YES! Thank you so much Jared. I now have my road map set up and know where I am going with my camera equipment in the future. One question; I noticed that the exposure was in an auto mode, kind of like "auto iso" what setting is that? because I noticed you were in Manual mode but I can't seem to do that on. my Canon 7D MkII. Thanks again for this Jared, you really have answered a lot of questions I had. You Da Fro!
Any plans to do photo shoot (no video needed) with the Holy-Hebrew Trinity L Series lenses with adapter? I know you used big boy EF lens but thought I would ask. Others may be interested as I am. Thank you for your informative and fun reviews, as I look forward to them each day, I could watch for hours. 😀
I have made a considerable investment in Canon EF lenses. It is great to know the performance of the lenses does not fall off when coupled to the EOS R5 and R6 systems. Great video.....thank you Jared.
100%… My “holy trinity” is the EF 70-200 2.8 gen 3, RF 24-105 f/4, and 180mm macro (old as dirt)-or the Lindsay Adler kit as I like to call it… I LOVE my 70-200 and do NOT want to have to upgrade it. I couldn't care less about the weight. Honestly it makes it feel more solid in my hands. It's a mind-blowing beast of a lens and works amazing on my R. So glad to see the adapters are keeping up with the improvements in the R5 for when I switch!
Hi Jared, the fact you are shooting at *f2.8* 🟥 and the subject is *moving so fast* , this truly shows how accurate the new Canon is. Super impressed. ✅ If that focus system was not working correctly you would have so many focus issues at *f2.8* Add in the 3rd factor that you are also moving. ✅ Many people taking photos of these guys would have a problem keeping them in frame, these guys are speedy on the field ! Enough said. Amazing results. Canon's new focus system is so impressive.
Fast? This was not yet fast, try to look at some dog sports. That is FAST. I hope Jared will shoot some as well, I want to see how it will perform there
EXCELLENT recap Jared!! I have been struggling with the decision to buy the new EOS r6 ii and the potential need to get all new glass to take advantage of the camera's AF. Now seeing that I will be able to use my existing EF lenses & still get all the advantages that come with the new camera eases that decision. I can now fearlessly buy this new camera & adapter and then slowly, as budget permits, replace my older glass! Thank you for your excellent video's...
Great video! As a Sports Photographer, i cannot wait to shoot action with the R5! 45MP is perfect for Sports because we’re always doing a 50% crop, at least with the frames we send.
The more technical and practical challenge for football is locking onto the eyes of players who are wearing helmets during gameplay. It's a challenge to keep track of the active player through all the chaos of the play at 400mm ... much less to nail focus on their eyes through the grates of the helmet at f/2.8. This is one example where an advanced autofocus system would truly push most photographers, including many skilled professionals, to the next level. Either way excellent test by Jared and impressive results from the camera.
It's a fair point in the case of football, and the Sony A9 handles it well. But given how well it appeared to lock on and track in these tests I feel good about my R6 pre order.
It just amazes me how fast the autofocus has developed over the last few years. It makes fast and wide open lenses practical to shoot wide open. I've started shooting most of my portraits sessions at f1.4 because I can reliably hit eye focus. Looking forward to when school sports comes back!!!
I mean you could do that in 2008 too if you had Nikon, their AF was top tier back then, Canon was playing catch up game and Sony was nowhere until Sony A7III came. Samsung also had really good autofocus with the NX1 in 2013.
@@SterlingSteves1 Eye tracking has been a thing for last 40 years, not sure if you honestly think autofocus has been invented yesterday. Nikon D750 was the first Nikon body to have face and eye detection AF. Samsung however had it since 2010 although it was not very good until NX1 came out. But I was specifically talking about the year 2008, Nikon in 2008 had the best AF systems, thats a fact.
I've heard more than one person describe the adapter as an "upgrade" for EF lenses because the mirrorless autofocus is that much better. Even works great with the venerable 50 f/1.0.
Thank you for this video. I wanted to move to mirrorless but wanted to continue using my EF lenses. This video certainly helped with that decision. Well done!
Being so generous as to provide the raw files for us really helps me make a descision on whether or not to purchase the Canon R series camera. Thank You for that! You have a new fan her.
Canon has come a huge way from the Eos R. Looks every bit as good as Sony's tracking to me, and the R6 had plenty of resolution. It will be interesting to see what Nikons next mirrorless cameras can offer. They need to step up if they want to stay relevant. Thanks for sharing the images.
@@fireburn56 Nah, this can do whatever Sony camera can do and even better because none of Sony camera capable of bird eye tracking yet. And combined with better IBIS, Canon is better.
Thank you Jared. I just got my R5! And I have Canon EF Lenses. Nice to know that I do not have to duplicate RF lenses, and that the EF lenses will work just as well with the adapter.
You did real good Jared. This video puts to rest a lot of internet hogwash concerning the AF tracking of sports by these two cameras. No doubt they are awesome machines and the proof is in the images. Appreciate it man.
Im a very very happy camper since I do own both the EOS R8 and the Sigma 70-200 2.8. Can t wait to field test it during the Sports games of the kids. Great you tested it also already.
Wow, not going to lie, those EF lenses performed really well adapted to the R5/6. I think you just sold Canon a whole lot of these bodies to legacy DSLR users who perhaps were on the fence thinking they'd have to invest heavily in new RF glass to gain any benefit. On this performance many R5 and R6 owners could consider never buying RF lenses and just sticking with EF glass forever lol.
Who wants to see head to head... Canon R5 adapted glass 400 2.8 III vs Sony 400 2.8 Native glass... hit the like button so Fro will know we want this next... :)
@@bjure8111 when I had the Sigma 150-600mm it would have come close to the video seen and the Sigma is a notoriously slow lens. A 400mm f/2.8 prime, yes, it would do what we saw on the video on a a9.
Yeah I gotta graduate to the R6, I'm beyond frustrated with my RP, and I do use it professionally, but I don't trust its autofocus or battery life any longer. Still love the RP, I can do so much with it, as I did my 70D but I'm ready for it, Jared! And it has 1080p at 120, and I'm sure 1080p on the R6 is sharper than the RP, I love 1080p and I make it work for me all day long. I am a hybrid shooter and these videos have me sold. Thank you, Jared.
I would love to see some wildlife or sports photos with the 100-400 mkII together with the 1.4iii extender. Just wondering if it has the same speed focusing for BIF or sports
This is the best video I have found covering this subject, so far. Thank you for this, it will help me move forward with the purchase of this camera. Thanks!
Any plans to do a photo only review using the Holy/Hebrew Trinity EF L Series Lenses? Others maybe curious as well. Thank you for your consideration. I truly Look forward to all your reviews.
longliveclassicmusic still... my R doesn’t overheat, what’s your point? Neither did any previous entry level canons. The overheating issue is an issue no matter what color you try to paint it🤦
@@Sticky745 my 600d does overheat at 1080p..... so what are you saying ? are you just not good at filming that you need 8K 120pfs all the time for your lack of skill ??
thanks very much Jared for making this one!! this clears lot of doubts about using ef lenses on R5/R6. very impressed to see ef lenses working equally well.
Awesome stuff Jared, still looking for someone who could test this out on a car environment , preferably drift and autocross since there is a lot of back and forth and side to side movement, also testing the hours and amount of pictures taken and then switching to video to see if the camera would allow you to record anything at all. Thanks guys!
Jared, thanks for the reviews. The one thing I would like to see is a comparison of the R5 to R6 with the same real scene - no test charts. I'm trying to decide between the R5 or R6 and it really comes down to resolution so is it significant enough to shell out the extra $1,400? Thanks,
For my EOS RP I habe all three ER-RF mount adapter and I use them with all my EF/EF-S lenses - all lenses are working well with adapter on the RP without losses in function or picture quality - as you shown in your test and your sample pictures. The R6 sample pictures confirm me in my decision to buy me the EOS R6 soon.
I'd very much like to see how well it can eye/face detect through helmets/facemasks (football, hockey, lacrosse, etc.) I'm concerned the darker light and lower contrast plus plexi or grid face guards might create problems.
Thank you Jared you saved lots of my money invested in EF lenses ... Yes I have lots of EF L series lenses and I was confused on EOS R5 but this video really help me out to make a final decision of buying the R5 even though you have shoot continuesly I can see that most of the photos are razor sharp .... Well so as a wedding photographer I am now sure that none of my photo will be out focused
Jared, please test IQ for EOS RF 100-500mm with 1.4x and 2.x teleconverters vs RF 600mm and 800mm lenses! If identical IQ then RF100-500mm would make a lot more sense (give flexibility of range).
Could you please test out the C-RAW files vs the RAW files on the R5? Is it hard to see any drop in quality and would be great to have files nearly half the size the sports etc?
Thanks heaps Fro from NZ. I have Tamron G2 Holy Trinity and trying to get the R5 so this video was a decisionmaker. Can't appreciate enough. If you visit NZ by any chance; you are staying at my place in Auckland and I will be your assistant for that period.
4 ปีที่แล้ว +4
Hi Jared, when connecting an "old" Canon EF lens to the adapter to my R5, I have a drop in frame per second rate. The H+ icon is blinking and is white now and not green. With the 11-24mm F4, everything is fine. But with my 135mm F2 and my 16-35mm F2.8 mk1 it dosen't look like it's working. I've try changing aperture, shooting mode etc... It works fine with electronic shutter tho... Have you got similar experience ? Love your content, greetings form Switzerland.
My thought also.. But when if we consider that Canon has been one of two top manufacturers for a long time, we knew that this would happen.. Wonder that what Nikon is doing.
Impressive, for sure. Though they did wait a long time before finally even releasing the RF system. I think they waited until the last minute knowing they had enough market share to get away with moving slower.
This really convinced me to switch to Canon mirrorless over Nikon mirrorless, from my current Nikon D7100 setup. I look forward to getting a Canon R6 Mk II in the near future.
What I need is A7sIII adapted with Canon EF test. I was looking to upgrade my EOS R, but with all this time limit issues I'm so confused! Any Canon shooter with the same questions?
@@marcelmuttner both 😅! 12MP A7siii stills is a downgrade, but most of my pics are for social media. I would love to have ibis and better AF , both R6 and R5 would be a good upgrade from the R, but the overheating is an issue shooting hybrid
@@byhyew too much money invested in EF L lenses. Just want to try the A7SIII and the sony system, adapting would be easier if I resolve to jump back to Canon
@@JamesLima 12MP is good for portraits but absolutely no go for wildlife or sports for me where you need heavy cropping. It is equivalent to almost 2x digital zoom from A7SIII which is insane. If you do 2x digital zoom in a7sIII with 12mp that will be become 3mp photo. I am not sure if you want to keep or share 3mp photo in social media. I won't
FWIW, I've got a R and only one RF mount lens (the 24-105L). I have a variety of Canon and 3rd party EF mount lenses and a few of the basic adapters, and they all work just fine. AF/MF, exposure, etc.all work flawlessly.
Thank you so much....I own a9ii - love focus. So many other things I just can’t warm too. Ergonomic comforts is huge as I have tiny hands, need balance with heavier long lens ..... a few other strong issues I miss that canon offers. I don’t care about brands, it’s a tool at the end of the day.
Thank you Jared for your review. Now, I’m really convinced to replace my faithful 7DMK2 by the R6 and keep a few of my L gear (24-70 f2,8 / 70-200 f2,8 (non-IS), 100-400 v2.
Thanks Jared! Before buying the camera, I really wanted to see the adapter is used and how my existing Canon, Sigma and Tamron lenses would work on the Canon R5. You just answered my biggest question about the camera. I am now 90% there, going to test the camera September 14 with the Canon
Man, if I were a Canon DSLR user still holding out on going mirrorless, I think this video would have convinced me. You can get the advanced mirrorless bodies without having to dump a ton of cash on new RF glass. Makes it pretty cheap to go mirrorless.
Of course EF lenses work on the R5 - excellently. My Canon 600mm 4.0 III and Canon 400mm 2.8 III are working like a charm on the R5 (and I guess then also on the R6). I see no difference from using these lenses on an EF Mount camera. No issue at all with Autofocus, specifically Animal Eye Autofocus. Stunning! Nothing compared to the Canon EOS R which was crap on this.
great video and awesome to know that the adapter just works!!! it would have been nice to see some of the more mainstream lenses rather than just telephoto, i have some of the F4 stuff i use a lot such as 17-40l and 24-105ii, would be cool to know that these still do their thing too.
I’m contemplating switching back to Canon from Sony. You can pick up some good EF glass now relatively cheap. For around $6K you can get a full set of EF 2.8 glass from 16mm to 200mm and the R6 body. That’s a steal in my opinion.
BOOM...BOOM....BOOM!!! That is crazy sharp. So glad to know my money is safe in my inventory of EF lenses, and that I don't need to migrate over to SONY but can buy me a Canon R5. Thx JP
Hey Fro, thanks! Like really really thank you a gazillion times. I’m still waiting for my R5 to arrive, and have been shooting the sigma 70-200 for almost a year. It’s 1 of my favourite lenses, and I was really worried how it would hold up with R5 and an adapter. No more stress :) Thanks BroFro, peace!
Thank you very much for this real world review. Showing adapted glass performance is critical for those interested in entering into the RF system with these cameras. Please make a review of EF-adapted glass for video auto focus performance.
Thanks again Jared, great to see the EF lenses perform well on the adapted mount. Seems no loss in speed or performance between the RF and adapted EF which is great news.
Great review!! OK, now the $1 million question, does that mean the R5/R6's AF is better than Sony now? It would have been an even more awesome review had you put your A7R IV in the same scenarios and compared it to the R5. Why don't I just get straight to the point, I would like to get your take on the R5 vs A7R IV, pros and cons and which in your opinion is the better camera? Boom, there I said it! That really is the bottom line.
Thanks much Jared. Love your content, and the way you present it. One question…which adapter model did you use for this test? Just curious as they offer a couple different models. Apologies up front if you addressed it and I missed it. Happy new year to you!
Having pre-purchased an R6 planning to use my EF glass with it this video made be breath a sigh of relief. I am basically a photo shooter looking to add the ability to do some quick hand held b-roll video shots as the situation presents itself. It takes way too long to break down my tripod setup and reset into my Ronin S gimbal. I’m hoping this solves my problem.
Did that answer your questions about adapted EF to RF lenses and if you lose anything in terms of focus speed?
Thank you! I wish canon would get product out for us to buy.
YES! Thank you so much Jared. I now have my road map set up and know where I am going with my camera equipment in the future. One question; I noticed that the exposure was in an auto mode, kind of like "auto iso" what setting is that? because I noticed you were in Manual mode but I can't seem to do that on. my Canon 7D MkII. Thanks again for this Jared, you really have answered a lot of questions I had. You Da Fro!
Thank you so much Jared. You are awesome !!!!!
Perfect! Thank you.
Any plans to do photo shoot (no video needed) with the Holy-Hebrew Trinity L Series lenses with adapter? I know you used big boy EF lens but thought I would ask. Others may be interested as I am. Thank you for your informative and fun reviews, as I look forward to them each day, I could watch for hours. 😀
I have made a considerable investment in Canon EF lenses. It is great to know the performance of the lenses does not fall off when coupled to the EOS R5 and R6 systems. Great video.....thank you Jared.
EF lens had not fall off since R and RP. Actually now with RF lens out, EF L lens are getting cheaper.
You are in a great position, with classic EF lenses you’ve already paid for and new bodies that can use them without any drop in performance.
100%… My “holy trinity” is the EF 70-200 2.8 gen 3, RF 24-105 f/4, and 180mm macro (old as dirt)-or the Lindsay Adler kit as I like to call it… I LOVE my 70-200 and do NOT want to have to upgrade it. I couldn't care less about the weight. Honestly it makes it feel more solid in my hands. It's a mind-blowing beast of a lens and works amazing on my R. So glad to see the adapters are keeping up with the improvements in the R5 for when I switch!
Will you be missing the agonising AFMA adjustements and still not getting it right at every focal length? ;)
Is also good to know that ef glass will hold its value considering they work so well adapted.
Coming from a DSLR user this eye and face detect technology is crazy. It's been out for years I can't wait to get ahold of one.
It changes the way you make photos, it's something completely different
We also have cars these days that are powered by electricity and phones that don't use wires or anything.
@@onlyonecannoli3952 Yeah, but cars can't yet detect idiot drivers and avoid them. That would be a cool feature. 😊
@@shaungibbs7400 just needs to avoid BMW-drivers.
Why would it have worsened ...
Seriously was looking for this video...thanks a ton.
This is what I asked for on your R5 eye AF comment section and I’m really happy to see this, thanks a lot !!
Hi Jared, the fact you are shooting at *f2.8* 🟥 and the subject is *moving so fast* , this truly shows how accurate the new Canon is. Super impressed. ✅ If that focus system was not working correctly you would have so many focus issues at *f2.8* Add in the 3rd factor that you are also moving. ✅ Many people taking photos of these guys would have a problem keeping them in frame, these guys are speedy on the field ! Enough said. Amazing results. Canon's new focus system is so impressive.
Fast? This was not yet fast, try to look at some dog sports. That is FAST. I hope Jared will shoot some as well, I want to see how it will perform there
Echoing the same sentiment, kids practice is not fast moving, try an Osprey going for a dive :-)
EXCELLENT recap Jared!! I have been struggling with the decision to buy the new EOS r6 ii and the potential need to get all new glass to take advantage of the camera's AF. Now seeing that I will be able to use my existing EF lenses & still get all the advantages that come with the new camera eases that decision. I can now fearlessly buy this new camera & adapter and then slowly, as budget permits, replace my older glass! Thank you for your excellent video's...
Damn, how long were you shooting for, those kids were like 8 in the beginning and like 20 by the end of the video 😂
🤣
Im gunna estimate 12 years, sounds about right.
That is dedication..
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@mikester1290 so I've had this camera for a decade now and here are my thoughts
Great video! As a Sports Photographer, i cannot wait to shoot action with the R5! 45MP is perfect for Sports because we’re always doing a 50% crop, at least with the frames we send.
I"m curious to know if the 45MP cancels out the bigger buffer capacity on the R6. The R6 also supposedly has a better low light sensitivity range.
Jeff Reichert buffet on the R5 is no issue.. I shoot RAW to CF Express cards and JPEGs to SD.. haven’t had an issue with buffer limit.
Jared nailed it like a boss!!!! I got exactly everything I was wanting to know out of this video. Keep up the great work fam!!!
Jared nailed her like a boss? Not sure that's politically correct these days.
The more technical and practical challenge for football is locking onto the eyes of players who are wearing helmets during gameplay. It's a challenge to keep track of the active player through all the chaos of the play at 400mm ... much less to nail focus on their eyes through the grates of the helmet at f/2.8. This is one example where an advanced autofocus system would truly push most photographers, including many skilled professionals, to the next level. Either way excellent test by Jared and impressive results from the camera.
Ahhh, you are talking about the game handegg. Ok, was shortly irritated.
It's a fair point in the case of football, and the Sony A9 handles it well. But given how well it appeared to lock on and track in these tests I feel good about my R6 pre order.
I also want to see how it works with shallow depth of field with people who wear glasses.
@@heiko4297 Yep talking about American Football :)
It just amazes me how fast the autofocus has developed over the last few years. It makes fast and wide open lenses practical to shoot wide open. I've started shooting most of my portraits sessions at f1.4 because I can reliably hit eye focus. Looking forward to when school sports comes back!!!
I mean you could do that in 2008 too if you had Nikon, their AF was top tier back then, Canon was playing catch up game and Sony was nowhere until Sony A7III came.
Samsung also had really good autofocus with the NX1 in 2013.
@@SMGJohn Nikon AF could find and nail the eyes in the subject in 2008?
@@SterlingSteves1
Eye tracking has been a thing for last 40 years, not sure if you honestly think autofocus has been invented yesterday.
Nikon D750 was the first Nikon body to have face and eye detection AF.
Samsung however had it since 2010 although it was not very good until NX1 came out.
But I was specifically talking about the year 2008, Nikon in 2008 had the best AF systems, thats a fact.
finally someone talking about the R6 (i have one preordered) and i’ll be using EF lens. double trouble
as a 5DIII User this is the kind of black magic I waited for to switch to...
The AF and IBIS sold me.
Now just wait for a sale^^
As a 5DIII use who did the upgrade to the R5 - it's incredible!!!!
I’m a 5diii user. Can’t wait for the price to come down and get the R5.
one year, buddy, one year and the r6 is going to be for us mortals too
Same here, i'm a 5D3 user too and is waiting for the R6. Canon did a really good job.
I'm going to try to hold out until the new tech sticker price drops. probably have to wait until after new years though
That EF lens adapter is gonna be the cheapest lens I’m gonna buy for the new mirrorless cameras ;)
ahhh yes, the cheapest lens ever lol
I've heard more than one person describe the adapter as an "upgrade" for EF lenses because the mirrorless autofocus is that much better. Even works great with the venerable 50 f/1.0.
Ha! The 50mm 1.0 👍
I like how you didn't beat around the bush and just got to the test. This approach to content creation is sadly lacking in many others.
At 5:29 you can see a bee that was caught in the frame too, just by the football. Bloody impressive!
Thank you for this video. I wanted to move to mirrorless but wanted to continue using my EF lenses. This video certainly helped with that decision. Well done!
Being so generous as to provide the raw files for us really helps me make a descision on whether or not to purchase the Canon R series camera. Thank You for that! You have a new fan her.
I suggest comparing stills extracted from the R5 8K video mode to still images taken with both the R5 and R6 in photo mode.
Nice showcase for both cameras. EF glass owners have to be excited. 👍
Canon has come a huge way from the Eos R. Looks every bit as good as Sony's tracking to me, and the R6 had plenty of resolution. It will be interesting to see what Nikons next mirrorless cameras can offer. They need to step up if they want to stay relevant. Thanks for sharing the images.
www.eoshd.com/news/chinese-user-modifies-canon-eos-r5-to-improve-heat-management-but-finds-artificial-firmware-time-limit/?fbclid=IwAR2vTNGx31RzM7mSg04rslPRi-EPckrLHPwv_7G238go3debOWDuSRlW3FA
As good? it's clearly better than Sony. See also how the IBIS works really well here.
Kusanagi Kyo better than Sony? They are catching up, but Sony with the a9 is a different level of tracking!
@@fireburn56 Nah, this can do whatever Sony camera can do and even better because none of Sony camera capable of bird eye tracking yet. And combined with better IBIS, Canon is better.
Kusanagi Kyo bird eyes tracking in BIF good luck with the blackout in the evf, canon r5 are good camera, but not for sport or BIF
congratulations for your tests of the autofocus systems, they are the only ones that give back the real sensations on the functioning of the system.
Northrup must be really jealous of that background blur...
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
so much Toneh
@@definedphotography all the Toneh
Exactly the review I was looking for. I am trying to decide on the R6 and all I have is EF glass. Thanks Jared!
It be interesting to see an A9ii(fe 400f2.8) versus R6(ef 400f2.8) match up.
Double Stuffed Oreoes. Hard not to like the seamless transition into the promo. Applaud.
This is insane. Thank you canon. And Jared.
Thank you Jared. I just got my R5! And I have Canon EF Lenses. Nice to know that I do not have to duplicate RF lenses, and that the EF lenses will work just as well with the adapter.
“8 Trillion times better than the Eos R.”
SOLD! Lol buying one soon.
You did real good Jared. This video puts to rest a lot of internet hogwash concerning the AF tracking of sports by these two cameras. No doubt they are awesome machines and the proof is in the images. Appreciate it man.
Jared: "This is an affordable lense"
Lense: $1300
its is compared to $3000 RF lense xD
@@joshuamaurer1194 haha
Im a very very happy camper since I do own both the EOS R8 and the Sigma 70-200 2.8. Can t wait to field test it during the Sports games of the kids. Great you tested it also already.
Wow, not going to lie, those EF lenses performed really well adapted to the R5/6. I think you just sold Canon a whole lot of these bodies to legacy DSLR users who perhaps were on the fence thinking they'd have to invest heavily in new RF glass to gain any benefit. On this performance many R5 and R6 owners could consider never buying RF lenses and just sticking with EF glass forever lol.
dunnymonster agreed. Got my trinity setup. This is why I waited for canon to catch up.
Well, not forever but a LONG time, no rush for sure!
The RF glass sits closed to the sensor on R series cameras. It is worth switching to the new glass.
It's awesome how fast the shots left in the top corner drain. Definitely fast camera's
Fro: 8 trillion times better than the EOS R
My 40D: o_0
Just upgraded my 40d to an r6... had that old work horse since 2008
The R5 is a fu***** beast. I‘m using it with the 28-70 and the results are STUNNUNG. Can‘t wait to get my second R5 with the 85 F1.2 L RF😍
Who wants to see head to head... Canon R5 adapted glass 400 2.8 III vs Sony 400 2.8 Native glass... hit the like button so Fro will know we want this next... :)
Honestly, based on this video, I'm not sure there would be enough of a difference for it to matter.
Why not a9 with the Canon 400mm? It can do what the R5/R6 do with adapted EF lenses.
@@Kallio1971 not even close... I have the A9.
@@bjure8111 when I had the Sigma 150-600mm it would have come close to the video seen and the Sigma is a notoriously slow lens. A 400mm f/2.8 prime, yes, it would do what we saw on the video on a a9.
@@Kallio1971 the a9 is really good with native lenses but can be painfully slow with canon, I know I had the a9 and a 500mm f4 usm II CANON
Yeah I gotta graduate to the R6, I'm beyond frustrated with my RP, and I do use it professionally, but I don't trust its autofocus or battery life any longer. Still love the RP, I can do so much with it, as I did my 70D but I'm ready for it, Jared! And it has 1080p at 120, and I'm sure 1080p on the R6 is sharper than the RP, I love 1080p and I make it work for me all day long. I am a hybrid shooter and these videos have me sold. Thank you, Jared.
I would love to see some wildlife or sports photos with the 100-400 mkII together with the 1.4iii extender. Just wondering if it has the same speed focusing for BIF or sports
Agreed- and the 2x, less money than buying the 600mm or 800mm f11 lenses since I already have that lens!
I wonder if the 1.4 teleconverter will effect the performance?
Any test done yet?
Hey Jared thanks for your email checking up on us. You are the GOAT photography channel on youtube!!! 👍
Holy shit the AF alone is enough for me to upgrade.
This is the best video I have found covering this subject, so far. Thank you for this, it will help me move forward with the purchase of this camera. Thanks!
JAAAAAARED POLIN, FROKNOWSPHOTOOOOOOO DOT COM
Ha ha! When you pointed that "bazooka" lens at the camera at the beginning, I put my hands up! That thing's a freakin' monster!
Any plans to do a photo only review using the Holy/Hebrew Trinity EF L Series Lenses? Others maybe curious as well. Thank you for your consideration. I truly Look forward to all your reviews.
Definitely we would love to hear the overheating times and limits from you Jared. Cause you be non partial with every camera man 🙏🙏
"It is 8 trillion times better than the EOS R"
My EOS R: o_0
I still love my eos r.. doesn’t overheat
stickyfingaz745 Neither does the R5 on LITERALLY ANYTHING except advanced video capabilities not included in the R. 🤦🏻♂️
longliveclassicmusic still... my R doesn’t overheat, what’s your point? Neither did any previous entry level canons. The overheating issue is an issue no matter what color you try to paint it🤦
@@Sticky745 my 600d does overheat at 1080p..... so what are you saying ? are you just not good at filming that you need 8K 120pfs all the time for your lack of skill ??
Even M6 mkii is better than R, right?
thanks very much Jared for making this one!! this clears lot of doubts about using ef lenses on R5/R6. very impressed to see ef lenses working equally well.
Awesome stuff Jared, still looking for someone who could test this out on a car environment , preferably drift and autocross since there is a lot of back and forth and side to side movement, also testing the hours and amount of pictures taken and then switching to video to see if the camera would allow you to record anything at all.
Thanks guys!
It’s great to see real examples of how well the EF adapted lenses work, especially in a constantly changing sports situation.
2:57 you can see the Canon or Sony money truck leaving for the Fro Factory 🤪. Actually it could be Pentax 🤭
The Devil is a Lie. Repent and Believe the Gospel of Jesus Christ. God has Real Love for you. Repent and seek Him while he may be found.
LOL! This actually made me laugh out loud.
I was specifically looking for this video, and of course Jared made it.
Jared, thanks for the reviews. The one thing I would like to see is a comparison of the R5 to R6 with the same real scene - no test charts. I'm trying to decide between the R5 or R6 and it really comes down to resolution so is it significant enough to shell out the extra $1,400? Thanks,
For my EOS RP I habe all three ER-RF mount adapter and I use them with all my EF/EF-S lenses - all lenses are working well with adapter on the RP without losses in function or picture quality - as you shown in your test and your sample pictures. The R6 sample pictures confirm me in my decision to buy me the EOS R6 soon.
I'd very much like to see how well it can eye/face detect through helmets/facemasks (football, hockey, lacrosse, etc.) I'm concerned the darker light and lower contrast plus plexi or grid face guards might create problems.
Thank you Jared you saved lots of my money invested in EF lenses ... Yes I have lots of EF L series lenses and I was confused on EOS R5 but this video really help me out to make a final decision of buying the R5 even though you have shoot continuesly I can see that most of the photos are razor sharp .... Well so as a wedding photographer I am now sure that none of my photo will be out focused
The AF and tracking of adapted Sigma 70-200 Sports on my Sony a7iii performed noticeably worse than native first-party lens.
Was it a Sony A mount Sigma with a Sony adapter? If not...there's your answer.
I was super surprised when realizing how well this works. Video AF with face tracking is absolutely wild.
Jared, please test IQ for EOS RF 100-500mm with 1.4x and 2.x teleconverters vs RF 600mm and 800mm lenses! If identical IQ then RF100-500mm would make a lot more sense (give flexibility of range).
Thank you for this valuable info on adapted glass as I have lots of EF lenses.
Could you please test out the C-RAW files vs the RAW files on the R5? Is it hard to see any drop in quality and would be great to have files nearly half the size the sports etc?
Thanks heaps Fro from NZ. I have Tamron G2 Holy Trinity and trying to get the R5 so this video was a decisionmaker. Can't appreciate enough. If you visit NZ by any chance; you are staying at my place in Auckland and I will be your assistant for that period.
Hi Jared, when connecting an "old" Canon EF lens to the adapter to my R5, I have a drop in frame per second rate. The H+ icon is blinking and is white now and not green. With the 11-24mm F4, everything is fine. But with my 135mm F2 and my 16-35mm F2.8 mk1 it dosen't look like it's working. I've try changing aperture, shooting mode etc... It works fine with electronic shutter tho... Have you got similar experience ? Love your content, greetings form Switzerland.
Gordon from Cameralabs demonstrated this in his recent vids.
@@mirasga Gonna have a look, thanks !
My EF L lenses work perfectly on my R. But that face detection tracking performance. WOW
Canon has caught with Sony in only it's second try,thats impressive.
My thought also.. But when if we consider that Canon has been one of two top manufacturers for a long time, we knew that this would happen.. Wonder that what Nikon is doing.
Me agree.
Impressive, for sure. Though they did wait a long time before finally even releasing the RF system. I think they waited until the last minute knowing they had enough market share to get away with moving slower.
This really convinced me to switch to Canon mirrorless over Nikon mirrorless, from my current Nikon D7100 setup. I look forward to getting a Canon R6 Mk II in the near future.
What I need is A7sIII adapted with Canon EF test. I was looking to upgrade my EOS R, but with all this time limit issues I'm so confused! Any Canon shooter with the same questions?
Photographer or Videographer?
@@marcelmuttner both 😅! 12MP A7siii stills is a downgrade, but most of my pics are for social media. I would love to have ibis and better AF , both R6 and R5 would be a good upgrade from the R, but the overheating is an issue shooting hybrid
@@JamesLima just get the Sony FE lenses. Adapted Canon lenses are more often than not hit and miss on Sony cameras.
@@byhyew too much money invested in EF L lenses. Just want to try the A7SIII and the sony system, adapting would be easier if I resolve to jump back to Canon
@@JamesLima 12MP is good for portraits but absolutely no go for wildlife or sports for me where you need heavy cropping. It is equivalent to almost 2x digital zoom from A7SIII which is insane. If you do 2x digital zoom in a7sIII with 12mp that will be become 3mp photo. I am not sure if you want to keep or share 3mp photo in social media. I won't
FWIW, I've got a R and only one RF mount lens (the 24-105L). I have a variety of Canon and 3rd party EF mount lenses and a few of the basic adapters, and they all work just fine. AF/MF, exposure, etc.all work flawlessly.
Is it just me or are jared's eyes flicking back and forth unnaturally?
It’s a medical condition.. forget what it’s called
Likely from reading his teleprompter...
@@AndrewPenner No no, he's not. He adressed the subject in an FAQ video if I remember well; it's a medical condition indeed (strabism?)
@@felixd6001 fair enough, I didn't know that! Thanks :)
It's called meth. Just kidding. It's only coke.
Thank you so much....I own a9ii - love focus. So many other things I just can’t warm too. Ergonomic comforts is huge as I have tiny hands, need balance with heavier long lens ..... a few other strong issues I miss that canon offers. I don’t care about brands, it’s a tool at the end of the day.
As long as you're not the tool...then it's all good.
Thank you Jared for your review. Now, I’m really convinced to replace my faithful 7DMK2 by the R6 and keep a few of my L gear (24-70 f2,8 / 70-200 f2,8 (non-IS), 100-400 v2.
Thanks Jared! Before buying the camera, I really wanted to see the adapter is used and how my existing Canon, Sigma and Tamron lenses would work on the Canon R5. You just answered my biggest question about the camera. I am now 90% there, going to test the camera September 14 with the Canon
Informative and helpful as always! Thank you Jared! Good luck and keep creating!
Man, if I were a Canon DSLR user still holding out on going mirrorless, I think this video would have convinced me. You can get the advanced mirrorless bodies without having to dump a ton of cash on new RF glass. Makes it pretty cheap to go mirrorless.
This was a very well done video. Just proof, not claims and assumptions. Great, thanks👍🏽👍🏽
The R5 and R6 are some seriously powerful cameras.
Wow, mind blowing & impressive camera (both)! Thank you Canon and thank you too Jared for this test!
That is impressive, it is worth buying these cameras just for the focus technology!
Of course EF lenses work on the R5 - excellently. My Canon 600mm 4.0 III and Canon 400mm 2.8 III are working like a charm on the R5 (and I guess then also on the R6). I see no difference from using these lenses on an EF Mount camera. No issue at all with Autofocus, specifically Animal Eye Autofocus. Stunning! Nothing compared to the Canon EOS R which was crap on this.
Although the R has it's fair share of fans, I agree it better to skip that one.
Thanks for this comment, was searching for eye af opinion.
Jared! THANK YOU. I’m gonna have this exact setup! R6 with the Sigma 70-200. Just what I was looking for and I’m PUMPED coming from my 5D3!
I saw this one fstoppers but came here to give a like to the TH-cam. Exactly the information we were looking for so thanks again mr. Fro man 👌👌👌👌👌👌
great video and awesome to know that the adapter just works!!! it would have been nice to see some of the more mainstream lenses rather than just telephoto, i have some of the F4 stuff i use a lot such as 17-40l and 24-105ii, would be cool to know that these still do their thing too.
Hi Jared, thank you for this video. I have several EF L glass. Your videos are awesome. Thank you for all the educaton and work you do. BRN
Seeing thru a 400 f2.8L is heavenly. 🥰🥰
I’m contemplating switching back to Canon from Sony. You can pick up some good EF glass now relatively cheap. For around $6K you can get a full set of EF 2.8 glass from 16mm to 200mm and the R6 body. That’s a steal in my opinion.
BOOM...BOOM....BOOM!!! That is crazy sharp. So glad to know my money is safe in my inventory of EF lenses, and that I don't need to migrate over to SONY but can buy me a Canon R5. Thx JP
Im shocked. A R5 and R6 video talking about photography and not video. One could think the two were photo cameras. 😂
Hey Fro, thanks! Like really really thank you a gazillion times. I’m still waiting for my R5 to arrive, and have been shooting the sigma 70-200 for almost a year. It’s 1 of my favourite lenses, and I was really worried how it would hold up with R5 and an adapter. No more stress :) Thanks BroFro, peace!
Thank you very much for this real world review. Showing adapted glass performance is critical for those interested in entering into the RF system with these cameras. Please make a review of EF-adapted glass for video auto focus performance.
Thanks again Jared, great to see the EF lenses perform well on the adapted mount. Seems no loss in speed or performance between the RF and adapted EF which is great news.
Keen to see low-light face tracking and high ISO performance together in action eg. Live music scenario
Great review!! OK, now the $1 million question, does that mean the R5/R6's AF is better than Sony now? It would have been an even more awesome review had you put your A7R IV in the same scenarios and compared it to the R5. Why don't I just get straight to the point, I would like to get your take on the R5 vs A7R IV, pros and cons and which in your opinion is the better camera? Boom, there I said it! That really is the bottom line.
Yes this is what we are all waiting to hear. Which one is better in still photography in comparison of dynamic range, AF, image quality etc
Great video Jared. Goes to show Canon didn’t forget about it’s previous photographers that have invested lots of money into Canon glass
whats crazy to me right now is how these pictures dont look that good zoomed out but when you zoom in they look sharper and better.. thats nuts..
Thanks much Jared. Love your content, and the way you present it. One question…which adapter model did you use for this test? Just curious as they offer a couple different models. Apologies up front if you addressed it and I missed it. Happy new year to you!
Having pre-purchased an R6 planning to use my EF glass with it this video made be breath a sigh of relief. I am basically a photo shooter looking to add the ability to do some quick hand held b-roll video shots as the situation presents itself. It takes way too long to break down my tripod setup and reset into my Ronin S gimbal. I’m hoping this solves my problem.
Wow! Impressive AF performance, cant wait to get the R6. I have few EF lens and not considering to get a new RF lens anytime soon. Great video Jared.
An excellent real world, real use, video..very informative and useful for working pro' photogs thinking of going R5/6 (me).