Destiny Reacts - r/twoXChromosomes
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
- Date Streamed: 10/12/2021
Follow Destiny
►Destiny - / destiny
►LNOD - / @lastnightdestiny
►Bestiny - / bestiny
►STREAM - www.destiny.gg/...
►DISCORD - discordapp.com...
►REDDIT - / destiny
►INSTAGRAM - / destiny
►MERCH - shop.destiny.gg/
![เปิดใจ พี่ญา คนรุม หลังทัวร์ลง หนักสุดในชีวิต!! l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2-OJZRtclro/mqdefault.jpg)
wait till he finds out about r/FemaleDatingStrategy LMFAO
Such a shame the femcel sub went the way of the dodo, it was even crazier.
PLEASE no
Or r/trollthexchromosome
Femcels are real
in australia, you can drink when underage with parental/guardian consent at home or at a licensed venue, but it is also at the discretion of the venue, they can still say no i dont want to serve a minor alcohol even if it is legal to do so
Women complaining about how their men not doing enough for them emotionally yet still choose to marry them. squadW
Almost like they don’t choose based off important variables 🤔
If a woman is complaining about her man not being emotional enough maybe she needs to recognize that what shes looking for is a woman.
@@crushinnihilism but high salary women dont date down
@@crushinnihilism Oh come on this is just cringe
@@xXWorldgamefunXx you my friend need to go eat some grass. Be in the real world.
Nurses usually know when babies are born with NAS (Neonatal abstinence syndrome-drugs usually) The poor babies are tense and jerky from withdrawal and cry when they should be sleeping. It’s literally the sadest thing to see. They are required by law to report this to CPS in most states but if a drug test comes back negative for both mom and baby there is nothing they can do.100% they should be charged.
What if the woman was in treatment (say she goes to a methadone clinic or something similar), and tries her hardest to stay sober, but the baby is still born with issues that let's stipulate are not typical of methadone treatment (or whatever treatment) alone. Let's also stipulate that the clinic has records that show she went to the clinic every day as she was supposed to and was otherwise compliant (meaning she went to all her scheduled group and individual counseling appointments, etc), and that she was simply not able to get completely off the drug in time before she had the baby. Should she still be punished, if she's trying her hardest to do the right thing and simply falls short?
I would argue that that is a very different situation, because I think there is value in recognizing the fact that addiction is a chronic illness that people simply do not choose, and hence the addicted person's ability to simply stop using drugs is not like this on/off switch you can hit once you realize you are pregnant, nor should we expect people to be able to do so. This is why Destiny's analogy doesn't work; a pregnant addict can't just stop using out of nowhere both because of withdrawals and because like i said, it isn't a simple decision like the decisions you make while driving.
@@badsocks756 wouldn't evading pregnancy or getting an abortion be a better alternative than rehabilitation if the recreational drug is inhibiting fetal growth to the point of miscarriage?
Ah. I visited that subreddit today. It felt like AIDS :(
4:56 in WI the drinking laws are pretty ridiculous. A fucking 14 year old can drink at a bar if a parent is there and okay with it. But theres no legal way you can drink between the ages of 18-21 because your parent isnt a legal guardian anymore
Nah In practice they'll let parents buy their 18yo a drink. Source: went to college in Wisconsin.
@@mason8787 oh yeah in practice most places dont care, its Wisconsin lol. But the law is really fucking weird still
Your drug laws are pretty harsh and whacky too
@@Twistedhippy I'm not very familiar with our drug laws but i can assume they're probably pretty harsh
@@samthemessiah9330 A parent can give their children alcohol in their own domicile, church wine etc.
It varies by state on where a guardian may purchase an alcoholic beverage for a minor. Connecticut, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, Ohio, Texas, Wisconsin, Wyoming are all states that allow businesses to serve minors with guardian approval.
2x standards. Women can ve mysandrist
The Entire Subreddit needs to Shut down, It’s a cancer on Humanity.
@@Imthesoulofthes Look man I hate twox (not for reasons that are specific to that sub I just hate reddit in general) but this is way too far. Compared to some other forums misandry TwoX is honestly pretty weak
This video is so. fucking. salient. that it hurts. This is speaking truth to power ✊
Nope if you think a fetus isn't human no one should get charged for killing it. Can't have it both ways.
A fetus is "human" it just isn't a person yet.
The point isn't what he thinks but rather that if someone's going to get charged for killing a fetus, then so should a parent that does so intentionally.
If I'm making ice cream. But it's not ice cream yet. And then you come kick my ice cream machine over ruining my ice cream. I think it's fair to accuse you of ruining my ice cream even if it wasn't technically ice cream yet, because I had every intention of letting it become ice cream sometime in the future
@@samuelmorkbednarzkepler you didn't really need to use a weird ice cream analogy. Wanting to keep a baby vs aborting it would have been just fine.
@@nsaylor9 the analogy works fine. There's nothing weird about it and I have no idea why you would choose to describe it that way. It's just an ice cream analogy, it's not that deep dude. Stop picking at points that are completely irrelevant to the discussion
Here for the toxicity
lol I thought the name was supposed to mean "double chromosomes", like an ablest subreddit where they post people with down syndrome doing weird shit. I guess I wasn't far off.
Saying PickMeGirls went away in 2013 is a bit of a stretch thats all their communities are now
FDS user detected
@@MrFram FDS?
"Pick me" has lost it's meaning ages ago. Now it just means a woman who disagrees with other women on any topic, it doesn't even have to be about men.
I think what he meant is that women are more accepted in gaming spaces now, back in the day so many female gamers shit relentlessly on other women, especially tiddy streamers who did gaming. It was only when a lot of women started gaming channels after the rise of Pewdiepie and Markiplier we saw more regular women coming into the hobby with respect for other women.
Pickme doesn't work as an insult anyway because, unlike simps, pickme girls usually get the most attention from men
I haven't read much of 2xchromosomes, but from what I've read it really doesn't seem as bad as it does in this video. r/FemaleDatingStrategy is so much worse imo.
Fds is insane but every day 2x turns more extreme
Most posts are okay but the top ones. They're all fucking trash bro. There was some shit about a girl in like Pakistan or something and arranged or forced marriage and the girl had killed like her spouses whole family and every comment was basically trying to justify the killings
As hateable as it is, I am thankful as it was one of the things that brought me from going down to incel-dom. I was browsing reddit and read a few stories from there, kinda going on autopilot from things like tifu and especially subreddits that were about entitled people. By time I realise what sub im on (it was auto followed) I have already read and had empathy for women in the story.
From what I've seen I agree. There is the occasional dud like the street fighter one but most of the posts seem like women just venting about particular things that make being a woman suck. Like having to worry about half the population naturally being stronger than you enough to pin you down with little to no effort and it's terrifying if you think of it that way.
@@wildpjah yeah but thier vaginas give them mind control powers over men so it balances out.
destiny is right unban the incel sub so we can have parity
Imagine thinking that women have hobbies smh
I can't believe destiny has the audacity to drink redbull when rockstar blue raspberry exists
Bang is better
@@BigSeanH every bang I've had is sugar free and sugar free energy drinks hit worse
@@smittyflufferson1299 Sugar is bad for you
@@BigSeanH not as bad as rationalizing how artificial sweeteners are better
@@smittyflufferson1299 Sugar is worse for you than sucralose.
Another channel to consooooooooooooooom Destiny's content
This subreddit has been on top for a while now. Read more posts I swear
If a guy is driving his pregnant gf around, they get into a small accident and it causes her to miscarriage. Should he be charged with manslaughter?
If there's an evidence that he drove carelessly
no
How far gone is the gestation?
No he should be given an award.
@4:15 I don't think killing other people's lifeforms has to have the same penalty as killing your own lifeforms. Like if you have a pet chicken and I kill it that's illegal, but if you kill your own chicken and eat it that's fine.
Because other lifeforms are seeing as property/resources, no different than a chair.
Now humans we dont have ownership over (unless there is some country with slavery yet)
We can be the guardian/responsible for our chieldren, but their not realy "our"
You don't own your child, they're not property. The chicken comparison makes no sense...
@@Speakeazi your fetus is not your child. Fetus is your property, or body . So it's a thing you own either way.
@@colinbruulsema7177 A fetus is your property? Precisely at what point is the fetus no longer your property?
@@Speakeazi cells are your property? At precicely what point can we not liberate your eggs from your body?
Sooooo… does a man (or woman for that matter) be encouraged to ignore their impatience or discomfort when they are bothered by someone? I mean, why should I be expected to stop what I’m doing just to keep you from being upset that I didn’t talk to you?
With how long Destiny has been in the game here, I don’t know how he doesn’t understand this. Don’t encourage men or women to bother people whenever they want. Different perspectives are sometimes worth looking at
This is exactly why I don't speak to anyone in real life and operate in an automaton-like stupor while in public
6:20 QFT
I got banned from this sub once because I said ghosting should treated as sexual assault. Apparently the sub thoroughly believes it is rape, so I got -700 votes before I got banned for defending rape. Literally, my comment was
"I agree, ghosting is terrible, though I think twenty years might be a bit too over the top for something that might happen on accident or because of poor communication. I think one to five years, like with serious sexual assault, is more the range of prison time I think is fair."
In response to someone calling for twenty to twentyfive years in prison for ghosting (removing the condom during sex).
I'm glad you explained it at the end. I thought ghosting was like not even opening a message from them and was super fucking confused.
If the partner does not consent to unprotected sex and only consents to it under the pretense of protection and you remove that protection, I genuinely find it to be a breach of consent and therefore rape. I'd be open to hearing another argument though.
@@ReverendLeRoux
The thing about rape is that there has to be force involved/unwillingness to engage in the act of sex. Rape by definition is having intercourse with someone against their will. While taking a condom off mid sex is a crappy thing to do, that isn't rape.
Rape has connotations that inherently imply a lack of agency or choice. You could argue that taking off the condom without letting one side know that you haven't fits the latter, but that still wouldn't be forced intercourse. It's admittedly a dubious technicality, but that's how I see it.
This is probably a bad example, but it's like a kid stealing a gift their parent bought for them before Christmas. It's bad that they did it, but it's not theft since it is technically theirs anyway. It's a breach of trust for them to go in it when they're told not to, but it still wouldn't be theft.
If a woman actively and willingly chooses to sleep with a man, then there cannot possibly be rape in any sense involved since she still chose to have sex.
This however doesn't mean their shouldn't be consequences for breaching someone's trust, though. Taking off a condom without telling is still a reprehensible thing to do.
@@utopian4769 if you have sex under the pretense that protection would be used and then remove that agreement mid way without the consent of both parties, it is altering the agreement beyond the grasp of consent and therefore meets the definition of rape.
@@ReverendLeRoux
But if both of the parties in question agreed to have sex to begin with, then it can't be rape. There was no coercion and/or force involved. There were boundaries set(which should be abided by), but no one was actively resisting or denying advances.
@@utopian4769 thats not how that works at all. Consent is both given and maintained with a certain degree of understanding. You can consent to protected sex but not to unprotected sex at the same time, which means slipping the condom off is a breach of trust that violates the terms of consent, making it rape. Not to mention that consent can be withdrawn at literally any time.
squadW
Woah wtf? Destiny thinks it’s fine to jail someone for a miscarriage? What if she’d eaten food she knew might be off, or slipped because she chose not to wear safe footwear for snowy weather?
So a woman could be raped and suddenly loses the right to make decisions about her own body? Insane. Absolutely insane.
Nah, don’t think that’s it at all. Idk the details of the case he reacted to, but I saw one a while back of a woman that planned to keep the kid, but was doing meth and heroine. She miscarried and was charged for it. It’s a lot different if the woman was raped or planned to abort, but when you are actively trying to bring a life into the world while doing things you know would harm it’s growth severely it is different.
Nice strawman
You seem to be experiencing psychosis.. You are reacting to stimuli which are not of this earth.
@@saulkid7232 You don'T have to repeat Destiny terms lol It's not that hard to show how flawed his resoning is without using ''psychosis''
@@olivierdevries6543 its a joke dude chill