I'm an ex Royal Navy missile aimer. In the 70s we fired a sea slug missile (33ft long) during a test, and it went about a mile then into the sea. After about 30 seconds it came back out of the sea and towards the ship. That was a code brown moment!
I’ll bet every “Jack” needed a clean pair of underwear and a very, very large “wet” to accompany the McVities Digestives in such a situation. Normally a decent “wet” of Yorkshire tea would suffice but when a situation is beyond “brown trousers” and a cup of tea moment, there’s just nothing to beat a McVities Digestive bickie, unless its the chocolate covered version or the extra crumbly variety. Never let it be said that the British space agency doesn’t have emergency contingencies already in place which covers any and every possible eventuality. There’s simply nothing that can beat a good cup of tea and either a Rich Tea Biscuit, a nice Digestive, or it’s really serious you breakout the Chocolate Digestives or for a totally SNAFU of world ending proportions then it’s time for the Jaffa Cakes.
I was on a destroyer that did the R&D for the Tomahawk in 80 and 81...they used to fall into the drink pretty regular, but at least the didn't blow up.
US Navy here, on an Adams class DDG. The Tartar missile, as explained to me, had a primary heat seaker guidance, then a radar guidance, and when they failed, it switched over to Magnetic Anomaly Detection. So, here we are floating around on a huge slab of iron and aluminum. It was almost routine for those missiles to go out three or four miles, then loop around to come back at us. And, it was also routine for our gunners to blow it out of the sky. I was actually on deck to witness three such incidents, in 2 1/2 years aboard.
@@GetMoGaming No need to see everything first. Sometimes it is nice to know others share a sensibility ;-) Most people don't share mine because I don't believe in being politically correct. Everything doesn't have to be t-ball for adults.
@@thebookdoc.writing.and.editing "Great minds think alike" lol. Yeh I just think readers may think I'm copying, like I've thought before when I've seen two comments the same. (I always overthink) Just be yourself, I think is the moral. :)
All those people who travel long distances and endure weather and crowds and bad food, so they can then watch a LIVE space launch on the 8 inch screen of their phone. Bizarre.
yep, that's so stupid, I will never understand it. At least you hear the sound! but there are even dumber people, that stand in front of their phone to take a selfie!
@@markrainford1219 they take a selfie of themselves exactly when the rocket lifts up. They make several attempt to have their beloved picture, missing the most interesting scenes. sounds incredible I know, a girlfriend traveled to the US for that, most pictures were from her in front of rockets in the museum, and then at the start.
@@WeirdGuyOnTheInternet Hey, there's this old aerospace f_o-r_u-m I hang out at. Interested? If so I'll have to be very creative in getting the name to you. YT admins bots don't like that, and are very good at thwarting my attempts to others in the past.
@@WeirdGuyOnTheInternet The place I speak of is slowly dying, so I occasionally make recruiting attempts. It's not a cult or anything, but you might get mildly addicted to it, or not.
*How far away do you think that Proton M rocket explodes* @3:08? You can calculate the exact distance to the explosion from the sound delay - sound travels at (approx) 343 m/s at sea level and the delay is roughly 10.5 seconds, so 323 x 10.5 = 3601.5 m, which equates to 2.23 miles. It's about 2.23 miles away from the camera. Did you guess right? I didn't.
That’s some very expensive mistakes. The concussive shockwaves are really cool though, in some instances you can actually see the shockwave and hear it 10-20 seconds later.
the Chinese, sorry CCP are a evil regime, all other have their start pad far away from homes, cities etc. the CCP start ramp are near a city and have not even a self detonating device installed in case of mishaps
15:45 I'll try to keep this brief, but geek-out alert. The rocket is steered by 'gimballing' the engines (making them swivel a little bit to change the angle of the exhaust). There is a piece of software which controls those gimbals, and that software needs to react very fast, so as to make adjustments fast enough to keep the rocket stable. For the Ariane 5, they just used the same piece of software as for the Ariane 4. Ariane 4's processors were much slower than those of Ariane 5. To make this software run fast enough (on Ariane 4), a vital check had been disabled. That check would have prevented a parameter from suddenly switching from a large positive value to a large negative value. But the check remained omitted when the software was used in the Ariane 5. It turns out that the parameter made that sudden switch from positive to negative just a few seconds before a different (bug-free) piece of software would have taken over control. It caused the rocket to veer off course unrecoverably (and so the rocket had to be destroyed, to protect the nearby city). Sometimes you can hear the very grindstones of fate clashing.
First off, if you are parked at an orbit rocket launch and that launch malfunctioned, setting off your car alarm, you definitely parked entirely way too damn close, and you're probably even closer and have a new darkness skin tint now.
I'm retired Navy and was a misile technician. The closest incident to this I remember was when someone dropped a rocket that they were assembling to load into a rocket launching pod on a helicopter. It scraped on the non-skid surface of the flight deck and sparked igniting the engine! (They mishandled it be tossing it to the person loading the rocket pod.) Fortunately it corkscrewed off the deck and didn't hit anything!
While those prototype SpaceX starship explosions look impressive, consider that each one has only 3 methane/oxygen Raptor engines, and not that much fuel on board - only enough for liftoff, a few minutes of hovering and then landing back where it started. The full scale version will have 30 of the same engines and enough fuel on board to launch into orbit. So if the same kind of malfunction happened with one of those, the explosion could be at least 10 times as big.
@18:29 "Ow, Right now!!" You seem to like to include static fire tests...which are not rocket launches. Most of them Space X. Glad they could give you so much content.
At 12:15.. The cruise missile "went off course" That thing had no course whatsoever to begin with!! Thats the kind of footage that sends chills down the spines of our adversaries..
Launching a Harpoon from a FFG ship MK 13 launcher is MUCH different than a Standard Missile. A Standard Missile goes whoosh! off the launcher. A Harpoon goes rumble rumble rumble and when you’re just about to hit the DUD JET button for a misfiring bird, it finally goes whoosh!
The Chinese fireworks at 5:33 are also quite impressive. At 6:07, note the time delay between the rocket hitting the ground and the sound of the explosion reaching the camera. Physics in real life, that's for sure. I am glad that no one got hurt.
Sometimes the sound is correct, a lot of times it seems wrong. The times it sounds correct is when the big boom is heard delayed by the distance the sound must travel. For instance, launces from Boca Cika Texas when observers and their cameras were six sound seconds away, that is still very close.
Very poor editing but most won't even notice they are still asleep. It's all fake since the Ruskies claimed yes "Claimed" they put sputnik into orbit, yet another load of garbage!
So what's your story Annie? Flerfer too? Please elaborate on your theory of everything? How old are you? Have you always believed space is fake, or just since you found other flakes online?
My most recent question is not rhetorical, I'm really hoping for a reply and maybe some further discussion. Yes plz! State your beliefs, make me a believer. I can exchange ideas without being snarky about it, if you prefer. Hope to hear from you Ann Lyon?
You would think that anyone in the space industry would know that the space shuttle is about as good as they will get for at least another 5 decades. It is more advanced and better designed than rockets that keeps blowing up.
Remember no machinery is 100% safe or will work all the time and this ia why we humans are taking a big chance with our life every time we use or get inside of one! 😮
@@phillipdavidhaskett7513 I was referring to Starship, not the Dragon capsule. And, no, it is not a rescue mission. This was a planned mission that was modified by removing two people who were supposed to go up to the ISS.
@@MrGrumblier Modifying a pre-planned mission to permit recovery of stranded astronauts magically transmogrifies it into a rescue mission, in pretty much anyone's book.
@@phillipdavidhaskett7513 No, a rescue mission would be one that has it's primary mission to rescue the stranded astronauts. Making accommodations to be able to fit the extra bodies upon return is not a rescue mission.
@@MrGrumblier Whatever. The astronauts stranded by the failed Starliner have been rescued by a passing Dragon spacecraft, that had the foresight to make room for them before it left earth. Is that bending the language enough for you?
16:25 Oh No... LoL Now I'm no rocket scientist, but asking a rocket to land straight down like that must be the most difficult thing you could ask it to do, I'm thinking some kind of transformer thing going on for easier landings, even if something was launched to attach itself to the rocket for landing purposes
Now imagine threatening a guy, that has a hole bunch of these 5 story high tubes, filled with methane and shit... and that can pretty much be made to fall onto a dime , anywhere in this solar system...
Oh man we actually had a massive argument over the word anomaly in WA DC at Andrews AFB. One tech rep used the word to describe a workers occurrence. Another rep and several senior personnel said he made the word up. I knew better with my small town high school education and massive reading from the time I was in 3rd grade. I let the re know I was with him but it was way out of my pay grade. Lol
In contrast to the accompanyxing commentary, the 2nd rocket supposedly wasn't powered by LOX/LH fuel, but by UDMH/NTO instead. See those brown fumes coming out!
I'm an ex Royal Navy missile aimer. In the 70s we fired a sea slug missile (33ft long) during a test, and it went about a mile then into the sea. After about 30 seconds it came back out of the sea and towards the ship. That was a code brown moment!
I’ll bet every “Jack” needed a clean pair of underwear and a very, very large “wet” to accompany the McVities Digestives in such a situation. Normally a decent “wet” of Yorkshire tea would suffice but when a situation is beyond “brown trousers” and a cup of tea moment, there’s just nothing to beat a McVities Digestive bickie, unless its the chocolate covered version or the extra crumbly variety.
Never let it be said that the British space agency doesn’t have emergency contingencies already in place which covers any and every possible eventuality. There’s simply nothing that can beat a good cup of tea and either a Rich Tea Biscuit, a nice Digestive, or it’s really serious you breakout the Chocolate Digestives or for a totally SNAFU of world ending proportions then it’s time for the Jaffa Cakes.
I was on a destroyer that did the R&D for the Tomahawk in 80 and 81...they used to fall into the drink pretty regular, but at least the didn't blow up.
I was hoping for a code brown video compilation here. Very disappointing.
US Navy here, on an Adams class DDG. The Tartar missile, as explained to me, had a primary heat seaker guidance, then a radar guidance, and when they failed, it switched over to Magnetic Anomaly Detection. So, here we are floating around on a huge slab of iron and aluminum. It was almost routine for those missiles to go out three or four miles, then loop around to come back at us. And, it was also routine for our gunners to blow it out of the sky. I was actually on deck to witness three such incidents, in 2 1/2 years aboard.
We had that at the Aberporth Range.... Guns hit the destruct button like Thor lol.
Gotta stop buying these rockets from Temu.
And from Amazon
@@jamesstead2256 BO?
and Boeing
China - playing Falling Booster on Village bingo
all the time. Not any good either
except these are not supposed to go bang but sometimes do, and the Temu ones are supposed to bang yet don't.
I loved watching the Star-ship testing, at the time I called it a grain tower with a rocket engine.
yea, these things are like fcking skyscrapers taking flight. it's just awe inspiring
Buck Rogers (the 1930's version) would be proud.
the beeps were " oooooohh shit" LOL
oh man I absolutely love that sound. @25:28 INCREDIBLE
Rocket Science, like life, is a series of learning by your mistakes, and improving.
*These videos never fail to cheer me up. Thanks for sharing*
Sometimes it seems to me like very expensive fireworks.
Well, I don't know. I have never seen fireworks getting scientific equipment into orbit.
@@21stcenturyscots And apparently when they fly in circles or explode like the Challenger they don't really accomplish objectives.
I just commented that lol didn't see this
@@GetMoGaming No need to see everything first. Sometimes it is nice to know others share a sensibility ;-) Most people don't share mine because I don't believe in being politically correct. Everything doesn't have to be t-ball for adults.
@@thebookdoc.writing.and.editing "Great minds think alike" lol. Yeh I just think readers may think I'm copying, like I've thought before when I've seen two comments the same. (I always overthink) Just be yourself, I think is the moral. :)
All those people who travel long distances and endure weather and crowds and bad food, so they can then watch a LIVE space launch on the 8 inch screen of their phone. Bizarre.
🤣😂🤣😂
yep, that's so stupid, I will never understand it. At least you hear the sound! but there are even dumber people, that stand in front of their phone to take a selfie!
@@Ezekiel903 They do WHAT???
@@markrainford1219 they take a selfie of themselves exactly when the rocket lifts up. They make several attempt to have their beloved picture, missing the most interesting scenes. sounds incredible I know, a girlfriend traveled to the US for that, most pictures were from her in front of rockets in the museum, and then at the start.
Success, in such complicated business, will never be separated from mistakes. Mistakes, in some prospective, have useful value.
The first Chinese rocket escaped the launch pad, it wasn't supposed to leave the pad. 🤔🤨
Failed bolt. Couldn't handle the thrust of the rocket. Fair enough.
@@WeirdGuyOnTheInternet Right, but if China quit trying to copy us, then maybe they will produce a decent system.
@@WeirdGuyOnTheInternet Hey, there's this old aerospace f_o-r_u-m I hang out at. Interested? If so I'll have to be very creative in getting the name to you. YT admins bots don't like that, and are very good at thwarting my attempts to others in the past.
@@WeirdGuyOnTheInternet The place I speak of is slowly dying, so I occasionally make recruiting attempts. It's not a cult or anything, but you might get mildly addicted to it, or not.
I told them bungee cords wouldn't hold.
It's amazing how these catastrophic failures started with something so small.
Im glad you find our faulures so entertaining.
Learn to spell...
I find your spelling entertaining...
I make no claim to the english language, yawl.
*How far away do you think that Proton M rocket explodes* @3:08?
You can calculate the exact distance to the explosion from the sound delay - sound travels at (approx) 343 m/s at sea level and the delay is roughly 10.5 seconds, so 323 x 10.5 = 3601.5 m, which equates to 2.23 miles. It's about 2.23 miles away from the camera. Did you guess right? I didn't.
2:07 suddenly fear went through my body... it turned right into a balistic missile
FYI, SpaceX does not have crashes nor explosions: SpaceX has Rapid Unscheduled Disassemblies (RUDs).
Oh no, they definitely have crashes and explosions, but they are a little more tolerant of them, since they're testing the hardware till it breaks.
That’s some very expensive mistakes. The concussive shockwaves are really cool though, in some instances you can actually see the shockwave and hear it 10-20 seconds later.
That's because light travels faster than sound.
@@jacklow9611 no shit
@@jacklow9611 Wow!!! Thanx! 😜
the Chinese, sorry CCP are a evil regime, all other have their start pad far away from homes, cities etc. the CCP start ramp are near a city and have not even a self detonating device installed in case of mishaps
@@Three_Random_Words : You're welcome.
15:45 I'll try to keep this brief, but geek-out alert. The rocket is steered by 'gimballing' the engines (making them swivel a little bit to change the angle of the exhaust). There is a piece of software which controls those gimbals, and that software needs to react very fast, so as to make adjustments fast enough to keep the rocket stable. For the Ariane 5, they just used the same piece of software as for the Ariane 4. Ariane 4's processors were much slower than those of Ariane 5. To make this software run fast enough (on Ariane 4), a vital check had been disabled. That check would have prevented a parameter from suddenly switching from a large positive value to a large negative value. But the check remained omitted when the software was used in the Ariane 5. It turns out that the parameter made that sudden switch from positive to negative just a few seconds before a different (bug-free) piece of software would have taken over control. It caused the rocket to veer off course unrecoverably (and so the rocket had to be destroyed, to protect the nearby city). Sometimes you can hear the very grindstones of fate clashing.
They blowed real good !
Dude, I think you just like seeing anything blow up or explode!!!!!!!
lmao that thumbnail was so fake i knew it obviously since no starship every bellyflopped near a chinatown lmao but i stil came to watch anyway
Nice fireworks😂
First off, if you are parked at an orbit rocket launch and that launch malfunctioned, setting off your car alarm, you definitely parked entirely way too damn close, and you're probably even closer and have a new darkness skin tint now.
While the Proton's 4th stage does use LOX/RP-1(kerosene), the majority of the fuel is N2O4/UDMH.
Good old fashioned hypergolic poisonous corrosive cancer in a bottle.
I'm retired Navy and was a misile technician. The closest incident to this I remember was when someone dropped a rocket that they were assembling to load into a rocket launching pod on a helicopter. It scraped on the non-skid surface of the flight deck and sparked igniting the engine! (They mishandled it be tossing it to the person loading the rocket pod.) Fortunately it corkscrewed off the deck and didn't hit anything!
2:30 The moment the cameraman realizes his car is parked over there.
While those prototype SpaceX starship explosions look impressive, consider that each one has only 3 methane/oxygen Raptor engines, and not that much fuel on board - only enough for liftoff, a few minutes of hovering and then landing back where it started. The full scale version will have 30 of the same engines and enough fuel on board to launch into orbit. So if the same kind of malfunction happened with one of those, the explosion could be at least 10 times as big.
Ok four things, 1 back to the drawing board, 2,that's going to leave a bruise, 3 more power Scotty.😂 4 not my fault.
Oh! Expensive fireworks!
As a retired Navy Chief Petty Officer, the shipborne missile launch is the scariest!
@18:29 "Ow, Right now!!" You seem to like to include static fire tests...which are not rocket launches. Most of them Space X. Glad they could give you so much content.
except that chinese one, it was a static fire test and a rocket launch
They some expensive fireworks
It’s called iterative learning folks. Just gotta make sure that failures are controlled so that people aren’t harmed
A little bit of Lightening and the Kiwis run like little girls protecting their computers
At 12:15.. The cruise missile "went off course" That thing had no course whatsoever to begin with!!
Thats the kind of footage that sends chills down the spines of our adversaries..
Gotta put those car horn alarms in just to add a bit more authenticity.
When Humans find an alternative way to power their vehicles (instead of relying on explosions) things will be better.
Nice video!!
Starship 15 was the last Prototype to fly and it landed with no issue's.
It didn't mark the end of the Starship test program.The test program ended with a successful landing.
And now orbital tests are taking place.
And wasnt even the second last one cuz in between we had a landing but an explosion 8 min after
Proton M uses hypergolic fuel, hence the BIG explosion
Just wondering if the same childish and patronising intonation is applied in conversation with family members.
That unintended Chinese launch was from a launch site ridiculously close to a city - crashing just a few kms away which is crazy.
Launching a Harpoon from a FFG ship MK 13 launcher is MUCH different than a Standard Missile. A Standard Missile goes whoosh! off the launcher. A Harpoon goes rumble rumble rumble and when you’re just about to hit the DUD JET button for a misfiring bird, it finally goes whoosh!
~ 4 min into this vid and the background music + ppl talking + this dude narrating, so pleasing, an absolute delight for ears
k bye
No warhead needed: Just fill it with rocket fuel. When will we see a bungee assist launch?
That one might’ve ended failure, but SpaceX is the only thing going. Where is NASA?
Take a look at the Space Launch System.
American fireworks are the most beautiful 👍
The Chinese fireworks at 5:33 are also quite impressive. At 6:07, note the time delay between the rocket hitting the ground and the sound of the explosion reaching the camera. Physics in real life, that's for sure. I am glad that no one got hurt.
Ways to never get an FAA launch license again....
Every one of these explosions increased the Global Temp !
Ask putler as well
Not a bit. Not even a smidgen.
😮😮😮😮😮😮😊😊😊😊😊😊 from Malaysia 🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾
Sometimes the sound is correct, a lot of times it seems wrong. The times it sounds correct is when the big boom is heard delayed by the distance the sound must travel. For instance, launces from Boca Cika Texas when observers and their cameras were six sound seconds away, that is still very close.
Very poor editing but most won't even notice they are still asleep. It's all fake since the Ruskies claimed yes "Claimed" they put sputnik into orbit, yet another load of garbage!
Great video, but how didn't it start of with the V2 and why isn't the Challenger in it?
To many space x test's , they are called tests for a reason nothing goes horribly wrong.
They will never get passed the Firmament !
Lol is this a joke? I bet it's not. I bet you're serious. And I'm seriously not surprised....
@@kindlin 'Firmament' means they've been toking on some jesus most of their life.
So what's your story Annie? Flerfer too? Please elaborate on your theory of everything? How old are you? Have you always believed space is fake, or just since you found other flakes online?
My most recent question is not rhetorical, I'm really hoping for a reply and maybe some further discussion. Yes plz! State your beliefs, make me a believer. I can exchange ideas without being snarky about it, if you prefer. Hope to hear from you Ann Lyon?
Can I help deprogram you? Cults are a horrible thing. Are you a JW by any chance?
You would think that anyone in the space industry would know that the space shuttle is about as good as they will get for at least another 5 decades. It is more advanced and better designed than rockets that keeps blowing up.
Heptyl is used on the Proton. It is a very toxic fuel. Now it is planned to use Angara instead of Proton.
Expensive Fireworks🤣🤣
OOPPSSIIEE DAISY!!!
There's no such thing as a computer error. They do exactly what they're programmed to do.
More struts !!
Very good video, just one think, ajust the background sound lower when you speak. Good work
Space X...stands for extra explosive.
Experience accumulated 👍 😊
Bring back the space shuttle.
Very good for the planet and the wallet
Space X must be buying their engines from Wish, they always seem to malfunction.
OK, why are they trying to land vertically on a ship? Can the rocket be designed land sideways?
It was NOT destroyed by Range Safety, or it would have been destroyed in the AIR, not when it hit the ground.
Now do the one-way Boeing Starliner
Remember no machinery is 100% safe or will work all the time and this ia why we humans are taking a big chance with our life every time we use or get inside of one! 😮
You ignored the N1 and the most disastrous Challenger....why?
Out of respect for the 7 astronauts that were killed I suppose. You've seen it before, you know what happened.
8:36 Yes, just needs a coat of paint, and some more safety rails!!! 😆
противоречишь сам себе ,ты хоть следи чего мелишь !!!
Would be better if you let the actual delayed boom be heard instead of trying to do the instant replace sound. Humans now a days….
The Proton M stuff is nonsense. It mostly uses dinitrogen tetroxide as the oxidizer, and unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine as fuel.
Technically Unshedueled Rapid Disassembly...T.U.R.D.
The joke might have landed if you didn't misspell unscheduled.
quit harping on people for their spelling, this isn't the f*cking spelling bee
@@jnawk83 no one cares, typos happen with keyboards. Not a space or Spacex fanboy I guess.
You learn more from failure than success. Elon has been learning a lot lately.
Didn't he just launch a rescue mission to the ISS to recover astronauts stranded by Boeing's Starliner?
@@phillipdavidhaskett7513 I was referring to Starship, not the Dragon capsule. And, no, it is not a rescue mission. This was a planned mission that was modified by removing two people who were supposed to go up to the ISS.
@@MrGrumblier Modifying a pre-planned mission to permit recovery of stranded astronauts magically transmogrifies it into a rescue mission, in pretty much anyone's book.
@@phillipdavidhaskett7513 No, a rescue mission would be one that has it's primary mission to rescue the stranded astronauts. Making accommodations to be able to fit the extra bodies upon return is not a rescue mission.
@@MrGrumblier Whatever. The astronauts stranded by the failed Starliner have been rescued by a passing Dragon spacecraft, that had the foresight to make room for them before it left earth. Is that bending the language enough for you?
Too much Pollution !!!
ahh yes, the DEI rocketry programs.😄
16:25 Oh No... LoL Now I'm no rocket scientist, but asking a rocket to land straight down like that must be the most difficult thing you could ask it to do, I'm thinking some kind of transformer thing going on for easier landings, even if something was launched to attach itself to the rocket for landing purposes
You have to ask yourself how does Elon M. have this much money to waste on rockets 😳
Why do you think that you have such high prices?
War! Aliens! Armageddon! Nah. Just Elon Musk playing with his toys...
Why include Starship ... it's at the moment a test vehicle & Musk expected the first 5. 6 or 10 to crash or blow up
18:08 That must have been a fireworks show from India, or they found it on the side of the road and repaired it LOL!!!!!
25:54 omg look at those guys going inside the car 😂 I can't believe it, what if real icpm explode
Just been thinking of how many successful launches North Korea has made and how many disastrous launches we seen here… Should we be worried?
so a Falcon 9 launch is cheaper than a Trident rocket....... who would have thought
Now imagine threatening a guy, that has a hole bunch of these 5 story high tubes, filled with methane and shit... and that can pretty much be made to fall onto a dime , anywhere in this solar system...
At 10:16 that falcon 9 explosion was very very similar to the space shuttle tragedy in 1986
I'd probably only heard the word 'anomaly ' once or twice in my sixty years. Until recently.
Oh man we actually had a massive argument over the word anomaly in WA DC at Andrews AFB. One tech rep used the word to describe a workers occurrence. Another rep and several senior personnel said he made the word up. I knew better with my small town high school education and massive reading from the time I was in 3rd grade. I let the re know I was with him but it was way out of my pay grade. Lol
This is why paraffin rocket fuel may take over soon, if it continues working well.
🚀🚀🚀
youtube knows me too well..
No replays. We can do that locally.
I muted the audio for a specific reason...
Dude should stick to narrating storybooks to kindergarten classes.
In contrast to the accompanyxing commentary, the 2nd rocket supposedly wasn't powered by LOX/LH fuel, but by UDMH/NTO instead. See those brown fumes coming out!
China loves that stuff, so much so they like to play Falling-Booster-Village-Bingo with it.
People wonder why we have ozone layer problems
05:39....Made In China......'nuff said
HEY
12:18 was kinda fun to watch.