New Genestealer Cults Rules: Crossfire for 10th edition 40k

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 36

  • @thunderwarrior2459
    @thunderwarrior2459 22 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +17

    I can’t wait to not know what these do ….

  • @Spigele
    @Spigele 15 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    This is so cool, i originally wanted alpha legion, but then committed hard to gsc and ravenguard. This kinda gives me the best of what i wanted

  • @mistformsquirrel
    @mistformsquirrel 22 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +12

    Stupid question time - is this just for Crusade? or is this for regular play too? I feel like it was ambiguous from the video? >< But I am also kinda dumb.

    • @tylerchadwell1267
      @tylerchadwell1267 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +10

      It's both, and you're fine for asking questions. this crap gets confusing.

    • @mistformsquirrel
      @mistformsquirrel 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      @tylerchadwell1267 Oh cool! And thank you, yeah >

    • @scarletsurge5624
      @scarletsurge5624 19 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Does it replace something we already have? Or is it just an add-on to the army?

    • @tylerchadwell1267
      @tylerchadwell1267 19 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +5

      @scarletsurge5624 just an add-on. You can choose to not use it, but there's no reason not to. If you plan on using it in a tournament, I'd recommended contacting the TOs see confirm that they'd be okay with it, but it is fully legal

    • @lucastb1775
      @lucastb1775 18 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +3

      I'm afraid even in the White Dwarf it is only listed as crusade rules. They are not for matched play.

  • @scarletimpaler7919
    @scarletimpaler7919 22 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +6

    You'll get caught up in the CROSSFIRE!

    • @TheLongVigil
      @TheLongVigil 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +3

      I am so glad someone else is old enough to remember this commercial, lol.

    • @Foxymophandlemama69
      @Foxymophandlemama69 17 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Isn’t this from WoW?

    • @scarletimpaler7919
      @scarletimpaler7919 13 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      @@TheLongVigil You COULDN'T escape this commercial back then.

  • @ThroatSore
    @ThroatSore 19 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +2

    I was just thinking that gsc need more rules.

  • @MetPhD
    @MetPhD 20 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    I might want to actually play my GSC now 🎉

  • @GeneralJerrard101
    @GeneralJerrard101 12 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    I gotta get this issue off white dwarf so I can find out if this is crusade exclusive or not. If it is crusade exclusive, then are all the other armies getting extra rules in white dwarf for crusade only so I can give them to my space marine opponents?

  • @13Bbeards
    @13Bbeards 20 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Man, those rules would be so much better if they were replacing what we currently had.

  • @manuelf9045
    @manuelf9045 22 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +2

    Is this tournament legal?

    • @goldenruhl246
      @goldenruhl246 22 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +3

      Generally, white dwarf rules are casual games only.

    • @Bluecho4
      @Bluecho4 18 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      You'll need to contact the organizers for the tournament in question. Because from the video, it looks like different tournaments set their own standards for what they'll accept and what they won't.

    • @slayerplayzroblox
      @slayerplayzroblox 11 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      I can't imagine that it is tournament legal. It is too much of a buff to simply add into the army without massive hits elsewhere. I wouldn't be terribly surprised if this were the new detachment rule, but then again why would they put it in White Dwarf?

  • @insert-cony8379
    @insert-cony8379 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +2

    aaaahh.... yes... squirming advance. It looks quite similar to the old "Return to the shadows". that stratagem so useful, mythical and characteristic of a "guerrilla" army. We no longer have that, we cannot leave any unit at the end of the enemy movement phase. but curiously Orks, Mechanicus, Astra, Tau and countless armies have such a stratagem in some of their detachments! who wrote the codex; GSC?? someone who was in a hurry, or someone who was just passing the time at work. I know who did NOT write the Codex gsc. It was not written by someone who had a minimum of respect for the lore or the essence of the army.

    • @trystongilbert1837
      @trystongilbert1837 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Someone who plays AGAINST GSC but never AS them. That's my pet theory.

    • @Corvus111
      @Corvus111 20 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Wholeheartedly aggree.
      I only played a couple games with the codex this edition. Every now and again I have a look through the book because I get the urge to field my cult. Some of the best and funniest games I ever had were with that army (before 10th). But as soon as I get to those silly rules like Neophytes getting sticky objectives while acolythes get the CP generation while chilling on an objective.. or stuff like the once per game ability of the Benefictus where they get to push their 5++ up to a whopping 4++ FOR THAT MODEL ONLY, coupled with detachments that often favor only a small handful of units of our already very small unit roster ... I immediately lose interest again.
      This book honestly feels so .. wrong, so many things don't make any sense. I am really looking forward to our next book, maybe then I will have more fun with that army again.

    • @insert-cony8379
      @insert-cony8379 20 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      @ same feelings with our stratagems and abilities. Only benefits a small part of our rooster. Is a shame

  • @nosbigdamus9665
    @nosbigdamus9665 19 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Good Good BUT will these be changed within the month after they see how good they are. Lol

  • @Booley95
    @Booley95 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Is it me or are these fairly complicated? 😅

    • @Vante21
      @Vante21 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

      GSC? Complicated?? NEVER!!

    • @lionusoctavus6444
      @lionusoctavus6444 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +2

      The I don't want to think version is: 3 infantry units have stealth now

    • @Booley95
      @Booley95 20 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      @@lionusoctavus6444 Haha thanks

    • @batshit36
      @batshit36 2 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      40K being complicated? Especially in one of the armies known for being complicated? Get out

  • @WeirdWizardDave
    @WeirdWizardDave 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +3

    Yeah but you can understand because those poor GSC players were only sitting on a paltry 60% win rate. So they really do need a series of great improvements and straight buffs. Unlike sisters on their despicable, unacceptable 50% win rate who must be nerfed. NERFED INTO THE GROUND WITH YOU! Seriously I'm happy GSC are getting cool stuff, but I assume there units are going way WAY up in price now right? no?

    • @Amdor
      @Amdor 20 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +3

      1)This is not for competitive play 2)Sisters got rule nuked for some reason but gsc did get quite a decent nerf point-wise on two key units. And by key I mean they are in every army, in one case it's multiples in every army ;) (still not fair to do tripple-tap to sisters mind you)

    • @MetPhD
      @MetPhD 20 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +2

      The win rate relies on trapping most opponents in their deployment zone. It’s a way to win that lots of casual players (like me lol) don’t like. The win rate for casual games is going to be much worse than the competitive numbers.

    • @WeirdWizardDave
      @WeirdWizardDave 19 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      @@Amdor Sure I'm just being salty ;) Also I do play in a crusade, though perhaps luckily for me the GSC player switched to a Chaos after the GSC codex due to his disappointment with the rules. I imagine he's kicking himself a bit now...