Prusament PC Blend - The strongest material I tested!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 เม.ย. 2024
  • Prusament PC Blend is Prusa's engineering-grade material, that's strong but easy to use. Let's test this filament and find out how it compares to other 3D printing materials.
    Test samples and methods: / filament-test-16238656
    Website article: www.cnckitchen.com/blog/prusa...
    💚 Support me 💚
    Patreon: / cnckitchen
    Join as a TH-cam member!
    Original CNC Kitchen Threaded Inserts: geni.us/CNCKInsertsChoice
    Merch: teespring.com/stores/cnckitchen
    Buy an Original Prusa i3 printer: geni.us/CNCKPrusa
    PayPal: www.paypal.me/CNCKitchen
    Shop at Matterhackers(US): www.matterhackers.com/?aff=7479
    Shop at 3DJake(EU): geni.us/zHvnB
    🎙Check out The Meltzone Podcast: / @themeltzone
    🛒 Equipment used in this video:
    Prusament PCBlend (Affiliate): geni.us/Pvd1a
    Prusament Carbon Fiber PCBlend (Affiliate): geni.us/NTFUGH7
    Hobbyking Premium PC (Affiliate): geni.us/fU00iAM
    Polymaker Polymax PC (Affiliate): geni.us/pVYjJB
    Original Prusa MK3 (Affiliate): geni.us/CNCKPrusa
    Food Dehydrator for Drying (Affiliate): geni.us/MW7Sxco
    eSUN DryBox (Affiliate): geni.us/Pe7Lr2
    🎥 Related videos:
    PLA vs PETG vs ASA: • The BEST 3D printing m...
    DIY Universal Test Machine: • Fully OPEN SOURCE Univ...
    📖 Further Links:
    DIY Izod Test Machine: www.thingiverse.com/thing:351...
    ⚙ My gear (Affiliate Links):
    🎥 CAMERAS & LENSES
    Panasonic GH5 - Professional 4k60 camera: geni.us/LMN0CmS
    Panasonic GX80/GX85 - Great value system camera: geni.us/M2Sm
    30mm f2.8 macro - Great Macro Lens (80% of my videos): geni.us/vEwqD
    10-25mm f1.7 - Awesome Lens: geni.us/ZTBH
    12-35mm f2.6 - Great Allround Lens: geni.us/S9GOsr
    14-140mm f3.5-5.6 - My go-to travel Lens: geni.us/fSAyKo
    25mm f1.4 - Nice prime for photography: geni.us/mqWM
    🎙AUDIO
    Rode Video Mic Pro - Shotgun mic: geni.us/6JFRdJ
    Rode Film Maker Kit - Wireless mic: geni.us/XMD2N
    Rode NT-USB - Studio Mic: geni.us/YVONvy
    🔴 LIVE STREAMING
    Elgatoo Stream Deck: geni.us/ppIiAL
    Elgatoo HDMI USB Capture Card: geni.us/imhD
    Logitech C920 - Overhead camera: geni.us/ViVgB
    Follow me on Twitter: / cnc_kitchen
    Follow me on Instagram: / cnckitchenyt
    Chapters
    00:00 Introduction
    00:36 Polycarbonate
    01:56 Prusament PC Blend
    03:42 Print quality
    06:53 Mechanical Tests
    12:46 Summary
    #3Dprinting #toughStuff #filamentTest
    DISCLAIMER: None of these tests have been performed with calibrated or verified test equipment. The results are for entertainment purposes only! Inform yourself!
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 481

  • @CNCKitchen
    @CNCKitchen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    Polycarbonate?! Is there a need for these technical materials in 3D printing?
    Don't forget to like & subscribe and share this video on Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, and other platforms!

    • @AwesomeMau5Heads
      @AwesomeMau5Heads 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's mixed with pbt per their MSDS.

    • @AwesomeMau5Heads
      @AwesomeMau5Heads 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Also push plastics sells it in America for 50$ a kilo. Goes down to 30$ a kilo of bought in bulk.

    • @AwesomeMau5Heads
      @AwesomeMau5Heads 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I also print with it exclusively.

    • @theheadone
      @theheadone 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Please check out Priline PC-CF. I've been using that stuff for a couple years now (I think it's only available on amazon) I'm a mechanical engineer and I use this stuff for everything (mounts, brackets, etc.) I print this using my prusa mk3 and Railcore using profiles for prusaslicer for atomic CF-PETG. Thank you for your amazing content! It helps to educate me and allows me to help make proper decisions for my engineering models!

    • @joshsekel
      @joshsekel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      So would you consider using this for Voron parts given the strength and heat properties? I wonder how PC creeps? That would make a great test series, the creep characteristics of different materials. Also how common lubricants effect strength over time.
      We really need you to become a full time you tuber so you can answer all the questions!

  • @Bajotaz
    @Bajotaz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +250

    "Not everyone needs a 1kg spool" ... Me looking for 10kg spools...

    • @zakariakhamees
      @zakariakhamees 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      10 kg! Are you printing a house or what? 🤣

    • @ogxoutcast44
      @ogxoutcast44 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@zakariakhamees 1kg with a .8 nozzle is like nothing

    • @zakariakhamees
      @zakariakhamees 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ogxoutcast44 That makes sense 👍🏻

    • @thor_269
      @thor_269 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I'm over here ordering multiple 2kg spools of PETG, because I just print so much

    • @nukularpictures
      @nukularpictures 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@zakariakhamees I mean if you do a lot of technical stuff why not? Some projects of mine require several kg of plastic and with a E3D SuperVulcano it is not a problem. With a 1mm nozzle I get over 50mm^3 / s of material flow and over 70mm^3/s with 1.2mm. So given the denstiy of plastics is usually between 1.2g/cm^3 - 1.4g/cm^3 I run between 220g/h (50mm^2/s and 1.2g/cm^3) and 350g/h (70mm^2 and 1.4g/cm^3).
      In theory the SuperVulcano can go over 100mm^3/s but that requires the 1.4mm nozzle and I find that too big.
      But yeah for technical prints 1kg spools can be a bit of a joke. Just does not last long enough.

  • @coltonmccormack8978
    @coltonmccormack8978 2 ปีที่แล้ว +132

    It looks like Prusa just changed the formula on this 3 days ago and it is now less dense. I wonder how much that affects its properties. From Prusa: "Prusament PC Blend has a new formula since 9. 6. 2021 The material density is now slightly lower than before, resulting in a minimal spool weight of 970 g. The approximate length of the filament is 330 m - the same length as the standard Prusament."

    • @wervelstroom
      @wervelstroom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Prusament PC blend in the original formula was the ultimate filament for gears!!! I hope that changing the formula does not make it less good...

    • @CNCKitchen
      @CNCKitchen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      Thanks for the information. Might need to consider re-testing a couple of properties.

    • @smlkat
      @smlkat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@CNCKitchen you should also try the new Prusament PCCF (PC Blend+Carbon fiber)

    • @gg-gn3re
      @gg-gn3re 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      so you get jipped 30grams? wow

    • @The0nionKnight
      @The0nionKnight 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@wervelstroom Taulman Alloy 910 is the best for gears.

  • @coltonmccormack8978
    @coltonmccormack8978 2 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    I greatly appreciate your focus on exotic engineering filaments and testing procedures. You've been an excellent resource for supplementing my design process for functional parts. Cheers.

    • @seanwieland9763
      @seanwieland9763 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I hope that polycarbonate blends won’t be considered “exotic” much longer.

    • @coltonmccormack8978
      @coltonmccormack8978 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@seanwieland9763 Agreed. Though I wasn't necessarily talking about this specific filament, but rather his channel in general. I am cautiously optimistic that PC will replace ABS as my "go to" functional filament. I tend to print pretty large prints (machine parts, jigs, robot chassis) and even in my 50C chamber printer I get a bit too much warp for fitment on parts with my current PC. PC-CF is pretty stable, though. Might have to add active heating.

    • @kerbodynamicx472
      @kerbodynamicx472 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@coltonmccormack8978 I want to try PC-CF but it is kinda expensive and requires hardened nozzles. Yeah, I wish polycarbonate should become a common filament along with PLA and PETG. There are some properties of ABS that just suck, its smell and its low tensile strength. PC is far stronger than ABS and should be appreciated more!

  • @forestbirdoriginals4917
    @forestbirdoriginals4917 2 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    I was always told to increase the temp by 10 degrees for steel nozzles for what that’s worth, I also confirmed my A2 nozzles and Nozzle X benefit from this on all materials

    • @stevenmcculloch5727
      @stevenmcculloch5727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yeah the prints from the steel nozzle are weaker because the extruded plastic is colder. Steel is less conductive so heat transfer into the material is slower.

    • @seanwieland9763
      @seanwieland9763 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, steel doesn’t retain heat as well as brass.

    • @Ebonyqwe
      @Ebonyqwe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Interesting, if this is well known then Prusa slicer needs to add in the choice of material for hotend

    • @stevenmcculloch5727
      @stevenmcculloch5727 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Ebonyqwe This could easily lead to confusion if the actual printing temp is set to be different from the one desired.

    • @Ebonyqwe
      @Ebonyqwe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@stevenmcculloch5727 im not sure how it could be so confusing.

  • @infernaldaedra
    @infernaldaedra 2 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Stronger filaments will always be useful for prototyping and functional parts. I'd love to see an engineering materials strength test and comparison. PEEK ,PEKK PEEK blends, PC, Carbon Fiber variants!

    • @xxxm981
      @xxxm981 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Especially stuff like PEEK.... sadly i don´t think he has a high temp Printer you would need for that

    • @infernaldaedra
      @infernaldaedra 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@xxxm981 I think slice engineering and volcano make hotends for it but maybe he could have test parts printed by VisionMiner or something because they never seem to do strength tests.

    • @Fluffehfox
      @Fluffehfox 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@infernaldaedra i would love it if VisionMiner did standarized test instead of burn crush

    • @mophie6941
      @mophie6941 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yea but to be fair getting the high temp for PEEK is the least of your problem with this material 😅😅

    • @infernaldaedra
      @infernaldaedra 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mophie6941 Okay but how strong are the parts between the different blends and polymers?

  • @marsgizmo
    @marsgizmo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    Love the in-depth review!
    It's remarkable how many hours you put into testing.

  • @JT-Works
    @JT-Works ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Where is the Prudament PC Carbon Fiber video? You mentioned it was coming soon, 7 months ago. Eitherway, thanks for all you do for the 3D printing community.

  • @HybridRobotix
    @HybridRobotix 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really like your filament analysis videos! They are very useful in helping me choose filament for specific uses.

  • @alchemistTi
    @alchemistTi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    I’m guessing 10-15 degrees hotter with a steel nozzle will bring the results inline.

    • @INSOMNIAC205
      @INSOMNIAC205 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jup, very likely. On my first printer i usually had to up them by 5-10°C after installing a SS nozzle. But that's what i would expect to be the crulpit in this case too.
      But i'm sure Stefan will figure that out way more excessive and in detail in the close future. 🤣

    • @DrakeMem
      @DrakeMem 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yup, I was gonna say

    • @oliversmeeton
      @oliversmeeton 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought the same, you probably need to re-tune your print temp when using a different nozzle material as well as potentially running pid auto tune to calibrate for the change in thermal property of the nozzle. Also for the best results it may have been better to tune the temp to start with instead of using the stock profile.

    • @Lucas_sGarage
      @Lucas_sGarage 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wonder what would happend with a copper nozzle.... Or if u are rich a gold one

    • @namAehT
      @namAehT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      In my experiance printing with the E3D Nozzel-X I needed to raise the temps by 10-20 degrees to get good results. Switching to a copper heat block (from the stock aluminium) negated this.

  • @BitSmythe
    @BitSmythe 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    All your analyses are more detailed than I could ever have imagined!

  • @rohitkrishnan4429
    @rohitkrishnan4429 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude.. You work so HARD!! WOW.
    I'm probably a step below beginner at this point and its so encouraging to see the information that you and so many other folks have already put out! Thank you.

  • @jaakkopontinen
    @jaakkopontinen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stefan, you're the genuine article 👍 Keep it up and greetings from Finland.

  • @lovecastle7154
    @lovecastle7154 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    The brass nozzle wore out and so was wider than the steel, this is why adhesion was improved. If you added an extrusion multiplier to the steel nozzle you’d get the same effect

    • @SilkyWayFPV
      @SilkyWayFPV 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I would also say due to the worse heat dissipation you should use 5-10 degrees higher temperature. I also found layer adhesion is worse when same print temp is used

  • @axeldios9036
    @axeldios9036 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep up the good work, as usual good testing, and through information

  • @JATMN
    @JATMN 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting results.. Think this is the first PC that I have seen that actually stands up to moisture. Will be keeping this material in mind for future projects.

  • @le_potate3861
    @le_potate3861 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been waiting for this for a long time

  • @randomname4726
    @randomname4726 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are truly an asset to the 3D Printing community!

  • @heron5045
    @heron5045 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for the great material test

  • @BladeWalker91
    @BladeWalker91 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    So what I'm hearing is that we need a comprehensive guide on different types of nozzle materials and types, from simple brass and steel, to fancy stuff, like brass with sapphire tip, or nickel plated copper. Looking forward to it

  • @PutTheKettleOnGromit
    @PutTheKettleOnGromit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the video. Great as always. Cheers Mate.
    I print with PC Blend on my Prusa MK3S eoth the hardened steel nozzle. I had to increase the nozzle temperature by 5 to 10C. I also print within an enclosure as I print large parts and warping is possible without an enclosure.

  • @AzaB2C
    @AzaB2C 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice! Liked before watching, always a pleasure watching your edutainment content. Cheers!

  • @Dave-gf3kd
    @Dave-gf3kd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent as always!

  • @davidg5898
    @davidg5898 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'd love to see a comparison of nozzles made of different materials. I never really gave it any thought before, but you're absolutely right that different metals' thermal properties would affect the result.

  • @alexcourrau522
    @alexcourrau522 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I would LOVE to see a video with some comparisons of print strengths with different nozzle types. It surely makes sense that it would produce different results as the different materials nozzles would be made of have different specific heat values, and would probably transfer heat to the plastic in different ways.

  • @FedericoAlbano83
    @FedericoAlbano83 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks for the nice video as usual! I use a tungsten carbide nozzle and to me it was life changing: no thermal issue or difference with brass, but no wear out at all, even after kilos of PA-CF. I see you mostly don t mention tungsten carbide nozzles, but it is a superb addition to my machines

    • @malcolmm799
      @malcolmm799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      same, tungsten is the way to go

  • @henricoderre
    @henricoderre 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The perfect winding is what I noticed when you showed the spool of black PC filament. I thought you rewinded it that way. WOW. Compared to other filament makers this is really neat.

  • @theshiznojudge
    @theshiznojudge 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is why I use tungsten nozzles. Better thermal conductivity than brass (170w/mk vs 110) and it's naturally a hard material. I haven't done any strength tests of nozzle material and temp. Would be interesting to see the showdown.

  • @ronricardo1332
    @ronricardo1332 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Stefan,
    Thanks a lot for the informative video.
    I would like to suggest making a competitive video of creep resistance of different materials, as this is a very fundamental property for some applications.
    Keep up the good work, and thank you again.

  • @robertfousch2703
    @robertfousch2703 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just found this channel a few days ago...its awesome. I would love to see a discussion on 3D printing molds for vacuum forming, the pro/cons of various materials and how well they hold up after multiple pulls, deformation, materials with good porosity, thermal impacts from the heated plastic sheets of HIPS, PETG, and ABS.

  • @RCGrid
    @RCGrid 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Have you ever tried testing 3DXTech brand filament? They’re supposed to have some of the best mechanical properties for each type of filament they offer, along with the benefit of being easy to print

  • @lukesmith9059
    @lukesmith9059 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love these videos! On the topic of layer adhesion, have you tried testing samples printed in a heated chamber? Especially with these higher temperature materials, I would expect the layer adhesion to improve substantially.

  • @gunnerpetrea3531
    @gunnerpetrea3531 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have noticed the difference between nozzle types before with clear PETG. Using a nickel plated copper nozzle the print is glossy and semi-transparent, while using a steel nozzle the print has a matte look and is almost white instead of semi-transparent. There is also enough of an impact on layer adhesion that I can feel the difference with my hands on thin walled parts. I think the benefit of using a nozzle with higher thermal conductivity vs. just increasing the temperature is that a nozzle with higher conductivity allows you to print with a larger range of speeds during the same print. If the temperature is increased for a steel nozzle, the filament will start to degrade faster at slower speeds when the thermal conductivity is less of an issue. I am also not 100% sure that temperature is the only factor, since after increasing the temperature with a steel nozzle I looked at the top layer surface using a microscope and compared the steel nozzle to the nickel plated copper nozzle. To me it looked like the part printed with the nickel plated nozzle was much smoother at a small scale. Almost as if the rougher surface finish or higher plastic adhesion properties of the steel nozzle caused the layer surface to be rougher. This could then cause tiny air bubbles to get trapped inside the layers as the next layer is put down, reducing the layer adhesion strength.

  • @worldoflard
    @worldoflard 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for that review Stefan - I've been wondering when you would get around to it!
    I've made some fairly large prints using Prusament PC Blend, and found that even if I use a good covering of the glue stick, the part's tendency to warp is strong enough to actually curl the magnetic sheet up away from the build plate. I solved this problem by using bulldog clips - placing one at the very rear centre of the plate, and one each side at the very front - all places where it won't foul the Z-axis motors. I wait until the Z-axis has reached about 5mm before pausing the print and adding these clips (also removing the clip handles). This has given me some success with a part which is a triangular axle mount for a garden cart, about 190mm per side.
    It's amazing how strong this material is, and I have the carbon fibre variant on backorder as well!

  • @zakariakhamees
    @zakariakhamees 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Its definitely the thermal properties of the nozzle that affects layer adhesion. From your test, the brass nozzle almost got double the performance of the steel one for layer adhesion. This makes sense because the thermal conductivity of brass is about 110 W/mK compared to steel at 52 W/mK. Layer adhesion would even be way better if you used a copper nozzle because it's more conductive at 385 W/mK. I think you should make a video comparing few nozzle materials and see the results 👍🏻

  • @nezihmertbolgul3605
    @nezihmertbolgul3605 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    In my opinion, strength decrease due to steel nozzle is because of very low thermal conductivity of steels. Brass has about 120 W/mK thermal conductivity while steels has around 15-80 W/mK. I experience the same problem with my ruby nozzle and to solve that, i print slower and hotter then the normal brass nozzle with ruby. This subject could be a video topic for you :)
    You may want to catch up brass nozzle printed part's strength by slowing down steel nozzle printed parts speed and compare the results.

    • @Crazyates11
      @Crazyates11 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I had this same thought the other day. We know that printing hotter can increase strength, but too hot can degrade a filament. What about printing at the higher end of a temp range, but super slow? You want to melt the plastic as thoroughly as possible, but not destroy it.

    • @cruduskellies
      @cruduskellies 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wonder if a tungsten carbide one would preform the same as a hardened steel nozzle.

    • @erikhellman3974
      @erikhellman3974 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is the correct answer. For steel nozzles you have to increase temps 5-10 degrees and sometimes print a bit slower (depends on how fast you are already printing). I wish he had increased the temp for these tests

    • @haysoos123
      @haysoos123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@cruduskellies tungsten carbide performs almost exactly like brass, which is why I prefer it over hardened steel. It’s more expensive though.

    • @cruduskellies
      @cruduskellies 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@haysoos123 thats good to know! I definitely think I might do that.

  • @Marci124
    @Marci124 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I never realized how high PLA rates across the board in total. It's not very often that the "most basic" option is also among the best in most respects.

  • @rpavlik1
    @rpavlik1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would love to see more research into the nozzle differences.

  • @crystaldragon141
    @crystaldragon141 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'd love to see a series testing different nozzle materials. I'd also like to see a comparison of volcano style vs normal length nozzles with the same heater and orifice specs.

    • @alexlux147
      @alexlux147 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i'm curious about nickel plated copper nozzle, it should have more heat capacity and better heat transfer

  • @chuysaucedo7119
    @chuysaucedo7119 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video!

  • @brisance
    @brisance 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I've got a roll of this and it likes to warp, even in an enclosure.

  • @InsidiousDr9
    @InsidiousDr9 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Looking forward to the carbon version - unless it devours ends.

    • @bouvardc.2334
      @bouvardc.2334 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Get a hardened steel end. They dont cost much and work fine.

    • @brandonsmoot4056
      @brandonsmoot4056 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Most polymers don't bond to carbon fiber unless you get nano silica. It might make it weaker. Plus most carbon fiber filament is sketchy short fibers not medium to long continuous strands which would be stronger.

    • @seanwieland9763
      @seanwieland9763 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brandonsmoot4056 yeah, I’m not convinced the benefits of CF outweigh the cost or the wear and tear. Other polymer blends like PC-PBT look more promising, but I haven’t done a formal test like this.

    • @ivandrago4247
      @ivandrago4247 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Carbon is complete nonsense. We need glass filling.

  • @Dramaican88
    @Dramaican88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    For the nozzle material observation it has been observed in the past and mostly attributed to thermal conductivity. I think it is a combination of thermal conductivity, thermal capacity of the nozzle material and internal surface finish. The process of hardening the steel after machining I think affects the internal surface finish. Less smooth finish internally for the nozzle usually means less fully melted material. You can easily get matt finish PLA prints with a hardened steel nozzle because of this. This is also why I think nickel plated copper nozzles are the best type of nozzles for engineering materials that are not abrassive. It would be interesting if you compared E3D nozzles brass, nickel plated copper, hardened steel, nozzleX and slice engineering vanadium nozzles. Also looking forward to the PC CF Prusament results.

  • @VincentGroenewold
    @VincentGroenewold 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Liked before watching as I'm super interested using this for house projects, but was waiting for the CNC torture tests. :) I always print with a steel nozzle actually, needs more tuning but once done seems fine for me.

  • @gorgonbert
    @gorgonbert 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looking forward to your investigation of the brass/steel nozzle phenomenon 🙏

  • @cruduskellies
    @cruduskellies 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I saw a Sidewinder X1. That makes me happy.

  • @michaelhinojosa9665
    @michaelhinojosa9665 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    looking forward to the carbon fiber version review. the finish looks beautiful

  • @garagecedric
    @garagecedric 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really like it for automotive use, better temp capabilites than abs/asa, strong, easy to print (in enclosure), not hygroscopic like nylon (big plus), cheap compared to similar spec materials etc, preordered the pccf version to get additional temp properties, looks promising.

  • @Nerlin
    @Nerlin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    For the hardened steel, I thought you need a higher temperature to get the same results.

    • @yathani
      @yathani 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes, 5 to 10 C above brass.

    • @spedi6721
      @spedi6721 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I use a hardened steel one for carbon filament. Printing my standard filament, I have to raise 5 to 10 degrees and also reduce the speed a little bit to avoid clogging

    • @wervelstroom
      @wervelstroom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For PC Blend 10C higher

    • @CNCKitchen
      @CNCKitchen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      There are some rumors but I haven't stumbled upon any real data.

    • @severdislike4222
      @severdislike4222 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@CNCKitchen what I am hearing is "I have a new materials testing video for hardened steel nozzles" coming out at some point in time!

  • @seanwieland9763
    @seanwieland9763 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is great! Would also like to see a review of PC-PBT. So wonderful to see the 3D printing community finally start to take polycarbonate blends seriously - especially for functional parts.

  • @powersv2
    @powersv2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now I have to go back and watch the PC+ABS blend filament you made to see how this stacks up.

  • @bentlikeitsmaker
    @bentlikeitsmaker 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love my carbide nozzle

  • @mrclown7469
    @mrclown7469 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    If the steel nozzle is hurting layer adhesion (presumably) due to lower thermal conductivity compared to brass, I wonder if a nickel plated copper nozzle would do the opposite 🤔

    • @Sembazuru
      @Sembazuru 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Intriguing hypothesis. I haven't looked up the thermal resistance values to see how close (or far apart) they are.

    • @alexanderdaum8053
      @alexanderdaum8053 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Sembazuru Copper is the most thermally conductive material with a thermal conductivity of about 400W/mK. Brass has about 120, but depending on the specific alloy it could be different. For steel it is hard to say, since it really depends on the alloy, but should be more in the range 30-60

  • @robbryan3044
    @robbryan3044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Another great informative video. However, in watching it...particularly having switched between the brass & steel nozzles...an idea popped into my head.
    I'm certain that the great majority of those watching your comparison videos greatly enjoys the material comparisons...but, I have a strong feeling that there are others who, like me, would really like to see at least one video comparing nozzles, especially in regards to the most popular/common filaments. A perfect example would be the Olson Ruby nozzles.
    People are familiar with the standard brass & steel nozzles...but, they're probably less familiar (many not even knowing anything about) the various Olson Ruby nozzles, such as the one made with brass, and the one made using a copper alloy. While these 'specialty' nozzles were originally created for use with more abrasive filaments (such as those containing carbon fiber), I don't see why they couldn't be used with the more common (PLA, PETG, etc) filaments.
    So...how about it? How about doing some nozzle comparison videos, comparing at least one (probably the brass) version of the Olson Ruby nozzles against the 'standard' brass & steel nozzles?

  • @SodalisUK
    @SodalisUK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Stefan's scientific approach is extremely valuable - and so far at least apparently unique. Those is the "go to" channel for genuinely science-based reviews.

  • @dertarr8208
    @dertarr8208 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, Stephan! You mentioned that there should be a video about CF-PC that you were preparing in between!

  • @JorgenLarsson
    @JorgenLarsson 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I also wold love to see a comparison between different types of nozzles in the same dimension. Hardened, brass, brass with coatings and the ruby nozzles.

  • @percurious
    @percurious 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Still no "CNC Kitchen™"? ;-)
    Congrats on the trademark and on your contribution to the community being acknowledged by Angus in his latest video!

    • @percurious
      @percurious 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      P.S. i am all for deeper investigations into the nozzle material impact!

  • @AleksandrEfimov
    @AleksandrEfimov 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I read somewhere that steel nozzles may transfer heat a bit worse than brass, so it's useful to increase print temperature by 3-4 degrees to make them work properly

  • @Sembazuru
    @Sembazuru 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Prusa claims that their PC Blend can be annealed for better temperature resistance. It would be interesting to see how the other physical properties are affected by annealing and how annealed PC Blend compares to annealed PLA in the thermal test.

    • @liamthepyro
      @liamthepyro 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think he made a video about annealing PLA in an oven a while back

  • @MeMyselfAndI33
    @MeMyselfAndI33 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stefan... Respekt !!
    Sehr lehrreiche und professionelle Videos !!
    Auch die Tests, die du machst sind gut und nützlich.
    Neben dehn-, biege-, kerbschlag- und temperaturfestigkeiten vermisse ich die Abriebfestigkeiten im Vergleich unter den compounds.
    Ganz speziell wurde ich dir gerne folgende Fragen stellen:
    - Welches Filament würdest Du für z.B. Zahnradflanken verwenden, die einer hohen Reibung ausgesetzt wären?
    - was muss ich beim Kauf eines Druckers beachten und dieses Filament benutzen zu können
    - welche modelle an 3d Drucker kannst du empfehlen

  • @properprinting
    @properprinting 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting video! I had similar issues with hardened nozzles. Even standard Nylon became brittle and weak. Therefore I use Microswiss's plated nozzles mostly or DyzeDesign's tungsten nozzles. The latter don't fit a regular hotend though. I haven't tried the ruby nozzle yet which might be interesting to put to the test.

  • @Hallslys
    @Hallslys 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your experience with a hardened nozzle is very similar to my own. I thought i could have one nozzle on my printer and print everything with it, but i had horrible underextrusion with a hardened nozzle and PLA. The PLA also came out way more matte than with my brass nozzle. Two things help, either slowing down speeds or increasing temperatures. But they don't fix the problem.
    Now i switch between nozzles when i need to print fiberfilled materials or regular materials. I also always increase my temperatures and reduce my speeds when printing with the hardened nozzle.

  • @paulherman5198
    @paulherman5198 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the PC Blend. I have a roll of Prusa Orange PC. I print it on my Mini. My bed is already toast, but I still use gluestick

  • @anthonyl.4713
    @anthonyl.4713 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Stefan, thank you for those amazing test you give us, I am a big fan of your content and hope you enjoy doing this as much as i like watching your video :-)
    Do you plan to add elasticity / plasticity and hardness test for all thoses materials you show us ?
    You allready test the bending for the stiffness but it does not show the ability of the material to endure non permanent deformation.
    I think that it would be great to have thoses numbers for chosing the best material to print springs or gears
    Have a great day.

  • @squidcaps4308
    @squidcaps4308 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    110% agree with engineering materials to be offered in 500g spools. It would make it affordable as the most common way to use them, i think, is to print PLA part first, iterate the design using cheap materials and then print it once with the proper one.

  • @shitposter4688
    @shitposter4688 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The nozzle difference probably stems from the different thermal conduction. The gap could be closed via longer nozzles, as found in the volcanoe hotend, though, I think.
    Nice video!

  • @shenqiangshou
    @shenqiangshou 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I definitely encountered the same difference when going from brass to hardened steel nozzles. In my own testing, I had to up the temperature 20C in order to get similar results. For example, normally I print PLA at 205C, but switching to HS nozzle, I'd up it to around 225C. When I first encountered this I was very surprised. I ended up making up two identical hotends that I could quickly swap between on my MK3S in order to do back to back tests, same gcode, just different nozzle. And yeah, that's when I isolated it down to the HS nozzle being the cause of the poor layer adhesion.

    • @internettoughguy
      @internettoughguy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brass and hardened steel conduct heat differently. That's why.

  • @physicsquack7660
    @physicsquack7660 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Prusament PC Blend parameter settings works wonderfully for Inland PC also.

  • @alexanderthomas2660
    @alexanderthomas2660 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'd really appreciate an in-depth test between brass and steel nozzles. I've always had the feeling that I need to print hotter with my hardened steel nozzle to maintain a similar layer adhesion as with brass, but it's all guesswork and it would be nice to see this quantified!

  • @WanderCampesino
    @WanderCampesino 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stoked!

  • @santiagoblandon3022
    @santiagoblandon3022 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm super eager to watch the carbon fiber PC test!! :D :D :D Thanks! keep it up!

  • @overbuiltautomotive1299
    @overbuiltautomotive1299 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video be blessed

  • @cfgosnell
    @cfgosnell 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would have been really interested in the weight of the filament before and after the dehydrator exposure. Thanks for the info!

  • @physicsquack7660
    @physicsquack7660 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The thermal conductutivity of the nozzles is the reason for the different layer adhesions. The steel nozzle has a much lower thermal conductivity preventing the same exit temp of the filament leading to lesser layer adhesion, and it causes the material to flow less easily making the brass nozzle produce more "dense" parts from amount of filament extruded.

  • @bleach_drink_me
    @bleach_drink_me 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would be cool to see if the CHt clone steel nozzle has the same effects.

  • @cander58
    @cander58 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I recently installed a hardened nozzle with a silicone sock. Reduced strength from a lack of "ironing" and direct heat transfer was a concern and it appears my concern was correct. Hopefully we can continue innovating to improve performance from more durable nozzles.

  • @3DMusketeers
    @3DMusketeers 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great comparison between brass and hardened steel. because steel does not conduct heat as well, this is expected. It is also why we run the hardened nozzles at least 10C above their brass counterparts!

  • @matkilla454
    @matkilla454 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You should get a tungsten carbide nozzle, it has a similar thermal conductivity to brass but is harder and more abrasion resistant than any steel.

  • @Oddman1980
    @Oddman1980 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for doing these tests - almost all of my prints are blunt ugly and functional, and I'm always looking for strong materials.

  • @cedriceveleigh
    @cedriceveleigh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm looking forward to the review of PC Blend Carbon Fiber.

  • @qwewer6
    @qwewer6 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would love to see a comparation between a brass and some other type of nozzle material.

  • @BenCos2018
    @BenCos2018 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Noice
    Another prusament video
    I definitely need to get some of this

  • @TheAruruu
    @TheAruruu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    For testing the nozzles, it would be interesting to see not only how the material of the nozzle affects the prints, but also how much each type is affected by other factors including fan speeds, silicone socks, bed temperature, and enclosures and heated enclosures. I know this would result in many, many tests, but it could result in finding a combination that creates significantly stronger prints.

  • @patrickrenschler5972
    @patrickrenschler5972 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hi Stefan, love the content as always. Are you still planning on a prusa CF filament review? (Maybe you covered it on patreon already I need to check there still).

  • @rubendariovelez
    @rubendariovelez 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    yes, the thermal properties are really different, with brass nozzle i use 235 and for the steel nozzle 245/250 to get the same strength.

  • @NormalFerrari
    @NormalFerrari 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video

  • @Todestelzer
    @Todestelzer ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s now a favorite of mine. Use it in a dental tool cleaning machine.
    PC-CF (also from Prusa) got soft and my PA was to expensive (75€, 500g).
    My last 2 spools came without glue sticks 😢

  • @jeroentorfs113
    @jeroentorfs113 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, i’ve done some printing with a hardened steel nozzle and noticed i had to up the temp about 10-15*c to get simular layer adhesion as brass nozzles

  • @PeterAcrat
    @PeterAcrat 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you 👍🍺

  • @A_Tempest
    @A_Tempest 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've been using the Fibrelogy Nylon12 CF 15 blend and it's outperforming everything that I've used so far, my main issue is extremely rough texture on the first few layers and any overhang. I'd be really interested to see a test from you on this filament

  • @MarkoFQ
    @MarkoFQ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to see comparison with enclosed ( if possible heated chamber ) That would be interesting to see. Since everything is done on open air, it would be great find to see difference in strenght depending on ambient ( enclosure ) temp. And with engineering materials I think that is a must.

  • @pixxure1
    @pixxure1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The review of the CF version of this never made it online?

  • @Peter_Schluss-Mit-Lustig
    @Peter_Schluss-Mit-Lustig 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One filament i'd suggest for an upcoming test is Fil-A-Gehr PPA (polyphtalamide) offering high strength and chemical-resistance at around the price of PC

  • @Supperconductor
    @Supperconductor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I'm very curious how a volcano nozzle would impact this material!

  • @_Livefreeordie_
    @_Livefreeordie_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hope you do some testing with more nylon filaments in the future

  • @philipp2104
    @philipp2104 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ich hab schon einiges mit prusament PC gedruckt und bin extrem happy damit. Das Thema brass - Steel ist sehr spannend. Bitte untersuchen :-) Und bitte infos zum PC CF von PRusa :-) habe schon eine Rolle bestellt. hatte bsiher nur PETG mit CF und fand die oberfläche immer sehr schön. Hoffe das das bei PRusa auch so ist. und vor allem das es weniger warping gibt.
    Danke für deine Videos sind wie immer sehr sehr hilfreich.

  • @gusmartin6053
    @gusmartin6053 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You should test PVP Polymer (Polyvinylpyrrolidone) as a bed adhesion material. I have been using this for quite a while and it works great on ABS, PLA, and PETG. I haven’t tested other materials. Most impressive is ABS. It will not separate from the bed until the bed has cooled close to room temp. I use standard bed temperatures that you would use with a PEI print surface. Apply the PVP to a PEI bed or better yet use Garolite as the print surface. I dissolve 0.2% PVP in denatured alcohol by weight, then simply wet the bed with this solution and let it dry. PVP is available in powder form as cosmetics materials. You can even get it from Amazon.

    • @MG-ct5ju
      @MG-ct5ju 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      generic glue stick are actually PVP/PVA

  • @remthompson
    @remthompson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I've heard before that with Nylon drying it prior to printing creates best results for quality, but in the printed state to achieve best results, the printed part should be allowed to reabsorb moisture prior to use. Is it possible there is a similar property with PC?

    • @BRUXXUS
      @BRUXXUS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe? Although, this stuff seems to have been designed not to absorb much. Worth thinking about, for sure!

    • @steffenb3306
      @steffenb3306 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      PC will not improve its properties after printing by absorbing moisture.
      Nylon indeed does not improve uts properties. It just loses stiffness and therefore is less brittle.
      Which may or may not be an advantage, depending on your application.

    • @csdstudio78
      @csdstudio78 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Been printing with pc blend for over a year, it sits out in my basement with no moisture issues. I love this stuff.

    • @CNCKitchen
      @CNCKitchen  2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Water is acting as a plasticiser in Polyamides, so it makes them tougher. Afaik this is NOT the case with PC and also the overall moisture uptake is way smaller.

    • @steffenb3306
      @steffenb3306 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CNCKitchen Hey Stefan, ich hätte die Möglichkeit zu messen welches Material bei Prusa eingeblendet wird, habe aber kein Filament ;-)

  • @VastCNC
    @VastCNC 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really interested to see the PCCF results.