ME 274: Dynamics: Chapter 17.2 - 17.3

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 33

  • @pridez6132
    @pridez6132 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I can not hear this.

  • @anasabdelfattah5285
    @anasabdelfattah5285 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In 14:00 while calculating the moment about point B, why you took the moment of inertia of G mass center not C ?

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      When you sum moments about a point other than the mass center (in this case b) you need this equation: sum moments about b = Moment of inertia about g (mass center) * alpha + vector between g and b cross mass * acceleration of mass center.

  • @roanrhemrev1591
    @roanrhemrev1591 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it correct to say that the acceleration of the mass center of the system (G) is lineair to the acceleration of point C? At 17:41 you state that the total sum of forces (of the full system) in the y-direction is equal to the mass and acceleration of just the spool…?

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only the spool is accelerating and we are treating the spool and cart as a single system, so the total sum of forces (of the full system) in the y-direction is equal to the mass and acceleration of just the spool.

    • @roanrhemrev1591
      @roanrhemrev1591 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ColinSelleck Alright thank you sir! Got my test tomorrow and feeling a lot better about it because of your videos, thanks again!

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@roanrhemrev1591 You're welcome and good luck!

  • @africanprincess7896
    @africanprincess7896 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For example 1, 9:04 why isn't the frictional force at the wheels accounted for?

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We were told to neglect the mass of the wheels, which is code for ignore the friction of the wheels.

    • @africanprincess7896
      @africanprincess7896 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Okay. Thank you very much.

  • @HashemAljifri515
    @HashemAljifri515 ปีที่แล้ว

    In 12.40: took moment about wheel B and got NA = 470, NB,570. Any suggestions? If we were to take the moment about any point we should get the same answer ..from statics course

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  ปีที่แล้ว

      I made a mistake in the video Na is 470 and Nb is 571.

  • @matovumatthew97
    @matovumatthew97 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Try to be louder next tym plizz

  • @ashlynnundlall
    @ashlynnundlall 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I took the sum of the moments about point B at 13:04 and got 470.4 N as the answer. Any suggestions as to why I got a different answer? I did that to eliminate an unknown.

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hard to say what the error was but it should give you the same answer.

  • @ahmedobidat1743
    @ahmedobidat1743 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does anyone know why in 14:37, the professor was able to change the summation of moments about b to rc with respect to b multiplied by mass of the spool?

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is because only the spool is accelerating in this composite body.

    • @ahmedobidat1743
      @ahmedobidat1743 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you, but you said earlier in the video that if a rigid body undergoes only translation, all of the particles of the body have the same acceleration, so a sub G = a sub C, so if that is true why would you change r of G with respect to B to r of C with respect to B. That would give you a different answer

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      The spool's mass center is at C, not at G. So when summing moments about B, I use the vector from B to C and the acceleration of the spool's mass center. Remember, the equations require the location of the mass center of the body, not just any point on the body.

  • @aryanpanthri4665
    @aryanpanthri4665 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    at 8:14, isnt Mb supposed to be minus instead of plus in between as per the textbook?

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes - it should be ema(t) - hma(n)

  • @haydezam8668
    @haydezam8668 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    in the third example in minute 13:36, why are NA & NB multiplied by 2?

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because there are four wheels and due to symmetry, the front wheels have equal loading as do the rear wheels.

    • @tinamakombe5900
      @tinamakombe5900 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      They say there are four wheels so of course two at the back and two at the front do you take into account each wheel.

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Na and Nb forces would be the normal force at each respective wheel.

  • @atakan716
    @atakan716 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should add this to the playlist of Ch: 17 :)

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just added it. Thanks for the tip!

  • @ashlynnundlall
    @ashlynnundlall 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is the vector Rb/g not Rg/b as it goes down and to the left 16:33

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The equation always uses the vector from the point you are summing moments about to the mass center: Rg/b.

    • @ashlynnundlall
      @ashlynnundlall 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ColinSelleck But is that not up and to the left then sir in this video. Not down and to the right

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ashlynnundlall Since only the spool is moving I rewrote the equation as sum Moments about B = Rc/b cross mass * acceleration of the spool. Rc/b is to the left and up.

  • @linhngo3150
    @linhngo3150 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    16:32 shouldn't the i component be -0.5 because it is r of G with respect to B

    • @ColinSelleck
      @ColinSelleck  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry, just saw this. Since only the spool is moving, I rewrote the equation in terms of r of C with respect to B.