COMMENT POLICY: Thanks for watching 👍 Please keep comments on topic and value-add. Comments, where it is obvious the person did not watch the video, will be deleted. Comments that display inappropriate behavior (such as nastiness, belligerence, stupidity, trolling, etc.) will be removed and the commenter will be permanently banned from the channel. No self-promotion/advertising.
Well November 9, 2024 is here so this concludes your Beatles research. Been watching your channel since 2016 and your videos helped fill in the many questions I had on this band and the official narrative never making sense to me. I think you've gotten closer to the truth than anybody, thanks for everything!!
Thanks for all you have done Mike! Will miss your research. But what you have contributed is immeasurable. Look forward to hearing you on random interviews going forward!
Billy has been playing Paul for much longer than Paul was Paul. I used to say that to people who objected to the conspiracy. They were so used to seeing this Paul that the original was easy to forget. I also figured that was behind The Memoirs of Billy Shears - he wanted some kind of credit for the enormous job he had done with Paul for so many years. I also figured his marriage to Heather was fake, a cover for leaving a portion of his estate to his daughter, who he wrote the song "Heather" about. He probably couldn't leave McCartney's estate to her, but he could fake a marriage, without a pre-nup, and let her take a chunk of his fortune.
Hi Mike, I was lucky thar my sweet aunt bought tickets to see t h e Beatles at Busch stadium in St Louis MO, in August of 1965. I couldn't hear a word they sang because of the screaming, but I'll never forget that I was there❤. Also, I remember the news on the night of the Monkees
I appreciate your work Mike. It cleared my mind about the Beatles and especially "McCartney" who's cd's I bought. You cleared out what was in a slumber in our minds about them being not that great musicians and how they accomplished in such a time span such great work?....
John Lennon and George Harrison in particular were the ones who tried to distance themself from this plot. John Lennon was about to spill the whole can of beans and was killed by CIAs "Operation 40" gang. George was most likely not into the twisted belief system of the "Elite".
Mike I think with AI they ll be able to change original Paul’s face in his old films soon , stretch the chin out etc. Which is sick if they do , but I’ve got a tea coaster at home with the picture of the lads running down the street all laughing its from v early sixties 61/62 and they’ve even added a long chin on that ! It’s sick
I remember the Italian thing. There used to be a great Italian conspiracy website about it that I was following at the time. I lost track of the site, but it could still be there.
Yeah, the DNA and the fingerprint stories were on the Italian website long ago, as well as a lot of photographic analysis, face comparisons, and voice comparisons too, as I recall. A lot of wonky stuff.
In the multiple Paul pictures. #1 has an indentation(north/south) in his chin that does not exist in any other photo. My dad had that dent in his chin. It never disappeared.
I think the McCartney switch is just the tip of the iceberg when it come to these things in the 'entertainment' business. Was the murdered John the original? Is Mick still Mick and Keef still Keef? Is Page still Page?
It's funny that people are so attached to the myths. You should do a study of what a pasting the Monkees took for blowing the whistle on the whole fake music industry at the time. I mean, I got in an argument with another five-year-old boy at the time about it. I didn't care who wrote or performed the music, my judgement was only about the sound. We both liked The Beatles, but when I said I liked the Monkees as well, he dismissed them as fake. What difference did it make (especially to a five-year-old boy. I was only talking about the sound. But at the time, according to his values, which were the values the system was creating or catering to, the artist had to white and perform his own music to be taken seriously. He was already drinking the cool-aid, and probably with the majority of people who refuse to accept that The Beatles weren't writing and recording their own music. He might have been imitating his older brothers and sisters, but the controversy must have been in the popular culture at the time. The Monkees blew the whistle, and other bands and performers who knew very well about the Wrecking Crew were fast to distance themselves from the Monkees. The story, except for the Monkees, was buried again. There's a study of propaganda there.
The Monkeys had Neil Diamond and Carole King writing songs for them too (before their subsequent successful solo careers). I'm afraid Mike is right on his bold Beatles NOT songwriting (like we were told) theory one. There's something being left out of the official story. I think it's a great challenge to the official narrative that he presents
Billy Shears is Billy. Not Ringo. I don't have the time or patience for individuals who can't overcome their intellectual obstacles. Go hang out here: www.youtube.com/@TheBeatles
hey mike i seen a newpaper clip looks like from oct 1969 from rat subterranean news saying its high time our billy received the credit he deserves--? i tryed to send you a photo of it but it didnt work also did the beatles make alot of money with ludwig name on ringoes drum set thanks
That article is written by a man named Lee Merrick of whom there exist no records. (No relation to the omen actress lee remick). He claims that Billy shears is the replacement Paul's birth name, and that Billy's father was named Phillip shears and that Phillip granted the journalist an interview where he admitted his son had replaced Paul McCartney. There is no record of a Phillip shears who fits the possible role of father of the man playing Paul McCartney today (there was a Phillip James shears, a British army officer, but he was born in 1887 which means he would have been in his 50s when "Billy shears" was born , and 82 at the time of the supposed interview. The article reads like an early and quaint example of what today we'd call "click bait". Having said that, Phillip James shears did have a daughter called "Pauline Mary Beatrice shears' which, aside from shears itself, incorporates three other interesting names- (Paul, Paul's mother's name Mary, and Beatrice which is redolent of "beatles"). And Pauline shears' own story is interesting, she married a scottish clan chief who was also an Olympic rower.
Me and my friends and people I have known for 50 years of my life Who was into the rave days and on the juke box was Bowie pink Floyd van Morrison and Dylan and so many more from old and new And very rarely met any Beatles fans The were not a good band and thats not just my opinion but what I have seen over my 50 years on this planet
COMMENT POLICY: Thanks for watching 👍 Please keep comments on topic and value-add. Comments, where it is obvious the person did not watch the video, will be deleted. Comments that display inappropriate behavior (such as nastiness, belligerence, stupidity, trolling, etc.) will be removed and the commenter will be permanently banned from the channel. No self-promotion/advertising.
Why not look at more groups.
I am sure more are Elite controlled.
Well November 9, 2024 is here so this concludes your Beatles research. Been watching your channel since 2016 and your videos helped fill in the many questions I had on this band and the official narrative never making sense to me. I think you've gotten closer to the truth than anybody, thanks for everything!!
Thank you for your support.
Sage of Quay Mania? 😅
Best Beatles research presenter, I know Billy is a subscriber.. he has to be
Oh yeah, hi 👋🏻 Mister Shear’s ie Phaul 😝
You’re the best Mikey. Love from England. 🇬🇧
Thanks for all you have done Mike! Will miss your research. But what you have contributed is immeasurable. Look forward to hearing you on random interviews going forward!
Thank you for your support!
Congratulations Mike. Thank you for 100s of hours of entertainment and critical thinking!!!
Well earned retirement awaits you!!!
Billy has been playing Paul for much longer than Paul was Paul.
I used to say that to people who objected to the conspiracy.
They were so used to seeing this Paul that the original was easy to forget.
I also figured that was behind The Memoirs of Billy Shears - he wanted some kind of credit for the enormous job he had done with Paul for so many years.
I also figured his marriage to Heather was fake, a cover for leaving a portion of his estate to his daughter, who he wrote the song "Heather" about.
He probably couldn't leave McCartney's estate to her, but he could fake a marriage, without a pre-nup, and let her take a chunk of his fortune.
Thanks Mike-your research has been amazing!
Thanks for all your work Mike! Kind regards, Paul
My pleasure!
Thanks Mike!
Hi Mike, I was lucky thar my sweet aunt bought tickets to see t h e Beatles at Busch stadium in St Louis MO, in August of 1965. I couldn't hear a word they sang because of the screaming, but I'll never forget that I was there❤. Also, I remember the news on the night of the Monkees
Premiere that a Beatle was in a car accident.
I appreciate your work Mike. It cleared my mind about the Beatles and especially "McCartney" who's cd's I bought. You cleared out what was in a slumber in our minds about them being not that great musicians and how they accomplished in such a time span such great work?....
*whose CDs
Dont go Mike, stick around for a few interviews more 👍
any intelligent, open-minded person can no longer deny it.
Mike's work is entertainingly exhaustive and unassailable...
To me it also seems odd that the two Beatles who started spilling the beans died? John and George.
Surely both of those deaths were due to faustian deals.
John Lennon and George Harrison in particular were the ones who tried to distance themself from this plot. John Lennon was about to spill the whole can of beans and was killed by CIAs "Operation 40" gang. George was most likely not into the twisted belief system of the "Elite".
Most Excellent! Thanks.very much!
Great Job you done & are doing Mate 👍🏿 - Thanks Mike !
Thanks 👍
Thanks, Mike!! It was and still is fun and mind expanding to dive into your research...
Hugs from an Argentinian musician!
God bless you, Mike Williams!
xoxo The Clarences
Really enjoyed (and learned from) your research. Thanks, Mike
Glad you enjoyed it!
Mike I think with AI they ll be able to change original Paul’s face in his old films soon , stretch the chin out etc. Which is sick if they do , but I’ve got a tea coaster at home with the picture of the lads running down the street all laughing its from v early sixties 61/62 and they’ve even added a long chin on that ! It’s sick
I remember the Italian thing.
There used to be a great Italian conspiracy website about it that I was following at the time.
I lost track of the site, but it could still be there.
Yeah, the DNA and the fingerprint stories were on the Italian website long ago, as well as a lot of photographic analysis, face comparisons, and voice comparisons too, as I recall.
A lot of wonky stuff.
Mike, best wishes for you. Enjoy your free time. I've been able to finally convince my husband that this guy is not Paul McCartney.
It ain't easy!
😂@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel
In the multiple Paul pictures. #1 has an indentation(north/south) in his chin that does not exist in any other photo. My dad had that dent in his chin. It never disappeared.
I think the McCartney switch is just the tip of the iceberg when it come to these things in the 'entertainment' business. Was the murdered John the original? Is Mick still Mick and Keef still Keef? Is Page still Page?
three johns at least
Well, according to public records, John Winston Lennon is still alive.👀
Get well soon Mike!
It's funny that people are so attached to the myths.
You should do a study of what a pasting the Monkees took for blowing the whistle on the whole fake music industry at the time.
I mean, I got in an argument with another five-year-old boy at the time about it.
I didn't care who wrote or performed the music, my judgement was only about the sound.
We both liked The Beatles, but when I said I liked the Monkees as well, he dismissed them as fake.
What difference did it make (especially to a five-year-old boy. I was only talking about the sound.
But at the time, according to his values, which were the values the system was creating or catering to, the artist had to white and perform his own music to be taken seriously.
He was already drinking the cool-aid, and probably with the majority of people who refuse to accept that The Beatles weren't writing and recording their own music.
He might have been imitating his older brothers and sisters, but the controversy must have been in the popular culture at the time.
The Monkees blew the whistle, and other bands and performers who knew very well about the Wrecking Crew were fast to distance themselves from the Monkees.
The story, except for the Monkees, was buried again.
There's a study of propaganda there.
The Monkeys had Neil Diamond and Carole King writing songs for them too (before their subsequent successful solo careers). I'm afraid Mike is right on his bold Beatles NOT songwriting (like we were told) theory one. There's something being left out of the official story. I think it's a great challenge to the official narrative that he presents
And again, just listen - Billy Shears is introduced on Pepper as Ringo, then he sings “With a Little Help…” and much later on his own Ringo Lp.
Billy Shears is Billy. Not Ringo. I don't have the time or patience for individuals who can't overcome their intellectual obstacles. Go hang out here: www.youtube.com/@TheBeatles
hey mike i seen a newpaper clip looks like from oct 1969 from rat subterranean news saying its high time our billy received the credit he deserves--? i tryed to send you a photo of it but it didnt work also did the beatles make alot of money with ludwig name on ringoes drum set thanks
Ludwig, Rickenbacker, Gretsch... There had to be a ton of sales generated for those companies.
That article is written by a man named Lee Merrick of whom there exist no records. (No relation to the omen actress lee remick). He claims that Billy shears is the replacement Paul's birth name, and that Billy's father was named Phillip shears and that Phillip granted the journalist an interview where he admitted his son had replaced Paul McCartney. There is no record of a Phillip shears who fits the possible role of father of the man playing Paul McCartney today (there was a Phillip James shears, a British army officer, but he was born in 1887 which means he would have been in his 50s when "Billy shears" was born , and 82 at the time of the supposed interview. The article reads like an early and quaint example of what today we'd call "click bait".
Having said that, Phillip James shears did have a daughter called "Pauline Mary Beatrice shears' which, aside from shears itself, incorporates three other interesting names- (Paul, Paul's mother's name Mary, and Beatrice which is redolent of "beatles"). And Pauline shears' own story is interesting, she married a scottish clan chief who was also an Olympic rower.
The music mafia has great control
Me and my friends and people I have known for 50 years of my life Who was into the rave days and on the juke box was Bowie pink Floyd van Morrison and Dylan and so many more from old and new And very rarely met any Beatles fans The were not a good band and thats not just my opinion but what I have seen over my 50 years on this planet
How do I email you Mike have some info you'd def be into .
Christ knows who's on the cover of Beatles for Sale. "George" and "Paul" look completely wrong..
what about Midas Man...
... and the shot-voice syndrome (sotto voce?)
I think the condom was leaving the Bambi Kino - let me ask Pete
Both eyes move wouldnt one be immobile
How Does A Prosthetic Eye Move? An Ocularist Answers Your Questions tinyurl.com/yvytsyhu
@@JamesBurchell-r5p no he went over that in the video part 3
Mike strange that both the Beatles and The Rolling Stones are nominated for Grammys ...can we say damage control.Too obvious.