Does Hydrogen On Demand Really Work?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
  • www.gastaxholid...
    Hydrogen On Demand (HOD) is getting a lot of attention these days. And why not? Gas prices going up, the economy tanking, major upheavals in the global oil market. We need a solution, and we need it now. But is HOD that solution? Let's find out.

ความคิดเห็น • 474

  • @geekhillbilly2636
    @geekhillbilly2636 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I built my 1st HHO generator in August 2020 and installed it into a 1999 Ranger with the 2.5 L4 engine. Drastic improvement in gas mileage, approaching 40 MPG using both. The truck spit out soot for close to 50 miles on that first run.The truck can run on the HHO system alone and has when gas went over $3.50 Gallon here in Southeastern Kentucky. Keep in mind that Southern Kentucky is a dumping ground for low quality fuels by all of Big Oil. I ran the Ranger from Jan 2021 until Nov 2022 on HHO alone, until gas dropped below that $3.50 mark.I recently replaced the generator with a home built dry cell type with more than double the capacity of the old one. Still runs like it has a 302 BOSS V8 under the hood. 221000 miles on the OEM engine and upon visual inspection of the piston tops when I replaced the plugs, no carbon build up. Scientifically done or not, I know it works and works well.

    • @malekshukor4669
      @malekshukor4669 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      MANTAP BRO... i like to learn more about HHO and need a TEACHER to give guide...

    • @bigsjohnson265
      @bigsjohnson265 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm working on mine this week, first time build and looking forward to it❤ was thinking about using mason jars but might use plastic bottles. Or wine bottles and quarks 😂

    • @cited_jupiter7
      @cited_jupiter7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Woow that's so awesome!! I have a 98 Ford ranger 4x4 manual and I'm going to buy hydroclubusa kit soon. I'm just hoping I can do it, it seems complicated but gotta figure it out i guess.
      How was your truck able to run only on the HHO? Was it threw the programming of the trucks computer or something? How were you able to do that?! 😮🤯

    • @Andrw67
      @Andrw67 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello, do you still use it?

    • @geekhillbilly2636
      @geekhillbilly2636 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Andrw67 I sure do. The old Ranger runs much better with it.

  • @clarkgriswold236
    @clarkgriswold236 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Thanks for showing me how to use a gas pump, been trying to figure that out for about 25 years now.

    • @whiteshadow247
      @whiteshadow247 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He was showing how to use it to get a consistent fill to get the most accurate reading for your gas mpg.

  • @robertmckinley2886
    @robertmckinley2886 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    We need to get our cars running 100% on hydrogen ! Let's give the oil companies a good ass kicking !!!

  • @michaelteeple8704
    @michaelteeple8704 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    A good suggestion on the fill up. Stopping as soon as pump kicks off the first time is extra important on newer cars because fuel will find its way into your evap. Canister and purge valve causing starting and idling issues. Thanks for the info.

    • @zap_collection6511
      @zap_collection6511 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My car is an 07 Pontiac solstice gxp and get this, the fuel filter is INSIDE the fuel pump. It's not something you can just change easily, you have to tear apart the trunk to access the tank and replace the pump if you want to replace the filter.
      After doing that once, I never let my tank get below 1/4 anymore. There was barely any debris in the tank after 145k factory miles, when I changed the pump, but still... I never wanna do that messy job again if I don't have to

    • @zap_collection6511
      @zap_collection6511 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Also, I am a gas station manager. I can tell you there is a large amount of sediment in those underground storage tanks.
      Figure you maybe use 12-18 gallons a week and you're worried about junk in your fuel tank.... The station I worked for sold about 40,000 gallons a week. That's seven years worth of junk pumped in every week.
      If you see a tanker dumping fuel at a station, avoid it. All that sediment is getting sitrred up

  • @johnholland4428
    @johnholland4428 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I can tell you it absolutely works I was out to prove it was bs so I built an Overkill hho generator and fabricated brackets to hold a couple generators belt driven by engine for plenty of power so there would be no excuse for it not producing enough power for the hho producer and to my surprise the engine ran on that alone no gas at all I revved it up drove it around the yard and then took it all down because I believe the catalyst I used in the water for conduction (sodium hydroxide) would destroy the metal in my engine but I must say to my surprise it worked

  • @Ferquan69
    @Ferquan69  15 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Actually, I did mention that I had tested my vehicle - got 18 mpg. I understand that it didn't work for you, but I can tell ya, it absolutely works. Consider that something in your installation or assembly process is compromising your HHO generation, OR your on-board computer is responding to the clean exhaust produced by the generator and ramping up the richness to "compensate". Had that problem myself, and fixed it with the installation of a home-made MAF sensor adjuster.

    • @douglb8960
      @douglb8960 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      any details on the homemade MAF?

  • @LockonStratosGN
    @LockonStratosGN 8 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    There's a music montage of him driving... He literally has a music montage in the video.

    • @1989truck
      @1989truck 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I love a good montage , my pulse was racing !! it was damn exciting

  • @phenamenol
    @phenamenol 10 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    thought he would have filled up ..turn off the hydrogen system and drive to see how far he went ..then repeat the process with the hydrogen and compare ...that would make more sense

    • @markmillard7961
      @markmillard7961 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      !? The System Shuts Off When Ignition Is Disingaged !?

    • @houseofmercyandlight6387
      @houseofmercyandlight6387 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe he knows the before fuel milage

    • @brianparent
      @brianparent 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There was a garage that was actually doing the same thing converting people's cars and trucks. Heck, Jack Nicholson's car ran on water. Same concept back in 1967. CBC News shared that video article. There was also a man that converted his entire farm to run on water as well.

  • @diji5071
    @diji5071 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "don't take my word for it, just go to my website and take my word for it!"

    • @brianparent
      @brianparent 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There was a garage that was actually doing the same thing converting people's cars and trucks. Heck, Jack Nicholson's car ran on water. Same concept back in 1967. CBC News shared that video article. There was also a man that converted his entire farm to run on water as well.

  • @earlybird1900
    @earlybird1900 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Absolutely true! I've installed in my own and friends vehicles and no complaints. Something noticeable especially if you drive a diesel vehicle is that dirty soot that is normally spewed out is eliminated. We've placed a glass sheet on the exhaust and noticed water condensation present. So instead of soot you get mostly H2O (water) quite a difference. Something to always check is your MAF sensors as the computer will take less exhaust gases as lean mixture and will send in more fuel. The MAF setup will correct that so mileage gaIns will be mantained. In the market there are also several gadgets such as the EIFES, the volos, etc which will compensate for this. Now in larger setups with high HHO output the PWM (Power Width Modulator) which regulate the HHO output as the temperature increases so just the right amount of HHO enters the engine.

    • @Andrw67
      @Andrw67 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello, do you still use it?

    • @dgarza5624
      @dgarza5624 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Would you be able to assist me in the build of a simple system so I can install in my truck?

  • @TheKingOfHalo
    @TheKingOfHalo 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Should've used an Explorer of the same year and drivetrain, but with a message center. It would display your average mpg and miles to empty. Much more accurate.

  • @Ferquan69
    @Ferquan69  14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    DeathAngel84299, I don't think you have to worry about the mason jar cracking. Those jars a pretty rugged and you don't fill it all the way to the top so there is room for the water to expand if it freezes. It takes only a matter of minutes for the water to thaw once the current gets moving through it. Still, plastic does work. Some of the best units sold online are made from plastic containers.

  • @SolarPoweredSteve
    @SolarPoweredSteve 14 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    this was really great! I'm going to have to try that, if it doesnt work, oh well!
    one thing i did think of, if you live in a colder environment, the water, even with salt can freeze and break the mason jar, thats why maybe plastics a better idea

  • @gregsbest
    @gregsbest 12 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for posting this video. If people have problems with claims, make a better mouse trap, or just move on- TH-cam has lots of videos to keep you entertained.
    As far as this HHo idea, I would like to see more scientific tests done( just my background talking here). I made a unit and it worked, did not post it because I only had 4-5 mpg improvement and done over 5-6000km( 3-3700mi.) There is merit to this project.
    Tx. for adding your contibution to this topic.!

  • @captaincurd2681
    @captaincurd2681 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hello folks, if you want to use Hydrogen convertor in your car, go ahead. It works. Just remember the hydrogen is not to be burned pure but mixed with car fuel before combustion. We are using it for months now.

  • @bigdaddydave3341
    @bigdaddydave3341 11 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I've been looking into trying to run my 1994 Honda Accord on HHO alone, but there seems to be many pitfalls in running a car on pure Hydrogen. It already gets around 37mpg highway. If I can't run it on NO gasoline, 55+mpg would be pretty sweet too.

    • @jasonsnell708
      @jasonsnell708 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hydrogen itself is very dangerous... why do you think it's ridiculously expensive? HHO delivers hyrdogen when needed, it doesn't store it.

    • @ryfodrea
      @ryfodrea 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can't use water to make a car run entirely on hydrogen. You still need electricity to separate the hydrogen from the water, and the electricity in a car comes from the engine. To just run on on hydrogen you would use more electricity than you could generate. This system only works if you add the hydrogen to the fuel in the engine. If you want a fully hydrogen car, ud need to have a car built for it, and fill the tank with hydrogen (which is expensive and hard to find). It's also very dangerous, going over a bump could make ur car explode. It's better to just use this system to make hydrogen as an additive to fuel. There's also a lot less hydrogen in these systems which makes them much safer.

    • @quantumleap359
      @quantumleap359 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      +ryfodrea But, it's already been proven that the hydrogen on demand systems do not help fuel mileage at all Dateline NBC had one installed on a car, and the fuel mileage was completely unchanged. No big, dramatic gains, nothing.

    • @veteranheavyequipmechanic4990
      @veteranheavyequipmechanic4990 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@quantumleap359 wow imagine that. Dateline never lies or distorts the truth. Just in case the sarcasm wasn't implied hard enough, dateline is full of shit, they lie anywhere they can to support their own agenda.

    • @veteranheavyequipmechanic4990
      @veteranheavyequipmechanic4990 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ryfodrea hydrogen will not explode from hitting a bump it requires an ignition source. If you want a full hydrogen car then you're going to have to be able to pressurize hydrogen. An hho generator as shown will not be able to keep up with demand, and a larger design would only overdraw your battery, unless you build and run a battery bank for the generator that you would have to charge after each use.

  • @PDXJack87
    @PDXJack87 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    hour should also make sure the tire pressure is good on all 4 tires

  • @geekhillbilly2636
    @geekhillbilly2636 ปีที่แล้ว

    On Fords especially look for and remove any air restriction between the MAF sensor and the air intake. On the 2.3 and 2.5 engines, there is one there. Take it out. Replace that paper filter with a conical Racing air filter. Increased air flow and those are reusable and cost the same OR LESS than the stock filters. I also installed a PCV Oil Catch Can and a coolant filter, using a remote oil filter relocation kit put in the inlet of the heater core. Cleans the coolant of the gunk that builds up. PS NEVER USE A FRAM OIL FILTER IF YOU VALUE YOUR ENGINE.

  • @lastchance8142
    @lastchance8142 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ok, so here's the thing. Water electrolysis to generate the hydrogen requires 25-30 Amps of electric current, which translates to about 2/3 horsepower used. The energy present in the hydrogen will be less than that, since a lot is used breaking the H20 bonds. Estimating for this and other losses means you are actually losing the energy equivalent of at least 1/3 hp trying to generate more power onboard! The Laws of thermodynamics cannot be sidestepped! A seperate source of hydrogen would be a different story. If you don't understand, consider this analogy: using your alternator to power an electric motor to assist your engine and expecting a fuel savings!

    • @curtisbrennan7134
      @curtisbrennan7134 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Last Chance i was just thinking the alternator is already producing electricity and the amount of hydrogen produced probably isn’t that much. But what if the way hod works isnt so much about adding energy to the combustion but using more of the energy in the gasoline. My thoughts are pure hydrogen and oxygen are being sent into the combustion chamber. The more oxygen the better the burn. Aswell hydrogen burns very quickly which could cause the fuel to burn quicker and be used to push the piston. Instead of being burned in the exhaust. Which would relate to the engine needing to put less fuel into the combustion chamber to get the same rpm. But one thing i would be worried about is hydrogen embrittlement of the metal.

    • @curtisbrennan7134
      @curtisbrennan7134 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Adding a change. And be used to push the piston earlier and with a faster combustion speed than pure gasoline

    • @zephyrtolliver4113
      @zephyrtolliver4113 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      an alternator puts out about 300 amps, 300 / 30 = 10, it uses 1/10th of it lmao no 2/3

  • @Healitnow
    @Healitnow ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Speaking of freezing does this have to be removed in winter or has a way been made for them to work....like an antifreeze or something.

  • @billiho1
    @billiho1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing! Defies all laws of physics! We have to believe this guy cause he must be telling the truth! He also has some beautiful oceanfront property available in Colorado for sale, and I think he's selling highway bridges as well. I would definitely invest with him!

    • @johnlopez3676
      @johnlopez3676 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mr billiho , didn't a famous man once say that there's a ding dong born every minute?

  • @slikdarelic
    @slikdarelic 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    so.. for all the doubters... what is the excuse behind the Ronn Motors Scorpion supercar?? its usin the same concept, and they say theyre getting 40mpg.. i would like someone to explain to me what exactly happening under the hood.

  • @SJNaka101
    @SJNaka101 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I'm claiming complete ignorance here so I'd appreciate not getting flamed for asking this question but... I see lots of folks claiming they've tried it and it works, and lots of folks shooting the idea down. However, the one thing I don't see is anyone claiming that they tried it and it DIDN'T work. Any of those out there?

    • @Numbah1Namek
      @Numbah1Namek 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      strangely enough I was wondering the same thing in my head... then I saw your comment. Good to know that someone put it out there 👊

    • @devilyn76
      @devilyn76 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      daddaflex... that is absolutely correct!!

    • @pete89spotsin
      @pete89spotsin 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've been trying to achieve better mpg via hho for over 6 years.....No success yet, yet I'm still trying. I know it's extremely explosive, so I guess I keep hoping and keep trying.

    • @ZeppelinPass
      @ZeppelinPass 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I have used HHO for 2 years, and in the time my mpg went from 24mpg to 29mpg. I went from 420miles a tank to 520miles
      I got this information from collecting around 800miles of fuel receipts and calculating the average. (I drive a lot)
      This is in a diesel 2.4L Ford Jumbo Transit
      I have no product to sell, or defend, I merely got one installed and it works for me.
      You do have to remember to top up your water tank every 250miles with deionised water, but that's about it.

    • @divasouls8502
      @divasouls8502 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ZeppelinPass Hi y'all! I believe HH0 works and is real! I've seen with my own eyes HHO fueling stations in California in 2016! I will gladly have an HHO kit put on my truck. But the HHO kit manufacturers are hard to find in the south!

  • @aqueousone
    @aqueousone 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    The variation in underground tank temperature between different stations is not nearly as relevant to this 'test' as the diff in temp of your SUV tank between immediately after you filled up (with cool fuel from the underground station tank) and an hour later after having driven 60+ miles over hot pavement. That cool fuel will expand. A real test would be to start and end with a near empty tank. Fill up in the morning; run to near empty; then wait till the next morning to fill up again

  • @Itsmeeman1
    @Itsmeeman1 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My car already does 28mpg (that's a UK gallon) but since we're paying about twice the price the US is then a little better mileage wouldn't be so bad! Now... which system of HOD is best...? hmmm...

  • @Ferquan69
    @Ferquan69  13 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Well, Adam. That might actually work, given that so much of the volume of a fart is methane gas. Hmmm. Maybe you're on to something. Of course, we're going to have to figure out how to make those farts happen a LOT (thank God for beans, right?) And then, anyone who wants to use this method is going to have to shove a hose up their ass every time they drive. Nah, I'm going to stick with my booster. At least it doesn't stink!

    • @aylarivers7653
      @aylarivers7653 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao ah that just made my night .I dont know how I stumbled onto rhis video the n comments

  • @fuel-genie-systems1
    @fuel-genie-systems1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is Barry Hart from Fuel Genie Systems. We have been in business for 10 years now. We have dealers, distributors and a retail operation in Clearwater, FL. Adding hydrogen enhanced air to your engine does indeed work. The added hydrogen gasses lean the mixture (lean = less gas more air) and allows the flash combustion to take place after TDC. This improves engine efficiency 30-45% depending on the stroke of the pistons. What's not generally knows is the chemistry taking place in the generator and in the combustion chamber. The hydrogen generators which have their cores immersed in electrolytic solution, produce H3O+ (mistakenly called hho). Our air is 80% nitrogen. When you add the potassium ion to nitrogen in the combustion chamber, you get potassium nitrate. Add a little charcoal (carbon) and some sulphur and you have gun powder. Essentially, adding the enhanced hydrogen gasses to the crankcase gasses via the pcv valve, breaks those crankcase fumes down into carbon, sulphur and salts.
    Now, not only do you get improved mileage from a lean running engine, you get a boost from the liquid gun powder exploding in the cylinder.
    Normally when you run and engine in a lean configuration, it runs hotter. The super-heated steam produced from H2 and O2 expands some 87 to 93 times as the piston travels down the cylinder. This has a cooling effect and cools the exhaust gasses to below 300 degrees F. We know this because there are no NOx gasses in the exhaust and NOx gasses need 300 degree plus temps to form. There is much more to the electro-chemistry than I explain here but our new kits coming out in Sep produce a hydride rich gas mixture that increases efficiency better than any stainless steel plate systems we know of. You can see our new models at: www.fuelgeniesystems.com .

    • @CQEflash
      @CQEflash 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bollocks, another salesman trying to fool people.

    • @raymondjohn8896
      @raymondjohn8896 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your products cost as much as my car 🤣 they do look good though.

    • @fuel-genie-systems1
      @fuel-genie-systems1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@raymondjohn8896 Selling your car any time soon?

  • @anyadkurvapicsaja8577
    @anyadkurvapicsaja8577 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @petthekittyz there is an ammount of work sensor on the multijetronic engines, and there are airflow senzors. and imagine even if mechanical the engine running with more power->less throttle needed-->less gas used. Im not saying they are right, prolly not...btw quote from wiki "The throttle position sensor (TPS) reports to the computer the position of the throttle butterfly valve, which the ECM uses to calculate the load upon the engine."

  • @fourbypete
    @fourbypete 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm wondering what effect it has on the motor. If you are burning all the gas that enters the engine then won't the ecu send in more fuel because the o2 sensor would read lots of oxygen at the exhaust. Effectively it would use lots more fuel which could end up blowing the rings or valves.

    • @SamMonkulas
      @SamMonkulas 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is why every HHO kit must install ECU control unit, which "alters" the O2 reading by adding Voltage between 0.1 to 0.5v and hence controls the O2 sensing. By installing this extra Electronics, your computer is basically "doped" and receives the signal that O2 in emission gas is OK. This part is not very complicated but only those who can understand can manage it. There are good Brains everywhere in the world, who can figure out things, you just have to find the right ones.

    • @fourbypete
      @fourbypete 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Untill they make a kit that just works with my Jeep, I'll have to wait.

    • @veteranheavyequipmechanic4990
      @veteranheavyequipmechanic4990 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SamMonkulas there is a controller available that wires into your MAF sensor and you tell the MAF you're taking in less dense air so it will back the fuel off, however not every car will require it. I did one on a Blazer and his mileage improved about 10mpg at time of installation, then over 3 weeks he saw his gains diminish back to normal so we installed the controller, I did one on my Honda and Suburban and my gains never diminished.

    • @veteranheavyequipmechanic4990
      @veteranheavyequipmechanic4990 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You're O2 sensors aren't measuring fuel they're measuring oxygen, a lean burn will have excess oxygen in the exhaust which will turn the fuel up, a rich burn, which is what HHO creates by adding in extra fuel, will have low oxygen content and turn the fuel down

  • @csnipper524
    @csnipper524 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    BTW just out of curiousity, what is this idea that it would take so much energy to create the 12 volts needed to power the HOD system? Your car is creating this power so long as it is running anyway, so are you saying that using it instead of letting it go to waste will decrease your fuel efficiency?

    • @devilyn76
      @devilyn76 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Chris Paul No... what they are saying is that obtaining hydrogen from water is very energy intensive... the minuscule amount of H you would get from 12v wouldn't do a thing... it takes MUCH more electricity to get any useable amount of H... In these systems they use that same water for 1000s of miles before they change it out, yet they think it's still working. It's not even like they turn all the water to H either. If you noticed, he didn't even tell you how much water he converted ...

    • @quantumleap359
      @quantumleap359 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Devilyn Exactly. The average person has no idea how inefficient a hydrogen electrolysis generator is. And how very little energy is gained by burning that hydrogen in a very inefficient internal combustion engine. It's all a bullshit scam to sell hydrogen generators to suckers.

  • @vol1prophet
    @vol1prophet 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    without a proper retune your ECU will adjust after a certain amount of cycles.

    • @jeksdad5979
      @jeksdad5979 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      With better combustion you will need less fuel, hence the increase in MPG

  • @FullMetalTuna
    @FullMetalTuna 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you would have to do a drive with the vehicle creating Hydrogen and oxygen gas but not using it. then a drive while using it. to see how much gas you are wasting to produce the gas.

  • @dominicsawin6877
    @dominicsawin6877 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Learned how to pump gas nice

  • @Wayneman1234
    @Wayneman1234 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    I m sorry you are not ignorant, and I very much apologise. I guess I have been working with this for so long that I have ssen nothing but good results. I personally have 53 cars in the POrtland area I have installed these units in and never a complaint. the least I got was 2 mpg more, and the most was a 89% increase on a chrysler sebring. I does work, enough that i will keep doing and helping people beat this B.S. fuel prices.
    again I am sorry. take care and good luck!.
    Wayneman

  • @whiteshadow247
    @whiteshadow247 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anyone have a place to read/watch a full guide on how to make this and instal from start to finish?

  • @jb-ik8sj
    @jb-ik8sj 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did u install any of computer manipulating devices or just run the hho gas into a vacuum line?
    Thanks

  • @markaylott1780
    @markaylott1780 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't think it's worth it, here's why; I tried this in my 1996 Holden frontera, a 2ltr engine in a 1730kg 4wd and done my test over 200 kilometres both suburban and highway driving. I had 2 MAJOR problems; the first is it put a hell of a load on my battery, especially at night and more so with my high beam and driving lights on, the car has a 125 amp alternator, over long periods of use it will either kill your battery or burn out the alternator or both. The second MAJOR problem was it played havoc with the O2 sensor in the exhaust and created rough running. Other problems included fast consumption of the water being "fractured", having to fill a litre jar 4 times in that 200 kilometres. If you take hydrogen out of water and what's left? Oxygen, which while it helps the fuel burn, again gives erratic readings at the O2 sensor causing more rough running. Did it work and is it worth it? Yes, it did work but not as much as claimed and I don't think it's worth doing unless you can get you engines ECU calibrated to accept hydrogen which is a huge task unless you can make your own ECU. Concidering the unknowns and the possible damage it will probably cost you more than you save in fuel.

  • @felixaudet5860
    @felixaudet5860 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These generators makes soooo little gas that the O2 sensor can't see the difference in AFR. That may be the only benefit of this design. As long as the results are there, I'm all for it. Would it work the same on another vehicle?

    • @carlsmith4767
      @carlsmith4767 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a 2001 Tacoma base model 2.4L RWD, it has a HHO system, and I can't tell you miles per gallon, but what I can tell you is when it needed a new clutch the dealership went crazy. Called me up to come pickup my truck, when I got there the trans was in the bed of the truck. They said it was too dangerous to work on. So, I told them they took the trans out the least they could do is put it back in with the new clutch just like we had agreed on, well its been 10 years and the truck now has hundred and three thousand miles and I have no clue how much I 'has save from the HHO.

  • @henrypinkham8614
    @henrypinkham8614 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What do you say to the guys who have put up video's that "debunk" this?

  • @anyadkurvapicsaja8577
    @anyadkurvapicsaja8577 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @petthekittyz you know there are couple of sensors that go to the ecu wich defines the ammount of gasoline given by the injectors?so if for any reason the car is acelerating faster then usual the computer will use less gasoline to power it.ex: wind pushing you from the back,you fuel consumption lowers.ecu measures oxygen intake,rpm,heat of the engine,co output and the "stres" level of the engine and calculates precise gas need to respond to the ammount of throttle you are applying

  • @gregsmith8032
    @gregsmith8032 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The one thing it also is making is oxygen so we have a ratio of 14: the rest is nitrogen so any improvement in oxygen like 20 30 % complete combustion is possible and more efficient a Winn Winn is all a plus it’s the computer adjusting for a lean condition that foils the tru gains but older vehicles and ones with carbs and Diesel engines make a huge gain because less furl is needed for same power output

  • @nicksflixworld
    @nicksflixworld 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Agreed, however if the system was hooked up to a separate deep cell battery that was solar charged then would it not work? This would provide free HHO gas to the engine without consuming the energy from the alternator.

    • @jeksdad5979
      @jeksdad5979 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      A proper running charging system puts out more than what is needed to run the auto or to be stored.

  • @qhack
    @qhack 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    You notice that he uses the claimed EPA mileage instead of doing an actual mileage test at the beginning. Between my brother and I, we have put HHO on 6 different vehicles. Results??? Not one got better gas mileage. It sounds good, but it doesn't work!

  • @jarr5648
    @jarr5648 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can one tune the ecu for Hho?
    Being as the less fuel readings by MAF or O2 sensors will eventually make it send more fuel thinking it’s running lean….

  • @sidvicioux
    @sidvicioux 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    here's the problem i have. the fuel pump. its going to pump the programed quantity of fuel. the only way mileage can be improved is if less gasoline is being burned. how is this occurring? assume the h2 allows for a more complete burn of a given volume of gas - how is the vehicle aware of this? the o2 systems, fuel trims, etc., aren't going to react to pump less fuel, i don't think. the throttle response isn't offset and diminished by the inclusion of h2 as far as i can tell. so how does the vehicle know that, "hey, we got h2 in here with us, so we don't need to send as much gas to the plugs". . . . ? the engine doesn't actually directly measure burn efficiency. the measurements are indirect.

    • @timjonson5763
      @timjonson5763 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If your car 1996 and up you can use Volo chip for hho, this chip will adjust your computer in car and ignition also for hho.
      P S you can install Volo chip only for cars with OBD2 .

  • @SolarPoweredSteve
    @SolarPoweredSteve 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    well i got one with a mason jar base, and what he told me to do was add some alcohol to lower the freezing easily

  • @uncrunch398
    @uncrunch398 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    My browser blocked the connection with a 'connection not secure' message.

  • @Fstop5.6
    @Fstop5.6 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m confused, is this a fuel replacement or merely a supercharger that replaces the air intake with hydrogen? One video I just watched made it seem that the gas was replaced by the HHO while this one appears to be added as a supplemental fuel.

    • @whiteshadow247
      @whiteshadow247 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It does not replace your fuel. It increases the efficiency in which your fuel burns.

  • @jimmypiaz1963
    @jimmypiaz1963 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    it's funny the hydrogen on demand or any of those hydrogen generators in cars only seem to work for the people on the internet.

    • @OlavAlexanderMjelde
      @OlavAlexanderMjelde 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +jimmypiaz1963 who isnt on the internet? ;)

    • @jonnyclueless
      @jonnyclueless 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I am not on the internet.

  • @homerunhita12
    @homerunhita12 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    right. anyone with a high school chemistry education can make a unit capable of producing adequate hydrogen levels to sustain a running car engine.

  • @danallen3510
    @danallen3510 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can’t seem to get this website, is it still ok.

  • @heraldbard
    @heraldbard 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    50 MPG seems to be standard in the UK

    • @alfsmith4936
      @alfsmith4936 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most diesels will do that or more easily. The smaller engine petrol cars are the worst in the U.K because you have to thrash them to keep up with traffic.

  • @jackl7731
    @jackl7731 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You know be nice if you get the vehicle running on 100% on a HHO gas

    • @Alwaysbusy300
      @Alwaysbusy300 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes u can but the energy on the spark needs to be changed

  • @estebanbarqueron592
    @estebanbarqueron592 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The link dont work.

  • @MathewsGeorgeP
    @MathewsGeorgeP 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just so you know.. Using unapproved fuels in vehicles on federal highways is an offense. I came to know about it from a friend who used to make home made bio diesel.

    • @brianparent
      @brianparent 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There was a garage that was actually doing the same thing converting people's cars and trucks. Heck, Jack Nicholson's car ran on water. Same concept back in 1967. CBC News shared that video article. There was also a man that converted his entire farm to run on water as well.

  • @russ549
    @russ549 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Imagine a gas/ekectric/hydrogen hybrid.............like a prius with this hydrogen add on....? But people think tesla is such a big deal. Maybe fully electric would be better but without a renewable source to charge a fully electric car there actually worse for the environment

  • @ChristianMcDonough
    @ChristianMcDonough 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wait, so how do I fill up my gas tank? i got really confused with the whole "putting the nozzle into the tank part." Usually, I just pour into the radiator.

  • @GoGetBlissed
    @GoGetBlissed 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video finally answered the question but the anticipation was killing me! haha. Thank you!

  • @neilgallv
    @neilgallv 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually, it's comes up to 29.5 if you round the number.

  • @eckyhen
    @eckyhen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where the hell does he get 66% improvement from? He only tested his mileage with the device fitted so where does he get the "without" figure from.

  • @crownether579
    @crownether579 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the video from a native of DRM, NC.

  • @desertman300
    @desertman300 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I recently bought a single core fuel kit from core fuel group, what do you think about it in general? I'm going to install it on my 06 Prius and the company told me all you need is a vacuum switch and it would be perfect, so I guess I'm a bit worried that its a scam and it wont work, if you can help me with anything that would be great. thanks

    • @2009glories
      @2009glories 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did this work for you? Are you still using the core fuel kit?

  • @motocross90
    @motocross90 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi.
    Did you have to install any electronics like a Chip or Efie to adjust a A/F?

  • @kayebair9417
    @kayebair9417 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is your guess to the best kit or system?

  • @nynephillips830
    @nynephillips830 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What does your system look like?

  • @VictoryMC
    @VictoryMC 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    No voice.. I hear the music at start and the Explorer engine turn over but nothing else. Energy companies are at it again?

  • @HHO4ALL
    @HHO4ALL 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    I guess anywhere you go, you will find people that will criticize others work rather than try it for themselves. It just shows how ignorant they really are!
    I'm so sick of people that think they know everything, because they read it in a book.
    The scientists that wrote the books thought out of the box and were probably not accepted in the scientific mainstream.
    Their laws and theories are only results based on their tests. They simply reached the limit of what they could prove at that time.

  • @bxbmbr766
    @bxbmbr766 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Are you still doing this? Who is watching this in 2022

    • @JyRarregoce
      @JyRarregoce ปีที่แล้ว

      I think hydrogen on demand is something they don’t want you to discover as it kills the hydrogen mega plants plans that they have and of course, you’ll be the enemy. Because why not? Hydrogen on demand only requires filtered water. The cell when built with the proper metals doesn’t get compromised as quick as with regular iron plates. So yes, people are still looking into this

  • @gregsbest
    @gregsbest 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can anyone tell me , why his web-site does not work when you request more info. >>>>??????

  • @ericf7063
    @ericf7063 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This sounds great! But does anyone know how running hydrogen will effect the emission control computer? The last time I had my car smogged, the guy told me at what mileage my battery died and at what mileage the sensors re stabilized. It's like everything is hooked into everything else. Yes, he told me your car can fail smog based on sensor "irregularities" rather than just emissions.

    • @zap_collection6511
      @zap_collection6511 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Find a forum specific to your car. I haven't added hydrogen to my system yet, still doing research, but I have modified the intake and exhaust pathways to increase mpg (albeit slightly - not worth it financially).
      I was throwing codes for emissions. The fix was as simple as adding an extender to the o2 sensor on the exhaust pipe.
      Every year during winter I'll still throw codes for a misfire on cylinder 4, even though there is definitely no misfire. But when I start the car and it's below ~45 degrees or the humidity was just right the day before, I'll pop a code. Goes away on it own after a few key cycles, or can be reset with a scan tool and doesn't return until the conditions are right again

    • @errornull390
      @errornull390 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just take it off and run it back in gas for a few miles then smog it then put it back on lol

  • @clarkfluegel6875
    @clarkfluegel6875 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Website is gone, no results anywhere. What happened?

  • @lordrichard8184
    @lordrichard8184 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It makes me sad that your first gen with a v8 gets better mpg then my 4th gen with a v6. I’m right around 12-13 mpg. And maybe 16 if I’m doing highway driving. My father in law has a 3rd gen with the v6 (same power train) and he gets like 20 highway. Not sure why does nerfed the mpg so badly on the 4th gens

  • @baggie00001
    @baggie00001 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have to visit the same gas station.Park at the same pump.Put the nozzle in the same hole in your car.
    Just to make sure, you should wear the same shirt,pants and socks. Also wake up at the same time and eat the same breakfast.Make sure you also take a dump at the same time and in the same place.

  • @grannysvids
    @grannysvids 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    were o2 enhancers used on this vehicle?

  • @forfunmx
    @forfunmx 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    1) 4cil 2ltr engine uses 2,000 ltrs of air per minuteat 2000rpm
    2ltrs x 2000rpms / 2 = 2000ltrs of air per min
    3 or 6 ltrs per min of hho wont do s...
    2) hho alone inside an engine contracts (implodes) into h2o (water) doesnt explode like gas therefore 4 stroke engines will not work on hho alone
    SPREAD THE WORD!!
    if you want to know more just let me know

  • @TheCraney15
    @TheCraney15 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does the install have a efie?

  • @sameerajgaonkar23
    @sameerajgaonkar23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Horrible designed HHO.
    IT requires only 1.8to 2 volts split the water ...you gave 6 times more ..that's 600% losses ....if you add 7 plate dry kit ...check itbout

  • @Ferquan69
    @Ferquan69  15 ปีที่แล้ว

    Okay, MG, I've heard everything you're saying about 100 times. So, if you are convinced that the idea is absolute hogwash, then fine, don't worry about it. I'm cool with you not believing it, okay? Of course, I would THINK that a reasonable person would want to know if it can work, rather than just ridicule it. But, if you don't want to know, no problem. I guess NASA, Purdue University and Tennesse Tech College (to name a few) are just dillusional. Thanks for the props on the music.

  • @ДжоФренцис
    @ДжоФренцис 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi there, i was wondering if you are still selling these equipments, and how can i contact you

  • @techandroid1258
    @techandroid1258 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thx for the video. Can you show us how to install it in the car

  • @petthekittyz
    @petthekittyz 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @anyadkurvapicsaja Do you work on cars, because im familiar with those sensors and how they work.
    the only thing that could be somewhat interpreted as a load sensor is going to be the valves in an automatic transmission that control when it shifts.

  • @cmdrimmortalhegemon2524
    @cmdrimmortalhegemon2524 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It can and will... It's a new tech that will require study...

  • @MsAbbydo
    @MsAbbydo 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually people this can change what our vehicles consume ( fuel wise). Think about it, if you had an electric car and you were out in the middle of no where and there was no water to be found And you had water in your car, this could be used to spin a small wheel inside of a system like a wind turbine and then it can rotate a drive shaft to produce electricity to power your car and it can recharge the batteries on the go. So think about it before you post a dumb comment on your part.

  • @KentBey
    @KentBey 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting ........ gas saving techniques and new gas pumping techniques.

  • @grannysvids
    @grannysvids 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks mate, that helped a lot.
    i have had this audio problem before, now i know how to fix it.

  • @BluefuelSystemsH2ogas
    @BluefuelSystemsH2ogas 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fred why you are doing this ........you have no surface what so ever .....what production can you achieve with that tinny stainless steel wire ???? you are doing a big damage to this technology

  • @BruceSheffler
    @BruceSheffler 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    We Need to explore all options

  • @1967Affe
    @1967Affe 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can I use a VOLVO V70 (2.5L) 1999 for this unit?

    • @jounijussila9701
      @jounijussila9701 ปีที่แล้ว

      Det finns en Svensk som har skapats sådan till sin Volvo. Kommer bara inte ihåg hans namn, tyvärr.

  • @Bigshoots86
    @Bigshoots86 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    why don't they a use a 4 banger and see if it works well?.....

  • @phenamenol
    @phenamenol 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    thought he would have filled up then see how far the tankful would have carried him .....

  • @jethrow243
    @jethrow243 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    17 with an explorer ... wow ive never heard anyone claim that b4

  • @HHOhybridBuilder
    @HHOhybridBuilder 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice presentation. I'll check it out myself.

  • @BabyYoda5555
    @BabyYoda5555 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is pretty cool but I am assuming that this sort of device would void your manufacturer warranty.

    • @dctfaz
      @dctfaz 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ever hear of the Magnusson Moss warranty act?

    • @BabyYoda5555
      @BabyYoda5555 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +David Ho I have not heard of that. My assumption came from when I asked my dealer about installing a oil catch can in my car. I was told that any modifications to the engine voids the manufacturer warranty. Is that not true?

    • @psyberiusblack
      @psyberiusblack 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm thinking that an Explorer with 167k miles on it is probably already out of warranty...

  • @steverael3474
    @steverael3474 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    does it work on diesel trucks

  • @luketamblyn9062
    @luketamblyn9062 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did you biuld you on demand hho genrator

  • @davidbeppler3032
    @davidbeppler3032 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I just pray for 10 min before starting my car every day. I have never paid for gas since I accepted Elon into my heart.

    • @DaveWard-xc7vd
      @DaveWard-xc7vd 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I drive a 2015 Nissan Leaf. I have forgotten what gas smells like.

    • @DieterSoegemeier
      @DieterSoegemeier 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You still paying for it but you now have on your electric bill

  • @elliottclark5415
    @elliottclark5415 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would really like to try this on one of my Corvettes. I am going to research the how to.

    • @solomon-uu5xh
      @solomon-uu5xh 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The HHO unit he showed is so tiny I doubt it would have any benefit. You need to use a larger unit with stainless steel plates. Make sure you condition the plates correctly for maximum HHO production. Personally I believe a wet cell system is better because they are easier to make, less complicated & easier to service.

  • @gingerbread2875
    @gingerbread2875 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    A simple exauhst CAM LOBE modification is all that's needed to regain the 80% losses going into the exaust sytem on the start of each compression stroke.
    THE EXAUHST VALVES ARE SECRETLY MADE TO BE CRACKED OPEN FOR 1° into the compression stroke this allowing the exauhst to venturi most of the fuel air mixture out before being compressed.

  • @jgbelmont
    @jgbelmont 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mythbusters disproved this also. It takes battery energy.

    • @bertbeaulieu5448
      @bertbeaulieu5448 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was thinking the same thing. Measure battery voltage before and after test

    • @JyRarregoce
      @JyRarregoce ปีที่แล้ว

      You’ll need to go directly to the alternator. Also, you don’t need to produce massive amounts of hydrogen in order for you to have efficiency results.

    • @jgbelmont
      @jgbelmont ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JyRarregoce Inaccurate.

  • @djc2152
    @djc2152 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That tiny fuel cell does not have enough output to double MPG. Sorry!