@@TechWithSally4D i answered you , as your Qur'an says "go to the people of the book", well im telling you. Read Isaiah 53 and you will find the answer to your question
"But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same veil untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which veil is done away in Christ. But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the veil is upon their heart." 2 Corinthians 3:14-15 KJV Thank you Lord Jesus for Dr Brown. Bless his ministry
I didn't listen to this video. I only saw the title, and then I seen your comment because it was on top. And I don't know or care about what he had to say. But I know this. If he was saying that Jesus is the Angel of Jehovah/the LORD, then he's absolutely right about that. And here's where you can find that. Zechariah 12:8 it says "In that day the one who is feeble among them will be like David and the house of David will be like God, like the Angel of Jehovah/the LORD that goes before them. So this is a two part verse. Answer the first part of the verse and it gives you the answer to the second part. And the reason it's a two part verse is because of the comma that splits it in the middle. So let's look at what the first part says. The house of David will be "like" God. Who in the lineage of David is most like God from David all the way down to Jesus??? The answer is Jesus. Jesus is most like God. And this answer gives you the answer to the second part of the verse which says "will be like God, like the Angel of Jehovah/the LORD that goes before them. That comma is a continuation of the sentence and it means that whatever the answer is for the first part is the answer to the second and here's where you can find where the Angel goes before them. Exodus 23:20, 21(it's actually in Exodus 3 times but this one is my favorite, you can find the others at 14:19 and 32:34) so here's what 23:20,21 says "I am sending an angel ahead of you to guard you on your way into the place I have prepared for you, Pay attention to him and obey his voice, do not rebel against him for he will not pardon your transgressions because my name is in him. So he said my name is in him. Do you know what Jesus' name means?? It means Jehovah is salvation. His name is in him. Huh!! And what Angel has the Power to not pardon transgressions?? Jesus has that power for sure. Here's what's up. Jesus is the Angel that spoke to Moses in the burning bush and he is the Angel that wrestled with Jacob in Genesis and he is the Angel that spoke to Balaam and appeared to Balaam's donkey, and he's the Angel that spoke to Manoah in Judges. This is why Jesus is called the WORD of God because he speaks for God. John 5:37 says, "You have neither seen his form, nor heard his voice at any time." So if no one has heard God's voice then that means that it's Jesus speaking for Jehovah his father. Don't be fooled by your religion that says differently. Jesus is the greatest thing that God ever Created
“At that time Jesus said, “I praise You, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that You have hidden these things from the wise and intelligent, and have revealed them to infants.” Matthew 11:25 NASB
Love how he debunks Sr. Singer. Haha. Love these videos. Dr. Brown gets Down. 😂 🕊️🙏🏼👍🏼 good stuff.. Keep it going Sr.Brown... NO PAIN NO GLORY....🕊️👍🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🥊🥊🥊
@@TechWithSally4D why are you copy pasting the same comment everywhere? Are you actually with an honest heart searching for an answer or are you just here to dump your supposed clever question thinking you got us and then ignore all the responses?
For unto us a Child is born, Unto us a Son is given; And the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, *Mighty God, EVERLASTING* Father, Prince of Peace. - Isaiah 9:6. Praise the Lord for He is worthy to be praised as the Father is praised
Of the greatness of his government and peace there will be no end. He will reign on David’s throne and over his kingdom, establishing and upholding it with justice and righteousness from that time on and forever. The zeal of the Lord Almighty will accomplish this. You left this portion out. This has not occurred, and thus, they don't believe the Jesus is the Messiah.
Thank you Brother Michael, I decided to dig through Rabbi Singer content over the last week and have been feeling incredibly discouraged, even though I know what I believe to be true. I don’t feel like it is a coincidence that both your video, and the newest Ehrman debate, occurred over these last few days in my time and need. Again, thank you again, it is great to know you
@@Akhil_Chilukapati Bart Ehrman has many interesting bits of info but maybe only proves what JESUS warned about with added traditions and regulations and corruptions of organized religion?
Praise the Lord! Michael Brown destroys this Rabbis arguments against Jesus Christ. This is a major problem with these Rabbis. They are either spiritually blind or they are not being totally honest with scripture. It is actually both.
@@TechWithSally4D Obviously you have not read the Bible. Jesus said He was laying His life down voluntarily. He had to die for mankind to be saved from their sins. Then He rose from the dead demonstrating He is the eternal Son of God.
@@redmegas6255 Actually, he is worse than a Pharisee cuz he has been influenced by the Masoretes (6th-9th centuries A.D.) and by medieval men who lived under Islamic rule and were influenced by Islam (nonsense such as Rebekah being three or ten or fourteen when Prophet Isaac married her). Also, there is no *complete* manuscript of the Talmud from before the 14th century A.D.; so, they there is no proof for what they have attributed to people who lived in 200 A.D. and to people who lived in 500 A.D.
2:56 tovia's argument is borderline dishonest. The term "angel" both in Hebrew and Greek simply means messenger. it's a functional term which simply denotes function or role. based on the surrounding context, it can refer to humans and created spirits. (humans:- Gen 32:3 James 2:25 spirit creatures Gen 28:12 Mathew 4:6 Deity Gen 31:10-13) in Heb 1, the entire point of the author is to show how The Son is greater than the angels. the ones being called "angels" are spirit creatures. it explicitly says that in Heb 1:14 " Are not all angels *ministering spirits* sent to serve those who will inherit salvation? " Heb 1:14 the ones being called angels in the context are created ministering spirits. we don't claim The Angel of The Lord is a ministering spirit, but The Lord. plus, by quoting Psal 104:4, the author identifies the angels spoken of in the chapter as creatures who were made by God, to be like flames of fire. which means the ones who are being called angels in the context are created spirit beings. " In speaking of the angels he says, “He makes his angels spirits, and his servants *flames of fire* " Heb 1:7 Singer is outright lying about the christian position. The Son is greater than spirit creatures. because he is deity as to his nature. the reason he was called "Angel" in the old testament is because he was the messenger of The Father Jesus is the truth!
I want to give Singer the benefit of the doubt. Were he any less knowledgeable, he might deserve it. But he knows all too what he's saying are not true.
@@TechWithSally4D it was the only way he could face death, when he was put to death he trapped satan, in his body. By doing this Yah, was able to judge and condemn the devil. putting death to death in Yeshua and raise him up out of it; Seating him @ the right hand of the most high Yah does not execute satan , @ this point, but casts him out of the body of Yeshua. If Yah executed him, we all would of been destroyed, because we all were in Adam. Now @ this time we are given the opportunity to, accept Yeshua and escape death, by accepting Yeshua. who Yah raised from the dead, restoring us in Yeshua, to right standing with Yah. By putting us to death in messiah, Yah separates are Yah, breathed soul, from the sinful nature of the flesh, putting it to death in Yeshua and raises us up in him pure and clean. *Thats why they were allowed to murder him.* The very word redemption indicates that there is a separation with man, from yah. Why would we need to be bought back if we never were sold? *My Righteous Servant The Branch* Isaiah 53 : 9--; And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth. 10Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand. 11He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities. 12Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors..
Evangelicals can "shut up" about politics when the left wing atheists do. Our when the God-hating Marxists do. Our when any number of other religious-at-the-heart groups do. Fortunately, at least for now, in this country you don't get to shut someone up just because you don't like what they're saying. Or because you're occasionally convicted of sin in your life.
Actually our brothers over at one for Israel is very well versed in the Hebrew scriptures, and they debate Orthodox Rabbis all the time, and they are very successful in debating them.
Sounds like the two powers in heaven idea that Dr. Michael Heiser speaks about. Rabbinic tradition threw this idea out as a heresy sometime after the Crucifixion and Ascension.
Hello Dr Brown. I've always loved the verse in Proverbs where it is said:Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? who hath gathered the wind in his fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? what is his name, and what is his son's name, if thou canst tell? Surely this is the father and the son. what would Rabbi Singer have to say concerning this scripture? Ty and God bless!
Thank you Dr. Brown we really have no way to refute the Hebrew scriptures arguments if the Hebrew speaking Rabbi says it's mistranslated . But we trust you, blessings.
No, there’s several angles you can proof your faith and use to corner them in for their misdoings. The age of the LLX, as translation from a Hebrew text that’s older than the masoretic text they use,reads differently from the masoretic text that they use to formulate their arguments against Christ. There are a hand full of masoretic text that support the English translations in support of Yeshua being moshieachk. The Dead Sea scrolls is another witness against them.
I met Rabbi Tovia Singer in Jerusalem in November 2019 when I testified to him about what Yeshua has done in my life, that I was completely changed by him from Jew-hater to someone who loves the Jews Tovia Singer could not say more about it. In the end, he just wanted to discuss.
Loved this video. May Our Lord Christ Jesus open the hearts of all Jewish people and everyone who don't know Him yet. That they all may come to love Him and know Him in Spirit and in Truth. Amen
Amazing dr Brown!!!!! GOD bless you. Classic example of the blindness over God's beloved Israel. For us Christians let the bible speak dont put false doctrines us many do to say what they want to hear.... romans 9 as an example some Christians take compleatly out of contest ..... God is good and Israel eyes will be open .....
The Contemporary Torah, Jewish Publication Society, 2006 Genesis 48:16 הַמַּלְאָךְ֩ הַגֹּאֵ֨ל אֹתִ֜י מִכׇּל־רָ֗ע יְבָרֵךְ֮ אֶת־הַנְּעָרִים֒ וְיִקָּרֵ֤א בָהֶם֙ שְׁמִ֔י וְשֵׁ֥ם אֲבֹתַ֖י אַבְרָהָ֣ם וְיִצְחָ֑ק וְיִדְגּ֥וּ לָרֹ֖ב בְּקֶ֥רֶב הָאָֽרֶץ׃ The Messenger who has redeemed me from all harm- Bless the lads. In them may my name be recalled, And the names of my fathers Abraham and Isaac, And may they be teeming multitudes upon the earth.”
This came to me while watching this episode: First, the Levitical priesthood was established, then, hundreds of years later, the kings were anointed. Well, first Jesus came as a priest to atone for our sins, then He comes as the Ruling King over all the world!
There is a fundemental difference between Michael Brown and Rabbi Zinger. The later is using tactics and rethorics while Brown is keen on Truth. This is why every argument by Zinger is so easily demolished using scripture
I find these vary occurrences in the Old Testament very compelling. There are others you did not address that I have read where the angel of the Lord speaks as the Lord himself. That is hard to reconcile as a Jew I would imagine. It synchronized very well with Gods revealed tripartite nature in the New Testament especially since the Spirit is revealed in Genesis as hovering over the waters.
In John 17, Jesus tells you where he was and who he was with before the world was. HE was known as the Angel of the Lord before we knew Him as Jesus/Yeshua. King James Version in Philippians 2:6-8 says this about Jesus: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men; And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of a ...
Imam Tovia Singer with his dishonest games once again, dude really tried to argue that capitalization was a scam LOOL. Great work exposing him once again Dr.Brown
Mathew 11:25 At that time Joshua answering said, 'I do confess to Thee, Father, Lord of the heavens and of the earth, that thou didst hide these things from wise and understanding ones, and didst reveal them to babes.
Their is an issue of Humbleness with Rabbi, unless they humble themselves and know the purpose of the lord even choosing a nation Israel to fullfull his purpose of sending the messiah Yeshua to them and for the whole world...unless they understand this they wont understand the rest
Love Dr Browns videos but I'm so confused at the Joshua son of Jehozadak references.. Isn't he a totally different guy to Jesus? Rarely have I heard this as prophecy or anything
10 “Shout and be glad, Daughter Zion. For I am coming, and I will live among you,” declares the Lord. 11 “Many nations will be joined with the Lord in that day and will become my people. I will live among you and you will know that the Lord Almighty has sent me to you. 12 The Lord will inherit Judah as his portion in the holy land and will again choose Jerusalem. 13 Be still before the Lord, all mankind, because he has roused himself from his holy dwelling.” Zech 2 is pretty explicit
I don't know what is wrong with Imam Tovia, but he is so full of hate, contempt towards Christianity, yet he is so welcoming and shows profound love, respect to muslims and towards Islam, when he fully knows the quran call the Jewish people as decedents of Apes and pigs.
Verses like these are not exactly Jewish friendly. "Beware of the dogs, beware of the evil workers, beware of the false circumcision.... Philippians 3:2
@@waitstill7091 Wow, way to rip a verse out of its context. Are you that desperate to find verses with antisemitism that you have to lie. Paul ( the author) is writing concerning those who were *forcing* gentile Christians to be circumcised and were boasting about their righteousness based off their circumcised flesh. The insult is not towards all Jews/circumcised individuals. Paul himself is a circumcised Jew as he elaborates in verses 4-8 and he circumcised Timothy, his problem is only with those who force it on gentiles (like in Galatians 5) or those boasting about their flesh. Again by your logic, Paul a circumcised man would be calling himself a dog and evil doer.
@@sjappiyah4071 Paul discarded his Jewish ways and called it garbage. "For his sake I have discarded everything else, counting it all as garbage, so that I could gain Christ." Philippians 3:8
The Trinity is clearly taught in the Tanakh. Malak Yahveh is the pre-incarnate Word of God. Malak means messenger, not angel. It can refer to angelic servants of God, but also to human messengers and of course THE messenger of Yahveh.
It is Moses's mistake , he thought it was the angel of the Lord who had appeared to him but God says no I'm not an angel " I'm who I'm " I'm God of Ibrahim , Isaac and Jacob .
@@samsont7786 " cherubim means the one burning fire", theologically angels are made up by fire , in common sense Moses seeing a burning bush with fire would have sought it was an angel , but he was mistaken because even fire signifies the divine presence , " the seven candlesticks of burning fire known as manorah " in the temple signified the spirit of the Lord: , in holy Bible no any angel has ever claimed being divine with the exception of Satan " Lucifer "
the manorah represented the tree of life , what did Moses actually see , a burning bush ???, I think no but " tree of life " , the burning manorah signified , the spirit of life , the spirit of wisdom , of understanding , of fortitude , knowledge , counsel ,piety and fear of the Lord, " the seven spirits of the Lord.,this means Moses was also filled with the holy Spirit at the incident , actually it was Moses's Pentecost
What's also interesting is how the Angel of the Lord speaks as Yahweh himself, yet also speaks to Yahweh in Heaven. Just as Jesus. Zechariah 1:12 New International Version 12 Then the angel of the Lord said, “Lord Almighty, how long will you withhold mercy from Jerusalem and from the towns of Judah, which you have been angry with these seventy years?”
God bless you, Dr Brown. I’m right there with you, shoulder to shoulder as a brother in Christ. I guess what gets confusing is angels are an actual category of being, actually below humans on the pecking order, if you want to put it crudely. So when Scripture states that God appears as an angel, I think that phraseology is unfortunate (not to be critical of the writer) because it can make a reader think that God is an angel. He’s no such thing. He’s God. But I’m not going to argue with the writer because I have no such right. Obviously God can do as He pleases. I guess in the end the message can be that it’s trying to convey that Jesus (Christophany) is the Angel. I need to think and study more on this. But thank you so much for what you do. God bless you
Tovia's insufferable. But as a spiritual descendant of not the Sadduccees but the Pharisees, he can't help but be that way-- I can almost hear Tovia's voice in the teachers of the law when they tried to trick Jesus with their questions... (BUT I PRAY FOR TOVIA regularly-- that God will show him Messiah-- That Jesus, Yeshua, will meet him on his road to Damascus... )!
I honestly try not to refer to Rabbi Tovia as a joke but he makes it exceptionally difficult, and that's without scholars like yourself responding to him. What he says is almost like comedy sometimes.
I've listened to Rabbi Singer many times. Most often Singer misquotes, distorts or outright lies about the New Testament or/and our beliefs. He reminds me of the over the top angry Pharisees attacking and deflecting in the NT.
The NET Bible comments on Genesis 16:7: “Some identify the angel of the Lord as the preincarnate Christ… However, it is more likely that the angel merely represents the Lord; he can speak for the Lord because he is sent with the Lord’s full authority. In some cases the angel is clearly distinct from the Lord (see Judg. 6:11-23). It is not certain if the same angel is always in view. Though the proper name following the noun ‘angel’ makes the construction definite [grammatically], this may simply indicate that a definite angel sent from the Lord is referred to in any given context. It need not be the same angel on every occasion. Note the analogous expression ‘the servant of the LORD’ which refers to various individuals in the OT.” Similarly, in Deuteronomy 15:17 God commands masters to take an awl and put it through the ear of a servant. The Hebrew here literally says “the awl,” but are we to suppose there was one specific awl that was kept since the time of Moses and used all the time? Of course not. Also, the Bible speaks of plural “angels of God” (Gen. 28:12; 32:1); these are clearly the same as angels of the LORD (see Ps. 103:20).
Totally agree that the majority of things the Jews observe and do are not found in scripture but are Rabbinic teaching made up by them as their oral law not God's Law as Jesus Himself said "You do make void the commandment of God by your traditions" "You put burdens on others which you yourselves do-not do" We need to stick to Scripture.
Please more of this bible studies and LESS POLITICS. We dont care so much for temporal politics in just one nation of the eart. We need spiritual food. We need the word. The old testament deeply explained.
Be careful what you wish for. The Jewish bible is not exactly compatible with the religion of Christianity. "Hear, O Israel: The Lord is our God; the Lord is one." Deut. 6:4
@@waitstill7091 I'm israeli and it's 3 with an Ayin like in arabic the original pronunciation. It seems you don't know hebrew at all Stop embarrassing yourself lol
@@treksta2009 Are you saying to know the Jewish bible, you have to speak and read Hebrew? Do you believe you have to speak and read Greek to know the N.T.?
Meaning of God is One clearly explained in simple terms…. What does it mean when god says that he is one? Does it mean one person? Not necessarily, in all of scripture (old and new testament) god doesn’t describe himself as one person. One can mean many things. For example, the United States of America, there is only one America but it consists of multiple states. Another example is the word Family. Family is singular, but by definition it means 2 or more persons. So when the word family is used, it always implies 2 or more persons. The word god used in the Old Testament is the word ‘Elohim’, which is understood as a singular sense, but by definition it’s plurality in one. We should allow god to define what one god means. God clearly reveals himself as One god (Elohim), which consists of the father, the son, and the Holy Spirit, and that there is no other god besides this god which he has revealed. Just as when you say there is only one family (multiple persons) living on that street, when god says he is one god (Elohim), by definition it’s plurality in one, and as he has clearly revealed the plurality within the one is the father, son, and Holy Spirit, Or in the Old Testament as Lord, another lord or angel of the lord, and spirit of the lord/god. When we hear the word one applied to god we mistakenly assume one person, when this is not how god defines himself in the Bible. Plus on top of that, the word one used in Deuteronomy 6:4 is the word ‘Echad’ which can mean compound unity. Echad is the same word used in genesis 2:24, a man and his wife shall become one (Echad) flesh. 2 become one. The father, son, and holy spirit are in perfect eternal unity. Read the below statement again in light of the Hebrew words used and in light of all of god’s revelation of himself in scripture, and who god is should be crystal clear…. Deuteronomy 6:4 “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God (Elohim - plurality in one), the Lord is one (Echad - compound unity)!”
This Joshua, son of Jehozadak is of a lineage of priests whose father was Seraiah and cannot possibly be referencing Yeshua because Jesus was not from a lineage of (Levi)who were Levitical priests but from Judah. Also, within this same context, this Joshua is being told about a man called The Branch(who is Yeshua/Jesus) who will build the Temple of the Lord because He will be the one to sit on David's throne. We need to stay in scriptural context.
Dr Brown, Greetings. I am a Christian and a believer in the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ but I do not believe in the Triune God doctrine you Trinitarians believe in as I believe this was a latter doctrine imposed on the church and to which the vast majority of independent scholarly sources have confirmed - including Catholic Trinitarian sources themselves. I agree with you regarding the messiah being prophetically spoken about in the OT and I disagree with Rabbi Singer regarding his claims in this regard and you have made very good arguments refuting his claims in this regard. However, I believe that the point Tovia makes in Heb 1:5 is a valid point which still stands and which I do not believe you refuted. The scriptures clearly say: Heb 1:5 New International Version For to which of the angels did God ever say, “You are my Son; today I have become your Father"? Or again, “I will be his Father, and he will be my Son"? Your argument that the angel of the LORD in the OT is a special and unique angel does not invalidate the point Tovia makes. The point is that all angelic beings are in that same class of "Elohim" (angelic non human beings) - whether we are referring to angels such as Michael, Gabriel or the Malak in the OT called the Angel of the LORD, etc. They all would fall under the category of "angels". Therefore, if the scriptures say that God NEVER said to ANY of the angels "“You are my Son; today I have become your Father", then it becomes self refuting to say that Jesus was the angel of the LORD in the OT or that would make the Hebrew writer a liar. If the Hebrew writer understood that Jesus was that angel of Yahweh in the OT, he would have acknowledged that exception in Heb 1:5 but he clearly said that God never said to ANY angel at any time (he NEVER gave any exception), thus confirming that the angel of the LORD in the OT cannot be the same person as Jesus of the New Testament. Blessings
Exodus 23:20 Behold, I send an Angel before thee, to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared. 21 Beware of him, and OBEY his voice, provoke him not; for he will not pardon your transgressions: for MY NAME IS IN HIM. 22 But if thou shalt indeed obey his voice, and do all that I speak; then I will be an enemy unto thine enemies, and an adversary unto thine adversaries. (Exodus 15:3-The LORD is a MAN of war: the LORD is his name.)
It's been a few years but I know somewhere I've got it saved that the OT shows the "angel of the Lord" is both a Christophany and also not one. I think it was either Zephaniah or Zechariah where the "angel of the Lord" is not Jesus. But not sure. Might be another book.
Don't forget Dan 7:9-14 9, I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire. 10, A fiery stream issued and came forth from before him: thousand thousands ministered to him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him: the judgment was set, and the books were opened. 11, I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spoke: I beheld even till the beast was slain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame. 12, As concerning the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time. 13, I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. 14, And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed. Who is the Son of Man in this passage? Yeshua!
The matter of religion is very simple. You pick one and then you go on with your journey. No religion will say they are teaching falsehood. Messianics will stick to their beliefs and the Jews, theirs. Nobody can change one's beliefs except for themselves.
When I read the commentary of Rashi on the Angel of the Lord says, I saw that Tovia Singer was a story teller. Rashi says that this Angel is above and different from other angels. Rashi says that the Angel of the Lord is God coming into the World in His lowest position. Tovia Singer is deceptive.
A genuine question I have is that If the Angel of the Lord is indeed Jesus, why does he speak and sound as God the Father does in the OT and not as Jesus does in the NT? The way Jesus speaks about himself, his Father, and about himself in accordance to his Father is VERY different than how Jesus sounds in the NT (maybe this is just how the English translations come off).
So let me get this straight...If I say, to which of The Policemen got the award, does that mean, no policemen got the award? Yet, because Hebrews say (to which of the angels, has God ever say you are my son... therefore that means, It's saying Jesus (can't be an Angel)? Or are people, just saying, that verse can't be stated no other way, than saying Jesus isn't an angel?
Yeah but when Jacob is giving the blessings he specifically calls out THE angel to bless as well as YHWH. And in Jude it says the Jesus saved a people out of Egypt. And what about all the times YHWH says “my name is in him” or in Genesis when it says “YHWH called out fire from YHWH in Heaven..”
@@Hezron389 Exodus 32 4 He took [them] from their hand[s], fashioned it with an engraving tool, and made it into a molten calf, upon which they said: "These are your gods, O Israel, who have brought you up from the land of Egypt!"
John 1:1-2 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. The Word of the Lord is the Angel of the Lord. (The Word manifested as The Angel. The Word of the Lord was later mentioned in the flesh as Yeshua the Son of God.
I’ve watched many of Singer’s videos and found him to be highly deceptive in his presentations. I wish you could do another debate with him so many more Jews would come to Christ as the result!
I’ve watched a few of Tovia singers videos. His arguments are very very confusing and they don’t flow at all. It feels like he’s making things up as he goes along. And there are many many times that he is blatantly lying about the messianic movement and the New Testament. Plus I’ve noticed he has a bit of a pattern. I’ve looked at his entire list of videos on TH-cam. The majority of his videos are about him trying to “debunk Jesus”(not much else) and debating People who are either newborn Christians, believers who think the Torah should be ignored, or pastors who do not fully study the Torah. I have not seen him have a second debate with Rabbi Brown here or with any other Messianic rabbi(like rabbi Schneider, Baruch Korman, Jonathan Cahn, etc). I’ve seen his debate with Rabbi Brown from 1991 on a TH-cam video and Rabbi Singer didn’t do well. Actually I’ve only seen Rabbi Singer debate one other messianic rabbi(I think it was from 95) but I will admit that rabbi was very rude to singer. That rabbi kept on interrupting singer but Rabbi Brown was very very polite in his debate. So yeah Rabbi Singer is not a reliable source. I’m still sticking with Yeshua 🕎 and nobody can change my mind.
Then you do not study the word of God- If you would have studied the word of God then you would have realized 1)that jesus cant be God. 2)jesus can't be a sacrifice. 3)Jesus cant redeem the wicked 4)the woman who is to give birth in the book of Isaiah is actually the wife of Isaiah and not a futuristic Mary. The text even specifies that the woman had intercourse which resulted in pregnancy. 5) the word virgin was never used.
@@yashawngray9289 and like I said before Singer is a hypocrite. Yes it’s true ancient Christians did take Bible verses out of context. Every single Messianic Rabbi teaches this. Historical fact. But singer does the same thing & he makes a lot of bizarre claims with no historical evidence. For example: he actually said that the apostles faked their deaths. There is not a single bit of historical evidence for that and if you really think about it the apostles had nothing to gain from “faking” their deaths. Then he says “The synagogue of the enemy” verse from the book of revelation is antisemitic but no it’s talking about congregations that welcome evil world ways(that goes for mega Christian churches, Catholic Churches, and synagogues). So yeah Singer is not a reliable source when it comes to studying the Bible.
@@yashawngray9289 and one more thing yes Dr. Brown did mention that the verse didn’t translate to “virgin” but still he did show us many other verses within the Old Testament that tells us about the birth of Messiah Yeshua.
@@yashawngray9289 So yes I do study of the word of God. I’ve learned a whole lot from Dr. Brown, Rabbi Schneider, and other Messianic Rabbis. And I challenge you to listen to their analysis videos of the scriptures.
WHEN GOD HARDEN SOMEONE’S HEART, ONLY HE CAN UN-HARDEN IT. The primary reason Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah is because (as a whole) God has blinded their eyes (Romans 11:7-8) and hardened their hearts for a season to allow the fullness of the gentiles to come into God's kingdom. (Romans 11:25) This is part of God's sovereign plan of salvation and until God's timing is complete that national blindness and hardness will not change.
Dr. Brown, you are a light to the church, stay strong.
Dr Michael brown, you’ve blown my mind. Learning from you has began to make everything real to me
Jesus is Lord!!!
@@TechWithSally4D read Isaiah 53
@@TechWithSally4D i answered you , as your Qur'an says "go to the people of the book", well im telling you. Read Isaiah 53 and you will find the answer to your question
Hallelujah!!
@@mariahvilla2354 🙌🏻
Jesus cant be discussed explicitly in the jewish Bible because ha hadnt yet revealed himself in history
"But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same veil untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which veil is done away in Christ. But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the veil is upon their heart."
2 Corinthians 3:14-15 KJV
Thank you Lord Jesus for Dr Brown. Bless his ministry
I heard this rabbi many times. He isn't stupid, he's just plain deceptive.
Yup, the super-smart w/o wisdom are so dangerous
And deceived.
The only people who are deceived are you people
I got the same vibe about Singer. I made all these points on one of his interviews lol
I didn't listen to this video. I only saw the title, and then I seen your comment because it was on top. And I don't know or care about what he had to say. But I know this. If he was saying that Jesus is the Angel of Jehovah/the LORD, then he's absolutely right about that. And here's where you can find that. Zechariah 12:8 it says "In that day the one who is feeble among them will be like David and the house of David will be like God, like the Angel of Jehovah/the LORD that goes before them. So this is a two part verse. Answer the first part of the verse and it gives you the answer to the second part. And the reason it's a two part verse is because of the comma that splits it in the middle. So let's look at what the first part says. The house of David will be "like" God. Who in the lineage of David is most like God from David all the way down to Jesus???
The answer is Jesus. Jesus is most like God.
And this answer gives you the answer to the second part of the verse which says "will be like God, like the Angel of Jehovah/the LORD that goes before them. That comma is a continuation of the sentence and it means that whatever the answer is for the first part is the answer to the second and here's where you can find where the Angel goes before them. Exodus 23:20, 21(it's actually in Exodus 3 times but this one is my favorite, you can find the others at 14:19 and 32:34) so here's what 23:20,21 says "I am sending an angel ahead of you to guard you on your way into the place I have prepared for you, Pay attention to him and obey his voice, do not rebel against him for he will not pardon your transgressions because my name is in him.
So he said my name is in him. Do you know what Jesus' name means?? It means Jehovah is salvation. His name is in him. Huh!! And what Angel has the Power to not pardon transgressions?? Jesus has that power for sure. Here's what's up. Jesus is the Angel that spoke to Moses in the burning bush and he is the Angel that wrestled with Jacob in Genesis and he is the Angel that spoke to Balaam and appeared to Balaam's donkey, and he's the Angel that spoke to Manoah in Judges. This is why Jesus is called the WORD of God because he speaks for God. John 5:37 says, "You have neither seen his form, nor heard his voice at any time." So if no one has heard God's voice then that means that it's Jesus speaking for Jehovah his father. Don't be fooled by your religion that says differently. Jesus is the greatest thing that God ever Created
“At that time Jesus said, “I praise You, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that You have hidden these things from the wise and intelligent, and have revealed them to infants.” Matthew 11:25 NASB
I think you should start a series called, "Tovia Singer - Fact Check" !
Love how he debunks Sr. Singer. Haha. Love these videos. Dr. Brown gets Down. 😂 🕊️🙏🏼👍🏼 good stuff.. Keep it going Sr.Brown... NO PAIN NO GLORY....🕊️👍🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🥊🥊🥊
At best, Singer does a lot of "cherry picking". At worst, he is too full of hate to attract real believers of any stripe?
@@locovaldezakarichardmccart843 yes indeed LOCO.... 🕊️🙏🏼👍🏼 i heard he dosnt want to debate Dr. Brown anymore. Lol....🤣😎🙏🏼👍🏼🕊️
What is wrong with you people?
Brown did not disprove anything nor is he able to because he is on the side of the liars
This is what I love, when Dr Brown stays in his wheelhouse. This is where he really shines : )
Agree
@@TechWithSally4D why are you copy pasting the same comment everywhere? Are you actually with an honest heart searching for an answer or are you just here to dump your supposed clever question thinking you got us and then ignore all the responses?
@@menknurlan
People can ignore you if they wish, they don't have to speak to you.
For unto us a Child is born, Unto us a Son is given; And the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, *Mighty God, EVERLASTING* Father, Prince of Peace. - Isaiah 9:6.
Praise the Lord for He is worthy to be praised as the Father is praised
Praise JOSHUA THE CHRIST
Hallelujah!!!❤️❤️❤️
@@mariahvilla2354 Joshua the christ saves
@@cyrilsneer5957 Yeshua💕💕
Of the greatness of his government and peace
there will be no end.
He will reign on David’s throne
and over his kingdom,
establishing and upholding it
with justice and righteousness
from that time on and forever.
The zeal of the Lord Almighty
will accomplish this.
You left this portion out. This has not occurred, and thus, they don't believe the Jesus is the Messiah.
Thank you Brother Michael, I decided to dig through Rabbi Singer content over the last week and have been feeling incredibly discouraged, even though I know what I believe to be true. I don’t feel like it is a coincidence that both your video, and the newest Ehrman debate, occurred over these last few days in my time and need. Again, thank you again, it is great to know you
What was that Ehrman debate about?
@@Akhil_Chilukapati The debate was about the Resurrection, and he debated with Mike Licona. th-cam.com/video/TjbguvY0f-Y/w-d-xo.html
@@Akhil_Chilukapati Bart Ehrman has many interesting bits of info but maybe only proves what JESUS warned about with added traditions and regulations and corruptions of organized religion?
@@locovaldezakarichardmccart843
But , you know Bart Ehrman is weak at Christain theology
@@Akhil_Chilukapati Oh yeah, Bart is missing all the great benefits of seeing the wisdom and being born-again, etc
Always a blessing listening to
I believe God raised you up for this very purpose; to be a light and guide to many.
God bless Dr. Brown
Praise the Lord! Michael Brown destroys this Rabbis arguments against Jesus Christ. This is a major problem with these Rabbis. They are either spiritually blind or they are not being totally honest with scripture. It is actually both.
@@TechWithSally4D Obviously you have not read the Bible. Jesus said He was laying His life down voluntarily. He had to die for mankind to be saved from their sins. Then He rose from the dead demonstrating He is the eternal Son of God.
Bottom line: stick mainly with solid principles of spiritual wisdom (like many don't understand in the Parables)
Tovia Singer is the modern Pharisee that JESUS confronted because of their hypocrisy.
@@redmegas6255 Actually, he is worse than a Pharisee cuz he has been influenced by the Masoretes (6th-9th centuries A.D.) and by medieval men who lived under Islamic rule and were influenced by Islam (nonsense such as Rebekah being three or ten or fourteen when Prophet Isaac married her). Also, there is no *complete* manuscript of the Talmud from before the 14th century A.D.; so, they there is no proof for what they have attributed to people who lived in 200 A.D. and to people who lived in 500 A.D.
2:56 tovia's argument is borderline dishonest. The term "angel" both in Hebrew and Greek simply means messenger. it's a functional term which simply denotes function or role. based on the surrounding context, it can refer to humans and created spirits. (humans:- Gen 32:3 James 2:25 spirit creatures Gen 28:12 Mathew 4:6 Deity Gen 31:10-13)
in Heb 1, the entire point of the author is to show how The Son is greater than the angels. the ones being called "angels" are spirit creatures. it explicitly says that in Heb 1:14
" Are not all angels *ministering spirits* sent to serve those who will inherit salvation? " Heb 1:14
the ones being called angels in the context are created ministering spirits. we don't claim The Angel of The Lord is a ministering spirit, but The Lord.
plus, by quoting Psal 104:4, the author identifies the angels spoken of in the chapter as creatures who were made by God, to be like flames of fire. which means the ones who are being called angels in the context are created spirit beings.
" In speaking of the angels he says, “He makes his angels spirits, and his servants *flames of fire* " Heb 1:7
Singer is outright lying about the christian position. The Son is greater than spirit creatures. because he is deity as to his nature. the reason he was called "Angel" in the old testament is because he was the messenger of The Father
Jesus is the truth!
I want to give Singer the benefit of the doubt. Were he any less knowledgeable, he might deserve it. But he knows all too what he's saying are not true.
Please keep making these, it really helps
I love it Dr. Brown, when you do this type of videos. More Theology, less politics. Shalom
amen
@@TechWithSally4D it was the only way he could face death, when he was put to death he trapped satan, in his body. By doing this Yah, was able to judge and condemn the devil. putting death to death in Yeshua and raise him up out of it; Seating him @ the right hand of the most high
Yah does not execute satan , @ this point, but casts him out of the body of Yeshua. If Yah executed him, we all would of been destroyed, because we all were in Adam.
Now @ this time we are given the opportunity to, accept Yeshua and escape death, by accepting Yeshua. who Yah raised from the dead, restoring us in Yeshua, to right standing with Yah. By putting us to death in messiah, Yah separates are Yah, breathed soul, from the sinful nature of the flesh, putting it to death in Yeshua and raises us up in him pure and clean.
*Thats why they were allowed to murder him.*
The very word redemption indicates that there is a separation with man, from yah. Why would we need to be bought back if we never were sold?
*My Righteous Servant The Branch*
Isaiah 53 : 9--;
And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth.
10Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand.
11He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities.
12Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors..
So true! Unfortunately, Dr. Brown is focused these days way more on the political/cultural side, than on theology, answering to rabbis, etc.
Agreed. Evangelicals need to shut up about politics
Evangelicals can "shut up" about politics when the left wing atheists do. Our when the God-hating Marxists do. Our when any number of other religious-at-the-heart groups do.
Fortunately, at least for now, in this country you don't get to shut someone up just because you don't like what they're saying. Or because you're occasionally convicted of sin in your life.
I think Dr. Brown is probably the only Christian evangelist that could debate Tobia Singer and hold his ground. And he's the only one I know who has
Actually our brothers over at one for Israel is very well versed in the Hebrew scriptures, and they debate Orthodox Rabbis all the time, and they are very successful in debating them.
He's a messianic jew
@@cyrilsneer5957 Are you speaking about Dr Brown?
@@calvinrobinson1603 yup.
@@cyrilsneer5957 Yes he is, I thoroughly enjoy his ministry.
This was great, thank you, Dr Brown!
This was such an awesome video, and so informative! Thank you so much!
thank you and bless you brother
Loved this thank you so much.
Many thanks 🙏
Sounds like the two powers in heaven idea that Dr. Michael Heiser speaks about. Rabbinic tradition threw this idea out as a heresy sometime after the Crucifixion and Ascension.
Definitely on the same wavelength. I’m currently reading Dr. Heiser’s “The Unseen Realm.” Have you gone through it?
Hello Dr Brown. I've always loved the verse in Proverbs where it is said:Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? who hath gathered the wind in his fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? what is his name, and what is his son's name, if thou canst tell? Surely this is the father and the son. what would Rabbi Singer have to say concerning this scripture? Ty and God bless!
Thank you dr brown.
Thank you Dr. Brown we really have no way to refute the Hebrew scriptures arguments if the Hebrew speaking Rabbi says it's mistranslated . But we trust you, blessings.
That may have been true at one time, but it's not true today. The internet is leveling the playing field.
No, there’s several angles you can proof your faith and use to corner them in for their misdoings. The age of the LLX, as translation from a Hebrew text that’s older than the masoretic text they use,reads differently from the masoretic text that they use to formulate their arguments against Christ. There are a hand full of masoretic text that support the English translations in support of Yeshua being moshieachk. The Dead Sea scrolls is another witness against them.
You're a blessing! Thank you
So so so good!! 🔥
Shalom. Toda raba 🙏
I met Rabbi Tovia Singer in Jerusalem in November 2019 when I testified to him about what Yeshua has done in my life, that I was completely changed by him from Jew-hater to someone who loves the Jews Tovia Singer could not say more about it. In the end, he just wanted to discuss.
Loved this video. May Our Lord Christ Jesus open the hearts of all Jewish people and everyone who don't know Him yet. That they all may come to love Him and know Him in Spirit and in Truth. Amen
Amazing dr Brown!!!!! GOD bless you. Classic example of the blindness over God's beloved Israel. For us Christians let the bible speak dont put false doctrines us many do to say what they want to hear.... romans 9 as an example some Christians take compleatly out of contest ..... God is good and Israel eyes will be open .....
Thanks God for Dr brown ,the perfect antidote
The Contemporary Torah, Jewish Publication Society, 2006
Genesis 48:16
הַמַּלְאָךְ֩ הַגֹּאֵ֨ל אֹתִ֜י מִכׇּל־רָ֗ע יְבָרֵךְ֮ אֶת־הַנְּעָרִים֒ וְיִקָּרֵ֤א בָהֶם֙ שְׁמִ֔י וְשֵׁ֥ם אֲבֹתַ֖י אַבְרָהָ֣ם וְיִצְחָ֑ק וְיִדְגּ֥וּ לָרֹ֖ב בְּקֶ֥רֶב הָאָֽרֶץ׃
The Messenger who has redeemed me from all harm-
Bless the lads.
In them may my name be recalled,
And the names of my fathers Abraham and Isaac,
And may they be teeming multitudes upon the earth.”
Yeshuah! - Our Saviour.
Zec. 6:11 etc.
Christianity is living in Rabbi Singers head rent free.
Sad Christianity doesn't exist
@@cyrilsneer5957 Read Steven’s speech to the Sanhedrin in Acts 7.
@@1littlefish can you show me which verse says "Christianity". Acts 11:26 doesnt. Acts 17:11 applies in this case
@@cyrilsneer5957 please read Isaiah 53
@@1littlefish can't find the word Christianity there.
Singer knew his audience's lot of a muslim they will eat everthing that came out from his mouth without checking
Great video Brother!
This came to me while watching this episode:
First, the Levitical priesthood was established, then, hundreds of years later, the kings were anointed.
Well, first Jesus came as a priest to atone for our sins, then He comes as the Ruling King over all the world!
Isaiah 63. It is impossible for any honest person to read that and not see 3 persons yet one God
There is a fundemental difference between Michael Brown and Rabbi Zinger. The later is using tactics and rethorics while Brown is keen on Truth. This is why every argument by Zinger is so easily demolished using scripture
That is a lie
I love how you Liars can't even back yourselves up
I find these vary occurrences in the Old Testament very compelling. There are others you did not address that I have read where the angel of the Lord speaks as the Lord himself. That is hard to reconcile as a Jew I would imagine. It synchronized very well with Gods revealed tripartite nature in the New Testament especially since the Spirit is revealed in Genesis as hovering over the waters.
👏👏👏
In John 17, Jesus tells you where he was and who he was with before the world was.
HE was known as the Angel of the Lord before we knew Him as Jesus/Yeshua.
King James Version in Philippians 2:6-8 says this about Jesus:
Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men; And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of a ...
genesis 1:26-27
we will make man in our image.god walked with adam
Imam Tovia Singer with his dishonest games once again, dude really tried to argue that capitalization was a scam LOOL.
Great work exposing him once again Dr.Brown
HALLELUJAH HALLELUJAH HALLELUJAH PRAISE THE LORD HISUS CHRISTOS PRINCE OF PEACE ALL MIGHTY GOD AND THE GREAT CONCEALER AMEN.
Anyone know any good books on this topic? Specifically the topic of the Angel of the Lord
Mathew 11:25 At that time Joshua answering said, 'I do confess to Thee, Father, Lord of the heavens and of the earth, that thou didst hide these things from wise and understanding ones, and didst reveal them to babes.
I use the name of the Branch.
THANK YOU THANK YOU!! Dr Brown I know you catch a lot of flack but I want you to know to speak the truth until the end
God the almighty and Jesus/Yeshua is great and good worship them!
None is good - except God.
Jesus tells us not to call him good, because only God is good.
the best michael brown, eitan bar, moishe rosen against the jews, sam shamoun against Muslims
Their is an issue of Humbleness with Rabbi, unless they humble themselves and know the purpose of the lord even choosing a nation Israel to fullfull his purpose of sending the messiah Yeshua to them and for the whole world...unless they understand this they wont understand the rest
Can you also do.a video in ARM of the Lord? Is the ARM of the Lord also The Angel of the Lord?
👍
Love Dr Browns videos but I'm so confused at the Joshua son of Jehozadak references.. Isn't he a totally different guy to Jesus? Rarely have I heard this as prophecy or anything
*_VERSE 12 describes this same person as THE BRANCH_*
10 “Shout and be glad, Daughter Zion. For I am coming, and I will live among you,” declares the Lord. 11 “Many nations will be joined with the Lord in that day and will become my people. I will live among you and you will know that the Lord Almighty has sent me to you. 12 The Lord will inherit Judah as his portion in the holy land and will again choose Jerusalem. 13 Be still before the Lord, all mankind, because he has roused himself from his holy dwelling.”
Zech 2 is pretty explicit
I don't know what is wrong with Imam Tovia, but he is so full of hate, contempt towards Christianity, yet he is so welcoming and shows profound love, respect to muslims and towards Islam, when he fully knows the quran call the Jewish people as decedents of Apes and pigs.
“Imam Tovia” LOOOOL I’m using that from now on, super accurate 😂
Verses like these are not exactly Jewish friendly. "Beware of the dogs, beware of the evil workers, beware of the false circumcision.... Philippians 3:2
@@waitstill7091 Wow, way to rip a verse out of its context. Are you that desperate to find verses with antisemitism that you have to lie.
Paul ( the author) is writing concerning those who were *forcing* gentile Christians to be circumcised and were boasting about their righteousness based off their circumcised flesh.
The insult is not towards all Jews/circumcised individuals. Paul himself is a circumcised Jew as he elaborates in verses 4-8 and he circumcised Timothy, his problem is only with those who force it on gentiles (like in Galatians 5) or those boasting about their flesh.
Again by your logic, Paul a circumcised man would be calling himself a dog and evil doer.
@@sjappiyah4071 Paul discarded his Jewish ways and called it garbage. "For his sake I have discarded everything else, counting it all as garbage, so that I could gain Christ." Philippians 3:8
@@waitstill7091 It’s not solely his Jewish heritage, but EVERYTHING he discarded for the sake of Christ. Once again, ripping words out of context
I often wonder if Rabbi Singer orders a Dr. Brown's with his pastrami?
The Trinity is clearly taught in the Tanakh. Malak Yahveh is the pre-incarnate Word of God. Malak means messenger, not angel. It can refer to angelic servants of God, but also to human messengers and of course THE messenger of Yahveh.
It is Moses's mistake , he thought it was the angel of the Lord who had appeared to him but God says no I'm not an angel " I'm who I'm " I'm God of Ibrahim , Isaac and Jacob .
@@ivanniyeha4229 where does God say i am not the angel?
@@ivanniyeha4229 second, why does the text say he is God? (notice it's the text which says this)
@@samsont7786 " cherubim means the one burning fire", theologically angels are made up by fire , in common sense Moses seeing a burning bush with fire would have sought it was an angel , but he was mistaken because even fire signifies the divine presence , " the seven candlesticks of burning fire known as manorah " in the temple signified the spirit of the Lord: , in holy Bible no any angel has ever claimed being divine with the exception of Satan " Lucifer "
the manorah represented the tree of life , what did Moses actually see , a burning bush ???, I think no but " tree of life " , the burning manorah signified , the spirit of life , the spirit of wisdom , of understanding , of fortitude , knowledge , counsel ,piety and fear of the Lord, " the seven spirits of the Lord.,this means Moses was also filled with the holy Spirit at the incident , actually it was Moses's Pentecost
Tovia Singer aligns with Islamic concepts as per convenience.
*_Tovia is the Spirit of the Antichrist - he deceives deliberately_*
The arm of Yahuah is the Malach of Yahuah.
WHO has believed our report? and to whom is the arm of Yahuah revealed? YESHA'YAHU (ISAIAH) 53:1 את CEPHER
Who is Jozadek, dr Brown?
What's also interesting is how the Angel of the Lord speaks as Yahweh himself, yet also speaks to Yahweh in Heaven. Just as Jesus.
Zechariah 1:12
New International Version
12 Then the angel of the Lord said, “Lord Almighty, how long will you withhold mercy from Jerusalem and from the towns of Judah, which you have been angry with these seventy years?”
who was jacob saying to bless me . and he says ive seen god and lived actually held on till the angel of the lord says.
God bless you, Dr Brown. I’m right there with you, shoulder to shoulder as a brother in Christ. I guess what gets confusing is angels are an actual category of being, actually below humans on the pecking order, if you want to put it crudely. So when Scripture states that God appears as an angel, I think that phraseology is unfortunate (not to be critical of the writer) because it can make a reader think that God is an angel. He’s no such thing. He’s God. But I’m not going to argue with the writer because I have no such right. Obviously God can do as He pleases. I guess in the end the message can be that it’s trying to convey that Jesus (Christophany) is the Angel. I need to think and study more on this. But thank you so much for what you do. God bless you
1000% he is.
Tovia's insufferable. But as a spiritual descendant of not the Sadduccees but the Pharisees, he can't help but be that way-- I can almost hear Tovia's voice in the teachers of the law when they tried to trick Jesus with their questions...
(BUT I PRAY FOR TOVIA regularly-- that God will show him Messiah-- That Jesus, Yeshua, will meet him on his road to Damascus... )!
I honestly try not to refer to Rabbi Tovia as a joke but he makes it exceptionally difficult, and that's without scholars like yourself responding to him. What he says is almost like comedy sometimes.
Tovia deliberately deceives
Thank you Dr. Brown - keep rebuking Tovia Singer!
No one fears this lustful deceiver.
@@waffles2waffles 😳 🤣🤣🤣
I've listened to Rabbi Singer many times. Most often Singer misquotes, distorts or outright lies about the New Testament or/and our beliefs. He reminds me of the over the top angry Pharisees attacking and deflecting in the NT.
The NET Bible comments on Genesis 16:7:
“Some identify the angel of the Lord as the preincarnate Christ…
However, it is more likely that the angel merely represents the Lord; he can speak for the Lord because he is sent with the Lord’s full authority. In some cases the angel is clearly distinct from the Lord (see Judg. 6:11-23). It is not certain if the same angel is always in view. Though the proper name following the noun ‘angel’ makes the construction definite [grammatically], this may simply indicate that a definite angel sent from the Lord is referred to in any given context. It need not be the same angel on every occasion. Note the analogous expression ‘the servant of the LORD’ which refers to various individuals in the OT.”
Similarly, in Deuteronomy 15:17 God commands masters to take an awl and put it through the ear of a servant.
The Hebrew here literally says “the awl,” but are we to suppose there was one specific awl that was kept since the time of Moses and used all the time?
Of course not.
Also, the Bible speaks of plural “angels of God” (Gen. 28:12; 32:1); these are clearly the same as angels of the LORD (see Ps. 103:20).
Totally agree that the majority of things the Jews observe and do are not found in scripture but are Rabbinic teaching made up by them as their oral law not God's Law as Jesus Himself said "You do make void the commandment of God by your traditions" "You put burdens on others which you yourselves do-not do" We need to stick to Scripture.
Hi Dr. Brown, you are an angel of the Lord (Hey do not tag me for not capitalizing the 'a' in angel).
The verses Dr. Brown quotes - this ANGEL OF THE LORD identifies as God.
Some jewish sources say that Metatron is Messiah ben Yosef.
We love Singer but does he love us?
No. If he did he would not deceive his people with lies
Please more of this bible studies and LESS POLITICS. We dont care so much for temporal politics in just one nation of the eart. We need spiritual food. We need the word. The old testament deeply explained.
Be careful what you wish for. The Jewish bible is not exactly compatible with the religion of Christianity. "Hear, O Israel: The Lord is our God; the Lord is one." Deut. 6:4
@@waitstill7091 Says the one who cannot even speak 3vrith haha
@@treksta2009 Do you mean Ivrit? Do you speak Hebrew?
@@waitstill7091 I'm israeli and it's 3 with an Ayin like in arabic the original pronunciation. It seems you don't know hebrew at all
Stop embarrassing yourself lol
@@treksta2009 Are you saying to know the Jewish bible, you have to speak and read Hebrew? Do you believe you have to speak and read Greek to know the N.T.?
Wow. That was a blood bath. lol
Meaning of God is One clearly explained in simple terms….
What does it mean when god says that he is one? Does it mean one person? Not necessarily, in all of scripture (old and new testament) god doesn’t describe himself as one person. One can mean many things. For example, the United States of America, there is only one America but it consists of multiple states. Another example is the word Family. Family is singular, but by definition it means 2 or more persons. So when the word family is used, it always implies 2 or more persons. The word god used in the Old Testament is the word ‘Elohim’, which is understood as a singular sense, but by definition it’s plurality in one. We should allow god to define what one god means. God clearly reveals himself as One god (Elohim), which consists of the father, the son, and the Holy Spirit, and that there is no other god besides this god which he has revealed. Just as when you say there is only one family (multiple persons) living on that street, when god says he is one god (Elohim), by definition it’s plurality in one, and as he has clearly revealed the plurality within the one is the father, son, and Holy Spirit, Or in the Old Testament as Lord, another lord or angel of the lord, and spirit of the lord/god. When we hear the word one applied to god we mistakenly assume one person, when this is not how god defines himself in the Bible.
Plus on top of that, the word one used in Deuteronomy 6:4 is the word ‘Echad’ which can mean compound unity. Echad is the same word used in genesis 2:24, a man and his wife shall become one (Echad) flesh. 2 become one. The father, son, and holy spirit are in perfect eternal unity.
Read the below statement again in light of the Hebrew words used and in light of all of god’s revelation of himself in scripture, and who god is should be crystal clear….
Deuteronomy 6:4 “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God (Elohim - plurality in one), the Lord is one (Echad - compound unity)!”
While I personally dont think the Angel of the Lord is Jesus, Tovia is a well known deceiver. I developed my entire channel based on refuting him.
The verses Dr. Brown quotes - this ANGEL OF THE LORD identifies as God.
This Joshua, son of Jehozadak is of a lineage of priests whose father was Seraiah and cannot possibly be referencing Yeshua because Jesus was not from a lineage of (Levi)who were Levitical priests but from Judah. Also, within this same context, this Joshua is being told about a man called The Branch(who is Yeshua/Jesus) who will build the Temple of the Lord because He will be the one to sit on David's throne. We need to stay in scriptural context.
Dr Brown, Greetings.
I am a Christian and a believer in the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ but I do not believe in the Triune God doctrine you Trinitarians believe in as I believe this was a latter doctrine imposed on the church and to which the vast majority of independent scholarly sources have confirmed - including Catholic Trinitarian sources themselves. I agree with you regarding the messiah being prophetically spoken about in the OT and I disagree with Rabbi Singer regarding his claims in this regard and you have made very good arguments refuting his claims in this regard.
However, I believe that the point Tovia makes in Heb 1:5 is a valid point which still stands and which I do not believe you refuted. The scriptures clearly say:
Heb 1:5
New International Version
For to which of the angels did God ever say, “You are my Son; today I have become your Father"? Or again, “I will be his Father, and he will be my Son"?
Your argument that the angel of the LORD in the OT is a special and unique angel does not invalidate the point Tovia makes. The point is that all angelic beings are in that same class of "Elohim" (angelic non human beings) - whether we are referring to angels such as Michael, Gabriel or the Malak in the OT called the Angel of the LORD, etc. They all would fall under the category of "angels".
Therefore, if the scriptures say that God NEVER said to ANY of the angels "“You are my Son; today I have become your Father", then it becomes self refuting to say that Jesus was the angel of the LORD in the OT or that would make the Hebrew writer a liar. If the Hebrew writer understood that Jesus was that angel of Yahweh in the OT, he would have acknowledged that exception in Heb 1:5 but he clearly said that God never said to ANY angel at any time (he NEVER gave any exception), thus confirming that the angel of the LORD in the OT cannot be the same person as Jesus of the New Testament.
Blessings
Exodus 23:20 Behold, I send an Angel before thee, to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared.
21 Beware of him, and OBEY his voice, provoke him not; for he will not pardon your transgressions: for MY NAME IS IN HIM.
22 But if thou shalt indeed obey his voice, and do all that I speak; then I will be an enemy unto thine enemies, and an adversary unto thine adversaries.
(Exodus 15:3-The LORD is a MAN of war: the LORD is his name.)
It's been a few years but I know somewhere I've got it saved that the OT shows the "angel of the Lord" is both a Christophany and also not one. I think it was either Zephaniah or Zechariah where the "angel of the Lord" is not Jesus. But not sure. Might be another book.
Don't forget Dan 7:9-14
9, I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.
10, A fiery stream issued and came forth from before him: thousand thousands ministered to him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him: the judgment was set, and the books were opened.
11, I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spoke: I beheld even till the beast was slain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame.
12, As concerning the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time.
13, I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.
14, And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.
Who is the Son of Man in this passage? Yeshua!
The matter of religion is very simple. You pick one and then you go on with your journey. No religion will say they are teaching falsehood. Messianics will stick to their beliefs and the Jews, theirs. Nobody can change one's beliefs except for themselves.
When I read the commentary of Rashi on the Angel of the Lord says, I saw that Tovia Singer was a story teller. Rashi says that this Angel is above and different from other angels.
Rashi says that the Angel of the Lord is God coming into the World in His lowest position.
Tovia Singer is deceptive.
A genuine question I have is that If the Angel of the Lord is indeed Jesus, why does he speak and sound as God the Father does in the OT and not as Jesus does in the NT? The way Jesus speaks about himself, his Father, and about himself in accordance to his Father is VERY different than how Jesus sounds in the NT (maybe this is just how the English translations come off).
That's because it's all Jesus and God the father has never been seen or heard.
So let me get this straight...If I say, to which of The Policemen got the award, does that mean, no policemen got the award? Yet, because Hebrews say (to which of the angels, has God ever say you are my son... therefore that means, It's saying Jesus (can't be an Angel)? Or are people, just saying, that verse can't be stated no other way, than saying Jesus isn't an angel?
Yeah but when Jacob is giving the blessings he specifically calls out THE angel to bless as well as YHWH. And in Jude it says the Jesus saved a people out of Egypt. And what about all the times YHWH says “my name is in him” or in Genesis when it says “YHWH called out fire from YHWH in Heaven..”
The part in Jude is a parallel text to the golden calf. Check it out.
Nothing new under the sun. All the idolatry is the same
@@Room-gf7vy to what ? What’s a parallel to the golden calf ?
@@Hezron389 Exodus 32
4 He took [them] from their hand[s], fashioned it with an engraving tool, and made it into a molten calf, upon which they said: "These are your gods, O Israel, who have brought you up from the land of Egypt!"
Jesus is a motionless Flat Earther with a dome/firmament over our heads and doesn't believe in fake space or fake space travel.
Hebrews 1 8 the Father said to Son. Your Throne O God. Hebrews 1 10 father said also to Son. With his hamds he created
John 1:1-2
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 The same was in the beginning with God.
The Word of the Lord is the Angel of the Lord. (The Word manifested as The Angel.
The Word of the Lord was later mentioned in the flesh as Yeshua the Son of God.
Doese Hebrew 1:5 disprove that angel of lord it's Jesus i didnt understand
I’ve watched many of Singer’s videos and found him to be highly deceptive in his presentations. I wish you could do another debate with him so many more Jews would come to Christ as the result!
Deceptive how?
@@fernandoalarcon8534
How doesn’t believe Jesus is the Messiah. Isn’t that enough? Lol
My heart breaks for Rabbi Singer.
*_Tovia is deliberately deceptive - he knows the truth but rejects it_*
I’ve watched a few of Tovia singers videos. His arguments are very very confusing and they don’t flow at all. It feels like he’s making things up as he goes along. And there are many many times that he is blatantly lying about the messianic movement and the New Testament. Plus I’ve noticed he has a bit of a pattern. I’ve looked at his entire list of videos on TH-cam. The majority of his videos are about him trying to “debunk Jesus”(not much else) and debating People who are either newborn Christians, believers who think the Torah should be ignored, or pastors who do not fully study the Torah. I have not seen him have a second debate with Rabbi Brown here or with any other Messianic rabbi(like rabbi Schneider, Baruch Korman, Jonathan Cahn, etc). I’ve seen his debate with Rabbi Brown from 1991 on a TH-cam video and Rabbi Singer didn’t do well. Actually I’ve only seen Rabbi Singer debate one other messianic rabbi(I think it was from 95) but I will admit that rabbi was very rude to singer. That rabbi kept on interrupting singer but Rabbi Brown was very very polite in his debate. So yeah Rabbi Singer is not a reliable source. I’m still sticking with Yeshua 🕎 and nobody can change my mind.
Then you do not study the word of God-
If you would have studied the word of God then you would have realized
1)that jesus cant be God.
2)jesus can't be a sacrifice.
3)Jesus cant redeem the wicked
4)the woman who is to give birth in the book of Isaiah is actually the wife of Isaiah and not a futuristic Mary. The text even specifies that the woman had intercourse which resulted in pregnancy.
5) the word virgin was never used.
@@yashawngray9289 and like I said before Singer is a hypocrite. Yes it’s true ancient Christians did take Bible verses out of context. Every single Messianic Rabbi teaches this. Historical fact. But singer does the same thing & he makes a lot of bizarre claims with no historical evidence. For example: he actually said that the apostles faked their deaths. There is not a single bit of historical evidence for that and if you really think about it the apostles had nothing to gain from “faking” their deaths. Then he says “The synagogue of the enemy” verse from the book of revelation is antisemitic but no it’s talking about congregations that welcome evil world ways(that goes for mega Christian churches, Catholic Churches, and synagogues). So yeah Singer is not a reliable source when it comes to studying the Bible.
@@yashawngray9289 and one more thing yes Dr. Brown did mention that the verse didn’t translate to “virgin” but still he did show us many other verses within the Old Testament that tells us about the birth of Messiah Yeshua.
@@yashawngray9289 So yes I do study of the word of God. I’ve learned a whole lot from Dr. Brown, Rabbi Schneider, and other Messianic Rabbis. And I challenge you to listen to their analysis videos of the scriptures.
And my comments keep getting deleted for some reason. Ah well 🤷🏽♂️
Where exactly is metatron in the hebrew bible? Yet tovia singer's masters say metatron is there. Even at mount Sinai.
I stopped using the name of Jesus in 2004
WHEN GOD HARDEN SOMEONE’S HEART, ONLY HE CAN UN-HARDEN IT.
The primary reason Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah is because (as a whole) God has blinded their eyes (Romans 11:7-8) and hardened their hearts for a season to allow the fullness of the gentiles to come into God's kingdom.
(Romans 11:25) This is part of God's sovereign plan of salvation and until God's timing is complete that national blindness and hardness will not change.
*_TOVIA IS DELIBERATELY DECEPTIVE_*
Also, "Angel" in Angel of the Lord actually translation is "Messager or Representative of Yahweh". He isn't a Angel. He is God