PC Cables used to be HUGE. Why?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 พ.ค. 2024
- Get 20% off DeleteMe US consumer plans when you go to joindeleteme.com/techquickie and use promo code Techquickie at checkout.
DeleteMe International Plans: international.joindeleteme.com/
Learn about those old gray PATA/IDE ribbon cables that were previously used to connect hard drives and CD-ROM drives.
Leave a reply with your requests for future episodes.
► GET MERCH: lttstore.com
► GET EXCLUSIVE CONTENT ON FLOATPLANE: lmg.gg/lttfloatplane
► SPONSORS, AFFILIATES, AND PARTNERS: lmg.gg/partners
FOLLOW US ELSEWHERE
---------------------------------------------------
Twitter: / linustech
Facebook: / linustech
Instagram: / linustech
TikTok: / linustech
Twitch: / linustech - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![[TH] VCT Masters Shanghai Swiss Stage DAY 5 // FPX vs TH | FUT vs LEV](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/r61uDZTmu44/mqdefault.jpg)
I remember taking a razor and separating all the strands in the IDE cables and then wrapping them in electrical tape to get the cables into a tube shape.
That’s badass
Whoo wasn't the only one!
I did that too, unfortunately the resulting connection was too unstable, so i had to trash it.
I too did cable mods like these but they only worked on IDE not EIDE. I have ready made tubular EIDE cables though that work fine.
I had some IDE cables (in their later days) premade as round. I always wondered why it took so long for them to be made round.
I'm old enough to see things I used new now being shown as historical tech quickies.
Do you remember Jumpers?
I remember switching away "how does it know which is which?!"
@@smalltime0 I remember the days prior to IDE, when we had MFM and RLL hard drives and it wasn't just the hard drive cables that were like these, we had floppy disks and tape backups that used ribbon cables also. Cable management wasn't really a thing as there was not much you could do other than rubber band the extra length but it was still a mess of wires.
@tbeehler I know what you mean. I'm old enough to remember when a "monitor" was a teletype terminal with single-pin dot-matrix print head that passed a current through the yellowish paper and literally burned a dot into it, computers used drum or the newer core memory, paper punch tape, no IC chips, and for long-term storage they used 32-track data tapes or the 14 or 24-inch disks. I've seen a lot of change in computers since the days of the IBM and UNIVAC mainframes. For PCs, I've used MS-DOS 1.0 up to 6.2, Windows 1.0 through Windows 10 Pro (for my own computers, I've used Windows 3.0, 3.1, 3.11FWG, NT4, Win 2000, Win XP, and now Win 10 Pro). My first PC was a Northgate 486 (not a "SX" or "DX", just a straight-up 486, with an extra socket for a Weitek math co-processor, and it had a 213MB SCSI-1 HDD (a friend of mine back then said that I'd never fill that up! Ha!).
@@smalltime0 Jumpers on the drive and even jumpers on the motherboard and add in cards like sound cards to do IRQ swaps! :)
@@tbeehler *shudder* IRQ, I'm not old enough for that to have been that big of an issue - until it was.
You dusted inside your computer and put the cards back in the wrong order. Reinstall the OS
They touched upon, but didn't answer "why is SATA that transmits just one bit at a time faster than the ATA cables which transmitted 8 bits at a time?"
It's not because the bits needs to be split and assembled. It's that they all needed to arrive at the same time at the destination within a tiny window. The higher the speed, the smaller the window. This meant that the buss transceivers needed to have the same drive capability and speed. The capacitance and inductance of the wires within the cable needed to be the same. The sensitivity of the receivers needed to be the same as well as their speed. And since getting an exact match on the speed was difficult to impossible, they needed to send the group of bits slowly enough that they would all arrive within the time window. With SATA, that speed synchronization was no longer required. And that meant that they could send the bits much closer together.
Technically the problem is just long wires right?
Thats hella interesting.
I guess that before, parallelization mattered more than the actual bits going through the wire itself.
More wires = more throughput.
Now im curious. Why not photonics? Why dont we have photonics sending memory from RAM to the cache?
I can't understand why ata cables can't work without synchronisation, but sata can? Why can't we apply the same synchronization method to ata caples and get much higher performance? Aren't sata cables inside have few wires what ended up syncing with each other? Because it's definitely not a single fat copper wire
More useful than a medium sized tech media company. Thanks!
@@ishouldhidemynamelmao345 Not quite. The problem is matching the delays between all those wires and the associated electronics at each end. Longer wire do increase the problems, but are not root cause. The closer the matches in propagation delays, the faster the potential speed. So, parallel is easier (just set all the data bits, then after a suitable delay, strobe the latch signal), but serial is much faster since there's no need to match the delays for 8/16/32+1 independent signals, although you do need to synchronize to the byte boundaries.
1:30 imagine if one day, instead of promising to tell us after the ad read, he just says “I’m not gonna tell you” and the video ends 😮 scary stuff 😅
You fool they read the comments! Now he's probably gonna try it in an future episode as a gag!!!
Fed…
What ad read 😂😂😂😂
@@JonManProductionsYep. Coming in April 2025
It's kind of funny how we keep alternating between varying levels of parallel and serial in the pursuit of higher speed. USB 1.0 and USB 2.0 only needed one pair of conductors for the substantial speed jump between the two. Then USB 3.0 came along and added more. Then further levels of USB managed to increase the speed of the same conductors a ways further, but now with things like Gen2x2, USB-C has added more conductors again!
USB 3.0 is the most stupid connector ever, so many problems with them....there are constantly bad contacts, compatibility between USB 2.0 and 3.0 doesn't work that well as it should work....someone shold be in prison for developing such connector with extra little pins and making original pins short. I gave up and I bought USB 2.0 flash disk again because it's reliable and works everywhere. Problem is with USB 3.0 male connectors, female connectors on your motherboard are not the problem.
@@PidalinI’ve never had a problem with the USB-3 connector, just the motherboard header which is designed with two long rows of tiny pins that are fragile so it’s hard to tell if the connector or pin is misaligned, or if you just aren’t using enough force. The “USB-C” header (there is no singular universal name for the header) which is basically just a better USB-3 header is so much better.
@@fallin5427 The Type C header can be more than just USB3 though - for example, it supports up to 18W of power by the standard, it can sometimes do USB Power Delivery, is usually USB 3.2 Gen 2 (i.e. 10Gbit) and it can support other USB alt modes (video, etc).
@@emu071981 yes, I’m aware. I intended to put a “basically” before “better USB 3 header” but forgot.
@@fallin5427 USB-C is reliable connector, there i sno problem with them and if yes, you can just put it there in other direction. But if you didn't have problems with USB 3.0, then you are lucky. Most of flash disks I had, had bad contact, so you have to play with that inside of connector to make it work and it's like that on all computers, problem is in that male connector, not in your PC.
This takes me back. The first time I ever built a dual-boot system, it used the Cable Select mode. I had Windows 98 on one hard drive, and some flavor of Linux on another. I actually installed a toggle switch in the front of my case wired directly to that CS line which allowed me to shut down, flip the switch, and boot off the other drive, as it would always boot off the master drive by default. No software bootloader required.
This is how it should work, I absolutely hate today EFI boot and windows boot manager which screws everything, you don't have anything under your control anymore.
@@Pidalin It was certainly a simpler time in the PC world. Well, all electronics I suppose. As a general rule of thumb I like to retain as much hardware control as is practical in any system I purchase or design. In the audio engineering world, digital mixers and audio interfaces are absolutely amazing, and I love them as much as the next guy, but there's a reason analog consoles are still in heavy use today. Especially in live sound.
@@donaldholden2090 Don't tell me about that, I am that guy who has "stupid" projector with no apps, stereo amplifier and big f*cking speakers 😀
I also keep a lot of older computer hardware because I am pretty sure there will be time when everything new will be that stupid and complicated, that you will just build some "ultimate Win 7" or win XP PC to play good old games with no internet and clients needed and screw that, life is too short, I want things which work and which are not constantly changing under my hands.
I don't even play games anymore on modern computer, because you start steam and you need 50GB update, so you go on internet to procrastinate and then you will forget that you wanted to play something, it's stupid.
@@Pidalin ...Projectors have apps now? I'm still rocking my Optima HD20 and a Technics SH-AC500D Dolby Digital decoder paired with some Logitech X-540 speakers. Hello brother.
@@donaldholden2090 Yes, there are projectors with Android TV inside. 😀 I have Optoma HD28e, when I bought it, I had problem with rainbow effect, but I got used to it pretty fast and now I barelly see it. But your Logitech speakers are a typical "gaming" stuff. I have Yamaha A-S501 + speakers Magnat Monitor Supreme 2002. 🙂
I can remember the round P-ATA cables. My friends looked at it like it was some kind of witchcraft
or alien technology.
I found one of those in my box of PC parts the other day. Oh the nostalgia trip.
Can’t wait to never deal with these cables ever again.
@KN.hilltop u good?
@@KN.hilltop lmfao this man stopped taking his schizophrenia medicine and is loosing it now😂😂
@KN.hilltop why tf did u have to mention netflix? trying to chase clout, arent u?
Wtf is this comment thread
Before SATA was coined, we never refer to them as PATA cables. They're referred to as "IDE" cables.
I wanted a rounded version of these cables, but they were expensive for my small student allowance, so I never bought it until they became obsolete.
I was thinking about the same, nobody said PATA cables, we all knew IDE cables and IDE hard drives
I've always called them IDE cables, NEVER, PATA....still call them IDE, that's what they are.
@@JuanDiegoPinillos some technonazis called them PATA, but that was in time when SATA already existed
100%
I never heard the term PATA before this video, I still refer to them as IDE. But I haven't used IDE in about 10 years now.
I can say that near the end of my using PATA cables, I used the round longer cables with no trouble at the full 133MB/s speeds. When I got my first SATA capable system, it took me a year or so before I got my first SATA drive. Once I did, I formatted it as my boot drive. My boot PATA drive became a storage drive along with the 120GB PATA drive I had set as slave on that ribbon. When the 40GB drive died, I swapped to a round PATA cable for better management, it was longer than 18 inches but it worked perfectly at full ATA speeds. I used that drive as a storage drive till I got my first SATA only system, and by that point I had enough SATA storage to not miss the PATA drive.
I remember way back when, when i would do a new computer build i would still include a floppy drive for the longest time, even though floppies were long obsolete. Why? Well the BIOSes that were on motherboards at the time: booting from usb, or even cd-rom wasn't always reliable. To flash a BIOS or to recover an OS, it was always rock solid reliable to boot from a floppy. Nowadays that obviously isn't necessary, but back then it felt weird to not have a floppy drive just for that reason
I did too. I even kept a 5.25" floppy drive going too for a lot longer than I ever really needed. Still it was pretty cool in the day I thought. I had both floppy sizes and a tape drive and a Zip drive and a CD burner and a DVD player and USB ports to plug in thumb drives all on one system. I wish I still had it just for nostalgia.
I still come across the occasional floppy disk in my boxes of storage from many moves ago, and I think I still have a 3.5" drive in one box that I kept "just in case" for 20 years longer than needed.
Also Windows recovery could be done through floppy.
@@gabrielpowers766 I remember backing up so much stuff to CD-ROMs. Since the Internet was so slow back then: 500mb of data was precious: that was like 3 days worth of download time. I had stacks of CDs from old backups.
I still have a running PC with IDE hard drive...
@KN.hilltop👍
Why? What would possesses you to use such archaic hardware?
Why
Still have a PC with IDE DVD-player.
I'm still running on ferrite core memory.
It's fun how terminology sometimes gets defined by confusion. ATA is the communications while IDE refers to a disk that has the disk controller built in rather than on a separate card. They are not synonyms. You could've had PATA disks that were not IDE. Of course nobody called it PATA, but that's sort of like how Chinese food in China is called food.
Were there? I was only aware of ATA and SCSI at that time. (Well and the cables for floppy drives that looked similar)
@@SmallSpoonBrigade You could get internal (non-SCSI) serial and parallel connectors, just to buck the trend. But you'd be hard pressed to find something internally to link them to.
I think Centronics ports saw limited use in enterprise configs for "hot-swappable" HDDs, before SCSI was really a thing
I'd forgotten about that distinction, but yes. I recall my first couple of builds had to have a hard disk controller card. Then IDE came along making it much simpler.
@@YoSpiff: Yes, when you connected the IDE disk to the motherboard, you were really connecting the on-disk controller card to the ISA bus. Fascinatingly similar in concept to modern M.2 or U.2 where you connect the drive directly to the PCI Express bus.
My first computer was a 386 IBM clone which had a virtual disk controller in BIOS. If you connected a non-IDE disk, you could go into BIOS and manually enter the number if platters, drive heads, cylinders per platter, and number of sectors per cylinder.
This was pretty cool because you could hide data using a little machine code to write things to the outer rings of the platters, then tell the BIOS that those cylinders didn't exist.
And when you wanted to hide more components and block the airflow even more than with PATA cables, you switched to SCSI. Combining PATA and SCSI in one case was a LOT of fun.
I used to manually strip apart my ribbon cables to bunch them together and cover in fluorescent electrical tape.
Had a black light cathode ray, light up like a Christmas tree in my Antec Super Lanboy case, was SICK!
Ah that's why I always wondering where's the jumper for set primary and secondary drive, I grow up with my dad building PC and this memory always vividly stuck on my mind everytime I move or replace sata drive, feels something's wrong.
I remember my dad teaching me how to set the M/S pins on an IDE drive, as though this was key information that'd set me up for the future, rather than an oddity that'd be obsolete in 5 years
Thanks for the memories. I'd completly forgotten about having to use jumpers on HD's way back when. It's amazing what you forget. My memories of using jumpers on the motherboard to overclock are more entrenched it would seem.
I had to buy an IDE cable less than a few years ago... Working on a retro PC build and realized I didn't have any 30 year old cables laying around 😂
I want to see a tech quickie going over battery myths. Like when you get a new device do you totally charge before first use? Then on first use discharge battery fully before charging again? Do you keep new batteries between 25 and 90% always? Lots of "best ways" out there but I'd like something more definitive.
The main reason for using parallel interfaces was the limit on switching technology at each end. To get the same throughput though a serial cable it has to be able to switch 8x faster for an 8 pin cable, 16x faster for 16 pin etc etc. High speed switching semiconductors were much harder to make, the wafer sizes were larger etc. Remember that the original IBM PC had a main processor clock speed of only 4.77MHz. This ramped up over time but all of this was incredibly slow by today’s standards.
You know you are old when looking a video like this brings a smile on your face!
Master and slave makes much more sense than parent and child.
They wouldn't be parent and child unless you were daisy chaining devices. Which some interfaces allowed in the past, these days not so much as hotplugging and multiple USB ports is far more common than it used to be. It used to be that you'd have a parallel port and a couple serial ports and then just ports for mouse and keyboard. If you were very lucky, there might be an SCSI port as well.
Since an IDE cable can only have two devices, master and slave aren't actually more sensible. Primary and secondary, or leader and follower, or main and auxiliary, would be much more descriptive. Also, the second device on the IDE chain doesn't actually take commands from the primary drive, but from the IDE controller on the motherboard. So it even makes less sense to call that one a slave drive to the master drive.
And I get it, it's often a bit of an annoyance to have to rewire your brain to accept new nomenclatures for already established ones, and the existing namings might indeed not be offensive to you. That's fine. It however apparently is offensive to others, so why go out of your way to be a bag, if you can simply use one of the many other perfectly usable and effective nomenclatures?
SCSI were also ribbon cables.
and up to 68 wires!
take that, IDE...
@@youdontknowme5969 IIRC, SCSI cables could also be longer with more devices attached as well. Unfortunately, all that stuff was a lot more expensive.
My dad keeps a special drive that moves to every PC he builds. I am pretty sure it uses these cables and its casing is see through plastic on 5 of the 6 sides with glass on the spinning drive side (he has this drive in center view of his side panel.
From when I asked about it years ago, he said he likes to see that drive spin up just because. So he went through the effort to keep it around in every personal system. idk what he keeps on the drive to have it spin up and down throughout operations, but if it brings joy.
0:05 dude I don’t even have to imagine that’s how it was back then. I still got those cables and hard drives 😂
Thanks for the video.. side note.. I never had any issues with the round cables.. I remember cutting the flat cables long ways and stacking the cable so it was thin.. that took some practice to pull off without damaging the cables..
I always wondered why those old thick cables were used in the computers of yesteryears. Increases my appreciation for the compact and efficient designs of modern systems.
I still have a PATA cable in one of my PCs. There are a couple of old CD/DVD burners with specialized firmware in it that are better with a couple of functions than anything newer I can find. They take only PATA connections. Since computers no longer have IDE ports, I use a PCIe adapter.
when i started out on computers one of the first things i learnt because i didnt know it was the Jumpers, no google or youtube just trial and error, now i cant forget it XD
Hey now, i have round IDE cables. …and no one ever called them “Pata” 😆
Same here, nobody called them PATA.
Building a Win98se machine with PATA... Been building since '94, never had a problem with them. The rounded cable had a metal sheath surrounding the cable that helped with interference. (03:11 you can see the braided sheath). Don't think I had one that went longer than 18", tho.
Used to have them that was bundled up and made of UV reactive material to "glow" in the neon tube lights we used to have in our computers lol.
Later round IDE cables, like the ones pictured came with braided shields. Personally, I had far fewer problems with the round IDE cables. It sure allowed for more space inside the case. Of course, during that time, floppy drive cables were still pretty common. They were another type of flat cable you might find.
PATA is a backronym though. It wasn't called that until after SATA came around. It was IDE
The term ATAPI was also used, mainly used to refer to CD or DVD drives.
I was never one to worry much about cable management. But I do remember the first PC I built with SATA and thinking, "gosh, that's nice." Those parallel cables were unwieldy. I do not miss them.
Ahh, memories. I still have an old computer sitting at my mom's house with an AMD Athlon X2 processor and good old pata cables, but only thing connected to it is the dvd drive in there.
Its funny what we tolerated back then in terms of speed, amazing what happens when you get spoiled with stuff.
20 years later, we will look back at today and wonder how we ever put up with slow NVMe SSDs, only mere gigs of RAM, and measly sub 100 core CPUs.
@@edthelazyboy Last year I finally upgraded my 13+ year old "gaming" PC, it had an i7-980, 12Gb of DDR3 1600, and a 780 ti directcu ii oc 3gb, I fortunely had one ssd for OS drive so at least I experienced that. I upgraded to an i7-13700K, 32gb DDR5-6000, 4070 ti trinity oc, and a Samsung 990 pro 2tb and an Samsung 980 pro 2tb.
To even say I got a huge upgrade is still an understatement! And now, my standard is this, and the spoiling continues lol.
omg anthonny, why dont we see him anymore,he always was super chill
SCSI was more fun, wide/narrow/ultra and don't forget to put on the terminators.
I do not miss the days of IDE origami. That is one craft project I'm happy we left in the past.
Yet we went back to parallel with the M.2 PCIe drives as transferring at the same time in both directions is quicker than having to wait for one side to entirely finish and the signal integrity issues have been solved already as it is just using the PCIe lanes on the motherboard. As PCIe supports both parallel and serial most M.2 PCIe drives are parallel though you still have a few that are serial.
WARNING: video may cause symptoms of nostalgia!
You could've mentioned SCSI cables which were 50 Pin and therefore even wider ;)
Also, an early 90s PC could have several kinds of these ribbon cables:
Floppy, Hard Drive (IDE), and CD-ROM (sometimes IDE, but often something proprietary that would connect to the sound card, like Mitsumi, MKE, etc)
There were exceptionally good storage alternatives back in the days ('m talking about proper workstations), SCSI (parallel SE or parallel LVD / HVD bus with active termination) and FC-AL (serial), both implemented on PCB backplanes with SCA80 / SCA40 device connectors so dealing with any (SCSI or IDE / PATA) ribbons was out of question (and the external links were quite neat by def.).
Do Not Cite the Deep Magic to Me, Witch
For we were there.
When it was written
I/O chips could not handle the higher data rates sequentially so they HAD to use a parallel interface to achieve better speeds. As serial speed increased, leading to increases in parallel, eventually the cross-talk issues with parallel caused more issues than serial speed limits...
Not only am I old enough to have used these cables, I still have the computers in my office.
I remember in the 90's as a kid they had ATA cables wrapped nicely like shown in the video that had cool colors and everything... Always wondered why I had such weird intermittent issues. This would have been helpful about 30 years ago. lol
And remember the even larger SCSI cables!!! It was always fun trying to get cables to reach without affecting the airflow.
Used to take a razer and tape or if getting fancy would get some tubing from Lowe’s and remove the connector and make rounded cables.
When the round versions of these cables became available, I used them pretty exclusively and if IIRC, never had any issues with them.
I've been around since the drives used 2 cables, data and signal, as used with MFM and RLL drives. My first hard drive was a 30 MB RLL drive, which cost me $500 with controller and I put it in my XT clone.
Being able to origami your cables around the case was a badge of honor and if you can't even manage the 90 degree angle, frankly how do you even dress yourself in the morning.
"I was there Gandalf, 3000 years ago"
I remember PATA and setting the jumpers on my 80 GB IDE HDD (master) and my data 40 GB IDE HDD (slave).
You won't believe the comedy show I had with those old PATA cables! I'm there, trying to soup up my computer, right? But I'm all thumbs with these rainbow ribbons. And guess what? I somehow manage to plug it in backward! Yeah, you heard me. Spent ages scratching my head wondering why my PC was acting up. Talk about a rookie move!
IEEE 1394 aka FireWire was also very good and fast at first but as USB got updated and FireWire wasn’t so much (but mainly because almost no one used it because it was more expensive), usb matched and then exceeded FireWire while also being the most widely adopted port
FireWire was mandatory when you were studying filmmaking back in mid 2000s, USB speed transfer was rubbish and FireWire was the only option for transcoding and recording video from a camcorder without dropping frames... I still remember the hazzle to make the camcorder to work properly as a video recording device on WinXP and Premiere.
@@JuanDiegoPinillos yeah, and that’s why most people in audio and video related stuff relied mostly on Mac because all Macs had FireWire by default
@@smokeduv I had to buy a PCI IEEE 1394 card, those were extremely cheap, as cheap as a 3.5 floppy disk drive
I remember being jealous of Macs that came with FireWire even though I never had a single use for it. lol
Had an external Seagate backup drive that had Firewire and, iirc, usb2. Much faster on the firewire. The Seagate drive died 👀(like always) but it worked fine for my WDs for years after that.
Don't forget the slightly smaller floppy disk ribbon cables. Also serial and parallel port connectors often had ribbon cables going to the motherboard.
I wondered if you were going to mention cable folding, it really did make a difference to airflow if you did it properly.
I'm one of those that had spiraled UV reactive PATA cables all over my 3 ODDs and 2 HDDs.
Good sir, I will have you know I still posses a bunch of PATA cables, two fully functional PATA hard drives, one PATA CD ROM, three PATA DVD burners, a motherboard with PATA connectors (and a floppy drive), AGP graphic card, a case where everything is mounted in, CRT monitor and a PS/2 mouse & keyboard. 🙂
Tldw version
Cables used to be big because they were parallel cables, where you had 8-16bits of data, addressing may multiplex using the same data lines, some handshake and control signals, lot more bandwidth since the data is moved the same way CPU or GPU would move it while a serial port requires overhead a buffer and bitshifting to take the same data and have in a format the computer can use and require external circuitry to do this
Nowadays the overhead and processing power needed for 2 or 3 uart lanes using differential signaling, your Usb serial port and SATA can move several gigabytes a within a few seconds
Though parallel cables like ide, scsi, etc have moved to the pci-e, nvme, and m.2 ports now faster than sata and USB
Now I understand what the IDE section in the BIOS is for, thanks guys!
My second computer(and several afterwards) were IDE.
Fair enough, my first computer used cassette tapes(a whopping 300 bits per second, or about 10 minutes to load a game) and ROM cartridges for storage so even a floppy drive would've been an improvement.
DFI Lanparty Motherboards came with round PATA cables in the box. I still have some fluoro orange ones in their bag.
Ever forgot to replace the backplate and wonder why the motherboard won't line up with the screw holes?
And now it's getting where you don't even need SATA. My brothers PC only has m.2 drives. No cables whatsoever.
I had always built my PCs. I remember when trying to make it look a little nicer and facilitate air flow, I bought the "tube" version of the ribbon cables but was frustrated with the drops in connection.
Ah. The days of jumpers. Those were fun.
Ahh IDE cables. The kind of retro nobody misses.
For 25 odd years I’ve always said P-AH-TA and S-AH-TA - now teaching my 6yo to read I can see why it’s described as P-AY-TA and S-AY-TA 😮
TBH, I think the insistence on making everything into an acronym is an indication that folks are younger. Making SCSI, ATA, SATA and IDE into acronyms isn't so bad, but I'm not at all sure how you'd do that with PCMCIA. (People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms, as in the expansion interface for laptops before cardbus took over and was ultimately rendered obsolete)
0:53 "If you look closely at a PATA cable"...
Umm... That's not a PATA cable. That's a floppy drive cable.
Good to see the proofreading is still an issue.
Not really a proofreading issue, more of an "editor using the wrong stock image" issue. Nothing was wrong with the script, there's just no reason for that image to be in this video at all since they never discuss the difference between the 2 types.
A "proofediting" issue?
I had those "glow in the dark" wrapped things. Light in the dark but opposite of lightspeed 😂
DFI included rounded ATA cables
@@rzober89biologia I've still got some, new in their bag.
hot/mid30s take but I like ribbon cables. Easy to tell if damaged, interesting look. I also like the modern USB-C ribbon cables you often see in modern dual PCB controllers and similar small devices
Talking about master/slave jumpers gave me weird nostalgia
I bought my first PC brand new with PATA cables, does that make me old?
My first PC didn't even have PATA cables. In fact, it didn't even have a hard drive. It had a 5-1/4" floppy drive, and we had to "Please insert disk 2 to continue" booting IBM DOS.😂
Granted, I didn't buy it myself, as I was 7 when we got it. It was a Commodore PC1. The first three orso PCs I bought, indeed had PATA disks, and it's quite possible I still have a ribbon cable or two in the attic, seeing how long I haven't done a good purge of old trash out of there... 😛
@@HansStrijker If i may ask, what year was that, i think i bought my first PC in 1999 or 2000, it has Windows 98 on it
@@floridaboz1 I'm fairly sure the Commodore was Christmas 1987, though it might have been the year prior. And the first computer I bought was.... Not exactly sure but second half of the 90s. I don't even know which processor it was, but I do remember having to (or, more wanting to) recompile the Linux kernel to get all the features I wanted in.
Then around 2004 I believe? I got an Athlon 64 as the previous one got toasted by a power surge due to lightning. My final _desktop_ with a PATA connector was an Intel Core2Duo E8400, and my final _computer_ with one, was an AMD Phenom II X4 840. But that one I used as a Solaris file server.
And now that I listed them all, my gawd, I spent waaaay too much of my paper routes and other after-school job earnings on computers... 🤣😂
Great! I ALWAYS WONDERED how SATA could be faster than a whole bunch of wires. I looked at it like highways: A 4-lane highway will move far more traffic than one lane each way, especially when the farmer and his tractor have to ride to his neighbor's farm a mile away.
These were some of the things I really don't miss a bit. Along with fugly beige cases.
You forgot about the floppy cables! Those also used ribbon cables. 34 pins, I think. Oh, and the red mark went on the opposite side to the IDE cables.
The naming of master and slave at one point was change to Primary and Secondary.
I wrote my comment!
We just went over some minor signals and systems stuff in my digital circuits class. That stuff gets so complicated so so fast
Connecting early IDE devices was fun before the keyed cables and sockets came out. Finding Pin1 on the motherboard and devices was always stressful. I heard stories of fried motherboards and hard drives but thankfully never got my wires crossed.
Man, I remember buying my first set of round IDE cables to improve airflow. I thought I was brilliant for doing so. It did improve temps though.
I remember upgrading my PC with an Ultra ATA 133 controller that plugged into a PCI (not PCIE) slot.
I still have IDE HD and DVDROM in my PC , works great even in WIN 10
I doubt, but you do you
No way, my brother laptop with core i5 8th gen was completely unusable due to its slow hdd
@@mrbobgamingmemes9558 you can.,if you use it as secondary storage
4:17
so that 's what the cut wire is for 😮 i thought my cable was damaged
Those ribbons also look a lot like the extender ribbon I got for my video card,. which smelled like burning plastic.
I didn't specify which, it was the ribbon, but the card caught on fire last June so now it's both.
3:50 Oh! The HORROR 👹Trying to Figure out "Which FRIGGEN Jumper", Went were! (Different Brands, Different Spots)
& IF you lost the "Tiny Little" Jumper thingy! "YOU HAD TO 'JANK' IT", with Sticky Tape & a Piece of wire😮💨 Shit it Was just so Frustrating!
I had round IDE cables - they worked fine if you didn't buy a cheap one. No one called them PATA and no one called it device 1 or 0. It was master and slave
Yes.
Huh, cool. Now this is a mildly interesting Techquickie that makes you nod your head in agreement.
I wanna build a completely modern rig with the exception being that it's got a fully functional, full height 5.25 floppy disk drive.
Look I had to click on this because I was born in the 90's and just destroyed my mom's work PC by playing Legos with it. But then I put it right back. The clunky, huge parts were so fun to learn on! Now though it's even better! One of the very few things in this world that literally only gets better.
CABLE SELECT MODE! Hahahahhaha oh man, that's a good one.
The ribbon cable. Bringing back memories.
I remember when I opened my father's windows 98 computer, it had one of those huge cables
25 years with PCs, this is the first time I'm hearing the term PATA...
lol same, we always just called em ribbon cables (or sometimes IDE)
Yeah, I knew of the PATA term, but it really only came about once SATA came out, and most people just called them SATA and IDE cables to differentiate them.
@@Acorn_AnomalySame!
I've built plenty of PC's with the old Parallel ATA, starting with the AMD 386/40. So I guess I'm now I'm a "computer enthusiast of the time". *SIGH* I will admit I don't miss the ribbon cables or floppy disks. Also about to leave my last spinning platter behind with the build I am currently gathering parts for.
I'm working on a 486 pc and these cables were surprisingly more complicated than I remember. You could easily plug them in the wrong way. But get this, if you include both ends of the cable, 3 out of 4 ways to plug them in will not work. So painful 😅
good info thanks
Well before PATA there was ST506. It actually had two cables between the controller and the drive.
Or you can go the other way around and connect a sata to IDE adapter to a 1 TB HDD and throw it in your Xbox Original.
Also, once we assembled the PC, we never opened it again, so interior aesthetics weren’t even on our radar.