This might be one of my favorite episodes in our history. See you live tomorrow and in Footnotes next week. Thanks for watching, and a HUGE thanks to *Dr. John R Hutchinson* check out his work here: t.co/dc3acyVmSO - KH
Because Science your amazing Kyle!!! How could a human survive an experiment like Wanda maxximoff and quicksilver and eleven from stranger things? Thanks
Excuse me? What about Power Rangers and their DINOSAUR ROBOTS that came out before the original Jurassic Park movie? Doesn't that get some credit for dinosaurs being part of pop culture?
Because Science Could you please do an episode of because science on spinosaurus versus Tyrannosaurus rex For several reasons : 1) they didn’t even exist at the same time . 2) they weren’t even on the same continent 3) Spinosaurus jaw was made to eat fish 4) and would have been far too weak to bite at Tyrannosaurus rex neck and fling it 10 feet away I understand that the movie Jurassic Park III put it in there for entertainment value but people on TH-cam are talking about it like they could be some believability to this so could you please, I’m begging please rectify this Yours truly an avid watcher of your channel by the way I remember when you had shorthair thanks much Richard Parks
Thank God I watched this before hiking! This actually saved my life, as I ran in to a T-Rex at the national forrest. I used a combination of running around trees and stabbing the beast in the legs with my knife. Took some time. But I would have been clueless if it wasn't for these great tips. Thanks!
@@rioajipangestu776 Does not change the fact that its attacks are multiplicatively stronger. Even one of those will maul you to death. It is about nearly as big as a motorcycle and and more agile than a leopard.
probably one of the most dangerous point during your attack is at the moment of it falling. its feet will probably kick out dramatically and since you are most likely near those, it would be one hell of a drop kick.
it would flail sure, but the mass denotes that it would do it slowly. like when moving its legs to chase its pray. its slow and bumbling. We would easily be able to out maneuver it if up close. now imagine being equipped with the same equipment landscapers who trim palm trees use. you would pierce skin and be able to climb the T Rex gouge and cut it without it being able to reach you. only a matter of time before it bleeds out and dies bitch ass T Rex :D
Ian Cornell *he doesn't say "damn" *it's "scientists"(plural) *"were"(not we're) *"whether or not they" ... Here's the complete quote; "Yeah, yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn’t stop to think if they should." ... Oh & here's a link medium.com/@Lightfoot.andrew/jurassic-park-lunch-scene-where-they-all-discuss-the-possible-dangers-of-having-prehistoric-3f2e893b4619
The tail of a T-Rex was probably used to balance that massive top-weight of the animal. If so, it would also be very strong, and as you have illustrated very well (this is probably the best visualization on dinosaur size I've seen in a while) it is also incredibly long. Combining those two facts, coming up behind a T-Rex in order to mess around with its legs might be just as dangerous (if not more so) as coming at it from the front, since just one sweep with that massive tail would be enough to send you flying several feet and crush your body into paste.
Oddly, I think the T-Rex's size still plays against it. As Kyle demonstrated, the tail itself is quite high off the ground, and given the amounts of balance that such a large creature would require, I'm not sure that it could actively utilize it's tail very well against a small, low-to-the-ground target. Not that you wouldn't be smooshed with one hit. Rather, I think that the range of motion required to use the tail as a weapon beyond a little coincidental wiggle-waggle would cause enough torque to tear the Rex's hips apart. Is it a danger? Absolutely, but I definitely think it's much less "actively" dangerous than the front end.
I agree. It might still be a bit dangerous, but its probably so important to the balance of the animal that it wouldn't be able to effectively use it as any sort of weapon against something intentionally without also having to worry about tipping over itself, thus negating any effective use of it as a weapon, and more just an obstacle to avoid.
You need to think about this. Bears fight wolves. Tigers fight wild dogs. There were smaller predators that T-rex competed with and probably fought from time to time. It probably was formidable defending itself. T-rex ruled for millions of years. It was probably not as fragile as this video suggests.
Ever since I studied some engineering, I've always been extra fascinated by the massive complications dinosaurs must have dealt with to be so massive. Look at elephants, which stand more or less on their toes, and can't jump. I was a bit surprised to realize that a fall would be very lethal to the larger dinosaurs. I wonder what their fights would have been like, with their limitations in mind? If two t-rexi fought over territory, if one got knocked over, this would probably have been lethal, and if they preferred posturing more over shows of actual strength. If one good blow could mean death, it'd be a bad idea to pick fights I suppose!
Well we have healed trex skull injuries where it looks like one rex was pretty brutally wrestling the other by its head/trying to lever the top of its braincase off. So yeah trex fighting was britally dangerous
What tensile strength would you need your tripwire to have, in order for it to not snap when being exposed to a sprinting T-rex hitting it with one leg first, accelerating forward? And is this a realistic force for vines to have, since that's what would most likely be available?
A decent steal cable would probably be sufficient enough to not snap, but your would have to tie it to something that it wouldn't also just break or somehow come lose from. Though we are talking about something that is exceptionally top heavy, so just a small force applied to unbalance it would probably be enough to accomplish the task even if it did come loose or break in the process.
Also it could break, all it has to do is cause a misstep breaking the stride and causing momentum to topple the beast. The balance point is so precise any disruption could be catastrophic.
An arresting cable from an aircraft carrier, like the Eisenhower CVN69, should work just fine without snapping. As Kyle said in the video, T-Rex would be lucky to "sprint" at all. So you would only have to topple it's mass at 11mph. Which is made easier by it being extremely top heavy.
steel cables or even a regular heavy duty chain would be about in the ballpark. like kyle said its top heavy and might be easy to tip over. so even if the chain snapped in half it would probably have been enough to make the T-rex lose its footing and likely trip it giving you plenty of time to try and cut the heels or run even further.
Michael Berthelsen You would certainly need to wrap it around several times which means it would be visible and easily stepped over. But if you can figure out the whole time travel thing you could probably figure out high to take some strong yet hard to see wiring back with you; or an elephant gun. 🤣
"The Tyrannosaurus Rex is held up as the most fearsome and ferocious predator to ever walk this Earth, and it's true," says a member of the species singularly responsible for the extinction of countless other species.
@@justsomejerseydevilwithint4606 Virus: infective agent that typically consists of a nucleic acid molecule in a protein coat, is too small to be seen by light microscopy, and is able to multiply only within the living cells of a host. Predator: an animal that naturally preys on others. We are predators
A big factor that Kyle forgot to mention is that T-Rex's are both predators and scavengers. They likely sought very large prey, given hint to by the overkill that their bit force would have against smaller animals like ourselves. The articulation of movement a T-Rex posses is so poor that if you managed to get near the rear of their feet there would be nothing that they could do to get to you. If they attempted to deliberately step on you, they would throw off their balance trying to raise their foot 2m off the ground without forward momentum. In reality a T-Rex would be easier to hunt than an Elephant due to the fact that it is reliance on its forward motion for stability, since it only has two legs as opposed to four; meaning that as soon as you were behind it, it would be helpless against you (aside from its tails random movements). One hunter in front and one behind with spears would leave the Rex with limited options, face the front person who can easily keep their distance while the rear is stabbed multiple times, turn to face the rear simply reversing the problem, or charge/flee where its maneuverability becomes limited and a fit enough couple of humans could not only keep pace but *easily* outlast the dino in a test of stamina. Hunter class humans would do incredibly well in a matchup against what movies try to tell us would be terrifying, when in reality a cougar is a significantly more dangerous threat than nearly any dinosaur that existed. T-Rex weaknesses: Slow speed up and low top speed, limited stability from being bipedal, inability to turn rapidly, inability to access areas smaller than its beak, stride length, forward heavy center of mass. We wouldn't be hunted by the T-Rex, we would be hunting T-Rex and people would be filming TH-cam videos of themselves trying to take these down with knives.
Sean Peery I bet you are one of those people that thinks they would be better off in a medieval battle without armor right? You couldn't be more wrong about trex.
though I do think that the idea of people taking out T-rex's out with knives is a bit of an exaggeration to say the least, he does have a point. These beasts were never meant to kill smaller nimble creatures, instead they went for other beasts equal, or even larger in size. this means they aren't optimised for fighting humans to say the least. For them, fighting humans would be like what for us is hitting a fly: yeah we could kill them in one hit, but that means you do have to hit them. I think a WAAAY more terrifying dinasour for us would be velociraptor, since they're in our weight class and probably have a manouvrability which would be closer to that of us. and still be able to shred us to bids in mere seconds.
T. rex could run as fast as an Olympic sprinter. And could maintain that speed over great distances. It's very likely that they also hunted juveniles as most predators living or extinct tend to avoid predating on any individual that can conceivably hurt them back. Injury to a predator is a death sentence.
true, but I do think we're talking about quadripedal juveniles which are still A LOT less manouvrable than humans are. especially in terms of rotating and sidewards movement, which is the type of movement you'd need to not get eaten. (think as in a bull fight).
Would he really? I mean, a human seems to be almost too small to be considered an "interesting" prey. Most predators don't chase after what they don't consider "worth the hassle", because they need to save their energy as most as they can - they can't afford any waste. My dinosaur knowledge is extremely rusty, so I'm honestly curious. Wouldn't it be more logical for the T-Rex to just scare off small animals he's not interested in eating?
If it was realistic Mr John Hammond would be either in Prison or 50 million dollars in debt for the many deaths his creations caused. I mean if you own a pitbull and that pitbull kills a person you'll be paying the consequences, isn't it the same here?.
Well, first you need a rampant Venom symbiote (or is it symbiont?) to find a T-rex, then Cable can send you a blinged-up spear so you can save the day.
Now that I think of it Kyle Hill Is one of the strongest youtubers ive ever seen Hes survived alot of stuff in all his videos from running speeds like the flash and even SURVIVING all the draw backs of it and now this video where he shrugs off being stomped on by a trex really made me think. Hes one of the characters I expect to see in the new marvel Infinity war. Really hyped for the Kyle hill cameo
First, I wanna say I love how you included the discoveries of recent years, like it having feathers, and how good eyesight it actually had. And for my question; Do you think you could you distract it with something like a flare, or some other kind of light? Would that be effective?
The distraction should be possible, in the same way that a laser pointer works on felines. A person holding a flare-- particularly in Grant's case, where it is very dark and his physical form is obscured from the predator by heavy rainfall, shouldn't have much issue getting a predator to focus in on a flare-- a distinct oddity that could be something edible. The Rex itself is likely very unused to things like flares, and with the bright red light sparking up in the middle of a storm, it could definitely be more of a focus than the person holding it. I just want to know where that cliff came from...
CoyoteCamouflage lol for real about the cliff though. I love that movie so much as a kid (still love it) that I used to watch it a few times a week when I was like, 5. Even as a child that cliff confused me.
4:34 actually, the writter scrapped the idea out of the book before publishing it, but he had already talked with Spilberg, and they were writing the book and filming at the same time, and it was much harder to change those scenes from the movie than from the book. In the second book there is actually a guy that dies because he stays still in front of T-rex's nest, the protagonist looking from the security cameras say "he must have read an old paper that claimed T-rex had bad eye sight. It's being long disproven though.", and the T-rex cub jumps out of the nest and eat the guy.
believe it got released few months prios, but it was still under writing as it was recorded, given the writter talked with Spilberg (his friend) when it was still just an idea. Basically he asked Spilberg what he thought about it, if he should write or if no one would like to see it. Spilberg said that whichever he chose, he would make a movie about it, so the writer started developing the story while talking to Spilberg about what he had already made, both for feedback and to inform on how the movie should go. By the way, the personalities of Hammond and the Lawyear are exchanged in the movies, as well as the girl and the boy who I never remember the names.
Stephen Strange It’ll wear boots, and shin guards! In all seriousness, if you went for the ankle slicing tactic, you’d run the risk of getting squashed under its body, or hit by its tail among other things, and considering that larger specimens weighed up to 8.4 tonnes, that’s not a good thing.
KaWaWu yeah and aside from that she never 'outran' the TRex the animal was barely getting a little jog when she was doing a full on sprint. The TRex never ran so there was no 'out' running to do from her.
Also the access road she led her through was full of turns, not even close to full speed trying to manoeuvre down those back roads and through a Spinosaurus skeleton replica (I loved that part!)
Adrenaline is effectively an emergency boost for your body, 11mph is nothing when you are being chased by a T-Rex, you could probably do 20mph for about 20-30 seconds or so before your energy reserves run dry (Even then, you likely wouldn't just collapse, but you would slow down considerably, maybe to the point where rexy could make a meal out of you) Though eventually, your ATP reserves will be burned up, anaerobic glycolysis will fail due to excessive lactic acid build-up, you will "hit the wall" and down you go, right into rexys waiting maw
But we where never alive at the same time to truly take the win in terms of existence D: and the tyrannosaur species had existed in total some 15-20 million years tech speaking they still got us beat by a wide margin sadly :/ but hey there's always the bazooka option! That pretty much wins every time against most anything in nature!!!
8:25 This is why I believe ankylosaurus was the most difficult prey item for trex. One well placed swipe from that tail and if it hits the leg of tyrannosaurus, ankylosaurus could literally send trex falling to its own demise from his own weight. Not to mention, ankylosaurus armor could indeed repel at least two bites before succumbing. Triceratops is the most deadly of tyrannos prey but ankylosaurus is the hardest, pun intended, of them all.
"They didn't show a T.Rex flinging its prey and eating it." DUDE! HAVE YOU NOT SEEN JP2?! When Eddy got ragdoll/ double teamed! P.S can you do a video of whether dragons can exist and if so what requirements do these creatures must have in order to exist, plus not every species really needs to be areal or breath fire, some could be aquatic/terrestrial, they may have venom or bacteria like the Komodo, or like a T.Rex have a powerful bite, or a massive beak like the Snapping Turtle.
He actually touched that subject on a number of videos, pretty sure there's a video on fire breathing back at nerdist channel and he explained dragons in one of live streams as well as mentioning similar topic in a video about real life cupid, main problem being that they would need absurdly large wings, many times their size, and then they wouldn't be able to have strong enough muscles to use them. Even largest real life birds are very light and massive flying dragons aren't realistic. Pretty sure he did talk about Komodo at some point too though
He did touch the subject of dragons before when he did a video about whether a dragon could melt the wall from GoT. I thought he also talked about hings like wingspan and weight there, but I'm not sure.
Shadiverstity has a few good videos on fighting dragons if your interested, here is one. th-cam.com/video/U6FxChSwyJI/w-d-xo.html Highly recommend them.
MAB - Check out this video it was a lot of fun to watch. It pretends Dragons are real and how we would think they would do what we portray Dragons doing. th-cam.com/video/8FIDeOOL52Q/w-d-xo.html
I question the wisdom of using a sword against the tendons, I think an axe would be much better suited for this task. Additionally, you'd better be prepared to run once you cut the tendon, you might get hit with part of its body while it falls. Even a swipe of the tail would be like getting hit with a falling tree. I think your best bet, barring modern day weaponry would be either tripwires or a hidden trench with pikes set into the ground like a tiger trap. It would be fairly simple to make one that you could run over, but would collapse under the weight of the Tyrannosaur.
TheJeffreyJJones if it cuts the skin, doubt it’d matter what you’re using. T-Rex might be big and powerful but it’d sure as hell notice if you ram a sword point into its ankle. The trick is doing it and then getting the eff outta there whilst the monster tramples around in agony...
NotQuiteEnglish realistic it would probably trash around the second it notice something alive in it’s blind spot. Probably stomping and tail swiping before you could even get in a hit.
As for as medieval type weaponry is concerned, a sword is maximized for speed and redirection. An ax is best for impact against a hard target like wood or some poor Irishman’s shield. However an ax has a far shorter edged section making the chances of missing the target more likely. A sword, is faster and easier to get in a second strike if you miss, also less likely to miss because it has a much longer sharp edge. And against a soft target like tendons and skin, you would be able to get by with a long slicing action messing up more flesh as you go. Of course something to keep you AWAY from the big animal is even better, a good pike formation would be very useful and peppering them with arrows is better still. I’d still rather have my 45-70 elephant rifle or Barrett 50 Cal any day lol
Keep in mind that big animals are not "soft", there is a guy in sweden who fended off a moose by repeatedly axing him in the face and the moose lived. Bears can take a brutal amount of punishment before expiring, notably knifes through the skull. A leg that can withstand the full t-rex weight, plus whatever scales they have is not going to be a soft target. I would say to leave any notions of meleeing a t-rex at home. Just look at how hard it was for primitive humans hunted mammoths, and those were animals that mainly feared us, a t-rex is going to plow through a pike formation, and that's if you get anyone ballsy enough to maintain the formation against a charging t-rex, considering how much training it took to do that against a simple cavalry charge I find that unlikely. Also, while the 45-70 can certainly kill an elephant it's not an "elephant rifle". You can kill an elephant with a lot of standard rounds because it's skull has a big sinus that leads directly to the brain. A t-rex doesn't have that point where the trunk connects to the skull, it's just jaws and hard, dense bone. Also, I'm guessing that due to how they are built, a charging t-rex head would bounce and weave like a boxer during the charge, instead of staying leveled like the elephant. I would say the biggest elephant rifle would not be big enough to reliably taking down these beasts. Trapping him, like we used to do with mammoths, certainly sounds like the most sensible solution so far. And since it has scavenging habits, it would not be very hard to bait it.
On the other hand, that leg is also holding up the full weight of a T-Rex... So a successful hit to the knee joint with even a more standard rifle round level of power could well mess it up enough to cause the beast to trip. Which would be rather bad for it.
It seems strange to say it, but in many ways, I feel like the T. Rex's enormous size is its biggest weakness. When dealing with enormous creatures, it's important to remember the Square-Cube Law, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square-cube_law which in essence says that as an object grows larger, its volume will grow faster than its surface area, because surface area grows in a second power exponential relationship but volume grows in a third power exponent. So for ever two units of length you gain, surface area increases by 4 but volume increases by 8. This means that creatures get bigger and bigger, their bodies have to become proportionally stronger and have comparatively bigger bones and muscles compared to their bodies. Kyle has pointed this out previously in the episode about upper limits on the size of titans in Attack on Titan th-cam.com/video/Bewq3rXFlHE/w-d-xo.html This is why enormous animals like elephants and sauropods have such thick bones proportional to their bodies, especially in their legs. This is an example of allometric scaling en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allometry , where larger animals have to have stouter proportions to increase the cross sectional area of their bones and muscles, compared to the relatively spindly bones that small animals can get away with. The tyrannosaurus seems to exist right on the edge of what is biomechanically feasible. Its head is positively enormous, and it had to have its incredibly long tail just to counterbalance it. It's essentially just a giant mouth on legs. This means that a lot of its mass is located away from its center of gravity. Not only that, we can assume from its anatomy and estimated native range that it mainly hunted by chasing down prey on flat plains, so it wouldn't have had to maneuver very quickly. All this is to just agree with Kyle's point, that the T. Rex's huge body makes it VERY difficult for it to turn quickly, so trying to escape in an area with lots of obstacles is a good move. In fact it may be even better than Kyle suggested, because I believe that the T. Rex's enormous size would mean that it would have to be incredibly careful in close quarters like this, since perhaps its biggest threat would be itself. Attempting to turn sharply at speed would be a serious danger to its weakest point--its ankles--and colliding with a solid object could be devastating, since some of Tyrannosaurus' bones were hollow to reduce mass, and we're not sure if they had a sternum, so a collision could break several ribs. So the densely wooded part of the island where we first encounter the T. Rex might be the worst place for it to try to catch someone, and I think it would want to be careful about pulling some of the maneuvers it tries at 0:51. It's just too heavy to be careless about throwing its weight around.
I'm by no means an expert, but I don't look at that body style and think ambush predator. It's too tall, too heavy, and not compact enough. I'm sure that it would attack suddenly and is much better suited to short chases, which I suppose you could call an ambush, but I still get the sense that it had to run, and basic physics suggests that it is much better at running in a straight line. But regardless, it doesn't really change my point. From everything we can guess based on its fossils, it just seems that its body is too big to maneuver in tight spaces.
giggityguy Ambush doesn’t mean fast in the case I presented. It means to wait in a place dense or not and suddenly attack/start walking after a target. It could definitely not fit in very tight spaces but since part of its environment are forests I think he could be able to maneuver through them. (Especially the one presented in the video)
giggityguy they suggest it was an ambush predator that chased out its prey. The chased out part I can explain in detail but the ambush part is basically guess work, we know it hunted and didn’t scavenge much, we know it couldn’t sprint but we don’t know it’s patterning or how still it could stay. I mean elephants are known to be aggressive and suddenly sprint out of the woods without people knowing they even were there so it can be done.
Chris Gaming It’s a play on the Large Hadron Collider particle accelerator and Hadrosaur, aka duck billed dinosaurs like Edmontosaurus that T. rex liked to eat
For the sword option I'd use a greatsword-sized falchion, give it to my strongest guy, and have him do a wrath cut to the tendons to maximize the chance of success. For the mass of the greatsword would give the cut bite, and the edge geometry of the falchion would make it able to slice as effortlessly into flesh as your razor shaves hair. The strength of the wielder would provide lots of force and the wrath cut, focused on one powerful strike, would best focus that force on the fine razor-edge of the blade to devastate the T-Rex. Also, I's have a distraction keeping the T-Rex occupied from the puny human sneaking behind it to sever its tendons.
The biggest problem with fighting a T-Rex as a human is that most humans are in the same size range as most of the animals that T-Rexes hunted for food. We mammals were really, really tiny back then, field mouse sized or less, so that is why mammals were able to avoid getting eaten... But big ol' adult Humans now-a-days at Least 40 kg, most being much more... and that makes us perfectly snack sized for ol' Texie It would take everything we have as a human to survive such an encounter, and I think you picked the right weapons for the job! Ignoring the firearms your suggested (because that's just not fun from a thought experiment perspective), in this episode you show yourself using a Zweihänder to cut the T-Rex's Achilles Tendon, that is actually a pretty good choice of weapon. Most Zweihänders were only 2 kg (4.4 lb), and while they were really big, you could still run around with them over your shoulder with ease. The massive blade generates a LOT of cutting force when swung properly, and could probably cut through the beast's thick armor-like hide. The biggest weakness of the Zweihänder is it's lack of agility, you really only get to swing it in WIDE archs either side to side or sweeping X shaped cuts. The Zweihänder was really not used like a "Sword" at all, tactically speaking. It was closer to a Pole-Arm or Spear, and most Doppelsöldner (The dudes who carried these weapons into battle on the front lines) were put in the same formations with Pikemen and Pole-Arm users. BUT Fighting a T-Rex with a Zweihänder sort of negates all of those weaknesses for the sword! The T-Rex is a COLOSSAL target, and the wide motions you use in cutting would be effective! Slice near the face and mouth to try to discourage it from attacking you, and run near the legs to cut the Achilles Tendon. The Zweihänder is literally Designed to dominate a wide area on the battlefield, and using a BIG sword to attack a BIG target would work! Plus against a T-Rex even STABBING it with that long blade could be lethal for the animal, reaching vital organs in the belly and ribcage! All in all, good pick!
Another point tho, the environment. If it's set in modern days the T-rex would barely be able to walk as the oxygen level is way too low, and if you are in Cretaceous your physical strength would be much better too. And the best weapon would likely be an axe as I doubt the sword would have enough weight behind it to do the job, reptile skin is tough.
In Jurassic World, I calculated that Mosa was being fed about 3 tons of food per day. At that rate, it would need to eat the equivalent of one 90-ton whale every month
UFO KingJose99 in the real world, a mososaurus wouldn't actually have an impact. Sure, the largest species may have gotten up to 17 m, but you compare that to pods of killer whales that are almost that size and realize that a single reptile would eat a lot less than a family of massive mammals. Besides, we are still discovering new species of beaked whales as recent as a few years ago, so there really wouldn't be an impact on the ocean. It could definitely kill some beach goers though.
+Ds6 Prophet Velociraptor was tiny, about the size of a large Turkey. All you would have to do is kick it and a Velociraptor would go flying like a football. Utahraptor is the raptor you would have to look out for, it was 23 feet long and it weighed about as much as a polar bear.
If you want to win a fight with T-Rex run in a straight line & when it’s close to catching you make the. Sharpest turn at full speed & at full speed Tyrannosaurus aren’t built to sharp turns at there full speed. Turning at full speed will make the T-Rex fall over & hurting itself in the process. After all you could imagine a bipedal weighing in over 8-10tons could easily cause the animal to break its own leg.
Most people aren’t going to believe me but I did right down this comment. I watched the episode because as soon I’ve seen the name of the video I absolutely couldn’t help but not right it down XD
Just make sure you stay out of reach. Turning in reach it could turn its head to try getting you. I suppose it would be an interesting discussion how turning its head could upset its balance.
He plays a jazz show every Wednesday night here in LA (Rockwell Table and Stage). I've been 4 times. He's remembered me each time, taken the time to say "Because Science" with me, and is *really good* at jazz piano. Highly recommended if you're in the area. One of the best nights in LA. -- KH
It's cool that you posted this video at the same time I happened to be thinking about this very thing... see, I thought it was weird that in Jurassic park 3 the weapons that were brought to the island were ineffective... as the dude who got eaten by the spino early on was carrying a 50BMG rifle of some sort "presumably semi automatic" and a 50BMG round. Even a full metal jacket round "not armor piercing" is capable of passing through inches of steel and still possessing the force to kill a man... and I hate to say this, but the trex "or spino" do not have tungsten skulls or sternums... meaning the 50 caliber round would be able to drop a trex just like a hunting rifle drops a deer, because at the end of the day, humans bent nature to our will, and harness the chemical potential energy to throw metal rocks at several kilometers a second... and dinosaurs just aren't advanced enough to counter that
Evilmike42 regardless, I was going off what was in the film... and to be honest with you, a 30-06 would likely be enough to kill a dinosaur yes, I myself frequent the .338 as an elk rifle... however, I would still take a .50 any day of the week, because the only kill is overkill
I think the dinos we'd have most trouble fighting are medium-sized ones, approx. 4 to 8 meters long. We don't have enough strength to take them down and we won't be able to make them topple themselves effectively.
1. Okay but if you were to run with wire around it’s legs while it walked wouldn’t the force of its legs moving rip the wires out of your hand if not rip off your arms? 2. There is evidence that they ran in packs (flocks?) good luck fighting multiple T-Rex(es?) at once. Are you trying to get me killed Kyle?
Huh. I'm still skeptical of their "gangs", but it does make sense when taking down the larger sauropods. There's no way a T-Rex could eat all of one-- even the smaller ones.
CoyoteCamouflage The thing is, T. rex didn't coexist with any sauropods (unless you count Ojo Alamo's tyrannosaurid as a T. rex specimen and not a separate genus, which did coexist with sauropods).
if you ran up to the T Rex and tried to go Star Wars on it, couldn't it just throw you off somehow? I imagine a huge carnivore like that could send you flying easily.
Sean Patrick well yes that's why medieval armor would be the best option to survive a hit from an attack and also if we're talking about melee weapons a medieval war hammer would be the best option
Mackeroth yes a T-Rex could bite through that armor with difficulty of course however a highly trained medieval knight wearing 15th century armor and has a medieval war hammer could win if he is very close to the T-Rex reason why is because he could get to the legs and break them yes a Warhammer could do that that's really all the Knight has to do is get to the legs and avoid getting caught by the T-Rex's teeth if he can do that then he could pull off a win
It would have more trouble than you'd probably think. The greater the mass of an object, the more stress it causes to the body when moving at speed. If it made too quick of movements or too quick of stops, it would lose control of its body and risk a fatal fall. This is why smaller animals can achieve incredible feats of agility; they don't have the mass to cause strain. That's why the most dangerous weapon you can use against a T Rex is a shovel; just dig a hole big enough to topple it and it's fucked. Line the bottom with stakes for superfluous spite
@@mnyamawamaji5234 Who gives a shit about that? Our strength is our brain, not muscles, even without guns we would still find ways to kill them. Numbers and brains, catapulted us to the top of the food chain.
@@Thecrocodiemanmask even then we get messed up every now and then. Embarassing. And i do care,gustave killed 300 people,they tried to kill him with machine guns,and other weapons but he survived and they couldnt capture him. Lions of tsavo killed lot of people because they really wanted to. So if they really want to try they could still mess us up even if we try with weapons. And top of the food chain means with no weapons,unarmed. Who cares about weapons? Thats p life
Steel cable tripwire might do the trick, but the things it would be tied to would also have to be quite strong. Otherwise it might literally just rip them out of the ground.
@@KiyanPocket they don't have to be mutant big, just big enough to not be ripped out by a Trex. Plenty of places where natural forest hasn't been cleared. Have forest around near me like that.
You forgot to mention that a T. rex would probably not be roaring all the time because it would give away its position. Also it was actually thought to be quite stealthy when hunting large prey, and roaring all the time isn’t a good idea when you are hunting.
I highly recommend that one video by Dangerville called What Did the T-Rex Really Sound Like, especially with headphones, if you have not seen it already.
+todd johnson Be careful, though. If you happen to be going up against a T-Rex from “Jurassic World Evolution”, then you would be screwed trying to use that strategy. Those dinosaurs are absolutely immune to sleep deprivation. :p
This might be one of my favorite episodes in our history. See you live tomorrow and in Footnotes next week. Thanks for watching, and a HUGE thanks to *Dr. John R Hutchinson* check out his work here: t.co/dc3acyVmSO - KH
Definitely your best, really enjoyed the scale and the visualization!
Because Science your amazing Kyle!!! How could a human survive an experiment like Wanda maxximoff and quicksilver and eleven from stranger things? Thanks
Because Science 2:30 Never stand under the cloaca, Kyle... You never know what might come out, and when...
Excuse me? What about Power Rangers and their DINOSAUR ROBOTS that came out before the original Jurassic Park movie? Doesn't that get some credit for dinosaurs being part of pop culture?
Because Science Could you please do an episode of because science on spinosaurus versus Tyrannosaurus rex
For several reasons :
1) they didn’t even exist at the same time .
2) they weren’t even on the same continent
3) Spinosaurus jaw was made to eat fish
4) and would have been far too weak to bite at Tyrannosaurus rex neck and fling it 10 feet away
I understand that the movie Jurassic Park III put it in there for entertainment value but people on TH-cam are talking about it like they could be some believability to this so could you please, I’m begging please rectify this Yours truly an avid watcher of your channel by the way I remember when you had shorthair thanks much Richard Parks
In the words of TierZoo: Humans can win any fight, so long as they have time to prepare.
Whole continent filled with those things? Fuck it, let’s send a few ICBMs there.
So we’re basically batman
@@deanvanzelst5011 but you’re broke so nah
Yup because we humans are fragile as shit lol.. without prep time we are one of the weakest animals on the planet
Yup yall human mains are so lucky because you can max out everything with practice teaching. And technology yall are too op :(
Easy for Thor to say.
A sad, strange little man Thor’s lil baby cousin
How dare you slander the son of Odin
A sad, strange little man easy for me to say!! Thor puny!!! Deprive the T Rex of sleep!!!! It is dead.
Ive seen YOU
Thor, or a gay Dogg the Bounty Hunter?
So a T-Rex is like a Dark Souls boss? Get in close, hack at the shins
Y O U D I E D
Terence Alexander * 100
So if we get behind it and keep poking it in the butt we will win?
probably
Rational Gamers T. rex*
I am pretty sure that the reason why they went extinct is:
There was an earthquake and every Dino fell over and died
seems ligit
Ender Fighter 515 lmao u missed and ruined the joke you deserve this r/woooosh
stop being a Deby downer@@aaronmorino4235
It was the ugly barnacle
Lies it was a metior
Thank God I watched this before hiking! This actually saved my life, as I ran in to a T-Rex at the national forrest. I used a combination of running around trees and stabbing the beast in the legs with my knife. Took some time. But I would have been clueless if it wasn't for these great tips. Thanks!
the person cosplaying as t rex: 😐
@@NoobishPro 🤣💀
@@NoobishPro XDDDD
What's next: "How to kill a dragon and absorb it"
Find a dragonslayer lacrima or be raised by Igneel! Then use your dragonslayer magic XD
or be dovakiin
suck where ?
I EAT ALL THE CHEESE
Fus Ro Da
9:37 - Who else thought he was gonna say drive the sword up the t rex's arse? No one???? Just me??
K then...
I was hoping he wasn't
Thank god he didn't
I did.
Benjamin Gavrin
No doubt, but IF you survive, you have a crazy story to tell. Who else can say they drove a sword right into a t rex's butt?
Aaron Alejos I would drive the sword up it's ass and twist the blade.
We could possibly die and the last thing you're going to say is a butt joke?
honestly, I would rather face a t-rex than a pack of raptors
Well in reality raptor size of a dog but really smart
@@rioajipangestu776 Does not change the fact that its attacks are multiplicatively stronger. Even one of those will maul you to death. It is about nearly as big as a motorcycle and and more agile than a leopard.
Khiean Paquete actually the real velociraptor is only 1m tall and you could easily hold it down and bludgeon it to death
@@rioajipangestu776 theres other types of raptors like the utah and indo some raptors stood 9ft tall velociraptors are small but not all raptors are
@@ice_7057 it a group not single one
probably one of the most dangerous point during your attack is at the moment of it falling. its feet will probably kick out dramatically and since you are most likely near those, it would be one hell of a drop kick.
xbubbahotep like the Hulk punting a toddler.
Humble Soldier Like Beckham punting a kitten...😑😒
how to beat it?
I know!, hand granade!
- Killian
No victory comes without sacrifice...
I rather die taking My T-Rex foe with me, than be a lawyer caught on the restroom...
it would flail sure, but the mass denotes that it would do it slowly. like when moving its legs to chase its pray. its slow and bumbling. We would easily be able to out maneuver it if up close. now imagine being equipped with the same equipment landscapers who trim palm trees use. you would pierce skin and be able to climb the T Rex gouge and cut it without it being able to reach you. only a matter of time before it bleeds out and dies bitch ass T Rex :D
Your damn scientist we're so preoccupied with whether they could,they didn't stop to think if they should
If you could make a giant dinosaur wouldn't you? The money, publicity, the inevitable death and lawsuits?
before scientists could even start trying, there was someone who paid for it :) want to find guilty party? Always follow the money.
Ian Cornell way to butcher the quote, yo
mikerms12 lol how so? It's exactly what he says
Ian Cornell *he doesn't say "damn" *it's "scientists"(plural) *"were"(not we're) *"whether or not they" ... Here's the complete quote; "Yeah, yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn’t stop to think if they should." ... Oh & here's a link medium.com/@Lightfoot.andrew/jurassic-park-lunch-scene-where-they-all-discuss-the-possible-dangers-of-having-prehistoric-3f2e893b4619
"And would need over 475 MT. Dew's to satiate!"
*gives 1 mountain dew*
*t-rex is satisfied*
It was a super concentrated dwe
You need not outrun the T-rex; just outrun the guy next to you. Unless the T-rex is quite hungry, of course. Then you're in real trouble.
Even two humans wouldn’t be enough calories for the T-Rex to consider it worth its time to chase you down
Just be faster than the majority of the group.
After eating a small dozen people, it be too full to go after me. ^^
0:33 behold! The majestic Kylesaurus Constipatous!
Memes and Hearthstone can a 1 mana 1/1 beat a 9 mana 8/8 Charge? XD
Don't you mean Discountius Thorisaurus
Vincent Xu toxmonger'd Elven archer :p
+Vincent Xu : It can if it's part of an Unstompable Stompede.
No, that's just your average Asgardian.
The tail of a T-Rex was probably used to balance that massive top-weight of the animal. If so, it would also be very strong, and as you have illustrated very well (this is probably the best visualization on dinosaur size I've seen in a while) it is also incredibly long. Combining those two facts, coming up behind a T-Rex in order to mess around with its legs might be just as dangerous (if not more so) as coming at it from the front, since just one sweep with that massive tail would be enough to send you flying several feet and crush your body into paste.
3vrLol and even if you get there you might still get stomped.
Oddly, I think the T-Rex's size still plays against it. As Kyle demonstrated, the tail itself is quite high off the ground, and given the amounts of balance that such a large creature would require, I'm not sure that it could actively utilize it's tail very well against a small, low-to-the-ground target.
Not that you wouldn't be smooshed with one hit. Rather, I think that the range of motion required to use the tail as a weapon beyond a little coincidental wiggle-waggle would cause enough torque to tear the Rex's hips apart. Is it a danger? Absolutely, but I definitely think it's much less "actively" dangerous than the front end.
I agree. It might still be a bit dangerous, but its probably so important to the balance of the animal that it wouldn't be able to effectively use it as any sort of weapon against something intentionally without also having to worry about tipping over itself, thus negating any effective use of it as a weapon, and more just an obstacle to avoid.
Monitor lizards are 4 legged, not bi-pedals like Rexxie.
You need to think about this. Bears fight wolves. Tigers fight wild dogs. There were smaller predators that T-rex competed with and probably fought from time to time. It probably was formidable defending itself. T-rex ruled for millions of years. It was probably not as fragile as this video suggests.
Thank god these tutorial videos exist online for free now I can return home with the time machine once I reclaim it from the T-Rex
Yeah me too, I've been having a problem with a Tyrannosaurus for awhile, now I can finally defeat him!
Same
Ever since I studied some engineering, I've always been extra fascinated by the massive complications dinosaurs must have dealt with to be so massive. Look at elephants, which stand more or less on their toes, and can't jump. I was a bit surprised to realize that a fall would be very lethal to the larger dinosaurs. I wonder what their fights would have been like, with their limitations in mind? If two t-rexi fought over territory, if one got knocked over, this would probably have been lethal, and if they preferred posturing more over shows of actual strength. If one good blow could mean death, it'd be a bad idea to pick fights I suppose!
Well we have healed trex skull injuries where it looks like one rex was pretty brutally wrestling the other by its head/trying to lever the top of its braincase off. So yeah trex fighting was britally dangerous
@@rileyernst9086 Yup, we have a lot of evidence of intraspecific combat in Tyrannosaurs. Seems to have been common.
Pfff too easy.
Try to domesticate one. Now That's a challenge!
Alteori did a video on that. It's easier than you'd think.
There is a difference between taming and domesticating.
Just knock it out and stuff meat in its butt
Don't Censor and I want to domesticate one. I the Flintstones taught me anything, they can be really useful for Digging a hole for a pool 😋
Take rxamples from people taming our modern day rapters and corocs and you get a good idea
Attack the T-Rex like rebels? You mean up the exhaust port?
9:29 to 9:36
Snow speeder harpoon cables around the legs.. like those of an ATAT
Exactly what I thought. Now I can't unthink it...
Maybe it likes it like that...
I’m not sure if the exhaust port of a T-Rex is where the eggs come out
What tensile strength would you need your tripwire to have, in order for it to not snap when being exposed to a sprinting T-rex hitting it with one leg first, accelerating forward? And is this a realistic force for vines to have, since that's what would most likely be available?
A decent steal cable would probably be sufficient enough to not snap, but your would have to tie it to something that it wouldn't also just break or somehow come lose from. Though we are talking about something that is exceptionally top heavy, so just a small force applied to unbalance it would probably be enough to accomplish the task even if it did come loose or break in the process.
Also it could break, all it has to do is cause a misstep breaking the stride and causing momentum to topple the beast. The balance point is so precise any disruption could be catastrophic.
An arresting cable from an aircraft carrier, like the Eisenhower CVN69, should work just fine without snapping. As Kyle said in the video, T-Rex would be lucky to "sprint" at all. So you would only have to topple it's mass at 11mph. Which is made easier by it being extremely top heavy.
steel cables or even a regular heavy duty chain would be about in the ballpark. like kyle said its top heavy and might be easy to tip over. so even if the chain snapped in half it would probably have been enough to make the T-rex lose its footing and likely trip it giving you plenty of time to try and cut the heels or run even further.
Michael Berthelsen You would certainly need to wrap it around several times which means it would be visible and easily stepped over. But if you can figure out the whole time travel thing you could probably figure out high to take some strong yet hard to see wiring back with you; or an elephant gun. 🤣
1. Eat food
2. Send sos flare
3. Get Greatsword
4. Swing greatsword
5. Follow it
6. Place Bombs
7. Finish it Off
8. Carve Materials
9. Forge Equipment
10. Repeat
11. get my dragonator
12. Call an hh main one to help you
13. Get some buddies to help murder that bastards family
14. Unlock 4 star quests
A man of culture I see very good sir
And if the T-Rex has a gun what you do?
use more gun.
Pray
Use the Han Solo strategy. Simples...
Laugh at it trying to use it with it's tiny arms and not very helpful fingers.
hope the gun weighs more than 195 kgs
So youre tellin me that the Giant Dad build would help me fight a Trex as well? GD truly is the most op build
Mark Butcher only if you don’t level dex
Zwei is de wei
you realize you have 69 likes right
VERY GOOD.
Wut rng u got biacth
Grabs sword looks to you and says .. see you in vallhalla brother .. runs full Sprint at it
"The Tyrannosaurus Rex is held up as the most fearsome and ferocious predator to ever walk this Earth, and it's true," says a member of the species singularly responsible for the extinction of countless other species.
Clearly did not watch the video.
He’s obviously joking.
Well yeah, but we're viruses, not predators.
@@justsomejerseydevilwithint4606 Virus: infective agent that typically consists of a nucleic acid molecule in a protein coat, is too small to be seen by light microscopy, and is able to multiply only within the living cells of a host.
Predator: an animal that naturally preys on others.
We are predators
@@prophetofwatersheep8100 Fine, invasive predators
A big factor that Kyle forgot to mention is that T-Rex's are both predators and scavengers. They likely sought very large prey, given hint to by the overkill that their bit force would have against smaller animals like ourselves. The articulation of movement a T-Rex posses is so poor that if you managed to get near the rear of their feet there would be nothing that they could do to get to you. If they attempted to deliberately step on you, they would throw off their balance trying to raise their foot 2m off the ground without forward momentum.
In reality a T-Rex would be easier to hunt than an Elephant due to the fact that it is reliance on its forward motion for stability, since it only has two legs as opposed to four; meaning that as soon as you were behind it, it would be helpless against you (aside from its tails random movements). One hunter in front and one behind with spears would leave the Rex with limited options, face the front person who can easily keep their distance while the rear is stabbed multiple times, turn to face the rear simply reversing the problem, or charge/flee where its maneuverability becomes limited and a fit enough couple of humans could not only keep pace but *easily* outlast the dino in a test of stamina. Hunter class humans would do incredibly well in a matchup against what movies try to tell us would be terrifying, when in reality a cougar is a significantly more dangerous threat than nearly any dinosaur that existed.
T-Rex weaknesses: Slow speed up and low top speed, limited stability from being bipedal, inability to turn rapidly, inability to access areas smaller than its beak, stride length, forward heavy center of mass. We wouldn't be hunted by the T-Rex, we would be hunting T-Rex and people would be filming TH-cam videos of themselves trying to take these down with knives.
Sean Peery I bet you are one of those people that thinks they would be better off in a medieval battle without armor right?
You couldn't be more wrong about trex.
though I do think that the idea of people taking out T-rex's out with knives is a bit of an exaggeration to say the least, he does have a point. These beasts were never meant to kill smaller nimble creatures, instead they went for other beasts equal, or even larger in size. this means they aren't optimised for fighting humans to say the least. For them, fighting humans would be like what for us is hitting a fly: yeah we could kill them in one hit, but that means you do have to hit them.
I think a WAAAY more terrifying dinasour for us would be velociraptor, since they're in our weight class and probably have a manouvrability which would be closer to that of us. and still be able to shred us to bids in mere seconds.
THANK YOU
T. rex could run as fast as an Olympic sprinter. And could maintain that speed over great distances. It's very likely that they also hunted juveniles as most predators living or extinct tend to avoid predating on any individual that can conceivably hurt them back. Injury to a predator is a death sentence.
true, but I do think we're talking about quadripedal juveniles which are still A LOT less manouvrable than humans are. especially in terms of rotating and sidewards movement, which is the type of movement you'd need to not get eaten. (think as in a bull fight).
Not only do you have to be a good sprinter, you have to be a long distance sprinter since a T-Rex probably won't give up after 100 meters.
Exactly -- KH
Would he really? I mean, a human seems to be almost too small to be considered an "interesting" prey. Most predators don't chase after what they don't consider "worth the hassle", because they need to save their energy as most as they can - they can't afford any waste.
My dinosaur knowledge is extremely rusty, so I'm honestly curious. Wouldn't it be more logical for the T-Rex to just scare off small animals he's not interested in eating?
Valkorion the Great I don't know much about this either, but I guess it depends on how hungry it is and how many bigger animals are close
I dont know bears eat bugs and T rex was probably like a bear opportunistic.
Ironic Dutch Moonshade adrenaline
i will definitely need this information in the near future
RedSabin looking forward to create a real life jurassic park dont you ?
If you only learn the necessities to live, you'll be ignorant for the rest of your life
If Jurassic park was realistic, cars would be op.
yep and the windows of the cars would de made of stronger material... poor kids ;=;
I never thought about that yo that’s true no way we just throw our lives away like that
If it was realistic Mr John Hammond would be either in Prison or 50 million dollars in debt for the many deaths his creations caused. I mean if you own a pitbull and that pitbull kills a person you'll be paying the consequences, isn't it the same here?.
@@oliverf.68 You forgot something crucial DNA only lasts 1 million years under perfect conditions
Yeah, just ram it into the T-rex to topple it or drive away. Cars definetly WOULD be op XD
8:52 Yeah, having Cable would make things significantly easier, but I'm not that how you'd use him.
Well, first you need a rampant Venom symbiote (or is it symbiont?) to find a T-rex, then Cable can send you a blinged-up spear so you can save the day.
He brings the high caliber rifle option.
CoyoteCamouflage
Good idea! Put a symbiote on it and then let a Poison get it
* calmly grabs a Barret 50. call* "this should work..."
or a 40mm grenade round
Or just feed me something, like maybe you, and then I'll be convinced to kill it.
zachery fluegeman easy kill.
Aim for the heart
zachery fluegeman * calmly grabs M60* this should work better you might miss
Now that I think of it Kyle Hill Is one of the strongest youtubers ive ever seen Hes survived alot of stuff in all his videos from running speeds like the flash and even SURVIVING all the draw backs of it and now this video where he shrugs off being stomped on by a trex really made me think.
Hes one of the characters I expect to see in the new marvel Infinity war. Really hyped for the Kyle hill cameo
This is just so poetic. The greatest strength of the T-Rex is also its greatest weakness.
“Achilles tendie”
-Kyle Hill
First, I wanna say I love how you included the discoveries of recent years, like it having feathers, and how good eyesight it actually had.
And for my question; Do you think you could you distract it with something like a flare, or some other kind of light? Would that be effective?
The distraction should be possible, in the same way that a laser pointer works on felines. A person holding a flare-- particularly in Grant's case, where it is very dark and his physical form is obscured from the predator by heavy rainfall, shouldn't have much issue getting a predator to focus in on a flare-- a distinct oddity that could be something edible. The Rex itself is likely very unused to things like flares, and with the bright red light sparking up in the middle of a storm, it could definitely be more of a focus than the person holding it.
I just want to know where that cliff came from...
CoyoteCamouflage lol for real about the cliff though. I love that movie so much as a kid (still love it) that I used to watch it a few times a week when I was like, 5. Even as a child that cliff confused me.
"...unless some director puts you in heels."
😂😂😂
4:34 actually, the writter scrapped the idea out of the book before publishing it, but he had already talked with Spilberg, and they were writing the book and filming at the same time, and it was much harder to change those scenes from the movie than from the book. In the second book there is actually a guy that dies because he stays still in front of T-rex's nest, the protagonist looking from the security cameras say "he must have read an old paper that claimed T-rex had bad eye sight. It's being long disproven though.", and the T-rex cub jumps out of the nest and eat the guy.
Marcelo Silveira would T. rex have cubs? Or chicks? Maybe Rexlettes. What’s the term for baby reptilians
lol, no idea, I just picked the term I think everyone would understand XD
Marcelo Silveira wasn't Jurassic Park already out before the movie
believe it got released few months prios, but it was still under writing as it was recorded, given the writter talked with Spilberg (his friend) when it was still just an idea. Basically he asked Spilberg what he thought about it, if he should write or if no one would like to see it. Spilberg said that whichever he chose, he would make a movie about it, so the writer started developing the story while talking to Spilberg about what he had already made, both for feedback and to inform on how the movie should go. By the way, the personalities of Hammond and the Lawyear are exchanged in the movies, as well as the girl and the boy who I never remember the names.
Lt ChugaCast There isn't a definitive term for Tyrannosaurus young, if I can recall
Man, you should have said tyranosaurus flex
NICE
Dammit thats a way better name
or combine them and make a tyrannoswoleus flex
you're mum gaye you're so damn right and I love you for that
comic cat Missed opportunity
What if the trex watches your videos?
Then we are all in a whole lot of trouble.
Stephen Strange It’ll wear boots, and shin guards!
In all seriousness, if you went for the ankle slicing tactic, you’d run the risk of getting squashed under its body, or hit by its tail among other things, and considering that larger specimens weighed up to 8.4 tonnes, that’s not a good thing.
*how to fight a human and win*
Then it would pretend it knew everything and die of chronic edutainment disease.
@@senorclown9882 Oh god
This is a daily problem for me, thanks for the help!
???
(Sarcasm)
best coment 10/10
You can also put him against a bigger, less bulky dinosaur that instead of hunting, just ate fish but is completely covered in plot armor.
SuperMissigNo #spino4lyf
Spino probably ate more than just fish. It probably also hunted other Dino's.
Maybe, but it still wouldn't be capable of killing a rex.
SuperMissigNo not necessarily true. It may not have as big as a bite, but it did have massive claws which could slice through just about anything.
SuperMissigNo Nice profile pic :0)
Correction. The heels were not the director's idea. It came from Bryce Dallas Howard herself. Originally she was supposed to have sneakers.
KaWaWu yeah and aside from that she never 'outran' the TRex the animal was barely getting a little jog when she was doing a full on sprint. The TRex never ran so there was no 'out' running to do from her.
Also the access road she led her through was full of turns, not even close to full speed trying to manoeuvre down those back roads and through a Spinosaurus skeleton replica (I loved that part!)
Kyle is the kind of guy that could make you laugh at a funeral. I love this show.
Have you sprinted on a treadmill? 11mph is fast.
Adrenaline is effectively an emergency boost for your body, 11mph is nothing when you are being chased by a T-Rex, you could probably do 20mph for about 20-30 seconds or so before your energy reserves run dry (Even then, you likely wouldn't just collapse, but you would slow down considerably, maybe to the point where rexy could make a meal out of you)
Though eventually, your ATP reserves will be burned up, anaerobic glycolysis will fail due to excessive lactic acid build-up, you will "hit the wall" and down you go, right into rexys waiting maw
@@mwbgaming28 yeah but shouldn't rexy also finish her stamina? I mean it's big it shouldn't be able to run for too long
@@matteobenfatti8436 it's possible, but we don't know the endurance of a 65 million year old animal
@@mwbgaming28 new discovery shows t rex could ran for a long time.
@@megagamingrex5856 then any time travellers who try to escape on foot are done for
Smack its nose with a rolled up newspaper (or ebook reader)
make sure the newspaper is wet hurts like hell
Step 1: Don't.
Done
Correction: Step 1: Realize that the T-Rex has been dead for millions of years. You win ;)
Done.
😆
I have a way to fight one too!
Wait until their extinction.
*They're
wait until they are extinction
They're is short for they are. Does wait until they are extinction make sense to you. Check yourself before correcting someone else
@@ambenyamboli480 You're right, my bad.
Their extinct**
You could always wear plot armor, that always seems to work in the movies
How to fight a T. Rex and Win.
You already did it.
T. Rexs are exint.
You are not.
You may have won, but you didn't actually fight it!
Gets a shotgun fires a shot I WON
Extinct not exint
That's not me, it's my grandma^n..
But we where never alive at the same time to truly take the win in terms of existence D: and the tyrannosaur species had existed in total some 15-20 million years tech speaking they still got us beat by a wide margin sadly :/ but hey there's always the bazooka option! That pretty much wins every time against most anything in nature!!!
Bet, boutta go back in time and try this out, I'll let you know how it went.
Update: It killed me
Alexa play despacito
@@balashibuyeeter2704 Alexa please dont play overused songs
@@balashibuyeeter2704 ok Alexa play "I dont want to respond to 9 year olds who doesn't know what the word gay is"
@@JW-mr5mh lets just stop
F
I like the sword idea... swords are cool..
but there is a chance to get bitten fataly.
Moreover the injured animal could instantly fall over you.
@@deaclavilis6760 Black Knight: It's just a scratch!
When we storming Area 51
and find the dinosaur,
we now know what to do
8:25 This is why I believe ankylosaurus was the most difficult prey item for trex. One well placed swipe from that tail and if it hits the leg of tyrannosaurus, ankylosaurus could literally send trex falling to its own demise from his own weight. Not to mention, ankylosaurus armor could indeed repel at least two bites before succumbing. Triceratops is the most deadly of tyrannos prey but ankylosaurus is the hardest, pun intended, of them all.
Guess Thor and the Grandmaster became friends after Ragnarok.
He did say he liked my hair -- KH
How to take out a T-Rex? A T-Rex .577 rifle. :)
And here I was, thinking that all I needed to fight a T-Rex was a decently large meteor impact.
I stand corrected, because science.
"They didn't show a T.Rex flinging its prey and eating it." DUDE! HAVE YOU NOT SEEN JP2?!
When Eddy got ragdoll/ double teamed!
P.S can you do a video of whether dragons can exist and if so what requirements do these creatures must have in order to exist, plus not every species really needs to be areal or breath fire, some could be aquatic/terrestrial, they may have venom or bacteria like the Komodo, or like a T.Rex have a powerful bite, or a massive beak like the Snapping Turtle.
He actually touched that subject on a number of videos, pretty sure there's a video on fire breathing back at nerdist channel and he explained dragons in one of live streams as well as mentioning similar topic in a video about real life cupid, main problem being that they would need absurdly large wings, many times their size, and then they wouldn't be able to have strong enough muscles to use them. Even largest real life birds are very light and massive flying dragons aren't realistic. Pretty sure he did talk about Komodo at some point too though
He did touch the subject of dragons before when he did a video about whether a dragon could melt the wall from GoT. I thought he also talked about hings like wingspan and weight there, but I'm not sure.
Shadiverstity has a few good videos on fighting dragons if your interested, here is one. th-cam.com/video/U6FxChSwyJI/w-d-xo.html
Highly recommend them.
MAB - Check out this video it was a lot of fun to watch. It pretends Dragons are real and how we would think they would do what we portray Dragons doing. th-cam.com/video/8FIDeOOL52Q/w-d-xo.html
I question the wisdom of using a sword against the tendons, I think an axe would be much better suited for this task. Additionally, you'd better be prepared to run once you cut the tendon, you might get hit with part of its body while it falls. Even a swipe of the tail would be like getting hit with a falling tree. I think your best bet, barring modern day weaponry would be either tripwires or a hidden trench with pikes set into the ground like a tiger trap. It would be fairly simple to make one that you could run over, but would collapse under the weight of the Tyrannosaur.
TheJeffreyJJones if it cuts the skin, doubt it’d matter what you’re using. T-Rex might be big and powerful but it’d sure as hell notice if you ram a sword point into its ankle. The trick is doing it and then getting the eff outta there whilst the monster tramples around in agony...
NotQuiteEnglish realistic it would probably trash around the second it notice something alive in it’s blind spot. Probably stomping and tail swiping before you could even get in a hit.
As for as medieval type weaponry is concerned, a sword is maximized for speed and redirection. An ax is best for impact against a hard target like wood or some poor Irishman’s shield. However an ax has a far shorter edged section making the chances of missing the target more likely. A sword, is faster and easier to get in a second strike if you miss, also less likely to miss because it has a much longer sharp edge. And against a soft target like tendons and skin, you would be able to get by with a long slicing action messing up more flesh as you go.
Of course something to keep you AWAY from the big animal is even better, a good pike formation would be very useful and peppering them with arrows is better still.
I’d still rather have my 45-70 elephant rifle or Barrett 50 Cal any day lol
Keep in mind that big animals are not "soft", there is a guy in sweden who fended off a moose by repeatedly axing him in the face and the moose lived. Bears can take a brutal amount of punishment before expiring, notably knifes through the skull. A leg that can withstand the full t-rex weight, plus whatever scales they have is not going to be a soft target. I would say to leave any notions of meleeing a t-rex at home. Just look at how hard it was for primitive humans hunted mammoths, and those were animals that mainly feared us, a t-rex is going to plow through a pike formation, and that's if you get anyone ballsy enough to maintain the formation against a charging t-rex, considering how much training it took to do that against a simple cavalry charge I find that unlikely.
Also, while the 45-70 can certainly kill an elephant it's not an "elephant rifle". You can kill an elephant with a lot of standard rounds because it's skull has a big sinus that leads directly to the brain. A t-rex doesn't have that point where the trunk connects to the skull, it's just jaws and hard, dense bone. Also, I'm guessing that due to how they are built, a charging t-rex head would bounce and weave like a boxer during the charge, instead of staying leveled like the elephant. I would say the biggest elephant rifle would not be big enough to reliably taking down these beasts. Trapping him, like we used to do with mammoths, certainly sounds like the most sensible solution so far. And since it has scavenging habits, it would not be very hard to bait it.
On the other hand, that leg is also holding up the full weight of a T-Rex... So a successful hit to the knee joint with even a more standard rifle round level of power could well mess it up enough to cause the beast to trip. Which would be rather bad for it.
It seems strange to say it, but in many ways, I feel like the T. Rex's enormous size is its biggest weakness. When dealing with enormous creatures, it's important to remember the Square-Cube Law, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square-cube_law which in essence says that as an object grows larger, its volume will grow faster than its surface area, because surface area grows in a second power exponential relationship but volume grows in a third power exponent. So for ever two units of length you gain, surface area increases by 4 but volume increases by 8.
This means that creatures get bigger and bigger, their bodies have to become proportionally stronger and have comparatively bigger bones and muscles compared to their bodies. Kyle has pointed this out previously in the episode about upper limits on the size of titans in Attack on Titan th-cam.com/video/Bewq3rXFlHE/w-d-xo.html This is why enormous animals like elephants and sauropods have such thick bones proportional to their bodies, especially in their legs. This is an example of allometric scaling en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allometry , where larger animals have to have stouter proportions to increase the cross sectional area of their bones and muscles, compared to the relatively spindly bones that small animals can get away with.
The tyrannosaurus seems to exist right on the edge of what is biomechanically feasible. Its head is positively enormous, and it had to have its incredibly long tail just to counterbalance it. It's essentially just a giant mouth on legs. This means that a lot of its mass is located away from its center of gravity. Not only that, we can assume from its anatomy and estimated native range that it mainly hunted by chasing down prey on flat plains, so it wouldn't have had to maneuver very quickly.
All this is to just agree with Kyle's point, that the T. Rex's huge body makes it VERY difficult for it to turn quickly, so trying to escape in an area with lots of obstacles is a good move. In fact it may be even better than Kyle suggested, because I believe that the T. Rex's enormous size would mean that it would have to be incredibly careful in close quarters like this, since perhaps its biggest threat would be itself. Attempting to turn sharply at speed would be a serious danger to its weakest point--its ankles--and colliding with a solid object could be devastating, since some of Tyrannosaurus' bones were hollow to reduce mass, and we're not sure if they had a sternum, so a collision could break several ribs.
So the densely wooded part of the island where we first encounter the T. Rex might be the worst place for it to try to catch someone, and I think it would want to be careful about pulling some of the maneuvers it tries at 0:51. It's just too heavy to be careless about throwing its weight around.
Except for the fact that it was mostly an ambush predator and lived in grasslands with forests similar to the one mentioned.
I'm by no means an expert, but I don't look at that body style and think ambush predator. It's too tall, too heavy, and not compact enough. I'm sure that it would attack suddenly and is much better suited to short chases, which I suppose you could call an ambush, but I still get the sense that it had to run, and basic physics suggests that it is much better at running in a straight line.
But regardless, it doesn't really change my point. From everything we can guess based on its fossils, it just seems that its body is too big to maneuver in tight spaces.
giggityguy Ambush doesn’t mean fast in the case I presented. It means to wait in a place dense or not and suddenly attack/start walking after a target. It could definitely not fit in very tight spaces but since part of its environment are forests I think he could be able to maneuver through them. (Especially the one presented in the video)
giggityguy they suggest it was an ambush predator that chased out its prey. The chased out part I can explain in detail but the ambush part is basically guess work, we know it hunted and didn’t scavenge much, we know it couldn’t sprint but we don’t know it’s patterning or how still it could stay. I mean elephants are known to be aggressive and suddenly sprint out of the woods without people knowing they even were there so it can be done.
Great comment.
I love how he measures caloric intake in large Mountain Dews.
americans be like
So like, wait, are you a master at writing backwards or something?
xweert711 I was thinking the same thing
i imagine the video is flipped :V
I'm really bummed that there were no jokes which referenced the 'large hadrosaur collider'.
What's that?
Chris Gaming It’s a play on the Large Hadron Collider particle accelerator and Hadrosaur, aka duck billed dinosaurs like Edmontosaurus that T. rex liked to eat
Who needs science for this question?? The answer is use a gun. If that doesnt work, use a bigger gun.
And if that doesn’t work, use more gun.
And if that doesn't work, use the spare rocket launcher, also I would say large flamethrowers would at least make it flinch
'MERICA
I'm not sure if a standard handgun would work, but a shotgun or a rifle should be enough.
Pablo de la Torre Gálvez its a t-rex, not a honey badger. Should die pretty easily.
For the sword option I'd use a greatsword-sized falchion, give it to my strongest guy, and have him do a wrath cut to the tendons to maximize the chance of success. For the mass of the greatsword would give the cut bite, and the edge geometry of the falchion would make it able to slice as effortlessly into flesh as your razor shaves hair. The strength of the wielder would provide lots of force and the wrath cut, focused on one powerful strike, would best focus that force on the fine razor-edge of the blade to devastate the T-Rex. Also, I's have a distraction keeping the T-Rex occupied from the puny human sneaking behind it to sever its tendons.
The biggest problem with fighting a T-Rex as a human is that most humans are in the same size range as most of the animals that T-Rexes hunted for food. We mammals were really, really tiny back then, field mouse sized or less, so that is why mammals were able to avoid getting eaten... But big ol' adult Humans now-a-days at Least 40 kg, most being much more... and that makes us perfectly snack sized for ol' Texie
It would take everything we have as a human to survive such an encounter, and I think you picked the right weapons for the job!
Ignoring the firearms your suggested (because that's just not fun from a thought experiment perspective), in this episode you show yourself using a Zweihänder to cut the T-Rex's Achilles Tendon, that is actually a pretty good choice of weapon. Most Zweihänders were only 2 kg (4.4 lb), and while they were really big, you could still run around with them over your shoulder with ease. The massive blade generates a LOT of cutting force when swung properly, and could probably cut through the beast's thick armor-like hide.
The biggest weakness of the Zweihänder is it's lack of agility, you really only get to swing it in WIDE archs either side to side or sweeping X shaped cuts. The Zweihänder was really not used like a "Sword" at all, tactically speaking. It was closer to a Pole-Arm or Spear, and most Doppelsöldner (The dudes who carried these weapons into battle on the front lines) were put in the same formations with Pikemen and Pole-Arm users.
BUT Fighting a T-Rex with a Zweihänder sort of negates all of those weaknesses for the sword! The T-Rex is a COLOSSAL target, and the wide motions you use in cutting would be effective! Slice near the face and mouth to try to discourage it from attacking you, and run near the legs to cut the Achilles Tendon. The Zweihänder is literally Designed to dominate a wide area on the battlefield, and using a BIG sword to attack a BIG target would work! Plus against a T-Rex even STABBING it with that long blade could be lethal for the animal, reaching vital organs in the belly and ribcage!
All in all, good pick!
Another point tho, the environment. If it's set in modern days the T-rex would barely be able to walk as the oxygen level is way too low, and if you are in Cretaceous your physical strength would be much better too.
And the best weapon would likely be an axe as I doubt the sword would have enough weight behind it to do the job, reptile skin is tough.
TLDR
@issa benariba
TL;DR
Big Sword cut good, good against T-Rex, just don't be a wimp!
BlankPicketSign thanks you’re a true legend
WTF? The oxygen level were pretty much the same, that and oxygen isnt even related to how big dinosaurs were able to get.
Oh man I've always wanted to fight a dinosaur.
Dallas Jackson and now you can win
Dallas Jackson they say birds are dinosaurs, so go fight a cassowary
How to fight against a T-rex? Become Turok and see how he deals with it.
Ira Pacheco Well Said XD Turok Wrecks Anything
Or you can use a zweihander
Just use the tek bow
Next video: "Why you would need to know how fight a T-Rex, and win"
what kind of environmental devastation would a mosasaurus inflict if was in the ocean?
In Jurassic World, I calculated that Mosa was being fed about 3 tons of food per day. At that rate, it would need to eat the equivalent of one 90-ton whale every month
UFO KingJose99 in the real world, a mososaurus wouldn't actually have an impact. Sure, the largest species may have gotten up to 17 m, but you compare that to pods of killer whales that are almost that size and realize that a single reptile would eat a lot less than a family of massive mammals. Besides, we are still discovering new species of beaked whales as recent as a few years ago, so there really wouldn't be an impact on the ocean. It could definitely kill some beach goers though.
beach-goers/surfers for snacks
hopefully they'd get a taste for jelly fish
UFO KingJose99 What kind of fear do people have in fake things like aliens or dinos ?
*Conclusion: fighting a T-Rex remains easier than fighting a Velociraptor.*
Hmm. I'd rather fight the T. rex -- KH
Because Science *"Clever Girl".... xD*
DS6 Prophet thats where the attack comes...not from the front but from the side.
+Ds6 Prophet Velociraptor was tiny, about the size of a large Turkey. All you would have to do is kick it and a Velociraptor would go flying like a football. Utahraptor is the raptor you would have to look out for, it was 23 feet long and it weighed about as much as a polar bear.
Velociraptor is much much easier, it's Utahraptor and Dakotaraptor you should really look out for.
Wouldn’t a T. rex have enough strength and/or momentum to break through a normal trip wire?
Steel cables would probably do the job though
Depends on what you tie it to, how taut the line is and what material you use.
This may be one of my favorite videos from this channel
Glad so much research has come out regarding the T-Rex's biomechanics. Really glad to see that, like all animals, it isn't utterly overpowered
I will try spinning, thats a good trick
AGHANIM 04 😂
AGHANIM 04 It is
AGHANIM 04
And use the force too....
If you want to win a fight with T-Rex run in a straight line & when it’s close to catching you make the. Sharpest turn at full speed & at full speed Tyrannosaurus aren’t built to sharp turns at there full speed. Turning at full speed will make the T-Rex fall over & hurting itself in the process. After all you could imagine a bipedal weighing in over 8-10tons could easily cause the animal to break its own leg.
Carmelosaurus ... it’s almost as if I say this very thing in the episode... - KH
Almost XD
Most people aren’t going to believe me but I did right down this comment. I watched the episode because as soon I’ve seen the name of the video I absolutely couldn’t help but not right it down XD
Carmelosaurus - plausible; IF it doesnt fall on top of you in the process.
Just make sure you stay out of reach. Turning in reach it could turn its head to try getting you. I suppose it would be an interesting discussion how turning its head could upset its balance.
"A possibly Peter Quilled body" 😂😂😂 gosh I love his puns.
Now that's some practical knowledge!
Yeah
Gotta go buy a sword
This guy looks like Zaphod Beeblebrox from the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy movie.
But way, way hotter.
A needed video, havent left my house in months becuase Im unsure on how to fight a T-Rex *until now*
also, the trex is apparently bad at turning so if you wanna outrun a trex, keep making sharp turns
PataponCreeper Dark Souls it: hug it's butt.
Get a killing slap by tail
I'm good thanks
So rollerblades would be op? XD
@FMNH-PR2081 oh I actually didn't know that, wow, ok, that's kinda cool actually
Kyle Hill: The Jurrasic Boi
(Even though that's technically the wrong time period)
Viewtiful Orange Peel Cretaceous boi.
Damn, you got to meet Jeff Goldblum? That's awesome!
He plays a jazz show every Wednesday night here in LA (Rockwell Table and Stage). I've been 4 times. He's remembered me each time, taken the time to say "Because Science" with me, and is *really good* at jazz piano. Highly recommended if you're in the area. One of the best nights in LA. -- KH
Five Goldblums outta five Goldblums
I feel like I need to make a trip out to LA just to meet you AND Jeff Goldblum at the same time. My head would explode from the awesomeness.
Hijynks h
let's just say, Life finds a way
It's cool that you posted this video at the same time I happened to be thinking about this very thing... see, I thought it was weird that in Jurassic park 3 the weapons that were brought to the island were ineffective... as the dude who got eaten by the spino early on was carrying a 50BMG rifle of some sort "presumably semi automatic" and a 50BMG round. Even a full metal jacket round "not armor piercing" is capable of passing through inches of steel and still possessing the force to kill a man... and I hate to say this, but the trex "or spino" do not have tungsten skulls or sternums... meaning the 50 caliber round would be able to drop a trex just like a hunting rifle drops a deer, because at the end of the day, humans bent nature to our will, and harness the chemical potential energy to throw metal rocks at several kilometers a second... and dinosaurs just aren't advanced enough to counter that
Yeah, especially considering how light dinosaur bones actually are relative to their size...
I guess he missed
Alex Rubey Humans ain't harnessed shit , the waether still manages to kick our ass even in its mildest form.
Trigonix ZeNW I guess he was budget protection
Evilmike42 regardless, I was going off what was in the film... and to be honest with you, a 30-06 would likely be enough to kill a dinosaur yes, I myself frequent the .338 as an elk rifle... however, I would still take a .50 any day of the week, because the only kill is overkill
I think the dinos we'd have most trouble fighting are medium-sized ones, approx. 4 to 8 meters long. We don't have enough strength to take them down and we won't be able to make them topple themselves effectively.
well there is a thing called guns...
And guns are a whole lot more effective than dino movies make it seem lol
Thanks ill remember this when I go to fight a t rex
how it going to shoot actertly
1. Okay but if you were to run with wire around it’s legs while it walked wouldn’t the force of its legs moving rip the wires out of your hand if not rip off your arms?
2. There is evidence that they ran in packs (flocks?) good luck fighting multiple T-Rex(es?) at once. Are you trying to get me killed Kyle?
Citation on them running in packs? Also yeah the wires would get ripped from your hands
Sean Bush www.google.com/amp/s/amp.livescience.com/46965-tyrannosaurs-were-pack-animals.html controversial but still a scary thought
Luckely are humans pack animals too.
Huh. I'm still skeptical of their "gangs", but it does make sense when taking down the larger sauropods. There's no way a T-Rex could eat all of one-- even the smaller ones.
CoyoteCamouflage The thing is, T. rex didn't coexist with any sauropods (unless you count Ojo Alamo's tyrannosaurid as a T. rex specimen and not a separate genus, which did coexist with sauropods).
Easy..
Make it watch Jurassic Park 3
DagonMusic or Green lantern to give it cancer and die
DagonMusic T Rexes never stop growing until death.
ALAN!
why do i feel like this will be useful someday
fighting an elephant.... maybe
if you ran up to the T Rex and tried to go Star Wars on it, couldn't it just throw you off somehow? I imagine a huge carnivore like that could send you flying easily.
Sean Patrick dont forget its an Animal. So its waaaaay stupid then Humans. And its a fucking Reptile that means He is even dumber
Sean Patrick well yes that's why medieval armor would be the best option to survive a hit from an attack and also if we're talking about melee weapons a medieval war hammer would be the best option
Mackeroth yes a T-Rex could bite through that armor with difficulty of course however a highly trained medieval knight wearing 15th century armor and has a medieval war hammer could win if he is very close to the T-Rex reason why is because he could get to the legs and break them yes a Warhammer could do that that's really all the Knight has to do is get to the legs and avoid getting caught by the T-Rex's teeth if he can do that then he could pull off a win
It would have more trouble than you'd probably think. The greater the mass of an object, the more stress it causes to the body when moving at speed. If it made too quick of movements or too quick of stops, it would lose control of its body and risk a fatal fall. This is why smaller animals can achieve incredible feats of agility; they don't have the mass to cause strain. That's why the most dangerous weapon you can use against a T Rex is a shovel; just dig a hole big enough to topple it and it's fucked. Line the bottom with stakes for superfluous spite
XerasDezarrys or just nuke it from orbit, it’s just my personal preference.
Be a Spinosaurus in 2001?
Matteus Silvestre....low blow dude...low blow lol
Cody Newcomb You should see what 2014 did to ol' Spino.
Matteus Silvestre nothing. It's still roaming the island.
Ninja Hombrepalito he's talking about scientific changes in 2014 buckaroo. It's a quadruped/awkward biped that's primarily aquatic.
Screw you
Awesome, i feel ready now for when some crazy scientist decides to bring these monsters back to life
A 700 Nitro Express or a Grizzly 50 cal will help put human back on top are the food chain against a T-Rex.
A tank would work too c:
AND you get to blow shit up!
murica
But in a physical fight we aint shit
@@mnyamawamaji5234
Who gives a shit about that? Our strength is our brain, not muscles, even without guns we would still find ways to kill them. Numbers and brains, catapulted us to the top of the food chain.
@@Thecrocodiemanmask even then we get messed up every now and then. Embarassing. And i do care,gustave killed 300 people,they tried to kill him with machine guns,and other weapons but he survived and they couldnt capture him. Lions of tsavo killed lot of people because they really wanted to. So if they really want to try they could still mess us up even if we try with weapons. And top of the food chain means with no weapons,unarmed. Who cares about weapons? Thats p life
A trex could break a regular trip wire since its legs are so strong right?
it'd have to be one hell of a tripwire yeah
Steel cable tripwire might do the trick, but the things it would be tied to would also have to be quite strong. Otherwise it might literally just rip them out of the ground.
So like, a steel cable tied between two sizeable trees.
@@morosis82 Sizable trees lmao. Big trees are already hard to find near each other since they will compete for nutrients they gain.
@@KiyanPocket they don't have to be mutant big, just big enough to not be ripped out by a Trex. Plenty of places where natural forest hasn't been cleared. Have forest around near me like that.
Even heard of a Triceratops' brow horns?
Or an Ankylosaurus‘ tail club.
Or the meteorite...all three extinct
Or a rhino
Gumball the Baby Triceratops are you referring to the new movie?
Gumball the Baby Triceratops or a spinosaurus hiding in a river waiting for the Rex to take a drink.
You fight it from a distance with heavy ordinance
so uhm a yamato class battleship with 12-14 inch guns?
Tsar Bomba FTW !
Cut its head off. If that doesn’t work, throw it into the abyss.
“Your life... found a way” that has to be the most hilarious thing Lyle has said in the this show. OMG I’m dying right now
And knowing is half the battle
G.I Jooooooooeeeeeeeeeee
the other half is incredible violence
Thanks for the monster Hunter guide
Capybara lllpl
L
P
???lkokoookklklllllllojjjkjydchvbvbvbnnbhjjjj
Capybara they kept pronouceing anjanath wrong
You forgot to mention that a T. rex would probably not be roaring all the time because it would give away its position. Also it was actually thought to be quite stealthy when hunting large prey, and roaring all the time isn’t a good idea when you are hunting.
trex probably quacked cause its a bird
I highly recommend that one video by Dangerville called What Did the T-Rex Really Sound Like, especially with headphones, if you have not seen it already.
The Bronze Tank it would have had sounds more similar to crocodile or like a really mad cassowary, a bunch of low bone chilling sounds
Lexi You forgot to mention that A T Rex needs to sleep. So deprive it of sleep.
+todd johnson
Be careful, though. If you happen to be going up against a T-Rex from “Jurassic World Evolution”, then you would be screwed trying to use that strategy. Those dinosaurs are absolutely immune to sleep deprivation. :p
But...But what if you dont wanna fight a T-Rex cuz you are too flashed About the Fact off havin found a Living T-Rex?
Brachy LP for real like 70% of people