So true but look at the views over 2 years later and only 43k views. People get more than that with the dumbest shit.. I don’t understand how the general population has gotten so simple minded.
@@11ride4life Simple answer to the simple-minded question: The general population has attended public schools with Leftist and other so-called "teachers" who, themselves, have no clue and who spend all of their time regurgitating Leftist propaganda. Either that or they have had no schooling at all.
Thank you for finally explaining this stuff in a way that I can understand. You may not be a mathematician, but you are a great teacher. Thank you sir.
You sir are what we need on TH-cam, sheer knowledge no gimmicks and more knowledgeable then 99% of people working at gun stores ect. I’m come hear for knowledge abs you sir are helping hundreds of people thank you
He's in his "lab"today for lecture. Other days it's like shooting the $hit with a buddy, except we don't talk back. Man has his format down perfect. A true professional for our education.
I used to plug in music to fall asleep...now I listen to this gentleman talk about sectional density, ballistic coefficients, kinetic energy and rifle twist. I wake up and have to turn it off. No wonder my dreams are getting bizarre. Incredible info, thankyou.
You sir are a wealth of knowledge. I’m someone who has a very firm grasp of the subject and this is the best description I have heard yet. I really enjoy how you simplify things so anyone can understand. Thank you for sharing you knowledge and God bless.
it really shows you the level of BS that's out there doesn't it? I'd much rather watch and learn from this man than watch some combative" this vs that" caliber or rifle video
Thank You so much...now I can settle down and build accurate loads and quit worrying about whether or not I've got the "best" set up available. Thanks again! Just have to say you are the most respected man on the internet......I'm so glad I found you.
Again sir one of the best explanations available... you remind me of listening to my late father. Keep up the great work, so many shooters today need your wisdom. God bless.👍
Another splendid video. I have been wasting money buying boat tail bullets for short range hunting for a long time. Thank you so much for taking the time to explain the ballistics and the advantages of a flat bottom bullet for hunting. God bless you too.
You are amazing! I discovered your videos a fee months back. I have gotten back into shooting after 25 years away from it. And have spent literally days watching and re watching. Very much respect!
I really enjoy this channel; excellent, very well explained info. In addition, a clear and smooth usage of the English language; just like seating in a classroom listening to an older, experienced professor . Keep up the good work, Sir!!
I watched this video in response to an advertisement from Palmetto State listing a .223 ammunition featuring the boat tail. I think this video is going to be timeless, the information is so well presented. “Nothing is new under the sun”, explains why the Toyota Prius has the same shape after the 1st generation, it’s consistent to half of a boat tail above the tires. Thanks.
You amaze me, with your explanation of ballistics. I happen to be a "critical thinker", so I 100% understand everything that you say, and it makes perfect sense to me. Keep up the great work, sir. We appreciate your efforts.
I came back to this one and watched again to try to ingrain the information you've given. This video really was a big help on a subject I've tried to understand for a long time. Thanks.
Minor correction, a ballistic pendulum allows one to calculate the energy of the pendulum after the collision, which then allows for the calculation of the bullet's momentum prior to the collision. Knowing the bullet's mass, one can calculate its velocity and subsequently kinetic energy. Much of the bullet's energy will be lost as heat as it embeds in the pendulum, so the height the pendulum swings is in itself not a measure of projectile energy.
Projectiles didn't imbed in them because they were made of iron. The height to which the pendulum of known weight swung in reaction to known projectile weights was precisely how velocities were computed. History didn't vanish when they died. Researchers of the day recorded their findings with exact measurements of bullet weights and black powder charges that have been found quite accurate, because those folks first wrote the physics of energy that you quote.
@@GunBlue490 Respectfully, this is incorrect. As explained by the inventor of the ballistic pendulum, Benjamin Robins, in his 1805 book, New Principles of Gunnery, his steel pendulums were faced with wood specifically so the projectile would be embedded. This is essential for relating the pendulum's height to bullet velocity (via the process I outlined previously), since any reflection of the projectile will result in uncertainty as to the system's total momentum.
Very good gun blue. This is something my husband has suspected for a long time. His favourite bullet of all time is the 180 gr. Hornady spire point interlock. Nothing groups better or is more effective on game. He has tried all the boattails etc etc. and nothing groups as tight or is more reasonable in price as that flat base bullet. Also that Remington Corelokt is another good one also flat base.
I learned this the hard way. I have a Remington Model 700 and Winchester Model 70, both in .243. In lengthy comparison shooting both boat tail (Hornady American Whitetail & Federal Fusion) vs. flat based (Nosler Part & other FB bullets), both rifles were much less accurate with BT than FB, at both 50 and 100 yard ranges. It really wasn't close. I have wasted a lot of money on BT ammo when I would have been better off with FB in typical hunting situations. Thankfully, in looking back over the last 40 years of successful deer hunting, most of my bullets have been FB. I got sucked into advertising and long range shooters touting boat tails and bought a lot of it (and gave most of it away). If you're hunting deer in the 200 yard range or less, stick to no frills flat based bullets.
This topic was always so difficult for me to understand, so I took the easy way out and avoided the issue. Glad to get this presentation and have some basic understanding.
Another absolutely fantastic video. Pearland of wisdom! I have for quite a while thought this modern craze of hunters chasing the highest coefficient has been a crock of misinformed bs! It is refreshing to have this verified by someone so knowledgeable!
This is only the second comment that I have ever made online. The first comment was on another one of your videos. Thank you for your interesting and to the point videos. I agree with many of the other viewers comments including the humour and history.(Benjamin Baskin Robbins)
This is a topic of great interest to me currently. I have planned my rifle build to be up to 200 yd Target and I would like to work up a load to maximize accuracy at that distance. I was getting ready to purchase 150 grain Sierra's matchking and 142gr Hornady ELD Match bullets which feature boat tails. I think I will drop the ELD for a comparable weight flat tail. Thank you for this instructional. I always learn a lot no matter what video I choose of yours.
You have stated this subject well. You cleared up some areas for me and I thank you for that. Hope you, your wife and Bennie are doing well. God Bless.
You are fantastic at turning a complex intricate subject into an easily understood subject. I simply love listening to you talk about firearms. I would love to hear your opinions on the "sweet spot" bullet weights for the popular cartridges for hunting and target shooting. I am new to reloading (about 18months) and as you mentioned, I have fallen into the trap of assuming that high BC is the way to go. Knowing your thoughts on where the sweet spot is will give me a good starting point to work on different loads.
Smart Alec comment first: What I’ve learned is that if you speed in your car, you should really speed to expose yourself to the police for the minimum amount of time. Amazingly well explained. As a pilot, I am familiar with many of those principles. It is hard to explain to a beginner. Mr GunBlue490 did an awesome job to do just that. Thank you.
You sir are a champion of the firearm community. I wish you were my grandfather. There's nothing i would like more than to spend a weekend with you picking your brain about firearms topics. Once again you are a champion god bless and be well.
This means alot to me! As I listen to your numbers go by, I realize that, after fantasizing for years about shooting at long range, I became programmed, by the numbers, to believe I could shoot more accurately with a boat tail! After many of those years, I finally realized my fantasy at one kilometer. It turned out that I don't cotton to all of the analysis and control necessary to get good results at great distances. I'm glad I did it and encourage anyone to take that adventure! I, however, could not actually take those steps and do all of the work, without the help of an expert who wanted my help with learning how to reload. We both had a successful journey! I hit a twelve-inch steel plate at 1,000 meters and he he learned to develop a load that allowed him to hit the same spot, three times, at 500 yards. I'm not a hunter and I typically shoot paper at 100 yards. I believe that the extra cost of ELD bullets with boat tails, in that case, is not warranted.
BT bullets can be very accurate and consistent and flat base bullets can be comparatively more inaccurate given the same caliber. That depends on many things ( interaction of particular riffle with particular bullet, actual subsonic or supersonic range mix etc). It can't be generalized like this video suggests. But one thing is sure: BT ammo is more expensive and in many cases doesn't make noticable difference
I can't believe you havn't more subscribers. Okay, i get it... maybe you don't inspire what the young kids are seeking for - intelligence wasted, again - but seriously... it doesn't take a genious to realize you are not only very knowledgeable but also and, maybe above all, are a great human being with observational qualities we all wish our kids could posess when we first imagine a familly future (if i make sense here...). Thank you for being critical and keeping pushing the enveloppe further in separating what really matters in the end (whatever it might be for type).
Love it love it love it! Even though I've known what you said in this video, for thirty years, I watched every second of it. I agreed with every aspect of it and would be hard pressed to say that about any other video I've watched on youtube. Well maybe a few others, but you did it well and easy to understand for someone who didn't know. When I started reloading, back in the seventies, I was perplexed and confused by the mountain of information that was available and it's even worse today. I'm sure you have helped a lot of people that weren't sure or didn't know at all what bullet coefficients was all about. Less time for conditions to act on the bullet, sums it really well and I've never heard anyone relate to it that way. Numbers are just that and every gun is different. You have to stuff some and go out and shoot them to know if your getting the performance that is right for what you're doing Great video from a competent man who knows what he's talking about. Thanks!
I have to add something about the pronghorn antelope portion. He is right. It's true that many people will never see them. It's also true that those antelope have eyesight that boggles the mind and they run when they see anything that spooks them (often from long distances). It's often said they are born at 55 mph, so if you think you will get a shot at them once they've seen you, good luck with that. So how does this matter? It matters because there are idiots out there that don't hunt. Instead they get wherever is convenient to them and start lobbing bullets at the antelope until they get lucky and hit one sometime. Instead of being a hunter where you analyze the wind direction, the direction the herd is moving, the terrain and your position relative to theirs and plotting a path to position yourself for a good close ethical shot, they instead just go out and shoot at animals. It's disgusting. I love the new technologies and how we are getting better at teaching long range shooting, but all of this is contributing to a bunch of people that all think they are the Carlos Hathcock of the hunting world and can just go out with their expensive rifle and no experience and just shoot something. We are finding a lot of animals with legs shot off etc. Can I hit an animal at long range? I'm sure I can. Do I try? Nope. I owe that animal a clean kill so I'll work a little harder to make that happen.
Enjoyed the video. It’s the second time I’ve watched it. Don’t forget that a lot of reloaders prefer boat tails, because they are easier to start into a case.
That's very true with 22 bores, but there's very little difference with larger ones, because the edge radius is not as sharp. My greater point is understanding their ballistic value, which is very commonly misinterpreted. Many dealers no longer can even sell flat base bullets because of this unfortunate perception that boattail bullets are unqualifiably better.
Thanks Gunblue I'm 35 I used to get caught up in numbers. To me now they are just for reference. My brothers get caught in the numbers and prove my point in the field or at the range regularly. I share the save views as you. Thanks for the info I'm learning more and keep it going.
Never worried about bc. Always shoot the bullet my rifle likes best and I never shoot anything past the point where the velocity is enough to make that bullet expand.
Very interesting how cartridges which seem so well suited to short flat bottom bullets with a short ogive and low b c. perform with degrees of precision under .5 m.o.a. at and beyond 450 yards (i.e.22-250)
It's funny because my rifle does shoot flat based bullets most accurate in spite of all the hype with boat tails. I hunt with medium quality amo, and it works out just fine. I like to save money! Thank you for confirming what I was suspecting.
Actually I learned a lot...I learned that for the most part, for what I'm trying to achieve with my shooting, I've been basically wasting my money buying fancy BS bullets for the last 2 years.
I would be very interested in hearing about some of the bullets and loads you have worked up for your 22-250 Reminton. I think you stated that it was a 1 in 12 twist. I have come into one myself and was courius . I owned one in traditional twist of 1-14. Was a very accurate rifle. The one that I now have is a Savage. Was in particular thinking about nosler 60 gr partions a they also produce a 60 gr varmint bullet that is boattailed. And if you have had any problems with them stabilizing. Thank You.
Excellent video, not boring at all, very interesting to hear it all put into perspective rather that reading about it from manual to manual and being lead off on the chase for a higher B.C. bullet. The manuals are put out by bullet manufactures after all. Thankful about your explanation on the hunting bullet and flat base relationship, I was thinking I needed a better bullet than the Interlock but now I know why it’s being sold and not discontinued after this many years. Thank you and all the best,
I could be wrong, but seems like in the bullet market, they are making tougher bullets in the boat tails for big game, and kind of leave out the flat base in that regard. Ive heard of some bullets disintegrating on impact, which is why I think they make bonded bullets. I dont think I see much flat bases if any in a bonded. This video kind of answered some of my questions.
Very happy that I found your channel. Trying to come up with an accurate load for my rifle as factory ammo for the .308 Norma mag is very expensive. Gonna try me some flat based bullets.
Thank You Mate, for again sharing your extensive knowledge and experience. Your videos are informative, down to earth and make a lot of sense. I wish I'd seen the one about a case stuck in the Die and how easily it can be removed, before my LGS told me, I had to buy another die set. I've been frustrated by stability issues with the OLD School, slow 1-12 twist barrel in my Savage 24, under over 223/12G. It's surprisingly a 200m 0.5-1MOA 3 Shot grouper upto 50-55gn. But 60gn Partitions are as high as I can go, before the higher BC projectiles spread out, or even Tumble, 69gn keyholing at 25m. So you're spot on about the sweet spot for a calibre and especially twist rate.
Seems that the "sweet spot" for a .243, is between 85-95 grain pills. Would love to hear what the sweet spot would be for other calibers. I really enjoy the science of ballistics. Almost as much as shooting...
I understand and believe almost everything that this man has presented ,I will add a little of my own thoughts, bullet manufacturers are in business to make money and one of the things that they do is called marketing, so if one can come up with another bullet design and market it as having greater ballistic coefficient general sales go up , see they’re hoping that that will entice you to buy from them, be your own advocate ! My Opinion 😊
I definitely didn't know all of this, so I think I learned quite a bit. I think that running some calculations on just standard 5.56 NATO ammo can mirror some of the conclusions here about muzzle velocity versus BC. I've always found it interesting that Mk262 is considered the gold standard for long range performance, when it takes it about 500 yards to overtake M855, and it takes M855 to nearly 400 yards to overtake M193 despite the higher BC. Something to consider when it comes to the new military cartridges being considered, that the basic M193's high muzzle velocity gives it a very remarkably long range BZO, right alongside M855. That's a big problem if you're using a BDC optic like an ACOG with Mk262, it just would not match, or a red dot that wouldn't have the same trajectory when zeroed at a standard 25m/36 yard distance. It's a shame that M193 isn't especially accurate compared to the boutique loads, but I guess I understand the principle, that there are tradeoffs to everything in ballistics and you can't just go based on the sticker numbers in practice.
Apparently the boat tail became popular during ww1 when the Maxim machine gun was firing a field of fire beating a zone over a hill (indirect fire ) they found the flat base bullets were becoming unstable below speed of sound and keyhole so they started using boat tale that added resistance to the rear of the bullet like a arrow to stabilize it when it went subsonic. When ppl read about a boat tail it just sounds more accurate and it is at extreme distances like indirect firing. Like a Mortar so ya if u can see what your shooting at good then use a flat their more accurate.
I really enjoy your work on here. Slow and methodical, yet I don't get bored watching (despite the internet impatience effect). That's real skill. Thanks.
Thanks for your video. I have always loaded boat tail bullets in my rifles, primarily for ease of loading. During this ammo component shortage, I was able to buy some Remington Lokt PSP 175 grain flat bottom bullets for my 7mm Remington mag rifle. The bottom of the bullets will not feed into the top of the cartridge case without crushing the case mouth. Would you recommend a case mouth expander or something else to help, or use some sort of reamer? I haven’t been able to find any help online for this problem. I would appreciate any help that you may be able to suggest. Thank you.
This is what TH-cam could be. Intelligent, practical, experienced. Thank you once again for taking the time and effort to transmit your knowledge.
lpalerme
Thank you.
So true but look at the views over 2 years later and only 43k views.
People get more than that with the dumbest shit.. I don’t understand how the general population has gotten so simple minded.
@@11ride4life Simple answer to the simple-minded question: The general population has attended public schools with Leftist and other so-called "teachers" who, themselves, have no clue and who spend all of their time regurgitating Leftist propaganda. Either that or they have had no schooling at all.
@@johnschmidt6089 You are right, I hated school and finished 2 years early as I taught myself much more than I ever got from a public school teacher.
TH-cam has greatly backslid.
We are privileged to have such a teacher of high caliber.
*Ballistic Co-Efficient
Nice pun! 😄
(Some people's "caliber" seems to be *.51-50)*
No one but no one puts out videos as great as his when it comes to anything firearms.
Thank you for finally explaining this stuff in a way that I can understand. You may not be a mathematician, but you are a great teacher. Thank you sir.
Red Sky
My privilege.
@@GunBlue490 -- Blue, could you direct us to a chart of what you call the sweet spot bullet weights for common rifle calibers?
You sir are what we need on TH-cam, sheer knowledge no gimmicks and more knowledgeable then 99% of people working at gun stores ect. I’m come hear for knowledge abs you sir are helping hundreds of people thank you
Most knowledgeable man on the subject of firearms in the country.
He's in his "lab"today for lecture. Other days it's like shooting the $hit with a buddy, except we don't talk back. Man has his format down perfect. A true professional for our education.
I used to plug in music to fall asleep...now I listen to this gentleman talk about sectional density, ballistic coefficients, kinetic energy and rifle twist. I wake up and have to turn it off. No wonder my dreams are getting bizarre. Incredible info, thankyou.
I think it's his accent, tone, and cadence of speech.
So effective.
Yes indeed. And the endless stream of info that appears to have no limit.@@saleembarmania5295
You sir are a wealth of knowledge. I’m someone who has a very firm grasp of the subject and this is the best description I have heard yet. I really enjoy how you simplify things so anyone can understand. Thank you for sharing you knowledge and God bless.
The real master rifleman. I hope that your videos are saved in the archives of shooter information.
Since I found this channel I have more or less stopped looking at other shooting related "facts" channels..
Same Here!
it really shows you the level of BS that's out there doesn't it? I'd much rather watch and learn from this man than watch some combative" this vs that" caliber or rifle video
I know he makes them look like TMZ
@arkoutarkout3654
They are like TMZ. Tons of clickbait BS spewed over and over again.
Thank You so much...now I can settle down and build accurate loads and quit worrying about whether or not I've got the "best" set up available. Thanks again! Just have to say you are the most respected man on the internet......I'm so glad I found you.
Again sir one of the best explanations available... you remind me of listening to my late father. Keep up the great work, so many shooters today need your wisdom. God bless.👍
Another splendid video. I have been wasting money buying boat tail bullets for short range hunting for a long time. Thank you so much for taking the time to explain the ballistics and the advantages of a flat bottom bullet for hunting. God bless you too.
You are amazing! I discovered your videos a fee months back. I have gotten back into shooting after 25 years away from it. And have spent literally days watching and re watching. Very much respect!
As simple as it is, him dropping the bullet with his fingers at the end of the video really taught me an important lesson. Thanks for these videos.
I really enjoy this channel; excellent, very well explained info. In addition, a clear and smooth usage of the English language; just like seating in a classroom listening to an older, experienced professor . Keep up the good work, Sir!!
Excellent presentation, almost 30 years of playing with various calibers and ballistic calculators summed up in less than an hour.
Its like getting to step back in time and hear the gun shop ramblings of my highway patrolmen grandfather in his prime.
I watched this video in response to an advertisement from Palmetto State listing a .223 ammunition featuring the boat tail. I think this video is going to be timeless, the information is so well presented. “Nothing is new under the sun”, explains why the Toyota Prius has the same shape after the 1st generation, it’s consistent to half of a boat tail above the tires. Thanks.
Only you, sir, could make this this interesting and informative. Master teacher.
You amaze me, with your explanation of ballistics. I happen to be a "critical thinker", so I 100% understand everything that you say, and it makes perfect sense to me. Keep up the great work, sir. We appreciate your efforts.
I appreciate your support.
Buy far my most favorite person on TH-cam
Thank you for taking time to share your knowledge
Thank you I learn so much watching your vids
Your truly a treasure to us all
I came back to this one and watched again to try to ingrain the information you've given. This video really was a big help on a subject I've tried to understand for a long time. Thanks.
Minor correction, a ballistic pendulum allows one to calculate the energy of the pendulum after the collision, which then allows for the calculation of the bullet's momentum prior to the collision. Knowing the bullet's mass, one can calculate its velocity and subsequently kinetic energy. Much of the bullet's energy will be lost as heat as it embeds in the pendulum, so the height the pendulum swings is in itself not a measure of projectile energy.
Projectiles didn't imbed in them because they were made of iron. The height to which the pendulum of known weight swung in reaction to known projectile weights was precisely how velocities were computed. History didn't vanish when they died. Researchers of the day recorded their findings with exact measurements of bullet weights and black powder charges that have been found quite accurate, because those folks first wrote the physics of energy that you quote.
@@GunBlue490 Respectfully, this is incorrect. As explained by the inventor of the ballistic pendulum, Benjamin Robins, in his 1805 book, New Principles of Gunnery, his steel pendulums were faced with wood specifically so the projectile would be embedded. This is essential for relating the pendulum's height to bullet velocity (via the process I outlined previously), since any reflection of the projectile will result in uncertainty as to the system's total momentum.
Very good gun blue. This is something my husband has suspected for a long time. His favourite bullet of all time is the 180 gr. Hornady spire point interlock. Nothing groups better or is more effective on game.
He has tried all the boattails etc etc. and nothing groups as tight or is more reasonable in price as that flat base bullet. Also that Remington Corelokt is another good one also flat base.
I learned this the hard way. I have a Remington Model 700 and Winchester Model 70, both in .243. In lengthy comparison shooting both boat tail (Hornady American Whitetail & Federal Fusion) vs. flat based (Nosler Part & other FB bullets), both rifles were much less accurate with BT than FB, at both 50 and 100 yard ranges. It really wasn't close.
I have wasted a lot of money on BT ammo when I would have been better off with FB in typical hunting situations. Thankfully, in looking back over the last 40 years of successful deer hunting, most of my bullets have been FB. I got sucked into advertising and long range shooters touting boat tails and bought a lot of it (and gave most of it away). If you're hunting deer in the 200 yard range or less, stick to no frills flat based bullets.
I'm going to adopt Gunblue as my father.
Decon
He's my adopted grandad but GunBlue doesn't know it😂😂😂
I think we all claim him as a favourite uncle!
He has many adopted grandkids.
This topic was always so difficult for me to understand, so I took the easy way out and avoided the issue. Glad to get this presentation and have some basic understanding.
Another great job. I really enjoyed this video as well as your others. When my grandsons are older I plan to have them watch your videos.
The Sierra 130 pro hunter flat base is exactly what i load in my 270. It works very well on whitetail.
perfect lecture...I could sit in your workshop all day!
holy crap - you just gave me 3 years of knowledge in 55 min :-O
Another absolutely fantastic video. Pearland of wisdom! I have for quite a while thought this modern craze of hunters chasing the highest coefficient has been a crock of misinformed bs! It is refreshing to have this verified by someone so knowledgeable!
This is only the second comment that I have ever made online. The first comment was on another one of your videos. Thank you for your interesting and to the point videos. I agree with many of the other viewers comments including the humour and history.(Benjamin Baskin Robbins)
This is a topic of great interest to me currently. I have planned my rifle build to be up to 200 yd Target and I would like to work up a load to maximize accuracy at that distance. I was getting ready to purchase 150 grain Sierra's matchking and 142gr Hornady ELD Match bullets which feature boat tails. I think I will drop the ELD for a comparable weight flat tail. Thank you for this instructional. I always learn a lot no matter what video I choose of yours.
You have stated this subject well. You cleared up some areas for me and I thank you for that. Hope you, your wife and Bennie are doing well. God Bless.
you are a treasured resource! u should be bigger than jack o Conner, Elmer Keith, and jimCarmichael
Babay Bluegill
I'm just sharing the gift God gave me, all thanks be to Our Lord Jesus, from Whom all gifts flow.
Amen! I KNEW you knew the Lord - it ooses out of you - for His Glory!!
@@GunBlue490 You are a good man Sir.
Baskins and Robins, Vids just keep getting better - now we have humour!!
Just amazing to listen to! Always learn something!!!!
Mr. Gunblue490 ...Please do a video on your thoughts on all copper or guilded metal bullets vs standard copper and lead bullets.. on game animals
I'm VERY interested! Copper fouling. SD of copper. Terminal ballistics of the GMX bullet, specifically?
His brain is a veritable encyclopedia!
You are fantastic at turning a complex intricate subject into an easily understood subject. I simply love listening to you talk about firearms. I would love to hear your opinions on the "sweet spot" bullet weights for the popular cartridges for hunting and target shooting. I am new to reloading (about 18months) and as you mentioned, I have fallen into the trap of assuming that high BC is the way to go. Knowing your thoughts on where the sweet spot is will give me a good starting point to work on different loads.
Thank you for taking the time to explain so in depth.
Smart Alec comment first: What I’ve learned is that if you speed in your car, you should really speed to expose yourself to the police for the minimum amount of time.
Amazingly well explained. As a pilot, I am familiar with many of those principles. It is hard to explain to a beginner. Mr GunBlue490 did an awesome job to do just that. Thank you.
Wisdom on display. Thank You.
I do not listen to music at work ...I listen to this man’s knowledge.
Just let me say, "Thank you."
I never though I would spend so much time learning about hunting because of a video game. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
You sir are a champion of the firearm community. I wish you were my grandfather. There's nothing i would like more than to spend a weekend with you picking your brain about firearms topics. Once again you are a champion god bless and be well.
This means alot to me! As I listen to your numbers go by, I realize that, after fantasizing for years about shooting at long range, I became programmed, by the numbers, to believe I could shoot more accurately with a boat tail!
After many of those years, I finally realized my fantasy at one kilometer. It turned out that I don't cotton to all of the analysis and control necessary to get good results at great distances. I'm glad I did it and encourage anyone to take that adventure! I, however, could not actually take those steps and do all of the work, without the help of an expert who wanted my help with learning how to reload.
We both had a successful journey! I hit a twelve-inch steel plate at 1,000 meters and he he learned to develop a load that allowed him to hit the same spot, three times, at 500 yards.
I'm not a hunter and I typically shoot paper at 100 yards. I believe that the extra cost of ELD bullets with boat tails, in that case, is not warranted.
BT bullets can be very accurate and consistent and flat base bullets can be comparatively more inaccurate given the same caliber. That depends on many things ( interaction of particular riffle with particular bullet, actual subsonic or supersonic range mix etc). It can't be generalized like this video suggests. But one thing is sure: BT ammo is more expensive and in many cases doesn't make noticable difference
And I thought your written response to my questions was great!!! Many thanks!
I’m new to shooting and wish I would have found your channel way sooner than I did. Better late than never.
This certainly changes my way of thinking when buying ammunition now . Great video as always ! Thank you for sharing your knowledge and understanding.
Thank you for this video! I really enjoy the information you present and how you present it. Blessings in Christ!
I can't believe you havn't more subscribers. Okay, i get it... maybe you don't inspire what the young kids are seeking for - intelligence wasted, again - but seriously... it doesn't take a genious to realize you are not only very knowledgeable but also and, maybe above all, are a great human being with observational qualities we all wish our kids could posess when we first imagine a familly future (if i make sense here...). Thank you for being critical and keeping pushing the enveloppe further in separating what really matters in the end (whatever it might be for type).
Love it love it love it! Even though I've known what you said in this video, for thirty years, I watched every second of it. I agreed with every aspect of it and would be hard pressed to say that about any other video I've watched on youtube. Well maybe a few others, but you did it well and easy to understand for someone who didn't know. When I started reloading, back in the seventies, I was perplexed and confused by the mountain of information that was available and it's even worse today. I'm sure you have helped a lot of people that weren't sure or didn't know at all what bullet coefficients was all about. Less time for conditions to act on the bullet, sums it really well and I've never heard anyone relate to it that way. Numbers are just that and every gun is different. You have to stuff some and go out and shoot them to know if your getting the performance that is right for what you're doing
Great video from a competent man who knows what he's talking about. Thanks!
Another excellent presentation! Your video's are very much appreciated and informative.
Continue learning watching you share your knowledge
I have to add something about the pronghorn antelope portion. He is right. It's true that many people will never see them. It's also true that those antelope have eyesight that boggles the mind and they run when they see anything that spooks them (often from long distances). It's often said they are born at 55 mph, so if you think you will get a shot at them once they've seen you, good luck with that. So how does this matter? It matters because there are idiots out there that don't hunt. Instead they get wherever is convenient to them and start lobbing bullets at the antelope until they get lucky and hit one sometime. Instead of being a hunter where you analyze the wind direction, the direction the herd is moving, the terrain and your position relative to theirs and plotting a path to position yourself for a good close ethical shot, they instead just go out and shoot at animals. It's disgusting. I love the new technologies and how we are getting better at teaching long range shooting, but all of this is contributing to a bunch of people that all think they are the Carlos Hathcock of the hunting world and can just go out with their expensive rifle and no experience and just shoot something. We are finding a lot of animals with legs shot off etc. Can I hit an animal at long range? I'm sure I can. Do I try? Nope. I owe that animal a clean kill so I'll work a little harder to make that happen.
Thank you for your comment. I personally think that long range hunting is unethical for the vast majority of hunters.
Great video, I learned a lot. Thank you for your time.
Wow! Fantastic content. Very educational. Was not bored at all! Thanks for another great video
Enjoyed the video. It’s the second time I’ve watched it. Don’t forget that a lot of reloaders prefer boat tails, because they are easier to start into a case.
That's very true with 22 bores, but there's very little difference with larger ones, because the edge radius is not as sharp. My greater point is understanding their ballistic value, which is very commonly misinterpreted. Many dealers no longer can even sell flat base bullets because of this unfortunate perception that boattail bullets are unqualifiably better.
Another great video! Learned so much as always.
Thanks Gunblue I'm 35 I used to get caught up in numbers. To me now they are just for reference. My brothers get caught in the numbers and prove my point in the field or at the range regularly. I share the save views as you. Thanks for the info I'm learning more and keep it going.
Never worried about bc. Always shoot the bullet my rifle likes best and I never shoot anything past the point where the velocity is enough to make that bullet expand.
Very interesting how cartridges which seem so well suited to short flat bottom bullets with a short ogive and low b c. perform with degrees of precision under .5 m.o.a. at and beyond 450 yards (i.e.22-250)
It's funny because my rifle does shoot flat based bullets most accurate in spite of all the hype with boat tails. I hunt with medium quality amo, and it works out just fine. I like to save money! Thank you for confirming what I was suspecting.
So loved the history lesson! Thankyou very interesting. It is an honour to listen to you, Sir. Roger
Yes, another great video.
Thank you for sharing your wealth of knowledge.
Are you ok. Hope you are doing well. Miss the videos.
Great material , you are my first go too when I question myself . Thank you .
Just ran across your channel. Thanks for putting in all the work to make these videos
This was a great video. There was critical data and that is more useful than outlandish opinions.
Actually I learned a lot...I learned that for the most part, for what I'm trying to achieve with my shooting, I've been basically wasting my money buying fancy BS bullets for the last 2 years.
I would be very interested in hearing about some of the bullets and loads you have worked up for your 22-250 Reminton. I think you stated that it was a 1 in 12 twist. I have come into one myself and was courius . I owned one in traditional twist of 1-14. Was a very accurate rifle. The one that I now have is a Savage. Was in particular thinking about nosler 60 gr partions a they also produce a 60 gr varmint bullet that is boattailed. And if you have had any problems with them stabilizing. Thank You.
Excellent video, not boring at all, very interesting to hear it all put into perspective rather that reading about it from manual to manual and being lead off on the chase for a higher B.C. bullet. The manuals are put out by bullet manufactures after all. Thankful about your explanation on the hunting bullet and flat base relationship, I was thinking I needed a better bullet than the Interlock but now I know why it’s being sold and not discontinued after this many years.
Thank you and all the best,
Great practical knowledge. The best kind. Thanks 👍
Thanks Gunblue490! Great video.
Greetings my favorite Patriot! Another name I prefer to use for 'drag factor' is turbulence.
Fantastic Information!! Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge!
Thank you, another very informative vid.
I could be wrong, but seems like in the bullet market, they are making tougher bullets in the boat tails for big game, and kind of leave out the flat base in that regard. Ive heard of some bullets disintegrating on impact, which is why I think they make bonded bullets. I dont think I see much flat bases if any in a bonded. This video kind of answered some of my questions.
Very happy that I found your channel. Trying to come up with an accurate load for my rifle as factory ammo for the .308 Norma mag is very expensive. Gonna try me some flat based bullets.
Try some Noslers for decent Boat tails. Hornady makes excellent bullets. Speer makes cheap ones.
The SP is flat base. My Ballistic Tip is boat tail.
@@joemoment-o1275 Ok. Thanks for the tip.
God bless You Sir. Its nice to listen to You.
A wonderful lesson! Thank you
You sir are a valuable resource. Thank you.
Thank You Mate, for again sharing your extensive knowledge and experience. Your videos are informative, down to earth and make a lot of sense.
I wish I'd seen the one about a case stuck in the Die and how easily it can be removed, before my LGS told me, I had to buy another die set.
I've been frustrated by stability issues with the OLD School, slow 1-12 twist barrel in my Savage 24, under over 223/12G. It's surprisingly a 200m 0.5-1MOA 3 Shot grouper upto 50-55gn. But 60gn Partitions are as high as I can go, before the higher BC projectiles spread out, or even Tumble, 69gn keyholing at 25m. So you're spot on about the sweet spot for a calibre and especially twist rate.
I like watching your videos. Im just wondering if you can do a video on the 7-30 waters.
Thank you for the video and sharing your wisdom.
Seems that the "sweet spot" for a .243, is between 85-95 grain pills. Would love to hear what the sweet spot would be for other calibers. I really enjoy the science of ballistics. Almost as much as shooting...
I would love to be able to buy his videos. Or a book about all his knowledge.....And also whats his name?
I understand and believe almost everything that this man has presented ,I will add a little of my own thoughts, bullet manufacturers are in business to make money and one of the things that they do is called marketing, so if one can come up with another bullet design and market it as having greater ballistic coefficient general sales go up , see they’re hoping that that will entice you to buy from them, be your own advocate ! My Opinion 😊
I definitely didn't know all of this, so I think I learned quite a bit. I think that running some calculations on just standard 5.56 NATO ammo can mirror some of the conclusions here about muzzle velocity versus BC. I've always found it interesting that Mk262 is considered the gold standard for long range performance, when it takes it about 500 yards to overtake M855, and it takes M855 to nearly 400 yards to overtake M193 despite the higher BC. Something to consider when it comes to the new military cartridges being considered, that the basic M193's high muzzle velocity gives it a very remarkably long range BZO, right alongside M855. That's a big problem if you're using a BDC optic like an ACOG with Mk262, it just would not match, or a red dot that wouldn't have the same trajectory when zeroed at a standard 25m/36 yard distance. It's a shame that M193 isn't especially accurate compared to the boutique loads, but I guess I understand the principle, that there are tradeoffs to everything in ballistics and you can't just go based on the sticker numbers in practice.
Apparently the boat tail became popular during ww1 when the Maxim machine gun was firing a field of fire beating a zone over a hill (indirect fire ) they found the flat base bullets were becoming unstable below speed of sound and keyhole so they started using boat tale that added resistance to the rear of the bullet like a arrow to stabilize it when it went subsonic. When ppl read about a boat tail it just sounds more accurate and it is at extreme distances like indirect firing. Like a Mortar so ya if u can see what your shooting at good then use a flat their more accurate.
I really enjoy your work on here. Slow and methodical, yet I don't get bored watching (despite the internet impatience effect). That's real skill. Thanks.
Thanks for your video. I have always loaded boat tail bullets in my rifles, primarily for ease of loading. During this ammo component shortage, I was able to buy some Remington Lokt PSP 175 grain flat bottom bullets for my 7mm Remington mag rifle. The bottom of the bullets will not feed into the top of the cartridge case without crushing the case mouth. Would you recommend a case mouth expander or something else to help, or use some sort of reamer? I haven’t been able to find any help online for this problem. I would appreciate any help that you may be able to suggest. Thank you.
I like boat tail bullets better, because they're easier to reload. Not as likely to crush the neck of the case, when seating the bullet.
Wish you were my grandfather, keep the excelent job, your videos are amazing !!!