Maestro que enorme son tus conocimientos ,son y serán de muchos utilidad, sus aportes los he utilizado en gran manera, pero me sería mejor que sus aportes fueran en Español, gracias le agradezco, hasta pronto
Objectivity probably everything is boring, thats why they say even the gods are fighting boredome in vain, but at the same time, everything might become intresting from the moment on, that you get a glimps of its beauty - how long it will last depends on the complexity and the capacity of the mind to process this conplexity. Given the fact that there is more than enough of this complexity for the average mind, and even above avarage in chess, the opinion that its boring usually is an indication its proponent just hasn't got an idea what he/she is talking about. On the other hand: if such an oppinion is sustained even by the world-champion in chess itself, one cant generalize this thesis, and has to concede, that even in chess there seems to be a certain level of mastership, from where on it becomes more like routine, or a professional burden, this is nothing special, but like I mentioned at the beginning, objectivly the same with everything except life and subjektivity itself (from here on its a shorts jump to guess why the bored gods decided to create it). Hard to imagine a modern chess-computer has an interest in it, though it certainly has a great expertise, but its not bored either, so maybe thats another way to look at it: simply beeing beyond the question of boredom/entertainment, but who wants that? Speaking for myself, I play chess now for more than 30 years, and I still love it and learn about it, so I wouldnt say, there is nothing new under the sun, that can also be something positive, so maybe there is still hope somehow!
Man u rawk! I look forward to your videos so much! Man you are so highly skilled and awesome sauce humour! ROFL fade your own voice out as noise rofl :D I played the Polish for awhile and never knew about that Alekhine transposition. Thanks for your hard work! :D
@@checkmate7311 Hi, I thought, That I was Kaspa's number one fan. LOL. But that's Ok my chess friend I can be number 2. Smile. And have a great day. Peace. 🙏😎
d4 b5 e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Bxb5 c5 if white plays c3 instead of other moves, then c5xd4 Qxd4, doesn't white keep the extra pawn without problems? Thanks for possible corrections
@@MT.5711 Oh! you are right. But practically speaking, no one plays c3 on move 5. Even if they do, that's why it's called a gambit. You deliberately give up a pawn for some quick development and great attacking opportunities. Just like what we do in the Wings Gambit, Benko Gambit, Danish Gambit, etc. However, one possible continuation may be: 1. d4 b5 2. e4 Nf6 3. e5 Nd5 4. Bxb5 c5 5. c3 Qa5 6. a4 cxd4 7. Qxd4 e6 8. Nf3 a6 9. Bd3 Nc6. And there goes a normal Gambit where Black is leading with the attack.
@@kaspachessofficial Thanks for your reply. Actually after the variation you suggested it seems to me that there is not such return for black for the pawn. If white doesn't make big mistakes should win. Anyway thanks for proposing unusual openings and variations.
![Best Chess Opening Against 1.e4 & 1.d4 [TRAPS Included]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GUmXXdMDCIs/mqdefault.jpg)
Maestro que enorme son tus conocimientos ,son y serán de muchos utilidad, sus aportes los he utilizado en gran manera, pero me sería mejor que sus aportes fueran en Español, gracias le agradezco, hasta pronto
Merci beaucoup Kaspa,on of your big fan from Democratic republic of Congo. Since i descovered your videos my games have emproved alot.
Thank you. Keep it up 💪
You're doing great Job man 🙏🏻
Ty for opening my eye balls to this opening!😂
Objectivity probably everything is boring, thats why they say even the gods are fighting boredome in vain, but at the same time, everything might become intresting from the moment on, that you get a glimps of its beauty - how long it will last depends on the complexity and the capacity of the mind to process this conplexity. Given the fact that there is more than enough of this complexity for the average mind, and even above avarage in chess, the opinion that its boring usually is an indication its proponent just hasn't got an idea what he/she is talking about. On the other hand: if such an oppinion is sustained even by the world-champion in chess itself, one cant generalize this thesis, and has to concede, that even in chess there seems to be a certain level of mastership, from where on it becomes more like routine, or a professional burden, this is nothing special, but like I mentioned at the beginning, objectivly the same with everything except life and subjektivity itself (from here on its a shorts jump to guess why the bored gods decided to create it). Hard to imagine a modern chess-computer has an interest in it, though it certainly has a great expertise, but its not bored either, so maybe thats another way to look at it: simply beeing beyond the question of boredom/entertainment, but who wants that? Speaking for myself, I play chess now for more than 30 years, and I still love it and learn about it, so I wouldnt say, there is nothing new under the sun, that can also be something positive, so maybe there is still hope somehow!
Not to offend you and your writing effort I don't think that Kaspa even tried to read this.
@@DonDef88PL Sorry, cant read what you wrote, to busy with my next comment, to bored with those from others, no offence!
That’s an interesting comment
min. 10 if e6 instead of Qc4 then Ne5, is playable Qe4 attacking the Knight defending c6 too?
If Qf3 exchange the Qeens.
Thanks
You know my needs men, these d4 opening by my opponents was really trouble some,but oops here comes kaspa with a blockbuster strategy 😂
Dear Kaspa,
Your videos truly are wonderful.
Item: the word "flank" can be used to describe pawns other than the centre. Cheers!
Regards,
Bob ♟🇨🇦
Great vid! So many cool ideas
Please do more opening variations for black.
15:17 after ...Nge7, can white take pawn on b4?
Man u rawk! I look forward to your videos so much! Man you are so highly skilled and awesome sauce humour! ROFL fade your own voice out as noise rofl :D
I played the Polish for awhile and never knew about that Alekhine transposition. Thanks for your hard work! :D
Your videos are really beautiful!
Like or Dislike: Like. Thank you. I don't have an aggressive weapon against 1.d4 so I may give this a try.
Yes I too have a solid system reply but its not a trappy line, just something that the opponent likely hasn't seen before. I'm gonna switch too! :D
Hey kaspa i like your videos keep it up can you make a video Ruy Lopez as Black Tnx.
Sure, I will!
@@kaspachessofficial Tnx kaspa i can't wait to see your next videos im your#1 fan.
@@checkmate7311 Hi, I thought, That I was Kaspa's number one fan. LOL. But that's Ok my chess friend I can be number 2. Smile. And have a great day. Peace. 🙏😎
I really learn from you 👌
You deliver!
d4 b5 e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Bxb5 c5 if white plays c3 instead of other moves, then c5xd4 Qxd4, doesn't white keep the extra pawn without problems?
Thanks for possible corrections
At what time? E.g. At 03:00
@@kaspachessofficial
Min. 4.00
@@MT.5711 Oh! you are right. But practically speaking, no one plays c3 on move 5. Even if they do, that's why it's called a gambit. You deliberately give up a pawn for some quick development and great attacking opportunities. Just like what we do in the Wings Gambit, Benko Gambit, Danish Gambit, etc.
However, one possible continuation may be: 1. d4 b5 2. e4 Nf6 3. e5 Nd5 4. Bxb5 c5 5. c3 Qa5 6. a4 cxd4 7. Qxd4 e6 8. Nf3 a6 9. Bd3 Nc6.
And there goes a normal Gambit where Black is leading with the attack.
@@kaspachessofficial
Thanks for your reply.
Actually after the variation you suggested it seems to me that there is not such return for black for the pawn.
If white doesn't make big mistakes should win.
Anyway thanks for proposing unusual openings and variations.
Keep the music off please!
Super.
Bravo
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
😢