The function and order of the court is on the basis of law, not dependent on public opinion. The public can control the court by the election and by the parliament.
Judgements are passed in accordance with law enacted by parliament. You have a problem with the law? Take it up with the parliament- law makers. The judges can’t interfere with the voice of the people
Our judges are rather delicate and sensitive; I was once told that putting my hand in the pocket of my own trousers is showing disrespect to the judge. I replied that in India judges are there to protect the rights of people who put their hands in other's pockets.
its all over the world, you have to behave in front of judges, stay in discipline, show great respect to judges. wear nice suit etc. Judges give you justice, if you are a nice person, be polite, respect judges, respect the law.
Zero tolerance for all these collegium nepotism, self appointed, you scratch my back, I scratch yours Judges.public has no respect for these respect demanding judges.
Judges are ok with innocent people behind bars, and criminals roaming free and loads of dragging cases. But attire, food habit makes them so sensitive 🤮 With such senseless priorities of judges, our country is surely judicially ruined.
UPSC should be the only gateway to become the court judge.Why not in judiciary Where every appointment done through competitive examinations?Not only that proper vigilance clearance is required to prevent the entry of tented and corrupted person,
The judiciary has itself descended to absolute low. They either have to earn respect and trust of people by streamlining the judicial process or keep this mockery going.
Seriously ,Judges are passing judgements on mangalsutra ,bindi ,Pandit, sathpathi and what not and just because these judges have absolute power they are threatening people .I lost respect for judges when I saw some judges made vogue judgements ,Judges behaves like gods and public often trapped in vicious cycle of lawyers .Common citizen should be allowed to fight his own case as lawyers always manipulate .I am studying law from past 4 years and have read a lots of rulings and most were unfair .I don’t have lawyer certificate 😂.I know the law but I can never reach the judge as I will always need middleman .
Proper attire in the Supreme Court and in general is crucial for showing respect, maintaining professionalism, ensuring equality, minimizing distractions, and adhering to cultural norms. It influences first impressions, boosts confidence, and can be essential for safety and functionality in specific professions. Overall, proper attire helps uphold the dignity and decorum of professional and social settings.
Are these judges here to provide justice or judge people on their attire. Tomorrow a Judge gets offended by someone's face, is that person is expected to get a face lift. Just do your job judges.
Most of our countrymen don't have food, clothes, and shelter: SC should clarify their position w r. t. their stand on impropriety of attire in the courtroom. The days of calling judges lords and ladies should be over.
Why Supreme court wanted 1 month leave when 24 lakhs students suffering.including Supreme Court no body really bothered to give quick solution to suffered genuine students. When essential service works 24x7, 365x12 like doctors police etc what supreme court done for student over 1 month.India's legal system should be changed first
The case going to supreme court shows incapability of the government to fix any issue. The government and NTA refused to acknowledge any malpractice and paper leak in this exam while the evidence was right infront of their eyes. We just cannot go to supreme court for every issue but there is no other option
I have never seen any judge (former or present), commenting about inappropriate clothing of a women. As soon as we speak about women's proper clothing, it sparks a heavy backlash regarding misogyny and patriarchy. But when men dress inappropriately, it's game over .
Indian judiciary system must be changed, secondly appoint judges as against population ratio so that quick relief and disposal could be achieved , this is the only alternative,
@@aparnahungund5633Arnab Goswami May be a sycophant of Modi. But not atankwadi. Yes. He’s supported Pulwama attack without questioning, that doesn’t make him pro enemy. He’s a man who sold himself for a price
@@prasadm5873where did he support pulwama attack? Matlab kuch bhi 😂😂. Those who call Hafiz sayid as sahab, terrorists as bhatka hua naujawan, maoists as Martyrs and what's more army chief as sadak ka gunda are patriot acc to you. Typical chamchagiri 😂😂
Court should take action only against the culprits of misconduct just because of these incidents court should not ban video conferencing hearing because thousands of poors who are Party-in-persons who do not have money to travel to delhi for attending hearing in courts are benefiting the facility of video conference hearing. so Court should take action as and when such incidents occurs and court should never even imagine to ban video conference hearing
This is shameful and disrespect towards judiciary and most them are aware of these incidents,i have attended court for MLC cases we have to wear apron and put mobile phone on silent and we have to enter court room and greet the judges,my interaction with most of them was good,they will give respect to doctors and in my cases judges were like polite and respectful towards me ,once a young judge saw me and he told to take my case first, being q doctor my time is precious, to treat the needful people, I'm greaful for those judges who are so polite and as a young doctor it created good impact on me , thankyou sir and madam
Why respect should be given , now judgement is no more honest , judges are loosing their dignity as they give decisions which are suitable for govt and getting Jobs after retirement.
Tarik pe tarik is a mental harassment for the petitioner. Judges must empathise this and act accordingly. If not, all the trust from the judiciary system will become less day by day
I, really appreciate that the actions, taken against Advocates & Senior Officials of Government, for their misbehaviour and attitudes., by the Judges. Many of them think, they are the Boss of everything. Some of them really doesn't know how to behave with their customer & public.
Achi Baat Hai, logo ne izzat dena band kardiya judiciary ku karan yahi janata bhi hai, jo court apne hi parivar ka sadasya judge loyal ku insaf nahi dila saka to uska mazak bhi udana swabhabik hai ye maat kahna ki sabut nahi mila magar hatya to hui na bhai.
Reason lies in Judicial Fallibility!🇮🇳🙏 Because National Motto is Truth Alone Triumphs and Conduct of business of Government machinery, including Judiciary, is not adherant to the National Motto!. Jaisi karni waisi bharni!.🇮🇳🙏💯%✓
Lawyers should be *appropriately clad* , whether appearing in person or through video conferencing. Decorum is important. Every small thing matters in upholding the seriousness of justice dispensation. In today's noisy and often rebellious Democracy, Courts remain the last bastion of decorum and dignity. We should not allow the whim of a lawyer to overwhelm the writ of the SC. NOTHING can be too small in the arduous quest for Justice.
Courts should take decisions without any bias, some times courts are deciding decisions at late night for high profile people's like Satalwad,Aravind Kejriwal, Soran etc. When lakes of cases pending more than 10 years old. There is no equality before law Judges thinking that they are more superior than other human beings.
CJI???? A MAN HEARING 370 ??? FOR ZINHA AND NEHRU AND ANGREZ IF IT WAS EMERGENCY OF INDIRA UNDER EARLY RETIREMENT POLICY OF HER TIME THIS MAN DESRVED THAT
@@student_of_God You observe he knows nothing ??? USNE SALAM MARA (as they usually said in Bombay in 1968 In a restaurant owner said to waiter Saab ko Pani Maro but waiter was respectful to put Glass of water and Jug full in front of me) He knows this only NOT NAMASTE MARO NOT SALUTE MARO
@@Economics365 it was during corona lockdown when the court trials were held online. During that time after putting forward his point the lawyer forgot to off his camera and he assumed that the camera was off but it was on so he was having his lunch in the zoom meeting infront of the Solicitor general and the General came to know the lawyer has forgotten to off his camera so he called the lawyer and said about his camera and later on when the lawyer was found hurrying to switch off his camera the Solicitor general was found mocking the Lawyer
OMG ! As it is people are concerned about jurisprudence issues in country . Now on top of that , to know clients and lawyers and police could be seen in all sorts of unbecoming situations when they dispense justice , just adds one more layer of disbelief in jurisprudence . Shame .
@2:02..Wearing jeans is disrespect ?!?! Jeans is a material, which is also a decent full pant..what kind of disrespect will it show up to the judges and tye judiciary, if worn ?!?! Are Women lawyers restricted to wear only casual cotton saree and not any other kind of saree ??
It is simple respect of following dress code, dicopline, body language and submissivness and safeguarding the interest of clients - being lawyers, pleader,etc.,
I think court should show respect towards citizens of country. Judges are not kings but servent like any other government employees. So instead of focusing clothes of people they should focus on work. Also I want to clear one thing I am not against courts and judges but this is just not right...
Except for the last clip baki sab toh punishment mang hi rahe the. Tho i agree ki punishment might have gone too severe prr tum ek court ke samne ho toh proper attire dalke bethna toh basic manner hai
@@GladwinBenjamin I agree. But court and judges have more responsibilities. They should not have to manage these things. This type of things should be managed by other staff members. And if clothes are really important then court should give judgement or ask government to pass bill which address this dress code issue in court.
Every important place atleast a place of justice should should be held and taken as a place of sanctity. Not as a chai tapri or a bedroom..Thats the problem with law coming live as there is no fear and respect left.Mary John
It is better these judges have more prudence, which many a time not to be seen People certainly don't expect the lawyers exceeding the limits and decorum, but judges act law unto themselves irrespective of the lawful arguments, and they have become positive drags for democracy
What is proper attire. Human beings are free to wear dress, and if a person appear with out dress, he can be expunged. It is decency to wear proper dress and advocates must wear dress as by law expects.
Acha to court apna advocates k case pe busy hai wo bhi attire related and gareebo k paas paise nhi 100th hearing k liye. 👏🏻 Well done. Agar dhoti kurta hota to koi baat tha. Its too much with the ego of adapted judicial culture. 😡
Quite an amusing, different and educative video. Hats off. Btw the word 'faux pas' is pronounced as 'fo pa' I think. No offense meant. I wanted to point out because I quite like your clear voice and diction in general.
IT IS MUST THAT DECORUM OF DRESS IS NEEDED OTHERWISE PEOPLE WILL ATTEND IN ANDYS AND BARE BODIES. THIS SHOWS THAT THESE RIF RAFFS SHOULD BE PUT IN PRISON OTHERWISE THE DECENCY AND DECORUM WILL BE IN JEOPARDY.
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | เปิดใจ "อาจารย์ เบียร์ ฅนตื่นธรรม" นักสนทนาธรรมสายดุดัน!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vqaBI_mnoDk/mqdefault.jpg)
Courts should also be careful not to pass ridiculous judgements which leads to the public disrespecting them. Respect needs to be earned.
The function and order of the court is on the basis of law, not dependent on public opinion. The public can control the court by the election and by the parliament.
But court opens for political parties in the mid night.But for common man???? Does law different for different people????@@utpolsarker1666
Judgements are passed in accordance with law enacted by parliament. You have a problem with the law? Take it up with the parliament- law makers. The judges can’t interfere with the voice of the people
Our judges are rather delicate and sensitive; I was once told that putting my hand in the pocket of my own trousers is showing disrespect to the judge. I replied that in India judges are there to protect the rights of people who put their hands in other's pockets.
Pocket m hands daalne se ye disrespect ho gye 😂?
You have to act like a school child appearing before your principal. Putting your hands into your pocket shows a casual attitude.
its all over the world, you have to behave in front of judges, stay in discipline, show great respect to judges. wear nice suit etc. Judges give you justice, if you are a nice person, be polite, respect judges, respect the law.
@@JattFactornot really..
Judges in USA are so chill..
Watch videos in youtube, and you’ll know.
So what @@cool-aquarian
Zero tolerance for all these collegium nepotism, self appointed, you scratch my back, I scratch yours Judges.public has no respect for these respect demanding judges.
Judges are ok with innocent people behind bars, and criminals roaming free and loads of dragging cases.
But attire, food habit makes them so sensitive 🤮
With such senseless priorities of judges, our country is surely judicially ruined.
In this Modi first name crime minister is traveling around the world.
UPSC should be the only gateway to become the court judge.Why not in judiciary Where every appointment done through competitive examinations?Not only that proper vigilance clearance is required to prevent the entry of tented and corrupted person,
The judiciary has itself descended to absolute low. They either have to earn respect and trust of people by streamlining the judicial process or keep this mockery going.
😂 Supreme Court wants respect 😂.... Do they really know what they are doing ?
SC is arrogant and selective on reacting.
Court has time for such silly issues, but not for actual litigation
Silly issues are created by silly fellows called advocates, liars..err sorry lawyers.
Seriously ,Judges are passing judgements on mangalsutra ,bindi ,Pandit, sathpathi and what not and just because these judges have absolute power they are threatening people .I lost respect for judges when I saw some judges made vogue judgements ,Judges behaves like gods and public often trapped in vicious cycle of lawyers .Common citizen should be allowed to fight his own case as lawyers always manipulate .I am studying law from past 4 years and have read a lots of rulings and most were unfair .I don’t have lawyer certificate 😂.I know the law but I can never reach the judge as I will always need middleman .
Every common man who is mentally stanle has a right to appear in person in his own case if any.
First respect the right of others before demanding respect for oneself.
Are these really the issues that court should be bothered? Seems our court doesn't know that respect is earned and cannot be demanded.
Proper attire in the Supreme Court and in general is crucial for showing respect, maintaining professionalism, ensuring equality, minimizing distractions, and adhering to cultural norms. It influences first impressions, boosts confidence, and can be essential for safety and functionality in specific professions. Overall, proper attire helps uphold the dignity and decorum of professional and social settings.
Are these judges here to provide justice or judge people on their attire. Tomorrow a Judge gets offended by someone's face, is that person is expected to get a face lift. Just do your job judges.
Most of our countrymen don't have food, clothes, and shelter: SC should clarify their position w r. t. their stand on impropriety of attire in the courtroom. The days of calling judges lords and ladies should be over.
Judges who are not loyal to the Constitution are responsible for the respect of judiciary which is going down day by day.
Right!
Lack of discipline leads to judicial activism.
Why Supreme court wanted 1 month leave when 24 lakhs students suffering.including Supreme Court no body really bothered to give quick solution to suffered genuine students. When essential service works 24x7, 365x12 like doctors police etc what supreme court done for student over 1 month.India's legal system should be changed first
The case going to supreme court shows incapability of the government to fix any issue. The government and NTA refused to acknowledge any malpractice and paper leak in this exam while the evidence was right infront of their eyes. We just cannot go to supreme court for every issue but there is no other option
Useless overaction by judges.
Why judiciary employee are given vacations. There is not so work load upon them as compared to other departments.
If the system fails everything go wrong that it shows
ABSOLUTELY. OTHERWISE THESE ROGUES WILL COME BEFORE THE JUDGE AND WILL SAY PLEASE SHOW WHERE IT IS WRITTEN THAT ONE SHOULD WEAR A DRESS?
I MEANT NAKED AND WILL DEMAND THE JUDGE TO SHOW THE ORDER FOR WEARING DRESSES.
बड़े बड़े काम करने की ज़रूरत है ताकि न्याय मिल सके लोगों, चिंता इस बात की हो लोग न्याय में बाधा व देर न हो! बाक़ी सब टाईम पास
I have never seen any judge (former or present), commenting about inappropriate clothing of a women. As soon as we speak about women's proper clothing, it sparks a heavy backlash regarding misogyny and patriarchy.
But when men dress inappropriately, it's game over .
Bcoz if women dress improper society gets spoiled and crime happens and court get jobs.
Those judges must also respect public intrest not BJP
Say they should be impartial. Opening courts at midnight to release an atankwadi or not taking action against terrorists also partiality.
Indian judiciary system must be changed, secondly appoint judges as against population ratio so that quick relief and disposal could be achieved , this is the only alternative,
@@aparnahungund5633Arnab Goswami May be a sycophant of Modi. But not atankwadi. Yes. He’s supported Pulwama attack without questioning, that doesn’t make him pro enemy. He’s a man who sold himself for a price
@@prasadm5873where did he support pulwama attack?
Matlab kuch bhi 😂😂.
Those who call Hafiz sayid as sahab, terrorists as bhatka hua naujawan, maoists as Martyrs and what's more army chief as sadak ka gunda are patriot acc to you.
Typical chamchagiri 😂😂
Sach ki mirchi bahut tez hoti hai...
Court should take action only against the culprits of misconduct just because of these incidents court should not ban video conferencing hearing because thousands of poors who are Party-in-persons who do not have money to travel to delhi for attending hearing in courts are benefiting the facility of video conference hearing. so Court should take action as and when such incidents occurs and court should never even imagine to ban video conference hearing
Does JUDES declare their properties to govt. or public?
This is shameful and disrespect towards judiciary and most them are aware of these incidents,i have attended court for MLC cases we have to wear apron and put mobile phone on silent and we have to enter court room and greet the judges,my interaction with most of them was good,they will give respect to doctors and in my cases judges were like polite and respectful towards me ,once a young judge saw me and he told to take my case first, being q doctor my time is precious, to treat the needful people, I'm greaful for those judges who are so polite and as a young doctor it created good impact on me , thankyou sir and madam
Judiciary should be more fair and accountable to the system of justice
Honorable judges have power to deliver sentence which is commensurate.
Why respect should be given , now judgement is no more honest , judges are loosing their dignity as they give decisions which are suitable for govt and getting Jobs after retirement.
Jo thoda bhi court me jata hai o wakil or peskar ki baat sunkar khud hi sochne lagta hai ki kya ho raha hai
Waise nyay kitne saal me milna chahiye😂😂😂😂. Sayad, Indian system ke se to Logo ki apni antim yatra karne se pahle
Tarik pe tarik is a mental harassment for the petitioner. Judges must empathise this and act accordingly. If not, all the trust from the judiciary system will become less day by day
Court chhuti k baad neend khuli aur apna pending work ka gussa dusre par nikalenge
She should be removed from the courts!!! Who does she think she is????
Decorum of the judiciary should be obide by every one.
Thanks you Mama गंकारे dana kaleyà thakesyou sir 💐🙏
I, really appreciate that
the actions, taken against Advocates & Senior Officials of Government, for their
misbehaviour and attitudes.,
by the Judges. Many of them think, they are the
Boss of everything. Some of them really doesn't know
how to behave with their
customer & public.
MIGHT IS ALWAYS RIGHT SON🎉
Still in the mindset of British ruler.
Court is a joker in India 🇮🇳
Very ridiculous act
भारतीय न्याय पालिका जिन्दाबाद 👏👏👏👏👏💪💪💪💪💪🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡
Achi Baat Hai, logo ne izzat dena band kardiya judiciary ku karan yahi janata bhi hai, jo court apne hi parivar ka sadasya judge loyal ku insaf nahi dila saka to uska mazak bhi udana swabhabik hai ye maat kahna ki sabut nahi mila magar hatya to hui na bhai.
Marriage and divorce related laws are so complicated for both men and women and yet it continue from British times .
Jub SC court ka ye hal hai to baki niche ka court ka kya hal hoga
Reason lies in Judicial Fallibility!🇮🇳🙏 Because National Motto is Truth Alone Triumphs and Conduct of business of Government machinery, including Judiciary, is not adherant to the National Motto!. Jaisi karni waisi bharni!.🇮🇳🙏💯%✓
Dignity has to be maintained. Even in virtual mode, normal court /tribunal attire should be enforced.
Lawyers should be *appropriately clad* , whether appearing in person or through video conferencing. Decorum is important. Every small thing matters in upholding the seriousness of justice dispensation. In today's noisy and often rebellious Democracy, Courts remain the last bastion of decorum and dignity. We should not allow the whim of a lawyer to overwhelm the writ of the SC. NOTHING can be too small in the arduous quest for Justice.
No real owner 📝
In view of these circumstances the lawyers sanad should be suspended for ever.
Courts should take decisions without any bias, some times courts are deciding decisions at late night for high profile people's like Satalwad,Aravind Kejriwal, Soran etc. When lakes of cases pending more than 10 years old. There is no equality before law Judges thinking that they are more superior than other human beings.
Supreme court ko itani bhi satta mat do jo apni manmani kar sake
It's a banana republic!!!!
They should first make some introspection whether they are really delivering Justice or just boot licking their boses
Why not the entire supreme courts put signs NOT ALLOWED EAT OR DRINK IN THE COURT OR THE BUILDING. Anil from USA.
If being a lawyer or petitioner you do not show respect to the court, court has right to throw you out. Excellent decisions by judges.
Very high handed of the Court - truly the word 'Lordship' said many times over and over again seems to have gone to their head.
My question is very simple. Why should all SC judges go on leave at the same time? Cant it be staggered
They consider turmselves beyond everything they expect from others.
JUDGES ARE Epitome of delivery of big JUSTICE
Right C J I ko salam
CJI???? A MAN HEARING 370 ???
FOR ZINHA AND NEHRU AND ANGREZ
IF IT WAS EMERGENCY OF INDIRA
UNDER EARLY RETIREMENT POLICY OF HER TIME
THIS MAN DESRVED THAT
You know nothing
@@student_of_God
You observe he knows nothing ???
USNE SALAM MARA (as they usually said in Bombay in 1968 In a restaurant owner said to waiter Saab ko Pani Maro but waiter was respectful to put Glass of water and Jug full in front of me)
He knows this only
NOT NAMASTE MARO
NOT SALUTE MARO
Having lunch while on zoom call was the best . And so the Solicitor General gesture 😂😂😂
Highest point.
Please explain,i don't know
@@Economics365 it was during corona lockdown when the court trials were held online. During that time after putting forward his point the lawyer forgot to off his camera and he assumed that the camera was off but it was on so he was having his lunch in the zoom meeting infront of the Solicitor general and the General came to know the lawyer has forgotten to off his camera so he called the lawyer and said about his camera and later on when the lawyer was found hurrying to switch off his camera the Solicitor general was found mocking the Lawyer
India is a secular nation. Why do courts need to be on holiday for communal festivals and seasonal vacations?
Funny indian judiciary 😂😂😂
Its true. Judiciary is losing respect in recent times because of indecent behaviour of the inmates ---Lawyers/Advocates
खानदानी judges के साथ ठीक हो रहा है
Even jeans is considered inappropriate? What nonsense!
Not everyone can dress up like Voldemort to court. 😅
When they cant provide justice on time and 75% of criminal cases are under trial.and expecting uniform...hahahah
OMG ! As it is people are concerned about jurisprudence issues in country . Now on top of that , to know clients and lawyers and police could be seen in all sorts of unbecoming situations when they dispense justice , just adds one more layer of disbelief in jurisprudence . Shame .
Justice Chandrachud is a great man, wish him all the best.
Blue jeans ke badle White jeans chalega kya ?
Court should take action against those who not following law and Order
Corrupt court has no right.
@2:02..Wearing jeans is disrespect ?!?! Jeans is a material, which is also a decent full pant..what kind of disrespect will it show up to the judges and tye judiciary, if worn ?!?! Are Women lawyers restricted to wear only casual cotton saree and not any other kind of saree ??
Kanoon to andha hota hai na ?
😂
It is simple respect of following dress code, dicopline, body language and submissivness and safeguarding the interest of clients - being lawyers, pleader,etc.,
लगता है दस सालों में कोर्ट की अहमियत को राख का प्रतीक की पहचान है दंनयबआद
वो आदमी का अभिव्यक्ति स्वतंत्र है। 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 तैयार रहो कोठे में एक आजाद भी पड़ने वाली है अगले 20 साल में
I think court should show respect towards citizens of country. Judges are not kings but servent like any other government employees. So instead of focusing clothes of people they should focus on work.
Also I want to clear one thing I am not against courts and judges but this is just not right...
Except for the last clip baki sab toh punishment mang hi rahe the. Tho i agree ki punishment might have gone too severe prr tum ek court ke samne ho toh proper attire dalke bethna toh basic manner hai
@@GladwinBenjamin I agree. But court and judges have more responsibilities. They should not have to manage these things. This type of things should be managed by other staff members. And if clothes are really important then court should give judgement or ask government to pass bill which address this dress code issue in court.
Every important place atleast a place of justice should should be held and taken as a place of sanctity. Not as a chai tapri or a bedroom..Thats the problem with law coming live as there is no fear and respect left.Mary John
NTA के खिलाफ इतनी सारी शिकायतों, जांच की जानी चाहिए और मुकदमा चलाया जाना चाहिए।'🔥
jaan krke nhi krte, kbhi kbhi technology ki knowledge na hone ki vjh se jo jata h
कओलइजईएम ही भारत की पहचान है दंनयबआद
Whether that is virtual or a real conference, the professionals must follow dress custom.
Its bcoz bench n bar both have lost the ethical values of judicial system in the present scenario
J judge was right people should show respect to Courts
Wearing jeans is inappropriate? Which era the judges are living?
1200s
It is better these judges have more prudence, which many a time not to be seen
People certainly don't expect the lawyers exceeding the limits and decorum, but judges act law unto themselves irrespective of the lawful arguments, and they have become positive drags for democracy
Mehta be like, "Idhar idhar... mujhe bhi do".
CJI said categorically that people need not call court a temple and judges are not Gods, ! May be all these things may be happening.
😂 🤣
Thanks bete
So this is FREE SPEECH in a democracy??? We cant wear jeans & T shirts??????
They think they are above all things..Arrogancy of any one shall not be tolerated in a democratic country may be PM or CM..all r equal
Advocates must respect judges and behave as per the guidelines. Otherwise stringent action must be initiated against such advocates.
What is proper attire. Human beings are free to wear dress, and if a person appear with out dress, he can be expunged. It is decency to wear proper dress and advocates must wear dress as by law expects.
Acha to court apna advocates k case pe busy hai wo bhi attire related and gareebo k paas paise nhi 100th hearing k liye. 👏🏻 Well done. Agar dhoti kurta hota to koi baat tha. Its too much with the ego of adapted judicial culture. 😡
Quite an amusing, different and educative video. Hats off.
Btw the word 'faux pas' is pronounced as 'fo pa' I think.
No offense meant. I wanted to point out because I quite like your clear voice and diction in general.
Unfortunate...
I think Bela is the judge who always postpones the cases related to opposition and even with holds the bail..
IT IS MUST THAT DECORUM OF DRESS IS NEEDED OTHERWISE PEOPLE WILL ATTEND IN ANDYS AND BARE BODIES. THIS SHOWS THAT THESE RIF RAFFS SHOULD BE PUT IN PRISON OTHERWISE THE DECENCY AND DECORUM WILL BE IN JEOPARDY.
न्याय बिक रहा है ७५ सालों से, बनियान, जींस पहन कर वे न्याय मांग रहे हैं, न्याय बेच नही रहे।
जिन वकीलों के खिलाफ आप शिकायत कर रहे हैं वह कहीं ना कहीं सरकार से या नहीं बीजेपी से ताल्लुक आते होंगे।