute and critical care experience, including ER, Level I Trauma, and Level II NICU. What's your area of medical specialty, sweetie? Edit: Any degree from Trump U doesn't count.
Yeah, let's force women to give birth to unwanted babies, what could possibly go wrong?
Let's add more kids to the foster system. 400,000 is not enough.
Yes let’s compare abortions to economics!
@@kt550 Yes let's not compare it economic wise because it doesn't affect you financially. Its more fun to be in a place where you can harass and yell to women about it.
@@rene2326 what’s more dystopian than the government insisting we kill babies to improve overall economics of the country?
@@rene2326 Right. Killing a million children a year is ever so much better.
How about when men can get pregnant and give birth, then they can have a say in what a woman does with her body?
How about we don’t kill babies in the womb for the sake of the “economy”
Well according to the Biden approved Democrat justice, there is no definition for a woman. I think you are bigotted, doesn't the left say men can indeed give birth? The correct term is 'birthing-people'.
how about the person decides what to do with her body
But I thought it took 2 people to make the baby tho… 😳
How about we don’t kill babies 🤷
Its crazy how backwards the religious right is in the US.
not everyone is religious in the US why should they have to follow religious laws🤣
The illegality of killing another human being is an American moral. It’s not about religion. It’s about protecting the natural rights that a human has. A baby in the womb is a human. It has unique dna and it’s actually an innocent life believe it or not. But I’m glad your quick to blame the religious folks for being on the wrong side 😬
Me, wanting to know more:
The texas tourism ad on the video: *allow me to introduce myself*
There's a lot of irresponsible men out there !
And irresponsible women who don't practice birth control. We have free health clinics that offer free exams and free birth control.
These clinics were created to help reduce unwanted pregnancies and women are still getting pregnant ??
making it more likely for those women to put the infants up for adoption thus increasing the domestic supply of infants.
But if they just “repent” and “give their lives to gawd” he’ll bless them. That’s how humans and the world works. /s
not everyone is religious🤨
TIM-US Army Veteran
We as a people are illuminating ourselves!!
Forced to give birth or Forced to be responsible and be more careful about thier choices. Protecting human life and having kids is a blessing not a curse.
I'm not sure why only your life is valuable. Every human deserves to be here just like you and if you don't protect that process before birth you wouldn't be here none of us would be here
Absolutely 👍
How about we tackle inflation first before we are all broke?
If you know for a fact according to your doctor that the baby you're carrying has medical issues that will impact the baby future's, deciding what best to do that's will help you and the baby is a must. What's
Yk Iceland aborts most of the babies who have Down’s syndrome. Last I checked a disease doesn’t make you less human. So how about you respect the life and innocence of the baby instead of letting another human have the “right” to kill another human.
TIM-US Army Veteran
But yet?
There's people out there that can't have children!!
But... want them.
So if the same baby they wanted to Kill before birth has been born into the word and has become a 2 year old is it now ok for the mother to still abort the child’s life and why not ?
These videos are so important to illustrate the problems we face, but they don't tell us what we can do to change things. We need a call to action, something that those who are watching can do to make a difference. Yes, those who care a lot about these issues will look into ways to protest and try to change the outcome, but the purpose of these videos is to reach out to people who don't already understand how much this will affect women and people with uteruses. The people this video is targeted at may not care enough to go research ways they can make a difference, but they might take a small action if Now This gave them a call to action or an opportunity where they could do something concrete that would make a difference. @NowThis, you are missing out on such a big opportunity by not providing viewers with a call to action!
(Edited for grammar)
Her body, her choice.
My wallet, my choice.
👍
So here’s the thing. A pregnant mother has 10 fingers, 10 toes, 1 heart and 1 brain. The baby inside of her is not a body part. It is a human. It has unique dna made of partly by the mother. Now just because you are related to a human does not give you the right to kill that human. You can’t make a life and the kill that life. That’s not how the world works. Instead of respecting the right to kill an unborn baby how about we respect the natural rights that baby has (life liberty property… the whole point of America etc.) now that unborn baby might not have any property but you get my point
@@DominiNostriJesuChristi dude, everybody has the right of bodily autonomy over their own body.
You dont actually care about life, if you did then you would make adoption shelters more of a vialable option by fixing and removing the corruption that runs rampart in them, all you care about is extorting power over women so that she isnt allowed to say no to you.
Women are equal and deserve equal rights no matter what your backwater religion says about them, they are more then just breeding slaves that only exist for your pleasure.
No means no
@@DominiNostriJesuChristi everybody has the right of bodily autonomy over their own body and in no way should one remove another person right over their body.
@@DominiNostriJesuChristi tell me exactly how you're not part of my body when you're inside my body feeding of the food i eat and draining my blood to grow?
Get back to me once the father will have the right to say that he doesn't want a child and mother is forced to support him alone. You want the equal rights, right?
Murdering an innocent child doesn't justify anything.
@Robert Martin You want no responsibility? We are talking about human life. I'm absolutely sure you are thankful your life was preserved in the womb. Under the guise of 'bodily autonomy,' it's far too easy to discuss ending a life that isn't yours.
@Robert Martin You really think it is acceptable to end an infant's life before it can properly begin? Do you really want 'bodily autonomy'? By supporting the surrender of a life? Does the life of the baby not count? Is their bodily autonomy not worth anything to you? I am certain you are grateful someone considered your life of value and allowed for you to be born.
It is very interesting the term 'woman' suddenly has gained some relevance all of a sudden amongst the left. I thought the left preferred 'birthing people'? Didn't the Democrat approved next justice say there was no definition for a woman?
@@monarchist1838 let me ask you this: Do you believe that the law should compel you to give me your kidney if I'll die without it? Surely my right to life is greater than your right to an organ that you don't need in order to survive? If you say no to that, then let's lower the ask: you give me your kidney for nine months. That should let me survive long enough to find a permanent donor, but if not then you still get your kidney back at that point even if it means I die. (And yes, double transplantation of kidneys is a thing that happens in the real world.)
You're demanding that women surrender, not just their kidney for 9 months, but *all* of their organs for 9 months.
@@monarchist1838 yes do you want baby born to a om that doesn't want it?
I think they forgot to ask the grown child that was born in poverty whether or not they wished they were killed. Every baby deserves to live, the idea that selfish financial reasons is a good reason to KILL a baby is absurd
Oh so you're ok with 3.1 million children starving to death each year. And the millions of thrown away kids existing in homelessness on the streets.
@@franklaferriere5754 first of all that’s a global statistic. Secondly, no I’m not ok with that. However, your solution to stop World hunger is to kill them before they are born? You and this video are saying it would have been better if the starving children’s mom had killed them.
Jeshua, let me ask you this: Do you believe that the law should compel you to give me your kidney if I'll die without it? Surely my right to life is greater than your right to an organ that you don't need in order to survive? If you say no to that, then let's lower the ask: you give me your kidney for nine months. That should let me survive long enough to find a permanent donor, but if not then you still get your kidney back at that point even if it means I die. (And yes, double transplantation of kidneys is a thing that happens in the real world.)
My answer to both of those questions is "No, that's insane. My right to life does not override your right to control your body and what is done to it." I suspect you agree with that and would feel no obligation to give me your kidney...except you're also saying that a fetus's right to life overrides the woman's right to control her body and what is done with it. You're asking her to donate, not just a kidney for 9 months, but *all* of her organs for 9 months.
Pregnancy is a life-altering thing. It permanently changes a woman's body. Among other things, it can cause tearing that leads to permanent incontinence and, oh yes, maternal mortality in the USA is roughly 1 in 5000. It also drastically reduces or eliminates a woman's ability to work or pursue her normal activities. Would you be so quick to support forced birth if you were required to go through the same thing that your pregnant girlfriend/wife was? Suppose it was mandated that you had to wear weights strapped to your belly 24/7 for the duration of her pregnancy, you had to have water injected into your ankles every day, you had to take nausea-inducing pills for months, and if she died in birth then you would be immediately executed. If you aren't willing to undergo those things, why are you requiring that a woman should?
Can you even give birth?
*Yes* or *No*
@jeshuadedic, how many children have you fostered? How many have you adopted? How many homeless women with children have you welcomed to your home and help get a job? How many hours do you spend each week volunteering at a women's shelter?